Life in the Kwa
An article not written by me that deserves wide distribution.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3409
Postcard from Zinnlandia
From the desk of Takuan Seiyo on Fri, 2008-07-11 22:37
I am on the MAX Red Line light rail car going from downtown Portland to the Airport. Some things socialists do better. Among them are public transportation, recycling, French poetry readings, yoga, coffee, artisan food and arthouse cinema. Would it that the counterscale were not so much more loaded.
Two hefty women in Birkenstocks and Nordic sweaters sit on the bench in front of me. They are either academics or lesbians or both. Portland is a babe magnet for this kind of babes.
One of them, silver bangles jangling, is showing a souvenir purchase to the other. It’s a garden gnome, complete with a red cap and a Walt Disney tunic stretched taut over a rotund belly. The face, though, is less jovial than one expects on a gnome. An etched inscription on the base reads, “Howard Zinn.”
We are leaving Zinnlandia, after all – that great land of the Pacific Northwest, rich in good wine, including zinfandel, and other bounties of nature. Howard Zinn and his doppelgänger, Noam Chomsky, are to the coastal zones of this blessed land what St. Patrick is to the Emerald Isle. And, like Finlandia, Jutlandia and Hollandia, Zinnlandia too has much Northern European DNA.
Zinnlandia is in Amerikka – that racist, capitalist land of injustice, sexism, specieism, lookism, theism, militarism and homophobia. As a material and cultural Marxist, and skillful propagandist, Zinn – a master of sieving American history for its worst nuggets – is the perfect avatar for the self-flagellating white inhabitant of this land.
A Zinnlandian I met on this trip, a WASP physician endowed with the best education much money can buy, told me that he does not celebrate July 4th because the Declaration of Independence had been written by a slave owner and signed by other slave owners. He was just as hotly critical of the “racism” of Americans in dealing with the growing Muslim immigrant minority. The conversation unfolded over a bottle of Oregon Vino Pinko, with the likeness of a notorious Cuban mass murderer on the label.
Besides the pervasive lefty obtuseness as to the true nature of Che Guevara, there is one central paradox in this Zinnlandian, as there is in all of them. In the case of the good doctor, he donates his time and money to schools and clinics in Tanzania, where he has visited several times. And Tanzania, particularly Zanzibar, is a living memorial to the horrors of slave trafficking by Moslem Arabs and black Africans—far larger and crueler than the slave trade that soiled the New World, preceding it by a thousand years, evident still in the 1960s, and ended only due to Western insistence.
So we have here a mind twisted into self-contradicting loops designed to screen out everything good about “us” and everything bad about “the other.” This particular dhimmi-in-training has managed not only to block out all the greatness and goodness of the American Founding Fathers, and the merits of the nation that they launched, but also to overlook that his favorite country, Tanzania, exemplifies the horrors he purports to abhor and that, unlike America, it has hardly any countervailing merits.
Behavioral psychology has names for various information perception and analysis biases, but at least fifteen of those would have to be added to encompass the depth and width of the Zinnlandian’s – let’s not beat around the bush – craziness. Take, among others, the Bias Blind Spot, add some Omission Bias and Selective Perception, leaven with white racial guilt propaganda. Whip that into a mixture of Belief Bias, Selective Memory, Bandwagon Effect, Déformation Professionnelle and Disconfirmation Bias. Pour the mixture into a pie shell made of Neglect of Probability, My Side Bias, Optimism Bias and Positive Outcome Bias, and bake for 30 years in an oven designed specifically by mainstream media and the educational system to make that kind of dough rise. Voilà!
Barack Hussein Obama drew a crowd of 74,000 people in Portland, which amounts to about 13.5% of the population in this third whitest city in America. It’s doubtful one fourth that number would have come, had his name been Bartholomew Henry Oglethorpe and the title of his book were Dreams from My Mother: A Story of Race and Inheritance.
And now I am heading out of this second key city of Zinnlandia, the first one being Seattle. The train’s computer announces each stop first in English, then in Spanish. I catch a few familiar words: puerta, izquierdia, por favor, la ligna roja, aeropuerto. I feel like my mother did when the Soviets invaded her hometown in 1939 and within one week of entry changed its name and all its public and store signs into Russian written in Cyrillic letters that no one could read.
Except here it’s the land of the voluntarily submitted, the natural dhimmis. There are no conquerors; not yet. Just like in England or Holland, except the same kind of First World people are submitting to a different kind of Third World people: Mestizo peons here, Moslem hoi polloi there. The submission includes constant panic lest one be accused of the high crime of “racism,” leading to acts of conspicuous politically correct piety as ubiquitous as the jambon serrano sides that hang by custom in the front of Spanish bars since the days when a publican had better proved to Inquisition agents, and quickly, that he was not a secret Judaizer.
La Raza, a racist, irredentist, Mexican fifth column organization is a valued component of Zinnlandia. Its sponsors in these parts include megacorporations like Boeing, Lilly and Washington Mutual. It is feted by Euro-American mayors and by the entire education industry, e.g. here.
To get a better idea of what La Raza (The Race) is, one might read a short expose here. Or, one might jump from Spanish to German and say aloud, with the proper Hochdeutsch accent, die Rasse. And in pandering to this organization, and to its sister agents of America’s decomposition, not only the Pacific Northwest but the entire sectors of American government, politics, media, education and commerce trip over each other in the contest who will be the best Zinnlandian, or to use another term, quisling.
In the week starting July 12th, the two U.S. presidential nominees made their pilgrimage to kneel at the preferred race’s altar at the annual convention of La Raza, just as soon as they were done trolling for Mexican voters at the LULAC convention. About their participation in the latter, the blog Powerline stated:
The LULAC event signals a new era in political pandering. And since the group on the receiving end of the pandering is a predominantly low income, low-skill one, the pandering will ultimately focus on income transfer, however it may be dressed-up.
That receiving end – tens of millions of it, with some 14 millions more to be admitted officially soon after whichever new U.S. president is sworn in – brings with it a tradition of state control of the economy, militant labor, backwardness, clientism, massive corruption, rampant lawlessness, narco-terrorism and rigging of the electoral system. America is voluntarily transforming itself into a dysfunctional, socialist Third World country, just as EU is transforming itself into a totalitarian empire straight out of Blade Runner, complete with a seditious replicant caste.
On the basis of the cui bono principle, it helps to note that at The Race’s shinding, Messrs. McCain and Obama were joined by two more localized but notorious collaborators of the invasion forces, Antonio Villaraigosa, Mayor of Los Angeles, and Jerry Sanders, Mayor of San Diego. All underwritten by The Coca-Cola Company, GEICO, General Mills, TOYOTA, Wachovia Corporation, Amtrak, Ford Motor Company, U.S. Postal Service, and Washington Mutual. All happy to pay obeisance to the passel of dignitaries from the Hispanization industry – mostly Mexicans in nationality or allegiance, pushing their tribe’s interests at the expense of the larger, docile, post-tribal society that has lost its defensive reflexes.
But I am digressing. Of the 26 riders in my light rail car, three seem Latino. One, who looks illegal to me, sleeps sprawled over a fat, natural blonde. The other two are more established, judging from their new shaves and clothes and their $150 Timberland boots.
This in contrast to the rest of the passengers, all lower middle class whites, half of whom wear flip-flops. Such flimsy footwear on people who will soon be shuffling in long security lines and dragging heavy suitcases through crowded airports bespeaks of thoughtless insouciance. These people cannot imagine a hard heel stepping on their exposed toes, let alone a soft “diversity,” voluntarily imported, rising to stomp on their faces, one day.
Starting right here, in this car. “An assault by five teenagers on a North Portland MAX train this week revived worries about mass transit safety since several high-profile incidents last winter,” reads the opening paragraph in The Oregonian’s news today. The story goes on, “Teenage boys and girls punched, used racial epithets and stole the purse of a 28-year-old Vancouver woman who was taking her first-ever MAX ride early Monday evening. The woman, who is white, had just had a conversation with the teens, who are African American and were harassing another woman”.
It’s uncharacteristic for the progressive press of this progressive town – just what are they progressing toward? – to disclose the racial identity of violent perps, since this could dent the very foundation on which Zinnlandia and all postmodern Western civilization are built on: that all people, and all racial, ethnic, gender and national groups of people, are equal in their proclivities, abilities and merits, and are equally deserving of uncritical acceptance. They just have different “narratives,” you see. But it’s interesting how gingerly the racial identity is mentioned, when it is, with what curious, for a newspaper, waste of words. The story could have opened, after all, “An assault by five black teenagers on a North Portland MAX train this week… etc”.
As to the “several high-profile incidents last winter,” the story is less forthcoming. The reader is reminded that “a 16-year-old boy” was just sentenced to 91/2 years in prison for pounding a 71 year-old man with a baseball bat at another stop of this rail system. The account does not mention that the “boy’s” name was Abel Chavez-Garcia and his smashing the old (and white) man, Laurie Lee Chilcote, to pulp was also accompanied by racial taunts. One has to fish through another article to find out about the hoodlum that he is an illegal alien. And it takes yet another, much earlier article to find out that Mr. Chilcote, whom the savage “Hispanic” punk has gifted with, among others, partial paralysis, double vision, dimmed hearing and a speech impediment is so brainwashed, good Oregonian that he is, that the only question he voiced after the attack was “what would make a teenager swing a baseball bat at an elderly man.” (1)
The story then goes on to remind the reader that “Weeks after the beating, a 19-year-old man was stabbed in the chest at the Rockwood Transit Center, and on Christmas Eve a woman was groped at a MAX stop in Gresham.” Curious about the identity of the stabber and the groper I do a little research on my laptop, soon after arriving at the Departures lounge of the PDX Airport terminal.
The groper – and it was a full-fledged assault – was a Mario Santiago-Montelongo. More extensive research, later, reveals that Santiago-Montelongo, who got 22 months in prison for this assault, is a Mexican illegal immigrant (2).
I cannot find anything more about the stabber, though the report implies that the police are in possession of such information (3). But a paragraph mentioning this crime also informs that four days after this stabbing “Thaymon Earl Watson, 19, was sentenced to 14 years in prison for stabbing to death a 19-year-old in December 2006 at a Gresham transit station.” So we have here another activist minority, though this one homegrown.
In the course of my 15-minute visit with Google, I also find out that on January 08, 2008 a Mr. Mynor Guerra Perez, 29, tried to force a woman into the trunk of an automobile and stabbed her in the stomach and left chest. The stabbing caused a lockdown at three Beaverton schools. Also on the same date, in the same supersprawling Latino magnet town, a 46-year-old woman was assaulted in her bed by a night invader. Although the man has fled, his sketch, based on the woman’s description, leaves little doubt as to the wonders of the great mosaic of our strength in diversity.
A few months earlier, a 40-year-old was stabbed in the stomach on a crowded bus of the same transit system. Although it’s certain that witness testimony was recorded as to the race of the stabber, the news report prefers to avoid a “sensitive subject,” but still tips off the knowing by noting that the perp was wearing a white do-rag.
The same television station reports of a fight on another TriMet bus: “When police showed up, they saw several people running from the bus and heard several shots fired.” There must have been something else the police noted about the fleeing perps, but it’s not disclosed.
And in Hillsboro, “police are looking for two teenagers who attacked a Gresham man near a MAX station last week. The teens reportedly followed him and beat him with their fists, rocks and chunks of concrete. The suspects are described as teen males, 16 or 17 years old.” No, they must have been described otherwise too. And it’s far from irrelevant.
Also in Hillsboro, a “16- and 15-year-old” were arrested for attacking two boys near a MAX station. One of the victims had a fractured skull after being hit on the head with a hammer. Could there have been a common denominator for the attackers other then their teen age?
It seems endless. “Sixteen-year-old Joe Crane is afraid to ride Portland’s MAX light-rail. Four years ago he was attacked on a MAX platform near the Lloyd Center. And recently he was jumped at night by three men, who pulled him off the MAX, kicked him in the head and stole his wallet, cash and cell phone.” At the end of the story, there is a reference to surveillance camera footage “as pictured above.” What’s “pictured above” are three young black men pouncing on Joe Crane like beasts of prey on a cornered doe.
The article goes on to blame the transit police for its insufficient presence. Such arguments are now ubiquitous in the Portland media’s editorials, demanding more funding, more TV cameras, better lighting, better inter-agency cooperation. Everything is discussed, everything is noted – except for the 10-ton rhinoceros wearing a tutu and, balanced on his horn, spinning pirouettes right in the middle of the room. For what is required is a better populace, not better lighting. And to have a better populace, its rotten part must be clearly identified, watched, and punished for every crime committed, to the full extent of the law. Punished and cordoned off from society, rather then left to the “compassionate” ministrations of the social saboteurs proliferating among the ruling, clueless and cowardly Western elites.
And inasmuch as young blacks and ‘Hispanics’ in America produce a widely disproportionate number of criminals, a normal people would demand of its quisling leaders that police and security forces employ crime profiling – including by race, gender, nationality and religion – and that Hispanic criminals be headed off a lot more effectively at the border, rather than courted by US presidential contenders once they have jumped the fence.
But we are still in denial relative to even the first part of the solution, identification. The media are either staying clear of the issue or engaging in its active camouflage. Mute white politicians, police chiefs and judges are being attacked vociferously for the disproportionate number of blacks in prison, as though that, per se, were proof of pervasive white racism rather than of pervasive black criminality.
America’s presumptive president, BH Obama, and all black political leaders and TV talking heads distort every possible crime statistic, with no national politician, even from the allegedly “conservative” wing of the Republican Party, putting them on the spot for it. The black demagogues, and their enablers such as Mr. Obama, shift blame from black criminals onto white “racism,” faults in the law and its application, society etc. The racial “healing” and coming together Mr. Obama sells on the stump is a veiled promise that inconvenient truths will no longer be tolerated, and a trillion dollars more will be dumped down the drain for a “cure” of the willfully imaginary social “causes” of black and brown crime.
For black and Hispanic crime is not the result of poverty or of racism. One is safe walking among the poor in Thailand, the disfranchised Ainu in Japan, or the downtrodden Jews still living among Moslems. Until the crazies took over Islam again, for the nth time in history, a white person could walk – and this author did walk– through the poorest sections of Arab cities without fearing for one’s life. One may sometimes suffer violence at the hands of unemployable young sociopaths in white-only precincts of Birmingham or Bratislava, but murder and serial rape are not a feature of everyday life there.
Everyday, in the U.S., in Great Britain and elsewhere in the West, there are headlines attesting to barbarity, reflexive violence, lack of any moral restraints and grave societal danger posed by large numbers of blacks, Mexicans and Central Americans, Albanians and other Moslem immigrants living among people of Euro-Christian ancestry. When one reads a headline, “Pack of cigarettes ignites 200-person ruckus at Fort Myers gas station,” it no longer matters whether the race is mentioned or the photos shown, because everyone knows. Or does he?
Two young white men in Dallas are locking up their fledgling recording studio. The men and the studio are devoted to Christian causes. Two young black men drive up and ask for a cigarette. A conversation develops that lasts 30 minutes. With this man, who then pulls out a gun and executes the white innocents for a take of $2.
For white Westerners born in the last 50 years are all honorary Zinnlandians. They have grown up indoctrinated to squash their own survival impulses, to be ashamed for preferring their own people and culture, to admire the “authentic” and “noble” savage.
I should not like to single out Portland, Oregon for scorn or ridicule. This type of paralyzing cowardice or suicidal stupidity exists in every American, Western European, Canadian and Australian city I have visited over the past thirty years.
In Portland, the “youth” often just beat you up. In the City of Brotherly Love, aka Killadelphia, the brothers shoot on sight. In Malmö they rape your sister and then wait in ambush for the ambulance. In Epinay-sur-Seine they set a car on fire and then, armed with brass knuckles and iron bars, wait in ambush for the police. France alone has 751 Zones Urbaines Sensibles, and yet its entire fancy elite keep singing in unison of the glories of Third World Moslem immigration. The chronicle of the West’s shame is thicker than a phone book.
A recent London Times article discusses the alarming plague of knife murders in Great Britain, of course without discussing the demographics of the perpetrators (4).
Among the dozens of anxious comments, one, Cris, states, “The black elephant is in the room. 43% of all violent crime is committed by the Afro-Caribbean population. One part of the answer (not the whole of it) is to deport each an every immigrant caught carrying a knife.”
To which another commenter, Piers, retorts, “Typical racist BNP facism; what about the 57% of non-black people who commit violent crime- will u deport them?”
That’s how the cultural left silences the voices of reason and objectivity: blind frothing at the mouth with words like “fascism” and “racism” spraying out with the spittle. For what matters is not which group commits more crimes but how that crime rate relates to the group’s percentage of the population.
What matters is this: Blacks are 3.5% of the British population. Now, when you perceive that 43% of violent crime in Great Britain is committed by members of a demographic group comprising 3.5% of the population, then you are on to something.
In San Francisco, Honduran crack-dealing hoodlums are treated to a city-paid flight back to Honduras with a carte blanche to return, in order to shield them, in this ‘sanctuary city,’ from federal deportation. “The strategy is appropriate, (chief of the Juvenile Probation Department) Siffermann said, because deporting young offenders would doom them from ever becoming productive residents of the United States.”
The boot-wearing young Latinos I saw on my train ride to the Portland Airport are constitutionally unable to indulge in such self-erasing idiocy. Shorter, darker, more primitive and far less foolish, they flow in naturally to fill the vacuum inhabited by the white flip-floppers.
Perhaps the time has come to give more attention to the existential AIDS that has disabled the immune system of the West. There is nothing intrinsically worse about Moroccans, Mexicans or Memphis blacks than there was in 1950. What has changed is the cultural immune system of the Euro-ethnics around the world. The Moroccan in 1950 did not live in Amsterdam, and the Mexican did not in Portland. They wouldn’t and couldn’t. The black was in Memphis then and now, but in 1950 he had the church if he was a good man, and long-term, harsh prison if he was not. Nowadays such institutions grate on the Zinnlandian sensibility.
Opportunistic infections do not penetrate but decaying organisms. Non-discrimination as the central organizing principle of Western society does to a body politic what AIDS does to a living body.
For now, we can rest easy knowing that virtue is winning. “Welcoming people of color makes a city,” coos The Oregonian in a Nov.17, 2007 sidebar. Particularly if they are 19, at a tribal stage of arrested development, and handy with sharp implements.
Footnotes
(1) “MAX security ‘too late for me’,” The Oregonian, November 13, 2007
(2) “Man gets 22 months for MAX assault,” The Oregonian, February 20, 2008.
(3) “Outcry follows MAX stabbing,” The Oregonian, December 1, 2007.
(4) Such reticence is usually missing when revolting crimes are committed by whites. The media, for instance, mentioned persistently that the suspects in the recent murder of two French students in London are white. Entirely proper too, except comparable indications ought to be given also when criminals are not white.
Posted by Robert Reis on Saturday, July 12, 2008 at 03:50 AM in Race realism
Comments (133) | Tell a friend
Comments:
Posted by treehugger on July 12, 2008, 09:23 AM | #
I almost choked on my double-whip white chocolate frappuchino a couple of times there. That’s some damned good writing and it’s right on! Too bad the idiots running this city don’t see it the same way X-( That poor helpless, 71 year old man riding the Max line, that was recently beaten within an inch of his life by a fourteen year old Mexican kid with a baseball bat, should remind us all that things just aint right in this, and other cities run by guilt-ridden white people. The irony is that the more the city officials try to placate minorities, the angrier and more mob-like they get. But count on them to keep trying.
Posted by Guessedworker on July 12, 2008, 10:14 AM | #
The author of that BJ piece has this bio on the blog:-
Takuan Seiyo was born in Communist Eastern Europe and socialized there and then in Switzerland, France and elsewhere. He received his university education and was naturalized in the United States, but interest in some aspects of the Japanese culture took him eventually to Japan, where he now lives. He describes himself as bi-racial, tri-national, quadri-degreed, quinti-lingual and sexto-ethnic. As to religious conviction, he buys directly from the wholesaler while remaining a cultural Christian. Mr. Seiyo’s pen name is both his Japanese nickname that means “Western pickled radish,” and a symbolic way to honor one of his heroes, the 17th century Japanese Zen monk, Takuan Soho.
© Copyright 2005-2008 - Society for the Advancemen
There’s nothing like clarity in dealing with race. And that’s nothing like clarity.
Posted by Diamed on July 12, 2008, 11:22 AM | #
This writer is a genius. I loved his articles on japan’s contrast with the west as well. Of course he’s right here as well.
It’s weird, in that, all the fundamental questions have been answered. We know what went wrong, we know who did it to us, we know why it went wrong, we know what to do to solve it. There is nothing left to talk about. This is why the endless proof that we’re right, and talking about how right we are, and why we should do the right thing, just becomes tiresome. American Renaissance was published in 1990. It’s now nearly 2009. After all the publications showing the color of crime, the IQ connection to race, etc, we’re worse off than when we started.
What does this mean? What has all the talking done? Will there ever be any action? Can there ever be any action?
How about this for a topic: Given we race realists will only remain 1% of the population of the country, what can we do to conquer the country and/or secede from it in the next 40 years before our genocide is assured? I don’t think we’re ever going to convince the herd. They’re utterly useless.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 02:00 PM | #
The Zinnlandians are clueless but not the people behind the scenes keeping things in Zinnlandia in lockdown through control of the communications media and entertainment industry, selection of political candidates of both major parties, etc.: far from clueless, they know what they’re doing (there’s no way for them not to, obviously), namely changing the race of the country on purpose for no reason other than they want to, meaning they must intensely dislike the place’s original race because you don’t go around changing a place’s race on purpose, especially given all the violence and destruction that entails in the case of going from white to non-white, on a whim.
Since in general you don’t hate your own race racially, this tells us the culprits’ ringleaders must not view themselves as white or the same kind of white as the population targeted, which is consistent wth the fact, as I see matters based on tons of evidence, that the ringleaders are the Jews, who, we are learning more and more, do not so view themselves (i.e., as white or the same kind of white as the population targeted).
James Kalb, Lawrence Auster, Prof. Paul Gottfried, Constantin von Hoffmeister, Steve Sailer, and oh yes, the Israeli water engineer “J” who sometimes posts here, are wrong.
Yes, as James Bowery phrased it, the valuable posts by Alex place an upper bound on Jewish culpability in this matter (assuming the writer or editor of the 1870 piece in question wasn’t Jewish or put up to it by Jews, but even if he was we already know that Prof. MacDonald places an upper bound on Jewish culpability by his observation that Jews are a necessary but not a sufficient condition, and of course common sense tells us the same thing, as these sorts of changes happen through the forging of alliances all of whose members may be crucial for success). But as Captainchaos implied in the thread underneath Alex’s recent log entry, that upper bound placed on Jewish culpability still leaves plenty of room to encompass the ringleader role.
Publication of this article is a huge advance for BrusselsJournal.com: after timidly dipping its toe in the water, first with FJ’s mention some months ago of “white,” next with Laughland’s recent explicit publication of the word “race” in its proper sense and context, that blog now comes out and explicitly refers to race as the problem that it is.
Race in fact is THE central problem, on a whole different plane of significance from such typical BJ.com fare as insufficient Eurosphere Christianity or excessive Eurosphere Islamisation. Compared to race-replacement both of those pale into insignificance as problems, being what GW and JWH have taught us to think of as “proximate” as opposed to the other, race-replacement, which is “ultimate.” There’s no comparison: if compared, if one had to choose the more important of the two, the one will have comparatively virtually infinite final importance, the other comparatively virutally zero final importance.
The next step for BJ.com and all blogs not yet doing it (which includes InvertedWorld) will be to start explicitly naming race-replacement’s NEC ("non-European Caucasian") ringleaders.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 02:02 PM | #
Diamed, your questions are legitimate and, of course, important. I for one don’t have time just at the moment to attempt to address them. Maybe I’ll come back to them later.
Posted by GT on July 12, 2008, 02:07 PM | #
Given we race realists will only remain 1% of the population of the country, what can we do to conquer the country and/or secede from it in the next 40 years before our genocide is assured? I don’t think we’re ever going to convince the herd. They’re utterly useless.
Two things you can do right now:
1. Talk to family and friends.
2. Get out and meet people.
Be circumspect, tactful, and conservative about what, when, and how you say it. If in doubt, don’t.
On meeting people
How much time do I have?
How much money do I want to invest?
Do I like spending time indoors or outdoors?
What are my skills?
What can I teach?
Where can I assist?
History Buffs
The Historical Re-enactment Web
Search engine and directory of the global historical reenactment community. Contains links to reenactment societies, trader details and other information.
http://www.histrenact.co.uk/
The Directorie
The Web’s most comprehensive and reliable list of Renaissance and medieval battle reenactments, encampments, feasts, pageants, and living history displays throughout the year.
http://www.faires.com/
The Society for Creative Anachronism
The SCA is an international organization dedicated to researching and re-creating the arts and skills of pre-17th-century Europe.
http://www.sca.org/
Firearm Training
NRA–Certified Training Instructor
Rifle, pistol, shotgun, reloading, etc. Providing education and training in the safe and proper use of firearms.
http://www.nrahq.org/education/training/instructor.asp
Hunter Safety Education
Today’s Hunter
The only place on the Web where you can study the official hunting safety course developed specifically for your state government’s hunting and wildlife agency.
http://www.hunter-ed.com/
Contact your local state fish and game department for instructor certification information
http://www.nrahq.org/hunting/statefishgame.asp
California Department of Fish & Game Hunter Education Instructors
The backbone of California’s hunter education training effort is the many dedicated volunteer instructors, who give their time and energy to the program. California instructors have trained well over one million hunters since the start of the program. Training in the principles of firearm safety, hunter ethics and sportsmanship, wildlife conservation and management, and hunter-landowner relations are the keys for a safe hunting future.
http://www.dfg.ca.gov/huntered/instructors.aspx
Basic/Intermediate/Advanced Archery Certification
USA Archery
An organization of certified archery instructors and coaches.
http://www.worldarcherycenter.com/
Junior Olympic Archery Development (JOAD)
Activities range from beginner instruction and outreach to world championship competition.
http://www.usaarcheryjoad.org/
Low, Medium, & High-Powered Rocketry
National Association of Rocketry
Supporting rocket flyers for 50 years.
http://www.nar.org/
Tripoli
A non-profit organization dedicated to the advancement and operation of amateur high power rocketry.
http://www.tripoli.org/
Rocketry.org
An online amateur experimental rocketry resource.
http://www.rocketry.org/
Radio-Controlled Aircraft
International Miniature Aircraft Association (IMAA)
For the purpose of fostering and advancing the operation of large scale radio controlled model aircraft in a setting where informality and safety of operations prevail.
http://www.fly-imaa.org/
Academy of Model Aeronautics
Bringing aircraft modelers together.
http://www.modelaircraft.org/
Scouting
Boy Scouts of America
http://www.scouting.org/
Girl Scouts of America
http://www.girlscouts.org/
Amateur Radio
Amateur Radio Relay League (ARRL)
Providing the broadest and most powerful wireless communications capability available to any private citizen anywhere in the world.
http://www.arrl.org/
The volunteer instructor support program
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/ead/instructor/
ARRL resources for licensing instruction
http://www.arrl.org/es/instructor-resources/
Outdoor Camps, Backpacking, Orienteering
The U.S. Orienteering Federation
The sport of navigation with map and compass.
http://www.us.orienteering.org/
Outdoor Adventures
Our objective overall is to build the largest, most comprehensive outdoor adventure, learning and information site on the World Wide Web.
http://www.myoan.net/index.html
American Hiking Society
At the forefront protecting the nation’s trails and the hiking experience.
http://www.americanhiking.org/
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 02:07 PM | #
By the way, good title for the entry: it’s good to call things what they are, call them by their right name, and “the ‘Kwa” is what the United States has become.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 02:56 PM | #
The discussion in this Lothrop Stoddard excerpt, in regard to the illegitimateness, the lowness in a sense, the unfairness, the unrightness, the wrongness, of the ways in which Asiatics outcompete and overcome Euro workingmen in Euro workingmen’s own lands once introduced into them, has bearing on the ways in which Jews in general (who, remember, are also Asiatics), once introduced into Euro lands, outcompete and overcome Euros in ways not exclusively fair, legitimate, elevated, upright because of Euro hesitation born of training, education, natural reluctance, feeling for the fellow man, respect for fairness and propriety, for tradition, for fellow Christians, for blood, and so on, to engage in certain ways of doing things non-Euro Asiatic Jews may engage in with less hesitation. As with the Chinaman, these differences are real, they count, and they call into question the legitimacy of some aspects of competition.
Posted by GT on July 12, 2008, 03:07 PM | #
The activities and organizations in my previous post are “Implicitly White,” some more so than others. Implicitly White behavior is a positive means of achieving exclusionary results in private organizations benefiting from 501c tax status. Non-Europids generally leave. That doesn’t mean you are free to run your mouth, however. Europid members are at various stages of racial consciousness. It is good to have a confident, but low-profile approach. More about this later.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 04:19 PM | #
From the How Come With Certain Things It’s Always Déjà-Vu All Over Again? department:
After telling Americans earlier this week to have their children learn Spanish, Sen. Barack Obama admitted yesterday, “I don’t speak a foreign language.” Upon learning this news, New York Times op-edster Roger Cohen, who has written dozens of columns about how Barack Obama is the perfect postnational cosmopolite Citizen of the World, [...]
Typo: that should have been Roger Oglethorpe. Those degenerate WASPs, big into the postnational cosmopolite Citizen of the World thing — is there no end to it? ....
No? Not Oglethorpe? Oh that’s right, it’s Roger Morimoto. Japs, you know, never forgive us for sending Barry Manilow and Michael Bolton on tour over there ....
Not ... Morimoto? OK, let me think ... Got it, it was Roger Goolagong — Abo anti-white feeling has been really festering ever since “Tie Me Kangaroo Down” made it into the pop charts.
Not Goolagong? Wait, I haven’t had my coffee yet, it’s coming to me, it was Roger Dull Knife, damn Cheyennes, Custer’s Last Stand and the gambling casinos aren’t enough for the greedy bastards ....
“Not Dull Knife”??? OK OK it’ll come to me, just hang on ...............
And the Jew York Ti New York Times isn’t part of the Jewish press in this country. Just pointing that out, in case anyone gets funny ideas about being Jewish-owned and publishing all those “postnational cosmopolite Citizen of the World” puff pieces by Roger Dull Knife. The ... Mormons own it, I think. No? OK, right, just kidding, it’s the ... Branch Davidians? Yeah David Koresh bought it ... Not them? ... GOT IT! The Myanmar-Americans! They own it! .... No, wait, I’ll get it ............... But it’s NOT Jewish owned, I know that for certain .........
Posted by Lurker on July 12, 2008, 04:21 PM | #
No links right now but I would give a mention in dispatches to railway and aircraft preservation organisations. They tend to be voluntary, co-operative enterprises and taking part one might pick up some skills too, indoors & outdoors. Im writing from a UK perspective but I would be very surprised to find much difference elsewhere. And yes implicitly white.
A random sample:
http://www.festrail.me.uk/cgi-bin/whr/emAlbum.cgi?c=show_thumbs;p=Santa%20Trains
Just look at the pictures, who is missing?
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 04:35 PM | #
A JWH log entry with relevance to commenter Diamed’s questions, above.
Posted by .357 (Dave Johns) on July 12, 2008, 04:55 PM | #
“A JWH log entry with relevance to commenter Diamed’s questions, above.”
And don’t overlook this:-
http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/05/balkanization-strategy-introduction.html
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 05:58 PM | #
JWH’s balkanisation strategy is beautiful partly because it’s a win-win: we should be doing it anyway, regardless of whether or not it has the potential to accelerate balkanization. If it accelerates balkanisation, so much the better: that’ll be icing on the cake. The things he recommends we do (in the entry linked by 357 just above) are things we should be doing anyway. The whole concept is a can’t-lose proposition for our side.
Posted by GT on July 12, 2008, 06:47 PM | #
No links right now but I would give a mention in dispatches to railway and aircraft preservation organisations. They tend to be voluntary, co-operative enterprises and taking part one might pick up some skills too, indoors & outdoors. Im writing from a UK perspective but I would be very surprised to find much difference elsewhere. And yes implicitly white.
You are absolutely right: Aircraft and rail preservation societies are implicitly White. In fact, as one who worked in the ground side of aviation until 1989, I’d say the membership is probably the most “right wing” of all groups listed in my previous posts – that is, old right (paleoconservative). Although this might suggest an elderly age group I’d bet that a significant number are 30-40-50ish White men with Aircraft and Powerplant (A&P), Avionics, Pilot, Air Traffic Control, Crash Crew, and various Ground Support Equipment and Electronics backgrounds.
Posted by Guessedworker on July 12, 2008, 06:48 PM | #
We have, of course, looked at balkanisation and the issue raised by Diamed before.
Posted by GT on July 12, 2008, 08:25 PM | #
We have, of course, looked at balkanisation and the issue raised by Diamed before.
I wish I had been aware of this post. It requires fleshing out, which no man can do by himself. Let’s keep it front and center.
JWH’s balkanisation strategy is beautiful partly because it’s a win-win: we should be doing it anyway, regardless of whether or not it has the potential to accelerate balkanization.
Yes it is beautiful. Warfare is asymmetrical. Politics is low intensity warfare. Balkanization is the first step in establishing asymmetry.
We are denied the media. Successful balkanization requires that we engage others locally through positive action – good deeds with a personal touch. Socially, the beneficiaries of one’s good deeds are the first line of defense in the event of an enemy counterattack. And they will counterattack. Their modus operandi is to attack one’s children and women.
Deeds speak louder than words. They teach! They inspire emulation in others and invoke fatherly concern for those others in one’s self. An important loop – feedback – is created. Marines call the mechanics of this process “leadership by example.” No Internet turkey can lead by example. All he can do is present information and suggest something or another. Genuine leadership is a positive, personal, ground-based phenomenon. It begins with one’s self.
Posted by Guessedworker on July 12, 2008, 08:47 PM | #
GT,
That e-mail with my sketchings for a blog page on planning a white ethnostate was, in fact, sent to JWH. As with the long thread that followed it, the ideas were not much debated. Maybe they weren’t good ideas - and there is no reason why they should be because I’m not an American, I don’t know the real issues, and I was only chucking a few thoughts down to get a fruitful conversation started.
Obviously I failed. If you think you and maguire and others can carry something better forward, you will have my full cooperation should it be required.
Posted by Bo on July 12, 2008, 08:56 PM | #
Speaking of things to do, go ahead and address your local Human Relations Committee with your own complaint, file complaints of your own with city & county officials, and by all means speak out of your demographic voice (As a European American, I...” or “As a native-born Englishmen with many ancestors who gave their lives for England, I...” or “As a member of the diverse white American peoples, I...”
Speaking out of the appropriate voice helps one find the right words. Unfortunately, many white Americans want to speak out of their American voice, but that’s just silly now.
No need to whine or claim victim status. Claim the right of self-designation in all environments.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 09:16 PM | #
What about the boycott? If, for example, word began to spread among whites to boycott the businesses of Jews who are leading the fight to exterminate us, such as the Disney Company under Michael Eisner, one of the most aggressive promoters of genocide of whites through race-replacement (or perhaps just boycott “the Jews” in general), some among our oppressors might take notice. What if, let’s say, word got out among whites, and spread nationwide by word-of-mouth, that Michael Eisner’s Jewish-oriented Disney Company (Jewish-oriented in the sense they’re aggressively promoting the ascendancy of non-whites over whites in this country, a goal nearly universally loved among diaspora Jews) was one of the biggest supporters of our oppression, and therefore to hit back by refusing to patronize any Disney amusement park, see or rent any Disney film production, or watch the Disney Channel on cable TV (and by calling their cable company to demand the Disney Channel be discontinued in their service package)? A total boycott of Eisner’s Jewish Disney Company. Do the same to other Jewish companies and businesses that are active participants in the Jewish drive to race-replace Euros.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 12, 2008, 09:26 PM | #
“Multiculturalism” and “multiracialism” are always code words for race-replacement of Euros. Any party, company, or business that says it’s promoting either of those things is saying in code that it’s aggressively race-replacing Euros, aiming for a Euroless society, and is a fair target for being boycotted by every aware white person and white family in the country (in the world, actually). Michael Eisner’s Jewish Disney Company would be one of the top ones on that list, among many others of course.
Posted by GT on July 12, 2008, 10:24 PM | #
GW:
Maybe they weren’t good ideas
They are good ideas. They weren’t debated because the present nationalist zeitgeist in America is foundationally conservative. Foundational conservatism is a collection of character traits which I consider to be feminine by way of expression. In other words it looks to central, authoritative solutions which minimize personal risk and responsibility. It is fearful, not proactive. It reacts, it doesn’t lead. Its sight is short, not long. It is neurotic. It is a whore for attention from the wrong sort of people. It rewards dysfunction and marginality with “respect,” and disdains the productive. It is very likely controlled by the enemy it claims to “fight.” If that is true (and I would almost bet my life that it is), then American “nationalism” is nothing more than a pressure-relief valve, just as “mainstream conservatism” is and has been a pressure-relief valve for the past 50 years.
If you think you and maguire and others can carry something better forward, you will have my full cooperation should it be required.
Thanks much. I will remember it.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 13, 2008, 01:15 AM | #
“Multiculturalism” and “multiracialism” are always code words for race-replacement of Euros. (—from my comment)
“Diversity” is another term for it of course, and here‘s one inevitable side-effect (one among dozens equally nightmarish) of this Jewish-conceived government-imposed systematic criminality and psychopathology: innocent people get subjected to the most insanely irrational and cruel routine police procedures mandated by distant (generally located in D.C.) bureaucratic automatons following orders originating ultimately, if you trace them up the chain of command, with Jewish New World Order Euro-hating race-replacing globalists like Chertoff. Why not blame Euro-race New World Order Euro-hating race-replacing globalists? There are those too of course but the ultimate instigators and ringleaders aren’t Euros: a man doesn’t normally take a hammer and pound nails into his own head; neither does a race. It takes another man or another race to perpetrate that act on a victim.
Posted by Robert Reis on July 13, 2008, 04:24 AM | #
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080423193420AAaoVEm
Resolved QuestionShow me another »
Amy Biehl, Melissa McLaughlin, Tiffany Nicole Long, Patricia Stansfield, Heather Muller?
Other than being American and female what do they have in common?
2 months ago
Report Abuse
by Madame Minestrone Member since:
July 07, 2006
Total points:
11232 (Level 6)
Add to My Contacts
Block User
Best Answer - Chosen by Asker
Sadly, there were all murdered by black men either here in this country or in Africa.
2 months ago
Report Abuse
Asker’s Rating: Asker’s Comment: Almost right. Ten-year-old Tiffany Nicole Long was raped by black males, but she was killed when a black female rammed a broom handle through her body, crushing her little heart. Is this what you are searching for?Rating: Good Answer Rating: Bad Answer
0 stars - mark this as Interesting! Who found this interesting?
Be the first person to mark this question as interesting!
Email
Comment (0)
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 13, 2008, 05:47 AM | #
From the More Vibrant Tales from Zinnlandia department:
It was almost funny, when a left-leaning German journalist recently confessed that she had moved from West Berlin to East Berlin (for various reasons West Berlin has many foreigners and few skinheads, whereas in East Berlin it is the opposite). She embraced multiculti with all her heart, yet the conditions at school for her daughter just became unbearable, and forced her to seek out the protection of the skinheads against the foreigners by moving to East Berlin. She recognized all this very well, and was feeling terribly guilty for betraying her ideals, yet the circumstances forced her to do so.
Or, how about this one: a “well-known liberal blogger” walking in a vibrant D.C. neighborhood the other night took three bullets as he was chased down by some vibrant guys there. (And yes, Schadenfreude is spelled with a capital S for those who may need to acknowledge that word in their diaries right about now ... .) Look at the first post in the comments thread on that:
Section 8 [housing], which back in the day (remember Jack Kemp folks) seemed like a good idea, is a disaster. I thought moving a few of the terminal underclass out among the middle class would get the insitutional poor to start copping the folkaways of productive, contributing citizens. I could not have been more wrong. A study done by two U. of Memphis professors that has been cited by some blogs show a very depressing reality: where section 8 houses are, crime follows. We have merely outsourced crimes to older suburbs within metropolitan counties (which is another reason not to live in a county with a metropolitian form of government that can implement social programs county-wide without any input from the local citizenry). And they wonder why people are willing to pay the gas money to live 20 minutes outside of town, beyond county lines. Personal safety for you and your offspring, thats why.
I think section 8 is beloved by the real-estate/developer/finance/builder industries becasue after 20% of the homes on your street go section 8, and you have to hear booming car radios night after night and witness block parties in your formerly quite-child friendly, pedestrian friendly neighborhood, THEY KNOW you will move. You will sell your house and not make much money off of it, sacrificing some of the equity you would have expected a few years back to buy a cookie-cutter-illegal-alien-built-McHouse that is designed to start falling apart after 30 years further out in suburbia with a new mortgage. Everybody in the real-estate scam gets paid. They call it “churn.” They are making money off the productive by terrorizing them with underclass scum. That’s how it is in America in 2008. You do a good job of raising your little ones and keep your daughter from picking up any influences that will have her wind up on the pole as a profession now ...
Then we have the Jewish press promoting .... oops, sorry, make that the (fill in the blank) _______ press promoting, well, promoting the typical sort of crap the incredibly irritating (fill in the blank) _______ press never stops promoting then gets indignant when others notice it never stops promoting it and calls them anti-(fill in the blank) ______ :
An Interpreter Speaking Up for Migrants is the title of a tendentious NY Times piece about a Spanish language legal interpreter who decided that he had to “speak up” for “migrants” — otherwise known as criminal aliens. Naturally the NY Times depicts him as some kind of hero, when most Americans would — one hopes — consider him as aiding and abetting the Latino takeover of the U.S.
Now, the (fill in the blank) ______ have long wanted the Latino takeover of the U.S., both culturally and racially, especially racially. Ashley Montagu (real name Israel something-or-other, Israel Ehrenburg I think) says, in his 1950 UNESCO Statement on Race [a document so Jewish in its neurotic obsession with “racism,” an obsession no other ethnicity on the planet suffers from, it reads like it could have been lifted straight out of the Protocols of the Elders of (fill in the blank) _______ ], on page 4, how much white countries badly need to become like ... you guessed it, like Brazil! (I bet knowing that his real name was Israel Ehrenburg nearly threw you off). Here’s the money quote from that 1950 Jewish-written document, a document that has “neurotic Jewish obsession with racism” written all over it:
Many inquiries have already been undertaken into interracial conflicts and the factors that produce them. The time has now come for us to consider the societies which have in large measure succeeded in resolving antagonisms by overriding racial differences. Thus, the General Conference of Unesco in Florence recommended for the 1951 programme of the Organization a study of racial relations in Brazil. This great republic has a civilization which has been developed by the direct contributions of different races. And it suffers less than other nations from the effects of those prejudices which are at the root of so many vexatious and cruel measures in countries of similar ethnic composition. We are as yet ill-informed about the factors which brought about such a favourable and, in many ways, exemplary situation. But in the present state of the social sciences, general speculations no longer suffice. We must have specialists make searching inquiries in the field. We must learn from them exactly why and how social, psychological and economic factors have contributed in varying degrees to make possible the harmony which exists in Brazil. Then the results of their inquiries can be set forth in publications in order to stimulate those who are still struggling elsewhere to introduce more peaceable and happier inter-racial relations.
It’s funny the way Ehrenberg ... oops, I meant Montagu ... goes on about Brazil in that money quote, considering what Mangan had to say recently about, by coincidence, that very same subject, Brazil (and guys with Jewish-sounding names getting it all wrong):
Interesting here is the mixture of truth, falsehood, and obtuseness. Salmon even uses the word “vibrant” with a straight face, as if that’s a good thing. Also that “justly celebrated for racial and ethnic diversity” carries lots of ideological baggage. Who’s celebrating? Brazil is a mess, with ethnic conflict and high crime, which would be just another Third World nation absent the commodity boom. [...If] it didn’t have those whites running the show, where would it be? Brazil remains a better country to immigrate to than, say, Zimbabwe, but worse than say, Australia or Singapore. Hmmm, wonder what causative factor is at work?
Looks like UNESCO’s Jews have their work cut out for them convincing whites their countries need to become more like Brazil but hey, their co-ethnics have got that contingency covered with the 1965 Immigration law and the Diversity Lottery, so not to worry, you can take the U.S.’s Brazilianisation to the bank — it’s a done deal.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 13, 2008, 03:15 PM | #
Got an e-mail from someone “picking apart” my last comment:
a document so Jewish in its neurotic obsession with “racism,” an obsession no other ethnicity on the planet suffers from, (—from my comment)
This guy asks, what about the Asians, the Blacks, plenty of others who have the same obsession with “racism.” Yes but they were all taught to have that obsession by the Eurosphere’s Jews. Go back to their countries of origin in the Far East or Africa and you’ll find, trust me on this, no obsession with “racism.” In those places it’s perfectly natural to hold your race to be the best and to view neighboring races as sub-human — so natural and accepted, in fact, that any other view is inconceivable and they look in wide-eyed disbelief at the West’s racial suicide (not understanding it’s 95% the Jews committing genocide and only 5% Euros actually committing racial suicide). “Racism” as a concept was invented and pushed by the Eurosphere’s Jews. That’s it, the whole scoop on “racism.” They invented it because they’re obsessed with 1) being excluded by Euro society when they’re conducting themselves honorably and with 2) the possibility of indignation, shunning, and reprisals when seen by Euros to be conducting themselves dishonorably, and want to 3) preventively disarm both, especially 4) indignation, shunning, and reprisals when they conduct themselves dishonorably.
Period. Full stop. End of story. Case closed. That’s all “racism” is or ever was, a Jewish invention in a misguided effort at ethnic preventive self-protection.
“Racism” was wielded as a major propaganda weapon by Bolshevism because Jews invented that too (Jews invented Bolshevik communism, a twisted, evil, unworkable form of the more normal Proudhon-type indigenous Euro-race socialism).
Deal with it.
Looks like UNESCO’s Jews have their work cut out for them convincing whites their countries need to become more like Brazil (—from my comment)
This e-mail found fault with my words “UNESCO’s Jews” to refer to “a single Jew, Montagu,” writing the UNESCO position paper on race.
Well, look at that extremely odd, extremely obsessed (with “racism"), extremely politicized document‘s list of authors (page 11):
The original statement was drafted at Unesco House, Paris, by the following experts :
Professor Ernest Beaglehole, New Zealand
Professor Juan Comas, Mexico
Professor L. A. Costa Pinto, Brazil
Professor Franklin Frazier, United States
Professor Morris Ginsberg, United Kingdom
Dr. Humayun Kabir, India
Professor Claude Levi-Strauss, France
Professor Ashley Montagu, United States (Rapporteur)
You have three Jews, one New Zealander who’s not exactly a major figure (where are major figures like Carleton Coon, Henry Garrett, and tons of other respected major academics in this field who could’ve participated but clearly were not wanted?), and that’s it as far as Eurosphere Caucasians go: the rest are a Negro, a Subcon, a Mexican, and — surprise, surprise! — a Brazilian!
Prof. Lévi-Strauss, still alive at nearly a hundred and a giant in the field of sociology, is Jewish and (who would’ve guessed this next bit!) a race-replacement advocate (who became a giant for the same reason Franz Boas, Ashley Montagu, Gunnar Myrdal, Margaret Mead, Francis Fukuyama, and tons of others did: the Jews at every level they influence, be it academia, the communications media, the world of politics, private organisations and the big foundations, book publishing, entertainment, and so on, hype those who deny race, are anti-racist, or are pro-race-replacement: you do any of that, and seventy-five percent of your career success is already pre-assured thanks to aggressive Jewish backing every step of the way).
Prof. Montagu was, of course, a lifelong Jewish race-denier and race-replacement advocate and advocate of, quite literally (he came right out and said it, made no bones about it) the racial Brazilianization of Euro-race countries.
As for Prof. Ginsburg, the Wikipedia entry on him begins in a way that hardly leaves a doubt about the particular ethnic world view in which he had been deeply steeped his entire formative years:
Morris Ginsberg (May 14, 1889 - August 31, 1970) was a UK sociologist. [...] Ginsberg helped draft the UNESCO 1950 statement titled The Race Question. [...]
He was born in Kelmy, a small town of two or three thousand, in the Province of Kovno, at that time part of Russia, now in Lithuania. He was given an education considered good according to the standards adopted by a small, isolated and intensely religious little community. His knowledge of Hebrew and religious principles was adequate but of secular learning he was absolutely ignorant.
At the age of thirteen he was sent away from home to Telz and then to Slobodka, where were situated two of the well known Yeshivot or academies for the study of Talmud. There he remained until the age of 15 and studied rabbinical lore with great zeal, the value of such studies resembling more than anything else the studies of the Schoolmen in the Middle Ages. Their value as a mental training and discipline is undoubtedly great.
About this time there was a revival of Hebrew literature and an attempt was made by many Jewish writers to introduce the learning of the Western peoples to the Jews of Russia. It was in this way that he was brought into contact with European ideas and inspired with a great desire for secular knowledge.
His father had previously emigrated to Liverpool, England, and established a tobacco factory, and at the age of 15 he rejoined him together with his mother and sisters. He made up his mind to study, but at the time he was ignorant of any European language except Yiddish and, although he knew a great deal about religious matters and Hebrew lore, he knew nothing whatever of even the rudiments of secular education.
He worked in his father’s business and could only study in his spare time. He succeeded, however, in preparing for the Matriculation Examination of the University of London which he passed in January 1907.
When this document’s authors were the three Jews, Montagu, Ginsburg, and Lévi-Strauss, and the only other white man was a New Zealander of modest reputation rather than a single one of the big names who could’ve been invited to contribute but weren’t, I don’t think I’m being too hyperbolic in referring to “UNESCO’s Jews,” especially when one considers all the evidence pointing to the likelihood the Jews were running the whole UNESCO/United Nations show behind the scenes and steering it in a direction favorable to what are in general Jewish pet projects such as race-denial, race-mixing, race-replacement, etc.
This person’s e-mail found fault with additional details in my comment, which I won’t bother to address because answering them is long and his objections are all niggling, beside the point, hair-splitting, and without merit.
Posted by Stanley on July 13, 2008, 05:58 PM | #
As much as I respect Fred Scrooby, his 7/12/08 comment at 9:26 PM, went half as far as it could go:
“Multiculturalism” and “multi-
racialism” are always code
words for race-replacement
of Euros.
And then Fred Scrooby added 7/13/08 at 1:15 AM:
“Diversity” is another term
for it of course…
Scrooby is completely correct in defining multiculturalism, multiracialism, and diversity as used by the MSM and anti-Euros as code words. But to say that they are “always code words for race-replacement of Euros” or nightmarish police procedures (among dozens of equally nightmarish outcomes) is a narrow view.
It is correct that the three terms are coded references, partly because the real meaning of multiculturalism, multiracialism, and diversity are such cloudy concepts, meaning almost what anyone wants them to mean. For example, multiculturalism morphs into multiracialism, and multiracialism morphs into balkanization, and balkanization morphs into white, black, bronze, and yellow nationalism.
So any really hardened white nationalist would see multiculturalism as an opportunity to establish white institutions within the white segment of multiculturalism, and then to expand that into explicit racial claims to a territory, thence into secession or autonomy, and thence into true nationhood. If white nationalism really means deporting every person of color from the continental USA or the English portion of the United Kingdom, then that’s a different story.
But multiculturalism and multiracialism are clearly gateways ("code words") for some version of white nationalism.
Just because they are tools of the MSM and anti-Euros does not mean we cannot make them our own code words and, in fact, Resisting Defamation has made diversity its own code word. While the MSM and anti-Euros apparently mean diversity as “racial diversity,” we have emphasized European-origin peoples’ ethnic diversity, national origin diversity, indigenous original language diversity, cultural diversity, historical diversity, you name it.
The beauty of picking up an adversary’s code word and making it your own is much to be desired. If gays can relish “faggot” and “gay” and “queer,” long since terms of opprobrium, how much easier will it be for us to take back the three words brandished by the MSM and anti-Euros?
Posted by .357 (Dave Johns) on July 13, 2008, 07:08 PM | #
“Just because they are tools of the MSM and anti-Euros does not mean we cannot make them our own...”
Excellent point, Stanley. It springs forth the idea that white preservationists (i.e., normal white people), should employ the use of the Frankfort School’s method of ‘Critical Theory’ in reverse. We should deconstruct “Zinnlandianism.” Then at every appropriate opportunity, openly criticize and ridicule anything or everything about it. It proved exceedingly successful for the left, so I can’t see why it couldn’t be of great benefit to our cause.
Posted by torgrim on July 13, 2008, 08:15 PM | #
More Vibrant tales from Zinnlandia…
“I think sec 8 is beloved by the real estate/developer/finance/builder industries…
THEY KNOW you will move. You will sell your home and not make much money off of it, sacrificing some of the equity you would expected a few years back, to buy a cookie-cutter-illegal-alien-built McHouse that is designed to start falling apart after 30 years. Everybody inthe real-estate scam gets paid. They call it, “Churn”. They are making money off the productive by terrorizing them with the underclass scum. That’s how it is in America in 2008.”
I watched this in the Portland Oregon area and it’s sister city, across the Columbia River, Vancouver, in southern Washington State. The more rural town, of Vancouver Washington was the ‘White Flight’, destination from the ever growing Left encroachment,.. of Portland Politicos.
The 40 acre farms surrounding Vancouver were bulldozed, trees flattened, land flattened, cul-de-sac heaven sprang up. The Hollywood type salesman in the first built,.. McHouse, $1000 suit, BMW car, diamond ring, gold chain, well fed, selling these sub-standard houses. Substandard due to the fact that they were being built in a Douglas Fir rainforest using California standards. You see, if you build with Douglas Fir, in a Douglas Fir rainforest everything from insects to fungus just loves to eat Douglas Fir. So these homes will not last even 30 years....but they just built it out, until they ran out of land and left the housing market with 12,000 empty units.
I am not writing about the present, no this was back around 1998.
The productive part of this equation, the carpenter/tradesmen, were nothing like the Salesman, NO,… white guy,(at that time anyway), driving not BMW’s, or sporting gold chains, no they were skinny,and haggard, driving vehicles that were 15 years old and constantly under pressure, to produce more and more for less money.
I should go back and see how the “Churn” is working,...about time in this cycle, it’s been 10 years. Let’s see now, I bet I can find the sec.8 housing by just listening as I drive by.....listening for that obnoxious bass beat, or maybe I can just use my ofactory senses, just love the smell of curry in the morning.
Posted by Fr. John on July 13, 2008, 10:02 PM | #
“The beauty of picking up an adversary’s code word and making it your own is much to be desired. If gays can relish “faggot” and “gay” and “queer,” long since terms of opprobrium, how much easier will it be for us to take back the three words brandished by the MSM and anti-Euros?”
The fact that sodomites and ‘lez-beans’ (has-been women) have appropriated these terms, and now call each other this (and such is nothing new; my former gay friends were just as bitchy and catty, in using these terms with their ‘friends’ thirty or more years ago, as they are today, for they always have- for they hate each other, as one lioness hates other lionesses whenever they smell fresh ‘meat’) But such actions are done, NOT because these terms have been ‘neutralized.’
Au contraire. Nowadays, elementary school children use ‘gay’ as a put-down, somewhat like one once heard, ‘that’s so lame,’ they now say ‘that’s so GAY!’
No, the reason sodomites now find such words ‘trendy,’ is that their addictive perversion has sunk so low into their collective psyche, they (like the Jews’ and THEIR vile, perverse sexual appetites) need ever more debasing terms, social ‘kicks’ (i.e., ‘gay marriage’) to give them the ‘high’ they used to experience, just in being a bit flamboyant; it is as if the shock value must constantly be increased, because nowadays, just being part of what they once perceived as an ‘in-group’ (when ‘Will and Grace’ first hit the airwaves some 10 or more years ago) doesn’t ‘cut it’ anymore.
Like a crack addict, the only thing that satiates a sodomite, is MORE. Thus their psychological illness. In ‘wearing their wickedness like a cloak,’ even in the face of their (and the Jews’) co-opting of the APA in 1973 to remove the label ‘disease’ from the clinical psychosis that they exhibit, they still want to act like a spoiled arrested development 12 year old, ‘freaking mom and dad out’. Trouble is, they are now the age their ‘moms and dads’ were, and the reality of their death sentence (via AIDS, or just a jaded, lonely, cheerless existence as an ‘old queen’) is too much to bear with them.
As NARTH has been at pains to show, these puppies are SICK.
And sinners....
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 13, 2008, 10:15 PM | #
Stanley makes excellent points. (Stan, you and Bo need to remember to include a link to your excellent web-site, ResistingDefamation.org, every time you post a comment or a “guest-blogger” log entry, as there are always new readers who aren’t familiar with you guys.)
357 makes an excellent point also: use the other side’s own weapons against them. When Saul Alinsky, a Jewish pro-Bolshevik Christian-hating, Euro-hating pro-genocide communist activist of the 1930s-40s-50s-60s was advising the left wing activists during the 1960s he told them to use Christianity against Christendom (i.e., use Christianity against whites, against the Eurosphere, which is Christendom, and which Jews like Saul Alinsky see as their age-old ethnoracial enemy), in the sense of forcing Christendom, that is, forcing whites, or the Euro peoples, to destroy themselves in trying to live up to certain impossible expectations only the naïve think Christianity holds Christians to, but which the left would insist they be held to, such as supposed heroic, self-abnegating white christian obligations toward the poor and disadvantaged of other races, and so forth.
Those on our side such as myself who apportion a good share of blame for what’s going on to the Jews can use the same strategy in reverse, holding the Jews to the same destructive demands they insist on holding us to in the name of non-discrimination, etc.
Thus calls I have made for the white women who are paired with Negro or Mexican men in all these Jewish TV and movie productions to be identified clearly as Jewish women (either by saying it in the dialogue, or putting a Star of David around their necks, or giving them unmistakably New York Jewish mannerisms and accents and so on), and in view of the destructive demands Jews make on our Euro societies that our societies be racially and culturally mixed, and racial or cultural homogeneity declared forbidden as the worst sin imaginable in Jewish eyes, we are certainly within our rights to start demanding the same of their country, Israel. I mean, I like the Jews and want Jewish women not to miss out on all the benefits of miscegenation with Negro men which Jews are constantly telling us about, and I like Israel and do not want it to miss out on all the advantages to accrue to any society that eschews racial and cultural homogeneity and embarks on multiracialism, multiculturalism, and open borders.
I want to see more racially-mixed mulatto Jewish babies, more racially-mixed Jewish couples, and a far less homogeneous Israel, both culturally and racially.
How do we know all this would be great for Jewish women and the state of Israel? Because the diaspora Jews are constantly telling us about the fanatistic benefits to be had from it all. Since they’re so nice to us in telling us, I want to see them enjoy the benefits too. In fact, I insist on it. I won’t take no for an answer.
Posted by GT on July 14, 2008, 12:15 PM | #
So any really hardened white nationalist would see multiculturalism as an opportunity to establish white institutions within the white segment of multiculturalism, and then to expand that into explicit racial claims to a territory, thence into secession or autonomy, and thence into true nationhood. If white nationalism really means deporting every person of color from the continental USA or the English portion of the United Kingdom, then that’s a different story.
Europids are like Brad Pitt’s daughter, Shiloh. We haven’t a say in the matter of our parents – a neurotic mother and mangina ‘father’ – bringing alien humanoids into the home. It’s a done deal. We can get uppity about it, but the consequence of that would be a thorough slap-down from mom as our acquiescent ‘father’ stands in the background. Very little help from biological siblings can be expected for they are younger, blessed with the same characteristics our neurotic mother despises, and far more helpless when it comes to fending off her attacks. All we can do is stake out our territory, be it the bed or bedroom, and “celebrate” diversity as we bide the time preparing for our majority and a battle over the inheritance. Part of that preparation involves developing the necessary bonds with younger siblings. We must show them how to survive, prosper, grow stronger, and become independent by cooperating with us under the nose of the easy money ‘anti-racist’ bitch that runs the family. Yes, in our multiracial ‘household’ the language of multiculturalism and the celebration of (human) biodiversity is something we can use.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 14, 2008, 01:46 PM | #
The excellent author of the Zinnlandia article replies to a poster in the comments thread:
Submitted by Takuan Seiyo on Mon, 2008-07-14 06:56.
The comments by jstanley01 are ripe with the same fungus that infests the neocon precints of L[ittle]G[reen]F[ootballs] and other putatively “conservative” organs. The personal attack in jstanley01‘s post does not merit a response, but some substantive points do. Hence:
1. The melting pot is gone. Dead for 30 years now.
2. The Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, even the Gospels that are cited by many left-Christians, are not a suicide pact. Anyone who knows anything about Jefferson, Washington, even Lincoln, who imagines that they envisioned, or would approve of, America with Somali towns in North Carolina, Jamaat al-Fuqra centers in Virginia, and the California drivers’ test in 23 languages, is out of his mind.
3. The problem with US/UK/EU incarcerartion rates is not that they reflect blind justice. The problem is that the left takes those rates, in which non-whites are heavily overepresented, as a prima facie proof of the racism of Western society. The left bludgeons civil society with its rants about racism and discrimination — and these incarceration rates are perhaps the most important weapon in its propaganda arsenal. No one in position of power, Sheriff Joe Arpaio being a notable exception, has the guts to respond to those rants. Presidents, senators, judges, chiefs of police — they just duck for cover and ease on law enforcement to make sure that too many nonwhites in the penal system won’t spoil the establishment’s PC credentials.
4. No one should underestimate the wrath of the so-called “right” at people who dare to challenge racial pieites, or who suggest that the U.S. is something more than just an extension of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. It’s enough to read George W. Bush’s speeches, or accounts of John McCain’s rants against his English-only or No-Amnesty Senate colleagues, or Charles Johnson’s posts at LGF. jstanley01 is just a minor hick speck but he belongs in that — sorry to use a European word — tableau.
Indeed, pro-race-replacement “conservatives,” such as Charles Johnson (what an asshole that guy is!) of LittleGreenFootballs, David Cameron of the British Tory Party, President Bush, and Juan McInsane are every bit as much our mortal enemies as Bill & Hillary, Noël Ignatiev, Alon Ziv, and the Jew York Ti the New York Times.
Posted by q on July 14, 2008, 03:24 PM | #
The author, who writes under his
Japanese nickname, TAKUAN
SEIYO [Western pickled rad-
ish] is a multi-ethnic, naturalized
American, boot-strapped from
severe under-privilege. While
refusing to expiate for the imputed
misdeeds of American forbears he
did not have, he acknowledges the
possibility of his familial ances-
tors’ complicity in the genocide
of the Amalek and the Jebusites;
in the wholesale persecution of
Jews in Europe in the 1.600 years
preceding 1933; in the 600 years
of subjugation of the Lithuanians
and the Ukrainians; in any of the
innumerable acts of cruelty to foe
and self through most of Japan’s
history; and in the denial of voting
rights to Swiss women until 1971.
His e-mail address is
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 14, 2008, 04:35 PM | #
“and in the denial of voting rights to Swiss women until 1971.” (—q)
Positively THE WORST thing the Swiss ever did was give women the right to vote in 1972. It’s national suicide: women don’t vote to preserve race or nation because they can’t see race or nation as realities, or even as concepts — and to the extent women ever do manage, some of them, to vaguely perceive race or nation they dislike them. They don’t like nation, and they don’t like race. They don’t like thinking about them, don’t like talking about them, don’t like dealing with them, don’t like acknowledging them.
No one votes to preserve what he can’t see or doesn’t like.
The Jews know women are like this, of course, and that’s why they’ve gone to such lengths to recruit Euro women to the side of methodical Jewish-led nation-murder. Women are excellent allies in that cause, as for one thing they can’t see that they’re helping to murder anything: they can’t see race or nation, so can’t see the victims.
Posted by SelousScout on July 14, 2008, 09:30 PM | #
I agree with Diamed, the talking is getting tiresome. I’ve been an active WNist for almost 15 years and I’ve watched as things have deteriorated. However, I have noticed an increasing number of whites speaking out. I receive favourable comments when I wear my WN shirts to the gym or to the beach. I believe there is a market for WN organisation(s) to allow racially-conscious whites to meet, network, exchange ideas, and to become active politically. I can’t believe no one has established such an organisation.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 14, 2008, 10:02 PM | #
“I believe there is a market for WN organisation(s) to allow racially-conscious whites to meet, network, exchange ideas, and to become active politically. I can’t believe no one has established such an organisation.” (—Selous)
You’re talking about meetings in person of course, otherwise every blog qualifies as a “meeting/networking/learning/discussing/idea-testing-and-developing” place.
Don’t some of the blogs on our side hold in-person get-togethers from time to time? Seems to me I’ve seen announcements to that effect, no?
Incidentally, one major French-language blog, Fdesouche.com (a blog very much on our side — they’d be somewhere about half-way between us and, say, BrusselsJournal.com), just held a big bash in Paris for its bloggers, regular readership, and commentariat, and reported afterward it was a huge success.
There are also the “implicitly white” organizations and group activities such as steam locomotive clubs, Civil War and Revolutionary War re-enactment clubs, Nascar auto races, and lots of others, where white and almost exclusively white people congregate. The folk there aren’t WN necessarily but at least you’ll be with your own species: almost everyone there will be Euro. On this, see these two comments by GT:
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/life_in_the_kwa/#c59790
http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/life_in_the_kwa/#c59793
The second comment linked reads,
The activities and organizations in my previous post are “Implicitly White,” some more so than others. Implicitly White behavior is a positive means of achieving exclusionary results in private organizations benefiting from 501c tax status. Non-Europids generally leave. That doesn’t mean you are free to run your mouth, however. Europid members are at various stages of racial consciousness. It is good to have a confident, but low-profile approach.
By the way, this just springs to mind: I haven’t checked, but if there’s no “implicitly white” entry at Wikipedia, maybe someone on our side ought to submit one.
Posted by EC on July 14, 2008, 11:28 PM | #
Earlier you were discussing the most effective means of reaching the people who need to be educated in order to bring about a correction in the current trend toward growing dilution of the caucasian race, which is fueled by propaganda through social engineering, by means of media and “anti-racist” laws.
From my point of view, you already have a very good site. I’m sure you want to maintain credibility, but posting a shocking image or headline now and then in order to “wake people up” to the reality our race is currently facing needn’t jeopardise that.
What brought me here a while back, was an image I happened to run across of a severely beaten and bloodied Swedish teenage girl who had been savagely gang-raped by a group of Muslim refugees. Until I read the story linked to that photo, I had no idea of the ongoing epidemic due to that government’s silence on the issue.
The internet is a vast place, and when like-minded sites link together as they have here, it becomes a simple thing to find the answers to all our questions. The natural progression then becomes, as stated earlier, to share the information with people we come in contact with on an everyday basis.
It’s amazing how long it can take to break down the illogic of this self-annihilating point of view: to reverse the effects of a lifetime of brainwashing. In the end, patience and persistence coupled with our naturally imbued intellect are all that are required, if applied in great enough numbers, that is.
Posted by 2R on July 15, 2008, 02:49 AM | #
”What if, let’s say, word got out among whites, and spread nationwide by word-of-mouth, that Michael Eisner’s Jewish-oriented Disney Company” (Fred Scrooby)
I was watching the Disney channel last night and watched a show called “Dave the Barbarian.” Dave is white, along with his sisters and father but for some reason, his mother is black? I’m not joking, the more I watched the more disturbing it got. It was supposed to take place in Middle Ages Europe but had a multicultural cast of charters including mixed race couples. The main “God” type person on the show was an Arab and this “God’s” name was something like “The Evolution Master.” It was an obvious attempt to introduce evolution to Children, and a way of pushing an Arab “God” all at the same time. This isn’t to say I don’t believe in Evolution, but it was so obvious what they’re trying to do.
Anyway, I agree with your boycott idea all the way. This is how we’ll reverse the race replacement process. Boycotts, sit-ins, all peaceful stuff. We must fight it this way because its exactly the opposite of what they portray us as. They won’t know how to handle it. Anyone who talks about “the day of the rope” must be considered either an informant or too stupid to be any help.
Of course, many have pointed out that an ideology must be developed, and this is true. But what I can’t figure out, is who this ideology is meant for? Are we writing for the masses? Or are we writing this for the us? What can we compare this ideology to? The Communist manifesto? The Bible? The Federalist papers?
Even more simple: How do we define an ideology? Are we telling the masses why they should put race before all? Or, are we assuming that they’re beyond that stage and are now guiding them to the next step?
Does economics factor in? Or do economics not matter? Are we suggesting the micro-community approach?
At some point I suggest we have a conversation that just addresses these very elementary questions. If this conversation has been had, can someone please give me a link to it?
Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 15, 2008, 03:36 AM | #
An absolutely astonishing exchange has taken place between GW and the author of the Zinnlandia piece at BrusselsJournal.com: GW’s comment and Zinnlandia author’s reply.
That exchange between those two is momentous.
I got home from the office very late tonight, and began a light supper while sitting at the computer catching up on things, when I read this pair of comments and my jaw dropped and my eyes bugged out.
I set my dinner plate aside, pasted the two comments onto a page for typing, and started to tap out my view of their significance, when I remembered I could not continue because I have to finish a bundle of paperwork I brought home from the office, and it’s nearly 11:30.
I would strongly recommend any further commentary on this from our guys take place here, not over there. The Zinnlandia guy has gone as far as he can in sticking his neck out with that unbelievably brave reply he gave GW. That thing was astounding enough: he absolutely cannot go further than that and no one here should expect him to. He took a giant step there, one which was breathtaking.
No one here should go over there at this point and put him in any awkward positions by forcing him to address certain topics in greater detail. I would leave it alone over there for now, and keep further discussion of the matter over here at MajorityRights for the moment.
Posted by 2R on July 15, 2008, 06:01 AM | #
I don’t read BJ, but it appears to be a European version of Chronicles? People more concerned about the Ten Commandments hanging on the wall at school, than the pack of non-whites hanging out on the wall at school? They even have a resident anti-anti-Semite, who will fall deep into a petulant frenzy if someone speaks bad of “The Jewish People?” Is it actually out of Europe?
Guessedworker’s comment was right on, but knowing that BJ is hostile to those who “name the Jew” wouldn’t it have been a better idea not to say “name the JEW?” You could have said something about the “Jewish Question” or something a little less abrasive, but actually using the term “name the Jew” might not be a good tactic?
The author of the essay seems like he has his sense about him? And as Fred Scrooby pointed out, he’s gone far enough on that site as it is. What I wonder however is, how necessary is it for us to “name the Jew.”
I prefer to call it “the forces of race-replacement.” GW was right in pointing out that being an “anti-Semite” is like, the worst thing anyone can be, so why fall pray to this? Most people don’t even realize that Jews aren’t “White like them,” so why make it more confusing for the sleepy Whites? In time, after they start to understand racialism, they’ll realize and understand the whole Jewish thing. Many people I know understand Jewish treachery, while at the same time, not approving of non-white immigration. But if I were to out of nowhere “name the Jew,” they would think I was a “Nazi conspiracy theory guy.” I know this from experience. They just don’t equate Jew=mass non-white immigration??
The other side of this, is maybe we shouldn’t beat around the bush? Maybe we need to “NAME THE JEW” and not let up?
So I guess my question is:
Why is the strategy of “naming the Jew” preferable to calling it “the forces of race-replacement” or “Cultural Marxism” or “Marxist-Liberalism?”
Posted by EC on July 15, 2008, 08:13 AM | #
Fred Scrooby said, “the Jews at every level they influence, be it academia, the communications media, the world of politics, private organisations and the big foundations, book publishing, entertainment, and so on, hype those who deny race, are anti-racist, or are pro-race-replacement”.
Is that what is behind the miscegenation? A tiny group of people that has the power to convince so many to deny their own heritage, culture and even race?! I realize that there are some sub-agendas going on here, but shouldn’t saving the race take precedence? This is of greatest concern.
Correct me if I am wrong, but there are some basic differences in the consequences of white women vs. white men having children with other races: (Hint, worry about the women).
1. A white woman is limited in the number of children she can bear. Having even one of her offspring with a non-white will forever change that child’s genetics for the worse, in terms of dominant features (for all you other races who are so quick to take offense). This is all the more so for Nordic women who typically have only one child, perhaps two, in her lifetime.
2. A man, on the other hand, has virtually unlimited amounts of genes to spread around, if he were so inclined (not that his morals would necessarily allow it). To take this thought one step further, just for the sake of argument, any offspring as a result of his union with a non-white would be an improvement in ways that I do not need to specify here. Would it be going too far to say that, while the woman would be harming the child in example 1, the man would be improving the fate of the child(ren) in example 2, in other words, helping make the world a little better one child at a time? This, of course, is strictly hypothetical since we need our white men taking care of their white families.
We know that the reverse is true for white women who have children with non-whites. The unnecessary risks and problems they create for their children are numerous: Ranging from health issues; mental and emotional challenges; social acceptance and finally the loss of such a primal connection as not looking anything like their white parent (the recessive genes often not showing themselves except in rare instances here and there down the line).
Shall we discuss the unpleasant aspect of dead-beat or run-away fathers. Who are they? Statistics show that the greatest numbers are comprised of blacks, hispanics, and other non-white races.
There is something special about seeing one’s physical features passed along to the next generation. It helps create bonding between the parent and child. When that is lacking, sad to say, the child’s future can be adversely affected. It sounds cold, even narcissistic to say it, but human nature being what it is, why risk your and your childs happiness on a propaganda-based fad?
A quick anecdote: I was walking in a local park last summer and saw a homely chinese woman pushing a baby-stroller with two homely, chinese-looking children in it. In other words, they looked exactly like her, but with slight improvements in their features. Along came the father (presumably the husband of the homely chinese woman) and joined them. He was white and (shock!) quite handsome. We couldn’t fathom what on earth he was thinking with this match. This city is loaded with good looking, eligible white women to start a family with. Why her? She certainly did not make up for her looks with a nice personality because we observed how she was not at all friendly towards him. Had he had some bad relationships, and thus opted for a catalog bride? We’ll never know, but this, however, is certain: Those children will never look like him. Period. Can he say that he will never once wonder what it could have been like, or that he will never have secret regrets at this completely unnecessary outcome?
As regrettable as his case may be, the truth is that this man can go on to have more children if he so chooses. A white woman in the reverse situation does not have that option. She is limited and thus more vulnerable. In conclusion, if it is true that if there is an agenda for mixing races (and I believe there is), it makes sense that women would be the primary target. Their wombs are in short supply and necessary for the task at hand. The women in Nordic countries are currently being bombarded with blatant propaganda to be color-blind and not to be “racist” in choosing a mate. Then they disparage white men and even go so far as to publish articles in their media suggesting that it’s a bad thing to continue giving birth to white men--the cause of all the world’s ills.
Find a way to protect the women and the job of saving the race is half done.
Posted by EC on July 15, 2008, 08:28 AM | #
Here’s a tip for those of you who may not be familiar with which number one topic would draw women in to this site. Beauty. They need to see what is really going on--before they have kids.
Speaking of...check this one out 
: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Thebes/8250/AngelicBeaut.html
Posted by Bill on July 15, 2008, 11:00 AM | #
Knife-crime and our civilisation.
To those who may not know, there is a crisis debate taking place in Britain today among the hand wringing classes, concerning the lifestyle choice of youth and knife stabbings, of which there is an endemic among black youths. Last weekend, over 20 youths were stabbed in our cities, mostly in London.
The government, media and chattering classes are in apoplexy as to what is the cause and how to respond to the problem, suffice to say, they all have this huge loony liberal disconnect when addressing black crime - or have they?
Something seismic has happened in the media (read BBC) since last weekend, there has been what I can only describe as a mega falling of scale from the BBC’s eyes. Interview after interview, discussion after discussion, set studio piece after set studio piece have had one mind boggling theme - a preponderance of black faces - youfs, social workers, outreach types, mostly black! What is going on here?
Has the scale really fallen? Have the tectonic plates split asunder? Are the dots being connected? I don’t know, I really don’t, this is new territory we’re in - watch this space.
Which all of the above leads me to a slight change of tack here, the question of how do we waken the great number of our sleeping allies and companions in the wider world, as to the peril they are in? This, is without doubt, the most perplexing question of our time, and will go down as such in history for all time.
The reasons are varied and many, which are too big a task for me here, but I want to concentrate on one aspect and that is peak Oil and Global Warming. For those who PO an GW is an establishment scam, please bear with me, for if you read on – you will hopefully see it doesn’t really matter whether PO and GW are a scam or not, let me enlarge.
For years now, PO and latterly GW, have been the preserve of a select bunch of scientists, ecofreaks, experts and assorted anoraks. Specialist minority sites that have been warning of dire things to come, Kunstler for example and The Oil Drum and others have quietly, unemotionally, (Kunstler unemotional? hmmm) and relentlessly have pegged away at their message. Day after day, week after week, month after month for years, with little success other than to their little band of faithful disciples.
But what do we find today? In governments worldwide, in the media worldwide, in the pubs, clubs, at work, the topics of PO and GW are right up there with who will be voted off Big Brother this week, PO and GW have gone mainstream. Why is this?
Reality is why this is, real events in real time have forced awareness on the general public, dramatic increases in foodstuffs, inflation has taken off, fuel prices are through the roof, reality has kicked in with a vengeance, Kevin and Sally have been poked in the eye with a pointed stick – and it hurts. Golly gosh, it’s not exactly rocket science is it?
It will be the same with racial awareness and perceive threat. As people feel the noose tightening (more quickly in Britain than anywhere - because of size) then they, Kev and Sal will join the dots in double quick time. (and how far behind will the media be?)
How long will it take? Quicker than we think I suspect, because events are moving at breakneck speed, just look how far things have come in the last two years, for those who can see, our civilisation is crumbling before our eyes, America is imploding, Russia, India, China have taken over the reins, conventional Western politics are under threat, capitalism is teetering, fuel, energy, Iran, immigration, burgeoning population, climate change, and civilisational malaise are the heady ingredients for this apoplectic pie – or is it one gigantic conspiracy to kick start some other venture – like NWO.
Things are coming rapidly to a head, and it is in sites such as this, that it is all being recorded - for the historians of the future.
Posted by Rusty Mason on July 15, 2008, 01:35 PM | #
All our existing institutions have been corrupted by the multicult, we must start anew. We cannot change the whole world at once, but we can help and influence those around us. We are supremely disorganized, completely atomized into little more than individual consumer units.
What to do? There is a group called the Vinlanders (http://www.vinlanders.com), which I think is a good model for how to organize. Their project is simplicity itself: form a social club of like-minded men (or men and women), and help each other out. That’s it. That’s the big idea many are looking for.
Each group can decide how it wants to operate, what rules to follow, and what projects to work on. Each group will take on the characteristics of its membership and could network with other groups. You don’t need formal dues, no lists, no complicated real estate deals or scary-sounding “compounds,” nor do you need to do anything complicated if you don’t want to. Just work together to help one another, both in your own group, and in other groups. No one is stopping anyone from doing this, it’s perfectly legal and socially and morally acceptable.
Picture this: Group A’s membership happens to have a lot of pointy-heads (like us), and their project(s) might be homeschooling support for those parents who are raising white-collar working types (lawyers, doctors, engineers, etc.), ACT or SAT test prep, or helping parents find college grant money. Group B is similar, containing more artsy-fartsy types, and their project(s) include historical revisionism, homeschooling support for the liberal arts (history, foreign languages, music, etc.). Group C, being more practical, works to provide vocational education training, hunting and fishing and camping knowledge, and agricultural and mechanical know-how. Group V can concentrate on keeping its members employed and out of jail and off drugs, and so on. Any group could have as many or few (or none) projects of any kind they wish. It’s unlimited, really. The important thing is just to form the group, for comradery and moral support, if nothing else.
Once formed, they could blog and let others see how they do it, how to avoid problems, how to keep out the riff-raff, etc. They could provide encouragement and offer instruction by their example, or through a short start-up manual. Imagine, in a few years, other Europeans imitating your org because they see such strong, confident, and successful men and women emerging from it.
I’ve mentioned this idea to people before, but receive only blank stares. Why no one is interested, I can only guess. It’s a social, intellectual, and hopeless desert out there and our children are going to suffer greatly if nothing changes soon. Yet few will lift a finger. Perhaps the couch is just too comfortable just now. Perhaps the pain has not been localized enough yet.
Posted by Rusty Mason on July 15, 2008, 01:44 PM | #
Their project is simplicity itself:
There method is ...
Posted by Rusty Mason on July 15, 2008, 01:55 PM | #
Michael Savage joke the other day, Put 2 Jews in a room for two hours and they’ll come out with five new organizations. (Or something similar). MacDonald talks about how strong Jews are because they organize and network so feverishly.
Posted by GT on July 15, 2008, 05:02 PM | #
Picture this: Group A’s membership happens to have a lot of pointy-heads (like us), and their project(s) might be homeschooling support for those parents who are raising white-collar working types (lawyers, doctors, engineers, etc.), ACT or SAT test prep, or helping parents find college grant money. Group B is similar, containing more artsy-fartsy types, and their project(s) include historical revisionism, homeschooling support for the liberal arts (history, foreign languages, music, etc.). Group C, being more practical, works to provide vocational education training, hunting and fishing and camping knowledge, and agricultural and mechanical know-how. Group V can concentrate on keeping its members employed and out of jail and off drugs, and so on. Any group could have as many or few (or none) projects of any kind they wish. It’s unlimited, really. The important thing is just to form the group, for comradery and moral support, if nothing else.
This is an extremely positive and productive idea. Provisos:
1. Keep the groups local.
2. Encourage projects.
3. Represent yourselves as a collection of family and friends.
4. Eschew Reich images, icons, symbols; keep it “American.”
Once formed, they could blog and let others see how they do it, how to avoid problems, how to keep out the riff-raff, etc. They could provide encouragement and offer instruction by their example, or through a short start-up manual. Imagine, in a few years, other Europeans imitating your org because they see such strong, confident, and successful men and women emerging from it.
My sons and their friends refer to themselves as the “Iron Legion.” That idea originated with Rienzi’s “Legion Europa” and the defunct European-American Student Union some years ago. They haven’t a web presence. If they did, they would use another name.
Field manual and handbooks – not CDs – are very important. One could use the organization of Army/Marine Corps manuals as a kind of loose, general guideline. I would. One field manual might address start ups. Another might address courtesies and parliamentary procedure. Another might define “white” and what it means to be “white.” Another might address educational/technical resources and databases. Others might address strategies for local economic groups, alternate production, and non-MSM political marketing. And so forth and so on. Essentials from each manual could be distilled and placed in a handbook.
Employment and marital histories are an important means of excluding riff-raff.
Posted by Rusty Mason on July 15, 2008, 07:12 PM | #
GT,
Organizing as a homeschooling group is a wonderful way to keep it American, family-friendly, and productive for the long-term. What real American could object to it? It’s not a cover for something else, it’s a real American way to live, being pioneers and taking full responsibility for yourself and your family. You will be an important part of a collection of family and friends, and will be making a huge difference in the lives of everyone associated with it.
Riff-raff are easy to spot in such a group; education is very personal and others can feel when something is not right with other members. The serious troublemakers would not normally hang around long, anyway, if they ever did join in the first place. Most men these days find anything related to education boring, and this is especially true for the lazy ne’r-do-wells. The few feminazis that wander ouside the State system are effectively neutered by your group’s male leadership.
Another might define “white.”
This is not really necessary, although you could if you wanted to. Any org suitably named and with a curriculum that is clearly biased toward Europeans would convey the message adequately and comfortably. Any group name should convey seriousness and taste in addition to a Eurocentric sensibility.
BTW, thank you again for the many links to free military manuals and education textbooks (click the Homeschooling link on this site, upper left). I’ve started an outline of a classical curriculum here:
http://www.rustymason.com/edu/curriculum.html Hopefully, I can get time and motivation to provide a decent description of it for inclusion on this site. I have also made a few pages about some alternative schooling styles:
http://www.rustymason.com/edu/alted.html
Classical is my favorite, but I’ve tried to be fair to the other types, even the lefty ones.
Also, being involved in a such a group does not mean that one is cut off from other organizational activitities, far from it. As a leader in a group that produces quality results, you will have a little more clout to other organizations related to WN and such.
Check out my curriculum and schooling types and let me know what you think. Then toss out a few possible names for yourhomeschooling group.
Posted by GT on July 15, 2008, 09:49 PM | #
Maguire sends the following:
In starting PLE University (Pioneer Little Europe) from the ground up I think vBulletin can do all that’s needed. The CNC-Zone is a good example of how far vBulletin Board can be extended, specialized and grown.
Subjects & Accreditation.
PLE University should initially be founded as a prep school for:
General Education Core CLEP tests.
$70 per test. Some tests like Chemistry cover two semesters of coursework, which is 7 credits at *****. I’d initially aim PLE University at preparing students to pass these CLEP tests, which fully cover “General Education” and the average 30 credits for Gen Ed requirements. It’s precisely these subjects that contain the most toxic anti-white racial hate material, professors, and activism.
Pricing. We know CLEP will take their $70 exam fee. If PLE U charges another $70 - $100 per prep course this yields $170 total cost per course CLEPed. Deduct the higher tuition, fees, fuel, time, annoyance, danger and the dysfunctional classroom environments and the price is very competitive with local community colleges, not to mention state universities.
PLE University Press
We should not neglect the opportunity to begin breaking the Judeo textbook monopolies. Print On Demand is ready when we are.
Google Books & USG materials provide a broad starting point. The instructor or author formats and supplements the material to a CLEP prep orientation, includes additional learning materials as desirable, and edits undesirable and unessential anti-white agit-prop.
I think the above is the kind of foundation we have to look towards laying.
-----
GT again: Rusty, I’ll look over your material later tonight.
Posted by Guessedworker on July 15, 2008, 10:57 PM | #
Rusty,
The following long article by Welf Herfurth, cross-posted from his blog, meshes with your thoughts on forming social groups. You