iceland spar

Posted by Søren Renner on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 at 08:02 PM in
Comments (18) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by Guessedworker on November 25, 2008, 11:58 PM | #

People will do anything for money.  And they will do even more to get back money they’ve lost.

Posted by John on November 26, 2008, 08:33 AM | #

I know she’s probably a political idiot despite being a musical genuis, but nonetheless, Föck Björk!

http://www.news24.com/News24/Entertainment/Celebrities/0,,2-1225-2108_2422416,00.html

Posted by Turbo on November 26, 2008, 11:14 AM | #

John posted:

I know she’s probably a political idiot despite being a musical genuis,

Yeah she’s grate.

As in grates on my nerves.

Posted by torgrim on November 26, 2008, 08:03 PM | #

“the Icelandic songstress admitted to being only a recent student of economics and politics”...(from article)

Hopefully, the Icelandic people are intelligent enough not to follow the US example and listen to these.."media" types and stay away from the EU.

“Iceland like Norway, is not an EU member”....(from article)

It would be helpful if Norway and Iceland could form a economic confederation...however, Iceland probably fears a union with Norway, as it was a vassal of Norway, centuries ago. Better to form an alliance with kin, than the creature from Brussels.
I am fearful, that Iceland has been set up for this, and “help” will come with strings....like immigration, and slave like, dependency....but that will not set well with this people!

Posted by Jun on November 26, 2008, 10:55 PM | #

For JW:  Sorry this is completely OT—no idea how to contact JW otherwise—but I’ve been a regular reader of JW’s Western Biopolitics blog and just discovered that it’s now ‘invite only’.  :-( Can I get an invite, please?

Sorry for being so OT.  Thanks guys.

Posted by Carsten Westermarck on November 27, 2008, 05:47 AM | #

A blond people cannot be bad.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 27, 2008, 06:06 AM | #

“A blond people cannot be bad.” (—Carsten)

The Swedes being the exception that proves the rule.

Posted by John on November 27, 2008, 10:36 AM | #

The Swedes being the exception that proves the rule.

I think that some of what you find objectionable about Swedish people in general might simply be a case of too much something that would be a good thing in a different context or in smaller proportions.

*****************

The Icelandic economy is small enough and the people homogeneous enough that if they really wanted an effective way to protest, one avenue open to them they could all close out their bank accounts, burn their Krónur and simply refuse to use central bank “money” any more.

Posted by Lurker on November 27, 2008, 12:07 PM | #

I think Fred was joking. Im sure he’s never implied any such thing before now.

Posted by John on November 27, 2008, 09:30 PM | #

Here’s my revised suggestion to the Icelanders for an effective protest:

1. Take your Kronúr out of the banks—close the accounts
2. Get together and have a huge bonfire (preferably on the Winter Solstice)
3. Refuse to trade your labor or anything else for or with central bank “money” anymore—collectively defend your homes and businesses from banksters if anyone dares try to foreclose them
4. Let an organic currency take the place of what you got rid of as it naturally will.

Posted by cladrastis on November 30, 2008, 03:41 PM | #

Here’s my suggestion to the Icelanders:

1.  Wait until the next work day is in full swing; walk up to the doors of the Reserve Bank of Iceland, chain them shut, and burn the damn thing to the ground.

2.  Build some Viking ships and sail to England.  Ride up the Thames, take everything valuable in sight, and burn London to the ground.

3.  Do the same thing to every other capital of finance in Western Europe and take conscripts along the way.

4.  Be sure to burn the churhes and skewer the priests in the process - starting with the Anglicans.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 01, 2008, 12:10 AM | #

I can certainly sympathize with you about the Anglicans, Cladrastis ....

Posted by Eyebrow of the Beholder on December 12, 2008, 04:19 PM | #

Wow! Now THAT’S what I call a real looker!

She’s definetly hot! 

If she’s a typical sample of Iceland women, my brothers are ready to book their tickets - pronto!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 13, 2008, 01:41 AM | #

Beholder’s not into white people:  too pale, too blonde, too thin-lipped.  She dreams of some day marrying one of these guys (the three guys in front holding hands really get her juices flowing):

hindus.jpg

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 13, 2008, 02:15 AM | #

Beholder, of course, must be the same bimbo who signed here recently as “Celtic Empress” or whatever it was.  She comes here over and over in order to tell everyone how inadequate white men are and how ardently she dreams of meeting and marrying a dark-skinned Subcon (she uses the race-denial word “Asian,” so she might also mean Oriental, but given how she’s always singing the praises specifically of brown skin, she must mean Subcons primarily).  The question is, if she’s so set on marrying a Subcon as she claims, why in the world does she come here instead of GnXp.com or SepiaMutiny?  The sadest part is no Subcon (or Oriental) would touch her kind of female with a barge pole, and neither should any white man in full possession of his mental faculties.

Beholder, you’re destined to be an old maid.  With that women’s lib personality of yours you’ve made your bed, as the expression goes; now sleep in it (with your sixteen cats).  Your former “women’s studies” college professors, at least, will be very proud of you for keeping the faith, never deviating one jot from women’s lib, no, not even to find a husband.  Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, Susan Brownmiller, and of course Catharine MacKinnon, your college role models, are all, I’m sure, worthy heroines to whom to sacrifice your hopes of ever finding the male companion of your life.

Posted by torgrim on June 27, 2009, 03:56 AM | #

From my above post, Nov 26 08 @08:03PM,

Iam fearful, that Iceland has been set up for this, and “help” will come with stings...like immigration, and a slave like, dependency...but that will not set well with this people!

http://www.economicdisasterarea.com/index.php/news/man-destroys-his-house-i-have-nothing-to-lose,

http://www.economicdisasterarea.com/index.php/features/frederic-mishkins-role-in-icelands-collapse/

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 27, 2009, 03:36 PM | #

“I am fearful that Iceland has been set up for this, and ‘help’ will come with strings [attached] ... like immigration [...]” (—Gudmund)

If “help” comes, there will be immigration strings attached:  Iceland will have to start accepting Somali Negro immigrants, Turkish immigrants, gypsies, West African Sub-Saharans, etc.  The plan is to get all Eurowhites everywhere transformed into some other race, Negroes preferably but whatever is most readily available will do for starters.  This does not apply to Jews — the Jews are running it; they certainly don’t want to change themselves into Negroes, only Eurowhites.  So, Jews are exempted and that’s why you will never see open borders “adopted by” (forced on) Israel, only by countries the Jews running race-replacement see as the racial/ethnocultural rivals of Jews, like Iceland.  Yes, excessive incompatible immigration WILL be forced on Iceland together with laws that give precedence to the new non-whites over the traditional white Icelandic population and laws that confiscate all income from white Icelanders and shower it on non-white immigrants.  Then when white Icelanders can’t afford to have babies any more, because all their income will have been confiscated to pay for Negro babies, the low white birth rates will be thrown in their faces as proof non-white immigration was needed, because “whites aren’t reproducing,” and non-Jewish race-replacement advocates like The Monitor will blame it on insufficient Christianity, while good but slightly confused men like A Finn will accept that Iceland will have opened its own borders rather than having racially-incompatible immigration forced on it by men like Professor Mishkin who will never, don’t hold your breath waiting for this, force excessive incompatible immigration on Israel (I wonder why? ...... ).

Posted by Fred Scrooby on June 27, 2009, 03:37 PM | #

Excuse me, it was Torgrim’s post I was commenting on, not Gudmund’s.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)

captcha shown here

Next entry: USrael's Nuclear Bailout of AIG and Tata's Taj Terror

Previous entry: If Panarin is right, how might America divide?

image of the day

Existential Issues

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view)

Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view)

Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view)

GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view)

Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view)

qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view)

Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view)

Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view)

uh commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:52 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa