Microcommunity:  A Definition

Posted by onlooker on April 10, 2008, 05:12 PM | #

GT,

I guess I already belong to a micocommunity via the golf leagues and sports teams I participate in (and the local watering holes!). We employ each other. We do bussiness with each other through barter, or actual money exchange. We participate in family get togethers such as picnics, parties, weddings, funerals, etc. Heck, that’s not a new concept, it’s everyday normal life in America.  Does that qualify as a microcommunity? If it doesn’t, what’s different about a microcommunity than what I’ve described?

Posted by GT on April 10, 2008, 06:45 PM | #

I guess I already belong to a micocommunity via the golf leagues and sports teams I participate in (and the local watering holes!). We employ each other. We do bussiness with each other through barter, or actual money exchange. We participate in family get togethers such as picnics, parties, weddings, funerals, etc. Heck, that’s not a new concept, it’s everyday normal life in America.  Does that qualify as a microcommunity? If it doesn’t, what’s different about a microcommunity than what I’ve described?

There is quite a bit of difference, actually.

This thing is not difficult, Onlooker, unless one has been brainwashed by Ms. Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand) and her acolytes or raised in a monetarist family.  The microcommunity you describe is business-centered, not socially-centered.  Its social activities are peripheral to business concerns, not family and friendship. That’s a huge difference to non-socially atomized people like myself.  Socially-centered microcommunities don’t fall apart with a downturn in business fortunes.  Yours will.

How do I know your microcommunity is business-centered?  One indication was readily obvious in your description which prioritized golf leagues, sport teams, local watering holes, mutual employment, and joint business ventures with “friends.” Playtime and business was emphasized.  Family came in dead last.  It should have been first.  Your description failed to incorporate non-monetarist methods of insuring your family’s welfare.  Either you forgot to do so or it is not a concern.  These are only two reasons why it is safe to say that your microcommunity’s primary interests are monetarist – tied to minimizing personal labor by leveraging other people’s money, perpetuating easy credit, artificially inflating the value of equities, and maximizing dollar quantity. There are more reasons.  If the easy dollar falls, then your microcommunity’s social relationships will fall apart.  I hope your family doesn’t.

Posted by onlooker on April 10, 2008, 07:41 PM | #

>>“This thing is not difficult, Onlooker, unless one has been brainwashed by Ms. Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand) and her acolytes or raised in a monetarist family.”

GT,

With all due respect, you presuppose my social class; I’m in the middle class. I was raised in a lower middle class neighborhood. A very very lower middle-class neighborhood.

What you call a “microcommunity,” I refer to as a ‘social circle.’ Mine is a combination of new friends to lifelong friends, family, extended family, bussiness acquaintances, etc. We all participate with each other in social events, sporting activities, family get togethers, and bussiness arrangements.

>>“Family came in dead last.  It should have been first.”

If the whole social and economic structure collapse in the USA, my family and I will seek refuge in Galt’s Gulch. LOL

Posted by GT on April 10, 2008, 07:48 PM | #

Onlooker,

Many former Republicans call themselves “white nationalist” simply because they do not like multiracialism.  That’s not good enough.  Throughout the Eurosphere monetarism has always tolerated or encouraged multiracialism.  It is safe to say that it always will.  There is no rational reason to believe otherwise.  Genuine white nationalism cannot be an extension of monetarist economics because monetarism always relegates racialism to a “peculiarity” in the long run.  For white nationalism to be the antidote to monetarist excess it must tie local economic self-sufficiency, as well as social and political empowerment, to decentralized currencies and barter.  As long as members of the Europid upperclass oppose this option they can never be white nationalist other than in name and as part of a risk-free, minimal investment pose.

Posted by GT on April 10, 2008, 08:13 PM | #

Onlooker,

I recognized your origins long ago.  Traces are evident in your writing.  Traces are probably evident in your speech and mannerisms, as well.  Your origins approximate my own, except mine are primarily rural.  I’ve always known you were middle-class, as I am.

As to the rest, the American middle-class has always imitated the wealthy and the wealthy have always imitated the British nobility.  I’m not sure the British nobility are very wealthy any more.  Nevertheless, this is what I call “me-tooism.”

Your microcommunity is business-centered and monetarist.  Understand you’re being educated, not blamed for this.  You could not have known.  American Europids have been socially atomized.  It’s a constant effort to change.  Now that you understand what I mean, all you need do now is carefully consider how best to change the group’s orientation - assuming it can be done, of course, without destroying the relationships.

Posted by onlooker on April 10, 2008, 08:39 PM | #

“Throughout the Eurosphere monetarism has always tolerated or encouraged multiracialism.”

They do so because it fits their economic model. What better way is there to grow the economy them import a bunch of muds? This sets in motion a strong chain reaction. First the muds displace the working-class whites in their old neighborhoods, i.e. causing “white flight.’ The whites must relocate into the suburbs causing a boom in housing construction. The urban sprawl just cascades from there. Who benefits? E.g., the wealthy land developers and all those who supply them ... the list of those who benefit goes on and on. The monetarists’ theory is: In order to grow the economy, a growing population through immigration is essential. This model works but it’s contingent upon the availability of money flowing from the central banks and government. What does the national debt stand at now, 10 Trillion? What about private debt? The dollar is collapsing in value against foreign currencies. How long will it be before cheap Chinese imports aren’t cheap anymore? The era of easy money and false prosperity is coming to an end. GT, I really don’t think we have much to disagree about? But then again, who amongst us has the ability to predict the future with accuracy?

Posted by GT on April 10, 2008, 09:01 PM | #

Onlooker,

GT, I really don’t think we have much to disagree about?

No, we don’t.  You’re where I was a few years ago while trying to figure out what the hell was wrong with white nationalism, that’s all.  Continue to think carefully about it, place it in a logical order and you’ll be okay. 

My issue is with easy online racialism’ poseurs and status quo:  pseudo-elitist bookclubbers on one hand, failed felons and game geeks elevated to hero status on the other.  The timeless “collapse or revolution” approach ain’t cutting it.

Easy online racialism is about information.  Nothing else.  All here are infobabes, including myself.  Leadership is where boots on the ground lead to socioeconomic breakout, an increase in numbers, and local political legitimacy.

Posted by 2R on April 10, 2008, 10:34 PM | #

If you guys are interested in the subject of micro-communities then I suggest the book “Brave New War” by John Robb.  I’m including a link to his blog.  Check out his blog and follow the link to his book on Amazon.  Read the reviews of his book, as this will give you a good idea of what he’s all about.  He writes some interesting stuff and considers the creation of micro-communities to be essential.  He see the current trend of building one giant network for the world as very dangerous, as disrupting these networks will become increasingly easier for so called “super empowered individuals” to do.  I think the readers at this site will appreciate his work.  His book discusses everything from community security to energy.  He’s a computer programmer and uses a lot of computer metaphors such as the term “resilient communities” when discussing his vision for micro-communities. 

http://globalguerrillas.typepad.com/globalguerrillas/

Posted by jgjifh on April 11, 2008, 12:32 AM | #

GT—are there any extant “microcommunities” fitting your definition?

The Amish, and their self-reliance, and rejection of govt approaches re. welfare, military service etc. have always seemed admirable to me. Are they one such microcommunity?

Posted by GT on April 11, 2008, 01:00 AM | #

Thanks for the link, 2R.  There is lots of good information there.  Here’s an excerpt from an editorial review of Robb’s book:

This evolutionary leap in the methods of warfare makes it possible for extremely small nonstate groups to fight states and possibly win on a regular basis. The use of systems disruption as a method of strategic warfare gives rise to a nightmare scenario in which any nation—including the United States—can be driven to bankruptcy by an enemy it can’t compete with economically. We are staring at a future where defeat isn’t experienced all at once but as an inevitable withering away of military, economic, and political power through wasting conflicts with minor foes.

“How can we defend ourselves against this pernicious new menace? Brave New War presents a debate-changing argument that no one who cares about national security can afford to ignore: it is time, says Robb, to decentralize all of our systems, from energy and communications to security and markets. It is time for every citizen to take personal responsibility for some aspect of state security. It is time to make our systems, and ourselves, as flexible, adaptable, and resilient as the forces that are arrayed against us.

Now I understand why Robb’s “controversial” in the counter-terrorism field.  He advocates decentralization to preserve the urban services propping the State.  The problem is decentralization works in our favor in areas dominated by the Europid underclasses.  Unlike Iraqis, we could turn on the State like a rattlesnake.  From the State’s perspective – and by State I’m referring to the jew and his most powerful ally and protector, the Europid traitor h. Monetarus – it’s better to “harden” services, increase surveillance, manage response from a remote location, and lessen the ability of small groups to act independently by minimizing and controlling essential needs.

I love his thinking.  I will buy his book:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471780790/ref=nosim/globalguerril-20

Posted by GT on April 11, 2008, 01:31 AM | #

jgjifh,

GT—are there any extant “microcommunities” fitting your definition?

To my knowledge there are no exact matches, due to our racial exclusivity.  The problem is not insurmountable, however.  That is why I emphasize family and friend -centeredness, so that the community is legally structured as a heterogeneous array of natural persons.  Now my legal knowledge is limited to that of a small businessman, so it’s possible I’m using the wrong terminology in trying to describe the concept.  Nevertheless, I do not think “they” - meaning the enemy - can outlaw our microcommunities without outlawing families and friendships.  I also think that family and friends can buy homes and/or property adjacent or near one another.  Geographical proximity is important.  I see no reason why 3-5 households or properties can’t be contiguous or located within short distances from each other.  The microcommunity’s physical arrangement would likely depend on its member’s needs, goals, etc.

At the onset of seeding a rural county - like Oregon County, Missouri, for example - there should be space between the microcommunities.  Not a great amount of space, but enough to avoid a physically homogenous disposition in how the communities are arrayed.  I prefer to use the county’s population and the population of its communities (incorporated and unincorporated) as a general guide to the number and location of our microcommunities.  County per capita and household income will have an effect on number and location as well, to my thinking.

Back to your question before I side-tracked myself:

The Amish are one example, but with 19th century technological disadvantages.  The Swiss Confederation is another style much more to my liking.  There are also race-mixing, leftist “intentional communities” on the Internet you can Google to glean additional information.  Keep in mind that ICs can do certain things that we can’t.

Posted by jgjifh on April 11, 2008, 02:14 AM | #

It seems like you’re intent on playing by the rules of those who would constantly re-write the rules and spoil your plans. To what end are you playing “go-along” for the while - where do you want to be and to do what? Or are autonomous communities of isolated extended families your ultimate goal?

Posted by onlooker on April 11, 2008, 02:49 AM | #

“You’re where I was a few years ago while trying to figure out what the hell was wrong with white nationalism, that’s all.  Continue to think carefully about it, place it in a logical order and you’ll be okay.”

No, GT. I know exactly what went wrong with WN. It was proceeding quite well. Militias were forming. Congress was leaning towards anti affirmative action legislation (remember the Republican Revolution or Revolution of ‘94 ?)… But when Tim McVeigh decided to bomb the Mural Federal Building, WN came to a complete halt. Think back, GT. You should agree I’m right. The Clinton Administration et al, proclaimed the incident all revolved around militias, WN oriented shortwave radio programs, and the devotes of the Turner Diaries. After that, everyone who was someone, distanced themselves from the WN movement.

That incident served the ZOG many opportunities to advance their pro Zionist agendas. They even included it as a pretext to continue their inexplicable/unjustifiable military aggression on Iraq.

Posted by jgjifh on April 11, 2008, 03:38 AM | #

GT, for the record: I don’t want you to get the wrong idea, having this mini-interrogation come your way, I, for one, am wholly on your side and get much benefit from your posts.

Posted by 2R on April 11, 2008, 04:47 AM | #

GT,

I read his book and found his ideas refreshing.  Your analysis on why the elites consider him to be “controversial” is spot on too.  He also thinks that turning the 3rd world into a Jeffersonian Democracy is impossible.  Imagine that? 

Another question we need to ask is how to keep our communities majority white?  IOW, what locational characteristics attract non-whites.  Obviously we don’t want to create our communities near any large agro-businesses.  Urban areas are out too.  We need to figure out what types of geographies attract non-whites and avoid them.

Most people, when thinking about this, picture some rural area.  I always thought about occupying a small rotted out industrial town.  Maybe 1000 or so white families moving in and figuring it all out.  We could create a town enterprise that we use to export something.  Of course, this would be after we developed a self sustaining community.  The town enterprise would be to better our situation but not necessarily for survival.  Then a 1000 more white families occupy the next town over and do the same.  Eventually we’d have a network of little towns and peripheries. 

Of course, like others have pointed out, how long would it take before the housing projects came in or before a cache of RPGs, Hitler books, and typed out plans to take over the world were mysteriously found on someones property by the feds?

Posted by GT on April 11, 2008, 03:28 PM | #

Are autonomous communities of isolated extended families your ultimate goal?

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/8647/goalsrq8.jpg

Where do you want to be and to do what?

Timeline (for above):  No specifics online.  In general, we set the schedule.  The enemy does not.

However, in regards to white nationalism, I expect to see: a) a groundswell of support and positive contributions by summer’s end and b) the first microcommunities on the ground and led by iron men of above average intelligence by this time, two years from now.

Posted by onlooker on April 11, 2008, 04:45 PM | #

“However, in regards to white nationalism, I expect to see: a) a groundswell of support and positive contributions by summer’s end”

That sounds great, GT! Can you elaborate on it? What do you see that causes you to expect a “groundswell” of support for white nationalism by summers end?

Posted by GT on April 11, 2008, 07:49 PM | #

2R,

Of course, like others have pointed out, how long would it take before the housing projects came in …?

This objection is straw-grasping by conservative monetarists whose “racialism” is subordinate to preserving an urban lifestyle greased by easy money. If the monetarist is upperclass, then his “racialism” is limited to a dislike of seeing Sub-Saharan Africans and/or Mexicans in non-servile roles.  If the monetarist is an underclass pretender to the upperclass, then his “racialism” is limited to a dislike of having Sub-Saharan Africans and/or Mexicans elevated above him.  Neither individual is willing to effect racial separation if rural relocation or economic autonomy for Europids is required and monetarism rejected. They are not true racialists.  Needless to say, they don’t like being categorized this way.  The truth hurts.

The straw-grasping is intended to perpetuate and justify the “racialist” status quo, which has been perfectly happy to sell the failed, paleoconservative “collapse or revolution” scenario for the past 50 years. The enemy, too, is interested in perpetuating this failure.  Carefully note how he never criticizes it.  Note, too, how he perpetuates the myth that our failed approach is effective, or could be effective if we are not “carefully watched.” Finally, easy online racialism is the perfect avenue for all of this due to its potential reach and carrying capacity, the anonymity that it offers, and our insistence on using enemy memes as part of our self-description. 

Why is it straw-grasping?

It is straw-grasping because the legal structure for a microcommunity is heterogeneously arrayed.  This means the community is comprised of natural persons whose ties are primarily familial and social.  In a legal sense these persons are decentralized.  That is because their primary business is not business. They are not a business entity or an artificial person, although the individuals involved can and should create a separate business entity to engage in beneficial dollar transactions with the greater community.  Beyond that, the natural persons within the microcommunity can use barter, reciprocal gift-giving, issue IOUs, or use some other form of local/electronic currency for transactions among themselves, with select individuals in the greater community, and with other microcommunities.

It is straw-grasping because no microcommunity has the historical basis to qualify as an “unincorporated community.” Neither would its members publicly refer to themselves as a community, town, or village.

It is straw-grasping because the geographical disposition of microcommunities is heterogenous, which means the communities are decentralized and not physically adjoining.

It is straw-grasping because a microcommunity’s composition needn’t be “a bunch of white nationalists” or dumbasses who haven’t the sense to use another name for themselves in public.  Most of my near and extended family and friends, for example, understand what is going on.  They never refer to themselves as “white nationalists.” They refer to themselves as whites, publicly and as Whites or Europids, privately.  The exception to this rule is my online use of the term for communication purposes.  I certainly am not “a bunch of white nationalists.” I am only one.

Most of this straw-grasping is done by individuals with limited strategic thinking ability, who live near or amongst Africans and Mexicans in their urban/suburban wonderlands, and are vainly searching for any reason whatsoever to continue doing what they’re doing – nothing – with minimal risk and discomfort. 

These individuals are in effect saying, “Forget land, water, and food.  You can buy everything you need.  Stay dependent, like us.”

Posted by GT on April 11, 2008, 09:53 PM | #

2R,

How to keep our communities majority all white?

To name a few:

1.  Microcommunities are comprised of family and friends.
2.  Transgressors (a race-mixing child, for example) are excluded.
3.  Employment opportunities are never advertised.
4.  Work, barter and compensation trade, volunteerism.

What locational characteristics attract non-whites?

To name a few:

1.  Balmy weather.
2.  Central air and heating.
3.  Federal Reserve money.
4.  Free stuff.

Posted by Captainchaos on April 11, 2008, 10:55 PM | #

GT,

In the microcommunities we also need a commitment by members to healthy fecundity, emphasis on traditional sex/gender roles such as the “manly virtues” for young men and the femininity for young women, and inculcating a sense of pride in and knowledge of European culture.

In short: “We need to breed like mestizos and live like White men.”

Posted by Captainchaos on April 11, 2008, 11:26 PM | #

Correction: “the femininity” should have read “the femininity un sheet”

Posted by onlooker on April 12, 2008, 12:21 AM | #

“[GT]What do you see that causes you to expect a “groundswell” of support for white nationalism by summers end?” (—from my post above)

Since GT ignored my question, I’ll give you the reason why I think WN will experience a groundswell…

B Hussein Obama will! 

If he’s the presumptive Democrat nominee, he and his supporters will engender a groundswell of WN by summer’s end. The more he talks, the more he reveals his contempt for normal whites.

Posted by torgrim on April 12, 2008, 12:59 AM | #

GT;
“These individuals are in effect saying, “forget land, water, and food. You can buy everything you need. Stay dependent like us.”

An example is the farmer’s strike in Argentina. I have been told that the rural areas are populated by Europoids, and the cities are populated by Meztisos. It seems that Argentina follows other places where the European decended folk created a larger carrying capacity from the land.
As mentioned above, free stuff, central heat and air, Fed Money and balmy weather attracts the same groups in Argentina, Rhodesia, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, etc. I know Milwaukee and Minneapolis are not balmy weather destinations, but with the building technology, one only needs to stay indoors to have the balmy weather.

What makes the story of the farmers strike relevant here is, the rural independence vs city dependency and the possiblities, this story demonstrates.  Also, the farmers may be organized beyond just an economic model and may be very aware of the racial differences?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/world/americas/03argent.html?ref=americas

Posted by Fr. John on April 12, 2008, 01:28 PM | #

OF course, the model of the shtetl, or the ‘ghetto’ of the jews is a model paradigm of this thesis.

Which is why it works.

Like-race individuals, living in proximity to one another, (all within walking distance of the synagogue) and guaranteeing no inroads into a ‘closed’ community, unless they ALL believe it best for the neighborhood, effectively routs the realtor’s selling to the ‘goyim.’

Patronizing the same stores, buying only from ‘in-group’ members, and effectively shunning ‘outsiders’ are age-old strategies.

What of the older “Distributivism” model advocated by Belloc, Chesterton, et al.? Does it have a place in such a vision?
Sounds suspiciously like it, to me…

Posted by GT on April 12, 2008, 03:31 PM | #

Onlooker,

Since GT ignored my question

Not ignored.  Prioritized.

I am not referring to a groundswell of support for white nationalism.  I am referring to a groundswell of support within for the strategy presented above. 

I’ve spent five years in this “market.” If nothing changes by July’s end, I’ll repackage and move on.

Posted by GT on April 12, 2008, 03:54 PM | #

Capnchaos,

...inculcating a sense of pride in and knowledge of European culture.

This is part of the social and educational aspects.  It goes with the territory.

… we also need a commitment by members to healthy fecundity, emphasis on traditional sex/gender roles such as the “manly virtues” for young men and the femininity for young women

Absolutely.  I leave the feminine stuff to females, though.

Almost two decades ago I read something in National Review by the former commander of a military school on the east coast.  He wrote about mandatory essential skills training for young men along with the academics.  As part of that training he wrote that every young man should learn to tear a Volkswagon engine apart and reassemble it.  I agree with this, wholeheartedly. 

Iron men.  Iron legions.  Every man a leader and capable of handling the responsibilities of the man above him.

Posted by GT on April 12, 2008, 04:14 PM | #

Torgrim,

Also, the farmers may be organized beyond just an economic model and may be very aware of the racial differences?

Perhaps, but the NYT will never mention it.

Microcommunities can be organized along any principle - hobbies, business, or family.  Monetarists tend to think of organizing behind a hobby or business pursuit because they are interested in exploiting new markets or are so completely socially-atomized that they can’t conceive of such a thing as social or relationship-centeredness.  I’ll throw yuppie “marriages” in with that group, for I’ve yet to meet a yupcup that weren’t in it for what they could get out of it and damn little else.

Posted by GT on April 12, 2008, 04:35 PM | #

Fr. John,

...buying only from ‘in-group’ members, and effectively shunning ‘outsiders’ are age-old strategies.

Absolutely.  Years ago I had to ask myself why so-called “white nationalists” weren’t discussing, much less building, models advancing that strategy.

Monetaristic, Internet-reinforced social isolation was the answer.

What of the older “Distributivism” model advocated by Belloc, Chesterton, et al.? Does it have a place in such a vision?

My version of distributism is secular, but accomodates others.  I would have no problem engaging in mutually-beneficial social arrangements and economic transactions with the local Christian microcommunity.  The question is, would the local Christian microcommunity be reluctant to engage in the same with me?  Personal experience informs me that they would, for religious reasons, and with little regard as to how well I treated them.  Perhaps the problem is I’ve run into too many Judeo-Christians.  Would Mel Gibson avoid me, I wonder?  I don’t think so.  He seems more “legit” to me.

Posted by Torgrim on April 12, 2008, 04:51 PM | #

GT,

“Almost two decades ago I read something in National Review by the former commander of a military school on the east coast. He wrote about mandatory essential skills training for young men along with academics.”

I would advocate for young men or boys as part of their curriculum, say for three days a school week, part or all of those days, learning as an apprentice with a tradesman. Of course this would be in a micro community founded upon kinship. As I remember from so long ago, that boys become quite bored with the routine of the classroom and even become a problem for the female teachers as they reach those difficult years starting around 12 years old. Nothing would help to create a healthy male, than working with hands and head, under the supervision of trusted elder. Even if it is just clean up and carry, or something more skilled, as the example of tearing down an engine, the point is, boys learn to be men *from* men.

“Perhaps the NYT will never mention it.”
Yes, we will never see the truth of it from that source.

“I’ll throw yuppie marriages in with that group..”
Surely, a business arrangement. Yupcup....ha,ha, I like it!

Posted by onlooker on April 12, 2008, 05:38 PM | #

“I am not referring to a groundswell of support for white nationalism.  I am referring to a groundswell of support within for the strategy presented above.”

Oh, I see.

I thought, perhaps, you were expecting a groundswell of WN due to events like this:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010347.html

Posted by GT on April 12, 2008, 08:14 PM | #

I thought, perhaps, you were expecting a groundswell of WN due to events like this:

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/010347.html

No.  That link is to a jew providing Internet hype for the consumption of gentile monetarists of “racialist” persuasion.  It’s purpose is to make them think that whining about Hillobama and Spike Lee = doing something constructive.  In the end, all Hillobama needs do is threaten them with the loss of their pensions or with imprisonment and they will gulp, sit down, and mumble, “I, I, I didn’t mean ... [evil eye from Hillobama] ...  I mean ... yes sir!”

“Say whut, muhfuckers?”

“Yes Sir.”

“Honky ass muhfuckers, I Can’t Hear You!”

“SIR YES SIR!!”

“That’s what I thought. Honky bitches.”

Posted by onlooker on April 12, 2008, 08:40 PM | #

Ha! I hear ya bro.

But unless B Husein Obama makes a mends with the jews, he’ll certainly be reduced to a job shoveling shit in horse stalls up in Canada ... or worse, much worse. Check this out:

http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/04/12/rev-lees-anti-semitism-a-personal-story/

Posted by onlooker on April 12, 2008, 09:39 PM | #

“WAKE UP WHITE MALES....rescue your women!”

It’s not a matter of “rescuing” those clueless white women who chose to do the wild thing with Black males, it’s a matter of civilizing them.

Posted by onlooker on April 12, 2008, 11:29 PM | #

“onlooker sometimes its those “strict Christian values” that are needed!”

Christian values are needed, Peter, that’s all.

Posted by DavidL on April 12, 2008, 11:50 PM | #

Peter

It’s not your, mine or any other WMs duty to “rescue” white females from their bad decisions.

First time Oooga Booga can’t keep her in diamonds and Mercedes, it’s on to her next victim.

Didn’t Madonna say it best “we are living in a material world and I am a material girl.”

Remember Miss Race Traitor’s face and save your “quill” for a cleaner “inkwell”.

Posted by GT on April 13, 2008, 12:53 AM | #

Yes, Peter, it’s true that most of us in this tiny corner of the “racialist” blight wing are old farts.  Many of us would take advantage of your youth and encourage you to go to emotional pieces the next time you saw a mixed couple and suicide bomb them.  (Strangely enough, so would your racial enemies.  Isn’t that interesting?) Others, on the other hand, would have you stay alive long enough to do something constructive and leave a few children behind in a caring community before dying, and should dying young be in the cards cause a helluva lot more permanent damage to far more worthy targets.  Fundamentally the first group is about self-preservation for them, self-nihilism and suicide for you.  Race survival for them is a pose – a hobby.  The latter group, on the other hand, are all about pulling one’s weight to ensure racial survival, which makes them very unpopular in easy online racialism’s infobabe community.  Educating you is the only reason why the latter group is here at all.  Keep this in mind when reading anything which promotes or bashes the above strategy.

Posted by onlooker on April 13, 2008, 12:59 AM | #

“Isn’t it ironic that if it were the exact opposite situation where it was a white male and me...uhm....it would be so cool ”

Peter,

If you think you’re being smart, witty, or clever, think again. There are “those” out there that read your stupid, irresponsible, comments and use them as justification to physically attack innocent homosexuals.  Just some friendly advice, Peter. Think long and hard about what you say publicly before you say it.

Posted by GT on April 13, 2008, 01:13 AM | #

Peter was a troll and I’ve deleted his comments. 

Thanks, Onlooker.

**Note to “anti-racists,” non-Europids, and homosexuals:  GT’s threads are not free speech zones.

Posted by Fr. John on April 14, 2008, 01:38 PM | #

“Personal experience informs me that they would, for religious reasons, and with little regard as to how well I treated them.  Perhaps the problem is I’ve run into too many Judeo-Christians.  Would Mel Gibson avoid me, I wonder?  I don’t think so.  He seems more “legit” to me.”

GT- ‘The enemy of my enemy has become my friend,’ sort of thing. If you are a cordial, friendly, nice pagan, I’d gladly buy from you. But, you know, we’d still be praying for you, nevertheless!

LOL

P.S. “Judeo-Xtians” are neither. Go look over at http://www.spiritwaterblood.com for serious christians, rather than the ‘race queers’ and ‘sex queers’ in most WCC-infected Churches. Or look at ‘ethnic Orthodoxy’ - but there, they’d want you to become BOTH Christian, AND Greek/Russian!  Oppa!

LOLOL

Posted by onlooker on April 14, 2008, 02:28 PM | #

“P.S. “Judeo-Xtians” are neither. Go look over at http://www.spiritwaterblood.com for serious christians, rather than the ‘race queers’ and ‘sex queers’ in most WCC-infected Churches.” —Fr. John

GT,

Fr. John is right. You should also check out http://kinism.net/ . I think they’d integrate well within a microcommunity, or at least be a compatible ally. Every community needs a moral set of principles and values to be guided by. Kinism could serve to do just that.

Posted by GT on April 14, 2008, 05:46 PM | #

Onlooker,

Fr. John is right. You should also check out http://kinism.net/ . I think they’d integrate well within a microcommunity, or at least be a compatible ally. Every community needs a moral set of principles and values to be guided by. Kinism could serve to do just that.

I’m a member of the Kinist forum, although I’ve only contributed once or twice.  Lady Laurel is my favorite over there due to her vocation and advocacy of homeschooling.  She can’t do it all, however, and probably could use more help from the religiously-inclined.

Contrary to popular belief it’s not true that ‘pagans’ are without morals.  Secular sociobiology leads to conclusions congruent with many Christian principles.  I may address this further in the future.  It’s not a priority at the moment.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 15, 2008, 12:35 PM | #

I agree that Christian Kinism is something to look at seriously for Catholics and members of mainstream Protestant denominations, churches having all embraced the (fill in the blank) ______ insistence that whites are morally obligated to change into Negroes, mestizos, and other non-white races (you’re permitted to take your pick — these churches do allow you a choice, so there’s that — but it has to be something non-white:  Cambodian, let’s say, is perfectly OK in the eyes of God; so are South American zombo like Chavez in Venezuela, or Dravidian for example, just to give an idea — you can build on that:  all of those are acceptible but Negro and Australian Aborigine are best, as they fulfill what God wants for us best, according to these churches.  You see, God really wants us, in His heart of hearts, to be Negroes or Abos BUT ... he’ll accept stuff like Puerto Rican or Burmese — good old God, he IS trying to make it easy for us ...). 

What I’m hoping for is for a Kinist branch of Catholicism to emerge, as I like the Catholic religion and don’t want to be forced to leave.  (Hell I’ll even join the Jews if it’ll keep me from turning into something like
this ... I mean, let’s not scare people, OK, this is getting serious!  Maybe that guy running for mayor of Strassburg in that photo is understandable when they had this float in that city’s carnival a couple of months ago ... [ * ] Either that or ... did they film “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” anywhere near Strassburg?  Something couldn’t fallen off the flying saucer, you never know ... )

I like the Catholic religion but leave I will, rather than change myself, my children and grandchildren and all my posterity till the end of time into Negroes.  I like Catholicism, I’ll do lots of things for it, even put up with that nun on The Eternal Word Network, “Mother Something-or-other,” but that I won’t do:  the Catholics will have to get another schtick.  The Catholics have plenty of theologians who are lying idle with nothing to do, no big theories to work on since everything big got taken care of centuries ago.  Let them be put to work on this:  a non-race-replacement Catholicism.

To change topics:  Correct me but isn’t the whole subject of secession indirectly related to the conscious formation of microcommunities?  Here’s a press-release from a secessionist organization, the League of the South whose web-site traffic has surged over recent months (they claim officially to be aracial but I don’t know if I believe that; but either way they’re very good folks over there, the best):

THE REBIRTH OF DIXIENET

Recent statistical data indicate that as the political and social outlook becomes more uncertain, the public is taking a serious look at the viability of political devolution and the message of the League of the South

LS News Service - 15 April AD 2008

KILLEN, AL (LSNS) - The figures for website visitors to the L[eague of the] S[outh] National website, DixieNet.Org, reveal a sharp increase during the month of March 2008 as well as the early days of April, according to official statistical data compiled by the DixieNet website project team. “We are very pleased with this latest report,” said LS President, Michael Hill.  Dr Hill continued, “DixieNet traffic has been on a steady increase since October 2007 without any sign of slowing down. This trend indicates to us that the public is taking a serious look at our message of political devolution in these very uncertain times.” Thanks to public interest generated from the Second North American Secessionist Convention and the League of the South National Conference held in Chattanooga, TN, October was one of the most productive months for the League in recent memory and has served as the catalyst for an ever growing flow of traffic to DixieNet.

“While we are excited about our progress thus far, we are in no way prepared to rest upon our laurels,” said Terry Compton, DixieNet website project leader.  “In fact,” Compton continues, “Mike Crane, Mike Tuggle, and I are working harder no w than ever before to make DixieNet the gold standard for online public relations, not only among Southern Movement websites, but within the realm of social and political activism in general.”

DixieNet.Org boasts a hefty repository of content ranging from scholarly essays on states’ rights, Southern cultural resurgence, economic issues, and education, to articles on the modern trend toward devolution as a viable means of regaining the political, social, and cultural right of self determination for peoples world wide.

For additional information about the League of the South, DixieNet, or how to advertise your business with the website, please visit http://www.dixienet.org.

______

( * Yes that float depicts what you think:  interracial “sexual congress” is the polite word, I believe?  [Not “interracial,” that’s never polite, I realize that, I meant “sexual congress” was polite.] Made into an enormous carnival float that took its place among all the other carnival floats in the city of Strassburg, France, two months ago.  Believe it.  It happened.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on April 15, 2008, 12:57 PM | #

Here it is on YouTube (at about the one-minute-thirty-seconds mark):  the Negro is animated with an up-and-down motion just so the pelvic thrusting action isn’t left to the imagination of the poor Strassburg carnival-goers.  Whoever shot this footage probably didn’t realize right away what he was seeing as the float passed, so didn’t capture the humping action much, but there are a couple of seconds where it’s unmistakable.  For Yanks:  these pre-Lent carnivals are a big deal in European cities, like New York City’s Thanksgiving Day parade.  This wasn’t an insignificant outrage.  You can read comments on French-language blogs such as that someone should have attacked the float with molotov cocktails.  People are pretty shocked.  Maybe this will wake them up.  (Frankly though, when you think about it, if the face of that Strassburg mayoral candidate didn’t wake them up, I’m starting to fear nothing will.)

Posted by Fr. John on April 15, 2008, 01:41 PM | #

“I like the Catholic religion but leave I will, rather than change myself, my children and grandchildren and all my posterity till the end of time into Negroes.  “ - Fred Scrooby

This is why I left Roman ‘Catholi-schism’ in the 1970’s. I could see what they had done via Vatican II, and each decade I see more and more clearly the evil that is the Roman communion- sorry to be blunt, but in America, things are MORE like what they WILL be in Britain, if they are not already! After then hitching my star to Anglicanism, I watched it devolve in the wake of the ‘female presbyter’ issue in the decades that followed, until we now have Cantuar saying that sharia law is a possible option for Britain!!!

I became Orthodox out of a source of ‘where else can I go?’, but decided NOT to join the ‘Big Three’ groups over here in the USA, as they are only one generation away from embracing the Multiculturalist heresy, (which is merely a false ‘incarnationalist’ offshoot of the ‘Pan-Heresy of Ecumenicism) and already- within twenty years, I am seeing an attempt to drive the ‘ethnic Orthodox’ churches into ‘offering the gospel to the Black and the Hispanic,’ and fornicating against their nationalist vision of the People of God, to ‘bring in the unwashed’- puke.

If Christianity was ANYTHING, as Belloc said, it was White and European. “Europe is the Faith, the Faith, Europe.” When you read articles such as this [http://cambriawillnotyield.blogspot.com/2008/04/clan-europe.html] you KNOW, you REMEMBER what REAL Christianity is/was all about.

NOTHING ELSE SUFFICES, NOTHING ELSE FEEDS.

As an example of the evil that lies so deeply within Rome, that nothing appears to be able to bring it out of her error, please read the 22 posts on the subject [’Something wicked this way comes’] over at my blog. [http://thewhitechrist.wordpress.com/]

The sodomite clergy sex scandals are not a blip on the radar screen, THEY ARE NOVUS ORDO ROME. The book “Goodbye, Good men” clearly outlines what many who stay in the RC communion KNOW, but are unwilling to do anything about, because at least THREE generations have learned this NOVUS ORDO ‘Whore of Babylon’ theology at her breast.

The only hope is for Europeans to restore a WESTERN RITE within, and yet APART from, Byzantine Orthodoxy, which is seeking to jump into bed with the Pope, which only means her death, and the end of the world.......

Posted by Peter on April 15, 2008, 03:04 PM | #

Fred Scrooby i love your posts....most of the time well done. Oh and i had a look at the youtube video...its true! and was disturbing.
I don’t think you can be “Christian” and still talk about “race replacement” and all that. I personally am atheist but my family is Catholic and Pentecostal.

Posted by onlooker on April 15, 2008, 05:36 PM | #

The only hope for Europeans is to completely scrap the fiat monetary system and go back on the gold standard...... no wait .....did I say the gold standard? Yes, I guess I did. I meant to say the ‘LEAD STANDARD’ ... If you can get my drift?

Posted by torgrim on April 15, 2008, 06:17 PM | #

Fr. John,

“I am seeing an attempt to drive the ‘ethnic Orthodox’ churches into ‘offering the gospel to the Black and Hispanic"…

As one that has friends of Greek heritage, living in America, and how these folk uphold their culture and Church, along with pride of their ethnicity, I will be very surprised if the multi-culti’s have much success, as these folk have a long history with the Middle East and may have some resistance to the virulence of race replacement.
I hope I am right, we will see…

Respectfully,

Torgrim

Posted by onlooker on April 15, 2008, 07:33 PM | #

Fred, please help me out on this!!!!!!!!!

This struggle we are in isn’t Catholic vs Protestant, Orthodox vs whatever. The struggle is leftist (Jew) politics vs normal politics. THERE IS NO ROOM OR PLACE FOR THE WHITE RACE IN LEFTIST POLITICS!!!!!!!!!

Posted by onlooker on April 15, 2008, 08:19 PM | #

Can anyone make a case where leftist politicians—no matter what race—are pro preservation of the white-race?

Posted by onlooker on April 15, 2008, 08:22 PM | #

Is John McCain for the preservation of a white majority in the USA?

Posted by onlooker on April 15, 2008, 08:31 PM | #

James Bowery,

Is Ron Paul routing for the preservation of a white majority in the USA? If he is, please direct me to the evidence!

Posted by onlooker on April 15, 2008, 09:15 PM | #

“ THERE IS NO ROOM OR PLACE FOR THE WHITE RACE IN LEFTIST POLITICS!!!!!!!!! “

In other words, they want us off the planrt.