Did Van Jones leave a legacy for European-Americans to profit from?

Posted by Guest Blogger on Friday, 11 September 2009 00:42.

Van “Well the answer to that is, they’re assholes” Jones has quite a mouth on him. As the man who brought race to the green agenda with his statements about “white polluters” and “white environmentalists steering poison into the people of color communities,” he didn’t hide his opinions too much. Thus, in the end, the midnight departure of this supremacist from federal employment.

I hesitate to call him a racist, by the way, because that term has lost all its meaning in both the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture. Besides, anyone who flinches at being called a racist is way behind the times. But the same can’t be said of ...

Supremacist, hypocrite, bigot, divisive

It was clear from his claim that all Euro-Ams are clones of each other and lack diversity, that Jones was a hard-core supremacist. He was, by his own statements, also a bigot and divisive. His caricature of white Americans pointedly made no reference to nationality (e.g., American) or to continental origins (e.g., Europe). We happen to know from other sources that to verbally strip blacks of their American nationality and their African origin is regarded by Jones as a wholly bigoted and divisive act.

... liar

And he was a liar for saying that school massacres are only carried out by ‘suburban white kids.’

Most of the dominant media culture, a creature controlled by the urban-coastal class, flinched from reporting Jones’ anti-white rhetoric. Instead, the emphasis was laid on his remarks about Republicans and the 9/11 Truthers. Reporting of Jones’ racism was suppressed. That the dominant media culture on TV and in print acted so uniformly (except for the instance of the article referenced above) tells us all we need to know about the media bosses dislike of “whites” roused by black radical rhetoric. It also tells me that they definitely do not respect RD’s position that denigration and dehumanization of European Americans is not to be tolerated.

But something good may have came out of Jones’ full-on attack on “whites” as a demographic - most probably, some of us woke up to the fact that, for the Obama Administration, we are marked by the color of our skin.

That said, a close reading of Jones’ comments yields something even more useful. It’s ironic of course, given his racism, but some of his claims we can build on.

Two Quotes That Should Open Euro-Am Eyes

Jones:

“Young white males are suffering in this society. Profoundly. And nobody is saying a word about it.”

Jones is right. When have you heard about members of the diverse white American peoples mounting a campaign to rescue lost young white kids living on the sidewalk, or in grave difficulty with drugs or crime? That we just trust the government to do this work is alarming when we know all the things wrong with the heavy hand of government.

Jones:

“It is just as evil in my view … to neglect and to ignore these young white men who, as best I can tell, have very little in the way of loving, affirmative male leadership.”

Without accepting his comparisons with other demographics, we have to agree - we have no Committee of 100 White Men to help these kids, for example.

And, by the way, I don’t want to hear that we are not allowed to have such organizations. Of course, we may do such things if we like. There is a delicacy in wording and arguing to be observed, but it is certainly “allowed”. Staying white-centric in using the white voice is the key principle.

Conclusion

The fact is that young European American boys and girls are seriously over-represented in three negative socialized situations: binge alcohol drinking, methamphetamine use, and tobacco smoking. But where are the white men and women to press for programs, volunteer and otherwise, to reduce these behaviors?

Various demographic groups have no hesitation about demanding social aid for their kids when their kids are over-represented in areas of social illness (even Asian Americans do it), but I have yet to hear a single white parent, leader, pastor, or bishop speak out of his or her white voice to demand the rescue of these kids.

Here is what that would sound like, “As a white American, I demand an adequate and decent program in this city directed at strengthening young Euro-Am kids in their fight against ...”

Or, “As a European American, I’m announcing a planning meeting next week for white parents to discuss how to strengthen our kids in their fight against ...”

Maybe the Jones Legacy will have a positive impact after all.

Tags: Activism

Comments:

Posted by Lurker on Sun, 13 Sep 2009 07:16 | #

Latest in a series of requests….

MR should link to Fellist’s blog.

Posted by Gorboduc on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:19 | #

Blimey! A few months ago some self-appointed censor, disliking my admittedly somewhat hurried style of composition, got extremely angry and told me in no uncertain terms to bugger off and never darken this site’s doormat again.
Being shocked by the sheer level of almost physical aggression that I’d aroused, I did just that: contritely but disobediently returning, I wonder if Andrew, just above, will be likewise castigated for a rather similar “stream-of-consciousness” presentation?

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:06 | #

Gorboduc, you eccentric old bastard, why not stick around and instruct us in the fine art of Christian racialism and high-idiom and whatnot? Seriously (i.e., not bullshit).

sheer level of almost physical aggression

Calm down, it’s just the Internet. Although we who observe the ever worsening trend of the eclipse of our race tend to get a bit worked up over that fact. Genocide sucks, er, I mean isn’t highly palatable.

Posted by Captainchaos on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:21 | #

Here is the Big Project you can help us out with: Why Christianity doesn’t mandate its White adherents accept their race-replacement in their homelands and being mongrelized out of existence by chinks, wogs, mestizos and niggers. Or does Christianity, at least your understanding of it, require their acquiescence in that?

Posted by Lurker on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 03:34 | #

Andrew has been posting comments like that since day one (more or less) of MR. No-one has got upset about it.

Posted by Gorboduc on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:16 | #

No, no, I’m not upset by ANYTHING Andrew said! More power to him…I was only asking…
I too can use a bit of language where neccessary. I was merely remembering the thorough drubbing I’d received and which I thought was the result of a certain informality of presentation, which appeared to someone, I can’t remember who, perhaps the good Captain himself, to betoken a certain, ahem, mental disconnectedness, shall we say. I am better now.
No hard feelings to Andrew or Captainchaos, and please call Obama what you like.
Depends what you call Christianity. I will work on that one.
But I think that genocide is also being unconsciously supported by Darwinists too. I’ll work on that as well, but will probably be thinking along these lines: Darwinists teach that species, genera, phyla, whatever, disappear as the result of their losing survival value. It seems that if the white race is disappearing, Darwinists should at least ask themselves WHY it has apparently lost survival value, or what has allowed our enemies to outsmart us by gaining superior survival mechanisms.
Or maybe it’s a problem that is best stated NOT in biological/scientific form at all, and on which scientific Darwinists can get no proper purchase.
Moral values and ethics have entered this problem somewhere, but the blind force of nature - and it’s easy to supply Dawkins quotations to show that he and presumably his followers/fugleman DO think of her like that - won’t show you where you derive them from. Certainly not from the fossil record!
And just in case anyone’s remotely interested in this, I DON’T support the idea that its OK for our culture to disappear as long as it’s replaced by that of another bunch of whites, say the Poles or the European-type Turks. They may in many circumstances be our allies, but we’re not randomly interchangeable.
(AND they mayn’t actually be our allies either; there’s a well-established colony of Poles in South London some of whom have been here since just after WWII, and even now refuse to speak English. I visited there once in about 1980, and was told,“We prefer not to have to speak English”. Matters proceded through an interpreter. In fact I experienced the equivalent to what English folk often report on walking into a pub in Wales - and I’ve had that one too!
I found out more about this attitude by joining in, years ago, in a Solidarnosc vigil, in London, which I mistakenly thought would be a good opportunity for a little bit of anti-Communist agit-prop and collaboration: talk about welcome! Hah, I felt like a pork sausage at a barmitzvah.)

Posted by Guessedworker on Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:29 | #

Lurker,

If you know how to contact “the fellist” perhaps you would ask him to get in touch with me.

Posted by Lurker on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:12 | #

Alas no, Im just a reader of his blog, he does pop up all over the internet though.

Posted by Captainchaos on Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:17 | #

Darwinists teach that species, genera, phyla, whatever, disappear as the result of their losing survival value. It seems that if the white race is disappearing, Darwinists should at least ask themselves WHY it has apparently lost survival value, or what has allowed our enemies to outsmart us by gaining superior survival mechanisms.

Let me guess, false consciousness that amounts to the wages of sin. Note by the way, that when you speak of “our enemies,” meaning the Jews, if you reject MacDonald’s Darwinian interpretation of their nation and race destroying compulsions which are genetically bred to the bone in them you are force to adopt a culturist interpretation of their behavior being the result of them having rejected Christ, or some such thing; meaning, if they would just accept Christ, they would stop their nation wrecking, LOL! Get real.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 20 Sep 2009 21:20 | #

You’ve all seen this 2007 (Houghon-Mifflin publisher) school textbook cover on European History?

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/014305.html