anti chick

Posted by Daedalus on May 29, 2007, 07:12 PM | #

I watched Idiocracy last night.

Posted by James Bowery on May 29, 2007, 07:14 PM | #

It’s not just dysgenics though.

This girl is functionally brain damaged by academia and media.

Posted by Guessedworker on May 29, 2007, 07:31 PM | #

I want to see the day when her college professors have to explain to authority with bowed heads why they taught this child that the possession of a white skin is violence.

She can be forgiven her painful callowness and suggestibility.  But they are responsible men and women of an average 130 IQ who chose the profession of poisoning young minds.  Banishment to the Third World would be a just retribution.

Posted by Guessedworker on May 29, 2007, 07:34 PM | #

But not in the case of Noel Ignatieff, of course.

Posted by Daedalus on May 29, 2007, 07:56 PM | #

Linder is a member of the privileged white male elite!

Posted by Daedalus on May 29, 2007, 08:04 PM | #

I would have slammed her on third world pollution. China and India are amongst the world’s biggest polluters. Third world countries like Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Venezuala, Angola, and Mexico are more than happy to sell their oil to the West (it’s their major source of income). In fact, the Venezualan, Saudi, Mexican, and Iranian oil industries have all been nationalized. They are not controlled by rich white males. This stupid broad is oblivious to the fact that it is rich white males like Al Gore who are the biggest alarmists about climate change. Rich white Europeans care more about global warming than anyone else. Just look at the ridiculous prices Europeans pay for petrol.

Posted by James Bowery on May 29, 2007, 08:11 PM | #

I would have slammed her on third world pollution.

Merely the result of white heterosexual male privilege sapping the life out of those economies… or something… It hardly matters.  You have to understand that these people are rationalizing their slavery because to do otherwise would be to face the horrific fact that the planet is being destroyed to populate the world with the most racist of races while exterminating the least racist of races.

Posted by Viridovix on May 29, 2007, 08:50 PM | #

She is incorrect in that she contradictorily attributes ecocide to White males, then states that any people can be corrupted by this global system of destruction. She seems unaware that India and China are not ruled by any White males, yet these emerging industrial countries, containing a third of the world population, are responsible for serious environmental problems. How does this child imagine that a revolt against White males is going to fix global environmental problems?

Her problem is that she parrots an official position that markets itself as rebellious, thus appealing to our energetic youths. All this a production courtesy of the very oligarchy she feels oppressed by.

The wealthy, privileged elite, the very people she claims to stand against, create antis like her. Take note that the opposition organizer was a White male lawyer. Is this not usually the case?

The answer is not oppression or violence in any form against innocent adult children (which is the anti’s formula for White males), but as Mr. Renner did, confront them with their own contradictions.

I disagree with almost all White male “conservatives” on the environment. Conservatives have a record of not conserving anything whatsoever, be it blood OR soil because they are primarily individualists and capitalists; those characters who are ultimately responsible for creating minority crime in our nations via importing bought slaves, egalitarianism so no paying customer feels offended, and lately illegal migrant workers in the US.

A healthy natural world that sustains us is more important than your commerce which depends upon it.

Posted by Maguire on May 29, 2007, 09:20 PM | #

“thus appealing to our energetic youths. All this a production courtesy of the very oligarchy she feels oppressed by.”

That precisely describes both groups present.

Posted by Viridovix on May 29, 2007, 09:40 PM | #

The anti’s side is misdirected slave revolt, sometimes managed and produced by the masters they hate. The racist side is usually mismanaged, directionless slave revolt. This is all a permitted energy sink for discontent, a secure guarantee that nothing changes the present order.

Posted by onetwothree on May 29, 2007, 10:06 PM | #

Secular religion. Ever try to talk someone out of Jesus? Same thing, only harder.

Posted by TG on May 29, 2007, 11:05 PM | #

“Secular religion. Ever try to talk someone out of Jesus? Same thing, only harder."--onetwothree

What sort of secular religion do you belong too, onetwothree ?

Posted by Maguire on May 29, 2007, 11:06 PM | #

“The racist side is usually mismanaged, directionless slave revolt.”

The racist side is also managed by the same people controlling the Antifas, but indirectly.  The mechanisms used to control the WNs are:

1.  The ADL/SPLC/Media nexus promoting dysfunctional but not dangerous leaders.  These people provide the direct mismanagement.

2.  The paid police agent-informers constantly setting up entrapment stings and urging illegal courses of action within each group.  The subsequent bust and trial then feeds back into the ADL/SPLC/Media publicity nexus. 

The trial after EVERY major WN bust for the last 20 years inevitably revealed one or more informers who were prsent and helped seed the illegal enterprise from the start. 

This includes the Aryan Republican Army, Timonthy McVeigh and the OKC bombing.  In that case at least three are now known to have been in place controlled by BATF, FBI and SPLC.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on May 30, 2007, 03:30 AM | #

She’s the type of a White female who dates negro men just to prove to everyone how open-minded and anti-racist she is.

Since being racist is the greatest crime in our western societies, such neurotic and self-loathing creatures like herself and her colleagues are a product of our sick times.

I don’t know how we can de-programme these unhappy, wretched souls.

Posted by Top on May 30, 2007, 04:01 AM | #

“The anti’s side is misdirected slave revolt”

It really is an amazing feat!  The energy of a people directed to damage their own biological interests- in order to advance the biological interests of others.  Young white people are directed into a struggle against themselves.  The whole leftist youth movement is a sham - but they cannot see it.  They are parroting arguments with which they will commit suicide, but they cannot see it.

Notice her voice - it sounds like she is under hypnosis.  She has the the voice of a 60’s hippie. Her trance-like state can only be compared to a member of a suicidal cult and/or war time heavy-duty brainwashing experiment victim.  What other description fits?  Maybe insanity?

The sad part is that radical groups with jewish and foreign over-representation would never get away with this sort of brain-washing in the middle east, South Asia, or Africa.  They may all have lower IQ and less advanced societies, but this sort of garbage would never fly.  Our weakness.

The more I think about it, the more I realize how Islam and and the extended-family structure of the middle east neutralizes this sort of crap.  But it’s more than that.  When I talk to to Arabs, Indians, and Africans I realize they are much more situationally aware than the average white.  They are naturally much better at racial manipulation detection than whites.  I think as we break back down into extended family structure some of these skills may come back.

But than again, as James says, the current white racial manipulation weakness is probably something biological and the only way out for whites is to solve this problem as a whole - on the national level.  What’s the point in regressing to more primitive social structures?

If not us, maybe the Chinese will get it right.

Posted by James Bowery on May 30, 2007, 04:22 AM | #

as James says, the current white racial manipulation weakness is probably something biological and the only way out for whites is to solve this problem as a whole - on the national level.

To clarify my position:  I do _not_ believe that biologically ingrained racism is desirable nor do I believe we should tolerate it.  On the contrary, I believe that biologically ingrained individuality is the proper use of human mass for further evolution. If that means a Malthusian struggle against other, more racist, races, then by all means let’s get on with it, if only to preserve our biologically ingrained individualism!

You think _that’s_ confusing—you haven’t adequately picked apart the mental knots into which we’ve been tied by the more racist races.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 30, 2007, 03:52 PM | #

Secular religion. Ever try to talk someone out of Jesus? Same thing, only harder.

Yes.

What sort of secular religion do you belong too, onetwothree?

He probably worships the same Gods I do, Science and Nature.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on May 30, 2007, 03:56 PM | #

What other description fits?  Maybe insanity?

No maybe about it - the western Zeitgeist is insanity (where “is” is an equals sign, not a metaphorical “is"), and she’s just one of the heavier imbibers of Kool-Aid.

Posted by Alex Zeka on May 30, 2007, 06:39 PM | #

I assume that by “racism” you mean ethnic nepotism, not noticing that races vary in some ways, james. Otherwise you seem to be saying that blindness to a fact of nature needs to be genetically ingrained for the sake of individuality. That’s just perverse - individuality means making decisions for yourself, and that can only be done effectively by being well informed and clear eyed.

It would be nice if you could write and post a Bowery glossary sometime, to act as a reference for first time readers and to clear up any confusions like this one.

Posted by TG on May 30, 2007, 08:21 PM | #

“He probably worships the same Gods I do, Science and Nature."--Svyatoslav Igorevich

Nature is the manifestation of God’s creation. Science is the study of God’s creation.

Posted by James Bowery on May 30, 2007, 11:37 PM | #

Alex, I may have gone over-the-top a bit in expressing my point but it here it is in more moderate terms:

The more selective pressure we allow at the group level, the more we guide evolution to a super-organisms consisting of coordinated masses of clones attempting to optimally coordinate within each group.  Imagine, if you will, a bunch of clones forming what appears to be a circus act where they use each other (and perhaps balancing bars) to build a huge “man” with “legs” and attempt to “walk” by coordinating with each other. 

It’s manifestly dysgenic. 

When we observe an ethnic gang operating, we are pretty far from such an absurd creature, but we’re heading in that direction.  Worse is when such gangs adopt the appearance of “individuals” operating “independently”, while maintaining their nascent organismic relationship.  Eusocial insects are little better.

Posted by James Bowery on May 31, 2007, 02:13 AM | #

I suppose I need to re-emphasize my point about biological predisposition:

Clearly, in a world filled with racist races bent on taking over every last bit of carrying capacity from each other, it is ridiculous to claim that individualistic races should not form groups in self-defense.  Indeed, the groups they form in self-defense should operate even more cohesively than the biologically racist groups—and should operate even more ruthlessly.

The taboo against consciously and honestly forming such groups is, it is pretty obvious to me, an extended phenotype of the biologically racist races since the individualistic racist are absolutely dependent on conscious coordination of their gang behavior according to explicitly stated rules.  Hypocrisy is a biological weapon secreted by the racist races the way insects secret pheromones.  A tell-tale sign of such extended phenotypes the “smells” smeared on words like “racist”.  Such “smells” are otherwise known as “connotations”.

Posted by Viridovix on May 31, 2007, 03:38 AM | #

Having previously lived by a large riverway for a brief while, I have experience with olfactory extremes. During the low tide cycle, the water receded exposing algae-laden rock to the daytime sun. For a newcomer to the area, the smell was initially powerful.

As the passing days turned to months, the cycles of exposure naturally continued and I grew desensitized to that particular frequent scent. I was so desensitized to the smell, that even during low tide daytime algae exposure, the sensation began to pass unnoticed by me.