Slavery ‘on a grander scale…’

There is a presumed history of things that is taught to most, that even the less powerful from amongst the elites believe...and then there is another history of these events, that only a relative few and powerful know.  It is important for those wishing to see not only the preservation of their own people, but the other various peoples of the world as well that make up humanity, to have an excellent grasp of the past so as to see clearly as to what to do in the present.  Hence entries here such as this...

Published in 1853 by US based economist Henry Charles Carey (1793-1879), this is an in-depth examination of the new, more virulent, incredibly destructive variant of slavery, euphamistically referred to as ‘cheap labor’, an integral part of the ‘New Order’ of things, which is central to the ideology of Multi-Culturalism, and what remained of the ghastly far less profitable, primitive, classical system of chattel slavery that cheap labor was fast replacing.  Filled with many contemporary accounts and facts this is of as much interest today as it was then.  Obviously it is best to simply pay people what the labor is worth rather than trying to find ways to steal labor thru variants of slavery as a relative few, though powerful do, at about just everyone else’s very great expense.  Appropriately the book is entitled The Slave Trade.

Some excerpts

Henry Charles Carey

“It is the slave trade of the last century reproduced on a grander scale...” Carey regarding ‘cheap labor’

The Slave Trade
Domestic and Foreign
Why It Exists, and How it May Be Extinguished

By Henry Charles Carey

Author of “Principles of Political Economy,” “The Past, The Present, and The Future”, Etc., Etc.

Preface

The subject discussed in the following pages is one of great importance, and especially to the people of this country.  The views presented for consideration, both as regards the cause of evil and the mode of cure; but it does not follow necessarily that they are not correct, — as the reader may readily satisfy himself by reflecting upon the fact, that there is scarcely an opinion he now holds, that has not, and at no very distant period, been deemed quite as heretical as any here advanced.  In reflecting upon them, and upon the facts by which they are supported, he is requested to bear in mind that the latter are, with very few exceptions, drawn from writers holding views directly opposed to those of the author of this volume; and not therefore to be suspected of any exaggeration of the injurious effects of the system here treated as leading to slavery, or the beneficial ones resulting from that here described as tending to establish perfect and universal freedom of thought, speech, action and trade.

Philadelphia, March, 1853.

Chapter I.
The Wide Extent of Slavery

Slavery still exists throughout a large portion of what we are accustomed to regard as the civilized world.  In some countries, men are forced to take the chance of a lottery for the determination of the question whether they shall or shall not be transported to distant and unhealthy countries, there most probably to perish, leaving behind them impoverished mothers and sisters to lament their fate.  In others, they are seized on the highway and sent to sea for long terms of years, while parents, wives, and sisters, who had been dependent on their exertions, are left to perish of starvation, or driven to vice or crime to procure the means of support.  In a third class, men, their wives, and children, are driven from their homes to perish in the road, or to endure the slavery of dependence on public charity until pestilence shall send them to their graves, and thus clear the way for a fresh supply of others like themselves.  In a fourth, we see men driven to selling themselves for long periods at hard labour in distant countries, deprived of the society of parents, relatives, or friends.  In a fifth, men, women, and children are exposed to sale, and wives are separated from husbands, while children are separated from parents.  In some, white men, and, in others, black men, are subjected to the lash, and to other of the severest and most degrading punishments.  In some places men are deemed valuable, and they are well fed and clothed.  In others, man is regarded as “a drug” and population as “a nuisance” and Christian men are warned that their duty to God and to society requires that they should permit their fellow-creatures to suffer every privation and distress, short of “absolute, death,” with a view to prevent the increase of numbers…

Continued...

Posted by Alex on Friday, February 5, 2010 at 06:36 PM in
Comments (16) | Tell-a-Friend

The Doctrines of Modern Political Economy

There is a presumed history of things that is taught to most, that even the less powerful from amongst the elites believe...and then there is another history of these events, that only a relative few and powerful know.  It is important for those wishing to see not only the preservation of their own people, but the other various peoples of the world as well that make up humanity, to have an excellent grasp of the past so as to see clearly as to what to do in the present.  Hence entries here such as this...

This is a very insightful 1864 condensation of Henry Charles Carey’s 1857 book Principle’s of Social Science edited by Kate McKean. Carey was an economist in the states who believed the free enterprise system should be a tool of man, and man not a tool of it ... that like fire it must be carefully watched and controlled lest persons, peoples, their cultures and lands be harmed by it. Carey felt something was quite amiss though, and that the Ricardo-Malthusian economic system used by Great Britain (and apparently by America) with it’s heavy emphasis on trade, would in the course of time ultimately result in the enslavement of all of humanity. Carey’s ideas regarding economics became quite popular at the time they were initially published, but alas did not take hold.

The “doctrines of modern political economy” according to the author include the adoption by the state’s economists the theory of “over population”, the necessity for “a cheap and abundant supply of labor”, and the seeing “in man a mere instrument to be used in trade.”

Here are some excerpts from Carey’s book whose words speak for themselves and are in many instances quite applicable to today.  In his writing, Carey engages in ‘constructive criticism’, which I see as a legitimate exercise, as opposed to bashing.

Cheap Laborers (AKA ‘Immigrants’) on the Mediterranean Island of Lampedusa Awaiting to be Imported by Diktat to Various European Countries

Preface.

...

“Why do misery and crime exist?  Why, when so large a portion of the earth is yet unoccupied, are human beings suffering for food, and crowded together in unwholesome dens, to the sacrifice of comfort, decency, and health?  Why does one nation export food of which its own members are in need, while another sends its manufactures throughout the world although hundreds of thousands at home are scarcely clothed?  Why are nations or individuals seen elbowing each other, so to speak, for room to live?  Why are we called to witness everywhere an uneasy jealousy among communities each watching with an unfriendly eye the expansion of the other - the strong ever encroaching on the rights of the weak?  Why should the chief of European nations wage a ceaseless “warfare” against the industry and prosperity of the world at large?  In short, what is the cause of the measureless woe that exist in this fair world which its Creator pronounced to be “very good”?

Continued...

Posted by Alex on Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 10:06 PM in
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

Critique of Palingenesis

by Potential Frolic

I want to explain my struggle with the idea of Palingenesis and what it has taught me about nationalism and myself.  The desire to do this flows from frequent encounters here and elsewhere with “the Palingenetic Necessity”, which I define as the conviction that no other model of political action can support white survival in our times.

Understanding the problem

Seeing the destructive forces working upon our peoples presently, and fearing very much for his own survival and that of his people, the (folkish) nationalist turns his eye to Palingenesis, which presents itself as the opposite to today’s politics of ethnic suicide. The goal of Palingenesis is to renew the values of a supposed heroic and glorious past, these values being assumed to be real and contingent even if the past in question is only a myth, and to venture towards heroism and glory in the present. 

GW has argued that advocates of Palingenesis are not necessarily good psychologists. They do not take account of the fact that the man is of the time in which he is born, decadent or otherwise, and carries only two possibilities within himself:

(i) to belong to that time and have no truck with, or even knowledge of, the truth of his Self, or

(ii) to seek out truth even at the cost of turning away - if someone tells him how - from time and place and artifice.

There is no special third option for the rebirth of the spirit as heroism and glory, according to GW.  Heroism and glory are not characteristics of the true Self but of immersion in violence.  They can only appear in time and place, therefore, and cannot be different to or better than the rest of the artifice.  They are a beautiful deception - in fact, a bastardization for the purpose of reifying political violence.

As psychology, then, Palingenesis as it appears in fascism and revolutionary conservatism is a sham, albeit an alluring one.  It answers the following two wholly utilitarian questions in the positive:

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 01:26 AM in National Socialism
Comments (87) | Tell-a-Friend

A reply to Ozy

My reply on the liberal mind thread to our Guardianista OZKT29B - henceforth called Ozy courtesy of Captainchaos - grew rather long.  There is a 5,000 character limit on comments, so I thought I would make a new post of it instead.  Ozy’s last comment, to which I was responding, is here.

OZKT29B,

I was happy to follow Lord Arlen’s example and allow you to strike the very first blow.  The meat of the conversation, though, will now be on the worth of the beliefs you hold.

You write:

You are perpetuating the narrative that any thought that isn’t extremely marginal is, in fact, sheep-like and unconscious.

Our racial thoughts and instincts are the racial thoughts and instincts of the people.  They are no more marginal than is human nature itself.  But there is a powerful conflict between human nature and liberalism in the West.  Liberalism, in the broadest sense, is the controlling idea of our age.  Every person of European descent is enculturated in it, and enculturated thereby in conflict with their own racial thoughts and instincts.

Nationalist philosophy is not at all a formative factor on the psychological landscape.  To come to nationalism, then, you must, at some level, realise that your entire understanding of not just politics or even ideas, but life in general, including the acquired part of the Self, has been unconsciously absorbed, and all life long you have defended the result quite unconsciously too - just as you are defending it today.

We are not born with the power to choose the influences we absorb.  We walk out in the rain, that is all.  Freedom - the real thing, not the liberal confection - consists in recognising this unconsciousness, this power of the acquired, and turning instead towards that which is true in us.  Many of us here know this.  I think it highly unlikely that you know it.

So ... I am not “perpetuating” any narratives.  I am trying to bring you, as quickly as possible, to the beginnings of the understanding that, so far in your life, you have not owned the formative processes of your own mind.  Not only, then, are you not free but you cannot be free, regardless of the “liberty” in the liberalism you espouse.

We can discuss in detail what passes for freedom in the liberal canon later.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 12:30 AM in Liberalism & the Left
Comments (80) | Tell-a-Friend

Fixing Hubbert Linearization

Peak oil curves are largely based on a model called Hubbert Linearization.  Some critics claim that this model is incorrect.  The fix may be as simple as assuming a slight positive skew on the production curve.

Continued...

Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, February 4, 2010 at 12:25 AM in
Comments (0) | Tell-a-Friend

The Bear’s Lair: Let’s Atomize Wall Street

By Martin Hutchinson

Paul Volcker’s proposal that proprietary trading should be spun off from deposit taking banks is a worthwhile step in the direction of stabilizing the financial services business. However when you consider that business in detail, it becomes clear that further breakups are necessary in order to remove the excessive risks from the US economic system.

Volcker became something of a hero to the left for his sponsorship of President Obama’s bank-bashing announcement.  Indeed I was very much hoping that he could ride this new-found enthusiasm through a defeat of Ben Bernanke in his Senate confirmation vote, followed by a more or less unanimous Senate approval of a Volcker nomination to replace him as Fed Chairman. Assuming Volcker hadn’t suffered a Damsacene conversion to sloppy monetary policy while I wasn’t looking, Obama and the left would be suffering buyer’s remorse within about an hour of Volcker’s arrival at the Fed, but by that stage the deed would be done. I was practicing my Dr. Evil laugh for this eventuality, but alas it was not to be.

There are three problems with the current set-up on Wall Street: systemic risk, rent seeking and conflicts of interest. The Volcker proposal addresses the systemic risk problem to a great extent, but does not do much about the other two. For a complete solution we thus need to go further.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 at 02:17 PM in Economics & Finance
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

What can be done

I received a circular mail from the Australian National Anarchism activist Welf Herfurth a couple of days ago.  Essentially, he was making an appeal for funds for Andrew Yeoman’s outfit in the Bay Area.  The basis of the appeal was that Andrew’s prodigious energy has been richly rewarded.  But welcome as it is, success and political advancement needs to be funded:

Since he started to get active, Andy’s Bay Area National Anarchists group grew from a few people to the biggest alternative metapolitical group in San Francisco. Here are some of their major achievements in the past few years:

* 44,000+ website hits (http://www.bayareanationalanarchists.com/blog/)
* 22,000+ YouTube video views (http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=bay+area+national+anarchists&search_type=&aq=0&oq=Bay+area+national+)
* Regularly hosted meetings and recurring events (Monthly Meetings, White Cross Patrols, Folsom Street Fair Protest)
* Speaking events including Emeryville, Orange County, and Sydney Australia
* A large increase in support from groups across the nation and abroad
* Hosting foreign visitors for events and speeches
* The first unofficial BANA housing collective
* Media coverage by a local newspaper and the SPLC
* Flyering runs in Berkeley, San Francisco, and Petaluma
* A continuous presence at street protests
* The formation of sister networks in Sacramento, Santa Cruz, Inland Empire, and Orange County
* Our first online radio interview
* 22 videos produced and 3 more in production
* At least 4 blog posts a month
* A business plan
* An active Facebook presence
* PayPal subscribers (currently numbering at 5)
* A custom graphic banner on the website made by allies in the UK
* A private mail box

I think you agree with me that this is a very impressive list of achievements.

Our ‘friends’ from the SPLC wrote a very interesting article about the BANA that you can find here:
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=1058

And Spencer Sunshine wrote this for the Public Eye website:
http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v23n4/rebranding_fascism.html

Last, but not least, here is an interview with Andy with the well respected and valued ‘The Occidental Quarterly’:
http://www.toqonline.com/2009/08/interview-with-andrew-yeoman-part-i/

So you can see that he is not only promising political activism, but also he is delivering it too. The BANA are a group of dedicated and committed people. I know for sure that Andy not only spends every spare minute in organising events, making videos, networking with likeminded people, etc, but he also puts thousands of dollars of his own money into the cause ...

And what followed was the appeal for funds.  I shan’t copy that out.  But if you know Andrew’s work and want to offer him some support, here’s the link:

http://bayareanationalanarchists.com/blog/2009/09/bana-monthly-donations.html

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 at 01:24 AM in Activism
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

Harrison Bergeron

This comes from something of an unexpected source, the US based writer Kurt Vonnegut Jr.  He was a little bit like Orwell in the sense that, though a believer in the increasingly apparent false dichotomy of left/right, Capitalist/Marxists, etc, and of the radical left persuasion, he still came up with this fine work, much as Orwell came up with Animal Farm and 1984. There is a great deal of truth in this short story.

As to the plot...on a future Earth, the human spirit overcomes if but briefly those who would make everyone and everything the same.

“THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else...”

Harrison Bergeron

by Kurt Vonnegut (1961)

“THE YEAR WAS 2081, and everybody was finally equal. They weren’t only equal before God and the law. They were equal every which way. Nobody was smarter than anybody else. Nobody was better looking than anybody else. Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else. All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.

Some things about living still weren’t quite right, though. April, for instance, still drove people crazy by not being springtime. And it was in that clammy month that the H-G men took George and Hazel Bergeron’s fourteen-year-old son, Harrison, away.

It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn’t think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn’t think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains.

George and Hazel were watching television. There were tears on Hazel’s cheeks, but she’d forgotten for the moment what they were about.

On the television screen were ballerinas.

A buzzer sounded in George’s head. His thoughts fled in panic, like bandits from a burglar alarm.

“That was a real pretty dance, that dance they just did,” said Hazel.

“Huh?” said George.

“That dance – it was nice,” said Hazel.

“Yup,” said George. He tried to think a little about the ballerinas. They weren’t really very good – no better than anybody else would have been, anyway. They were burdened with sashweights and bags of birdshot, and their faces were masked, so that no one, seeing a free and graceful gesture or a pretty face, would feel like something the cat drug in. George was toying with the vague notion that maybe dancers shouldn’t be handicapped. But he didn’t get very far with it before another noise in his ear radio scattered his thoughts.

George winced. So did two out of the eight ballerinas.

Hazel saw him wince. Having no mental handicap herself she had to ask George what the latest sound had been.

“Sounded like somebody hitting a milk bottle with a ball peen hammer,” said George.

“I’d think it would be real interesting, hearing all the different sounds,” said Hazel, a little envious. “All the things they think up.”

Continued...

Posted by Alex on Friday, January 29, 2010 at 06:32 PM in
Comments (13) | Tell-a-Friend

Is Ducks Unlimited Sowing the Seeds for the next Holocaust?

In a remarkable op-ed piece in the Jerusalem Post, Hawaiian Jew Sydney Ross Singer asks ’Are Jews an invasive species?‘

According to Singer, the study of invasive species began as ‘Nazi science’ and he considers the theory a biological threat to Jews, similar to how Auster considers Darwinism a threat to Jews. 

There is a new biological threat to Jews around the world that has the potential for mass destruction of life. It is not in the form of a disease or mutation. This biological threat comes in the form of a theory.

...

The theory is called invasion biology. It started with the Nazis, and it now dominates environmentalism worldwide. It extols the “native” and exterminates the “alien.” It seeks to purify the environment of the unwanted and destructive influence of “invasive species.” As with eugenics, it passes judgment on the value of others and whether or not they should be allowed to live, or be eradicated. In this case, the “others” are plants and animals.

His conclusion is the following:

Surely, there is a time and place for weeding, selecting and controlling species and people. But we must reject the very notion that some species should be eradicated simply because they are not “native.” In human affairs we call this ethnic cleansing and genocide, and we have seen how ugly it is. It is no less ugly when unleashed on a plant or animal, its seeds of intolerance and hatred lying dormant for the next Holocaust.

If one looks at Ducks Unlimited’s entry on its first ‘Invasive Species of Concern’ (purple loosestrife), one can imagine how a paranoid tribalist might reach such a bold conclusion:

Purple loosestrife is an aggressive exotic plant species that commonly invades North American
wetlands. Under certain moist soil conditions, purple loosestrife may outcompete native vegetation
reducing the availability of important waterfowl food sources and cover types. Eradication
is difficult but if detected early, the spread and impact of purple loosestrife can be minimized.
Extended flooding during late spring may exterminate loosestrife plants but seeds often remain
viable in the soil for long periods of time. However, reducing native plant species composition
may result from extended periods of flooding. EPA approved herbicides such as Roundup (Reg.
No. 524-343) are most effective against purple loosestrife, however annual application is needed
to ensure eradication. Plants should be sprayed when flowering, but before setting seed. Check
local, state and federal regulations prior to applying any herbicides within a body of water. Biological
control programs, notably the introduction of two leaf-eating beetles and a root boring weevil
from Europe, have gained popularity in recent years and appear to be an effective measure of
control.

“Yeah, right… ‘Roundup.’ So that’s what you guys call it this time around.  Not a very subtle name, that!”

But Singer’s right to be concerned.  Any attempt to understand Jewish influence must do so within the context of human ecology, as James has stressed, and defensible analogies (parasite and invasive species) are not flattering.  The obvious conclusion is that Jews should be separated from the White human ecology.  Singer’s conclusion, however, is that the concept of invasive species itself should be demonized (just as Auster demonizes Darwinism).  Chutzpah is not compatible with the scientific method.  Whatever the philosophical foundations for a coming age of European Man will be, it will be built over the rubble of the anti-scientific foundations of the existing liberal order.

Posted by Dasein on Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 09:22 PM in
Comments (34) | Tell-a-Friend

The BNP, the EHRC, and revealing a historical moment

The judge also accepted ‘powerful submissions’ from the Commission that the BNP’s proposed new constitution is likely to remain unlawful. We will be back in court in March where we hope to conclude this matter by ensuring that whatever constitution the BNP adopts does not break discrimination laws.

John Wadham, EHRC, quoted in a Commission press release following the BNP’s return to the county court today.

The two parts of this statement contain the entire purpose of the EHRC in its action against the BNP.  The first part is to make the party non-racial in its politics.  The second is to render it financially incapable of campaigning in the (May 6th) General Election.

It is part one - the exclusion of all reference to the native British in the party constitution - that is of significance, and more for what it reveals about the historical moment than any political or legal aspects.  In fact, I would go further and say that unless the EHRC pushes its luck to the point of taking out a prosecution against one of the BNP’s leaders for publicly speaking of Britain’s native peoples, none of the legal or political consequences of today’s ruling will do any real, lasting damage.  Instead, the party will simply hold the two AGMs required of it and the voting membership will come to the view that, to quote Lee Barnes:

The sole aim of us participating in the political process is to take power.

Amen to that.  Everything is now clarified.  We have reached a defining moment in the long process of racial destruction which began with the Atlee government turning its back on the people’s rights and instincts in 1948.  The BNP has stripped away everything but the one essential principle that it must fight, and fight, and fight.  The Establishment has, in attempting to force the discourse of the BNP to match its own, stripped away everything but the one essential principle that the native British must die as native Britons.  This is no longer about “fascism” or “the hard right” or even “hate”.  It is existential, and well enough put by a commenter to the BNP’s website named Rijker:

This is no longer your country.
You cannot have a culture of your own.
You can not represent yourselves in Parliament.
You are to be persecuted until you no longer exist.

Out of this moment will quickly emerge a new clarity and urgency in racialist discourse, and not the death of racialist discourse the EHRC would wish.  What would have been seen by the public as the most extreme and contentious interpretation of “immigration” - that of a designed genocide by population transfer - will slowly but surely become the accepted version of events.  And when that happens, a general awakening is close.

Inevitablism has just been given a huge shot in the arm.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 09:11 PM in British Politics
Comments (13) | Tell-a-Friend

At Last the 1948 Show (redux)

22 June 1948: the Empire Windrush docks at Tilbury with its ‘Sons of Empire’

With an Extraordinary General Meeting now scheduled for February 14th, it seems that the dénouement of the long drawn-out saga of the BNP’s ‘whites-only’ membership policy may be finally at hand. According to this BBC news item Nick Griffin was at the High Court in London earlier today pleading for an extension to the originally imposed deadline of January 28th.

The report does include some details of the proposed new membership criteria:

… BNP members are being asked to vote on a new constitution changing the membership criteria so that every member is “indigenous British by descent or origin” or “of any other descent or origin” and “bona fide supports and agrees with each of the Principles of the Party”.

… and of its revised Statement of Principles:

… : “We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence of the unity and of the integrity of the Indigenous British and of the government of… our ‘British Homeland’.”

It also states that the party is “implacably opposed to the promotion by any means of any form of integration or assimilation of any indigenous people, including the Indigenous British, which is likely to deprive such people of their integrity as a distinct people or the distinctiveness of their cultural values or of their ethnic or national identities or characteristics”.

As widely anticipated, the ‘back to 1948’ clause appears to have been quietly jettisoned, assurances given to the contrary by Lee John Barnes on these pages notwithstanding.

In case anyone is still unfamiliar with the term, ‘1948 Clause’ refers to this commitment included in the present Constitution:

SECTION 1: POLITICAL OBJECTIVES
...
2. The political objectives of the party are set out in the following Statement of Principles:-
...
(b) The British National Party stands for the preservation of the national and ethnic character of the British people and is wholly opposed to any form of racial integration between British and non-European peoples. It is therefore committed to stemming and reversing the tide of non-white immigration and to restoring, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the overwhelmingly white make up of the British population that existed in Britain prior to 1948.

More reports here and here. According to the latter, even this new, ‘modernised’ and sanitised constitution is unlikely to meet with the approval of the EHRC, let alone the BNP membership.

Posted by Dan Dare on Thursday, January 28, 2010 at 05:39 PM in
Comments (40) | Tell-a-Friend

And What is Being Given Up…

I won’t claim to know the particular politics of either of the two in the clip, a singer and her keyboardist, though at least for the sake of outward public consumption it is likely of a ‘liberal’ or Multi-Cultural persuasion...but if they were to grasp that the people they were as individuals a part of was being expected to give up their souls, and yes, even what they looked like...forever...so that an extremely self-centered and relative few, who the evidence would indicate are something along the lines of unreformed slavers, could make a quick but substantial profit with what in reality is the direct continuation of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade (ie ‘cheap labor’ so called) merely manifesting in another form, and with a for the most part fraudulent ‘asylum seeker’ system acting as a flimsy fig leaf for this, as with a great number of others from a lied to and heavily propagandized public, they might not be prepared to give up so much, so freely, and for the worst of reasons.

And that’s what sites such as this one are for...to let people know.

Posted by Alex on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at 06:50 PM in
Comments (23) | Tell-a-Friend

Beauty Alone Justifies Conservation

He comes close to saying it, but something stops him.  People too, and the peoples they are a part of, are also a part of nature in the positive sense of things.  Are they not also worth preserving, or is it only the proles and animals that are free with those who promote the ideology of Multi-Culturalism?

Natural aesthetes

Forget about usefulness, beauty alone is reason enough to justify conservation

George Monbiot
Tuesday January 13, 2004
The Guardian

Last week, the journal Nature published a report suggesting that, by 2050, around a quarter of the world’s animal and plant species could die out as a result of global warming. To these we must add the millions threatened by farming, logging, hunting, fishing and introduced species. The future is beginning to look a little lonely.

Does it matter? To most of those who govern us, plainly not. To most of the rest of us, the answer seems to be yes, but we are not quite sure why. We have little difficulty in recognising the importance of other environmental issues. Climate change causes droughts and floods, ozone depletion gives us skin cancer, diesel pollution damages our lungs. But, while most people feel that purging the world of its diversity of animals and plants is somehow wrong, the feeling precedes a rational explanation. For the past 30 years, the conservation movement has been trying to provide one. Its efforts have, for the most part, failed…

Biodiversity, in other words, matters because it matters. If we are to protect wildlife, we must do it for ourselves. We need not pretend that anything else is bidding us to do so. We need not pretend that anyone depends upon the king protea or the golden toad or the silky sifaka for their survival. But we can say that, as far as we are concerned, the world would be a poorer place without them.

Link to full article

Posted by Alex on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at 06:18 PM in
Comments (6) | Tell-a-Friend

The world is only White

by The Narrator

The ongoing debate/discussion about the pertinent steps to be taken to secure the sanctity and survival of the White race in America into the future continues its (seemingly) irrelevant pace.

Do we work within the system or try to reform it to our side?

Honestly, I’d say the answer is neither.

For one thing, the writing is on the proverbial wall, as this NYT article illustrates.  There is a clickable map at that site showing the percentage of minority students by state.

For another thing, it is entirely possible that, for a percentage of our ideological adversaries, the establishment of an official White Community (complete with social, economic and political advocacy) would be seen as the final victory over Western Civilization and Western Man.

After all, the pursuit of a “party” at this point is the pursuit of a chair at the table of what was once our own house. It is to psychologically and philosophically acquiesce ownership of our own civilization.

In that, I sincerely doubt the Left fears to see the rise of White Nationalism as a political option for White Americans who are, circa 2010, probably around 53% of the population of America. Once we become a White American Party we have accepted the terms and conditions of our enemies. We are, then, mere players in the new Gnostic world order of global community.

Put another way, when we accept the role as being yet another ethnic/cultural group WITHIN OUR OWN CIVILIZATION we have acknowledged defeat.

What then is our course of action?

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM in
Comments (51) | Tell-a-Friend

Borderless and red

There are, in the 20th century, only three ideologies that have managed to demonstrate that their principles are realistic in terms of their political-administrative implementation - these are liberalism, communism and fascism. As much as one may like to - it is impossible to name another model of society which would not be one of the forms of these ideologies and [which], at the same time, existed in reality. There are liberal countries, there are communist [countries] and there are fascist (nationalist) [countries]. Others are absent. And are impossible. In Russia, we have passed two ideological stages – the communist and the liberal. What remains is fascism.
---Aleksandr Dugin, Fascism - borderless and red

Posted by Søren Renner on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at 12:53 AM in
Comments (43) | Tell-a-Friend

The closing of the liberal mind

These days my relationship with the moderators of Comment is Free - Matt Seaton’s censorious defenders of the Guardian faithful - is in a bad way.  They know someone who means to cause their poor lambs ideological pain is out there.  They don’t like it, and they have their knives out.

Of course they are right.  I don’t log-on to engage with their flock in the spirit of fraternal Semitism and peace to all men and man-hating dykes that they intend.  Originally, CiF provided an opportunity to test our arguments against the little clutch of undeniably good minds that frequented it.  And one or two profitable and educational exchanges were had, for sure.  But the good minds grew weary and the moderators wary.  The immoderation began with a noticeable narrowing of the discourse perhaps a year ago.  References to the meaning for the English of miscegenation were excised more swiftly.  The meaning of minoritisation followed.  Lately the notion of ultimate and proximate values has gone too.  That and the terms “race-replacement” and “left-racism” are no more than invitations to the trigger-happy guardians of ideological purity.  The notion that the English have the same natural right as any other people to pass their ancestral land onto their own children seems to be too unimpeachable to delete.  For now.  But just this afternoon the perfectly respectable idea that violence in society enters at the most formative level of the common conception of the human, if that conception is partial, was deemed too offensive for the ba-bas.  Fifteen minutes of my writer’s life was wasted for nothing.

Give them their due, Matt’s boys have become ever more creative in interpreting the house rules to fit their agenda.  There are threads on which they memory-hole comments by the dozen, as often as not where the lead article has been ghosted for a government minister.  From my experience, the great majority of deletions also result in the ultimate sanction in red just about the comment box: “oh yea, further offence shall ne’er stain this temple of false middle-class virtues.  Thou art modded.”

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, January 26, 2010 at 01:18 AM in Liberalism & the Left
Comments (120) | Tell-a-Friend

Latest score: EDL 1 UAF 0

On the day that the honest journeymen of Stoke City eliminated the Afro-continental nancy-boys of Arsenal FC from the FA Cup, 1500 supporters of the English Defence League took their anti-Muslim counter-Jihad to the streets of Stoke-on-Trent on Saturday, for what is probably the largest EDL outing to date. From all accounts the Antifa response was relatively muted.

Trouble at Stoke-on-Trent English Defence League rally

The following clip was taken in a city centre pub to which dozens of EDL supporters had repaired.

The Cap’n will be pleased to note that the old footie anthem ‘There were ten German bombers in the air’ has now been updated to ‘There were ten muslim bombers …’.

Is it possible to conceive of a scenario in which 49er fans would ever abandon their pre-match tailgate partying for direct action along similar lines?

Posted by Dan Dare on Sunday, January 24, 2010 at 06:08 PM in
Comments (43) | Tell-a-Friend

Flags of the United States and British East India Company

There is a presumed history of things that is taught to most, that even the less powerful from amongst the elites believe...and then there is another history of these events, that only a relative few and powerful know.  It is important for those wishing to see not only the preservation of their own people, but the other various peoples of the world as well that make up humanity, to have an excellent grasp of the past so as to see clearly as to what to do in the present.  Hence entries here such as this...

Reflecting the nature of the ‘New Order’ of things to be established on the earth as proclaimed by the Great Seal of the United States, and though unbeknownst by most to this day, one of the first flags chosen to represent the 1776 Revolution by founding elite revolutionaries is the ‘Grand Union’ flag which is identical to that of the multi-national corporation, the British East India Company. 

‘The famed “Grand Union” flag hoisted near Washington’s headquarters at Cambridge on 1 January 1776 turned out to be exactly the same as the flag that the East India Company had used ... on the other side of the world ... since 1701. The design is essentially a red ensign (minus, of course, the X of St. Patrick at that time) with the red field divided into 13 red-and-white stripes: the same pattern as the later U.S. flag, once the canton changed to “a new constellation.“‘

US Grand Union/British East India Company Flag (1776) - Modern United States Flag (2010)

Source
Source

Continued...

Posted by Alex on Saturday, January 23, 2010 at 07:29 PM in
Comments (8) | Tell-a-Friend

On the Terms ‘Racist’ and ‘Racism’

‘Anti-racist’ would be more accurately referred to as ‘anti-race’, as in they rather dysfunctionally do not like the fact (or cannot deal with it) that the various races of man do indeed exist, often as a very large part of what constitutes a people’s ethnicity.  In the 19th century, when the variant of slavery euphemistically referred to as cheap labor met serious resistance across the world, both from those preyed upon as a source and those who by diktat were on the receiving end, that the various peoples of the world naturally wished to preserve that physical part of themselves known as race was certainly seen as a major hindrance to the obtaining of the profits to be had....It is also an issue of control.  If they can genocide (in the truest sense of that modern term) all the races and ethnicities of man by ‘mixing’ them away and create an artificial new single race of man, it would make humanity a lot easier to control, in the same way a small boy finds it easier to control just one marble rather than a profusion of them.

An anti-race (aka ‘anti-racism’) protest in Rome in 2008.  Adding insult to injury, those already exploited by Capitalism as cheap labor or the flimsy fig leaf for the same, the easily 95% plus fraudulent asylum seeker, are exploited and manipulated once again against the indigenous Italian population...who might just stand in the way of the profits to be made.

The terms racist and racism are being used by Marxists (rad/libs, multic-cultists, etc) specifically as part of the deconstructing (aka destroying) process of European peoples.  Trotsky is the person who first used the word “racism” in the 1920’s.  Being that European peoples have been homogenous for thousands of years it is entirely natural that would be a big part of our identity as peoples. In an effort to destroy that massive part of our identity as Europeans the entirely legitimate term race has been married to negativity with the words racist and racism and as has been stated been specifically aimed at our peoples to enhance its destructive effect...a verbal smart bomb if you will. The gold ring for the folks who promote the newly invented words is when Europeans themselves use the terms in conversation or even to describe themselves. 

Most people among the European ancestried general public see the two terms as referring to abuse between races (particularly Europeans see it this way). Those who promote the terms (ie multi-cultists, rad-libs, reds, non-Europeans, etc) see it as meaning any expression by Europeans of their unique identity, bad or good. Even the simple acknowledgment that European peoples exist is slapped with the label.  Those we deal with have pronounced that only Europeans can be racist or engage in racism.

Continued...

Posted by Alex on Friday, January 22, 2010 at 05:34 PM in
Comments (14) | Tell-a-Friend

The Mormons and the Danite Order.

I watched several hours of a documentary on “The Mormons,” a PBS special. I have been aware of the Mormons or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church), but I have not taken the time to research this particular religion at any depth. However, they do seem to have some threads in the structure of the Church that may be of interest.

First, the Church is very secretive with a great deal of ritual and demands made on its members. It was interesting that when I tried to get an e-book from Amazon on the Mormons on my Kindle, it said that the book was not available to anyone in the United States. Very strange for Amazon to allow the Church to restrict sales in such a way. Anyway, I did order a hard copy of The Mormon Menace, by John Doyle Lee, who was a member of the Danite Order, was involved in the Meadows Massacre in 1857, and died for his crimes in 1877. Apparently, the Danite Order was or even still is the martial enforcing arm of the Mormon’s. They will go to any lengths to eliminate enemies either within the Church or out of the Church.

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Thursday, January 21, 2010 at 01:02 PM in White Communities & Micro-Economies
Comments (23) | Tell-a-Friend

Blogosphere Abuzz! CVH Now Famous!

http://rybell7.blogspot.com/2009/12/spoiled-white-boys.html

... After we went to the Kremlin, we met his friend, this miserable little Scottish man with an awful mullet. .... So we’re at this bar, and someone brings up Switzerland recent ban on minarets. ...About an hour later, after various racist soliloquies, I finally got up and left after Constantin von Hoffmeister (yeah that’s his real name) started yelling about his desire for a “Fortess Europe”. ...hearing a German guy with a name like his start invoking Nazi ideology was a little to much for me.

...Anyway, it gets better, we decided that now if he’s getting name drops on other discussion forums he’s worth a goog search. Ohhhhhhhhhhhh guys, here is the first link that comes up:

http://nationalfuturism.org/

For those of you less interested in reading it, the site is a collection of his poetry and rants. Some highlights: “Happy Birthday, Herr Hitler”, “Our Motherland - Imperium Europa”, “Aryan Army Faction”, “The White Power Cycle”, “Attack of the Killer Jews!”, “The Monkey Way"[.]

... people with these regrettable opinions are really nothing more than [redacted]…

Posted by Søren Renner on Wednesday, January 20, 2010 at 03:56 PM in
Comments (43) | Tell-a-Friend

Oi! Who’re you calling non-indigenous?!

More bad news for the dwindling number of remaining fans of the Paleolithic Continuity Theory (PCT) in the form of a newly-published study in the PLoS Biology Journal. Summaries are provided in the Guardian and here in the Scientific American:

Sowing their seeds: Neolithic farmers spawned most European males

By Katherine Harmon

Agriculture emerged on the human cultural scene about 10,000 years ago, spreading rapidly through Europe from the Near East to the British Isles in about 4,000 years. But did this world-changing technology get disseminated via an expanding wave of industrious farmers or through word-of-mouth among local hunter-gatherer populations?

To help answer this much-debated question, researchers have peered into the genetics of modern Europeans for clues. Mark Jobling of the University of Leicester in the U.K. and his colleagues found not only that agriculture seems to have spread westward via a new group of Neolithic people from the Near East, but also that these new farmers were incredibly successful with the local ladies, leaving their genetic traces in their modern male descendents.

“We focused on the commonest Y-chromosome lineage in Europe,” Jobling said in a prepared statement. The team analyzed a single haplotype, R1b1b2 (which is carried by about 110 million men in Europe today) from 2,574 European men whose families had been living in the same location for at least two generations. This common haplotype, however, is not randomly distributed across the continent. “It follows a gradient from south-east to north-west,” he said. About 12 percent of men in eastern Turkey have it, whereas some 85 percent of men carry it in Ireland.

Others have previously speculated that this distribution was due to earlier, Paleolithic expansion from Africa. But Jobling and his fellow researchers asserted that it reflects a rapid, more recent genetic spread during the Neolithic—one that has a “striking” correlation with known Neolithic sites. “The geographical distribution of diversity within the haplogroup is best explained by its spread from a single source from the Near East via [Turkey] during the Neolithic,” the authors concluded in their study, which was published online January 19 in PLoS Biology.

“In total, this means that more than 80 percent of European Y chromosomes descend from incoming farmers,” geneticist Patricia Balaresque, also of the University of Leicester and lead study author, said in a prepared statement. “In contrast, most maternal genetic lineages seem to descend from hunter-gatherers.”

How could these early European ancestors come from such different groups? “To us, this suggests a reproductive advantage for farming males over indigenous hunter-gatherer males during the switch from hunting and gathering to farming,” Balaresque said. “Maybe, back then, it was just sexier to be a farmer.”

 
It’s been a bitter pill to swallow for those European males (like Nick Griffin) who prided themselves on their ancestral connections to the ‘indigenous’ peoples. It turns out that Griffin, like 80% of western European males, is almost certainly not a descendant of the intrepid Cro-Magnon hunter-gatherers who, 12,000 years ago re-populated the continent from the Ice Age refugia in Cantabria, Italy and the Balkans, but rather of parvenu Turkish farmers instead.

And immigrants to boot! Ooh the shame of it!

The full report is available here.

Posted by Dan Dare on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 at 11:33 PM in
Comments (38) | Tell-a-Friend

Obama! The Musical

HOPE, an ‘interactive musical,’ opened in Frankfurt on Sunday evening.  If you’re willing to pay at least 77 euros, you can sit in one of the 1200 seats with embedded drums.  Germans paying to bang on bongo drums in celebration of a Negro president in charge of 60,000 troops stationed on German soil, it’s like a bad film, or at least a comedy.  Reminds me of the excellent futuristic satire Idiocracy.  (you can watch it for free here)

The reviews for HOPE have been fairly mixed, with some critics saying it a bit long (i.e. boring).  Maybe they could have lightened it up, stolen some ideas from Idiocracy, like President Camacho’s song and dance in the ‘House of Representin.’ I couldn’t find the proper clip on YouTube with just that scene, but here are some clips that include it (unfortunately, there’s music dubbed over it).

Continued...

Posted by Dasein on Tuesday, January 19, 2010 at 09:05 PM in
Comments (9) | Tell-a-Friend

Rod Liddle does bigotry.  But is it really worse than hypocrisy?

Five years ago the distinctly loose journalistic cannon that is Rod Liddle opined on things he shouldn’t say about black people.  It was one of those moments when the thought crosses one’s mind, “what does this person think privately?” Now we know:

Former Today editor Rod Liddle under fire over ‘racist’ posts on football supporters’ website

Former Today programme editor Rod Liddle has been accused of racism after writing a series of inflammatory messages on a football supporters’ website.

Mr Liddle, who now works for The Spectator magazine and is tipped to become the next editor of The Independent, used crude language to argue for the axeing of all black-only organisations.
He also contributed to a debate in which supporters demanded violent attacks on a black footballer.

The 49-year-old left the messages on Millwall Online - an independent website unconnected to the club - under the username ‘monkeymfc’.

The first message was written in October, when he contributed to a debate about whether the BNP should admit non-white members.

He wrote: ‘There’s thousands of organisations catering exclusively to black and asian minorities. **** ‘em, close them down. Why do blacks need a forum of their own? As a power base and cash cow for ****s and in order to perpetuate the myth of widespread discrimination.’

The next day he joined in a thread about a row between Millwall’s Neil Harris and the Ghanaian-English player Kevin Amankwaah, who had accused Harris of racially abusing him - an allegation Harris denies.

After abusive comments about Amankwaah by other users, Liddle writes he has heard Harris’s alleged comment was: ‘**** off you spearchucking African ****.’

Later that month, another comment written by monkeymfc appears in a thread called ‘Channel 4 claiming blacks are thick’, about a documentary alleging racial differences in intelligence.

In comments Liddle strongly denies writing, the contributor says: ‘On average a little under 10 per cent thicker than whites; 15 per cent thicker than east Asians. I thought everyone knew, too. Some argument about cultural bias of tests, but same results come up in US.’

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, January 17, 2010 at 11:54 PM in Media
Comments (12) | Tell-a-Friend

‘One day, on the model of the United States of America…’

‘...a United States of Europe will come into being.’ George Washington (1732-1799) in a letter to French revolutionary Lafayette.

There is a presumed history of things that is taught to most, that even the less powerful from amongst the elites believe...and then there is another history of these events, that only a relative few and powerful know.  It is important for those wishing to see not only the preservation of their own people, but the other various peoples of the world as well that make up humanity, to have an excellent grasp of the past so as to see clearly as to what to do in the present.  Hence entries here such as this...

As heralded by the 1776 Revolution and proclaimed on the Great Seal of the United States, a ‘New Order’ of things is to be established on the earth.  This order is to be based on the British Empire’s New World colonies (the thirteen) with their accompanying ideology initially called ‘Continentalism’ and in time ‘Manifest Destiny’, the premier geopolitical unit being the continental super-state, democratic republican in form, and ‘free trade’ to be promoted within and without, as modeled by the United States of [North America].  Within the thirteen colonies an already existent, largely natural and organic individualism, would be exploited and within the US this would be replaced by the promotion of an artificial and hyper-individualism.  Something similar would be the case with the collectivism of the controlled counter-revolution to the American, the ‘Red Republicanism’ of France, and then (particularly evident) with the Russia of the USSR.  For the most part the construction of these continental super-states across the world during the next 150 years would be spear headed militarily, generalled by Washington in North America, Napoleon in Europe, Bolivar and San Martín in South America, Trotsky in Eurasia (ie the Soviet Union), and somewhat more politically by Sun Yat Sen in China, and later militarily by Mao when it went the path of Red Republicanism instead of the American model.  In Africa, in the mid to latter 20th century, this effort at creating a continental super-state would be largely a political effort.

Slavery, a scourge upon man, and practiced by a self-centered relative few at most everyone else’s great expense, would as it was in the world of 1776 and 1789, remain a primary, some might say central, part of the economic system of this New Order that was being established, now manifesting itself in a different, expanded, and far more virulent and destructive form, known euphamistically as ‘cheap labor’.

Europe would get special attention by both US and UK elites, in the construction of the continental super-state known initially as the United States of Europe, and now known as the European Union.  In the same way that the US and the American Union are the same, so are the US of Europe and the European Union…

Continued...

Posted by Alex on Friday, January 15, 2010 at 06:23 PM in
Comments (10) | Tell-a-Friend