blue on blue: CVH reads from Sloot

Posted by Søren Renner on Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 09:03 PM in
Comments (19) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by UK POP on May 31, 2007, 11:46 PM | #

Is this a riff on Stevens’ “The Man with the Blue Guitar?”
http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/88v/blueguitar.html

A cross-hatched pen & ink version perhaps?
Who is CVH?

Posted by Søren Renner on May 31, 2007, 11:59 PM | #

I thought everyone here would be familiar with his voice, since he has graced MR Radio more than once. It isn’t Stevens or a riff on Stevens, but “green is the night” if you know what I mean.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 01, 2007, 12:48 AM | #

“Who is CVH?” (—UK POP)

Constantin von Hoffmeister (scroll down the list of Majority Radio programs to listen to the interview).

Posted by Friedrich Braun on June 01, 2007, 02:36 AM | #

Why does Soren Renner find Hoffmeister’s twaddle of interest? Does anyone else on M.R.?

Posted by Scimitar on June 01, 2007, 02:39 AM | #

Isn’t he a Bolshevik?

Posted by Friedrich Braun on June 01, 2007, 03:20 AM | #

Hoffmeister is little more than a class clown. This is how he was characterized on another list.

http://community. livejournal. com/nationalistj ews/5403. html

On Tolerance
Dear khavers,

I have received several requests to ban Mr. Hoffmeister and/or
remove his latest entries which praise Eichmann, Bolshevism and
Imperialism. I understand and share your feelings, but it wouldn’t
be wise to do so. Banning and deleting poetry, however outrageous,
is a sign of weakness. By allowing these posts to remain, we will
keep a copy of Mr. Hoffmeister’s bizarre views for everyone to name
and shame; we will also demonstrate how sure of our strength we
really are.

Mr. Hoffmeister’s views are alien to philosemites, Neonazis and
National-Bolsheviks alike; as already explained, they are a slight
modification of Duginism, a marginal pseudo-intellectual current
which has lost all its appeal by the end of the 1990s. Mr.
Hoffmeister may have added some racial elements to it, contradicting
the very basis of Imperialism/ Eurasianism (which he does not see as
a problem, advocating contradiction) , but essentially it remains the
same lofty bullshit about “the great Eurasian Empire” and
the “Brotherhood of Russia and the Greater Israel”. It has nothing
to with reality NOR with the ideal JN aspires to.

All of this shows that Mr. Hoffmeister is neither a rational thinker
nor an ideologist, but an aesthete who simply likes the sound and
look of political concepts. At one point I though he represented a
certain current within the political spectrum, but after talking to
him I must admit that a_eisod was right: he represents no one but
his own contradictory aesthetics which just happen to include the
Jews. To argue with him is futile, but it is equally stupid to
censor him, emulating the short-sighted approach of the mainstream
Jewish lobbies. Let him do whatever he wants to: he’ll soon tire of
it and find another nationalist group to give advice to. Mr.
Hoffmeister needs groups like ours, but we don’t need him.

Now for a final word of caution. Our discourse is totally marginal
by the standards of contemporary Jewry, that three-headed beast of
Zionism, anti-Zionism and mainstream Judaism. It is therefore only
natural that JN ideas will attract non-Jewish extremists, freaks and
cranks of all stripes. Do not make the mistake and think that these
are our allies just because they are “against the system” - that’s
Leftist bullshit. There is no common “system” at all. The GOG is not
the same as “World Capitalism”, the “Fascist State” or the “ZOG” -
to us, these are phantoms while the GOG is real. We have our own
interests to protect. So while non-Jews are welcome to be our guests
(especially if they can behave themselves, which unfortunately
doesn’t always seem to be the case), our allies must be Jewish.

He’s now in Russia hobnobbing with National Bolsheviks, see last picture.

http://www.nb-info.ru/nbkongress140507.htm

Posted by Friedrich Braun on June 01, 2007, 03:22 AM | #

He’s also on record saying that he doesn’t mind miscegenation and has fantasized about negro women and jewesses.

Posted by Scimitar on June 01, 2007, 05:08 AM | #

I think he posts at The Phora. He’s really perfect for them.

Posted by Melba Peachtoast on June 01, 2007, 01:17 PM | #

Freidrich, why don’t you threaten (here) to have people you dislike shot in the backs of their heads? Or is that only for German-language fora?

Come out back and I’ll let you spend ten minutes in the kraal with a new wallaby variant I just developed.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 01, 2007, 01:40 PM | #

Is the Russian-Jewish Myron( ¹ ) who wrote this (the comment from the other site which FB posted) the one who wrote this?

Incidentally, a picture of what the Jews (and therefore ZOG) badly want the U.K.’s( ² ) population to look like is posted in Myron’s personal blog.

I know what ZOG is, but what’s “GOG” (in Myron’s comment)?  I haven’t see that before.  Would it be “goy-occupied government”? 

By the way, though I just used it above, I don’t like the expression ZOG because I disagree in general with using “Zionist” in a pejorative sense as a synonym for “[diaspora] Jews” in a pejorative sense.  The problem for Euros isn’t Zionism (or Israeli Jews).  It’s disapora Jews living among us whether Zionist or not, whether religious or not.  And it’s not their Zionism, the Jews who espouse that, that makes them toxic, it’s other things.  In general, if “Jews” is what is meant, that is what ought to be said, not “Zionists” which if intended as a euphemism is uncalled for and if actually meant literally as the source of our problems is wrong.  As for Zionism itself, there’s nothing wrong with it and, as I see things, everything right with it.  If diaspora Jews are intolerable troublemakers and dangerous Euro-hating fantatics motivated by a perpetually-felt desire to render Euro societies degenerate and by neverending fantasies of seeing Euros race-mixed, race-replaced, and so genocided why not call them what they are, [diaspora] Jews, rather than sullying something innocent and normal, namely Zionism, by equating it with them in their worst aspects?

A better acronym than ZOG would be JOG (which I’ve never seen but which I imagine exists):  Jewish-occupied government. 

Are all Jews the problem?  Obviously no.  Are the ones who are the problem the whole problem?  Obviously not, they have plenty of help (from the U.S. Catholic Bishops and from Euro homosexuals, to take just two examples).  Then why single them out?  Because they’re a big enough piece of the whole problem to richly deserve being singled out and because in order for normalness to have a chance of prevailing all the biggest pieces of the problem have to be named and counterattacked by name.  (Zionism, once again, is not as I see it a piece of the problem.  If people mean Jews they should say Jews.)
______

1.  Yes I know he spells it with an i.  I believe the proper transliteration of this particular name from Russian into English calls for a y, however.

2.  The Jews and JOG want not just the U.K.’s population to look exactly like this but France’s, Germany’s, Italy’s, Spain’s, Norway’s, Switzerland’s, Greece’s, the U.S.’s, Canada’s, Australia’s, New Zealand’s, in fact every Euro-peopled country’s.  Jews envy, dislike, and fear Euros and instead of dealing with their feelings maturely and rationally in ways that are best for all concerned (including Jews), they seek to destroy that which engenders them.  In the matter of race-replacement I think the Jews are the ring-leaders.  Their most prominent Euro allies are the homosexuals of course, clueless women of course, and a subset of organized Christianity who are not leading in this matter but are being led.

Posted by Al Ross on June 01, 2007, 09:24 PM | #

Great post, Fred.

I think it was Alex Linder who said (probably after watching a Niggernoise MTV show, in the line of duty) :

“Jews are folks who want their daughters to marry Jews and your daughters to marry Niggers”.

Posted by D.S. on June 04, 2007, 07:16 PM | #

Friedrich Braun —I think most enjoy CvH, his writings, and his travels, while most find your posts boring and straight from the pages of the Sour Grapes Manual—if you’re taking votes.

Hugs.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on June 10, 2007, 02:04 AM | #

How cute, the exiled Bolshevik’s mommy showed up in this thread!

Unfortunately, one vote does NOT equal “most”, lady.

Note the overwhelming support the weird “German” Bolshevik got in this thread.

Constantin is a bizarre piece of shit who not long ago was applauding the mass rape of German women by his fellow Bolsheviks. Yes, a bullet in the back of the head is too good for such wacko filth on legs.

Posted by Israel yes, England no on July 23, 2007, 11:03 PM | #

FROM JERUSALEM TO BERLIN TO MOSCOW

by Constantin von Hoffmeister

We need to break the wall of silence. Martyrs crucified are perplexed:
one day dead in war for peace, the next worshipped but insulted. The
teachings of our race’s martyrs are neglected, ignored, distorted.
Lies culminating in transparent blissful ignorance. Through them, the
blood of the Vikings, Crusaders and Pioneers is still visible: blood
on a canvas that stretched to infinity.

The camera zooms back. What we see is a tapestry of terror, complete
with copulating comedians and frightened fighters (fear not of
physical harm but ennui alone, helpless in the face of the sheer
numbers drugged, addicted, gagged by comfort). Numbers beyond hope of
salvation. What can a fighter fight for?

Another scenario: From Jerusalem to Berlin to Moscow (the Holy
Triangle of Occidental tradition and European power): Will our race
live or die? Will we live or die? Will we build a bridge across the
Bering Strait? From Golgotha to Stalingrad: not died for sins but for
hubris - to impose a faith that is not ours, to fight a fight that was
not ALL ours. The skulls on the hill, the bones in the streets, a
reflection of a pale past that, while not without glory, admonishes us
now to beware of the enemy on the Right and to heed the friend on the
Left.

It is quite clear that Christians worship an alien god. Since
Christianity is the majority religion in Europe, it is then no
surprise that Europeans are essentially alienated from their own
spiritual heritage. However, Christianity has been the ruling religion
in Europe for almost 2,000 years. Although Christianity has been
Europeanized, it is hard to deny and not acknowledge its Jewish roots.
Collectively, Jews are the father of European monotheistic
spirituality. It is this fateful Jewish-European symbiosis that is the
root of the ever-present underlying tension between European Jews and
European gentiles. Christianity is an alien religion to European
gentiles but not to European Jews since Yahweh is the ancestral god of
the European Jews but not the European gentiles. Thus, European
gentiles, while nominally accepting the spiritual dominance of
Christianity in Europe, struggle with their ancestral gods, sometimes
trying to incorporate them into a Christian framework and sometimes
(rarely!) embracing them while at the same time rejecting
Christianity. Nevertheless, Europe has prospered not because OR
despite of Christianity but WITH it. Christian Europe has been the
REAL Europe.

This is why, for both spiritual and cultural reasons, it is important
that modern Israel be accepted as part of the future Eurosiberian
empire. A geopolitical axis that runs from Jerusalem to Berlin to
Moscow would uphold a spiritual legacy as well as form a security
alliance of peoples that are connected through the common bond of a
shared culture, namely the Western one. This alliance would provide a
bulwark against the enemies of the West, namely the endless hordes of
Muslims and savages from the South. While Moscow would be responsible
for defending the eastern border of the empire against the yellow
menace, Jerusalem would have the task of holding the Islamic world at
bay by controlling the Middle East from the Nile to the Euphrates,
imposing civilization and order. Berlin, as the traditional capital of
the “Empire of the Middle” of Western Europe, must be the control
center of the Eurosiberian empire where all the different threats that
face the empire are assessed and solutions proposed. All possibilities
for expansion that the empire might gain naturally collect themselves
in Germany since the latter is the gravitational epicenter where all
paths leading from the empire’s outer edges converge.

Israel, Germany and Russia have socialist traditions. Israel was built
on the principles of Red Zionism, with communal institutions, such as
the kibbutz system. Germany can look back on two attempts at building
a socialist society, the Third Reich and the German Democratic
Republic. Russia, of course, has the legacy of the Soviet Union, the
most powerful socialist empire that has yet existed. Since only a
socialist system can safeguard the racial integrity of the future
Eurosiberian empire (through the implementation of collective
institutions that serve the folk as a whole rather than the
individuals comprising it), it is important to build upon tried and
tested socialist systems of the past. Also, to counter the
American-Muslim condominium, an alliance that is opposed to the
American-Arab-Persian Axis of Evil must by necessity include all the
states that have a stake in the preservation of Western civilization.
Naturally, Israel, Germany and Russia are such states (together with
the other European nations, minus England which is an American satrap
and hence a potential enemy nation of the Eurosiberian empire).

While Anglo-American terrorism and aggression directed against all
peoples, and specifically against Europeans, continues unabated today,
it is important to remember and recognize that Israel, Germany and
Russia were some of the principal opponents of imperialism in the 20th
century. Jewish freedom fighters blew up the King David Hotel to force
the British to leave the Jews’ ancestral homeland. German National
Socialists fought a desperate battle in World War II to liberate
Western Europe from the clutches of American and British plutocracy.
Russian Bolsheviks built an empire that was the only one yet able to
oppose American hegemony on the same level in terms of military
strength as AmeriKa. Thus, the anti-imperialist traditions of national
liberation that were once practiced by Red Zionist Israel, National
Socialist Germany and Soviet Russia should serve as an inspiration for
the current struggle against the enslaving capitalist octopus.

Fundamentalist Islam is an agent of globalization. Hence, Muslim
fundamentalists are imperialists in their own right. They are tacit
collaborators of American imperialists in that they, like American
imperialists, are trying to suppress the self-determination of
traditional peoples and nations by imposing Sharia Law and making
everybody kneel five times a day in front of an alien and angry god.
Both AmeriKa and fundamentalist Islam want to create a new world order
- AmeriKa in the image of Mickey Mouse and McDonald’s and
fundamentalist Islam in the spirit of Mohammed and Allah. Pax
Americana or a global caliphate? Both of these doomsday scenarios
would spell the end for an independent Europe. Both AmeriKa and
fundamentalist Islam must be opposed. A future anti-imperialist
Eurosiberian empire must recognize that in order to survive it must
actively endorse all forces which undermine Americanism and
fundamentalist Islam while simultaneously strengthening identitarian
positions. Neither American imperialists nor fundamentalist Muslims
care about racial diversity. Both desire to transform humanity. While
one wants to create the Tan Everyman Consumer Robot, the other wants
to create the Muslim Everyman Slave. Eurosiberian activists must
thence be sternly opposed to BOTH the enemy agents of Americanism AND
fundamentalist Islam.

Racism is sacred. Diversity is the strength of humanity. Supremacy is
the strength of our race. To rule with a few the many is the destiny
of the ones that choose themselves. A chosen people chooses to be
chosen.

Posted by wintermute on July 24, 2007, 12:54 AM | #

This is why, for both spiritual and cultural reasons, it is important
that modern Israel be accepted as part of the future Eurosiberian
empire.

Bears repeating.

Constantin has a real future for himself. Not only would his insights be welcome on Lawrence Auster’s board and that of “The Realist”, I daresay he might find himself gainful and lucrative employment at one of the major neocon thinktanks: AEI, Heritage, Olin.

A good first step for him would be an interview with Jamie Glazov over at David Horowitz’ site. I’m sure an audience can be arranged, provided Constantin finally presents the name of which of his grandparents was one of the Red Army’s rapists, resulting in yet another German Jew who is stark raving bonkers.

Fundamentalist Islam is an agent of globalization

Gotta love that one, too. Once you’ve concocted the notion of Islamofascism, why not accuse them of being agents of globalization?

Maybe they’re all undercover agents for the Pope. What standing shall the Vatican have in the new Eurosiberian-Israeli wonderland?

Posted by Reiv on July 24, 2007, 04:40 AM | #

Somebody needs to catch Constantin whenever he’s not intoxicated and explain to him that what he wants is what we already have.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 24, 2007, 05:15 AM | #

Hey he was better in the interview, guys.  He must get carried away when he sits down at a keyboard or something ... No, the guy does have lots of good instincts, but ... there’s some stuff he’s very confused about, no doubt about it ...

Posted by wintermute on July 24, 2007, 05:44 AM | #

Hey he was better in the interview, guys.  He must get carried away when he sits down at a keyboard or something ... No, the guy does have lots of good instincts, but ... there’s some stuff he’s very confused about, no doubt about it ...

You are too kind.

Constantin should probably be remanded to the care of Dr. Huber, with whom he no doubt has many items of interest to discuss.

Consantin has been like this for years, and if, as you say, he was better in the interview, I can only imagine that it was a fleeting moment of lucidity occasioned, as Reiv suggests, by a General Strike affecting vodka production.

Posted by Lurker on July 24, 2007, 11:45 AM | #

“a General Strike affecting vodka production”

Superb!

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

Location: (optional)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)

captcha shown here

Next entry: Postcivil Society: The "Youth" Vectors of London

Previous entry: Pauline Hanson and the abuse of DNAPrint testing for multicultural ends

image of the day

Recent Comments

Neuköln commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 06:29 AM. (go) (view)

Diamed commented in entry 'How to save the world without harming a single hair on anyone's head' on 01/06/09, 05:41 AM. (go) (view)

ex ISKCON robot commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 04:35 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 03:50 AM. (go) (view)

the sangha commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 03:40 AM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 03:39 AM. (go) (view)

cladrastis commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 03:35 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 03:13 AM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 02:36 AM. (go) (view)

Drew Fraser commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 02:26 AM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 02:26 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 02:24 AM. (go) (view)

wow gold commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 01/06/09, 02:11 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 01:19 AM. (go) (view)

n/a commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 01:12 AM. (go) (view)

Rusty Mason commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 12:48 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 12:48 AM. (go) (view)

Drew Fraser commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 12:42 AM. (go) (view)

Ryder commented in entry 'How to save the world without harming a single hair on anyone's head' on 01/06/09, 12:35 AM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 12:29 AM. (go) (view)

Fred Scrooby commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/06/09, 12:21 AM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'Black Oak' on 01/06/09, 12:12 AM. (go) (view)

Armor commented in entry 'France and Flemish-France and the little uses of immigrants' on 01/05/09, 11:22 PM. (go) (view)

Gudmund commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 10:30 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 10:26 PM. (go) (view)

Gudmund commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 10:20 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Ten wishes for an all-American New Year' on 01/05/09, 10:06 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 09:52 PM. (go) (view)

Armor commented in entry 'How to save the world without harming a single hair on anyone's head' on 01/05/09, 08:57 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'Black Oak' on 01/05/09, 08:37 PM. (go) (view)

Armor commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 08:27 PM. (go) (view)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 08:11 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 07:52 PM. (go) (view)

im commented in entry 'Ten wishes for an all-American New Year' on 01/05/09, 07:43 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Drew Fraser at Inverell 2008' on 01/05/09, 07:11 PM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

EGI

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa