News Date 6th May 2005: Reduced Labour majority not enough to persuade Howard to stay

Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 09 April 2005 21:18.

Suleymann Kufr, London
Guardian staff reporter

Michael Howard today resigned as leader of the Conservative Party, after leading the Tories to a third successive defeat.

Speaking outside Conservative Central Office in London, Mr Howard said, “It is vital for the party to reflect fully on the decision of the electorate and on the direction the Conservative Party must now take.  That direction should be the responsibility of a new leader who can build on the very substantial progress we, as a party, have made in the past eighteen months.”

It is eighteen months to the day since Mr Howard replaced Mr Ian Duncan Smith as Tory leader in what was a one horse race.

Mr Howard claimed that his party was “back in business” but he also spoke of the electoral mountain which it still has to climb.

He said, “I believe, as I think most of those involved also believe, that we fought a very good and effective campaign.  We did not win.  Nevertheless, we are back in business, which many people said was impossible eighteen months ago.  From here it is distinctly possible, if still difficult of course, for us to reduce the rest of Mr Blair’s parliamentary majority.  Whoever the party now chooses to lead that effort will have not only my complete support but, I am certain, a united party behind him.”

Mr Howard will stand down when the party has elected a successor.

Speaking outside 10 Downing Street today, Tony Blair praised Mr Howard’s “energy” and “determination”.  “I wish him well,” he added, “He has been a formidable opponent in the House.”

At the latest count the Tories have won 242 seats, gaining seventy-six more constituencies than the party’s 2001 total.  Mr Howard conceded defeat to the prime minister, Tony Blair, but said Labour was “a divided party that had been re-elected with no public enthusiasm”.

His comments came after senior Conservative figures, including the shadow Home Secretary, David Davies, urged a period of reflection.

Mr Davies is now the bookmakers’ 11-10 hot favourite to succeed Mr Howard.  The party Chairman Dr Liam Fox is installed at 5/1 with talented youth represented by David Cameron at 7/1.  Odds of 10/1 were offered on Shadow Chancellor Oliver Letwin and Shadow Foreign Secretary Michael Ancram, and 16/1 for Shadow Health Secretary Andrew Lansley.

Mr Davies today refused to be drawn on his prospects for the leadership, saying only “In the aftermath of the election and so soon after Michael’s resignation announcement I do not feel this is the time to discuss his succession.  That will come in due course.”

Baroness Thatcher spoke warmly of Mr Howard’s achievements during his brief spell as Tory leader.  She said, “I think he did a wonderful job, better than anyone thought possible.  Four years ago, when William Hague resigned, I said we will be back and so we are.  Now I am saying that in four year’s time we shall be back in government”.

She said Labour’s victory had been a “very disappointing result for the country” though she praised the Tory election campaign.

Mr Kenneth Clarke, a fellow minister to Mr Howard in both the Thatcher and Major governments, also paid tribute to the outgoing Tory leader.  But he cautioned that it would take more than another change of leader to oust Labour at the next opportunity.

He said, “I pay tribute to Michael Howard’s political skills.  He had the wisdom to realise that the public is not as gripped by the Europe issue as politicians are.  I think the agenda on which we fought the election was the public’s agenda.  The public is interested in health, education, transport and crime, and we talked about all those.  Michael will leave us far stronger than he found us.  But I do caution his successor against the attractions of a “one-more-heave” mentality.  We must go further in being relevant to the whole of the electorate.  The Conservative party must look more like the country we wish to lead.”

Sources close to Mr Howard have suggested that his decision to retire now has less to do with the election result than with the need to give whoever will lead the party into the next election time also to prepare for next year’s referendum on the European Constitution.  The polls consistently suggest that the No campaign will win comfortably, a highly favourable launch-pad for the new Tory leader.

John Prescott, Labour Deputy Leader, said he “couldn’t understand the rush” with Mr Howard’s decision.  He said, “They might as well hang on to him because in three years time they will go and ditch whoever it is they select now and ask Michael Howard back again.”

It is rumoured that Mr Howard might retire from politics altogether within the next twelve months.  Although he has always been regarded within Westminster as one of those MP’s singularly devoted to political life he is thought to have several projects outside politics that he wishes to pursue.  He was first elected Member of Parliament for Folkestone and Hythe in 1983.



Comments:


1

Posted by Andrew L on Sat, 09 Apr 2005 22:39 | #

I wonder if there Time displacement Machine can go back in time, there are some issues I, and others I’m sure, would like to deal with.


2

Posted by Guessedworker on Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:14 | #

Actually, Andrew, it’s not the Gruaniad’s time displacement machine - it’s mine.  I made it up.

Thing is, this election is b-o-r-i-n-g.  So I’ve done all my election blogging early to get it out of the way.

I predict:-

Labour 355 seats
Conservative 242
Liberal Democrat 35
Others 26

OK, so now I can forget all about it and think about any damned thing I like.  Bloody marvellous.


3

Posted by Geoff Beck on Sat, 09 Apr 2005 23:54 | #

G’ker:

I’ve seen the prime minister’s ‘question time’ as its called over here. Most Americans are, when the first see the event, shocked to discover a political discourse above grunts, shouts, and cliches.

Still, and this is true for the U.S., I don’t see any substantial differences between the parties.

It seems only to be a game of one upmanship, and who has spent more, or if in a different context, less; and of course endless promises to the sick, wierd, and failed.

Oh, this Prescott fellow, he’s a bull-moose, I can see that. Doesn’t have that soft touch of the ‘grinning pixie’.


4

Posted by Phil Peterson on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:04 | #

Oh, this Prescott fellow, he’s a bull-moose, I can see that.

Hes a bloody sharp man with great wit, may I remind you there Geoffrey.


5

Posted by Andrew L on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 00:33 | #

Don’t you just love those pictures, Deputy Prime minister punches a Protestor,I wonder if it was a wet liberal on the recieving end, Mind you Prescott must have a fist like a wet sponge.The egg head was still standing.


6

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 09:12 | #

Prescott is a former amateur boxer and a former steward on a cruise-liner - though he describes himself as a former merchant seaman.  In the innumerable bars and restaurants around Westminster Conservative MP’s are not above clicking their fingers at him and calling out “Waiter?”

Whatever the outcoime of this election, afterwards he will become a former cabinet minister.

Geoff,

Your assessment of party differences is certainly right.  In the highly improbable event of a Conservative win the question that this blog would be asking is:-

Why are the Conservatives in power as committed to the Multi-Cult as Labour was?


7

Posted by Effra on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:53 | #

Guessed: Fine-tune your machine to encompass the ejection of Howard and Letwin from their rural constituencies by Liberal Democrats.

Tory canvassers admitted: “We were surprised by the strength of feeling among Middle England voters about the Iraq War, and our rather muddled position did not reassure them. Charles Kennedy tipped the balance by exploiting his principled and consistent opposition. Voters don’t see why our troops are still being left in harm’s way out there.”

Another factor leading to Mr Howard’s narrow defeat was the impact of illegal immigration in his Kent seat. The canvasser said “People don’t just want the floodgates closed, they want these Muslim troublemakers kicked out and the blacks told to shape up or go back to the West Indies. Of course, we had trouble catering to that feeling because Mr Howard is the son of an immigrant and the grandson of an illegal immigrant. Anyway, Trevor Phillips firmly instructed all the respectable parties that they were to play down the immigration issue—it’s too important to be left to elected politicians.”


8

Posted by dearieme on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:06 | #

If he gets back into the Commons, Malcolm Rifkind should be a decent candidate for Conservative leader.  Unless you think that Labour have played the anti-semitic card so skilfully that the Tories won’t risk another Jewish leader, in which case you can delete Oliver Letwin too.  Nice guy, Mr Blair.


9

Posted by Guessedworker on Sun, 10 Apr 2005 17:16 | #

I don’t think that the party would worry if the right man was Jewish.  I do think they would prefer him to be in a safer seat than Howard, Letwin or Rifkind, though.  Surely also, Rifkind would only be fit for consideration if Howard wins or stays on in defeat and gives him one of the major portfolios - which, of course, is the only type of portfolio a man of his quality and experience could be given.  That, though, may also depend on what happens in West Dorset - and now we are talking about the Jewish factor, because I don’t think the party would welcome three of its four most senior figures being Jewish.  In politics there always has to be a limit.



Post a comment:


Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Note: You should copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting it, so that it will not be lost if the session times out.

Remember me


Next entry: And how much have the victims and survivors of the Bataan Death March and their dependents received?
Previous entry: The Old Kent Road

image of the day

Existential Issues

DNA Nations

Categories

Contributors

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Immigration

Islamist Threat

Anti-white Media Networks

Audio/Video

Crime

Economics

Education

General

Historical Re-Evaluation

Controlled Opposition

Nationalist Political Parties

Science

Europeans in Africa

Of Note

Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:26. (View)

Landon commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:36. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:58. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:46. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:19. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:53. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:26. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:57. (View)

Landon commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:50. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 22:36. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:51. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:20. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:18. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:55. (View)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Wed, 24 Apr 2024 07:29. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 18:48. (View)

weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Tue, 23 Apr 2024 04:24. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:54. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:12. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:44. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:34. (View)

weremight commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:42. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:27. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:01. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:52. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:23. (View)

Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:07. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:39. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:38. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20. (View)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:01. (View)

Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:31. (View)

Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:52. (View)

James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:21. (View)

Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:25. (View)

affection-tone