Good priorities in Australian population policy

P.M. Howard signals extra support for parents

John Howard has signalled to low and middle-income families they can expect substantial tax relief in next month’s Budget, after identifying the need to help with the costs of raising children as his Government’s top priority. The Prime Minister also dampened expectations for significant change at the top end of the tax scale, saying the Government had already done a lot for high income earners, with the number of people paying the top marginal tax rate of 48.5 per cent falling from 14 per cent to 3 per cent in the past three years.

Mr Howard said yesterday rhetoric on tax reform meant little without a focus on the pressures facing families. “My Government places the low and middle-income families of Australia squarely in the foreground of our policy lens,” he said. “And strengthening the family - helping them with the costs of raising children - is the best way any government can reinforce social cohesion and stability in a changing world.”

After the $4 billion-a-year increase to the family tax benefit system in the 2004 pre-election Budget, the Government may choose to deliver help to families in a different way this year. In a speech to the Menzies Research Centre last night, Mr Howard said the family tax benefit system gave parents choices about how they balanced work and family responsibilities. “The Government has been especially keen to give families with children greater freedom to choose how they balance work and family responsibilities, including through additional support for those families who desire to have one parent - usually the mother - at home full time with children in their early years.”

He ruled out introducing a family income means-test on the benefit paid to mothers who choose to stay at home, saying that Labor’s proposal to cap payments where family income exceeded $250,000 was the “thin edge of the wedge”. He said the benefits were not middle-class welfare. “They are tax relief for a universal reality - that it costs money to raise children.” Mr Howard said nearly three quarters of recipients were on incomes below $50,000 a year.

But he said Labor’s plan would save only $6 million a year - meaning the Opposition must be planning to whittle down the threshold further if elected. “In government, Labor would have a much tighter income test which would effect tens of thousands of single-income Australian families who could by no stretch of the imagination be described as rich,” he said. “The family tax benefit system symbolises the great philosophical divide in Australian politics between a Labor Party that thinks government should direct people’s behaviour and a Coalition that sees its role as letting families make up their own minds.”

More here

Posted by jonjayray on Wednesday, April 19, 2006 at 01:08 AM in
Comments (2) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Al Ross on April 19, 2006, 03:47 AM | #

I’d have thought that if the number of citizens paying the iniquitous top rate (48.5%) has fallen that much, there must be a significant slowdown in wealth creation and capital accretion.

Posted by Steve Edwards on April 19, 2006, 09:49 AM | #

“John Howard has signalled to low and middle-income families they can expect substantial tax relief in next month’s Budget, after identifying the need to help with the costs of raising children as his Government’s top priority....”

This is not a “good priority” at all. The government is overwhelmingly subsidising the children of low-IQ parents, which in practice means expanding the size of the underclass (including ethnic minorities, indigenous people and radical Muslims).

And young, upwardly mobile couples are paying crippling taxes to fund this scam. No “libertarian” should support this nonsense for a moment.

Next entry: Medical research is starting to take account of people's race

Previous entry: Chris Brand

Important Issues

Practic

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Good priorities in Australian population policy

Comments:

Post a Comment: