Looking at this plot I’m wondering if the message is that there’s an Ashkenazi in the Tomato Pile, or a dearth of Swedes in the Matzoh bin.  Elaboration?

Cluters 1 and 2 can be discribed as “cluster f**ks.”

No problemo, Old Guy.  KMac is the MVP of White Nationalism as far as I’m concerned.  It was the least I could do.

Not every credible “NW” scholar thinks so.

What makes him credible? He is self-contradictory and it almost seems like he didn’t read CoC or did so rather poorly.

I won’t do a point-by-point on this, but I’ll take on some of the rather glaring issues here:

There is a simple, but, I believe, devastating counter-argument to MacDonald’s theory. If the Jewish/Gentile dynamic that MacDonald outlines is rooted in these groups’ biological natures, and Jews have extensive powers to convert Gentiles to multiculturalism, why didn’t anything like multiculturalism emerge before the 20th century?

MacDonald never made the claim that converting gentile societies to multiculturalism was a “biological trait”. MacDonald claims that such manifestations as Boasian anthropology, Frankfurt school sociology, and open immigration policies is a way for Jews to relieve themselves of the burden of anti-Semitism that is associated with nations that have an overwhelming majority of whites.

Jews have been present in the West since Roman times, but Gentiles in medieval European societies did not believe in white guilt, nor did they think diversity was a strength, despite the presence of Jewish minorities—indeed, multiculturalism was not only non-existent in medieval Europe, it was unthinkable.

The United States is a unique conception in that it is very democratic, libertine, and allows nearly anyone to come in and influence it politically and economically. The old monarchies and aristocracies, while often corrupt, did not allow Jewish radicals to come in and dictate demographic policy. In fact, it was through the Jewish Bolshevist revolution in which the Russian aristocracy is murdered and Jews ascend to power, allowing Jewish ideology to take a foothold.

I will end it there, but I find this “response” to MacDonald to be of rather poor quality.

MacDonald extensively documents how gentiles themselves have failed to assert ethnocentrism and does not merely “blame the Jews” as “The Realist” alleges (hence my second sentence above).

And the Twentieth Century also brought women’s suffrage to the Eurosphere.

After the Civil war, was it the Jews or Gentiles that blocked Abraham Lincoln’s plan to repatriate slaves back to Africa? I my be wrong, but my recollection tells me it was exclusively Gentiles that were the force behind advocating for freed slaves to be allowed to remain in America.

If Lincoln had not been assassinated, it is quite conceivable there would have been a very different reconstruction given his stance on repatriation.  From “The Writings of Abraham Lincoln” V06:

There is much to encourage you. For the sake of your race you should sacrifice something of your present comfort for the purpose of being as grand in that respect as the white people. It is a cheering thought throughout life that something can be done to ameliorate the condition of those who have been subject to the hard usages of the world. It is difficult to make a man miserable while he feels he is worthy of himself and claims kindred to the great God who made him. In the American Revolutionary war sacrifices were made by men engaged in it, but they were cheered by the future. General WASHINGTON himself endured greater physical hardships than if he had remained a British subject, yet he was a happy man because he had engaged in benefiting his race, in doing something for the children of his neighbors, having none of his own.

The colony of Liberia has been in existence a long time. In a certain sense it is a success. The old President of Liberia, Roberts, has just been with me--the first time I ever saw him. He says they have within the bounds of that colony between three and four hundred thousand people, or more than in some of our old States, such as Rhode Island or Delaware, or in some of our newer States, and less than in some of our larger ones. They are not all American colonists or their descendants. Something less than 12,000 have been sent thither from this country. Many of the original settlers have died; yet, like people else-where, their offspring outnumber those deceased. The question is, if the colored people are persuaded to go anywhere, why not there?

One reason for unwillingness to do so is that some of you would rather remain within reach of the country of your nativity. I do not know how much attachment you may have toward our race. It does not strike me that you have the greatest reason to love them. But still you are attached to them, at all events.

The place I am thinking about for a colony is in Central America. It is nearer to us than Liberia not much more than one fourth as far as Liberia, and within seven days’ run by steamers. Unlike Liberia, it is a great line of travel--it is a highway. The country is a very excellent one for any people, and with great natural resources and advantages, and especially because of the similarity of climate with your native soil, thus being suited to your physical condition. The particular place I have in view is to be a great highway from the Atlantic or Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean, and this particular place has all the advantages for a colony. On both sides there are harbors--among the finest in the world. Again, there is evidence of very rich coal-mines. A certain amount of coal is valuable in any country. Why I attach so much importance to coal is, it will afford an opportunity to the inhabitants for immediate employment till they get ready to settle permanently in their homes. If you take colonists where there is no good landing, there is a bad show; and so where there is nothing to cultivate and of which to make a farm. But if something is started so that you can get your daily bread as soon as reach you there, it is a great advantage. Coal land is the best thing I know of with which to commence an enterprise. To return--you have been talked to upon this subject, and told that a speculation is intended by gentlemen who have an interest in the country, including the coal-mines. We have been mistaken all our lives if we do not know whites, as well as blacks, look to their self-interest. Unless among those deficient of intellect, everybody you trade with makes something. You meet with these things here and everywhere. If such persons have what will be an advantage to them, the question is whether it cannot be made of advantage to you. You are intelligent, and know that success does not so much depend on external help as on self-reliance. Much, therefore, depends upon yourselves. As to the coal-mines, I think I see the means available for your self-reliance. I shall, if I get a sufficient number of you engaged, have provision made that you shall not be wronged.

My opinion is, as far as white blame is concerned, is with the rise of classical liberalism and enlightenment philosophies. However, if you compare the ideologies associated with gentile classical liberalism with that of radical Jewish ones, I think you will find that the Jewish ones are far more perilous and destructive than those associated with gentile classical liberal causes. It is merely the openness and general tendency towards liberalized government and social policy that paved the way towards permissiveness of Jewish political/cultural manipulation.

why didn’t anything like multiculturalism emerge before the 20th century

It did.

We have besides these men—descended by blood from our ancestors—among us perhaps half our people who are not descendants at all of these men, they are men who have come from Europe—German, Irish, French and Scandinavian—men that have come from Europe themselves, or whose ancestors have come hither and settled here, finding themselves our equals in all things. If they look back through this history to trace their connection with those days by blood, they find they have none, they cannot carry themselves back into that glorious epoch and make themselves feel that they are part of us, but when they look through that old Declaration of Independence they find that those old men say that “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,” and then they feel that that moral sentiment taught in that day evidences their relation to those men, that it is the father of all moral principle in them, and that they have a right to claim it as though they were blood of the blood, and flesh of the flesh of the men who wrote that Declaration, (loud and long continued applause) and so they are. That is the electric cord in that Declaration that links the hearts of patriotic and liberty-loving men together, that will link those patriotic hearts as long as the love of freedom exists in the minds of men throughout the world.

[From “Electric Cord” Speech (1858), in Lincoln, The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. II, ed. Roy P. Basler (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953), 499-500.]

Canadian Prime Minister R.B. Bennett…

House of Commons Debates, June 7, 1928, pp. 3925-7.

“Read the history of the United States, read what is written in every magazine in that country by thoughtful men, and you will find that the principle of the melting pot has failed; and they are quite apprehensive. Every thoughtful man in the United States, every keen observer, every man who travels, every author, everyone who shapes and moulds public opinion in the universities and in the great foundations-all these are bewailing the fact that uncontrolled immigration has been permitted into that country, to such an extent that there is now in the United States a polyglot population, without any distinctive civilization, and one about which many of them are in great despair . . .

William N. Vaile of Colorado…

“Let me emphasize here that the restrictionists of Congress do not claim that the ‘Nordic’ race, or even the Anglo-Saxon race, is the best race in the world. Let us concede, in all fairness that the Czech is a more sturdy laborer…that the Jew is the best businessman in the world, and that the Italian has…a spiritual exaltation and an artistic creative sense which the Nordic rarely attains. Nordics need not be vain about their own qualifications. It well behooves them to be humble.

“What we do claim is that the northern European and particularly Anglo-Saxons made this country. Oh, yes; the others helped. But… [t]hey came to this country because it was already made as an Anglo-Saxon commonwealth. They added to it, they often enriched it, but they did not make it, and they have not yet greatly changed it.

“We are determined that they shall not...It is a good country. It suits us. And what we assert is that we are not going to surrender it to somebody else or allow other people, no matter what their merits, to make it something different. If there is any changing to be done, we will do it ourselves.” [Cong. Rec., April 8, 1924, 5922]

With respect James, as JR, KMac and others point out, some groups have influence beyond their calcuable EGI.

Here are the JWH entries I refer to above:

http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/04/outrageous.html

http://westbiop.blogspot.com/2008/04/other-shoe-is-dropping.html