7) Insurance burden: all those lawsuits lead to increased costs passed on to businesses and consumers.

We discuss “white privilege” in the context of its being a slur against all the diverse white American men and women in our on-line syllabus.

To see how we analyze the slur qua slur, go to:  http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/slurs9.htm
and scroll down to “white privilege.”

To see two examples of how we record an attack on writers and editors who use “white privilege” as thought it is a competent category of discourse, go to:  http://www.resistingdefamation.org/sub/g41.htm

“Instead of debunking “White privilege” I would encourage Whites to eschew masochism and embrace it and let the muds take the hindmost.”

THE PROBLEM IS WHITES EMBRACE MASOCHISM!!!!!!!!

“Here’s an example of “White Privilege” for you.”—GT

That is an example of whites embracing masochism! Whites are too dense to get it!!!

Svi,

JR has a re-design upcoming that will, we expect, overcome the software issue with IE.  A number of other little things will be fixed, but EE trades big advantages against some disadvantages, and we can’t entirely ameliorate the latter.

My apologies.

The white elite and “me-tooing” middle-class aren’t masochists. They’ve happily dumped on hillbillies, peckerwoods, and white trash from the git-go.  Were White trash ever beneficiaries of positive blow black from the power structure?  Not when nigs were slaves and certainly not by the antebellum version of Homo Economicus.  Slaves were treated better and knew it.  The white elite changed sides to preserve status.  Poor Whites, on the other hand, are what they’ve always been: Trash.  Consultants selling white privilege are usually “white” jews and sycophants wearing expensive suits and driving nice automobiles.

“The white elite and “me-tooing” middle-class aren’t masochists.”

YES THEY ARE!!! Reality dictates! Haven’t you been out to the corner bar lately?

“But time is quickly running out.  Hopefully we can wake our people up before the real struggle begins.” —captainchaos

That would have been relevant in the 1960’s. We are done...stick a fork in it! Whites have earned their reputation as the most masochistic people on the planet. Other races are taking advantage of it.......

S. Igorevich,

Just Google “white trash,” “poor white trash,” “white slavery,” “white slaves,” redneck, peckerwood, etc.  The information is out there.

Be advised that multiracialists, in what is clearly a political attempt to defuse the significance of white slavery, are saying that all or most white slaves were “mulattos” fathered by plantation owners.  By 1865, no doubt many were mixed.  Nevertheless, there is growing documentation of the early history of white slavery in North America, and those slaves were not mulattos.

“As an epithet, white trash, or the more extended poor white trash first came into common use in the 1830’s. The Oxford English Dictionary identifies white trash in its earliest usage as an American pejorative used by the slaves of gentlemen against poor whites who worked in the field. The real distinction is that while a black man might be slave, to be a house slave was better than any menial job, even if that job was held by a white person.”

http://kpearson.faculty.tcnj.edu/Dictionary/white_trash.htm

Read what Harriet Beecher Stowe had to say about slavery’s effect on “poor white trash”:

But it will appear that the institution of slavery has produced not only heathenish degraded miserable slaves but it produces a class of white people who are by universal admission more heathenish, degraded, and miserable. The institution of slavery has accomplished the double feat, in America, not only of degrading and brutalizing her black working classes, but of producing, notwithstanding a fertile soil and abundant room, a poor white population as degraded and brutal as ever existed in any of the most crowded districts of Europe

http://preview.tinyurl.com/25yct6
http://tinyurl.com/25yct6

“Onlooker, are you trying to confirm your hypothesis with your own behavior? “

White people are absolute idiots.  Can you disagree? CAN YOU DISAGREE??? We built modern civilization yet we gave it away to the primitives. How smart is that? Please tell me why giving everything white people invented to everyone else is beneficial to us?

B. Hussein Obama is a nigger. No question about it!

I have taken up blogging lately about “Jewish privilege.”

The forgotten history of Britain’s white slaves
Dominic Sandbrook reviews White Cargo: the Forgotten History of Britain’s White Slaves in America by Don Jordan and Michael Walsh
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/05/03/bojor28.xml

http://www.heretical.com/British/slavery.html

London’s ‘white slaves’
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/04/05/nslaves05.xml

Excerpts from Michael Hoffman’s TWWATWS, here:
http://www.truthslavery.freeuk.com/

I’d locate and quote the primary sources instead of Hoffman’s book or the NatAll article.

The White Privilege calumny only works for those ignorant enough to believe the postulating parasites of that sacred race which promotes, and inwardly (and laughingly) discounts, Racial Egalitarianism. Hi there Jesus.

(not responding to other posts because I haven’t digested them yet)

I suppose Svigor or anyone else who experienced this problem probably has a large/high resolution monitor if it is not a visual acuity problem.

Actually it’s both. 

Anyway, the problem is fixed.

Excellent!  I pointed out both problems way back in another thread - I wish now I’d been a squeakier wheel as I assumed the problem was known and hard or impossible to fix.

People who need to turn off images so that they can surf faster on dial up internet should get broadband; it is high time!

Heh, tell the local telcos and cable companies!  I live in an area with only satellite access, and I’m not paying the up front costs just to get inferior broadband at higher prices.

To help these individuals, the images posted in the articles, the comments, and the captcha are surrounded by a one pixel black border, making it easy to tell where the images are.

Great, thanks again.

Svigor has an important project before us.  When completed, a link to it should be posted prominently.

My guess is you’re the guy to help us get the resultant final page high search rankings.

To appear less biased, one should acknowledge outcomes where whites are better off than many non-white groups, such as wealth, but not something like looks, which will be dismissed as racist or subjective.

I was thinking the same thing.

And yes, thank G-d for the Internet.  It’s hard to impossible to step back and notice its effects, but they’re there; I think recent examples like Ferraro, Muller, the reaction to (the Jewish) Ms. Burk, etc., wouldn’t exist otherwise.

I wouldn’t count on the Internet for more than another decade and that’s probably a stretch.

The historical nature of the accusation must be addressed. The heart of the matter was and remains white homo economicus.  I understand that addressing the accusation from this angle steps on toes, but slaves were property and treated as well or better than poor white trash.  Kidnapped Londoners brought to the Americas and Australia were neither mulatto nor the beneficiaries of privilege from the monarchy.  Poor white trash were not the beneficiaries of any form of reflected privilege from homo economicus until after 1865 and that only to the extent it helped economicus to regain power in the South. 

Plantation owners did enjoy sex with White and mulatto slave women. They did not create the mulatto, however.  African females were not brought to America in numbers near proportional to that of African males until the mid- to late-1700s.  Kidnapped English females brought to America and forced to live and work as slaves among the male African chattel brought the mulatto into existence.

Traditionally, American slaveholders preferred to employ men in agricultural labor.  This dovetailed perfectly with the needs of West African tribal leaders who sold men to the white devils to minimize sexual competition and maintain their labor force.  Between 1790 and 1860 the Southern slave population exploded.  How to account for this explosion when Southern state legislatures began banning the importation of slaves from the 1780s on?  To some extent state laws were ignored, but this resulted in the U.S. banning of slave importation in 1808 and was followed by heavy patrolling of the African coast to enforce the ban. Thus slavers ignoring state laws do not account for the explosion in the slave population after 1810 and likely had little effect before that time.  Neither did the African manimal awaken one day in 1810 to discover “muh dik.” The fact is from the latter half of 17th century onward slavery’s demise was on the horizon and much of this of this was due to the kidnapping, enslavement, and transporting of poor Englishmen to the Empire’s fringes.  The antebellum Homo Economicus, slaver and slaveholder alike, was perfectly aware of this fact.  That is why from 1750 to 1790 the importation of African females rose sharply and resulted in a dramatic increase in the American slave population from 1790 to 1860.

White concern for Whites was the original motivation behind ending slavery to Homo Economicus.  Contrast this with the Africans.

The “one drop” rule’s contribution to maintaining American European homogeneity is indisputable.  However, the original motivation behind the rule was antebellum Homo Economicus’ desire to maintain and enlarge the slave base, not to maintain White purity.  There were few, if any, consequences for impregnating White and mulatto slave girls, who were highly valued over African women for obvious reasons. Thus partus may have had a sexual motivation as well.  White H.E.s have always placed dollars first and poor kinfolk, tribesmen, and race dead last.  Always.  Look today to their sycophantic, but extremely lucrative positions in government, business, and academia.  The reward for verbalizing a generic racial “masochism” but crapping especially hard on “poor white trash” is 4800 sq. ft and a swimming pool in the hills.  Some masochism!

“by other African slaves, slaveholders, and various clientele down the line.”

We built modern civilization yet we gave it away to the primitives. How smart is that? Please tell me why giving everything white people invented to everyone else is beneficial to us?

We did not build Western Civilization. Our ancestors built it. We are destroying it.

GT,

You are using masochism in an incorrect manner.  Masochists derive pleasure from self-suffering.  The HMs are deriving pleasure from pampering themselves, and they care not whether this comes at the expense of their racial brethren.  The descriptor you are looking for is “selfish, venal, racially apathetic individuals,” not masochists.

Who is including poor whites among privileged whites?  Poor whites are generally ignored in discussions justifying white privilege, and when pressed, their poverty and hardship will be blamed on exploitation by other whites, not non-whites. 

I didn’t imply that all poor whites are “mentally ill, physically unattractive, or of low IQ.” I described some low status conditions.  I should have used status instead of class.

Between 1790 and 1860 the Southern slave population exploded.  How to account for this explosion when Southern state legislatures began banning the importation of slaves from the 1780s on?

You’re not going to mention the invention of the cotton gin circa 1793?

Between 1790 and 1860 the Southern slave population exploded.  How to account for this explosion when Southern state legislatures began banning the importation of slaves from the 1780s on?

You’re not going to mention the invention of the cotton gin circa 1793?

Posted by ben tillman on Friday, March 14, 2008 at 10:36 PM | #

Do you mean the technological advancement that made obsolete farm equipment of the slaves?  That would certainly open a different spin on the matter.

In case it still isn’t clear:

Homo Economicus is not masochistic and I ridicule the notion that he is.

In case it still isn’t clear:

Homo Economicus is not masochistic and I ridicule the notion that he is.

Posted by GT on Saturday, March 15, 2008 at 01:31 AM | #

Is he then sadistic?

It is one of history’s great riddles, perhaps its greatest: why has our race turned against itself?

To reprise James Bowery’s first comment at this site, “It’s the Jews”. 

From MacDonald:

http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/archives/vol2no2/km-unique.html

This suggests the fascinating possibility that the key for a group intending to turn Europeans against themselves is to trigger their strong tendency toward altruistic punishment by convincing them of the moral blameworthiness of their own people.  Because Europeans are individualists at heart, they readily rise up in moral anger against their own people once they are seen as free riders and therefore morally blameworthy—a manifestation of their stronger tendency toward altruistic punishment....

Thus the current altruistic punishment so characteristic of contemporary Western civilization: Once Europeans were convinced that their own people were morally bankrupt, any and all means of punishment should be used against their own people.  Rather than see other Europeans as part of an encompassing ethnic and tribal community, fellow Europeans were seen as morally blameworthy and the appropriate target of altruistic punishment.  For Westerners, morality is individualistic—violations of communal norms by free riders are punished by altruistic aggression.

[...]

The best strategy to destroy Europeans, therefore, is to convince the Europeans of their own moral bankruptcy.  A major theme of my book, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, is that this is exactly what Jewish intellectual movements have done.  They have presented Judaism as morally superior to European civilization and European civilization as morally bankrupt and the proper target of altruistic punishment.  The consequence is that once Europeans are convinced of their own moral depravity, they will destroy their own people in a fit of altruistic punishment.  The general dismantling of the culture of the West, and eventually its demise as anything resembling an ethnic entity, will occur as a result of a moral onslaught triggering a paroxysm of altruistic punishment.  And thus the intense effort among Jewish intellectuals to continue the ideology of the moral superiority of Judaism and its role as undeserving historical victim while at the same time continuing the onslaught on the moral legitimacy of the West.

Homo Economicus (Maguire calls him Homo Monetarus) is individualistic, to the extent that it pays well. So-called “ethno-masochism” pays better than individualism, thank you, and there really isn’t any self-denial (masochism) involved in giving lip service to (repeating or amplifying) jewish hatred because denial and pain are easily transferred to the weakest members of his tribe. 

Homo Economicus is a rational sensualist. He is not a libertine – not outwardly, at least.  His morality is consistently dual toward members of his tribe. Erase the concept of tribe – create a multi-tribal society, for example – and his treatment of the tribe’s weakest members worsens.  His altruism is never extended to the tribe’s lowest members, except as an expedient pose.  In fact, one might say that Homo Economicus derives a certain amount of pleasure from mistreating his tribe’s weakest members.  Upper class, a dual morality toward tribesmen, and guilt transference to the tribe’s weakest members are essential to identifying and tracking H.E.’s historical movements.

So far I have written many articles describing the “whites as cancer” myth, but I have not yet put forth any theory to explain why it has been so attractive to Westerners.

What MacDonald is describing above is immune-system inversion, so it makes perfect sense for a disease (cancer) metaphor to gain purchase.  It can’t be repeated too often that the function of the immune system is self/non-self discrimination for the purpose of protecting self from non-self.  In an inverted immune system, such as that of white societies, self/non-self discrimination is performed for the purpose of benefitting non-self at the expense of self.

Here’s a metaphor:  HEs are a self-sabotaging part of the immune system.

They did not create the mulatto, however.

There are plenty of lighter negroes about in Africa. The Fulani are everywhere in northern Africa; a few thousand of them could serve to give the illusion of a mixed society, as in certain areas of Brazil. Doesn’t Coon give a very detailed account of African genetic history somewhere?

Intro page to Racetraitor.org revised:

In a multiracial society the concept of “white privilege” is an a-historical moral construct used by the white upper-classes to maintain sociopolitical supremacy relative to the White underclass by the transference of moral culpability for past and present transgressions and through the formation of interracial, interclass, and cross-sexual alliances.  Its most wretched members share a status higher, in all respects, than that of the most worthy persons excluded from it, in return for which they give their support to a system that elevates them. 

The key to solving the political division within the white race is to abolish the social supremacy of the white upper-class and its allies, which means no more and no less than abolishing the elevated moral status that is assigned to membership in the upper-class. Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive, because class influence permeates every issue, domestic and foreign, in US society.

The continued existence of the white upperclass in a multiracial society depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place class, ethnic, religious, and other interests above their racial interests. The defection of enough of its members to make it unreliable as a predictor of behavior will lead to sociopolitical cohesion within the White race.

H. Monetarus

Race: Europid.

Class: Wealthy/Upper Middle-Class.

Morality: Dual, Private and Public.

In-group:

1.  Class- and Race-based.
2.  Religion/ethnicity/race incidental to interclass economic and political alliances.

Out-group: Consistently Europid.

Politics:

1.  Monetarist.
2.  Equates money with wealth and regards them as coeval.
3.  Equates monetary returns with productivity.
4.  Religion/ethnicity/race incidental to political and economic alliances.
5.  Noblesse oblige extended to less privileged members of allied groups.
6.  Underclass Europids scapegoated to justify out-Europid alliances.

Okay, Ben, let’s use the non-metaphor metaphorically:

H. Economicus (or Monetarus) welcomes the invader into the body and suppresses the immune system’s efforts to drive him out.

From a monetary perspective slavery was nothing more than a labor system, and a rather inefficient one at that.  Since its abolishment we’ve seen the importation of impoverished eastern Europeans along with mud from the third-world as inexpensive “free labor” replacements for slaves.

From a historical standpoint H. Monetarus is the real race traitor. His position relative to the White underclass has been propped by white economic servants (both conscious and unconscious of their status), useful white idiots (both educated and uneducated), and interracial/interethnic/cross-sexual allies who gain at the expense of the White underclasses.

From an historical standpoint H. Monetarus is the real race traitor. His position relative to the White underclass has been propped by white economic servants (both conscious and unconscious of their status), useful white idiots (both educated and uneducated), and interracial/interethnic/cross-sexual allies who gain at the expense of the White underclasses.

Due to the nature of the system we are all monetarists to various degrees.  The differences between H. Monetarus and us are (or should be):

1.  We do not regard wealth and money as coeval.
2.  We do not regard monetary returns and productivity as coeval.
3.  We do not abuse, exploit, or scapegoat underclass Europids to justify or perpetuate class distinctions.  Only individual behavior may be criticized.
4.  We do not scapegoat underclass Europids to justify and perpetuate out-Europid alliances.
5.  Oblige is never extended to out-Europids at the expense of our underclass.
6.  Race is primary to all other considerations.
7.  Our Race Is Our Nation.

Given the reality of monetarism and the fact that the greatest obstacle to rejecting the jew comes from members of our own Race:

1.  We must develop and deliver a comprehensive moral attack upon H. Monetarus in which jews are incidental but not ignored.  Svigor’s attention to the concept of “white privilege” is an important part of this work.  Michael Hoffman should be credited with blowing open the lid on White slavery.
2.  We must strive to liberate ourselves from monetarism by politically advancing the cause of free association at local levels and building alternate, collaborating communities, industries, institutions and economies in select rural and suburban locations.

In this way we empower the White underclass of targeted regions and build a flexible, competing social, economic, and political confederation.

Or, we can sit on our asses and wait for the Revolution that has been “just around the corner” for the past 50 years.

H. Monetarus

Race: Europid.

Class: Wealthy/Upper Middle-Class.

Morality: Dual, Private and Public.

In-group:

1.  Class- and Race-based.
2.  Religion/ethnicity/race incidental to interclass economic and political alliances.

Out-group: Consistently Europid.

Politics:

1.  Monetarist.
2.  Equates money with wealth and regards them as coeval.
3.  Equates monetary returns with productivity.
4.  Religion/ethnicity/race incidental to political and economic alliances.
5.  Noblesse oblige extended to less privileged members of allied groups.
6.  Underclass Europids scapegoated to justify out-Europid alliances.

Posted by GT on Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 02:30 PM

A lot of good points GT.  Yes, all too many of the West European elites who at one time had been taking part in and profiting from the ghastly Trans-Atlantic [chattel] slave trade, either as dealers or consumers, at their own peoples’ great expense, simply went over to the far more lucrative (and exponentially socially destructive) variant of slavery called euphamistically ‘cheap labor’, typically acquired by way of ‘mass immigration’.  Historically this transition from one variant of slavery (chattel) to another (cheap labor) has been called ‘Abolition’.  A big part of the far greater profitability of ‘cheap labor’ over chattel is that the slaver no longer has to pay and deal with the hassle of the overhead cost of cradle to grave care for the slave that he once did, that cost and trouble in practice being largely dumped on the overall non-slaving society to pay for...the slavers only concern being the value of the stolen labor they are systematically stealing which hour after hour, day after day, month after month, and year year, can really add up.  With cheap (aka ‘free’) labor, whether the ‘immigrant’ makes it or not after they’ve been used (up) by the slaver in this way is of no concern to them, they will simply get themselves another one, and hence the almost near continuous promotion of mass immigration.  The beauty of this for those engaging in this modern day slavery and its trade is that ‘divide and conquer’, ‘divide and rule’ is built automatically into it.  Any potential problems from anyone, and these slavers have no qualms about pitting the cheap laborers (whom they are exploiting) against their own [slaver’s] people, something that when the matter is studied regarding the US they’ve been doing going on easily 200 years.

Bottom line, those who once promoted and profited from the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and those today who promote the ideology of cheap labor/institutionalized division (aka Multi-Culturalism)....they are the same.

Below is a pretty good summation of things from the 1907 forward of the book The War-Time Journal of a Georgia Girl, 1864-1865.  I don’t know about you, but while it is taught that the Southern soldier, despite what he might have sincerely thought, was ultimately fighting for chattel slavery, which is correct, I don’t recall anything like the below being taught as regarding the North and what it was fighting for, or for that matter being told anything about such calculations as the former US Treasurer and slave speculator Robert Walker made, effectively determining that cheap labor acquired by mass immigration was four times more profitable than chattel slavery.

Are they perhaps afraid, even if somewhat unconsciously, that people might realize the 19th century ‘abolition’ of slavery was a fraud, the lie of the millenium, and that the scourge of slavery, now metastisized in the form of cheap labor, and sans the former ‘overhead’ costs the slavers used to have to pay, but which they in practice have now largely dumped on the overall non-slaving society to pay, is still very much with us in a much more profitable, virulent, and ultimately exponentially socially destructive form?

Of course this all comes together when one realizes that in the 18th century, and prior to the 1776 Revolution, what would be the United States was a major hub of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, dominated by the British Empire, and of which the North American colonies were a part.  All too many elites in North America were taking part in this trade, in the South these persons tending towards being consumers of slaves, ie slave owners, and in the North, due to environment, the elites tending towards being procuring and selling, ie slave dealers.

‘Our Southern States, being still in the agricultural stage, on account of our practical monopoly of the world’s chief textile staple, were the last of the great civilized nations to find chattel slavery less profitable than wage slavery,* and hence the “great moral crusade” of the North against the perverse and unregenerate South. It was a pure case of economic determinism, which means that our great moral conflict reduces itself, in the last analysis, to a question of dollars and cents, though the real issue was so obscured by other considerations that we of the South honestly believe to this day that we were fighting for States Rights, while the North is equally honest in the conviction that it was engaged in a magnanimous struggle to free the slave.’

In the year 2004 alone the United States imported three million cheap laborers by way of a purposely uncontrolled southern border, more than any other country on the face of the earth, and sixty times the number** transported every year at the heighth of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade in the late 18th and early 19th centuries by the British Empire, which at the time dominated the global trade in slaves.

* ie. ‘cheap labor’
** 50,000 persons a year

Alex, I have found the elaborations of the cheap-labor/forced-race-replacement nexus which you’ve been posting now for several months as isolated thread comments extremely enlightening.  Everyone concerned about the present crisis of forced race-replacement should read them carefully.  We’ve all known right along that the drive by capital to assure an uninterrupted supply of cheap labor has been one of the major forces pushing modern-day race-replacement of whites with Negroes, Hindus, Mexicans, and so on (notice, in fact, that capital is in the process of phasing out the U.S. Negro and race-replacing him with the Mexican mestizo) but never have I read explanations of such stark conciseness as yours. 

1) Could you post links to all of your comments in this “series” posted over the past several months?  I don’t know how to find all thead comments posted by a given commenter, and I’d love to go back and closely study every one of yours in this series, but regrettably have not kept links (I’ve now got the four above safely stored away but none of the others);

2) Would it be possible for you to post a log entry, or series of them, presenting a full elaboration of what your individual posts have striven to make us aware of in these matters?  I’ve love to read such an entry or formal series.  These isolated thread comments you’ve posted here and there are good enough that they well deserve to be gathered into one coherent whole posted as a formal entry (or, if too long, a series of formal entries) for easier study and reference.

Thanks, Scrooby!  I’m a bit flattered.  I don’t mind at all posting links to the threads you’ve mentioned.  And you’re correct about how the Blacks are being discarded and replaced for the cheaper labor the Hispanics might provide.

(1) Starting near the top of the page with the date and time Friday, December 14, 2007 at 03:56 AM

The Lisbon signing and immigration control

(2) A small group of posts starting at about a fifth down the page with the date and time of Monday, December 24, 2007 at 01:53 AM and on the second page a single post about a fifth of the way down the page at Tuesday, January 1, 2008 at 11:03 PM

Utopian idealists against the nation and the people

(3) Starting at about three quarters down the page with the date and time of...Tuesday, November 27, 2007 at 03:45 PM

‘The Death of a multi-racialist

(4) Starting about a fifth down the page with the date of Saturday, December 1, 2007 at 10:46 PM...and then skipping to about the halfway down point of the page at Tuesday, December 4, 2007 at 09:03 AM

“Hey Popopoyotl, about your job …”

H. Economicus (or Monetarus) welcomes the invader into the body and suppresses the immune system’s efforts to drive him out.

I can essentially agree with that, as far as it goes.

I can essentially agree with that, as far as it goes.

Okay, Ben. I’m sorry for treating you roughly.

Wow, I leave for a week and you guys post dissertations!

I’m working on the essay again today but I think I’ll hold off on rushing it out the door as I originally planned.

Thanks for all the comments, lots more to digest.

Racial Competition for Resources? No, the Blacks won that Competition.

White Americans do not seem to be aware of their second class economic status that is steadily evolving. Neither are they aware that the violence and threat of violence by Africans in this country that is also growing as a correlate of economic discrimination against whites. Globalization has intensified the competition for resources: “Climate change will increase the scarcity of resources, be it habitable land or drinkable water, amid the already existing shortage of fossil energy such as oil. A precise measure of increasing resource scarcity is increasing prices. In America however there is strong evidence that the increase in oil prices is simply a device by the oil companies to gouge the white working and middle class. According to the theory”

“Genocide and competition over resources are definitely related and my fear is that the 21st century, turn out to be the century of genocides. “The africans and their Marxist allies are already calling for white genocide.

The possibility of genocide being caused by afro-Marxist racism, globalization, climate change and competition for scarce resources will be one of the focal areas of the future. Already it appears that it really is illegal to be white.

In America there is no true competition. Whites are taxed by government agencies and falsely inflated prices are forced upon them by Marxist capitalists. That money is redistributed to black parasites and rich corporate robber barons. With our taxes an African parasite class is financed. That class enjoys higher educational, employment and other areas of privilege for racist reasons. Many ask: How can a minority that does not work hard and is not as smart as the majority win the battle for scarce resources? Race traitors and 6,000 black interest groups in constant dynamic fluctuation, not only extract tribute from whites but increase their power continually. Now they are about to take over the control of the USA strictly because of their racist privilege.

The Fatal Weakness of Whites

I want to participate in a pro-white advocacy group. I have had enough political experience to know that the masses of white people crave a representative body that affords them a political say. They want a vehicle for nonviolent political struggle against the advocates of white genocide, total black racist cultural domination and marxist totalitarianism-racism.

I have also studied the racial right looking for signs that there are people there who believe in organizing. I have strong evidence that the dominant political expressions in so-called white nationalist forums and groups is controlled by a cabal of people who are totally against white political organization that identifies with the white masses. Why is that you may wonder? In graduate school I took a lot of courses in political psychology, Machiavellianism, and the measurement of content by analyzing verbal and written material. That skill was refined when I graduated from the US Army Psychological Operations Center before it became a bastion of pro-Islam/leftist political correctness.

I have found that all the main white nationals groups and forums have been infiltrated by groups who are posing as “moderate pro-whites.” They preach a number of dysfunctional principles that have worked to totally prevent any mainstream white political expression from their side of the fence. Who are these so-called liberal pro-whites?

First of all they always adopt a harsh sounding name and a nazi or fascist symbol from World War I. Several are known as “Aryan Spear” of the “sword of Thor” or “Hitler’s disciple.” However, their rhetoric reveals their true nature. For example some of the values they claim to subscribe to are:

- Exactly the same values as Osama Obama or the Clinton’s promote. They demonize Bush, are against fighting Muslim terrorism and are totally against any form of American patriotism.

-They proclaim that” the Jews” are behind everything people complain about.

-When people ask: “What can we do about it?” they recommend reading a long list of anti-Jew books for later discussion. They always ignore people who push them about forming proactive white advocacy groups with the following sub- arguments:

---"I don’t want to get arrested, do you? Its illegal to be white.”

---"The only workable political groups are uniformed nazis or the KKK.”

---"White people are not ready yet. If Obama is president for 2 or 3 terms the whites might get riled up to begin fighting.

---You have to be real careful there are a lot of federal infiltrators about.”

- The infiltrators claim to like black racists because they “hate Jews too,” When people start talking about the threat of black racism they return the topic to “the evil Jews” or they talk about violence against Mexicans.

- They are very verbal in supporting Iran.

-When any pro-white argue very long with them, they always start name-calling. However, the names are the same type of names that leftist or black racists use when attacking white people. They call any pro-white opponents: “neo-cons, “rednecks,” “white trash,” and ignorant thugs,” “certifiably crazy,” to name a few.

-They say frequently: “you have to be a racist to be a white person.” When it is pointed out to them that tormentors of whites are ant-white racists, they say: “Nobody is more racist than WE are.”

- They fight against white organizing and white political participation. They always same: “This is not political, this is racial. The two parties are one and the same. They run things. we can only burn crosses...but be careful.”

-They never attack Obama or Clinton. They attack Republicans and especially McCain. They constantly demonize any well known republican as a “sheep in wolves’ clothing” or some other similar absurdity.

-They always work in threes. Sometimes there are two or four, but mostly there are three of them. They don’t stand together, and in forums they have different names, but they always support each other.

-They are very ignorant about politics and sound very much like the typical black racists or leftist I encountered in college.

-Sometimes they “try to show a human face.” They interrupt forums or proceedings to talk about pets or they post kitten pictures all over the forum. They tell negative jokes about republicans. Sometimes they suck up to any white women present by talking about their less violent and more conciliatory tones being more appropriate then the violent ways of men. On one political forum the infiltrators were active in getting a group of women to establish a “recipes” thread. They seemed to promote such distractions whenever possible.

-The infiltrators say things like: You may hate the left but all white nationalists are socialists and Hitler was too.” “You sound like a neo con.”

It is very bizarre to see what is really going on within the so-called white supremacist ranks. By the way, everyone now seems ashamed to say they are supremacist, now they are “separatist.” They really say little that might be termed “racist” or even promote the many achievements of the white race.

I researched the white movements of the past 100 years. I also interviewed some older people who were involved 20-30 years ago. Strangely enough, many of the things emphasized by current leftist infiltrations, with the exception of demonizing “neo-cons” and Republicans, were used then. The result was the same too. Any who tried activism didn’t know what to do and were goaded into breaches of the law and put away for 30 or 40 years (or weapons or drugs were plated on their property or they were charged with pedophilia). The non activists were intimidated by all of that. They all said one thing though, and used the same words. “The FBI and informers of the FBI controlled all Klans and nazis then and they still do.”

The inferiority of the White race is obvious. Now there are many ways in which we are superior, at least by our own standards. We did put a man on the moon. We did invent the transistor and the computer and virtually every other technological marvel of this age. Our race has produced men like Shakespeare and Socrates, Pythagoras and Poe, Robert E. Lee and Julius Caesar, Michelangelo and William Shockley. These men and the civilizations that we and our kind have built are worthy and admirable. We deserve to survive. I have devoted a good part of my life to saying that.

But as worthy and admirable as our race may be, by our standards, it must be admitted that there is a higher standard. It is the only objective standard. It is Nature’s standard. As one of the greatest minds of this century, Dr. Revilo Oliver, has stated in his book America’s Decline: “The only objective criterion of superiority, among human races as among all other species, is biological: the strong survive, the weak perish. The superior race of mankind today is the one that will emerge victorious—whether by its technology or by its fecundity—from the proximate struggle for life on an overcrowded planet.” In other words, if we succeed in surviving the next few centuries, we can objectively be called superior to those races that do not survive.

White Americans are at present markedly inferior to other races in many crucial survival skills. One such skill is the ability to organize and stand up for the interests of our own race. We are all familiar with the NAACP, the Nation of Islam, the Black Caucus, the Urban League, and many other racial organizations working for what they perceive to be the interests of Black people. Those well-known names are just the tip of the iceberg. I have before me the standard reference work on organizations in the United States, the Encyclopedia of Associations. Under the category of Black organizations, I find some 300 separate listings, including the Black Book Writers Association, the National Association of Black County Officials, the National Association of Black and Minority Chambers of Commerce, the National Association of Black Veterans, National Association of African-American Students of Law, the Emergency Black Survival Fund, the Black United Fund, the Association of Black Women Historians, the National Conference of Black Mayors, the National Black-Owned Broadcasters Association, the Council for a Black Economic Agenda, the National Association of Black Journalists, etc., etc., etc. I could go on for hours.

Now let’s turn to the page which lists Jewish organizations. Numerically, there are far fewer Jews in the United States than Blacks—but in the Encyclopedia of Associations there are at least 600 Jewish organizations listed. We’ve all heard of the biggies—the B’nai B’rith, the American Jewish Committee, the Zionist Organization of America, etc. But have you heard of the other 5 or 6 hundred? The Jewish Committee on International Affairs, the Jewish Student Press Service, the Coordinating Body of Jewish Organizations, the Jewish Documentation Center, the Association of Jewish Campus Professionals, Association of Jewish Book Publishers, and on and on and on and on . . . .

Since Whites are 80% of the population, they should have at least 48,000 pro-white advocacy groups, but they have NONE. That sorry deficit has been preplanned and arranged, it is no accident!

“Since Whites are 80% of the population ... “

I assume you’re referring to the USA? If so, we are no longer 80% of the population. We’re approximately 65% at most...and that percentage is in steep decline. Also, if you examine the age demographics and the replacement rate (TRR) of white vs non-white, the future looks even more bleak.

Does anyone think this anthropogenic global-warming myth is just another attempt to transfer wealth from the privileged white middle-class in the developed countries? The way I see it, the sh!tskin mud races of the world today harbor so much envy and resentment against the white race that their only palliative is to transform ours into a race of global slaves.  They want us, the white race to become the the new world helots, and they wish to be our masters. That is the only thing they feel would restore them to an equal footing with the white race. That is the only thing that will heal their wounded pride. (It reminds me of the Seinfeld episode about Kramer and the poor monkey at the zoo who feels depressed so long as he cannot realize his revenge on Kramer.)

I think global warming is the heaviest yoke that will ever be tied around the necks of the white middle class. Just think, not only do they want us to ride bicycles everywhere and live without air-conditioning (read Obama’s recent comments), but what, just what do you all think they are going to do about the poor, “economically-disadvantaged” ( read lazy ) blacks who cannot afford to make the switch to green, “sustainable” alternatives? Who do you think is going to bear the burden of subsidizing all the blacks so that they can afford curly-cue lightbulbs, new flex-fuel cars, rising food costs etc.? Here is the rundown of future events if we don’t stand against the rising tide:

The first thing that’s going to happen if this country adopts emissions caps:

1.) Blacks will riot, bicker and contribute to a huge crime-wave due to the increased cost of living that they feel (as always) falls hardest on them. ( We are already starting to hear this in the public dialogue.) These riots and stealing of gasoline are simply more TNB- Typical N!gger Behavior, but they will, as always wrap it around some fake cause or perceived slight.

Then,

2.) Whites will be forced, as part of the ghetto armistice agreement to pacify blacks, to lend our full aid and support, as a show of good faith, and fully subsidize the underprivileged in this country by working an extra 2 months a year (we already work the months of Jan- March each year just to pay our taxes as of now ) to buy every black and hispanic a BRAND NEW CARRRRRR!!!!!!!  -sans Price is Right voice, with free year supply of methanol, (to be extendible at the end of one-year period, and each consecutive year period thereafter, not void where prohibited)

3.) Blacks will take the free handouts, and do as they always do: more TNB-Typical N!gger Behavior: Spend it on drugs, dollar-store junk, new Nikes, Sean Jean clothes, rims for their cars and stereos, pop out a few more future criminal babies.....then complain that the white man has purposefully been keeping the black man down by making available to them drugs, dollar-store junk, Nike apparel, Sean Jean, rims and stereos.  We will then need to fund a multi-trillion dollar initiative for targeted advertising and after-school programs to educate blacks on how not to spend their money on drugs, dollar-store junk, new Nikes, Sean Jean apparel, rims and car stereos and teen pregnancy.

Then the white middle class in this country will be reduced to third-world living conditions while blacks continue to scoop up the best jobs, schools, and government spending initiatives and all will go on just as it has for the last 30 years.....
Unless whites voice a resounding NO and stand ready to lay down our lives, reputations, jobs, what have you, so that we may live as a race of noble, free men and women.

We need “the will to power.” We need that slavemaster-mentality again. We need those “colonialist, racist, imperialist” values or we are never going to survive the 21st century because let me tell you, the Red Chinese, India, and the muds of this world have wet their fangs and our thirsting for our blood, our oppression and humiliation. And they will take all we have if we offer it to them.

Here’s a typical post I found on a global warming message forum recently. This is the kind of self-loathing, self-abdicating attitude we need to be rid of if we are to survive. This is the tone that the guilt-ridden, brainwashed apologist adopts in his outlook and speech:

“The West reaped all the benefits of the industrial revolution but now we refuse to shoulder the consequences.”

That is pure capitulation and folding under pressure. That is a person who has no audacity, no vitality, no “will to power.”
Beware of anything with the word sustainable in it. What that means is YOU will sustain the bread and meat on the plate of the world’s third world masses. It means enslavement. Be vigilant out there.

Did you ever finish this?