“The letter was the subject of a complaint submitted on behalf of Mr Safi Hareer, General Secretary of the Sudanese Darfurian Union, by George Newhouse of Newhouse Lawyers, with the assistance of David D Knoll, President of the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies and Ms Anna Katzmann, SC.” (—from the log entry)

George Newhouse is, if memory serves, Jewish.  (His sick antics came up in another thread and his ethnicity got mentioned.) True to stereotype, then, here are three Jews trying to both muzzle and take revenge on a Euro for attempting to defend his race and ethnoculture. 

What he’s trying to defend his race and ethnoculture from is slow genocide favored and aggressively promoted by (among others) Jews.  And here we see these three Jews giving a crystal-clear demonstration of exactly that unpleasant phenomenon:  Jews attacking Euros in their race and ethnoculture, trying to destroy both.  (To keep someone from defending himself is the same as attacking him.)

It’s like looking at a living Nazi anti-Semitic propaganda poster. 

Why are Jews trying to genocide the Euro race and ethnoculture?  Will any Jew who understands it come forward in this thread and explain it? 

Jews didn’t like being genocided by the Nazis very much.  Now they try to inflict genocide (albeit a slower version of it) on others.  Their opposition to genocide must not be a principled thing, but due only, in the case of the Nazis, to their being on the receiving end.

If a Euro Christian country has significant numbers of Jews among its citizens it can expect a few negative consequences.  These include the following:  1) Jews don’t understand Anglo-Saxon fairness—things like, for example, freedom of speech even speech you disagree with.  Jews, amazing as it may seem given their intelligence, don’t understand that notion.  There must in humans be a separate “fairness” gene—which the Jews lack—alongside the “verbal dexterity” gene—which they possess.  Whatever the genetics of it, Jews always want to forbid and punish speech they disagree with.  That’s one bad thing they do in Anglo-Saxon societies.  Another bad thing is, 2) they are continually actively trying to inflict slow genocide on Euros or to prevent Euros from resisting their own slow genocide.  For all the good Jews bring to Euro society, these are two of the very bad things they bring. 

The Nazis had official anti-Semitic propaganda.  Why do Jews behave even worse than they were depicted as behaving in Nazi propaganda posters?  You’d think they’d go out of their way to do the opposite.

“Mr Boag categorically asserted that “the violence in America’s deep south…was caused by whites.” (—idem)

(In light of the rest of what’s going on here, I think we can be forgiven for wondering if Boag is a Jewish name—anyone know?) First, Negroes in Dixie (what Mr. Boag calls “the deep south") were until the post-60s period among the least crime-prone of all Negroes in the U.S.  So why does Mr. Boag identify characterisations of Negro crime rates with Negroes of Dixie?  Second, it’s known that violent street crime in the U.S. is perpetrated by Negroes, not whites.  So he can’t be referring to the perps when he blames whites, but is of course saying whites cause Negro crime by their treatment of Negroes.  But this is begging the question in typical Marxist fashion, so I hope no one will mind if I give a big yawwwwwwnnnnn right now ...

Finally:  I would call on the Jews to stop trying to genocide Euros and on those Jews who don’t agree with what the culpable Jews like Newhouse are doing to make more of a public show of opposition to it.  First, it’s only the right thing to do, and second, it would show the world that not all Jews support it.

What’s the ethnic origin of Mr. Mr von Doussa?

What’s the ethnic origin of Mr. Mr von Doussa?

European Caucasian, with a touch of Transylvanian to judge by the teeth.

What’s the ethnic origin of Mr. Mr von Doussa?

http://www.adelaide.edu.au/news/news7661.html

Oh, I see—the exception applies only if the statement is made “reasonably”:

http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/47/0/PA000310.htm

Mark,

Why does that surprise you? That’s the way Jews behave everywhere in all white nations.

I will venture to say that the majority of those Jews were also part of the anti-Apartheid cult (fully backed by legions of Anglo do-gooders) and they created the situation which then led to them having to flee South Africa.

This is old hat. And this is fundamentally why Jews will never be even remotely sympathetic to WN. It is not going to happen even if we bend over backwards to accommodate their every whim.

Karlmagnus, I don’t like the “jews as cosmic enemies” approach either.

Even so, it can’t be denied that in this case there is involvement not just by Jewish individuals but by representatives of Jewish organisations.

And it does seem significant to me that a Jewish organisation, many of whose members have fled black crime, should be persecuting a man for warning about the negative effects of black crime.

Anyway, why get excited by a Jewish professional agitator with only peripheral involvment; the attempt to suppress free speech is being carried out by a German.

Martin,

I was responding to Mark’s point about how a Jewish professor is still pushing the same line even though Sydney now has thousands of Jews who are basically refugees from African barbarity.

There are two types of suicidal behaviour Martin: (1) Suicidal behaviour of a people who have lived in ethnically homogenous societies who then preach morality to the Earth - Swedes, for example starting with the odious Myrdal; (2) Suicidal behaviour of a people who should know better - the Jews running from SA fall into this category.

I have never said that Jews are the only ones doing it. One of my closest friends is an Anglo South African whose family is stuck forever in that hell hole. And he is a total racial liberal - he hates the Afrikaners, he keeps yapping about the evil of “racism” and has no qualms about Europe being turned into another version of Tunisia. And half his family had to flee “Zimbabwe” and Mugabe’s murderous mobs.

In other words, he is another insane Libertoid. His motivation is vanity. The Jewish motivation is a belief that it is in their self interest because it is supposedly “good for the Jews”.

My SA Jewish wife was always entirely aware of the attempts to demolish apartheid by elements of the SA Jewish community, and was loud in her condemnation of them (she knew Helen Suzman well, and HATED her.)

There are a small number of Jews who are like your ex-wife. I have no doubt that there are such Jews but they are marginal elements in the Jewish community. And not only that, “mainstream” Jewish behaviour means that they are then torn between two extremes: 1) the love of their own - which is natural and healthy and that’s what we are trying to preserve too and cannot object to for others; and 2) the obvious obnoxious behaviour of their own community which makes them sick but there is nothing they can do about it. Not only that, they then get unfairly tarred along with everyone else in their community as also being party to this (rightly or wrongly).

I don’t envy their predicament. Their position is not enviable. The best “solution” for them would be to convert to Christianity and assimilate completely into the white majority and forever break their ties with the Jewish community. But that is asking too much. We are all human and cannot forego our relatives and our families.

So there is no escaping their dilemma. It is sad. But their predicament is a natural consequence of the behaviour of their community.

The Jewish push for abolition of apartheid came from both the the top economic stratum of South African society (eg,Helen Suzman, Tony Bloom, Donald Gordon and Harry Oppenheimer, the latter’s family conversion to nominal Anglicanism notwithstanding) and the Communist scum stratum, the White-hating Joe Slovo.

When apartheid was abolished, Oppenheimer’s son Nicky made plans to relocate both himself and his flagship company, Anglo American, to UK and Donnie Gordon followed suit with his Liberty International property business.

It is also true,of course, that the richest Afrikaaner, the late Anton Rupert, also re-incorporated his main business concern in Zug, whilst safeguarding his South African tobacco interests by selling them to London-based BAT and becoming the largest stockholder.

Complaining about whites denouncing jews is like critisising a child for crying for crying when he’s being beaten.

....i shouldn’t have said ‘litigation via the HREOC’, as the illegitimate HREOC has no legal power to enforce anything(though like all good bolsheviks,they had tried to in the past, but the Federal Court in 1995 ruled them assuming any judicial power unconstitutional).

I understand fully that there are sound historical reasons why they think and behave the way they do. In fact, virtually any other community in their place would do the same.

I disagree with that conclusion. Historically, Jews could’ve “choosen” any of two paths:

1) Assimilate into European society- Jews are (almost) phenotypically indistinguishable from EC after a generation or two of intermarriage.

“Anti-semitism” is a response to the result of Jews walking the other path, whereby they:

2) Maintain a separate racial identity, engage in ethnic nepotism for fellow Jews, and establish parallel and often stealth group structures promoting their interests, often in direct opposition to the host population’s welfare. The second path is dictated by the religion itself. For this reason there is absolutely zero possibly that organized Jewry shall ever morph into the a benign elite like the Parsis, as Steve Sailor wishes they would.

TJB

Multiculturalism not for Israel - Leibler
Herald Sun, September 27 2000
by John Masanauskas

http://globalfire.tv/nj/03en/jews/purejews.htm

Melbourne - Jewish leader Isi Leibler, a staunch defender of Australian multiculturalism, says the policy has no place in Israel.

“This is a country which was set up and created as a Jewish country for the Jews,” he told a Jerusalem newspaper.

Mr. Leibler has previously said that multiculturalism in Australia was something that “we are all proud being part and parcel of.”

The founder of Jetset Travel moved to Israel two years ago as chairman of the World Jewish Congress. He recently published an essay arguing that Zionism, or Jewish nationalism, was under threat in Israel by “post-Zionists”.

“A post-Zionist is someone who actually looks positively towards the end of the Jewish people in ethnocentric terms, as a national group, and no longer sees the Jewish people as one united people,” he told the Jerusalem Post.

Mr. Leibler said post-Zionists were pushing a universalist agenda in schools aimed at eliminating Jewish nationalism and creating a multicultural state.

But Mr. Leibler, 65, has the opposite view of multiculturalism in Australia.

During the Pauline Hanson debate in 1993, he warned that multiculturalism was under threat by extremists.

“There is a need to sit together and establish a way in which Australians can recapture that spirit of multiculturalism which I think we are all proud being part and parcel of, and which is really under threat,” Mr. Leibler said.

For the slow among us, Raab is a Jew.

That climate has not yet been perfected

I wonder what is meant by that? “Perfected”? Perfect what? By whom? Surely Jews do not “conspire”??? And surely not by the means of interbreeding and immigration-replacing the would-be “Nazi-Aryans” out of existence?

They have it wrong of course. European genes aren’t essential or absolutely indispensable for Jew-hatred. The Arab world is mostly a racial mix and Jew hatred is greater there than anywhere else.

I think these people will soon learn a few tough lessons in France where one third of all births are already North African/African and overwhelmingly Muslim.

David Frum and a couple of other neocons at the American Enterprise Institute have come out against America’s suicidal immigration policies. However they are still a minority within the cabal and I’m pretty sure immigration is well down in their priority list. Arguably the most important neocon is Bill Kristol - he’s certainly more important than David Frum - who has written an article for the Weekly Standard called “Y is for Yahoo”. Kristol claims the pro-immigration side has won the debate (that’s news to me) and dismisses Tom Tancredo as a an “anti-immigration yahoo”. Needless to say Kristol is a die-hard supporter of Israel and I don’t expect any future articles in his Weekly Standard advocating open borders for the Jewish state.

“Needless to say Kristol is a die-hard supporter of Israel and I don’t expect any future articles in his Weekly Standard advocating open borders for the Jewish state.” (—Matra)

Exactly.  Which is the main point in regard to Jewish neocon support for race-replacement immigration:  it’s not principled but is merely a weapon for bashing Euro Christians.  (Likewise for many Jews who aren’t neocons.) Their obnoxious hypocrisy just takes the breath away.  There just are not words to describe how obnoxious they are being.  Irish Catholics also work for race-replacement, but they’re so dumb they actually believe all the “diversity” propaganda and want race-replacement for Ireland too. 

Jewish neocon hypocrisy is worse than Irish stupidity. 

And committing murder (what the Jewish neocons are doing) is worse than committing suicide (what the Irish Catholics are doing).

Speaking of the Irish (and Jews) John McCain (Scotch-Irish) is becoming quite a hero to Irish-Americans. Read this.

McCain comes across as a war hero turned true slimeball. Being in a place like Washington DC for so many years can do that to a man.

I actually think that if McCain had won, he would have been much worse than Bush (if such a thing is even conceivable).

The Vietnam War was a global racket run by criminals and traitors, who had no strategy except for wholesale slaughter for its own sake. At no stage did they ever hold the objective of actually winning the war by fighting the true source of communism - it was all about prolonging the destruction in order to sell weapons. It’s not surprising that many who were called up for duty and subjected to this corruption would be morally ruined by their experiences.

McCain is a megalomaniac and a career warmonger who would have wreaked far more carnage across the planet than any other President in history. He believes in war for its own sake - never to defend America. He would never dream of deploying the army to the Mexican border where Mexican security forces have been carrying out armed incursions at the rate of twice a month.

Ouch.....

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/juif.htm

< http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-Doc-Jews/Doc-Jews-Immigration&Multiculturalism;/+++BOOK-
CriticalJewishRoleInNonwesternUSImmigration/+++BOOK-CriticalJewishRoleInNonwesternUSImmigration.htm >

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=6988

http://christianparty.net/jewsimmigration.htm