Christmas is Racist

Posted by Andrew on December 25, 2005, 09:58 PM | #

It is a good report, and displays the consciousness and Knowledge of people even 7000 years ago, and their ability to learn the basic’s of survival, obviously Islam and Liberalism did not exist then , so the only fear of enemy reprisals were tribal, Yes the picture is becoming a little clearer.

But if Christmas is Racist, then I am an outrageous racist bigot, of Hitler type proportions, or even Muhammad proportions, hmmmm , or Karl Marx Proportions.  NUHHH, I don’t fit that bill, only the Anglo co-operation bill proportions; which indicate to me a genetic link to what our ancestors used to protect and preserve themselves in consciousness on what was a danger to them and the need to survive. Would that be Tribal co-operation and skills learnt by reasoning and knowledge?
So what happened to that Consciousness now days?

Posted by Friedrich on December 25, 2005, 10:25 PM | #

Karl Marx was racist?

Posted by Andrew on December 25, 2005, 11:19 PM | #

Good question Friedrich, but Racist is probably a bad terminology, perhaps a Pathological hatred of people that did not (do not) conform to what they perceived to be Surreal-(Real). Ramping up Investigations to the next stage of Psychology to Neurology and what happens would best explain these people, and others, I would personally suggest that Tribal norms, i.e. Hanging out with your own race and Intellect is more comforting than accepting the way of some psychopath intent on destroying you, I think that is where the commonality of Anglo- Aryan- Genetic structure will kick in survival mode , unless the Psychopaths administer new drug’s to the rest of us, but even if that was to happen, we are all dead. So we will fight to survive against our aggressors in all shapes and forms.
That probably is the sum of my own naivety and well be disemboweled by others If I so capitulate to their antics. I can not surrender that, nor should any of us, nor shall we. If I am not right and correct, I certainly am not wrong? Whether that is Racist or an attempt to administer guilt on that premise to control my thoughts is a feeble attempt and will be met with equal contempt. That is where I am at, so probably al lot of us.

Posted by Matt on December 26, 2005, 10:33 AM | #

The amazing part is that you believe in our existance

7000 years ago

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 26, 2005, 01:33 PM | #

“The amazing part is that you believe in our existence 7000 years ago.  Christian & Jewish scriptures only date back around 5000 years. A discrepency of approx 2000 years.” (—Matt)

Matt, you misunderstood the log entry:  James Bowery wasn’t referring to Christians being around 7K years ago, but Euros.

Posted by Matt on December 27, 2005, 01:13 AM | #

But the bible and torah tell us that the world was only created 5000 years ago. The Bible is a flawless document, one that our entire civilisation has been built upon.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 27, 2005, 03:57 AM | #

Matt apparently thinks he’s being clever.  He’s decided to try sarcasm in order to get noticed since nothing else has worked.  It’s a relief to be able to say I’m ignoring the guy from now on.
______
—“All I know is that to see, and not to speak, would be the great betrayal.”—Enoch Powell
-- Moratorium-plus-Repatriation!
-- Balkanization is better than Brazilianization!
-- The 1965 Immigration-Holocaust Act:  the gift that keeps on giving!
-- What’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the usual suspects!
-- “White fellows fight back and we fight back hard; it is in our genes, being Anglos.”—Andrew

Posted by Matt on December 28, 2005, 06:14 AM | #

I fail to see what is sarcastic about “ The Bible is a flawless document, one that our entire civilisation has been built upon.”
To me this is a very true statement.
I only point out the discrepency in timelines as it is very easy for us to become sidetracked and forced into arguing on behalf of the liberals.
I certainly did not intend to cause any offence.
God be with you.

Posted by Igaz Mockingbird on January 29, 2006, 09:17 PM | #

“Strong feelings toward ancestral scenes—scenes so ancient and vital that they resulted in genetic adaptation—is racist.”

Please explain this statement rather than presenting it as fact.

Posted by Igaz Mockingbird on February 01, 2006, 06:24 PM | #

Thanks Scrooby Doo for the clarification. Being new to the existence of this site, I’m afraid I leaped before I looked. From what you are saying anyone who is contact with others of a different genetic background is guilty of “racism” just by condition of being alive. That what is called racism by the PC Police is actually an inherent trait of the human animal. And that whites are the only ones who get called out by the PC Police for this.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 01, 2006, 09:28 PM | #

“[A]ny [white person] who is in contact with others of a different genetic background is guilty of ‘racism’ just by condition of being alive. That what is called racism by the PC Police is actually an inherent trait of [white people]. And that whites are the only ones who get called out by the PC Police for this.” (—Igaz Mockingbird)

Igaz, yes, you’ve got it.  You’ve really got it down.  Those are the rules and that’s exactly how the game is played.  Of course there are additional nuances, hundreds of them, but what you’ve cited in that comment are a good chunk of the basics.  Congratulations!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 01, 2006, 09:54 PM | #

“what is called racism by the PC Police is actually [a completely innocent] inherent trait of [white people]” (—Igaz)

Here, look:  here’s how it works.  Let’s say you’re smarter than a co-worker, so generally put in a better job performance at work and as a result win a promotion for which the co-worker is deemed unqualified by the higher-ups.  If you’re white and the co-worker is Negro, the above facts by themselves prove you’re a racist regardless of any other details of the situation whatsoever.  Nothing, under the circumstances cited, can exonerate you from the guilt of being a racist.  Or, let’s say a young mother with toddlers is jealous of another young mother because the other’s toddlers are more attractive, or smarter, or whatever.  If the other is white and the first Negro, Mexican, or what-have-you, the white mother is racist and nothing can exonerate her, nothing.  It’s as simple as that:  she’s a racist.  What makes her a racist?  She’s a racist because her kids’ looks excited a Negro (or other non-white) woman’s jealousy.  These are the rules of the game.

Posted by Kate the Saxon on September 22, 2006, 07:24 AM | #

Oh!
So that’s why my adult children can’t get a free University education in their own country?

You mean I shouldda married a very brown Abo instead of that Scots/Irish/Danish fellow?

Pardonnez-moi!
I was brought up a Christian and didn’t think skin-colour mattered....

If only I’d known: my lovely little Vegemites would now own half of Australia and be allowed to stroll about naked and carrying large, sharp spears.

Instead, they live in well-constructed houses and buy their food at the shop.

Silly me.

Posted by Better Than You on December 14, 2006, 11:29 AM | #

YOU ARE RACIST.

Posted by Al Ross on December 14, 2006, 12:16 PM | #

Fred isnt a racist. He is. I believe, a racialist.

Visit some rather amusing racists with very strict views on the necessity of avoiding the Jewish Question at :

http://niggermania.org

Posted by Lurker on December 14, 2006, 12:17 PM | #

Better Than You - Pardon me, who you are addressing your remark to?

Posted by Wolf Hubler on December 17, 2006, 08:31 AM | #

I have read Mr. Scrooby’s remarks in regard to race and developmental necessity, I agree fully with what he states. Our problem (I state “our problem” because, I am of Alpine German decent, white, and targeted by the racist minority.)
is that we have been conditioned by our own institutions to surpress our urge to dominate as we had done in the past. In the United States anything “white”, “anglo”, or “manly” is surpressed and falls under the scrutiny of being racist or sexist. It seems to me the all the accomplishments of our white forefathers are being replaced with minority slander and mis-information. I am appalled by the behavior (and romanticism) of negro culture. In my encounters with it (negro culture) the only thing it seems to value is base pleasure. I have encountered many racist negroes who blatantly state that we (whites) are the minority of the world.
In the United States there has also been an increasingly alarming trend that leans toward the reward of dishonest behavior. Our institutions reward insubordinance, cowardice, punish agressive behavior and foster identity crisis within young white men. Therefore they (white youths) fear speaking their mind, or, are grossly misinformed and forsake their heritage. Black youths look at whites as being weak. Therefore they rob them of their women. The trend of inter-racial births is outstandingly disturbing. The Negro men here in the U.S. have an affinity for white women. What better way to destroy us than to corrupt our genetic code?
This should be interperated as the first step in the minority inficting an act of genocide upon our people, and therefore should not be tolerated. As our fathers have done so before us, we must rise. This suppression is an active agression set forth to anihilate our culture. It is time we rise the flag that is torn from nothing and act as men. I am as you are, and together we shall manifest destiny. NOW IS THE TIME!

Posted by ja on February 18, 2007, 03:26 AM | #

mr.scrooby i see your writings is constantly calling blacks negroes..first of all, blacks aren’t negroes..negroes is a hate word that whites and others call them...blacks are nubians, if you were so intelligent like you think you are, you would’ve known that...you’re a coward and an ignorant bastard, you wouldn’t have the balls to call blacks negroes in their faces that’s why you’re hiding behind a computer monitor and write dumb stuff like that...you’re what’s wrong with white americans… when a white man is called a devil, he gets mad and he really gets to transforming into a red being, and when you’re looking at a full-blooded white person’s home-pictures, their eyes is usually red. maybe the myth is true...the myth is about the devil-being on planet earth...a lot of them run from truth, and most of them ignores the truth about the injustice on minorities that is going on in their society… uhhhmm maybe a full-blooded caucasian is the devil being…

Posted by Al Ross on February 18, 2007, 07:19 AM | #

There is, naturally, some entertainment value to be derived from Niggerbabble such as JA’s Chimp-logic.

It is vaguely reminiscent of the puerile fairy-tales with which the Nigger nonsense-peddlers of the Nation of Islam beguile their dangerously cretinous African-descended converts.