How much for equal justice?

Posted by danielj on June 22, 2007, 04:37 PM | #

wow....

wouldn’t the money be better spent by simply giving one million dollars to one-hundred American families?

i’m sure they are going to turn this “operation aging klansmen” into some sort of mini-series or docudrama style reality show.

it will be just like the end of Fahrenheit 451 when they count find the guy, they will just set the hounds on whomever is in the wrong place.

Posted by Scimitar on June 22, 2007, 08:11 PM | #

I posted a blog entry about this the other day. The two men accused of murdering Emmett Till were put on trial and acquitted. Although they later confessed to the crime, both men died years ago. I checked the legislation and 1969 is the cut-off date. What sense does it make to spend over $100 million dollars to track down elderly murderers who are mostly dead? James Earl Ray, for example, died in prison about a decade ago.

Posted by James Bowery on June 22, 2007, 08:20 PM | #

What sense does it make to spend over $100 million dollars to track down elderly murderers who are mostly dead?

My point is slightly different.  My point is that if there is equality of justice before the law—what does this expenditure say about how much should be spent to make sure that black on white interracial crimes don’t remain “unsolved” given the fact that the problem is more than 50 times worse?  This is particularly important for this government to resolve since it is FORCING whites to accept blacks into their communities.

Posted by ben tillman on June 23, 2007, 12:20 AM | #

Bobo Till, like his rapist father, got his just desserts.

Posted by Alex Linder on June 23, 2007, 12:39 AM | #

Hulshof’s our rep up here in Kirksville. I’d like to run against him if I can get my circumstances right. Anyway, here’s a little piece I wrote for Kirksville Today.

Weak Kenny: a Profile in Cowardice

http://www.kirksvilletoday.com/?p=108

Posted by danielj on June 23, 2007, 01:52 AM | #

My point is slightly different..... -James

Noted. Let’s see… 60/1 violent crime rate makes… uhh…

6 billion??? Throw in another 50 million for robberies…

I’m not good at math and I program in a very high level language… Is that figure right?

Posted by gongstar on June 23, 2007, 10:58 PM | #

If blacks didn’t exist, Jews would surely have to invent them. Then again, is anyone sure they didn’t?

Posted by Scimitar on June 23, 2007, 11:49 PM | #

The cheap labor addiction is largely responsible for the Negro problem in America. The illegal immigration crisis, too. Jews were imported as generic European cheap labor to work in the Northern manufacturing belt during the late nineteenth/early twentieth century.

Posted by Calvin on June 24, 2007, 12:26 AM | #

In reality it’s all about an economically privileged minority defending the system that bestows that economic privilege. The majority for whom this system is economically and socially detrimental must be portrayed as being motivated by something other than economic self-defence. To this end the elite have create a myriad of bogus definitions that portray opponents to the system as being inspired by ignoble motives such as “hate”, “bigotry” and “ignorance”.

Hate crime: An assault by a white person upon a non-white person.

Love crime: An assault by a non-white person upon a white person.

Civil Rights: The rights, belonging to everyone, protected under common law.

Civil Rights Legislation: An amendment to the legal code that awards special privileges to non-white people.

And so it goes…..! In the end you are either a direct financial beneficiary of a system that encourages an unrestricted labour market, or you belong to the class of secondary privileged individuals who are of all of the people necessary for the administration of the regime, mainly, of course, government employees. These people provide the same service to the economic elite that party members did under communism or the priesthood did under feudalism.

http://voxceltica.blogspot.com/

Posted by torgrim on June 24, 2007, 05:43 PM | #

“And so it goes....! In the end you are either a direct beneficiary of a system that encourages an unrestricted labour market or you belong to the class of secondary privileged individuals who are all of the people necessary for the administration of the regime, mainly, of course,government employees. These people provide the same service to the economic elite that party members did under communism or the priesthood did under feudalism.”

I believe that this cuts to the central point and explains just why so many of Euro folk are compliant with this regime. Many of our folk are in the secondary class and benefit to the extent that they have some “support”, ie, health insurance,etc.

Those of us on the outside of this system, have always found a way to sustain ourselves. The problem for the elitists, today is, the sustainabilty of the system on the backs of those on the outside of this heirarchy.
The “peasants” are waking up, thanks to the avarice of the elites and their race replacement stragedy. Where do those arrogant and aggressive types think the traditional yeoman will do when confronted with complete marginalization?

Posted by 1 or 2? on July 13, 2007, 04:50 PM | #

Everyone knows White on Black crime barely exists; when it does we are reminded of it in perpetuity.  Conversely everybody knows Black on White crime is committed with impunity...it’s often celebrated, ie OJ Simpson. Whites have dug themselves into such a politically correct hole, only an act of God can save the White race. Obviously, at the moment, the masses of Whites have lost their collective will and courage to fight back against the subjugation and race replacement heaped upon them.