Is Dr. David Duke, Ph.D., a Kosher Nazi?

Posted by Concerned white on November 04, 2008, 12:52 PM | #

Google searches for Eric Hufschmid return Zionist disinfo agent provocateur.

White Supremacists are Zionists

Posted by Z on November 04, 2008, 02:01 PM | #

“The white man must therefore investigate what really happened in Nazi Germany.”

For those interested in this subject, a good start can be found in reading some of the speeches of Ezra Pound; some call(ed) him a “freedom-hating anti-Semitic fascist,” when in reality he was a “liberty-loving Jew aware Euro-socialist.”

Dig in: http://www.yamaguchy.netfirms.com/7897401/pound_ezra/radioPound.html OR http://www.amazon.com/Ezra-Pound-Speaking-Speeches-Contributions/dp/0313200572/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1225806924&sr=1-1

---

Re: “Hey Rabbi...watcha doin”

Yes, evidence for this is popping up more and more often:

“Arrrests in Baltimore anti-Semitic graffiti”
October 8, 2008

Three Jews have been arrested in connection with anti-Semitic graffiti in Baltimore.

Two adults and one juvenile – all reportedly Jews – were charged Tuesday with misdemeanors for destruction of property and damage to a religious entity, according to the Baltimore Jewish Times.

They allegedly defaced signs at Baltimore Hebrew Congregation and Beth Tfiloh Synagogue advertising the Baltimore Associated’s fall campaign. The signs were found Sunday morning with spray-painted inverted swastika symbols and the phrases “Nazis” and “WK.”

A police spokesman told the Times that investigators do not believe the case is “hate-related.”

- http://www.jta.org/news/article/2008/10/08/110724/daysawe

Posted by Diamed on November 04, 2008, 02:38 PM | #

I disagree with everything you said here.  The holocaust was real, I’ve seen the videos and pictures, read the first hand accounts, there’s way too many witnesses, and it would be impossible to cover up if it were a lie.  McVeigh did the Oklahoma City bombing, muslims did 9/11.  Banking and free trade, though complicated, is not diabolical but just capitalism in action.  Capitalism has been proven to make countries twice as rich as their socialist/communist rivals and everyone is far better off under these ‘diabolical banking schemes’ than third world piss holes where they can’t even afford water, sanitation, health care or electricity.  Read IQ and the Wealth of Nations and you’ll see a direct correlation between wealth and economic freedom.  That completely blows a hole in your ‘evil bankers bankrupting the world’ idea, in fact it’s the opposite, they enrich the world.

David Duke is an honorable man who only goes where the evidence takes him.  That’s why he doesn’t endorse insane conspiracy theories or crackpot economic theories like the ones you’ve listed above.

The reason Duke gets so much airtime is because his view is popular and convincing, it gives high ratings to give duke a chance to share his views because so many whites agree with him.  he won 60% of the white vote in the louisiana election, that’s millions of votes!  More than the internet traffic of every white nationalist site combined.  Attacking Duke is insane, he is our BEST representative to the wider world.  He uses moderate language to be more palatable, he’s careful because anything he ever says will be used against him so he must always be 100% right or lose his credibility.  Anyone could see that this is due to self-control and devotion to the cause, and yet you paint him a traitor for it.  Nonsense.

I don’t think ‘persecution’ is the cause of jewish behavior, but the will to power, innate in all human beings.  Jews are just more effective because they have higher IQ.  Any group in power will be diabolical to the out-groups they control, whites were exactly the same.  We genocided the natives we invaded, enslaved blacks, forced the opium trade on China, conquered India and forced unfair trade deals on them, etc, etc.  It’s also well known how Asians in power treat their designated out-groups, look at Cambodia, Vietnam, and China and all the tens of millions that were massacred there.  Look at their historical slave raids and eunechs.  Look at Rwanda, Congo, Idi Amin, South Africa, Zimbabwe those blacks in power slaughtering the out-group with disdain.  Look at the history of jihad, one massive slaughter of the out-group.  We shouldn’t expect pity or remorse from those in power because it’s stupid and evolutionarily pointless to preserve your competitors or not take what you can get.  If we ever do get back in power, don’t think it will be because we’re ‘nice’, ‘fair,’ or ‘gentle.’ That kind of white ideology will never prevail in this world.  The will to power, ends justify the means, Turner Diaries type white power movement is the only philosophy strong enough and cruel enough to live in the real world.

Rather than somehow twist facts such that whites are never responsible for hurting anyone, why not just accept that life is war, mankind is feral and genocide is no big deal?  Jews genocided whites in Russia, whites genocided jews in Germany, now jews are genociding whites again in America, and someday whites will genocide Jews again, it’s just the flow of life.  Kill or be killed.  There’s no reason to lie and invent crazy conspiracy theories to defend ourselves, the proper stance is a direct, honest, ‘better him than me.’

Posted by Bo on November 04, 2008, 03:51 PM | #

One key to decoding who is who can be found by a close reading of articles and essays. When a writer claims to have the best interests of the diverse white peoples at heart, yet uses the Jewish names ("gentiles," “goyim,” shiksa") for us, all kinds of alarms should go off.

Your heart and mind lies near your name which is fundamental to your identity, and to adopt a name imposed on us from another group is shocking evidence that the heart and mind do not belong to the diverse white peoples, but to those slapping us with a name ("goyim," “gentiles,” “shiksa") that smothers our diversity, that denies our right to name ourselves, and that provides evidence of a claim to supremacy by claiming the right to name us.

I guess adopting names imposed by the other would be an example of what this message board calls “extended phenotype” at the most local, focused level.

Posted by QUESTION on November 04, 2008, 04:08 PM | #

Is the co-editor of AmRen the Jew Michael Levin?

If so, maybe that’s why all discussion of Jews is banned at AmRen…

Posted by Guessedworker on November 04, 2008, 05:16 PM | #

First of all, JR you do yourself no favours through the use of intemperate Stormfront terminology like “leeches”, “criminals” and the rest.  “Jew this ... Jew that” is out of sinc with our way of doing things, and something I’d much rather was left to hardcore, single-issue Judeophobic sites.

Second, the open-minded examination of a claimed Jewish involvement in or instigation of the events you mention here can only be set-back by the use of such language.  It is necessary to exhibit a responsible, balanced and unemotional approach, or everything is lost to garlic-waving.  MR readers in particular deserve such an approach.  I am pretty sure they do not wish to be treated to Herr Goebbels’ dazzling media skills, whether or not they are “awake” in the way you mean.

Third, as a rule prominent race-loyal activists tend to fall under the suspicion of collaboration in some respect.  In Europe it is the Security Services.  In America, that plus organised Jewry.  The phenomenon is quite interesting in its own right, and would repay some research - not least because there are an unknown number of collaborators out there, and they should be exposed.

As a general rule, I would say that the more prominent the activist, the more likely he will attract suspicion - and the more necessary, therefore, that only a really strong case be brought against him.  Your case against David Duke does not appear too strong yet.  But if you are convinced of it, you owe it to others to strengthen it if you can.

Posted by zuwr on November 04, 2008, 05:39 PM | #

David Duke believes that affirmative action, immigration, and black crime are more immediate to concerns to white people than the Holocaust, 9/11, and the OKC bombing.  If you want to attract people to the cause, you talk about things people can relate to.  I respect him for his efforts.  That said, I feel that your article is contrary to the intent of the New Orleans Protocol.  Specifically, “In other words, no enemies on the right”.
See here:  http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=135634

Please retract the insult “kosher”.  If not, I won’t read anything that you write.

Posted by Selous Scout on November 04, 2008, 05:52 PM | #

Diamed wrote: The will to power, ends justify the means, Turner Diaries type white power movement is the only philosophy strong enough and cruel enough to live in the real world.

Well said, Diamed.  This is wonderful, much better than I would have put it. I don’t quite grasp the point of JR’s post attacking DD.  This sort of thing only promotes discord.

Posted by Populares on November 04, 2008, 06:01 PM | #

Surely the above post is a satire? A reductio ad absurdam a la mode the criticism of Jews. The post, turned on its head, is even more pernicious. By stating that the Jews are responsible for everything, you state that White (non-Jews) are responsible for nothing. You have completely belittled a people. For Marx´s heartening cry “Workers of the world unite” you have written “Whites of the world are always in flight.”

Diamed´s post adequately sums up the rest of my reply.

Posted by Lurker on November 04, 2008, 06:33 PM | #

GW - Sync or synch, but not sinc.

Posted by Armor on November 04, 2008, 06:42 PM | #

I think J.Richards’ article is completely absurd, and I agree with the first half of Diamed’s post. But I wonder why Diamed always thinks he should go over the top:

“ someday whites will genocide Jews again, it’s just the flow of life.  Kill or be killed. ”

It isn’t true that people of different races are always at each other’s throat. I won’t be surprised if we have a few civil wars in the near future, but anti-immigration activists will not be responsible for that.
If we had our way, we would simply stop immigration, we would encourage immigrants to return home, we would forcefully expel some of them in a humane way, and we would make it easier for white people to live among white people. It is not exactly “kill or be killed”.

Posted by Darren on November 04, 2008, 06:42 PM | #

The holocaust was real, I?ve seen the videos and pictures, read the first hand accounts, there?s way too many witnesses, and it would be impossible to cover up if it were a lie
(Diamed)

But that is exactly what they’re doing - its a crime in most EU countries to try to investigate the holocaust from a revisionist perspective, and its career and social suicide to do it anywhere else. So, its impossible for anyone to do a through and honest investigation of the matter. This is a coverup.

I certainly believe there was executions of some number of Jews, but the six million number is difficult to substantiate, the methods that were allegedly used are fraught with a lack of evidence, and many technical errors given in the official narratives.

I believe this is the general position of most serious revisionists today.

Capitalism has been proven to make countries twice as rich as their socialist/communist rivals and everyone is far better off under these ?diabolical banking schemes? than third world piss holes where they can?t even afford water, sanitation, health care or electricity.  Read IQ and the Wealth of Nations and you?ll see a direct correlation between wealth and economic freedom.  That completely blows a hole in your ?evil bankers bankrupting the world? idea, in fact it?s the opposite, they enrich the world.

I don’t care about the third world, so the argument that we’re enriching them through economic colonialization is not relevant to me.

White countries enjoy prosperity and a good standard of living under traditional cultural orders. Global capitalism degrades our culture and society down to mere pleasures derived from materialism and monetary transactions. I hardly would call that “enriching” from our perspective - except for the plutocrats’ pocketbooks. The argument for me is not between capitalism and communism - its between systems that value money and systems that value culture and tradition.

If you need examples of bankers corrupting the world - its all around us from manufactured wars, environmental disasters, cultural destruction, pluralism, race-replacement, etc.

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 04, 2008, 08:20 PM | #

The Jews will most suredly attempt to destroy efforts by whites to organize along racial lines, and they do so by infiltrating white nationalist circles, rendering them useless; blackmailing genuine white nationalists with serious moral weaknesses into working for them; and setting up fake Nazi groups to portray white nationalists as crazies, loons and criminals.

It’s not without precedent.

John Garrity, the CJC agent who helped out the rag-tag band of wannabes, didn’t do as much as Grant Bristow did, in terms of organizing neo-Nazis, and he didn’t do as much as Warman did, in terms of spreading anti-Semitic and racist hate. But the fact remains, the Canadian Jewish Congress pitched in, helping to prop up the haters they were publicly fighting against. And—surprise!—in a self-serving article, Garrity wrote that his work was extremely important, and that the rag-tag nobodies he helped out were a real menace. The only thing missing was the pitch for readers to donate money to the CJC and the rest of the anti-hate industry.

Let’s get serious. Barely 20 years after Nazi Germany was crushed into powder by the Allies, with Canada taking an oversized role in the battle, when the streets of Canada were teeming with war veterans who hated Nazism with every cell of their body, when Nazism had been utterly discredited in the public mind, when there was no possible chance of that ideology finding intellectual purchase in Canada, let alone actual power, the CJC was trumping up the menace—led by a vain, 24-year-old nobody.

Why?

Because that’s the moral hazard of the being in the anti-hate business. If there’s not enough hate, you have to change your line of work. Or: as the CJC did in 1966, and as they’re doing today through the human rights commissions, they drum up a fake danger, manufacture a menace, help them out even, and then expose the whole thing and posit themselves as the remedy.

I just don’t know what’s wrong with the Jews sometimes. We have enough real enemies out there—even in 1966, before the West turned against Israel after the Six Day War ended the Jews’ status as the world’s underdogs, and with it ended the pity honeymoon that had existed since the Holocaust. Even then, the Jews had enough real enemies, and there were real enough Jewish issues. Today it’s far worse, with radical Islamists planning the next Holocaust.

I just don’t get it. But Bernie “Burny” Farber and the rest of his industry know a good gig when they see one. They’re just running the Garrity-Bristow-Warman game one more time. It makes them heroes in their own mind, and it gets them lots of press. But it’s dishonest. And today, with militant Islam on the rise, there are enough real fights to fight without making up fake ones.

UPDATE: A commenter writes to say that he was there in Toronto when Beattie, the 24-year-old leader of the rag-tag Canadian Nazi Party had its rally in Toronto—with 20 people in tow. The commenter’s point was to suggest that I have overstated the CJC’s role in assisting the Nazi Party. Maybe—though any support is bizarre. But what I actually glean from the commenter’s report was the opposite message: that Beattie and his “party” could only muster 20 followers in a city of millions. This was a national threat? Of course not. But with a little finessing, it could be built up into a menace that would terrify Jews and Gentiles alike.

Brought to you by the CJC.

Posted by Englander on November 04, 2008, 08:52 PM | #

Diamed wrote: The holocaust was real, I’ve seen the videos and pictures,

I don’t consider myself a holocaust revisionist, (not anymore anyway) but statements such as yours simply tell me that you yourself aren’t familiar enough with the subject to have an informed opinion.  ‘Seeing the photos’ tell you nothing, as there doesn’t exist a photograph which contradicts the revisionists’ claims.

As for this article, I personally think it’s below MR standards and the subjects themselves are harmful to the cause.  Personally, I reserve more suspicion for people who harp on about holocaust revisionism and Jewish 9/11 conspiracies than I do for people who wisely ignore these issues.

Posted by Old Guy on November 04, 2008, 08:52 PM | #

I’d like to suggest a reformulation of the “New Orleans Protocol”.  Rather than “No Enemies on the Right”, how about “No Enemies of the White” ???  While this begs the question of exactly what “White” is, it sets the boundaries in a fashion which might lessen internecine squabbles which are destructive vis-a-vis the “real outsiders”.

Posted by James Bowery on November 04, 2008, 09:02 PM | #

While I’m not exactly in JR’s camp on this, I certainly concede that moral high ground is more crucial to our folk than virtually any other—which is precisely why our indigenous myths and authorities are most viciously attacked in “the culture war”.

To dismiss the importance of Holocaustianity is to misunderstand the biological morality of our people.

Appeals to simple Malthusian “us or them” argumentation is not going to work precisely because our people are the least Malthusian as evidenced by our enormous creation of carrying capacity!

If we go to war, there has to be moral justification and I would submit the morals that appeal to our nature are more in line with natural sciences than any other people:

Let the fair contest decide according to the laws of Nature’s God.

The only question then becomes:  “What is the fair contest?”

I would argue that it cannot be war for the simple reason that war is so profoundly dysgenic.

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 04, 2008, 09:28 PM | #

The Heritage Front Affair
Report to the Solicitor General of Canada
Security Intelligence Review Committee
December 9, 1994

On June 12, 1992, Michael Lublin, a member of the Kitchener- Waterloo Jewish community and the self-professed “highest ranking Jewish member of the Reform Party went on national television to denounce the party as racially intolerant and antisemitic, and to declare that a Reform Government would be a disaster for Canada."[160] [...]

Lublin first told us that John Toogood and Bernie Farber, the Canadian Jewish Congress Director of Community Relations were working together to discredit the Reform Party.[173] He later said they did not work together toward the goal.[l74] Lublin also says that he had a conversation with Hugh Segal, Advisor to Prime Minister Brian Mulroney.[175]

Both Toogood and the CJC Director have stated that they have never met or spoken to each other, much less conspired together.[176] Both completely denied they ever tried to discredit the Reform Party. Hugh Segal received a message from Lublin but does not believe he ever spoke to him. Segal says he had his secretary give the name of a party official to Lublin to contact, wary of the negative comments Lublin made about his former mentors in the Reform Party.[177]

It was learned that in November 1992, Lublin called Droege (Founder of the Heritage Front) for information about a lecture by British Nazi sympathizer, writer David Irving. Droege said it was a closed meeting, but authorized Lublin to inform the media. Lublin stressed they keep their association with one another secret and Droege agreed.[179]

In the Spring of 1993, Preston Manning came to Oshawa. Lublin said that lawyer Louis Allore called him in Florida to say he wanted to discredit Manning. He would pay Droege $500 to have the Heritage Front “hound Manning” in May or June 1993. Allore told Lublin that Droege does not get paid until the “stunt” appears in the newspaper.[180] [...]

Bristow was aware that Michael Lublin was an anti-racist who wanted to be a spokesperson for the Jewish community. The hearsay within the Heritage Front was that Lublin had his eye on the Director of Community Relations’ job at the Canadian Jewish Congress.[181] Bristow overheard some of the conversations between Wolfgang Droege and Michael Lublin: Lublin did not like Reform and wanted to be seen as a peacemaker between the Nazis and the Jews. As a negotiator, he could make a name for himself.[182] Bristow took a photograph of Lublin and Droege arm-in-arm together.

Alan Overfield said that Michael Lublin was a case of “sour grapes”. Although Lublin accused the Reform Party of being racist, he still attended their meetings. Lublin knew Droege by his first name and he was involved in a lot of manipulation in the Jewish Community.[183]

Bristow believed that Wolfgang Droege received cash from a Bay Street fellow to attend Reform Party meetings to discredit and embarrass the Party. Bristow was of the opinion that Lublin coordinated the contacts but that the money came from the other person.[184]

We received reports that someone called CITY TV in Toronto to tell them that Droege would attend Reform Party meetings. The staff we spoke to at CITY TV denied they were informed in advance of Heritage Front activities.[185] The Source, however stated that it was “standard methodology” for someone to call CITY TV in Toronto to tell them that Droege would attend Reform Party meetings. A Reform Party member and advisor has stated that reporter Colin Vaughn was present at some of the Reform Party demonstrations.[l86] Droege said he had no knowledge about the CITY TV matter.[187]

Droege told Bristow that Lublin thought it was a good idea if Droege went to Reform Party meetings: Lublin would call the press to make sure Reform was discredited. The Review Committee has confirmed that Michael Lublin made at least some of the calls.[188]

It was learned that Lublin told Droege during April 1993 that he had contacted the media to tell them, that Heritage Front members voted at the John Gamble nomination meeting. He later said that he told reporter Colin Vaughn that this made him fearful as a Jew. He suggested that two well-known officials in the Reform Party be made the fall guys. Droege agreed.

In April 1993, Droege told Bristow that the Heritage Front might wish to engage Michael Lublin for publicity purposes and also the two groups could work together to discredit Preston Manning and the Reform Party. The Source subsequently learned that Lublin had some personal grudge against the Reform Party and is seeking to form a clandestine alliance with the Heritage Front.

It was further learned that Lublin told Droege that the Heritage Front should publicly claim that Lublin was their (HF) primary opponent. Lublin would like the notoriety to establish himself as the guardian of the Jewish community and to weaken groups like the Canadian Jewish Congress and the B’nai Brith. Lublin even suggested that the HF should blow up his personal vehicle so that he could show the public that he was an important Neo-nazi enemy.

Lublin was reported as saying to Droege that the two [?]ould feed off one another to gain maximum media exposure. Droege confided to the Source that he would be open to a mutual campaign of publicity and controversy with Lublin.

Posted by Joe on November 04, 2008, 10:09 PM | #

9-11 conspiracy theories are for retards.  WN needs to get away from that kind of crap and focus on mainstream politics like European nationalist parties do.

Posted by Orion14 on November 04, 2008, 10:55 PM | #

9-11 conspiracy theories are for retards.  WN needs to get away from that kind of crap and focus on mainstream politics like European nationalist parties do.

God if that isn’t the truth.  It’s enough to know that the government in cooperation with the jews knew what was going to happen and allowed it.  This crap about no arabs involved or remote controlled airplanes is Art Bell blight wing BULLSHIT.

The holohoax is not real.  The persecution of Jews is real, the pit machinegunning of jew is real, but there are no eye witnesses to gas chambers or any documentation as to a systematic extermination plan, and that is the heart of the hoax.

Posted by Dave Johns on November 04, 2008, 11:07 PM | #

Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

Posted by wjg on November 04, 2008, 11:07 PM | #

J Richards makes some interesting points but one of the things that drives me nuts about white nationalism as it currently stands is our tendency to consume ourselves.  Whether the motivation is well intended or not becomes secondary to the fact of the detrimental fallout.  Jewry may or may not have some goods on Duke which may have compromised his mission to a degree.  If so Jewry is doing a crappy job of turning the screws to get him kosherized.  I would guess the reason for Duke’s emphasis on the subprime lending view of Jewry’s latest swindle is because that’s where he saw the evidence pointing.  Richards make a pretty good case of a different swindle but it is very unwise and unfair to attribute treacherous motivation to Duke for currently concluding otherwise especially given his work taken as a whole.

Remember Duke is a politician and thinks more practically than a scholar but even at that he steers a pretty straight course advocating for our interests as best I can tell.  He is working on the margins of where he thinks he can affect positive change for Whites.  He is not above criticism but claiming he is now a tool of Judah is going way too far.

Now as awakened as I have become on the Jewish Question I think it wise to remember they are not omnipotent.  We should follow where the evidence points not with a motivation to be fair to them - I could care less since their actions show they want us dead - but to be fair to us.  We need to know the real causes of our varying maladies so they can best be dealt with and we emerge strong and whole.  With that in mind I have found most of the 911 conspiracy theories way overwrought.  I am currently convinced that it is largely as ZOG says though it is responsible for creating the conditions that brought the attack about.

Diamed,

When one refers to “the Holocaust” the devil is in the details.  Were jews confined by the Nazis in concentration camps?  Yes, clearly.  Were jews discriminated against by German law?  Yes, clearly. Is that worthy to be called a “Holocaust”?  To a jew yes.  Hell, 6 million jews were holocausted in the Great War according to some jewish sources until that lie became no longer tenable.

Were 6 MILLION JEWS systematically murdered primarily by poison gas under the guise of delousing?  This is where the “Holocaust” falls flat on its face.  Read about this part of the story from brave men like Zundel, Rudolph, Toben, etc.

Remember those videos at the end of the war that showed piles of emaciated bodies were the direct result of disease and starvation that ravaged the camps due in large part to the judeo-communist-capitalist total war campaign.

Maguire does a good job of critiquing some of the assertions of the “Holocaust” at FAEM, especially applying actuarial logic to the supposed “survivors” of the last few years.  The story just doesn’t fit and criminalization of its investigation just confirms that it is a hoax, a swindle, and is another tool in the real Holocaust of Euro-Man.

Bo,

I see some of what you are saying in regards to naming and being named.  Still I like to use words like “Goy” and “Gentile” when describing us as seen by Jewry since it shows how they dehumanize us with their labels.  Shouldn’t our people be reminded that to the Jew we are cattle?  I look at it as a slap in the face that needs to be repeated until enough of us wake up and strike back.

Posted by a Finn on November 05, 2008, 12:10 AM | #

J. Richards can write well and intelligently, but he often seems to have a compulsion to use foul language and when he writes about the Jews, he often loses healthy criticism and intelligence.

“Everything starts with the S & L (Savings and Loan) collapse of 1982
From 1973 to 1982 the Federal Reserve ... flooded the economy with credit, and the result was a major farm property and commodity inflation. Midwestern farmers, buoyed by inflated asset prices, and encouraged on by the banks borrowed excessive amounts of cash. Everything was fine until 1982, when the Federal Reserve drove interest rates to 22%, and commodity prices collapsed.”

It was much more complex than that and there were many contributing factors.

- Money’s quality is not decided by it’s ties to e.g. gold or lack of it. Money created out of nothing can be perfectly good money if it is regulated with proper rules.

- Deregulation and increasing competition in money and securities market compelled conservative traditional bank to engage in riskier businesses. E.g now accounts, money market mutual funds, junk bonds, securitization etc. were new businesses, replacing much of the traditional loan and savings businesses.

- Improving commercial paper market increased available information, widened the financing markets and created opportunities for firms to get financing from other, often more economical sources than banks.

- The competition reduced their profits.

- Required reserves percentage were reduced by politicians and Federal reserve (loan to reserve funds ratio).

- Officials guaranteed deposits against bankrupty to high sums, creating a moral hazard, i.e. encouraging irresponsible and risky businesses.

- Guaranteed deposits and the worsening of it by brokered deposits caused adverse selection in customers, i.e. increasing the percentage of bad customers likely to default on their loans. Adverse selection and asymmetric information.

- When problems emerged, officials followed regulatory forbearance, because the didn’t have enough money to guarantee the deposits and they wanted to avoid accusations. They hoped the problems would go away, when they swept the problems under the mat. Principal agent problem (Regulator or politician doesn’t have the same incentives to minimize costs to the economy as principal agents [taxpayers]).

- Many politicians were dependent on campaign finances from weak banks and then pressured the regulators to more regulatory forbearance, decreased the regulators funding and passed legislation favourable to the weak banks. Principal agent problem. By the way, Keating five included John McCain, who had sold himself to bad banks at the expense of taxpayers.

- Armies of lawyers found loopholes for banks in courts.

- When things turned bad, the banks gambled heavily to survive, increasing the losses. Moral hazard.

Etc.

This series contains information about Federal reserve and it is an example of good matter fact approach:

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=511

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=786

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=936

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=5683

Posted by Calvin on November 05, 2008, 01:01 AM | #

“To address Henry’s questions, crypto-Jews/agents for the Jews are obviously regulars at stormfront, but the question is how deep is the infiltration”

The “will to power” may be a universal human imperative, but human beings are also chronic self-justifiers who will never accept this cold uncomfortable reality. Consequently anyone who trots out phrases like, “man is a feral savage” will simply be perceived as someone who has read too many Robert E Howard novels. Likewise “naming the Jew”, or to take paranoia to its logical conclusion, naming the “crypto-Jew”, is for most people offering a solution to a problem that is non-existent in the first place. It seems to be accepted that one of the best weapons that the liberal cultural-elite have of destroying the credibility of the nascent anti-liberal counter-culture is to mount sting operations that portray them as Nazis and Klansmen. How much more stupid is it then to portray yourself in this light without prompting? How hard do the ADL have to try to portray people of European ethnicity as Nazis when hundreds of them flock to a website calling itself “Stormfront” in gothic typeface? SF is a nice little corral where nationalists can be led and gently nudged toward violent expressions of their instinct for cultural self preservation under the careful eye of their ideological enemies. Every so often a few chicken is the farmyard will be slaughtered and a coupe of sheep will be lured from the corral so that the wolves can re-emphasize how dangerous these creatures are. If you ain’t part of the solution, you’re part of the problem!

Posted by ben tillman on November 05, 2008, 05:05 AM | #

I disagree with everything you said here.  The holocaust was real, I’ve seen the videos and pictures, read the first hand accounts, there’s way too many witnesses, and it would be impossible to cover up if it were a lie.  McVeigh did the Oklahoma City bombing, muslims did 9/11.

I disagree with everything you said here.  There simply aren’t videos and pictures or first-hand accounts of “The Holocaust”, so you can’t have seen or heard them.  There may be film of and testimony regarding bits and pieces of a “Holocaust”, but that’s not what you claimed.

The Feds and SPLC used and assisted McVeigh to effectuate the OKC bombing.  The fact that undetonated explosives were found in the Murrah building proves the complicity of the Feds, and the SPLC’s involvement has been supported by considerable evidence as well.  The SPLC still can’t conceal its glee regarding the harm the OKC bombing did to the “militia movement”.

The notion that Muslims “did” 9/11 without the cooperation of the national government is, to be blunt, stupid.  There is simply no evidence whatsoever for such a belief, aside from the bald assertions of the party with the greatest motive and opportunity to do the job.

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 05, 2008, 05:41 AM | #

It seems to be accepted that one of the best weapons that the liberal cultural-elite have of destroying the credibility of the nascent anti-liberal counter-culture is to mount sting operations that portray them as Nazis and Klansmen.

The point is Calvin, you can be a card carrying member of PETA, fighting for the rights of cows and pigs, however, if you criticize the wrong people, you’re labeled anti-Semitic. Why forsake your ancestors, virtuous men who attempted to stand at the gates and stop the erosion of values they held dear, when no matter what you will be acclaimed as evil.

Posted by Matra on November 05, 2008, 06:28 AM | #

Why forsake your ancestors, virtuous men who attempted to stand at the gates and stop the erosion of values they held dear, when no matter what you will be acclaimed as evil.

Because most of the descendants of those virtuous men are more repelled by Nazis than by anything else. You have to work with the population you’ve got. To believe a German movement of the 20th century is the way forward is pure fantasism.

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 05, 2008, 06:43 AM | #

If you’re basing it on the population you’ve got, believing any nationalistic movement is the way forward is pure fantasy. Thinking that you’ll throw off Moloch’s boot by saying we “weren’t ignoble to our Jews” is nothing more than a Timothy Leary moment.

Posted by Calvin on November 05, 2008, 10:02 AM | #

“Why forsake your ancestors, virtuous men who attempted to stand at the gates and stop the erosion of values they held dear, when no matter what you will be acclaimed as evil”

Well Desmond, I’d like to move on from “attempting” to “succeeding”. One way we might begin to do that is by lessening the credibility of these acclamations, by rejecting the costume box that the cultural elite keeps absent mindedly leaving on our doorstep. I don’t want to stand at the gate and fail heroically. I’d rather skulk in the woods dressed in buckskin and snipe from behind cover*. In any enterprise you should look for your role models in the ranks of the successful, not in the ranks of the failed.

*I must make it crystal clear that I’m using a military analogy to describe a non-violent ideological strategy here.

Posted by J Richards on November 05, 2008, 11:20 AM | #

Guessedworker, You have to give me more credit than my coming up with a ‘Jew this, Jew that’ argument.  The task is not easy.  I asked myself how can I write the essay so as to prevent my former unacquainted self from summarily dismissing the gist upon its first reading.  I don’t how to do so.  I certainly don’t have your command of English.

Regarding leeches and parasites, the first time I read about Stiglitz and his Nobel Prize, in the context of the chapter that the excerpt is taken from, it had an unsettling effect on me.  I couldn’t get the following image out of my mind.  I pictured people fighting for scraps of food thrown in dumpsters and people watching their children starve while Jewish bankers are scheming on how to leech more money from these desperate persons.  How does one put this in words?  ‘Dirty, filthy, scheming, conniving, criminal Jews’ came to mind.  I felt the need to add more words, and failing to find suitable terms, settled with ‘beneath contempt’ and ‘beyond despicable,’ among others that are best left unsaid.  In the essay I have greatly constrained myself by using more kosher terms that are clear in reference to what behaviors they correspond to or generic as in ‘criminal.’ I also question to what extent writing the essay in a more neutral manner would make it more receptive to the skeptic.  It would make almost no difference. 

The other question is how does one euphemistically refer to parasitic behaviors?  There is nothing honorable about being a parasite.

I would say the more prominent the activist, the more likely he is to be scrutinized, not necessarily the more likely to arouse suspicion.  The behavior of the activist, not mere prominence is the primary determinant of suspicion.

I know I have to do a better job, and I will be responding to comments and having more to say on Duke over the next couple of days.

Posted by the Narrator.. on November 05, 2008, 11:43 AM | #

You gotta give Stormfront credit for numbers tactics. The site currently states, “Due to overwhelming traffic, guests temporarily cannot view Stormfront content. You may register and login to view and join in the discussion.”

Nifty way to momentarily boost membership by luring in all those curious post-Obama win lurkers.

Stormfront is still good for the news section, but ideologically they chose the Amren route when they purged the older more strident members such as Mauddib.
Those former members now run the Whitenationalist.info site which is 10X better than stormfront in terms of collected information such as books, essays, speechs etc, on issues such as the Civil War, WW II and so on.

Why forsake your ancestors, virtuous men who attempted to stand at the gates and stop the erosion of values they held dear, when no matter what you will be acclaimed as evil.

Because most of the descendants of those virtuous men are more repelled by Nazis than by anything else. You have to work with the population you’ve got. To believe a German movement of the 20th century is the way forward is pure fantasism.

Posted by Matra

They’re also increasingly repelled by the Founding Fathers, Southern Confederates, Crusaders, Inquisitors, European Explorers, past White Scientists, Politicians, Theologians, Engineers etc, etc…

I wrote the following a while back in regards to Christianity and The West, but the general theme applies in regards to how Whites attempt to uphold what is left of the Western World by defending its past,

For the past 60+ years Western Civilization has been on trial without a general defense being presented. Accusations, slurs and innuendos have gone unchallenged as Western Man has accepted, without investigation, the acridity of the claims leveled against his civilization by his enemies.

Imperialism, Colonialism, Racism, Intolerance, Prejudice etc....

Where is the defense?

Where is the Western Apologetic?

Today’s Christian leaders have acquiesced to the claims by the Left upon Western History. They nod in agreement with the Left’s denouncements of everything from The Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition to Colonialism and Southern history. And they do so deferring to the scholarship of the Left’s own propagandists.

These Christian leaders have made no attempt at an Apologetic in defense of The West; crusades, slavery, colonialism, racism etc…

You see, the Left did not attack Christianity to undermine Western Civilization.
They attacked Western Civilization to undermine its Christianity.

And it worked!

The Christian has now become a glaring hypocrite because he gleefully nods at Southern Slavery being called evil, yet now chocks on calling homosexuality or abortion evil.

The result: the Christian today scourers the Bible to find ways of defending the Left’s attacks upon the very people who have historically espoused the Christian faith!

Had the Christian halted the proceedings at the first accusation against the Crusader or Slave owner and challenged the claim by developing an apologetic on their behalf, he would have, in essence, stood his post at the Western Gates and pushed his enemy into retreat.
Instead, he left his post, dropped his armor and aided the sworn enemy of all that he holds dear in despoiling his Civilization, Country, City, Home and Family.
He has become a traitor.

And as his enemy stands unaccosted in the village square shouting endless profanities and slanders against his countryman’s forefathers, he wonders why his sons have become apathetic, if not hostile, to those forefather’s faith.

...

Posted by J Richards on November 05, 2008, 11:47 AM | #

Is Eric Hufschmid a Zionist disinfo agent provocateur?

This question is easy to answer.  A Zio disinfo agent will reveal minor Jewish crimes in order to establish rapport, but he works to protect the Jewish crime network.  Hufschmid focuses on exposing majorJewish crimes and extensively addresses Jewish deception.

Zio disinfo agents usually network with and promote each other, but Hufschmid is basically a lone wolf.

Hufschmid extensively discusses the arguments of many people in the truth movement that are in his estimation phonies, but these assumed phonies either pretend that Hufschmid doesn’t exist or they accuse him of being a Jew, disinfo agent, etc ., without substantiating the charge or if they do, then the arguments tend to be very weak.

What is the verdict?  Read Hufschmid for yourself and his detractors, and then make your decision.  Don’t take my word for it.

Diamed has seen the videos and pictures that show the Holocaust was real

I don’t suppose Diamed means videos of the gassings.  I have seen lots of videos and pictures about the Holocaust, too.  One of these items showed the ovens.  It made me think that I could make a 5-min video showing fluid-filled syringes of various sizes, and then claim that my neighbor killed 5,000 dogs by lethal injection.  I suppose Diamed will believe it.

Another Holocaust video showed smiling SS soldiers at Auschwitz.  The narrator tells us that these sadistic soldiers were having a good time while the Jews were being gassed.  I suppose I could make a video comprising of clips of children crying.  Then I could claim that the children were crying because they had been spanked by leprechauns.  Diamed should believe this too, I think. 

The Holocaust would be impossible to cover up if it were a lie

There’s way too many Holocaust witnesses

Their word is about as credible as that of the millions of fine people from the land of the cognitive elites – witnessing stone statues drinking milk.

McVeigh did the Oklahoma City bombing?

Simple physics tells us the answer (see link in essay).  It is impossible for a truck-based fertilizer bomb to effect the damage sustained by the Alfred P. Murrrah building.

Muslims did 9/11?

There are cameras all over an airport.  Where are the videos showing the 19 ‘Muslim hijackers’ around the boarding areas of the doomed flights?  How come some of these ‘hijackers’ were found alive after they had martyred themselves?  How did the Muslims manage to make NORAD stand down?

The Jews tell us that we have religious fundamentalist Muslims martyring themselves.  The Jews also tell us that some of these Muslims - in good standing with the principles of their faith - took a copy of the Holy Quran to a strip club shortly before 9/11 and then slurped alcohol while ogling naked gyrating white whores, and then they left the Quran in the strip club, perhaps because they were too drunk or maybe because they decided that the Holy Quran will beatify the place.

The Jews tell us that the flight recorders of the hijacked planes were destroyed beyond retrieval, but they found two passports in the wreckage , one at the WTC buildings and another at the Pentagon that belonged to two of the ‘Muslims hijackers.’

Me thinks that the most plausible culprits are the ones leaving the phony trail of evidence. 

Capitalism vs. socialism vs. communism

Where does this come into the picture?  The twin problems – most money being generated out of nothing, and money being issued by bankers that are not accountable to the public – are not related to whether the economy is capitalist, socialist or communist.  I prefer capitalism.

Bankers enrich the world?

Joseph Stiglitz’ 4 –step strategy (privatization, capital market liberalization, market-based pricing and free trade) had such enriching potential that he was honored with a Nobel Prize.  And we are all ingratiated to the bankers for improving the global economy via impoverishment, demolition of property values, savaged industrial production, drained national treasuries, bankruptcies, IMF riots and other goodies. 

David Duke is an honorable man who only goes where the evidence takes him?

The evidence is staring him in the face.  Now let him do the honorable thing.

Duke is given so much air time because of his popularity and convincing arguments?

Is this the reason why they introduce Duke as a former Klansman but not as Rep. David Duke or Dr. David Duke?  What kind of people do Jews give publicity to?  How about these two clowns? 

Am I calling Duke a traitor?

Not at all.  Duke is a traitor if he is voluntarily working for the Jewish crime network, but how do I know if this is true?  I suspect he’s being blackmailed by the Jews.

Posted by Concerned white on November 05, 2008, 12:32 PM | #

I want the White race to survive. I will stop reading foolishness.

Posted by Guessedworker on November 05, 2008, 01:51 PM | #

JR,

There are only two issues with the post.  First, its presentation must be free of the very anti-semitism which delights Jewish ethnic warriors ... gives them a raison d’etre, unites Jewry, keeps white survivalism in the lovingly-prepared “Nazi” locker.

So ... negative emotional expressions are out of bounds as a result.  But it can’t be helped.  Giving succour to those who need anti-semitic displays is simply very bad policy.  This understanding should be a given for everyone who has any claim to seriousness themselves and, more importantly, who wishes the survival of our people to be taken seriously beyond our microcosmic community.

How does one euphemistically refer to parasitic behaviors?  There is nothing honorable about being a parasite.

That’s how you refer to it.

The second issue is that the charge of collaboration can’t be made without damned good cause.  After Hal Turner the collaboration issue is obviously a live one.  But how many of the little band who travelled to Knoxville with Alex and cheered on Hal Turner as he bellowed away about the Klan and a lynching or two knew that they were standing in front of a creature of the Feds and were themselves being used?  That should tell us that we know very little indeed.  We should proceed accordingly, making as sure as possible of our ground.

Incidentally, two truck bombs utterly flattened the US marines’ Beirut Barracks in 1993.

Posted by ben tillman on November 05, 2008, 01:55 PM | #

The evidence is staring him in the face.  Now let him do the honorable thing.

I can’t agree with that.  The evidence of “The Holocaust” is all hearsay evidence to us, and in many respects suspect, but that does not make it false.  Nor, for example, does the absence of films of mass gassings prove no such gassings occurred.

Posted by Revolution Harry on November 05, 2008, 08:56 PM | #

JR, your assessment of the banking system and the ‘false flag’ nature of 9/11 are correct. Quite possibly that of Oaklahoma too. That said I agree with Guessedworker regarding the careful use of language. Not only does it give succour to your opponents but it hampers the development of a broader resistance to those responsible.

Knowledge of and resistance to what can be briefly described as the New World Order is growing daily. That said very few researchers or activists are willing to mention the role that mass immigration, political correctness and concepts such as ‘diversity’ and multiculturism plays. To do so would inevitably trigger the accusations of racism that inspire such great fears in so many. Of all the mind control techniques used none are more powerful than those surrounding race.

To me broadening the base of the resistance is both welcome and necessary if the power of the elites (be they Jew or Gentile, Kabbalist, Jesuit or Mason) is to be broken, which is why a degree of discipline is required.

Posted by Quest on November 05, 2008, 11:49 PM | #

David Duke has 2 great books on the topic. And has done alot for his beliefs. With that said, I think it comes down to David Duke the person. I dont think he is being blackmailed, and I am pretty damn sure he is not a plant. He is soft on the subject, thats all...Always has been. I respect him for much he has done, but there are to many people who take the soft angle like him.
http://eye4knowledge1.wordpress.com/why-the-jews/
More stuff like this and less “its only the Zionist” crap.

Posted by J Richards on November 06, 2008, 03:03 AM | #

Is Jewish success explained by their higher IQs?

Diamed made the point that Jewish success is because of their higher IQs.  This is an important topic because when Jews are confronted with evidence that the leaders of destructive ideologies/intellectual movements are typically Jews, if they don’t dismiss this as anti-Semitism, they say this is because Jews are more intelligent and hence will be overrepresented among the intellectuals, both good and bad.  I am going to address this topic in brief here and in more detail later.

The Ashkenazi have an IQ advantage, but it’s a myth that this is the reason for their success.  Do the math.  Richard Lynn has provided a review of hundreds of IQ studies.  Designating the English or general core European average IQ as 100, with a standard deviation of 15, American and British Ashkenazi have an average IQ of 110, and Israeli Ashkenazi are a smidge over 100, say between 100 and 103 or something like this.  We assume a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 15 for both groups. 

Let us consider the U.S.  We are looking at a little over 5 million Jews and about 195 million whites.  I am just going to use 5 million Jews and 190 million whites, and round off numbers.

Number of American Jews with IQs in the 130 – 200 range = 456,056
Number of American whites with IQs in the 130 -200 range = 4,322,519

You can calculate your own values.

130+ IQs are very high IQs and tend to ensure good success in any academic endeavor and life in general, and we see about 10 times the number of whites than Jews in this range in America.  Among Americans with IQs in the 145-200 range, there are 5 times as many whites as Jews.  Among Americans with IQs in the 160-200 range, there are 3 times as many whites as Jews.  Yet the mainstream media are almost completely owned by Jews, the Central Bank is owned by Jews, Hollywood is owned by Jews, Jews win Nobel Prizes and other accolades in much greater proportion than what the numbers above would suggest, and they are way overrepresented in the Ivy League.  Very high IQ values are not very relevant to the domination of the media and Hollywood as it doesn’t take genius to run them.  Now, some may say that the IQ distributions are not the same, but the most likely explanation is something else.

Go read again Stiglitz’4–step strategy in the essay and dwell on how sick it is.  They gave him a Nobel Prize.  Then read about the plagiarist Einstein .  They gave him a Nobel Prize also.  Any bets that these are not isolated examples but part of a pattern?  Read about the history of banking and the history of the Rothschilds, explaining how the Jews got so much money: criminal parasitic behavior.  Look at how the Jews ended up controlling most of the mainstream media; especially read what they did to Ted Turner.

About 40% of Jewry lives in the U.S. and another 40% in Israel.  If we go beyond the U.S., because the IQ advantage of the Israeli Ashkenazi group over whites is much lower, and we add a considerable number of whites with an average IQ of 100, the global white-Jew discrepancy in the number of people with 130+ IQs increases, but we see Israel with cutting edge military and engineering technology, completely at odds with its mid-90s average IQ.  The Israelis have stolen technology from whites, especially Americans.

So what is the reason for the astounding success of the Ashkenazi Jews?  A satanic brew of high frequencies of criminality, greater ethnocentrism and the sayanim factor.  The role of the IQ advantage is as support for the criminal orientation. 

If Jews were successful primarily because of their higher intelligence, we would be looking at a people more successful at honest living, a people producing things of value for themselves and the world, a people making the world a better place, not a parasitic entity that is creating tremendous global turmoil. This is not to say that Jews have never benefitted others, but the beneficial work of a Jew does not translate to a beneficial effect of his tribe because the impact of a tribe is the sum of the impact of its individuals. 

Note that I am taking the IQ scores from the literature at face value.  I wouldn’t be surprised at all if the Jewish IQ scores are exaggerated, which would serve to make the criminality factor even more important.

The high frequency of criminality among the Jews should not be underestimated.  I now know why a few years ago I would have dismissed the essay I just wrote as manifest craziness.  This is also the reason why Eric Hufschmid would not have believed in most of what he writes today if someone had told him about it 10 years ago.  This also happens to be the same reason why I have had zero success in convincing friends about the people responsible for major global crimes such as the World Wars, 9/11, the Madrid train bombings, the banking swindles, etc., mirroring the experience of Hufschmid.  This reason is that people refuse to believe that any community could be so diabolically evil. 

If we judge Jews by the standards of what we observe among our relatives and extended families, which is reasonable as a first approximation, most of us will outright reject what initially comes across as the laughable ‘Jews did this, Jews did that, Jews did it all’ lunatic conspiracy theory.  But some of us, much to our surprise, eventually realize how astoundingly criminal Jewry is, and if we discuss it with family and friends , then we have to deal with charges of losing our minds, becoming conspiracy nuts and the Jews-did-it-all straw man.  Of course, Jews didn’t do it all, but they have done a lot of it, and mind-bogglingly so in proportion to their numbers.

What this means is that the best hope of convincing the unacquainted is to pick a small number of major Jewish crimes - e.g., 9/11, Holohoax, banking - and provide plenty of supporting evidence.  Convince someone of one major Jewish crime and then we can get this person to start asking questions and be less likely to dismiss some seemingly outrageous ideas right off the bat. 

I think 9/11 is a good candidate for getting people started on the Jewish question because it is a relatively recent event and there are plenty of Jewry-incriminating materials on 9/11 readily accessible to people with an internet connection.  People can see that 9/11 was used as an excuse for invading Afghanistan and then Iraq.  After the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, the opium production there - worth tens of billions of dollars - returned full bloom.  The Afghans are not reaping in the profits.  It does not have to be said which group is making lots of shekels out of the opium sales.  The people can be told about the Haifa oil pipeline and it would be obvious that Israel wants control of Iraqi oil and is using American presence there to secure long-term control of Iraqi oil.  People can see that the Jewish push for attacking Iran is strongly motivated by their desire to control the oil reserves in Iran.  People will understand that 9/11 served the long-term interests of a big crime network.  They will make a reasonable guess that 9/11 wasn’t the first or last crime committed by this network.  They will wonder what other crimes this criminal network has done and what motivates it.  This is when people will be receptive to the numerous instances of Jewish criminality that they would normally dismiss as ridiculous conspiracy theories.  Then it would just be a matter of citing evidence, which is easy to come by.  The hard part is the very first step, preventing people from dismissing the notion as so ludicrous that no brain cells should be wasted on the matter, or else they won’t look at the evidence.

Posted by Dave Johns on November 06, 2008, 03:34 AM | #

Revelation 2:9

I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.

Posted by Diamed on November 06, 2008, 05:51 AM | #

Correct me if I’m wrong, but if you have even a slightly higher average IQ, due to the nature of the bell curve, that gives you a huge edge at the far right end of the curve.  Jews have something like 30 times as many high IQ people as whites per capita, due to the seemingly ‘small’ gap between us.  Since jews make up maybe 2% of the US populace, it’s understandable they’re the majority of people in high-powered positions.

I’ve read Babi-Yar, Life and Fate, Maus I + II, Number the Stars, the Upstairs Room, Anne Frank’s diary, even visited the holocaust memorial they made out of Anne Frank’s living place.  I’ve seen videos of the starved bodies and people moving heaps of corpses to mass graves in the concentration camps, the history channel is full of them.  Endless scholars have written endless scholarly works about the holocaust with reams of citations and footnotes.  There are still today jews who survived the holocaust who stand witness for the mass killings that were done there, it is impossible that every single jew on earth is ‘in on a conspiracy.’ Just look at white back-biting behavior and you’ll see that there’s always plenty of traitors who would leak the real truth out--if it existed.  There are also tons of anti-Israeli jews who would love to compromise the holocaust narrative if it were possible and had somehow been ‘in on the conspiracy.’ The only way to ‘prove’ the holocaust would be to have a time machine and go back and watch it all as an eye witness, but it is one of the most thoroughly documented and witnessed events in history and far more likely than virtually any event in history we take for granted as true.  I see no reason to demand further and further evidence from this one event in history and hold it to a higher and higher standard just because we don’t like the conclusion.

9-11 was clearly done by muslims, because bin Laden has multiple times admitted and even boasted about having done it.  Al Qaeda had been carrying out tons of terrorist attacks before hand, and afterwards carried out many more, why is 9-11 different?  Did Al Qaeda do all the other bombings, the Kenya and Tanzania bombing, the cole bombing, the first WTC bombing--did muslims do the bali bombing, the disco bombing in berlin, the beirut bombing, and then suddenly took a nap while jews hit 9-11, then went back to suicide bombing all over Iraq and Afghanistan?  All the evidence points to Islam having an ax to grind with the US, Al Qaeda committing terrorist attacks against us every chance they get, Al Qaeda claiming credit for it, and then fighting a war with us for the last 7 years--all over a misunderstanding?  They’re innocent and we’ve killed millions of them, but out of stubbornness, they continue to boast and brag they did it and are responsible?  Whatever strange coincidences make 9-11 look suspicious, I suspect if we thoroughly investigated any event we would find just as many strange and seemingly inexplicable coincidences.  The only reason we are so doubtful of 9-11 is because it was so big and studied so closely, just like turning stars into constellations and clouds into shapes, truthers are taking patterns that aren’t there and forcing them on the natural world to try and explain coincidences or biases, but that doesn’t make it true.  I’m even willing to entertain the notion that Israel knew beforehand but kept silent, knowing this would strengthen America’s foreign policy favoritism towards them, but that’s as far as rationality can go.

The OK city bombing probably had more accomplices than we caught, but McVeigh confessed to it, we have all sorts of video camera evidence, and so on.  His motive is understandable and clear, he was tired of the government abuses of power targeting white radicals and so struck back.  There is no reason to believe Jews somehow framed him for it, or any other nonsense when the facts at hand like who rented the truck, video tape evidence, terry nichols’ eye witness testimony, and so on all say the simple facts!

Banks make money not by ‘swindling,’ but by investing.  Someone wants to start a business, all he needs is a loan and he can start making big profits on his big idea.  Then he pays a percentage of his profits back to the bank and everyone benefits.  He got enough money to start his business, his investors got more money than they started with by deferring their consumption and letting someone else put it to a more productive use, and banks were rewarded for connecting the two parties and making the deal happen.  By matching capital to merit, banks increase our productivity, moving money to its best and highest use is the way investors, bankers, and middlemen enrich the economy.  When money is misallocated (like for instance by the government requiring home loans to insolvent minorities) (or people think the internet will make far more money than it reasonably could) you have bubbles and crashes, which allows for money to be reallocated to a more realistic best and highest use.  It’s just capitalism in action.  By use of banks, the stock market, and capitalism we’ve increased our wealth from bare subsistence farming to $43k a year on average king-like living.

Posted by Matra on November 06, 2008, 06:01 AM | #

Desmond Jones,

Nazism has never been a part of my heritage nor yours as an Anglo-Saxon Canadian. Walk around any white Canadian neighbourhood this Remembrance week and count the poppies you see. Telling us non-Germans to be virtuous white men who don’t forsake our ancestors (as you put it) by embracing a foreign 1920-30s ideology is nonsensical.  You might as well tell modern day Anglicised Slavs in Pennsylvania to embrace the 19th century Russian Slavophile ideal as it would be just as relevant an historical experience to them as Nazism ever was to Anglo-North America.  Even those non-German nations that collaborated with the Germans were mostly motivated by local ethno-nationalist concerns (eg. Croats sticking it to rival Serbs) rather than an interest in Nazi ideology.

Canada, like most of the West, was white “supremacist” before Nazism existed and was still white “supremacist” for years after Hitler’s death. Most of the West only went down the road to multiculturalism equating self-preservation with Nazism after the “Americans” consolidated their cultural hegemony over the Western world. Under the Northern Ireland (British) school system as late as the second half of the 1970s I was taught about WW2 but never even heard of the “Holocaust” or anything about Jews having any part of the war until I left NI and was exposed to Hollywood.

(If any Brits who attended school prior to the 1980s, when American influence became all dominant, are reading this I’d be curious to know if your WW2 lessons, like mine, were patriotic and completely free of anti-racism and the Holocaust).

When non-Germans agree that white preservation=Nazism they accept the political narrative of their enemies.

Posted by J Richards on November 06, 2008, 06:54 AM | #

Is Jewish success explained by their higher IQs? Part 2

Correct me if I’m wrong, but if you have even a slightly higher average IQ, due to the nature of the bell curve, that gives you a huge edge at the far right end of the curve.

Correct, but if you do the math, the numbers don’t even come remotely close to supporting your claim.

Jews have something like 30 times as many high IQ people as whites per capita

I gave you a link to a normal distribution probabilities calculator so you can see how ridiculous your argument is.  The IQ range for which there are 30 times more American Jews per capita than American whites per capita is approximately 180-200.  In a population of 5 million American Jews, there will be about 8 Jews in the 180-200 IQ range.  Now don’t tell me that at least one Jew owner of each of the Federal Reserve, major TV network and major book publisher is one of these super-gifted Jews, but if you insist, there will be about 9 white Americans with an IQ in the 180-200 range.  So why isn’t there a 50-50 split at the very top?

It is mathematically impossible to justify Jewish success as a function of their intelligence, period.  The only logical answer is their criminality.

I will be responding to your other arguments over the next couple of days.

Posted by Desmond Jones on November 06, 2008, 08:20 AM | #

Nazism has never been a part of my heritage nor yours as an Anglo-Saxon Canadian.

No one said it was. However Calvin posited the Nazis and the Klan as equivalents. And the Klan definitely was a part of Canada’s history, even more so in the West. Canada didn’t embrace white supremacy, it embraced Anglo-Saxon supremacy. Part of the reason the Klan’s legacy in Ontario was short lived was because it was American in origin and America, after the mass migration of eastern and southern Europeans, was no longer seen as an Anglo-Saxon nation by imperialist, Orange WASP Ontario. It’s a tad tiresome having Brits repeatedly telling us lowly Canucks what our history is and who is virtuous.

The Klan, the Nazis, the Founders, it makes no difference to those who, as the Narrator so eloquently says, “stands unaccosted in the village square shouting endless profanities and slanders against (my) forefathers”. If nothing else, they cannot take the pride we hold for those who came before us.

Posted by Guessedworker on November 06, 2008, 08:45 AM | #

Matra: If any Brits who attended school prior to the 1980s, when American influence became all dominant, are reading this I’d be curious to know if your WW2 lessons, like mine, were patriotic and completely free of anti-racism and the Holocaust

I was stuck in school during the 50s and 60s, and there were no lessons on the history of WW2.  It still belonged too much to life experience to find its way into the curriculum.  The first time I heard of “the Holocaust” in connection with WW2 was, I think, during the early-mid 70s.  The first Hollywood production I saw on the subject was the mini-series of Herman Wouk’s Winds of War, and that would have been in the early 80s, I guess.  There may have been earlier ones but TV watching was never high on my interests.

Anti-racism I first heard of in the late 1980s, as a very unpleasant and revolutionary idea from American academia.

JR: It is mathematically impossible to justify Jewish success as a function of their intelligence, period.  The only logical answer is their criminality.

I think you need to tease out the meaning of “criminal” here.  Talmudic tradition stipulates behaviours in money-lending and in the conduct of business affairs, and while these might be termed discriptively as criminal they don’t, of course, meet the requirements of the term under law.  How much Jewish success in all fields of acquisition is a consequence of their traditional practices?  How much is a consequence of the widely-observed materialism, graspingness and commercial ruthlessness of Jews?  How much is a consequence of ethnic nepotism, in all its forms?  How much really qualifies under a legal definition as criminal?

This brings us back to language and the problem of being heard.  If one applies “criminal” too generally to Jewish success, without care for the possibly quite subtle distinctions it really contains, one will be dismissed.  The subject will go unexplored, and any real criminality that one might point out will get a pass.

Posted by Darren on November 06, 2008, 12:11 PM | #

Diamed:

I’ve seen videos of the starved bodies and people moving heaps of corpses to mass graves in the concentration camps, the history channel is full of them.

This is circumstantial evidence. This does not prove the six million claim, nor does it prove the methods of execution, the medical experiments, etc.

A possible explanation that is often said is that the allied bombing of supply lines left these camps without food and without medical supplies, allowing hunger and disease to spread.

Endless scholars have written endless scholarly works about the holocaust with reams of citations and footnotes.

Again, the current legal and cultural regime punishes anyone who tries to research anything that comes to a contrarian conclusion.

I’m not a historian and I cannot sit here and debunk every quote and reference you want to throw at me, but at least read some of the revisionist material out there. The stuff on http://www.onethirdoftheholocaust.com is a good start.

My impression is that the pro-holocaust material out there is actually very limited and the writings we see only reference a very small handful of source material.

There are still today jews who survived the holocaust who stand witness for the mass killings that were done there, it is impossible that every single jew on earth is ‘in on a conspiracy.

They don’t have to be - they only need to have a common ethnic interest in not wanting to see their fellow Jews be deported en masse - which they do. That is sufficent enough motivation, in my mind, to suggest that they would embellish the truth to support their ends.

Why do you think blatantly false rumors - rumors that persist to this day - about things like human soap and lampshades that have been debunked are still repeated by some of them?

There are also tons of anti-Israeli jews who would love to compromise the holocaust narrative if it were possible and had somehow been ‘in on the conspiracy.’

Really? Who are they? I am not aware of any anti-holocaust Jews who have tried to join the revisionist side.

but it is one of the most thoroughly documented and witnessed events in history and far more likely than virtually any event in history we take for granted as true.

To say this smacks of utter ignorance and shows you have done about zero research. The holocaust lacks evidence and is rife with contradictory claims about what happened there.

I see no reason to demand further and further evidence from this one event in history and hold it to a higher and higher standard just because we don’t like the conclusion.

I do. I demand that the holocaust is allowed to be researched objectively and fairly without reprisal for people who come to conclusions that deviate from the moral standard.

How can you in this day and age of denial laws say that the standard of research applied to the holocaust is sufficent?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 06, 2008, 12:22 PM | #

JR is correct that the degree of Jewish dominance we all see cannot be explained by Jewish IQ.  It’s the result of Jewish IQ plus Jewish nepotism (a huge factor) plus other Jewish traits such as audacity and so forth.  Superior Jewish IQ alone does not account for it.

Posted by Darren on November 06, 2008, 12:23 PM | #

Diamed:

Your basic argument about investment banking is not incorrect in my view. The major criticisms that some of us have has to do with the behavior of some of the people who participate in it - near the top.

It can be easily shown that there are people out there who amass wealth and seek to amass more wealth at the expense of culture and society. International bankers also seem to have an interest in having the world join these economic collectives at the expense of national autonomy.

Of course, this leads to arguments that capitalism breeds this corruption and bad behavior by the free-wheeling nature of the system. This is why people propose alternative systems - on our side we have things like corporate fascism and national socialism that attempted to deal with these issues.

I think if you’re going to stick to the idea that there are not corrupt capitalists who are out to destroy nations and have them join whatever social project they want to see them join, you are deluded.

Posted by Darren on November 06, 2008, 12:26 PM | #

JR is correct that the degree of Jewish dominance we all see cannot be explained by Jewish IQ.  It’s the result of Jewish IQ plus Jewish nepotism (a huge factor) plus other Jewish traits such as audacity and so forth.  Superior Jewish IQ alone does not account for it. (Scrooby)

Agreed. Otherwise we would see East Asians, who average something like an IQ of 107, which is about halfway between the White norm and the Ashkenazi norm have a degree of success and power somewhere in the middle of us and Ashkenazis.

They don’t.

Posted by