anti chick 2

Posted by Tommy G on May 30, 2007, 06:51 PM | #

We have seen the faces of the true enimie and it is liberal/feminist White women. ...But on second thought, it’s also the the evil perverts that brainwash them.

Posted by Top on May 30, 2007, 10:50 PM | #

Notice the aggression of people like this.  They like to throw words like ‘hate-monger’ around and yet they have no problem advocating extreme actions against their enemies.

The worst aspect of this is their absolute conviction of their moral superiority.  These people do not engage in debate - they merely use the power of their position to inflict damage.  Put people like this in power and real evil arises behind them.  Evil is always one step behind self-righteousness and the willingness to use power to achieve arbitrary moral goals.  Since their goals are grounded in modern Marxist anti-west revolutionary thinking and not in any traditional thinking their moral goals are arbitrary.

Posted by anon on May 30, 2007, 10:53 PM | #

I wanted to hear Soren ask his question.  The woman wouldn’t let him speak.  Must be some feminist convention about dominating the conversation.

Posted by Guessedworker on May 30, 2007, 11:11 PM | #

Yes, perceptive, Top.  I was struck by the lack of any love whatsoever for those she sees as “the other”.  They are entirely dehumanised for her ... “racist” is a category of non-human.  And she clearly entertains no shadow of a doubt about that.  There is no suggestion that she might be wrong about the very extreme action she is taking.

Chick 1 was just suggestible and a little bit sad.  One has the feeling that one day she could look back on what she said and did that day and experience an intense embarrassment.  Chick 2, however, is shriven with hate for the those she calls haters.  She is reduced in her humanity by it, and projects all that onto her enemies across the police cordon.  This is a mental condition from which she will likely never recover.

Posted by sofita on May 30, 2007, 11:32 PM | #

I’m not sure I understand this.  Who is she calling a “hatemonger” and a “racist”.  Does recognizing and protesting black on white crime make one a hatemonger and a racist?  What if you have black friends, but still feel strongly that something needs to be done about black on white violence?  Are you a racist then?  I don’t think so.  Suppose tomorrow whites started attacking blacks the way blacks now attacks whites and blacks came out and started protesting.  Would they be racists and hatemongers?  I don’t think so.  I think they would just be legitimately trying to raise awareness of a problem so that it can be solved.  Am I missing something here?

Posted by Søren Renner on May 30, 2007, 11:35 PM | #

You misunderstand the purpose of these clips. That my voice is audible at all is an imperfection; she did allow me to ask the question, but I cut it. It’s not about me. But while the topic is open, do you really think she could dominate me, conversationally or otherwise?

Posted by - on May 31, 2007, 12:31 AM | #

If anyone is interested in starting a website that posts pictures and video of aggressive, violent, radical Marxists (including that of this lovely young woman) who might live in a neighborhood near you, please do so.  This woman’s name is Hillary Hosta and she works for Coal River Mountain Watch in Sylvester/Whitesville W. Va.  She has worked for both Greenpeace and the Ruckus Society in the past.

Posted by wjg on May 31, 2007, 02:06 AM | #

If we think our own women are our enemies then we are the one’s lost.  The issue isn’t what she says; women are ultra-suggestible and politically useless (just as men are useless in the domain of women).  The issue is that white men have allowed a foreign enemy to plant into our women (and most our men) memes they are incapable of thinking to their conclusion: geoncide.  Our women can no more be our enemy than a malfunctioning liver can be against its own body.

When our women stray we have only ourselves to blame.

Posted by wjg on May 31, 2007, 02:10 AM | #

Oops, Since I am unaware of what a “geon” is it probably can’t be killed.  “Genocide” is better.

Posted by Jack on May 31, 2007, 02:40 AM | #

“The issue isn’t what she says; women are ultra-suggestible and politically useless”

The NSDAP made extensive use of women for political purposes. You don’t have a clue.

Posted by wjg on May 31, 2007, 02:56 AM | #

Jack,

I meant useless as far as political discernment.  When we were still men we knew that and that’s why women didn’t vote.  You meant useful as far as them being used.  Those are not mutually exclusive conclusions.  What do you do about the current situation; cry about all the evil feminists?  That’s the domain of whipped manhood.  No, we take on the cause of their delusions.

Posted by Matra on May 31, 2007, 03:38 AM | #

This woman’s name is Hillary Hosta and she works for Coal River Mountain Watch in Sylvester/Whitesville W. Va.  She has worked for both Greenpeace and the Ruckus Society in the past.

Looks like she’s another environmentalist looney bin and judging by her accent not from the state in which she carries out her activities. Here are two pictures of her being arrested.

She said she wanted to protect society from the offensive “violent racists” protesting the apparently not so offensive murders of Channon and Christopher. Was there any violence perpetrated by the protesters?

Posted by Guessedworker on May 31, 2007, 11:04 AM | #

She’s no lily, so Mrs Hosta probably married a Mexican.  Judging from what looks like some fairly physical environmental activism, her wrong-headedness preceded that union.  But anyway, as we’ve seen before with whites who marry outside the race, her ethnic interests are well and truly transferred to another people.

Individuals like this are beyond the redemptive reach of counter-argument.  Life in the Hosta homeland is the best solution.

Posted by Guessedworker on May 31, 2007, 11:24 AM | #

From Matra’s link:-

The Board approval of the second coal silo was the last straw for citizens who have followed EVERY available means to be heard by their government. Meetings with the governor proved futile.  Over and over again, folks say that we’ve listened too long to false promises and outright lies.

In sheer desperation, about a hundred people occupied Governor Manchin’s reception area and inner office hallway.

