A research note--Democratic campaign contributions of CEOs: Jewish or industry interests?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 12, 2007, 01:02 PM | #

The paper’s final conclusion:

DISCUSSION

In 1972, investment bankers were the only identifiable members of Ferguson’s New Deal coalition to support the Democrats. Given this fact, it is unlikely that an industry-based realignment of the Democratic Party was the primary reason for the demise of the Democrats in the late 1970s. Other mental legislation emerged in the South (Broyles, 1993; Domhoff, 1990; Shelley, 1983). At the same time, the conservatism of American corporate elites increased and business became more proactive during the 1970s and the 1980s (Su et al., 1995). As the United States shifted to the right, the Democratic Party suffered electoral and financial setbacks.

By 1992, the Democratic Party had partially recovered from the slump in the 1980s. However, there is little evidence that business support of the Democratic Party reflected any clear industry-based economic interests. This is not to say that the economic interests of businessmen, company-specific or industry-wide, are not determinants of political participation. Business donors “invest” in both parties to promote pro-business policies. Undoubtedly, the precipitous increase in Democratic contributions by Jewish Investment bankers in 1992 was partially due to Clinton’s conservative fiscal policies, which included reduction of the federal deficit. However, because candidate selection in electoral politics is only loosely tied to policy, motives in addition to economic ones influence individual support of candidates. This explains why the only enduring source of business support for the Democrats has been the Jewish community. Regardless of occupation, Jewish elites are more socially liberal than their non-Jewish counterparts (Lerner et al.,1989). Jewish businessmen often emerge as major contributors to the Democratic Party because their social and religious concerns, not their economic interests, differ from gentiles.

This gets back to the phenomenon of wealthy Jews paying to protect and advance Jewish group interests such as race-replacement of Euros (forcing racially incompatible immigration on Euro-majority countries until all Euros in them are turned into non-whites, which makes Jews feel a lot better — and happens to be a form of genocide) and wealthy Euros refusing to pay to protect and advance Euro group interests such as resisting forced race-replacement of Euros in Euro countries.  If 40% of billionaires are Jews (which, we are told, is the figure) and 60% are Euros the Jews shouldn’t be winning — unless, that is, Euro billionaires refuse to promote Euro interests, in which case the Jewish billionaires win by default.  “Who pays the piper calls the tune” is an old rule you just can’t ignore or get around.

Posted by a Finn on March 12, 2007, 03:27 PM | #

If there is determined, coordinated minority, which has persistent direction, inside majority individualistic big soft blob, the minority will eventually determine the direction for the blob.

There is at least two kinds of coordination among the jews:

Large scale coordination among the masses. It works somewhat like our Christmas. In certain time/situation large number of people do the same things. In jews it is based on their culture/religion and also likely on their genetic predisposition, which creates a basis. Unlike our Christmas, their large scale coordination contributes much more advantages to their community. Jews already know in almost every situation what to do.

More intensive coordination, based on communities, networks, friendships, deals etc. These become more prevalent in the higher hierarchy.

Considering this article, one must ask: How we coordinate our monies and our politics better? How do we circumvent our lack of resources? How we become as much as possible independent from money and it’s effects and at same time use it as much as possible to our advantage? What are the weak and strong points of money? Where are the intersections of money and it’s power and how can we influence them maximally? Can some of us find jobs in intersections of money? How to gather the maximal amount of useful inside information about monies movements?

This time I had time just to ask.

Posted by a Finn on March 12, 2007, 03:37 PM | #

I have to add two more questions. What are the weak and strong points of those persons, who have lots of money? How can we influence them maximally?

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on March 12, 2007, 08:22 PM | #

If there is determined, coordinated minority, which has persistent direction, inside majority individualistic big soft blob, the minority will eventually determine the direction for the blob.

What’s so odd about this is I have to explain it to “skeptics” all the time, but it’s something so simple even a child can understand (the cliche of the trio of bullies shaking down kids for lunch money), and everyone knows it instinctively.

If 40% of billionaires are Jews (which, we are told, is the figure) and 60% are Euros

I was just quoting that last night - the figure is 45% of the Forbes list of the 400 richest Americans.  I don’t know how ANYONE not in the know can read that and not shut his yap and go running for the stacks to reevaluate reality...unless he’s just not interested in the same sorts of things western men are.

http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol3no2/km-understanding.html

Of course, there are more players involved than just Euros and jews in that group.

Posted by a Finn on March 13, 2007, 11:14 AM | #

Additions: Jews are always on all parties of the situation, also those that oppose Jews. They influence the situation from all directions. These range from active determined influence, to facilitation, to not resisting the jews on the other party or giving up to their demands. Not all jews are part of jewish policies, but enough are. As a group, contemporary Whites are so weak, that not all jews have to participate.

To Svyatoslav: I concur with what you said and we should not blind ourselves with jews to not see the influence of many other groups, despite jews’ speciality.

Posted by Al Ross on March 13, 2007, 01:20 PM | #

Dont worry Svi, as soon as the Jews finish ruining the US they will turn their attention to the near-future source of gullible suckers, China. Sadly for the Chosen they will meet the world’s oldest continuous civilisation, an implacable organism which hasnt succumbed to the W Lindsay Wheeler world of Semitic fairy-tales and its obvious and fatuous continuum, Christianity.

Posted by Al Ross on March 13, 2007, 01:31 PM | #

Apologies for the above egregious lapse in grammarian standards.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on March 13, 2007, 07:23 PM | #

Finn, I take a middle road on the JQ, at least in terms of those who are remotely sane on matters European.  (no, that’s not because I’m a middle-roader - I see no inherent value in the middle road)

I tend to get it from (and deliver it to) both sides as a consequence.  There’s a lot of opinion flying around and simply not enough information to speak definitively from either.  So, I tend to keep my options open.  In doing so, I keep KMac’s excellent point about false negatives and positives firmly in mind (failing to recognize a threat is far more dangerous than recognizing one that isn’t there).

I also have to wonder how much where the line should be drawn would really affect our calculations and tactics.

Posted by a Finn on March 14, 2007, 07:20 PM | #

“I also have to wonder how much where the line should be drawn would really affect our calculations and tactics.”

- My recommendation: When people criticize the jews, take part in politics, write etc., and all this is because: “I hope these measures will change the jews for the better”; this is wrong. We, our group and our future should not be dependant on what the jews do or not do. We should try to change them, and if they change, good. That is extra bonus. Our main goal should be to look inward and evaluate what we should do and then do it. All else is accessories.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on March 14, 2007, 09:07 PM | #

Finn, I meant in terms of dividing up how much of our problem is our own elite, and how much is jewry.

Posted by a Finn on March 14, 2007, 10:42 PM | #

“Finn, I meant in terms of dividing up how much of our problem is our own elite, and how much is jewry.”

- I know. The biggest problem is still we ourselves, our lack of functioning ethnic genetic group. Secondary problems: I wouldn’t divide the problem like you said. If it is divided like that, it is a question; Who leads more? Then it is the jews. I would ask; Where we can move forward the most? Straight path is not always the shortest. Indirect route might be the shortest. If we concentrate the most of our efforts to influencing the jews, we might achieve less gains than when influencing some more suitable/softer/easier group/groups or target/targets. Those gains can be used as a leverage to influencing the jews. E.g. White liberals and blacks are easier to influence than the jews. This doesn’t mean we should not influence the jews directly also, but maybe less than softer groups. Jewish groups’ inner strenght is inside their groups, but their outside power is totally dependant on other groups and their resources. When the jews e.g. extorted fraudulently the Swiss, they used U.S. pension funds as their leverage (Norman Finkelstein, Holocaust industry), where the most of the monies was not theirs, and probably it was mostly European-American money.

What do you do then?

1. Say: Dear jews, please don’t do that.

2. Influence European Americans, Asians etc., so that they become aware of this harmful use of their money and start to oppose it.

3. Try to get legal precedent against this kind of use of money.

4 Some other indirect method, like described in 2 and 3.

All jewish power should be analyzed like that, but of course more thoroughly and with small details, and then suitable methods should be developed to our use.

When the situation is now what it is, I understand that many people see the jews very negatively.  But when we reach the safety of ethnic genetic group and gain more power, it might be useful to both Whites and jews to form a mutually beneficial symbiosis, where of course the two groups remain separate. The situation then is totally different than it is now. We will be ever vigilant tough ethnic competitors with permanent group and jews cannot hurt us anymore. For your consideration.

Posted by a Finn on March 14, 2007, 11:10 PM | #

Addition; Possible symbiosis requires elaborate safety mechanisms, which I don’t have time to explain now.

Posted by a Finn on March 15, 2007, 12:55 PM | #

Second addition: And again, what I proposed, does not involve resisting the jews, Israel, jewish business etc. as such, only those parts, that are harmful to us. Am I making any sense to you Svyatoslav?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 15, 2007, 01:02 PM | #

I don’t know about Svyatoslav, Finn, but you’re making sense to me.  Your comments on this subject, including all of them in this thread, are among the best I’ve seen anywhere.  Thank you for coming here to post.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on March 15, 2007, 01:07 PM | #

A veritable encyclopedia of information and understanding is distilled into this one brief crystal-clear comment, for example.  Good work, Finn!  Brilliant stuff, comrade!

Posted by a Finn on March 16, 2007, 07:18 PM | #

Thanks Fred. I guess some people here are teetering when comtemplating what I am. My writings contains seeming contradictions, solid pro-White opinions and odd, almost
pro-jewish stance. So, I heal this seeming contradiction:

As long as we don’t have enough power, we should care only about our own best interests. But let’s imagine an idealized society, where we have enough power to make the necessary things. With what conditions and principles we could make the society good, safe and stable for both the Whites and the jews, and where all honest law abiding citizens can prosper?

- Many jews will always remain the same. It doesn’t matter how much good we do to them, amongst them will always be hatred of “goys”, “shiksas” and outside “mamzers”. Inseparable part of their basic culture is to hate outsiders automatically, work against them if possible and take advantage of them in any way possible. This is reasonable in
areas of strong ethnic competition where it is countered by opposing strong ethnic competitors, but it becomes destructive both to Europeans and jews in areas of weak
ethnic competition/competitors, like European areas. As long as we have safety measures, which are uphold permanently and improve with changing situation and times, things will remain good. But if even after 10000 thousand years of happiness and stability these measures are relaxed for whatever reason, things will start to deteriorate. We have to regard jews in a little bit analogous way to tigers in Indian jungle. With safety measures things remain good, and tourists with their money come to watch and photograph them. Without safety measures tigers start to eat humans.

The following are partly overlapping;

- Is increasing middle eastern wars a problem? Currently many U.S. jews are mongering wars, but the jews proportional percentage of troops is very small compared
to their percentage of citizens. Institute a half a mercenary and half a conscription army. First mercenaries are hired. After that consript people from those groups, whose
percentage of troops lacks behind their percentage of citizens until all groups have proportionally equal share of soldiers. It would lessen the possible excessive war mongering.

Nice finishing touch would be to conscript people like Wolfowitz, Perle, “Scooter” Libby etc. to lead the troops from the front.

- Teach our children and Whites in general as much as possible about ethnic competition, ethnic competitors, it’s history, it’s present and it’s future. These are mandatory part of all studies.

- Whites’ political representatives should always be Whites.

- Groups must remain separate.

- Occupy and observe constantly intersections of money, information and power.

- Whites should have their own media to represent them and their interests. Once Whites acquire a media it cannot be sold to non-Whites. Shares of Whites media companies can be sold to non-whites, but they entitle only to a share of profit, not to a share of decision power.

- Review jewish officials hiring of employees, so that they don’t disproportionally favor their own, or hire people with harmful political views (any subversives).

- Political financing should be allowed in proportion to a group’s size. Number of political representatives should be allowed in proportion to a group’s size

- Divide jews to governing area groups. If certain area’s jews participate disproportionately in financial frauds, subversion and other transgressions, in addition to normal punishments, institute an extra tax to that community. If the community still
continues it’s transgressions and starts to be harmful to others, give warnings. If the community still continues it’s harmful activities, give the community’s members one way holiday ticket to Israel. This means that jews must also police their own and govern their community’s troublemakers.

- Make conservative community values official policy. Attempted subversion of crucial values is a crime.

- Make endorsing, facilitating and helping of immigration a crime. If specialists and other workers are really needed, allow guest workers, if it can be guaranteed, that they will be
sent back to their home country after their time is up, not depending in any way their situation. They should have some basic rights connected to their work, but not the rights
of citizens. Number of guest workers should be kept to a minimum. Limit on their numbers should be imposed, which cannot be exceeded. Guest workers should pay more than citizens, if they use public services. Guest workers don’t have marrying rights with citizens. No amnesty to guest workers is possible. If the guest worker program turns to a problem, it is finished and all guest workers sent immediately to their home
countries. Guest workers should be taken only from countries which can be easily made to accept them back, if necessary.

- Large families are endorsed. Whites majority numbers in the area are enforced. Other groups have citizens rights as long as their average birth rates don’t exceed Whites’ average rates. If other group starts “conquering by wombs”, they are either send to another country, or an area is apportioned to them, which is separated to it’s own mini state. Armed wall reaching to high heaven is built between the areas. Then normal state to state relations are created, if it is possible.

- It is accepted, and known by all, that many jews’ first priority, loyalty and bonds are with jewish ethnic group and Israel.

- Special attention is directed to indirect ways of subversion.

- Ethnic competition is a study subject in universities and new methods are developed, without changing the crucial basic methods.

- White groups inner politics is more important than democracy. Whites decide their inner politics themselves and don’t need anyone else’s acceptance.

Etc.

One problem remains. Large part of jewish power is international and in their international relations. That cannot be regulated properly and can lead to trouble.

Laws and regulations concerning other groups are mandatory studying to them. Law abiding jews are respected citizens with full rights. Jewish group is not discriminated against (equal shares). What law abiding jews earn, they can keep. These laws prevent conflicts. These fair laws’ and regulations’ purpose is to regulate ethnic competition and
create a durable groups and state. Unregulated ethnic competition leads to destructive end results, of which even genocides are normal part. If these conditions are not acceptable, Whites and jews should be as groups and their living areas separate or as separate as possible.

These were examples how ethnic competition could be managed in state level. If people want to control it, the actual laws must at least resemble the above mentioned. As the
laws described an ideal, and it is possible that we never reach it fully, our best policy would be to strive towards them. Those parts concerning our group we can of course
accomplish fully.

These measures don’t have anything to do with the abilities of individuals. They describe a situation where the jews as a powerful group are unable to represent the best interests of Whites and this situation cannot be corrected.

Posted by a Finn on March 16, 2007, 11:15 PM | #

Some additions:

- Regulated ethnic competition -society is not the best society I can think of. At least those who write here know now what it may require to correct ethnic competition problems without using violence or establishing dictatorship. Perhaps in the end it is for the both parties the best solution to go their own way and establish their own states/areas.

- If somebody doubts that unregulated ethnic competition methods might lead to genocide in the future (although the examples are plentiful in history) take a look at the growing and radicalizing muslim community in Europe. Jews have advocated open immigration efficiently as a way of weakening the majority population’s power (One of the main reasons). If muslims, who hate the jews deeply, take over Europe as a consequence of immigration, as has been predicted by e.g. Bat Y’eor, Bernard Lewis and Mark Steyn, it’s consequences to jews might be especially grave. Europe’s nuclear missiles in muslim hands threatens also Israel. Muslims might be in the end tougher and more brutal ethnic competitors than the jews.

If America becomes majority non-white (Jews have advocated open immigration efficiently also in the U.S.), who will these people target, when they start to grab power? Could their main target be a small group, who have the most concentrated power in the U.S.? Who knows what forms the powergrab will take. Many latinos and blacks seem to hate and oppose jews.

- Whites should start to protect themselves from all the ethnic competition’s harmful effects, but at same time influence surrounding society maximally, regardless what other decisions we make.

- This is to those, who don’t understand metaphoric comparisons. These people are known to exist. Comparing jews to tigers does not mean that jews should be tourist attractions or that they eat humans.

Here is a link, which describes some of the situation in Europe from a pro-jewish perspective.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1980

Posted by a Finn on March 17, 2007, 12:40 AM | #

Small additions still:

- Knock out the word “thousand” from after the 10000, which in itself is, of course, metaphor.

- Basic culture refers to of course Old testament, Palestianian Talmud and Babylonian Talmud and their direct consequences. Majority of jews don’t hate non-jews automatically, don’t take advantage of them in any way they can or work against them in any way they can. Still enough of them do or have a milder version of it, so that they have large effects on non-jews. Majority of jews participate in some way wittingly or unwittingly to jewish activities, which has negative effects to Whites. Clarification.

Posted by a Finn on March 17, 2007, 12:49 AM | #

And the last: E.g. Babylonian Talmud allows any action towards non-jews from friendliness to hostile action, but still the hostile actions are an inseparable part of it.

Posted by a Finn on March 17, 2007, 04:32 PM | #

Conclusion: The best alternative to White-jewish co-operation might be different areas for both with half permeable membrane = border between them that is designed to let through good things to both directions. Whites get rid of useless, unwanted and energy consuming observation duties, governing others etc. tasks. I am sure the jews would be much more happier with this arrangement too. Still, Whites should use, teach, study and develop ethnic competition methods in this scenario too.

This is theory what might be in the future. Whether or not this becomes reality, we must have long term goals towards which to strive. Practical small scale work can then be directed to the right course.

If some people want to establish durable White-jewish area, I wish them all the luck in the world. They will need it.

Posted by a Finn on March 17, 2007, 04:40 PM | #

More accurately: If some people want to establish durable White-jewish area without ethnic competition regulation, I wish them all the luck in the world. They will need it.