EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY

Why is this insane propaganda being spammed onto the pages of Majority Rights? Who is behind it? Is it you, Guessedworker?

This is actually a massive step BACKWARDS from the bad old days of JJR, and actually makes me reflect on his infamous one-man blog-wrecking reign with something like nostalgia.

Steve,

Please remember that MR is a forum for discussion of, to quote the header, “issues affecting Western societies”.  It is not the spear-point of a single opinion, since no such singularity has evolved.

It must evolve, of course, or we will never escape the four horsemen - who, in my opinion and in no particular order, are the global power elite, the liberal zeitgeist, our advancing dispossession and deracination, and Jewish ethnic aggression.

Among those who believe in and, by their estimation, work for the survival of European Man are a good number who are singularly anti-semitic.  For them, there’s only one horseman.  Likewise, there are those who recoil from such advocacy, and hope against all the evidence that Jewry might yet recognise a mutuality of interest with us.  Both positions demonstrate the impact of Jewry on what should be the perfect unexceptionality of pro-European ethnic sentiments.  One cannot avoid it.  The only way forward is to accommodate - but not resolve - the conflict.

Accommodation begins with free speech.  It demands tolerance, patience and trust in the efficacy of our shared interests.  So let those of us with something to say speak freely, and likewise those of us with some objection.  We have nothing to fear from Constantin’s freedom of speech, and something to gain from the mental processes it engenders.

On the subject of National Bolshevism (for any newbies reading this, that’s the political philosophy espoused by Constantin), last night Friedrich posted the first installment of an anticipated multi-part overview of it.  (Speaking of anticipated articles, Scimitar expects shortly to post a full-length review of Prof. Sunic’s book.)

Steve Edwards is right.  Constantine does make one nostalgic for the days of JJR, something I thought impossible.

The most amusing thing about Constantin von Hoffmeister is that he represents the far end of one of the axes haunting this web site. One axis, for example, is to be found situated among the wistful plaints for the conservative part of the Conservative/Liberal political order.

But the most interesting axis is the one that runs from the pure world of ideas and ideological musings that are completely detached from any sense of worldly applications [like libertarian doctrines], on the one hand, to those posters who are imbued with a sense that we somehow need to attach intellectual preoccupations to the field of action in the real world with real people, on the other hand. 

Constantin von Hoffmeister represents the far end of that axis in that nothing whatsoever he says has anything to do with anything on the ground, and so he may be enjoyed as an amusing swimmer through the froth of the waves of memes crashing on the shores around us.

He can’t hurt us because he has no linkage to any tools, tactics, or techniques that would bridge the gap between ideas and worldly activity. Consider him the mutant hero of the web site, like Superman.

The Bolshevik Revolution should be praised.

HAIL the Jews who supported this glorious turn of events!

oh my, this entry should be deleted ASAP.

GW, is the Puffmeister going to be a regular and post his insane ramblings every week ? It would almost - almost - make me miss the days of John Jay Ray. JJR argued in bad faith but at least he was somewhat coherent and grounded in reality.

This decision of yours is a red flag for me. This is not how you’ll attract more readers.

GW

It is not the spear-point of a single opinion

of course but can’t you show better judgement at selecting the voices that you choose to publish? Come on. I’ve read saner and more mature commentaries in the pages of Trotskyists university rags.

And besides this blog shouldn’t have too many entries. Sometimes less is more. 

Scimitar:

but honestly, what are you thinking?

don’t feed the nationalfuturistobolshevistroll

Ziv Edwards and CvH and Soren Renner’s time-wasting!

There’s only so much swimming through shit people are prepared to do for the occassional very good stuff, GW.

“And yes, while Bolshevism was a child of the European Enlightenment (Marx himself said, “We are all Hobbes’ children") it was also unrepresentatively Jewish.  Why, if not for the reasons of ethnic advantage?”

Shouldn’t we have thought of that before we published a declared Bolshevik on these pages?

“And what does Constantin think of the creation of Frankfurt Marxism, which has become the template for advanced liberalism, and done such grave damage throughout the West?

Let’s hope we have some answers from the man tomorrow.  Then we can form a better judgement.”

I await that moment with trepidation. Do you really expect a sensible answer out of this?

Constantine’s apologists have already conceded that he is confused, illogical and unhinged. But they want to promote his stuff anyway. Is that really how far we’ve fallen?

On the subject of European democracy, I was just reading how the Belgian high court today disappointingly upheld Mayor Thielemans’ ban on that planned demonstration in protest against the current deliberate Islamization of the European continent (in what follows, watch the words highlit in red):

Mayor Thielemans banned the demo precisely because the organizers picked 11 September as the date for their protest. The mayor wrote:  “The intention is obviously to confound the terrorist activities of Muslim extremists on the one hand and Islam as a religion and all Muslims on the other hand. […] Such incitement to discrimination and hatred, which we usually call racism and xenophobia, is forbidden by a considerable number of international treaties and is punished by our penal laws and by the European legislation. The European Court of Human Rights has repeatedly pronounced judgments condemning this type of act.” He told The Wall Street Journal: “I won’t have Brussels regarded as the capital of racism.” [All links in this excerpt have been added to the original]

Then there was this (hat tip to The Civic Platform):

MADRID, Spain: Spanish police on Thursday arrested a right-wing writer and publisher wanted in his home country of Austria for repeatedly denying the existence of the Jewish Holocaust and the use of gas chambers, officials said.

Gerd Honsik was arrested in the southern city of Malaga, a police spokeswoman said. No more details on his arrest were immediately available.

Honsik had fled to Spain after being convicted in 1992 in Austria of neo-Nazi activities and sentenced to 1 1/2 years in prison for writings that defended Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich.

Between 1986 and 1989 Honsik published writings in a book disputing among other things that the Nazis systematically killed hundreds of thousands of Jews at Auschwitz and other extermination camps during World War II.

The Austrian judge who convicted him ruled that Honsik’s writings were a misleading propaganda-like presentation of Nazi activities and that they lacked objectivity.

The Vienna public prosecutor’s office said Thursday it had issued a European warrant seeking Honsik’s arrest, based on suspicions that he had committed other offenses since Austria enacted a landmark 1992 law making it a crime to deny the Holocaust or promote Nazi propaganda.

It was unclear whether or when authorities might lodge a formal request to have Honsik extradited to Austria.

Justice Minister Maria Berger (Socialist Party of Austria) said in a statement she was pleased with the arrest, calling it part of “the fight against racism and xenophobia." She said, “By means of the European arrest warrant we are able to ensure the effective prosecution of repeat criminals of the far right despite the still-extant differences in the national laws.”

And finally, there was this:

If you go through all the structures and features of this emerging European monster you will notice that it more and more resembles the Soviet Union. Of course, it is a milder version of the Soviet Union. Please, do not misunderstand me. I am not saying that it has a Gulag. [Scroob note: Yes it does: Irving, Rudolf, Zündel, and others are in it, exactly as Bukovsky and Solzhenitsyn were in the Soviet Russian one.] It has no KGB – not yet – but I am very carefully watching such structures as Europol for example. That really worries me a lot because this organisation will probably have powers bigger than those of the KGB. They will have diplomatic immunity. Can you imagine a KGB with diplomatic immunity?  They will [...] police us on 32 kinds of crimes – two of which are particularly worrying: one is called racism, another is called xenophobia. No criminal court on earth defines anything like this as a crime [this is not entirely true, as Belgium already does – Paul Belien note]. So it is a new crime, and we have already been warned: someone from the British government told us that those who object to uncontrolled immigration from the Third World will be regarded as racist and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly. Hence, we have now been warned.

(The reader is invited to draw his own conclusions at to Mr. Bukovsky’s ... prescience, in regard to ... “the future of European democracy,” shall we call it? ... Yes ... in regard to the future of European democracy ...)

Considering that Bolshevism was an urban movement, and Jews represented 30% of the urban population in Russia, one could argue that Jews were actually underrepresented in the Bolshevik regime. I do not buy the propganda that Bolshevism was “genocidal.” This claiem has been sufficiently debunked by scholars that do not subscribe to Cold War propaganda. I also do not believe that decadent cultural “Marxism” in the West is the equivalent of what the Soviets practiced in the East. As a matter of fact, it is the exact opposite! I explained this many times in many of my writings. Hence, I see no contradiction in being a member of the NPD and supporting Bolshevism. After all, the NPD published many favorable articles on Ernst Niekisch who was a National Bolshevik, jailed in the Third Reich and a high-ranking party functionary in the German Democratic Republic. About Frankfurt Marxism: I never praised it, even though it has some value, and the members of the Warsaw Pact certainly never practiced it. Essentially, Frankfurt Marxism was a Western and liberal perversion of Marxism. Besides, I am not a Marxist.

Constantin

re: Hoff’s answers to our many questions for him. Here’s a sample of what we got the last time he did that:

“"Do you think killing Europeans is a good way to liberate them?”

No, I do not. But the Nazis here sure do.

“When I hear or read the word “universal,” I want to get my pistol.”

Wow! You are real modern-day Goering, are you not?

“You call Marxism an ideology with “universal appeal”. Could you say to whom this appeal is directed?”

Not to chauvinist nationalists, obviously.

“seeing that National Futurism is seemingly more of a spiritual than political movement (toward the stars!), how do we get this spiritual impulse to space chasing and terra forming into the actual political debate?”

National Futurism is anti-spiritual. It advocates Racial Bolshevism, pure materialism. Only on the material plane can anything be achieved. Space colonization and terra-forming are not “crazy” subjects but valid considerations that have to be earnestly addressed if one cares at all about the future dominance of the White race. For example, one could point out the real danger of a meteorite hitting Earth, wiping out most life forms on it in the process. To avoid the scenario of extinction (through a “natural genocide"), it is essential that alternative worlds be found where our race can settle.

“Will Germany and Russia go it alone?”

This will be necessary in the first stage. Other European countries will follow once the path has been cleared. German discipline and technology, coupled with Russia’s natural resources, will be the pillars of the future Euro-Russian empire.

“Will they despair of the Anglo Saxons and the Latins?”

The Anglo-Saxons and the Latins will be forced to comply with the demands of the empire. Otherwise, they will perish, meaning that they will be absorbed into the imperial matrix.

“Will it be a Eurasian Imperium (channel to Vladivostock) - or a planetary Imperium Europa.”

First, it will be a Eurasian empire. This is necessary to build up strength. Slowly but surely, it will morph into a cosmic Imperium Europa. After all, biopolitics is more important than geopolitics. BLOOD before SOIL! Aryan seeds will be carried to far-away planets where they can blossom and grow into biological super-structures that will control and harness alien environments and be themselves enhanced by transhuman advances in technology. “

Remember everyone, NB is an ideology with universal appeal, an appeal obvious to all but ‘chauvinists’ like ourselves, which advocates the advancement of Aryan interests by killing Ukrainians, creating a ‘Eurasian Empire’, and raping the queen with a chainsaw. It appreciates the anti-imperial ambitions of the USSR and Nazi Germany (because killing Ukrainians is the best way to liberate them, see above). It moreover supports the forming of an anti-Zionist alliance with Israel (because the Jews just wanna get killed so as to be liberated, and we want to stop that...presumably). This Bolshevism also supports anarcho-capitalism...oh, and Soviet Communism.

I know this is suppossed to be a free speech site, but can’t GW just get himself a parrot, teach him the words ‘bolshevism’, ‘Jews’, ‘liberation’, ‘national’ and the other bare rudiments of a political vocabulary, and post the results instead?

The “Ziv Edwards” gibe is just complete nonsense and can be utterly dismissed.  For lots of reasons “Oops” can be forgiven much, but this particular bit pushes the envelope.  It’s close to an outrage.

One man doesn’t replace a race.

“Considering that Bolshevism was an urban movement, and Jews represented 30% of the urban population in Russia, one could argue that Jews were actually underrepresented in the Bolshevik regime”

Yeah, yeah! First you start with a false premis and then you take it from there. Organized popular rebellion aginst authority is NOT an urban phenomenon. Spartacus’s revolt took place in the provinces and there were numerous peasant revolts in medieval Europe. Social agitation in Russia’s urban conurbations was a consequence of the gravitation of social agitators towards centers of power and influence that happen, in this case, to have been urban. That’s the best horse before cart argument I’ve heard for a long time, it’s a bit like saying that a disproportionate ammount of sexual abuse happens in childrens homes because a disproportionate number of abusers work in the child protection industry, duh!

So, you interpret this passage of my essay as justifying the murder of Ukrainians? How do you do that exactly? I cannot follow your logic.

Constantin

Daryl wrote: “Though socialism is not the only way to secure the borders, a logical and rational argument can be made that it had that effect.  Stalin did not have massive immigration coming into his country.  We can view similar trends in the Orient, Mao did not have an immigration problem.  The Khmer Rouge, for example, cut down liberal education and reversed Vietnamese imperialism.  This is not to say that I am embracing socialism, but I can comprehend Constantin’s viewpoint.”

- Soviet leaders implemented what they talked. They first encouraged the many peoples especially near the borders to pursue their ethnic nationalistic interests in socialistic framework, lying to them that they are building their own autonomous and after some time maybe independent ethnic socialist nations. This was meant to exploit peoples’ natural ethnic nationalist tendencies in building Soviet international communism.  After some time Soviet leaders started to increase foreigner inflow to the ethnic areas. When ethnicities were flooded with foreigners, single Soviet standards, language, school systems, media etc. were implemented. Then mass murders and concentration camp sentencies followed. The purpose was from the beginning to create non-racial, non-ethnic, mixed homo sovieticus. Partly autonomous Eastern European countries were given some possibilities to pursue their ethnic interests while the ongoing battle with the Western countries was not complete. When communism would have been victorious in Europe the borders would have been dissolved, and the consequences would have been the same than inside the Soviet Union. What is not mixed in today’s Russia is that despite the utmost efforts of Soviet leaders.

China, Cambodia and North Koreans have been more ethnic nationalistic. China had and still in some form has racial laws, and North-Koreans has them in full force. That doesn’t make those murderous failed systems desirable. Genocide is genocide, whether done by mixing, bullets, hanging, hunger etc.

Finn:

“After some time the Soviet leaders started to increase the foreigner inflow into the ethnic areas. When ethnicities were flooded with foreigners, single Soviet standards, language, school systems, media etc. were implemented. Then mass murders and concentration camp sentences followed. The purpose was from the beginning to create non-racial, non-ethnic, mixed homo sovieticus. Partly autonomous Eastern European countries were given some possibilities to pursue their ethnic interests while the ongoing battle with the Western countries was not complete. Had communism been victorious in Europe the borders would have been dissolved, and the consequences would have been the same as inside the Soviet Union. What is not mixed in today’s Russia is so despite the utmost efforts of Soviet leaders.”

Vladimir Bukovsky:

“I am referrring to structures, to certain ideologies being instilled, to the plans, the direction, the inevitable expansion, the obliteration of nations, which was the purpose of the Soviet Union. Most people do not understand this. They do not know it, but we do because we were raised in the Soviet Union where we had to study the Soviet ideology in school and at university. The ultimate purpose of the Soviet Union was to create a new historic entity, the ‘Soviet’ people, all around the globe. The same is true in the EU today. They are trying to create a new people. They call this people ‘Europeans,’ whatever that means. According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed to wither away. [...]”

Fred, thanks for the addition and many others too.

Horror from Sweden. Swedes, you need independence and separation from your state:

http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=3031&cid=3&sid=102

Hoffmeister:Only traitors to Europe do not appreciate the hard work that they did for the betterment of our race. The accomplishments of the Jewish Bolsheviks will always be remembered by any self-respecting European patriot.

I completely agree with Friedrich Braun. No self-respecting WN website needs the ramblings of the Puffmeister, just taking him seriously even for debate should be a red flag for the sane and the serious out there. It’s a complete waste of time and worse a waste of credibility. Why don’t you have some costumed clown from the Supreme National Socialist Labour Alliance posting here while you’re at it ? At least he won’t praise the bolshevik mass murders.

There’s no difference between some dope smoking Che Guevara t-shirt wearing college student writing for a communist rag, taking Lenin and Trotsky seriously and writing pro-soviet poetry and someone like CvH. What are they good for ?? Who’s going to be attracted by their persona and their opinions ??

And I feel like I’m wasting my time writing this at the moment, I should be doing something else than to tell you what is obvious.

GW maybe you spend too much time working on the blog. There’s no need to post stuff everyday regardless of its relevance. Don’t forget that your current regular readers already know what is going on and if your goal is to attract more readers and unplug more normal white people from the matrix then the last thing you need is completely pointless debates based on CvH’s opinions or those of other nutty philosophers/dreamers who create those ready-to-think ideological kits sold to us as the key to saving the European race. We don’t need ideologies and especially not the puerile Marinetti-esque ones, all we need is our people to become white again, to think white and to act white.

GW:

Soren’s interview with him was very sound.

he didn’t asked him any serious questions. The guy praises the bolshevik revolution and all the misery, the destruction and the deaths it caused. WHY PAY ANY ATTENTION TO HIM TO BEGIN WITH ???

WHY PAY ANY ATTENTION TO HIM TO BEGIN WITH ? You should have asked yourself that question and answered it before deciding to publish this crap.

When I first read CvH on VNN I thought that’s it, Linder will just publish anything whatever the quality because he’s some freespeechist. The incoherence, the rigidity, the pointlessness, the nuttyness. Why did I spent 5 minutes reading that? It wasn’t even worth 30 seconds! I should have dismissed it after 10 seconds.

Is this how you want the newbies to feel when they visit MR for the first time ?

Why did I just read that nonsense ? it wasn’t worth 5 minutes of my time

Nothing written by CvH is worth posting on MR or anywhere for that matter but I see that you have made CvH a regular contributor. I’m disappointed and I’m out of here, I’ll be back in a few months to see if MR hasn’t gone further down. bye

Have a look at a few excerpts from the recent Fjordman piece which Finn linked above (2:50 PM), commenting on advanced Swedish liberalism:

A friend told him about a magazine published by Lärarförbundet, the Swedish Teachers’ Union, the largest union for teachers and heads of schools in the country. The magazine, aimed at preschool teachers who take care of children between the ages of 0-6 years old, included recommendations to not only promote “gender equality” but also “sexual equality” at this tender age. Mr. Lundgren considers the suggestions that are sent out to kindergarten and preschool staff to be clear-cut sexual abuse of children: 

“A three-year-old doesn’t have to learn queer theory, a four-year-old shouldn’t have to be force-fed lectures on gay sex by some sex freak from the Teachers’ Union. Children are supposed to play and discover their roles entirely on their own. Children are defenseless and shouldn’t be exposed to indoctrination, neither regarding sex nor politics.. (…)”

[...]

In a kindergarten in Stockholm, the parents were encouraged by the preschool teachers - apparently ideological pioneers - to equip their sons with dresses and female first names. There are now weeks in some places when boys HAVE TO wear a dress. Lundgren considers this sexual indoctrination as worse than the political: “The political nonsense is seeking to alter opinions - the sex freaks seek to alter the children’s personality, their mentality and their entire constitution.” [...]

Lundgren wrote in reply [to an e-mailed threat to get him in trouble by reporting him to the Teachers’ Union]:

“To give sex education to preschool children, to force them to have an opinion on gay sex and queer (lesbians, transsexuals, bisexuality, fetishism, cross over, sex change etc.) I regard as abuse of children. (…) Little children, we are talking about three to six-year-olds here, cannot in the preschool protect themselves from these sexual assaults.

[...]

“We have no ethical standards in education, and no rules for sexual behaviour,” in the words of Dr Gösta Rodhe, the then [1970s] head of the department of sexual education in the Directorate of Schools, and thus in some ways the executive officer of government sexual policy. “You see, since there’s a lack of tension in Swedish politics, younger people have got to find release and excitement in sexual tension instead.”

This was in the early 1970s. Things have gotten worse in the two generations since then. Socialists and state authorities present this policy as liberation of women and sexual liberation. What it is actually about is breaking down rival sources of power: The traditional Judeo-Christian culture and the nuclear family. This leaves the state more powerful, since it can regulate all aspects of life and, most importantly, can indoctrinate the nation’s children as it sees fit, without undue parental influence. The state replaces your entire nuclear and extended family, raises your children and cares for your elderly.  [Scroob note:  this last paragraph could’ve been lifted straight out of Jim Kalb:  it accords very much with his interpretations of part of what’s been going on with advanced liberalism.]

[...]

Socialist pioneer Alva Myrdal is the hero of the modern Swedish preschools. She wanted comprehensive education for special child carers who could provide children with competent guidance all day long. What the social engineers discovered later was that despite decades of state-sponsored gender equality propaganda, boys and girls still behaved differently. This disturbed them. Instead of concluding that maybe there are genuine, innate differences between the sexes, which sensible people would do, they decided to indoctrinate children more thoroughly, starting at an even earlier age, to eradicate gender differences.

[...]

Again, this has thus absolutely nothing to do with “tolerance or diversity.” It’s done in order to break you down and to mold you into a new human being. Great emphasis is placed on destroying the Christian heritage of the native population. Pupils are taught that they have been liberated from the superstition and oppression of Christian nonsense. However, while Christianity has been ridiculed and demonized for generations, so much that some Swedish Christians complain about persecution, Islam is presented in textbooks as a benevolent and tolerant religion, and Islam is granted a high degree of respect in the public sphere. [...] Meanwhile, Sweden is in the midst of the most explosive rape wave in Scandinavian history, largely caused by immigration. While Swedish girls are called “whores” by Muslim immigrants, Swedish boys are told to wear a dress and study queer theory.

The piece is worth reading in its entirety.  Caution:  have plenty of Maalox, Rolaids, or other antacids handy and oh yes, if possible some tranqilizers — that or a few ounces of whiskey to swallow, round about the middle of the piece, I estimate, with a few more toward the end —four or five ounces ought to do it, total.  Once you’ve got all that ready, you’re set to go ahead and start reading!

Also of interest from the Fjordman article;

“My 13-year-old son had ‘equality day’ [in school] and had to listen to a transvestite. I have myself never encountered or talked to one during my considerably longer life. Why is this important? Today’s children know nothing about the crimes of Communism, but everything about the sexual orientation of transvestites.”

This last comment is quite literally true. A poll carried out on behalf of the Organization for Information on Communism found that 90 percent of Swedes between the ages of 15 and 20 had never heard of the Gulag, although 95 percent knew of Auschwitz. “Unfortunately we were not at all surprised by the findings,” Ander Hjemdahl, the founder of UOK, told website The Local. In the nationwide poll, 43 percent believed that Communist regimes had claimed less than one million lives. The actual figure is estimated at 100 million. 40 percent believed that Communism had contributed to increased prosperity in the world. Mr. Hjemdahl states several reasons for this massive ignorance, among them that “a large majority of Swedish journalists are left-wingers, many of them quite far left.”

never heard of the Gulag, although 95 percent knew of Auschwitz.

It appears that Swedish media is heavily influenced by the Bonnier Group. The Bonniers are ... Jewish.

Bonnier is a taken name; originally the family was named Hirschel.

Of the seven largest daily newspapers in Sweden, the seven with a daily circulation of over 100,000, the Bonnier family owns four, Dagens Nyheter (the Daily News), Expressen (the Express), Sydsvenska Dagbladet (the Southern Swedish Daily News) and Dagens Industri (the Industry of Today). The largest of the private channels in Sweden is TV4. The Bonnier family directly holds 21,6% of TV4 and through their ownership of the Finnish based Alma media company they hold an additionally 23,4%, totalling up 45% and a virtual control. As head of TV4 we find the Jew Jan Scherman. Through Alma Media, Bonnier also controls MTV3, the most popular channel in Finland with 39,1% of the total viewing time (in 2001) and Subtv, the third largest commercial television channel in Finland, aiming mainly at young adults.

Apropos Finland, Bonnier also owns 23% of MTV in that country. In Finland, Bonnier also controls the leading daily Iltalehti and Kauppalehti, Finland’s largest business media with a circulation of 85.000 per day. Bonnier also control the printing house Lehdentekijät, that produces 40 regularly published magazines in Finland. In addition to that they own five regional papers, 15 local papers and nine free-distribution papers in Finland alone. They further control the Baltic News Service, the leading news bureau in the Baltic region, providing the world with news about the Baltic with a Bonnier touch.

Beside the Bonnier family in Sweden there is the Jew Peter Hjörne (Kaplan), owner and chief editor of Göteborgs-Posten (the Gothenburg Post; GP), the fourth largest newspaper in Sweden with a circulation of 253,700, reaching 600,000 readers daily. GP is furthermore the only newspaper in Sweden’s second city, Gothenburg. Hjörne is also the owner of two local newspapers, Bohuslänningen (32.400) and Strömstads tidning (5,200); both distributed in the Swedish north-west coast area. In addition he controls 22% of Liberala tidningars konsortium (the consortium of liberal newspapers) and thereby Nerike Allehanda (The eighth largest newspaper in Sweden with a circulation of 66,300), Motala tidning/Vadstena tidning (12,800), Bergslagsposten (10,600) and Nya Ludvika tidning (9,500). Finally he also holds 9% of Hallandsposten (31,000).

Hjörne is a part of the old Jewish establishment in Gothenburg and has his way to influence the Gentiles of that city. For instance, when the Jew Steven Spielberg¹s movie Schindler¹s List reached the screens Hjörne personally paid so all senior high school students would see it. The Bonnier family owns 30% and Hjörne owns 10% of The Swedish News-agency Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå (the Swedish Central News Agency), the mainly news source for the none-local news stories in most minor papers in Sweden.

The largest newspaper in Sweden is Aftonbladet (the Evening Post), jointly owned by the Swedish Labour Union and the Norwegian Schibstedt company. The chief editor, however, is the Jewess Helle Klein, great granddaughter of the former grand rabbi of Stockholm, Rabbi Gottlieb Klein. Her father, Ernst Klein, is influential in Swedish media as well. 1990-1999 he was the chief editor of Östgöta Correspondenten, the ninth largest newspaper in Sweden, and now he sits on its board. He furthermore is president of Svensk Presshistorisk Förening (Swedish association of press history).

Thanks to advanced liberalism it’s no longer a church in any sense of the word, Desmond, so there would appear to be no inconsistency.  It’s like the Unitarians, once a genuine branch of Christianity, today offering workshops on polyamory at their yearly meetings.  They’re no longer a religion.

A first-rate log entry by Scimitar over at the Occidental Dissent blog.  Read it, folks.  That’s all I can say.  No, I offer no “teaser” excerpts:  a teaser excerpt in this case would have to be the whole thing, it’s all so good.

“Europe is based on democratic principles”:

Just two problems with that statement in the context of this article: a. Europe isn’t; b. nor was the USSR.

“I am not a Marxist.” (—CvH, 8/30, 6:42 AM)

That’s a plus but how does it work?  What remains of bolshevism, exactly, after Marx is subtracted?  You might say “Bolshevism is Marxism-Leninism, so what remains after Marx is subtracted is Leninism,” but if Marx is subtracted little remains of Leninism either.  I don’t see how what remains ought to be called “Bolshevism” unless the “Bolshevism” part of the term “National Bolshevism” is meant in some very loose way.

The only good Jacobin is a dead Jacobin.

“Racism” deemed not just a crime in Europe, but as serious as terrorism: 

I took a class on the history and poltics of the European Union last year.  The prof was working with Powerpoint projections and at one point he was showing us a sheet which detailed cross-border coöperation between [European] national police forces.  There was a list of crimes that merit that kind of international attention:  money laundering, drug smuggling, terrorism, weapons trafficking, etc., and at the bottom list was “racism.” I recall looking around at the people sitting next to me to see if they showed any signs of surprise or something, but it just passed without comment.  [Emphasis added.]

More unjustified Jewish tribal attacks on Euro-Christians:

http://www.davidduke.com/general/motherhood-crusader-fired-from-german-television_2745.html#more-2745

In Communist East Germany they brought in olympic athletes from Cuba and let them stay in East German villages where they impregnated the women so some villages have half-Cubans growing up in them. The same is true for negro athletes they let in, though in smaller numbers.

I dont see why the breed of person who lives in a place should be allowed to be changed just because of a sporting event.

“Why are white women so willingly miscegenating with Negroes?” (—Tommy)

Does this dispel some of the mystery?

“Btw-- where are all the other posters?” (—Tommy)

In comments traffic, lulls always alternate with spurts.  For my part I’ve been refraining from posting so much, having just gotten another flurry of negative reaction to my commentary (the first being that gonstar flap the other month, in which a number joined gongstar), citing strong dislike of my general style, my “one-liners” (whatever those are supposed to be), my “trademark three-in-a-row comments” (didn’t know that was my trademark), and my being “a comment spammer, spamming the threads with my comments, pushing the other comments off the front page so people can’t read them.” As I said to someone, when criticism comes from the enemy I ignore it but when it comes from people on our side it’s time to make myself less visible.  I’ve tried to refrain from posting altogether, to give others a chance, and where I’ve posted I’ve kept it as brief as possible — a sentence or two, or just a link.

I think Fred is an excellent commenter, who should continue to comment as frequently as he likes. The last thing we need is for the author of “race replacement”, a VERY handy concept, to call it quits.

I don’t know what you people have against democracy.  One minute you claim to be for your “race”, “nation”, or “people”, and on the other hand you don’t consider them fit to run their own affairs.  Either you “love your race”, or you think they are a bunch of morons.

“There is absolutely no evidence of any anti-Ukrainian actions by the Soviet Union.”

You’ve got to be kidding, right?

http://www.ukemonde.com/news/rferl.html

5 million Ukrainians?  Are you sure it wasn’t 3? Or was it 7?  Or was it 10?  Had you bothered to look at the evidence, you would have seen that in response to famine, the Soviet government cut exports, lowered procurements to their lowest level in the 30s, and redirected grain back to the collectives from whence it was procured.  Care to post some demographic evidence for your claim? Because I have some demographic statistics and they show about 1 million excess deaths in the Ukraine.  I might also point out that had the Soviets not procured grain at all, millions throughout the cities of the Soviet Union would have starved, including Ukrainians.  Did the peasants have a right to starve millions of people?

Of course Russia and Ukraine suffered a famine that killed 9 million people directly related to the support of international imperialists backing the failing White Guards, but for some reason that is never referred to as a ‘man-made’ famine. 

Sorry pal, the “Ukrainian famine” isn’t going to faze me.

You can’t figure out the difference between a famine, which is a natural phenomenon, and the planned extermination of a people?  In case you didn’t know, much of the evidence for the Holocaust comes from the Nazis’ own documents.  Examination of Soviet archives reveals the exact opposite. 

Do you have any evidence that the Soviet regime deliberately tried to starve Ukrainians or any other group for that matter?  Because that would be news to those who have spent years researching in the archives. 

I find it funny that you think that Holocaust denial has something to do with the Holodomor(itself a contradiction in terms).  There is evidence for the Holocaust, there is not evidence for this Holodomor.  Even Conquest himself admitted that the famine was natural, and he also later admitted that the famine did not affect only Ukrainians.  Smart move on his part, since he arbitrarily quoted death statistics without even checking the demographic records or archival evidence.  But then again, Conquest was always a fraud anyway, and he was exposed as far back as the 70s.

“You can’t figure out the difference between a famine, which is a natural phenomenon, and the planned extermination of a people?”

Oh yes I can. I also can figure out the difference between a man made famine and one which is a natural phenomenon. The famine in the Ukraine was diffinatly, without a doubt, caused by Stalin and his overzealous gang of Bolsheviks. Ruthless Bolsheviks hellbent on imposing their policy of collectivization.

“ Policy of collectivization
Simultaneously, a policy of collectivization of agriculture was introduced and by early 1932, 69% of households were collectivized.[11] Even though several other regions in the USSR were collectivized to a greater extent,[12] the effect of the collectivization on the Ukrainian agriculture was very substantial. The collectivization campaign proved highly unpopular with the rural population: when collectivization was still voluntary, very few peasants joined collective farms. For this reason, the regime increasingly pressured peasants to join collective farms. To expedite the process of collectivization, tens of thousands of Soviet officials were sent into the countryside in 1929–1930.

At the same time, the “Twenty-Five Thousanders” (industrial workers and mostly devoted Bolsheviks) were sent to help run the collective farms. In addition, they were expected to quash the increasing passive and active resistance to collectivization by engaging in what was euphemistically referred to as “dekulakization”: the arresting of ‘kulaks’ — allegedly “well-to-do” farmers who opposed the regime and withheld grain from the state collection — and transferring kulak families to the Urals and Central Asia, where they were to be placed in others sectors of the economy such as timber.[13] Effectively, the term ‘kulak’ was applied to anybody resisting collectivization and many of the so-called ‘kulaks’ were no more well off than other peasants. According to the declassified data, around 300,000 Ukrainians out of a population of about 30 million were subject to these policies in 1930-31 and Ukrainians composed 15% of the total 1.8 million ‘kulaks’ relocated Soviet-wide.[14]

Collectivization had an adverse effect on agricultural output everywhere, but since Ukraine was the most agriculturally productive area (over 50% of wheat produced in the Russian Empire originated from Ukraine in the beginning of 20th century), the effects here were particularly dramatic. As projections for agricultural production declined, so did collections by the state. For the 1932 harvest, it was planned that there would be 29.5 million tons in state collections of grain out of 90.7 million tons in production. But the actual result was a disastrous 55-60 million tons in production. The state ended up collecting only 18.5 million tons in grain.[15] The collections by the state were virtually the same in 1930 and 1931 at about 22.8 million tons. For 1932, they had significantly been reduced to 18.5 million tons. “

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

http://www.faminegenocide.com/resources/causes.html

One more question Slavyanski: Are you Jewish?

You can’t figure out the difference between a famine, which is a natural phenomenon, and the planned extermination of a people?

That’s what Abe Foxman said a couple of years ago.

“The famine was not “man-made” get over it.”

Oh yes it was indeed “man made” GET WITH IT! I would suggest YOU do some real research and read factual history , not leftist propaganda.

http://www.infoukes.com/history/famine/

And Pulitzer prize winning Ann Applebaum’s “Gulag.”

http://www.amazon.com/Gulag-History-Anne-Applebaum/dp/1400034094

Btw-- you never answered the questions: 1)Do you believe in the OFFICAL version of the Holocaust, and,2) are you a Jew?

If you are a Jew, that would explain your insistence on downplaying the atrocities committed by the Bolsheviks specifically but not exclusively the man-made Ukrainian famine? As we all know Jews in great numbers played significant roles (in leadership positions) carrying out a multitude of atrocities committed in the former Soviet Union.  Jews want these uncomfortable truths about their criminal behavior kept swept under the historical rug, so to speak. It detracts from their monopoly on victimhood via the so called “Holocaust.”

TommyG: “And Pulitzer prize winning...”

be careful: the Pulitzer prize is worthless. the NYT reporter Duranty won a Pulitzer prize after he covered up the reality of the USSR to his readers.

TommyG: “and,2) are you a Jew?”

no he’s a former National Alliance member who became insane after having spent too much time on VNN Forum, he became a Bolshevik freak either before or after he moved to Russia and now he wants to be part of a new red revolution.

“TommyG: “And Pulitzer prize winning...”

be careful: the Pulitzer prize is worthless. the NYT reporter Duranty won a Pulitzer prize after he covered up the reality of the USSR to his readers.”

VLC, the Pulitzer prise board unknowingly awarded Duranty the prise before he was exposed as a two faced double dealing creep who was probably being blackmailed by the Soviet secret police. Even after a few screw-ups along the way, I still believe the Pulitzer prise still maintains it’s prestige.

Excerpt from the link in my post @September 16, 2007 at 12:46 PM | #

http://www.ukemonde.com/news/rferl.html

“The journalist he says played the most influential role in the cover-up was “The New York Times” correspondent Walter Duranty. A drug addict with a shady reputation, Duranty was also an avid fan of Stalin’s, whom he described as “the world’s greatest living statesman.” He was granted the first American interview with the Soviet leader and received privileged information from the secretive regime.

Duranty confided to a British diplomat at the time that he thought 10 million people had perished in the famine. But when other journalists who had traveled to Ukraine began writing about the horrific famine raging there, Duranty branded their information as anti-Soviet lies. Conquest believes that Duranty was being blackmailed by the Soviet secret police over his sexual activities, which reportedly included bisexuality and necrophilia.

The year before the famine, in 1932, Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize, America’s most coveted journalism award, for a series of articles on the Soviet economy. Liciuk says members of the Ukrainian diaspora, as well as Ukrainian politicians and academics, earlier this month launched a campaign to have Duranty’s award posthumously revoked. He said he hopes the campaign will make more people in the world aware of the famine.

A spokesman for the Pulitzer board, Sid Gissler, said the board has considered withdrawing Duranty’s prize on previous occasions but had decided against doing so because it had not been awarded for articles related to the famine. He said he sympathized with the Ukrainian campaign, and added the board would reconsider the question again later this year....”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

VLC: “no he’s a former National Alliance member who became insane after having spent too much time on VNN Forum, he became a Bolshevik freak either before or after he moved to Russia and now he wants to be part of a new red revolution.”

Thanks for the scoop on this guy, VLC.

LOL, so he’s just another delusional neo-commie...sort of like a Democrat lead by Comrade Hillary Clinton?

Here‘s a useful resource on the Holodomor.  Another is Lev Kopelev‘s book:  Kopelev was one of the Bolsheviks who were actually there, on the ground, carrying out the whole thing.

Now let’s deal with that insinuation that I went “insane”.  I love that comparison because right-wingers always whine and bitch if people insinuate that they are irrational or possibly mentally ill(some have suggested, for example, that anti-Semitism is related to a mental illness).  They also occasionally claim that the Soviet Union used to throw people who disagreed with the regime into asylums as “insane”.  Of course they can never seem to name one person who was labelled “insane” for his dissent, but it’s not like it’s the first time right-wingers have pulled things out of their asses without the facts to back them up(I guess the Ukrainian famine might have been one of the first). 

One would have to be insane to fully buy into the ideology of the National Alliance, and specifically Pierce.  I never did, having far more trust in a few intellectuals that showed some kind of promise.  Some were genuine, many were not.  Either way, to reject the National Alliance is a sign of sanity, not insanity. 

Now let us talk about the “Jewish Bolsheviks”.  This seems to be one of these sites where people just assume that everyone accepts the claim of “Jewish Bolsheviks”.  Bad news...most of the world does not.  You say “Jewish Bolsheviks” were responsible for “crimes” of the Soviet Union?  Fine- WHO, WHEN, WHAT? 

Contrary to nutcase claims, Jews were neither a majority in the Soviet leadership, nor were they the most overrepresented group.  In fact, nearly all groups in the Central Committee were overrepresented, including Great Russians.  Latvians had the highest overrepresentation. 

Lastly, to the moron who claims he wasn’t aware of any documentation proving the Holocaust, you might want to actually look into it some time.  Look up the Bichoff memos for example.  No, not at Zundelsite or some other nutcase haven, but at any credible historical site.  There it is in black and white.  There is far more than that if you actually took the time to look. 

Strangely, the Soviet Secret Archives have been open since 1991 and nobody seems able to find the documents that reveal a plan to starve millions of people- in fact, they find much evidence to the contrary.