Miscegenating Female College Students

Posted by Bud White on February 18, 2007, 04:47 PM | #

“Indeed, when the devout Marquis of Pombol was Portugal’s Governor of Brazil, he, with his monarch’s approval, offered land grants to Portuguese males who married (in righteous Catholic matrimony) indigenous women. Thus did the vital approbation of the Catholic Church aid the Portuguese government’s official miscegenation policy."-- Al Ross

Thanks Al, Indeed miscegenation in Latin America has its Christian roots, but that was then and this is now. Back then, the white-race wasn’t under any threat of being genetically replaced. Whites were the most numerous people on the planet. It wasn’t until the later half of the twentieth century it became evident whites were in danger of being ethnically cleansed off the planet.

The population explosion of third-world non-white primitives facilitated by western technology is a recent phenomenon. The spill-over of the bumper crop of non-whites into our countries is the the problem. We as whites are being drowned by a flood of non-white immigrants.

My belief is that a combination of rapacious international corporations, international financiers, and a “certain tribe” that has undue influence, is dictating the flow of third-world non-white primitives into white nations for malevolent purposes.

The affect of this non-white immigration is resulting in a kinder gentler form of genocide directed specifically at the white gene pool.

In modern times, Christianity plays but a small ancillary role in all this.

Btw-- the Catholic Church is fighting to keep Turkey out of the EU.

Posted by The Ordure of Coug on March 10, 2007, 07:59 AM | #

Thought I’d drop in and present the forum’s Daddies with more troubling information from the last academic year. The following took place in the small People’s Republic of Moscow, Idaho. At least 20 women were involved.  I strongly suspect that twice to thrice that number actually played the mudshark to African Kanay Mubita, with students from the University of Idaho having a very significant role. Pity the present and future husbands of these little whores.

The University of Idaho.  Almost entirely White.  Imagine - that is, if your mind has the strength to handle it - what is likely to happen when your Precious Little Homecoming Queen who is bored to death with Podunkville and Larry Flattop is sent to USC or UCLA.

Okay you “revolutionary” Daddyo’s, enough teasing. Grab your Meerschaums and reflect on this:

Latah County Man Charged with Spreading HIV

By Contributing Writer, 12-23-05

Insulated by geography, Moscow and the Palouse have been largely insulated from many of the troubles of larger metropolitan areas. That all changed with the arrest of Kanay Mubita on December 7. Mubita, 31, has been charged with “Transfer of Bodily Fluid Which May Contain the HIV Virus,” a felony under Idaho code.

Originally charged with one count, six more women have come forward alleging sexual contact with Mubita, bringing the total counts to seven in two separate cases. Three other women have made contact with Moscow Police but have not made formal statements. Authorities have received information about nine other potential victims who have not contacted authorities. All of the women are between the ages of 21 and 37 and are identified by initials only. Mubita faces a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and a $15,000 fine on each count.

In a short interview at the Latah County Jail, where he is being held on a $20,000 bond, Mubita, who is divorced, denied the allegations, stating he didn’t even know some of the women. “I don’t have unprotected sex,” he said. He went on to say he doesn’t engage in sex outside of a relationship.

He also stated he always used a condom with his ex-girlfriend, who brought the original charge against him. Authorities say he stated he is the father of his ex-girlfriend’s child; Mubita said no paternity has been established. He said it was scheduled for later this month, but now he wants to postpone it until his legal battle is over.

Mubita stated he believes his ex-girlfriend is bringing the charge because of arguments they’ve had. He went on to say the NAACP had been contacted because he feels he’s being singled out because he is black.

When authorities first contacted Mubita on December 6 and questioned him about having been notified of his HIV status, he denied having been notified; he also denied having sex with anyone but his ex-wife. While being interviewed by one officer, another called a health department official who stated Mubita had been informed several times of his HIV status. Police then asked him to make a written statement. Mubita asked to go home and write it; police agreed.

The next day, police received a call from Mubita’s caseworker, who stated he was upset about Tuesday’s interview and asked them to check on him. When officers arrived at his home, he stated he had tested positive for HIV.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled for December 20 at 9 a.m. before Magistrate William Hamlett. Charles Kovis, Latah County Public Defender, will represent Mubita. The Moscow-North Central District Health Department is recommending confidential HIV counseling and testing to anyone who has had sexual contact with Mubita. If the initial test results are negative, testing should be repeated every three months until six after the last exposure.

According to a health department release, humans are the only reservoir for the HIV virus. Transmission occurs by sexual contact, sharing contaminated needles, transfusion of infected blood and blood products and by transplantation of infected organs and tissues. Health care workers are required to report all cases to Public Health and an epidemiologist investigates each case. The epidemiologist then identifies and counsels any person who may have been exposed to the virus.

---------------------------------------------------------

Man may have spread HIV to 20

Source: The Spokesman Review, December 16, 2005

As many as 20 people have been identified as potential victims of a Moscow man who allegedly had sexual contact without informing partners he had tested positive for HIV, according to court records. The allegations have triggered an alert from the North Central District Health Department, recommending confidential counseling and HIV testing for all people who had sexual contact with Kanay A. Mubita.

Posted by The Ordure of Coug on March 10, 2007, 10:29 AM | #

Desmond Jones writes: “He (Yancey) found that European females were less likely to date interracially than their male counterparts.”

----------

I don’t buy it, Desmond.

Let’s be clear:  “Dating” has been a euphemism for “sex” since the mid-sixties, at least.

Despite the fact that there is less stigma attached to interracial sex, in sexual matters men lie about quantity and women lie about anything that could reflect badly upon them. Men overstate experience, women understate it. If more women admit to interracial sex, it doesn’t follow that the others are truthful. There is no doubt in my mind that Yancey’s difference for European females and males is inflated, if not reversed. The NOW would have his head otherwise. Even “liberated” women of egalitarian bent have a huge stake in presenting themselves as virtuous women to be placed on pedestals.  Nevertheless, despite this minor sleight of hand Yancey’s overall results are closer to the truth.

How does a “liberated” actress play the part of a strong woman?  By acting like a traditional “bitch” before kicking the man’s ass and defying other physical laws. The point is when it comes to men and women some things never change.

Posted by Euro on October 07, 2009, 06:06 PM | #

For Coug,if he’s still with us,and all the naive doubters of Coug’s assertions.( From the execrable site View From The Right)

The results of importing black students into a college town

A police detective has written this article for VFR. Some details have been been altered or left out to conceal the identity of the city being described.
I am a police officer in the upper northwest and have been a cop for 16 years. Like many in my current community, I came here originally to attend college. Our city is small and predominantly white, and the university population is mostly kids from white, upper middle class families.
Our university tries its damnedest to recruit and attract minorities, but the demographics seem to remain constant. Our local community college is a different story. They have been recruiting athletes from large urban areas for years and have contributed significantly to our community’s young black population. It seems for every young black male recruited to play basketball or football, several male friends follow him from his community to ours. Subsequently, there are a large number of young, non-enrolled, unemployed black males living in our community.
One of the most obvious effects of this trend is the ghettoization of one of our older student neighborhoods. In the last twenty years, this multi-square block area has become almost exclusively subsidized housing, attracting the rest of our community’s dysfunctional welfare class. This neighborhood abuts our university’s east side and still houses many students. The predictable result of this is a significant increase in black on white crime.
These crimes take on several distinct forms. The most prominent are the random strong-arm (or armed) robberies in which a single white student is confronted by a group of black males and robbed. The net gain of these robberies is often only a few dollars or at best a cell phone, however, most are accompanied by an assault of some sort. Many times these assaults result in serious injuries. These robberies occur when some student is walking alone, to or from campus, often through this same area.
When I have responded to this neighborhood to handle a call, I quickly learned that I could expect absolutely no cooperation from the blacks I encountered. Those that were not openly hostile would lie about whatever they might have seen to protect another without compunction. I find this particular characteristic fascinating. Even the most hard-core, white-supremicist prison gang parolee will display the body language that shows discomfort with lying. Many will tell you that they can not answer a question before they will lie. But almost without exception, blacks can lie to your face without the slightest indication of an internal moral conflict.
On the opposite side of campus is a student neighborhood that contains most of the fraternities and sororities. This neighborhood is the epicenter of the weekend party scene with thousands of students roaming around in search of bars and parties until the early morning hours. When I was a student in the early eighties, this scene was relatively peaceful and rarely required the presence of law enforcement. In the last ten to fifteen years, however, the atmosphere has changed to an alcohol fueled, violence prone environment requiring a great number of officers to keep the peace.
Another significant change is the racial make-up of this scene. Once exclusively university students, now has mixed in large groups of black or Hispanic males, many of which are local gang members. Ironically, this demographic is almost always welcomed by the majority white student population. As recently as fifteen years ago, most of the loud music emanating from the bars and parties was white rock and roll, it is now almost exclusively black rap and hip-hop.
The allure of black ghetto street culture amongst the white middle-class youth is a significant factor in this dynamic. There is an almost child-like expectation that the affection for that culture by the majority group will somehow be reciprocated when it plays out on street level, face-to-face encounters. It almost never is. It is amusing in a cynical way to see the repeated shock expressed by these white college kids when that affection is met with unrepentant violence. Whether it is the white male student who is beaten down for taking issue with a black male making a pass at his girlfriend, or the girl herself who is assaulted for rebuking such an advance, these kids are often attacked for just looking at a group of black males the wrong way.
As a cop, I’ve often encountered these victims who, out of frustration, will express their anger and humiliation with an occasional racial epithet. This accomplishes little and allows other white kids to look on and express scorn at their racist attitude. Most often, however, they direct their anger at us for not keeping them safe.
It’s so richly ironic that these upper middle class white college students will often stand on the street corners yelling “F*ck the police!” as officers patrol this neighborhood. They do it to get the attention of their friends and prove their “street cred” to the crowd. Yet, when they become the victims of this random violence by the same black kids they’ve been trying to impress, they blame the police. If officers ever have a black kid detained for any reason, you can count on the white kids to harass the officers and claim they are racists for doing so. I actually used to be shocked myself by this behavior, but no more.
The other black on white crime amongst the college kids that is often not reported is the home-invasion robbery. Many of these upper middle class white kids are small time growers or dealers in marijuana. This activity is very open due to light penalties for possession and a movement to emulate California’s medical marijuana laws. Inevitably they will share or sell some marijuana with a black kid they meet socially. A short time later a group of several black males will kick their door down, brandish guns and demand the marijuana. We’ve had kids shot during these robberies and yet for everyone we investigate, probably three go unreported for obvious reasons. I’ve had black males that I’ve interrogated admit that they consider our town a target-rich environment for robbery and burglary, especially in the student neighborhoods.
You have written before about trends in black on white rape. While we have a significant number of sexual assaults, mostly involving significant alcohol consumption, I have not seen a similar racial component in these cases. This may be due to a factor I find equally troubling.
There seems to be a never ending supply of young white middle-class college girls who will enter into dating relationships with these lower-class, un-enrolled, unemployed, thuggish black males. I’m sure the allure has a lot to do with the popularity of this type of male in pop culture these days; but I still shake my head because many of these relationships end in domestic violence.
The pattern is usually the same. A few days into the relationship the black male will often move in with the female. She will then begin to financially support him. He will often take over use of her vehicle, forcing her to do without for days at a time. He will often take her checks or credit cards and run her into debt. It is only when he continues to womanize that she will take issue and confront him. This often results in an assault. One would think that people would make rational observations about a certain group’s behavior, especially if it impacts them personally in a negative way, and make adjustments in their own actions and associations. However, the liberal dogma prevents this self preservation. Subsequently my community and many others continue to be target-rich environments.