At the Capitol, OVEC board member Winnie Fox said, “They’ve ruined lives and we’re not going to take it anymore.”

Non-violent civil disobedience is never a step that is taken lightly. But we’ve tried so many possible avenues of redress without success. People’s very lives are at stake. This is our latest effort to be heard. Anyone present at the protest couldn’t help but come away with a sense of awed horror at the extent to which Coal’s minions in the State Capitol are willing to go to protect Coal’s profits.

So there IS an overlap between Hillary Hosta’s moral universe and ours.

Posted by wjg on May 31, 2007, 01:34 PM | #

“Individuals like this are beyond the redemptive reach of counter-argument.  Life in the Hosta homeland is the best solution.”

GW,

I believe that is the best approach for our gone and going women.  Let them face the fruits of their worldview without us to shield them from it.  But once they (hopefully) learn their lessons we are waiting to bring most of them back where they belong.

We cannot treat feminism/ists the same way we treat the other symptoms of our rot, or its causes, since women and men cannot be made enemies in a healthy body.

Ignoring or laughing at them is the better approach.  Confrontation might delude them into thinking we actually are concerned with their thoughts.  The real work is too pressing to be distracted with silliness.

As Fred says, there are exceptions, but that doesn’t abrogate the rule.  And for women that are overt White racialists, they should be praised, though the fight is not theirs.

Posted by Maguire on May 31, 2007, 05:47 PM | #

“This woman’s name is Hillary Hosta and she works for Coal River Mountain Watch...”

http://www.crmw.net/support.php

“Coal River Mountain Watch is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization. Contributions to CRMW are both appreciated and tax deductible...”

This illustrates several key points. 

1.  The ostensible Opposition is funded full time through the medium of foundation grants and ‘charitable’ contributions. 

The second is this Opposition and the Regime overall has shallow roots in the local white communities.  It depends on assembling cadres of full time employees across broad geographic distances, the same as the rag-tag unpaid WN ‘militia’ must assemble from dispersed areas. 

The same was true of the Y2K recount circus in Florida. 
Both ‘Republicans’ and ‘Democrats’ were forced to fly in Washington staffers to provid protestor extras for the TV cameras.  That in a state of 17 million population.

2.  The most common ‘Local’ response is similar to the average Iraqi.  The locals come to view it all as an exteral invasion of two combatant parties who are using their community as a battleground for alien purposes.  For instance, the typical Iraqi will say he hates al Qaida but hates American troops more.

The Anti Chicks accomplish even less ‘recruiting’ at these events also, but then they don’t have to.  They ‘hire’.

3.  Back on their home turfs the Anti Chicks and the groups they build are at least as dysfunctional as distributed and semi-virtual WN organizations.  They have no economic resource to offer recruited witlings because they keep it all for themselves for salary and expenses.  And they are invariably urging their witling rainbow coalition followers on courses that are economically self-destructive and impovershing.

I believe the correct riposte is to build truly localized cadres.  These will be far more successful than alien outsiders at mobilizing other locals as necessary.  The question is how to adhere these cadres on a day to day basis since we won’t get tens of millions in foundation grant funding.

One conclusion GT & I reached a couple years ago is these cadres have to be mainly self-financing and primarily engaged in productive activities on a day to day basis. 

Maguire

Posted by Friedrich Braun on June 01, 2007, 02:32 AM | #

I’ve run into such women myself. I find them frightening. They’re rigid, moralistic, self-righteous, cold, and fanatical. They remind me of the women in George Orwell’s 1984. She’d make a ruthless Bolshevik Commissar. She’s more zealous than any Ayatollah.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on June 01, 2007, 02:59 AM | #

Hillary Hosta says that if people do not share her opinions, they are more than welcome to sit down with her and have a glass of tea and civil discussion.

http://www.sludgesafety.org/news/2005/06_09.html

Do you think that she would agree to sit down with Alex Linder, for example?

I’ve worked for an international environmental organization myself and I hate to see such Leftist freaks kidnap a traditionally völkisch cause: environmentalism.

Posted by Scimitar on June 01, 2007, 05:19 AM | #

As it happens, Madison Grant was one of the pioneers of American environmentalism. The eugenicist Henry Fairfield Osborn was the co-founder of the Save-the-Redwoods League. TR, of course, was a racist in addition to being a conservationist. I don’t see how anyone can simultaneously claim to be an anti-racist and conservationist. How can you be for saving the rainforest and against racial preservation?

Posted by Guessedworker on June 01, 2007, 12:13 PM | #

Friedrich: rigid, moralistic, self-righteous, cold, and fanatical.

That is an apt description of a human type found in all radical movements, and always present among the perpetrators of the worst excesses that such movements all too often produce.

The striking thing about these people is that they compartmentalise very successfully.  It’s not just that they are hypocrites or humbugs.  It’s more than that.  They labour under far more violent internal stress than the regulation liberal hypocrite.  They seem to cope by having thick internal buffers which prevent the violent hatreds of their particular “Life of Conviction”, whatever it is, from crashing into or causing too much discomfort in their “Life of Warmth”, with all its perhaps normal loves and passions.  They are not unipolar monsters.

No doubt they self-image according to the softer focii of Warmth, and in Conviction mode share, in relation to the harm done to others, some of the empathic difficulties which define clinical psychopathy.

They are, of course, extremely dangerous and not to be trusted, and you are right, Friedrich, to find them frightening.

Posted by Jean Depression on June 02, 2007, 08:24 PM | #

Does anyone remember the distinction made previously on this blog between freeriding and “crossriding”, the latter a term invented by a certified “creative genius?(*)”

What you are observing here is classic crossriding.

This is a topic deserving of further study.

*sarcasm