Jews shutting down debate.

I just saw this signature slogan at another site:

Consulting a Jew about WW-II is like consulting the CEO of Coca Cola, asking his opinion of Pepsi:  objectivity does not factor into the equation.

“Race” could be substituted for “WW-II” there.  A number of other things could as well.

Model it.

The common model of reciprocal altruism appears to be a variation of the guy with a lot full of trees. He has nine trees on his lot each with an assumed genetic value of two units. However, to garner the genetic benefit he must harvest the trees that day. The most he can do are four trees in a day. 4 trees x 2 units = 8 genetic units in total accrue to the owner. He decides to call his brother and friend to assist. He cuts three trees, his brother cuts three and the friend, a co-ethnic cuts three. The genetic benefit then is (3x2)(1) + (3x2)(1/2) + (3x2)(1/12?) = 10.4 genetic units. If he chooses his brother and a Mexican illegal to cut the trees and the Mexican is willing to give him two of the three trees he cuts, then (5x2)(1) + (3x2)(1/2) + (1x2)(0) = 13 genetic units accrue to the owner. The problem is the model doesn’t account for the reduction of EGI by 0.8 child equivalent through the presence of the Mexican.

Re: the Germans...in the Canadian or even the US model the threat to the Germans will be mitigated. Societies that are multi-racil versus bi-racial (like Fiji or Guyana where there is conflict between two relatively equal-sized ethnic groups) are more stable. Alliances must be formed with other out groups to undermine the “elite” German position. In Canada, there are Muslims (of all varieties), blacks, reds, browns, yellows and various white ethnic groups all in competition not only with the Anglo majority but with each other. It also allows the elites to limit freedoms because the ethnic groups are more afraid of each other than they are of the government, as Mill suggested.

If the elite behaviour is maladaptive (i.e there is a net genetic loss through reciprocal reciprocity toward Mexicans) and it certainly appears to be case, then why do they continue the behaviour? Either they are hypocrites, as Jared Taylor suggests, or they are purely altruistic. In either case it portends extinction. In ‘Origin’, Darwin proclaims that there has never been a species that evolved to serve another. He writes of the aphids that secrete a sweet nectar when stimulated by ants, but then suggests that it serves the aphids purpose as well. The only conclusion to draw is that white elites evolved an entirely unprecedented suicidal tendency in their undaunting pursuit of capital or that pure altruism is maladaptive. Neither of which makes sense.

“In Europe the Jews become like the zebra mussel in the Great Lakes:  they take over.  The counterbalancing checks and forces that acted on them and everyone else back home are suddenly gone and they run rampant in the new environment that has a different set of checks and balances that aren’t tuned to keeping them controled.”

Fred - your analogy comparing the Jews in Euro/White societies to an invasive and foreign species of plants/animals and the destructive effects which inevitably follow is excellent and works very well.

Thanks for sharing that.

A thread comment I just saw (link at the little cross-hatch at the end):

I believe it is of utmost importance that people are made aware of the fact that there are currently hundreds of brilliant scientists and writers in prison throughout Europe and Canada, for up to 25 YEARS, for asking questions about the “holocaust.” The reason they are serving such harsh sentences is because they have been labeled “Holocaust Deniers.” In some cases, the attorneys who defend the so-called “holocaust deniers” are also sentenced to prison, charged with the very same “crime”!!  [Scroob note:  because to defend their clients they have to make the case that there are legitimate questions to be raised about the standard version of the Holocaust, which is however forbidden to say, even on the part of a lawyer defending his client against ... you guessed it, against charges of claiming there are legitimate questions to be raised about the Holocaust.  So you can be charged but you aren’t allowed any defense and if your lawyer tries to defend you he’ll go to jail himself for the same crime of asking questions about the Holocaust.  Everyone got that?  It’s OK, go back and read it again, I’ll wait ......... 


(Exactly that happened to Sylvia Stoltz, Horst Mahler’s attorney, who is now in jail as a result, and Mahler due soon to return to jail for a different reason:  for giving the raised-arm Nazi salute and saying “Heil Hitler” in greeting a Jewish journalist who was interviewing him.  For that he’s going back to jail — at age 71 or so.  He just got out not long ago, after serving a term in prison for “crimes” equally ridiculous.) If the Jews wanted to make everyone in the world anti-Semitic they couldn’t do a better job than they’re doing right now, with these outrages of theirs.]

It’s pretty sad and pathetic that in today’s modern world you can march in the streets screaming that God does not exist, but you cannot question the Jews about the “holocaust” without going to prison.  Is that “democracy” and “freedom of speech”?  I don’t hardly think so!  [Scroob note:  No, of course it’s not “democracy” or “freedom of speech.” Obviously.  What it is is very simple:  post-’60s Jewish hegemony and the Jews are very harsh totalitarians when they acquire power.]

Comment by Michael Deaton — May 26, 2008 #

You don’t need Prof. Kevin MacDonald’s books to know who’s in control of our society — just look at the hierarchy of taboos, who’s getting arrested for what, and the way people are afraid of their own shadow when broaching certain topics of discussion. 

Look, let’s say you’re a tourist in Somalia.  You don’t say anything disrespectful about Mohammed.  Don’t ask why, you just don’t, OK?  Take my word for it.  It has to do with who controls the society over there. 

Or let’s say you’re a tourist in a remote mountain village of Sicily.  You don’t say anything disrespectful about any of the guy’s sisters in the village.  Just trust me on this one, OK — you just don’t.  Has a lot to do with who runs society there. 

Likewise, let’s say you’re in any European country.  You don’t wanna ask any questions about the Holocaust.  Don’t argue, you just don’t — same story:  it has to do with who runs society in Europe these days, OK?  What did you think, do I have to spell it out for you?  OK, yeah, without naming names it’s the same ones who ram MTV down teenagers throats over there instead of decent progamming.  And lots of other crap.  The same exact crowd.  Hey you catch on quick.  Now see you don’t forget it — if you wanna stay out jail, that is .....

I meant South African President Thabo Mbeki.

On the log entry’s topic of “Jews shutting down debate,” it’s now starting to trickle out how Zionist-Jewish TV network bosses shut down debate over Bush’s invasion of Iraq, propping up and enabling the neocon war criminals in the commission of their crimes against humanity ("starting aggressive wars” or even, I believe, merely “plotting to start them,” was one of the hanging offenses at the Nuremberg Trials, if memory serves).

(Hat tip.)

A propos of the log entry’s title:

1)

2)

(Hat tip.)

Some examples of shutting down debate, from Serge Trifkovic ( http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=606 )

(Hat tip:  http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/06/eu-for-everyone-except-europeans.html ):

In Finland, a blogger known as Tomashot, who operated an anti-immigration website, was fined 825 euros ($1,300) and ordered to close down the site.  The country’s criminal code (section 11, # 8) states that a person “who spreads statements . . . where a certain race, national, ethnic or religious group is threatened, defamed or insulted, shall be sentenced for ethnic agitation to a fine or to imprisonment of up to two years.” The authorities are currently working to increase the power of the “Anti-Discrimination Board” (Syrjintälautakunta) and to establish a “Super Ombudsman” to oversee all discrimination cases; [the Ombudsman] would also be able to penalize alleged offenders without a trial.  In addition, the authorities intend to make the internet service providers responsible for the “racist” content posted by their clients. But as a Finnish participant explained,

”No legal repression is needed when talking about certain things in a certain way is just not done.  The guardians of the public sphere take care of that, even if someone is naive enough to try.  In academia, write a research plan about studying ‘the challenges to democracy posed by changes in the cultural landscape due to the rise of fundamentalism and extremism’ — and you won’t get any funding from the state monopoly institutions.  Ask for help to study ‘our prejudices against the so-called terrorists’ or ‘the implicitly racist aspects of the gender equality discourse in the Third World’ — and your funding is guaranteed.  This happens everywhere, but Finland is specific because we don’t have second or third options.  So what remains to the not-PC-enough folks is the blogosphere — and that’s worrying the guardians, and they are trying to do something about it.”

[… In the U.K.,]

-- Robin Page, a television presenter, was arrested in 2002 for inciting racial hatred when he stated that people living in the countryside who supported fox hunting should be granted the same rights as blacks, gays and lesbians.

-- Fourteen-year-old schoolgirl Codie Stott was arrested over a “racial incident” in 2006, after she asked her teacher to be moved to a different discussion group where her fellow pupils actually spoke English. She was released without charge but only after spending several hours in the cells where her DNA was taken.

-- One of Britain’s top lawyers Robert Kilroy-Silk was not prosecuted for inciting racial hatred after he referred to Muslims as suicide bombers and limb amputators in a 2004 Independent newspaper article, but he did lose his job as a television show host.

-- The blogger Lionheart has been arrested and bailed on charges of inciting racial/religious hatred for detailing the activities of Muslim criminals in the Luton area.

-- A retired couple, Joe and Helen Roberts were warned by Lancashire police in 2005 that their request to display Christian literature alongside homosexual rights pamphlets at their local council offices was discriminatory and homophobic. (Lancashire police would have to wait a couple of years for the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill 2007 to be enacted in order to prosecute them.)

-- The use of anti-terrorism legislation has now spread to parents who lie about their post code in order to obtain a place at a desirable school for their children.

-- Anti-terrorism laws were invoked when Walter Wolfgang was detained by police in 2005. His crime: attempted re-entry to the Labour Party Conference, from which he had been physically ejected for heckling a speaker over the war in Iraq.

“This is the culture war in all its glory,” concludes Paul Weston. The myriad laws passed in recent years are simply there in order to stifle discussion, let alone dissent, in the ongoing war against indigenous European, Christian, heterosexual families. […]

Before the Lisbon Treaty is ratified early next year, the Europeans would be well advised to ponder a quote from Terry Davis, Secretary general of the Council of Europe, in the aftermath of the crackdown against the Vlaams Belang in Brussels last September:

”It is very important to remember that the freedom of assembly and expression can be restricted to protect the rights and freedoms of others, including the freedom of thought, conscience and religion.  This applies to everyone in Europe […].”

As I said at the end of my Vienna address, this is insane — and it is up to the millions of normal Europeans and their American cousins to stop such madness. The traitor class wants them to share its death wish, to self-annihilate as people […].

I don’t think it’s happening in all these places in such perfect synchronization entirely by itself.  I think it’s being orchestrated by Washington D.C.  What did the Eastern European communist countries (the Soviet “satellites,” remember that?) do during Moscow’s communist hegemony over them?  Simple — they did what Moscow wanted them to do.  Had Japan won the war and set up its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere what would countries such as Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, the Philippines, Manchukuo, Korea, and whatever Japanese-occupied puppets there were carved out of China in addition to Manchukuo — what would all of them do, had Japan won the war?  Easy:  whatever Japan wanted them to do.  Had Germany won the war and arranged Europe to its liking, what would European countries be doing now?  They’d be doing what Germany wanted, certainly not race-replacing themselves with Negroes. Well, the U.S. won the war, so put two and two together:  what are the European countries doing?  They’re doing what the U.S. wants, and what a certain ethnicity which achieved unchallenged hegemony over the U.S. in the 1960s wants.

I see WW II as the war fought to make the Eurosphere safe for government-enforced race-replacement.  The side having that as its agenda, its war aim, won and is implementing its agenda.  This race-replacement disease, this frenzy on the part of every Eurosphere country to get itself race-replaced, didn’t just spring up independently in each of these countries but has been not only orchestrated but imposed by D.C.  That’s my view.

It’s true what people say, that WW II was the only good war of the last century.  Yes, most definitely.  Unfortunately, the good side lost.

Fought by whom?  What was Appeasement, then?  A policy adopted by Chamberlain to avoid race-replacement?

You have to account for the enormous and humiliating efforts of the British, particularly, to avoid war in 1938.  WW2 did not begin as a political war against some regnant blot of nationalist feeling on the European ideological landscape.  It began as a response against the German land-grab.  What it became is annother matter.  But with lebensraum it would have been an entirely different matter, and the old nations of eastand central Europe might never have become soviet satellites.

“What it became is annother matter.” (—GW)

That’s a good point.  I’ll readily concede that.  That war may have begun with one set of aims in mind and been hijacked in mid-course by interests who, wresting the tiller out of the hands of the original steersmen, re-set the course in a whole new direction.  A certain ethnic group, one that was deeply involved in that war on this side of the Atlantic, happens to be good at doing that, as witness their transformation of what we used to have in this country, a veritable paradise on earth known as the U.S.A., to what we now have thanks to them, a “proposition nation,” or “Negrotopia, The Final Jewish Vengeance.” It’s the behavior of viruses, getting into the cell’s nuclear DNA and redirecting it to manufacture a whole new set of proteins, ones of no use to the infected cell but useful to the virus.

So yes, I’ll concede that point.

Here are somemore incites from Hitler: “Today the right of citizenship, as mentioned above, is primarily achieved by birth within the borders of a state.  In this, race and nationality play no role whatever.  A Negro, who formerly lived in the German protectorates and now has residency in Germany, gives birth to a German citizen in the person of his child.  Likewise every Jew or Polish, African or Asiatic can be declared a German citizen without further ado.

I know that people do not like to hear all this; but anything more thoughless, more hare-brained than our present-day citizenship laws scarcely exists.”

Sounds like good sense to me.

Dear Mr Scrooby,

I read your comments for a long time. Thanks for articulating what many people know to be true

but can’t say either because they lack the facilities or the fortitude. I have been a victim of their discrimination

myself but I don’t know how you can oppose big bucks without educating the masses. And the masses have

seduced and brainwashed by hollywood. Popular opinon is a greater influence than moral imperatives.

It’s a small consolation to know that once they have succeded in destroying the social constraints of the ethics

of Christianity (hypocracy notwithstanding) that Satan whom they serve will enjoy taking them to hell along with

their prostitutes and slaves.

I am sorry to admit that I too was duped by the social movement of the 1960s that they engineered. The only

excuse I have is youthful foolishness and a host of problems. I realize now that I was an unwitting participant

in my own destruction. I would do most anything to redeem myself. And it grieves me to see the nation as a

whole following blindly down that same road.

A price must be payed for all sins. I can only pray Christ will pick up the tab for me. But it is certain that I will

continue to pay for those mistakes for the remainder of my natural life. If “righteousness exalteth a nation”,

what does unrighteousness do? The apparent relish with which they appear to consume their ill gotten gains

can’t last forever. Surely they will have to pay for the evil they bring into this world as much as I must.

But I consider myself blest above them that the Lord has chosen to chastise me for my errors in order to open

my eyes before it was too late. As gauling as they can be, I think maybe they should be pitied if they remain

blind to the inevitable outcome of refusing to obey the gospel. “They think they are rich but they are poor”.

The most I hope for in this world is to leave it without losing my soul. Let them continue to sin. If they continue

in the present trend , evil goy will realize what’s in his own worldly interest. Even if he’s as stupid as they think

he is, they don’t lack shrewdess and I know many that are as much “ a brood of vipers” as they are.

Tom

Generalized Set…The Fact about the Jews
It is extremely refreshing to hear folks actually acknowledging the FACT about the present day Jewish power brokers who control America’s media, government, financial institutions and probably the water we drink. These Jews are in fact Ashkenazi Jews and have no tangible relationship to those acreages called Palestine and Israel. History has shown us time and time again the Jewish agenda and the masterful conjuring tricks of the Zionists who have used lies, deceit and obfuscation to feed their greedy little palettes. –
No surprises there. I also want to take this opportunity for the first time to disclose something to you all. This is something that results from years of study and although it has some fairly subjective leanings, it is essentially rooted in anthropological objectivity. The phenomenon I want to discuss is called “GENERALIZED SET” It is a term which my partners and colleagues alike have been using for almost 25 years but due to the censorship of mainstream media, it has been difficult to disseminate this terminology to a wider populace. I implore you all to begin using this expression when referring to Jews.....So WHAT is “GENERALIZED SET”? Well, we all know that all races have certain physical characteristics. And in all races and cultures ( except one) we find beauty in the features whether that person is a negro, an Indian, Celt, white Russian, Anglo Saxon, Asian, in fact anywhere on the planet you will find physical differences earmarked only by their own personal and dignified beauty.
The exception of course, is the Jew. Have you ever really looked closely at Jews? Do you notice that there is an ugliness about all of them? However this isn’t the kind of ugliness which the mainstream media has always sectionalized and marginalized through Hollywood such as the guy with the big nose or the fat lady who brings the house down with every utterance. No, not at all. The Jewish ugliness stems firstly from the eyes, or more precisely the “SET” of the eyes which can often be so close together that you couldn’t fit a blade of grass between them or eyes distanced widely to give a slightly deformed mongoloid look. It is this positioning of the eye more often than not coupled with the shifty disposition of the eye itself, which accounts for approximately 60% of “GENERALISED SET.”
The eyes of the Tyke also contain an intensely festering, calculating gaze, which betrays even the most mixed Jew to his “Goyim” audience. Secondly, we turn to the nose. It has always been a byline that the Jews have big noses even though some Celts and those from other white races also have large high bridged noses. There is a typical Ashkenazi nose which is larger than average, often hooked or having a hooked appearance around the nostrils and can be seen in notable Yids like Larry King and Alan Greenspan ( two Tykes whom I might add), contain almost 100% “GENERALISED SET”!! However, once again it is not the shape of the nose that gives the game away, rather it is the placement of the proboscis on the face in relation to the other facial features, a placement which always looks makeshift- not correct, as though made not by the hands of GOD but one of Santa’s little helpers the morning after a “bender.”
Coupled with the patchwork eyes, the nose on the Yid form a formidable part of the phenomenon known to the Initiates, as “GENERALISED SET”, - a proportion intrinsic to the filthy Yid alone!! NEXT TIME YOU WATCH --news from the war torn Middle East, compare the heads of say a Palestinian, or Arab with that of a Jew. Arabs can have hooked noses, Arabs can have intense dark eyes, but they have no “GENERALISED SET”. Their features are grounded with some sense natural proportion. Yes, there are I suppose, good looking and not so good looking Arabs, as in every race, if we loosely defer to Hollywood stereotypes but again, I emphasize to you all, no set of physical features common to every race of peoples on this planet, can come within a thousand miles of that root of all true ugliness—the generalized set on every stinking, conniving Yid. Let’s continue on our Tyke facial tour. THE MOUTH!! This is a highly potent tool of the Yid. From this hideous facial chasm coupled with his penchant for writing “gobble de gook,” the Yid has been able to dupe and beguile all other races throughout history. The Yid has actually been “Talking in Tongues” since the day of his hideous inception. So is there little wonder, that the mouth of the Yid also has a disproportionate element and one that it also integral to the makings of “GENERLALISED SET.” The mouth of the Yid is often so disproportionately wide and crooked, that the Yid seems to grapple deeply with the simple act of smiling. Notice that when any Yid tries to smile, it is only the mouth that changes shape. In other words, there is little reinforcement of the intention from the other facial characteristics. The eyes always remain inert. It is a reptilian smile- most probably representing reptilian intentions!! The Yid mouth is also given, more often than not, to slobbering. This could be due partly to physiognomic deformity, or perhaps by the arrogant, dismissive demeanor of the perpetrator. Either way, the Yid mouth is an embodiment of universal ugliness surpassed only by the filth which is jettisoned from it.
We now arrive at the ears. Take a good look at Ex New York Governor, Eliot Spitzer. Notice the outwardly protruding pointy ears. The ears of the Yid are often unusually large…a daunting observation and one that continually eludes Anthropologists, mainly because Yids are so set in their ways, that they have little time or motivation to listen to others and therefore have little to no use for hearing accessories. The pointy, elf like characteristic is almost ubiquitous on the ears of Yids. Again, Greenspan, King, and Spitzer…100% Ashkenazi Yid…100% “GENERALIZED SET” !!!!

THE SKULL. The generalized skull shape of the average Yid is also an abomination. The skull shape more often than not exacerbates the sense of “GENERALISED SET”. Particularly around the eye and upper cheek cavities. In fact, some scholars have even surmised that the Yid skull may have extra terrestrial origins. This is an area that may be worthy of further erudition although due to the hazy nature of so much antique history, it is perhaps only through the most notable archaeological endeavours that we might be able to learn more about the exact origins of “GENERALIZED SET”
I must concede that it is inevitable that I will receive intense criticism for comments during this essay. Criticism is always welcome however, your denial of my right to have an opinion, is not!!  For skeptics, simply consider this. For two thousand years, the Yid has been indoctrinated to “go fourth and multiply,” to mix with other races and acclimatize to other cultures whilst always preserving that part of him which is essentially Tyke. “GENERALISED SET” shows in no uncertain terms, the potency of the Yid gene. It matters not whether a Yid is a German Yid, A British Yid, and American Yid or a Negro Yid. Because behind the fronted race, there is always some generalized set. Even a white man, who is one eighth Yid, will bear some of the trappings of generalized set no matter how slight or ostensibly subtle.
Finally, hope you all found my essay on “GENERALISED SET” interesting. I will be posting some more essays soon, most notably on the Grass roots foundation “Yid Watch” an organization dedicated to the destruction of the “Tyke Empire” for the benefit of all peoples of the world!!

Yours faithfully

Nemesis