An Honest Conversation About Race.

Linda Chavez wrote an article in the June, 2008 issue of Commentary—the Neocon magazine—entitled Let Us by All Means Have an Honest Conversation about Race. She notes that fewer than 8% of Whites hold negative attitudes about Blacks, while other minorities hold more negative attitudes about Blacks. There is nothing new in this observation—anyone familiar with Kevin MacDonald’s work knows that Whites are the least ethnocentric, but also we know how to behave and be agreeable. Whites are subject to negative implicit attitudes but not explicit attitudes where we are more likely to conform to the diversity/multiculturalism/naïve environmentalism with regards to race.

Again, she points out that non-Whites have higher levels of tension between them than is present between Whites and other races. In fact, “a plurality of blacks would rather do business with whites than with either Hispanics or Asians.” (the poll conveniently left out Jews.) And later, “As against the 10 percent or fewer of American whites who hold negative views of blacks, the same mid-1990’s survey of intergroup attitudes cited above registered over three-quarters of blacks holding negative views of whites.” And yet she notes that Blacks would rather do business with Whites than with other minorities.

She also discusses Obama, and takes him to task for blaming society for Black failure in an earlier discussion of race, then last Sunday he gave a sermon similar to Bill Cosby’s on Black male’s irresponsibility towards the family. He seems to have numerous excuses in the ready depending on the occasion or the audience. Chavez’s interpretation: “In short, according to this analysis, whites and others are suffering from a kind of false consciousness. What they fail to understand, when confronted with the pathologies disproportionately afflicting the black community, is that the fault lies elsewhere than in persistent but remediable behavior. It lies in the capitalist system and in government.” HOLD ON TO YOUR POCKETBOOK WHITEY!

She also notes that Blacks are subject to absurd beliefs such as evidence planted against O. J. Simpson, guns and drugs are supplied to the ghetto so blacks will be killed, HIV was developed by Whites to kill Blacks, etc. A lower average intelligence allows for indiscriminate paranoia.

What she failed to discuss however was the low average mental ability of Blacks and the low conscientiousness that contributes to pathology and failure. So again, Linda Chavez like so many others, does not want a truly honest discussion about race.

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Saturday, June 21, 2008 at 02:26 PM in Race realism
Comments (9) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by .357 on June 21, 2008, 04:39 PM | #

“In fact, “a plurality of blacks would rather do business with whites than with either Hispanics or Asians.”

Another fact is: Most blacks would rather do bussiness with whites than fellow blacks. Black owned bussiness are scarce even in cities that are predominantly black. Gee, I wonder why?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 22, 2008, 10:30 PM | #

A new source of “honest conversation about race,” Frenchman Gaston Phébus, is warmly welcomed today over at the Vdare.com blog:

Gaston Phebus Says Bonjour

We recently added to our blogroll Le Blog de Gaston Phébus, maintained by a French immigration reform patriot.  He sends this message to VDARE.COM readers:

“France is even more afflicted by immigration problems than the US, in part because her immigrants are mostly non-Christian (Muslim), which causes much deeper cultural and behavioral incompatibilities — especially around the issue of violence.  I publish in French, and provide in-depth analyses of such controversial topics as the IQ of immigrants, how a nominally democratic government can run a full-steam pro-immigration propaganda machine, and the origins of the welfare state which has been such a powerful immigration magnet.

“Compared to France, the US is still a relatively free country, at least in the matter of immigration speech.  There are many laws designed to choke us here, many of them emanating from the European Union, plus governmental offices likes the newly-created HALDE [literally, the High Authority of the Law Against Discrimination and For Equality], whose considerable budget is solely devoted to hunting down people like us, and then government-subsidized NGOs with a lot of access to the media, which are staffed with virulent pro-immigrationists keen on doing a public lynching every now and then.

“As a consequence, all politically incorrect blogs written by French people are hosted on American internet service providers!  In addition, the norm for people like me in France is to post under a pseudonym.  For mine, I chose Gaston Phébus, a (locally) famous medieval hero.”

We welcome Gaston Phébus and look forward to working with him!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 23, 2008, 03:48 AM | #

What happens when you refuse to acknowledge race-replacement as an issue (it is of course THE central issue):  the other side has an answer to everything you put forward and you go down to defeat.  The one thing they can’t answer:  race-replacement. 

As for Medved, he’s a typical Jewish neocon, one-hundred percent of whom want government-enforced race-replacement of Euros in this country but would cry bloody murder if anyone advocated the same for Israel.  Medved’s a worthless hypocrite, in other words, and an example of the kind of Jew who takes Euros to be no higher than animals, with aspirations no higher and rights no greater.  To this kind of Jew, Euros are a sort of chimp.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 26, 2008, 01:06 PM | #

From the Must Read! department: 

the article linked in this log entry:

http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/06/taylor-race-and-iq.html

There are many take-home points in that article, both explicit and implicit.  What a total asshole John Zmirak is, for one:  a completely contemptible digusting hopeless little non-entity.  For another, and this is extremely important, it’s not the Negroes who are going around suppressing race realism:  one sees here how most of them react rationally to its claims (which they likely already strongly suspected anyway, without anyone needing to tell them).  So, who is suppressing it and why?  Think about that. 

Or do I have to do a “fill in the blank”? 

OK, OK, there may be more than one blank you have to fill in, I admit ... Catholics, for example, would be one of the “other” blanks ... (like Zmirak, a blank in more ways than one two three a lot). 

But though all blanks are blank, some are blanker than others ... if my meaning is clear ...

Posted by GT on June 26, 2008, 11:58 PM | #

To this kind of Jew, Euros are a sort of chimp.

Absolutely, but with reason.

H. MacDonald is a chimp because the preservation of easy money and status is more important to her than racial truth.  That or she lacks competence in debating racial realities.  Maybe some of both.  Fulford, on the other hand, is a chimp for liking Michael Medved before he “morphed into one of the most vicious and arrogant neocon pundits.” Only gentile sluts for easy money (who are attempting to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism) or useful idiots would state or suggest that Michael Medved was ever likable.

jews will continue to see Euros as chimps until we break the cycle of “that’s a good monkey, have a banana.” Breaking the cycle means having the brains, talent, nads, and energy to create the alternate systems that allow us to reward ourselves.  Our idle ones, the gentile “elite” H. Monetarus and its wannabes, we leave behind with the multicult.

Posted by .357 on June 27, 2008, 01:32 AM | #

You tell’em, GT. grin

Posted by Weston on June 27, 2008, 03:31 AM | #

Fulford, on the other hand, is a chimp for liking Michael Medved before he “morphed into one of the most vicious and arrogant neocon pundits.” Only gentile sluts for easy money (who are attempting to deflect accusations of anti-Semitism) or useful idiots would state or suggest that Michael Medved was ever likable.

The line about liking Medved in the link that Fred provided was the letter writer’s, not Fulford’s.  Fulford has always struck me as among the best (i.e. most pro-white) that VDARE has to offer. 

What happens when you refuse to acknowledge race-replacement as an issue (it is of course THE central issue):  the other side has an answer to everything you put forward and you go down to defeat.  The one thing they can’t answer:  race-replacement. 

Preach it, Fred.  These “non-racist” opponents of illegal immigration are deliberately eschewing the most powerful and effective argument they have at their disposal.  And for what? As Peter Brimelow noted, they end up being called “racist” anyway. 

Posted by GT on June 27, 2008, 03:49 AM | #

The line about liking Medved in the link that Fred provided was the letter writer’s, not Fulford’s.  Fulford has always struck me as among the best (i.e. most pro-white) that VDARE has to offer.

I wrong and careless about Fulford being a chimp.  My apologies to him.

Nevertheless the point stands.

Posted by ilianna on August 05, 2008, 04:30 AM | #

That’s very interesting. I’ve always noticed that the Asians in my family tend to be more prejudiced than say the white members. Truth is, I suspect it’s because many of them did not grow up in the US, and are quite xenophobic (since China and Taiwan is obviously predominately Asian).

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)

captcha shown here

Next entry: Taking RD to our people

Previous entry: DO ANTI-RACISTS SUFFER FROM STOCKHOLM SYNDROME?

image of the day

Existential Issues

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

linksoflondon commented in entry 'John Wadham: father of modern British nationalism!' on 03/18/10, 05:58 AM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Romilly Jenkins: Truth and 'Ethnic' Truth' on 03/18/10, 04:10 AM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/18/10, 02:39 AM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/18/10, 02:17 AM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Serious Crime - The Ethnic Dimension; Fact and Fantasy' on 03/18/10, 01:45 AM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/18/10, 01:24 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/18/10, 12:35 AM. (go) (view)

Borvo commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/17/10, 11:44 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Diasporal Hijinks: Christopher Hitchens and the Janjaweed' on 03/17/10, 10:31 PM. (go) (view)

Maximilio commented in entry 'Is Dr. David Duke, Ph.D., a Kosher Nazi?' on 03/17/10, 10:12 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 08:01 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 07:44 PM. (go) (view)

Robert Reis commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/17/10, 07:29 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Blowing Bubbles' on 03/17/10, 07:27 PM. (go) (view)

Dan Dare commented in entry 'Blowing Bubbles' on 03/17/10, 06:33 PM. (go) (view)

Dan Dare commented in entry 'Blowing Bubbles' on 03/17/10, 05:44 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry 'Blowing Bubbles' on 03/17/10, 05:22 PM. (go) (view)

g commented in entry 'Blowing Bubbles' on 03/17/10, 05:06 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 03:16 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 02:30 PM. (go) (view)

DRS commented in entry 'Blowing Bubbles' on 03/17/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Serious Crime - The Ethnic Dimension; Fact and Fantasy' on 03/17/10, 02:00 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 01:45 PM. (go) (view)

MsAnnThrope commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 03/17/10, 12:17 PM. (go) (view)

Lurker commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 03/17/10, 11:42 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 11:35 AM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry 'Serious Crime - The Ethnic Dimension; Fact and Fantasy' on 03/17/10, 10:37 AM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 10:18 AM. (go) (view)

MsAnnThrope commented in entry 'A genocide in South Africa' on 03/17/10, 09:53 AM. (go) (view)

Eddie Booth commented in entry 'Serious Crime - The Ethnic Dimension; Fact and Fantasy' on 03/17/10, 09:12 AM. (go) (view)

Søren Renner commented in entry 'Saturday Riddle Classic' on 03/17/10, 03:12 AM. (go) (view)

mossydottir commented in entry 'Saturday Riddle Classic' on 03/17/10, 03:08 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/17/10, 01:12 AM. (go) (view)

Gupta commented in entry 'The Indian/Chinese IQ puzzle' on 03/17/10, 12:25 AM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry 'Saturday Riddle Classic' on 03/16/10, 11:57 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa