A Deserved Comeuppance: Depiggicization of the Island

Posted by Søren Renner on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 03:05 PM in
Comments (22) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by q on May 31, 2009, 09:02 PM | #

Amateurish!

Posted by danielj on May 31, 2009, 09:22 PM | #

Political propaganda is much shorter and more direct.

Perhaps it is because of our shorter attention span.

Posted by danielj on May 31, 2009, 09:24 PM | #

Should read: “Political propaganda in America is much shorter and more direct.”

Posted by white-history.com UNDER ATTACK! on May 31, 2009, 10:13 PM | #

The website http://www.white-history.com/ keeps going down - I think it is likely that the website is under constant cyber-attack by anti-White forces (especially organized Jewry).

Posted by Guessedworker on May 31, 2009, 11:01 PM | #

This video ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LpDrgrxrR3c&feature=player_embedded

... of an anti-Muslim extremist protest in Luton might set the pulse racing a bit faster.  The source of the anger here was the protest mounted two or three weeks earlier by bearded people from far away as British soldiers paraded through Luton town centre.

The lad’s demo was taken over by a second group, some of whom resorted to violence.  It was not very extreme - just nine arrested.  But that didn’t bother the Daily Mail, which had a field day.

It followed up with a report about how Luton’s “moderate” Muslims had driven their extremist brothers off the streets.  Golly, aren’t those moderates just wunnerful.  Not like our extremist hooligans.  Let’s all be nice to moderate Muslims.

Posted by Frank on May 31, 2009, 11:56 PM | #

I really like this video. It reminds of one of those Power Rangers episodes - which probably don’t air much anymore.

It’s not threatening or alarming - would surely quell the anti-BNP programming that’s being drilled into folks’ heads constantly.

Nearly every major British politician is an extremist who wants to dump massive waves of immigrants into Britain, and many of these politicians are crooks, and yet it’s the BNP that is supposed to be so shocking and dangerous.

Well if the BNP is also dangerous, then why not at least vote a few in so the two extreme camps can balance each other out. And then this enlightened, impossible, moderate ideal that all respectable types trumpet could be brought about… right?

But no, no. No one likes the current politicians, and everyone believes the current policy is headed for disaster. But gasp, gag, shiver if the BNP wins somehow something magically worse will happen. No one knows just what will happen, but everyone knows it’d be bad.

So, wrapping it up… I like this video because it quells this programming. Suddenly the BNP is a goofy, fun-loving party that puts out children’s videos involving dancing pig characters.

Posted by danielj on June 01, 2009, 12:20 AM | #

Suddenly the BNP is a goofy, fun-loving party that puts out children’s videos involving dancing pig characters.

I’m not sure.

It definitely has “amateur hour” written all over it and although “goofiness” can be well done, it isn’t done well here.

Posted by Frank on June 01, 2009, 01:12 AM | #

Well… a lot of the other recent videos have been well done at least - judging by the ones that weren’t removed before I could view them.

Posted by Søren Renner on June 01, 2009, 01:39 AM | #

There’s no need to be coy, danielj. Put your modesty aside and post a link to your own work! I’m sure your vids are much, much better. Do let us watch them!

Posted by danielj on June 01, 2009, 01:43 AM | #

Was my criticism not constructive enough?

Posted by Frank on June 01, 2009, 04:02 AM | #

No criticism until after June 4.

Is white-history.com really going down? That’s a shame - that site’s been around for awhile and influenced MANY people. I suspect more could be added, but just having that up I suspect has a huge cumulative effect.

I pestered the author to add something about Heyerdahl several years ago. I fear he blocked me because I didn’t want to do any actual research but rather expected him to take the time to find these comments contained within based on my largely anonymous email.

Heyerdahl isn’t a WN, but there are diamonds within his work nevertheless. I posted a very few here - really should complete that when time avails though it’d take me several weekends (to go through each book).

Posted by danielj on June 01, 2009, 09:25 AM | #

How do the elections work?

Are these just council elections?

Posted by Guessedworker on June 01, 2009, 09:52 AM | #

Daniel,

There are two sets of elections on Thursday.  One is for a tranche of English local authorities:-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/8048224.stm

These are standard council elections of the type which the BNP has been fighting with increasing effect at the single by-election level.  They tend to do less well at these major events.

The voting system in use here is First Past The Post.

The other election taking place on Thursday is the European Parliament election:-

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8040446.stm

These are being held across all 27 member states of the Union.  The voting system varies across the Union, but is all one form or other of Proportional Representation.

Nationalist parties are anticipated to do well across Europe.  I do not know what tricks the Establishment has played to degrade the nationalist threat elsewhere, but plainly there is a possibility that in Britain the BNP vote will be damaged.  We shall know on Sunday when results for every member state will be released.

Posted by danielj on June 01, 2009, 10:06 AM | #

Thanks GW.

I think de Tocqueville was right (I think it was him) when he said that governments are at their weakest when they start to reform and I’m not sure England is in the process of “reform” at the moment.

The election of a third party, even if it isn’t the BNP, is an extremely good sign, but slight reforms toward the direction of limiting the immigration of racial others will be the real sign that the electoral chances for BNP victory are truly possible.

Posted by danielj on June 01, 2009, 10:07 AM | #

I guess I should say fourth party?

Posted by Dasein on June 01, 2009, 10:27 AM | #

The election of a third party, even if it isn’t the BNP, is an extremely good sign, but slight reforms toward the direction of limiting the immigration of racial others will be the real sign that the electoral chances for BNP victory are truly possible.

In France, lip service to immigration reform is what helped get Sarkozy into power.  He promises to get tough on illegal immigrants or encourages everyone to miscegenate based on his mood or what his handlers whisper into his ear.  I don’t think any alternative to the BNP is good.  Their policy on repatriation is light-years ahead of anything I’ve seen from other parties.  However, I also thought the pig video was a bit awkward and juvenile.  Who know though, maybe it appeals to the people whose vote they are trying to get.  It’s sometimes hard to guess what people will like.

Posted by Dasein on June 01, 2009, 10:39 AM | #

In France, I’m thinking specifically of the policy of using DNA tests to get rid of illegal immigrants.  The problem is that the system is so permissive that it’s easy to find some minor measure that will soothe public outrage.  BNP skipped the foreplay and went straight to the essential issue- getting non-Whites to leave Britain.  Massive kudos to them for that.  They can produce all the pig videos they want, I’ll still have enormous respect for them.

Posted by danielj on June 01, 2009, 09:01 PM | #

They can produce all the pig videos they want, I’ll still have enormous respect for them.

Of course!

We have nothing comparable here.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 01, 2009, 09:18 PM | #

I dunno, I liked that video.  Good post, Soren.  I see what everyone’s saying, but .... I still liked it!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 02, 2009, 09:20 PM | #

A VFR correspondent who is the BNP candidate in one of the local council elections June 4 writes,

”I have never known anything like it, there are anti BNP stories and articles in the national press literally on a daily basis. They must be really scared.”

( http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/013278.html )

Those with the guiltiest consciences are doubtless the most scared.  Good.  That’s as it should be:  after the party ends and all the damage is assessed comes the calling to account.

Posted by antistate on June 09, 2009, 05:36 AM | #

The website http://www.white-history.com/ keeps going down - I think it is likely that the website is under constant cyber-attack by anti-White forces (especially organized Jewry).

Then organized Jewry is doing us all a favor. 

The Stormfront version of history deserves nothing but derision—except that more feeble minds in the movement take it as gospel.

Posted by Astroloji on June 09, 2009, 10:28 AM | #

Thank you very much…

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)

captcha shown here

Next entry: On the political class

Previous entry: Jesus, hubris.

image of the day

Existential Issues

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view)

Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view)

Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view)

GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view)

Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view)

qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view)

Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view)

Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:52 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa