Muslim rape wave in Sweden

Posted by Dharma Chakra on January 22, 2009, 01:04 AM | #

Cultural training and sensitivity courses need to be taken and graduated in with honors before anyone should be allowed to immigrate anywhere.

Is there any reason why a citizen of any country should not speak it’s national language?  Yet there a many immigrant men from Eastern countries who will not allow their womenfolk to learn the national language, obtain drivers licenses or become employed.  They do not want their women to assimilate because they want to keep tight control on them.

Anyone who wishes to immigrate to any country must know the language first and show that they are employed or capable of being employed.  No government handouts.  I bet just that alone would cut the numbers in half.

Posted by Freethinker on January 22, 2009, 02:06 AM | #

Posted by Barker Black on January 21, 2009, 05:43 PM |

Islam by itself is not the problem. It is the white Marxists, globalists/transnational progressives, and EU bureaucrats who facilitate Islam’s establishment and dominance in the West.  This is who we must target. I absolutely believe that we must first set our sights on the current power structure. It must be toppled and it must be replaced, by any means required. No need to go into details here and at this time, about what needs to be done. I too predict civil war, and if there were a way for me to hasten it, I would. But then again, the traitors in our midst are accomplishing this goal all by themselves, without any help from chaps like me.

The vile fanatical and intolerant nature of islam is in fact the problem, but it would not have become ours for a long time had not the above named in your entry set out to destroy the nation states of Europe, drowning them with people from a culture so extreme and different that integration even over a longer span of time is out of the question, thus in the long run giving rise to seperatism and the division of nations. The muslims have declared their unwillingness to integrate and adapt and instead demand Western society to accommodate and become more consitent with islam and sharia. However, I agree with your strategy that it is through politics we get to gain the most, as in Denmark, where the success of Dansk Folkeparti has changed things drastically in favour for the critics of multicultural madness. I too hate the treacherous ethnic self-loathing leftest bastards and quasi-humanists with their pathetic utilitarian dreams of a global Utopia forged through revolt, revolution and the loss of national identity and borders.

Posted by Dharma Chakra on January 22, 2009, 05:28 AM | #

Several thousand Muslim Turks immigrated to the US in the late 1800s and early 1900s to work as coal miners in Appalachia and they assimilated just fine.  Something has changed between then and now.  We need to figure out what that is and change back.

Posted by Freethinker on January 22, 2009, 02:09 PM | #

Posted by Dharma Chakra on January 22, 2009, 05:28 AM | #

Several thousand Muslim Turks immigrated to the US in the late 1800s and early 1900s to work as coal miners in Appalachia and they assimilated just fine.  Something has changed between then and now.  We need to figure out what that is and change back.

Not all Muslims are destroying the country and it seems like Secularism is the common factor.
The Iranians that fled from the madman Khomeini in the 70´s and Turks from the “European” parts of Turkey are well integrated, produvtive Muslim groups in Sweden that never cause any problems. For some reason it is always Arab, Somali and Bosniak names that come up when violent crimes are reported .

Posted by Dharma Chakra on January 22, 2009, 07:25 PM | #

Regarding the people who fled Iran, and are still fleeing, many of them are Parsis, or Zorastrians.
They are amongst one of the most industrious groups in the world but their numbers are small and declining because they do not allow out-marriage.  A child from an out-marriage cannot be considered a true Parsi amongst the Orthodox.

Another group that fled Iran are the B’hais. 

Another group are Sunni Muslims, the secular minded ones especially.  Practically the entire population of University students in Iran would flee if they could.

Some Shias also have left.

Iranians are proud of their ancient culture but most tend to hate their government and the religious fanatics with a passion.

It’s a shame that their government has to keep people their by force, basically only allowing the religious minorities to leave in an effort to make it an entirely Shia state.  But even the majority of Shias do not like what is going on there.

Posted by Kurt on January 22, 2009, 07:31 PM | #

Sweden loves the mulatto rapper with his Swede/Finnish mother, all those WHITE SWEDISH GIRLS drooling over him.

In the US the rapists and so on are christians.

So is Christianity the reason for the rapes, the murders, the assaults?

Sweden is a very unwholesome society like most of Europe.
Enjoy your PEOPLE OF COLOR but don’t blame their religion, I don’t blame Christ for the mestizos gunning down our White brothers in San Diego

Posted by Freethinker on January 22, 2009, 09:41 PM | #

Posted by Kurt on January 22, 2009, 07:31 PM | #

Sweden loves the mulatto rapper with his Swede/Finnish mother, all those WHITE SWEDISH GIRLS drooling over him.

In the US the rapists and so on are christians.

So is Christianity the reason for the rapes, the murders, the assaults?

Sweden is a very unwholesome society like most of Europe.
Enjoy your PEOPLE OF COLOR but don’t blame their religion, I don’t blame Christ for the mestizos gunning down our White brothers in San Diego

Your Ali G imitation is lousy. Go sober up!

Posted by Al Spanker on January 22, 2009, 09:49 PM | #

What typical semitic CRAP, tiresome the same trolls on every forum where White survival is discussed pushing the jews agenda of hating Muslims.

Fewer White survivalists are falling for it.

Go kiss REV WRIGHT if you love them so much.

Posted by Freethinker on January 24, 2009, 05:55 PM | #

Posted by Al Spanker on January 22, 2009, 09:49 PM | #

What typical semitic CRAP, tiresome the same trolls on every forum where White survival is discussed pushing the jews agenda of hating Muslims.

Fewer White survivalists are falling for it.

Go kiss REV WRIGHT if you love them so much.

Poor little pinhead! It´s not the Jews that are raping our women and trying to turn our societies into islamized shitholes modelled on homelands governed by the laws of an insane child molesting prophet. Bugger off back to your Jew-hating Nazi forum, here the topic is the degenerating effects of muslim immigration on Western society.

Posted by Emma K. on January 30, 2009, 01:03 AM | #

You’ll have to forgive me if I’m wrong, but this screams propaganda to me, whether it’s completely made up or exaggerated to create an impression.  The whole “the bad people who don’t look like us must be locked up because they’re raping our women” is a classic story that’s been tried in a variety of places, not to mention slavery-era United States.  This is not to say that particular incidents do not happen, but do we really have a trend here? I suspect it’s not. 
---
Emma K.
San Diego personal injury lawyer

Posted by q on January 30, 2009, 01:47 AM | #

“This is not to say that particular incidents do not happen ...”

Maybe so, Emma, but you have to admit the religion of Islam is pretty sick.

E.g.: When a chick shows a little ankle in an Islamic country, she gets beaten or worse. If a poor Islamic guy acually sees a chick’s ankle, god forbid, he’s in deep trouble too! WTF kind of freakin’ insanity is that?

Wahhabi Islam is the exact opposite of modern-secular-liberalism. But they both have one thing in common: they are volitional mental disorders.

Posted by Lurker on January 30, 2009, 04:38 PM | #

Freethinker - you have to ask just how these muslims got to live amongst us in the first place.

It didnt just happen on its own.

Posted by Freethinker2308 on February 04, 2009, 02:20 AM | #

Posted by Emma K. on January 30, 2009, 01:03 AM | #

You’ll have to forgive me if I’m wrong, but this screams propaganda to me, whether it’s completely made up or exaggerated to create an impression.  The whole “the bad people who don’t look like us must be locked up because they’re raping our women” is a classic story that’s been tried in a variety of places, not to mention slavery-era United States.  This is not to say that particular incidents do not happen, but do we really have a trend here? I suspect it’s not. 
---
Emma K.
San Diego personal injury lawyer

1/2

Oh I see, now everyone´s an expert! Well Emma, you are entitled to your opinion, so too to your misconception, it is fully understood, after all, you don´t reside here. This is not propaganda Emma! I suggest you take a look at these articles by a few quite academically qualified people. I translated freely, the Google bar translation offered in the links below may to some extent be unsuccessful, in that case I suggest pasting the uninterpreted or faulty text into a translation engine of own choice.

By Lone Nörgaard, assistant professor, cand.mag Frederiksberg and Steen Raaschou, photografer, Köbenhavn

Can we as a society tolerate that it is so cheap to destroy a young woman’s life?

Asks today’s columnists.

Is there anything that any longer can incite people? We will have to make due and answer for ourselves-and yes, there is still much that can shock us, and get us to act for example to write columns and try to organize forces among like-minded people.

One of the phenomena at the moment and this deserves full attention, is the serious crime against women who are raped. This applies to rape in general and gang rape in particular. This is an offence of such a serious nature that it must be dealt with harshly. Not least because it is a type of abuse that is increasing in numbers and must be seen in close connection to the failure of immigration and integration policies.

We can not solve all the world’s problems, but we refuse to silently watch from the sidelines, while our society gradually is undermined by a culture and belief system that does not count women as equally valid citizens. And accusations of racism and xenophobia works no longer on us. They are moralists, set on the destruction of young womens lives. It is a documented fact that young immigrants are grotesquely over-represented in both the single and gang rape cases. The most recently published police statistics for the year 2001 looked like this: Immigrant participation for the entire country: 67 percent, in the Copenhagen area: 76 percent. The publication aroused protests and we have not since then seen ethnically specified rape statistics.

Sometimes it helps to keep the subject of the analysis at a distance to create a factual, non-emotional picture and rape in particular is a sensitive and emotive subject. Therefore, we in this column want to describe the (mass) rapes committed by young immigrant men, not in Denmark, but in Sweden, where these crimes have adopted an almost epidemic nature. Denmark has about 500 reported rapes a year, Sweden, 2 500. Police, Women’s advisory services and Aftonbladet (Largest evening newspaper in Sweden) estimated in 2002 that the real figure is ten times higher, ie, 25 000 rapes on mainly Swedish women a year. We let the figure stand for a moment . Would Denmark have relatively the same frequency of rape, we would have around 1 500 notified, and perhaps a total of 15 000 rapes a year. Luckily we don´t, not yet.

In Sweden, they have unfortunately managed to a higher degree, keep the lid on the immigration debate and immigration critics are by definition “xenophobic” or even racist. With a from the top encouraged “state feminism”, which has widespread support in the media and parliament (six out of seven parliamentary members calls themselves “feminists"), one would think that there was a special understanding for vulnerable women, but it is far from that. Only 5 percent of the reported rape cases go to prosecution, and only a fraction of them lead to a conviction. When a raped woman finally has reached so far in the process the sentences are
so mild that no one recognizes them. The judiciary system is not at all in tune with “the new Sweden”, but is still predominantly based on gentleness, treatment and rehabilitation.

It should be superfluous to mention that many traumatized women do not have the energy to make a report. Basically, it must be noted that rape in Sweden is completely free of prosecution
for criminals. The risk of a penalty is small, very small, and therefore the official state feminism sounds infinitely hollow. The old concept of “kvinnofrid” (sanctuary for women) seems to belong to a distant past.

We claim, and it can be documented with numerous articles, books and statistics, that ethnicity and culture are of relevance in criminal statistics. The documentation is available for the Danish public, and is not so (indirectly) censored as is the Swedish. In Sweden, the media clavier plays a different melody. If you were to ask a Swedish journalist when ethnicity should be mentioned in press reports and police messages over wanted criminals, the answer would be “When it is relevant.” Apparently rape cases are never relevant, because the majority of perpetrators are immigrants and childeren to immigrants, and by principle it is never mentioned. Therefore publicity is of no help in solving crime as it is in this country, thus Swedish media makes itself an accomplice to crime by helping serious criminals avoid justice.

One can only guess as to why they have this cynical and hypocritical policy, yet a study from Gothenburg University in 2002 called Swedish journalists “The world’s most power loyal journalists,” and it does not seem distant to assume that Swedish journalists are keen to oblige those in power to. How? By actually hiding from Swedes what politicians via rampant immigration policies have done to the country both socio-economically and criminal-politically: They have provided Sweden with a rape rate that is worse than the U.S. and a crime total that is on the U.S. level.

But it is not only Swedish journalists who are wheedling and hypocritical. BRÅ - Crime Prevention Council (which represents our Kriminalpreventive Råd) in Sweden popularily called: Brottsförnekande Rådet or Crime Denial Council hides and retouches statistics so that it is difficult to assess an accurate picture of the social reality. In a series of articles in Aftonbladet in 2002 researchers complain that BRÅ engages in Government commissioned work. “It is a disaster everywhere at BRÅ”, said psychiatry professor Sten Levander. “The mission of BRÅ is to fabricate research so that it pleases the Minister” The in Denmark too, well known professor and novelist, Leif GW Persson who works at BRÅ, says “We don´t engage in independent research, but angle our reports to suit the government.”

It can be both surprising and then again not, that rape statistics are tampered in Sweden. If the truth came out people would be extremely upset - “PISSED OFF”. As it is now, it is “only” the victims and their families that feel the pain.

We believe that the sweep-under-carpet-strategy expresses an appalling cynicism and a despicable hypocrisy. BRÅ manages to state that just over forty percent of rapes in Sweden are committed by immigrants. When one knows the Danish rates, it seems completely absurd as Sweden has 2.8 times more immigrants per capita than Denmark. A realistic Swedish immigrant number must be between 80 and 90 percent of committed rapes, when the average figure in Denmark is around 70 percent. But BRÅ here has invented the hocus-pokus-term “foreign born”, which immediately sorts away all naturalized and their offspring and signals the official, confirmed dogma of Culture does not matter, only social conditions. Lies, Latin and manipulating statistics.

To further establish the bitter truth we point out a report that the National Democrats have recently issued. The title reads: “Immigrants, rape, and the truth - a report on abuses in the multicultural society.” Please do not react with the automatic pilot as in: Well, it is a counterpart to the Danish People’s Party, so we need not listen to what they have to say or what their arguments and documentation are. The National Democrats do the work the Swedish newspapers don´t: They go to the the courts to access information and report what the newspapers do not want to mention: Ethnicity!

Click on the link, read yourself and form your own opinion. We cannot here duplicate the report’s methods and concepts in detail, but have to be satisfied with the conclusions: That sexual abuse of girls and women committed by immigrants is a growing problem. Neither the police, schools, the media orthe authorities tell the truth because they fear what would happen if the whole truth came to light. The figures show that men with immigrant backgrounds commit more rapes than Swedes. 93 offenders have been investigated. Of them 67 had an immigrant background, ie at least one foreign born parent. It gives a2.4 times over-representation of men with an immigrant background. Furthermore rapists choose primarily Swedish girls as victims. Of the total 49 rape victims, where a man with an immigrant background was the perpetrator, 30 had a Swedish background.

Men with backgrounds in certain regions commit more rapes than others. Of the 67 offenders with immigrant backgrounds 30 can be attributed to the Middle East/North Africa region, 13 to Latin America and 7 to the rest of Africa.

This column is primarily directed at our politicians at all levels, but at the same time, we perceive it as part of alerting the Danish population of the forces we are dealing with and that the “bury our heads in the sand” policy would lead us straight into the Swedish abyss. Furthermore, we aim to both broadly capture the massive collision of cultures due to decades long influx of integration-reluctant Muslims and to gather strength against the intensive anti-democratic and manschauvinistisk campaign undertaken by forces from particular Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, that increasingly includes rape.

The situation of Swedish women should be of importence because Sweden, as The Democracy and Integration Minister Mona Sahlin correctly announced, is 40-50 years “ahead” of Denmark when it comes to multi-culture or “Diversity”, as it so fancifully is called.

Rape figures seem to closely coincide with numbers of immigrants. We note that women in the “state-feminist Sweden” are partly without legal rights, almost like hunted prey, who no longer dare move as freely as they were accustomed to. Each single day 6.8 notified rapes are perpetrated, perhaps even up to 68 (estimated number of unknown cases included).

If rape offenders are caught in Denmark, they can look forward to a prison sentence of about three years. Swedish offenders statistically go almost completely free. Can we as a society tolerate that it is so cheap to destroy a young woman’s life? Perhaps her whole lifetime? The answer is a resolute no.

Therefore, the penalty should be increased to at least double. Furthermore, if one at all is to expect a preventive effect to prevent further tragedies, the repatriation of the worst rapists should be a self-evident course. This appears unfortunately to be one of the only measures certain callous rapists have respect for. “attendance “ -treatment - should of course be for no other than the victim. Sweden should for their women’s sake, take after Denmark, and we under no circumstances should go in Swedens footsteps.

Do the politicians and the public authorities know their “VISITING HOURS”? Or is the next step to take the law into their own hands, which people resort to when the system fails the ordinary citizen?
http://66.102.1.102/translate_c?hl=sv&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http://balder.org/articles/sverige/Voldtakt-Muslim-Invandrar-Sverige.php&prev=_t&usg=ALkJrhi03sKELHrnlufQ3angWymL4Z-fjg

...................................................................................................................................................................................To be Continued

Posted by Freethinker2308 on February 04, 2009, 02:34 AM | #

Posted by Emma K. on January 30, 2009, 01:03 AM | #

You’ll have to forgive me if I’m wrong, but this screams propaganda to me, whether it’s completely made up or exaggerated to create an impression.  The whole “the bad people who don’t look like us must be locked up because they’re raping our women” is a classic story that’s been tried in a variety of places, not to mention slavery-era United States.  This is not to say that particular incidents do not happen, but do we really have a trend here? I suspect it’s not. 
---
Emma K.
San Diego personal injury lawyer

2/2

Since 1998, SÄPO (Swedish Security Police) extended the definition of crime with racist and xenophobic elements to cover not only the majority population, but minorities as well as criminal offenses against the majority population. Phenomena of racism and xenophobia is not limited to the majority against minorities.

The attitudes of immigrant men towards Swedish girls versus girls from the own ethnic group, a study by the Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter

We get a perception of women related to ethnicity by members of immigrant gangs as a couple of young man from Lebanon give their barefaced view on the Rissne gang rape case to a Swedish newspaper(DN 000211): “It is not as wrong to rape a Swedish girl as an Arab girl. The Swedish girl may of course need lots of help afterwards, and she has probably already screwed. But the Arab girl will have problems with her family. For her, it is a great shame to be raped. It is important that she is a virgin when she marries.” Another replied: “I will never do it, I promise, but if I were to rape a girl, I would choose a Swedish girl, a short skirt and high heels. Swedish girls must learn to protect themselves. They must understand how immigrant guys function. How we for instance view Swedish girls.” Leila from Iran, Swedish Malin and Jessica and Nancy with Syrian backgrounds gave their views on the issue in the study (DN 000218): “All girls who have been raped have a equally tough and troublesome plight!” The four observe in everydeay life attitudes where immigrants class Swedes as inferior beings. “Fucking Svenne, as they say,” says Jessica. The equivalent corresponds well with Blatte (Wog) and it is the Swedish girls who suffer most. For they are also whores. Svenne whores.” In the immigrant suburbs “There are many boygangs that actually despise Swedish girls.” They nevertheless refrain from stigmatizing all guys from the Middle East, because they know many who are ok.

From a report crime linked to the country´s internal security in 1999 (SÄPO 2000:22):

“During the year, remarkably many muggings. Overall statistics include 22 robberies, two of which were judged to have clear elements of racism and xenophobia, while 20 crimes are more doubtful. Among the doubtful cases are a series muggings carried out in the center of town in April and May 1998. The approach was the same as with the 16 robberies reported in Gothenburg. A bunch of young people of foreign origin attacked exclusively young Swedish men, and robbed or tried to rob them of cell phones and cash. In Stockholm two muggings with similar backgrounds were notified, where the perpetrators also expressed that the victims were ‘Svennedjävlar (Swedish Bastards)’,asked questions like ‘are you racists’ and ‘do you have anything against the Kurds’ and stated ‘I do not rob svartskallar (wogs)’ The statements together with the approache, especially the fact that all the victims were Swedish men, suggests that there is some element of racism/xenophobia in the muggings. The motives for the crimes were probably a combination of the perpetrators need for money/cell phones and a form of power demonstration. The choice of victims, however, indicates a certain disrespect towards Swedes.”

Aje Carlbom, a social anthropologist from Lund and author of a dissertation on Rosengard in Malmo:

“They move here and become part of a local public instead.” Carlbom sees Rosengard more as an Islamic society than a Swedish. People can live there entirely by using their own language, without learning Swedish and without contact with the Swedish society.
http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=_t&hl=sv&ie=UTF-8&u=http://www.resonproduktion.com/personran2.html&sl=sv&tl=en&history;_state0=&swap=1

“The difference between Sweden and Turkey is that in Turkey you must pay for the Whores but not here. “
17-year old Turkish boy tells about their attitude towards Swedes.” Source: The sole’s labyrinth”, Mauricio Rojas, member of Parliament (fp)

“The only thing that happens when you rape a Swedish whore is that you get to talk to a woman from the social services “ “It is not as wrong to rape a Swedish girl as an Arabic” “I do not have much respect for Swedish girls. You can say that they are fucked to pieces.”
(Interview immigrant boy in the Dagens Nyheter 11/02 -00)

Posted by Freethinker2308 on February 04, 2009, 02:45 AM | #

Posted by Lurker on January 30, 2009, 04:38 PM | #

Freethinker - you have to ask just how these muslims got to live amongst us in the first place.

It didnt just happen on its own.

That one is easy. It can only be contributed to the ethnic-suicidal policies of the Swedish left that has been in power for 65 of the last 74 years.

Posted by Captainchaos on February 04, 2009, 11:48 AM | #

The first, visceral reaction of many is that these rapists should be hauled into a room without windows by burly Norsemen; and what is left of them, afterwards, could be removed in a bucket.  But that kind of reaction tends to stew in its own juices, and remains impotent as such - in the present context.  It is not the kind of motivation that gets people to work as activists for their nationalist party. 

The light at the end of the tunnel that all nationalist parties need to offer is maximum repatriation; unflinchingly.

Posted by Freethinker2308 on February 05, 2009, 02:12 AM | #

MORE ON HOW MAINSTREAM MEDIA KEEPS REPORTING THE MUSLIM RAPE WAVE AFFLICTING SWEDEN! IT IS A DISGUSTING CONCEALMENT OF THE TRUTH!

Tre convicted of rape
One of the two girls raped by three men in an apartment in Gothenburg was only thirteen but the men were not convicted for raping a minor as the men had reason to believe she was older than fifteen. On Tuesday the men were convicted of rape but not for raping a minor writes Göterborgsposten on the web. The girls, 13 and 15 years old had been visiting Gothenburg last year during their winter vacation but somehow missed their last train home. At a hamburger restaurant they met two of the men who offered them a place for the night at a friends apartment. There the girls were served vodka and became very intoxicated. The men then engaged several times in sexual-intercourse with the girls. The prosecuter found the offences severe, and in one case against a minor but the District Court of Gothenburg only convicted the men on normal charges of rape. A 23 year old man was was sentenced to 3,5 years, while the 21 year old whose apartment it was, received a two year sentence. A 17 year old received probation. The three are to jointly pay damages of 130 000 kronor to each of the girls.
http://www.svd.se/nyheter/inrikes/artikel_2418109.svd

AND THESE ARE THE FACTS!


SOMALI TRIO CONVICTED OF RAPING TWO YOUNG TEENAGE GIRLS IN GOTHENBURG

February 3, 2009 Gothenburg District Court, Case file nr B 2629-08

On January 16, 2009 three young Somali men are charged for the rape of two girls, 13 and 15 years old in Gothenburg last year.

The three accused:
Omer Ahmed Sheekh, born 1984-12-15, registered as a residence of Norway, citizen of Somalia.
Mohamed Musse, born 1986-10-21, registered as a residence of Gothenburg, citizen of Somalia.
Mohammed Mahamud, born 1990-06-12, registered as a residence of Angered.

Background:
The three young man met the girls in Gothenburg in February last year. They lured the girls to an apartment in Guldheden where one of the offenders lived. The girls were then pressured into consuming alcohol and when they become so intoxicated that they could no longer resist, they were raped repeatedly by all three of the men. It became clear that one of the girls had contracted VD from the abuse. Apart from that the girls had no physical injuries, however, the psychological damage is a fact which requires prolonged treatment. 

The grounds for the verdict:
Gothenburg District Court rules today, on the February 3, 2009, that Omer Ahmed Sheekh be sentenced to prison for 3.5 years for rape.

Mohamed Musse is to be sentenced to 2 years in prison for rape.

Mohammed Mahamud convicted of rape, the penalty PROBATION with special regulations: Mohammed Mahamud is to participate in specific activities related to current crime problems. Mohammed Mahamud has undergone a medical investigation and the investigating physician´s assessment is that a serious mental disorder is likely to have occured at the time of the offense and that due grounds exist for prison prohibition under the previous version of Chapter 30 Section 6 BRB. The District Court did not find reason to order such an investigation. Social Services in Gunnared have in previous crime investigations (robbery) found evidence that Mohammed Mahamuds mental performance is well below that of young people of similar age, the results coincide with those of children with special needs. The educational assessment from school defines his skills comparable to that of grade five students. He has concentration problems and a weak understanding of consequence. Mohammed Mahamud has already been sentenced as a 15-year-old for several robberies. 

Penalty value:
The district court reasons that the Penalty value for an adult is three years. With reduction due to his age, this would correspond to a year in prison. Further reduction should, however, with regard to Mahamuds mental disability in accordance to Chapter 29 Section 3 BRB. With a reduced penalty value of 10 months there is a prerequisite for selecting another form of penalty than imprisonment. The District Court found that PROBATION with proposed regulations is for Mahamud the most appropriate penalty.

Sheekh Omer and Mohamed Musse shall remain in custody until the ruling becomes final. The District Courts Decision on January 29, 2009 is to release Mohammed Mahamud.

Damages to the victims:
The trio are jointly to pay 130 000 SEK in damages to each victim. 

Background - detailed description:
The girls who are residents outside of Gothenburg missed for some reason their last train home, so they went to a McDonalds in Nordstan where they met Mohammed Mahamud and Sheekh Omer. They offered the girls to hang out at a friends (Mohamed Musse) apartment and to sleep there. Mohammed Mahamud said that they had alcohol at the apartment. The girls were offered alcohol by the men and were pressured to drink more and more. The girls were not physically forced to drink but have described that they felt pressured and dared not to resist when the boys were been unreasonable and raised their voices, and they were afraid to make the boys angry. Both girls became so intoxicated before any sexual activity occurred that they felt dizzy and were unable to walk properly. They have repeatedly vomited, sometimes in direct connection to sexual activity. It is in light of all of this information indisputable that when girl B had settled on the bed she quite immediately lost consciousness and was completely unaware of the events that followed and she even had to be woken up to leave the apartment. It is quite clear that she was in a completely helpless state when the boys took advantage of her. Girl A had before any sexual activity occured, settled down on a mattress on the floor to rest. She has described that she felt nauseous, that she was wobbly and dizzy, and that she had no strength in her arms and legs and was thus unable to physically resist or defend herself, and that she occasionally was in an unconscious state and at times in a conscious. The District Court finds that the objective of the boys was to get the girls intoxicated and then have sex with them, and this according to Mohamed Musse, was the goal of Omer Sheekh. 

How the defendants plead:
Sheekh Omer denies responsibility for the crimes. He totally denies the charges against him and claims that he had not been present in the apartment.

Mohammed Mahamud denies responsibility for the crimes. He has admitted that he had oral sex with girl A, but argues that this was voluntary. He denies the charges that he took advantage of her helpless state.

Mohamed Musse denies responsibility for the crimes. He admits that he was present in the apartment when the alleged crimes took place but denies the charges against him.

DNA evidence:
There is DNA evidence from two people in one of the girls panties. Through the evidene revealed the District Court finds that Omer Shreekh had vaginal intercourse twice with girl A. Oral sex took place between girl B with and the two other men.

The verdict of The District Court:
In accordance to the legislative amendment of 2005 where the extension was made to include even sexual abuse where the perpetrator takes advantage of a victim due to intoxication or a similar helpless state even where the ability to defend oneself is not completely eliminated. Parts of what previously was classed as sexual exploitation in Chapter 6, Section 3 BRB is to be classed as rape. 
According the District Court Eeven girl A has been in the helpless state referred to in Chapter 6, Section 1.
The District Court therefore concludes that the sexual acts that occurred constitute what is classed as rape.

Appeals:
If either part is unsatisfied with the ruling, appeals are to be made so that The District Court receives them at latest on February 24, 2009. The appeal must be made to the Court of Appeals for Western Sweden.

The States expences:
Expences for three public defenders, and one legal representative of the plaintiffs (joint representation) amount to 213 721 kr.

Links:
Gothenburg District Court, Case file nr B 2629-08
Göteborgsposten 2009-02-03, Three sentenced for rape

Furthermore to be reported is that the prosecutor did not in any of the cases invoke expulsion from the country.

http://politisktinkorrekt.wordpress.com/2009/02/03/somalisk-trio-falldes-for-valdtakt-pa-tva-unga-tonarsflickor-i-goteborg/

Posted by SDVisitor on February 23, 2009, 01:06 AM | #

Totally unpleasant picture. I hope you could add a warning or something in your title. Don’t raise hatred. Peace.

Posted by FTV on March 03, 2009, 11:48 AM | #

I see.... Call the vikings.

Posted by Alyssa Uk on March 11, 2009, 01:50 PM | #

no comment.

Posted by UK on March 22, 2009, 02:35 PM | #

I am muslim and would like to act I condemn this act and would condemn it no matter which woman it was done to. The point is not the ethnicity of the woman nor the label of the culprits at hand, the point is the act, the act is wrong and justice should be served. I am aware the culprits were muslim but just because the LABEL is muslim it gives no one the authority to condemn a whole community/group of people because of the actions of someone else, it defies logic. I and other muslims are NOT the one who commited this act and will not take responsibility for the actions of someone else, the ones who commited this act know who they are and they are the ones who should be bought to justice, and focus on anything else with respect to this act is anything but justice.

Europeans will NEVER need muslims/Islam for the decendance and decline of western Europe. You are doing a good job of it yourself. You keep making references all the time to your land. What is this?  You have no MORAL CLAIM to the land. If it is your land (lol) then why so TERRIFIED of such a immoral/unjust religion? If you are not terrified why so terrified? Accept it or not islam is here, it is here, Islam has finally come the west. The sooner you accept it the better and leave us, yes us people in peace. Islam this Islam that it is about time you westerners understand and acccept that ME, WE AND MY RELIGION (ISLAM) IS NOT THE ANTIDOTE FOR THE ILLS OF YOUR (WESTERN) SOCIETY. You better start addressing your problems soon and whilst your at it make sure you dont STEAL our values to do it, Yes OUR VALUES.

All talk and no action is all you westerners are when it comes to islam, you people have lost the sooner you accept it the better not for me or anyone else but for yourself. You hate us, you dont want us here, the feelings mutual but its not about what me and you want, its about everyone, who cares what me and you want??? Yes I agree muslims can’t live admist non muslims LIKE YOU, so you know where the door is.

Although not relvent to this thread the past posts talking about beauty the issue of a muslim with a non-muslim european man would not even arise. The south asian muslims dating the european men which to my knowledge is very few are only taking them for a ride, the white man has always been open to being taken for a ride.

Posted by UK on March 25, 2009, 04:16 PM | #

Posted by J Richards on April 17, 2006, 07:10 PM | #

“To the Muslims who have posted here,

Islam allows Muslims men to rape women that their right hand possesses (slaves) and thereby justifies the rape of non-Muslim women in many scenarios.  Prophet Mohammed had a huge number of wives and concubines, and the holy Prophet Mohammed had sex with a pre-pubescent girl.  Does this not meet the definition of a sexual pervert? “

You need to stop these Bad Jokes. If your fondness is too great-Take a look in the mirror you’ll see the Biggest joke.

Posted by Darknight on March 25, 2009, 04:38 PM | #

Posted by J Richards on April 17, 2006, 07:10 PM | #

To the Muslims who have posted here,

Islam allows Muslims men to rape women that their right hand possesses (slaves) and thereby justifies the rape of non-Muslim women in many scenarios.  Prophet Mohammed had a huge number of wives and concubines, and the holy Prophet Mohammed had sex with a pre-pubescent girl.  Does this not meet the definition of a sexual pervert?

You need to stop these Bad Jokes but if your fondness is too great- Take a look in the mirror you’ll see the Biggest Joke!

Posted by SM on March 25, 2009, 07:52 PM | #

>Does this not meet the definition of a sexual pervert?

You think that the religious wackdoodles are more “perverted” than the mainstream West?

("Pervert" of course is a relative construct.)

Marrying “underage” female relatives (eg niece, cousin) in polygyny groupings was normal up until two generations ago. It is down right healthy and sane compared to the West.

I think a better definition of pervert would be the lifestyles in the modern West. Lifestyles which are the side effect of…

The dallance of females picking and choosing with vapid aplumb (while at the same time being able to hide inside a male-libido induced fairy story called ‘the fairer sex’), allowing rampant divorce (with a ‘no fault’ presumption of guilt of the males), patho raising of children (note _way more patho psychos in the west than any other culture by far_]. “Et cetera, et cetera et cetera”.

In general the marginaliztion of the adult males as authority (scant authority they had in the previous centuries) is the root of “perversion” [what I call ‘cosmopolitan psychological-septic illness’].

Meanwhile the manifestations of male authority (deemed perversions) will lead to females being boinked, enharemed and disciplined when they display. If one can not handle that, there is always self emasculation and _not procreating daughters_; then you won’t have to be soiled with the notion that a ‘perverted’ male (ie normal adult male) somewhere is enjoying a female (eg an inherent stunted victim) related to you.

The whites have simply embraced and now rally around --in standard knuckledhead conformist ways--an unintended disaster(the modern feminised West) that was imposed through political fiat (and that imposition itself was the side effect of a previous disaster called democracy, called the magna charter, called christianity, called Rome, called civilization itself unfortunately, etc etc.)

===========
The actual story itself (which I haven’t read) is tabloid (published by jew liberals I’d wager), meant to sell advertising (and “dark political objective") to the masses.

Posted by SM on March 25, 2009, 07:55 PM | #

>Does this not meet the definition of a sexual pervert?

You think that the religious wackdoodles are more “perverted” than the mainstream West?

("Pervert" of course is a relative construct.)

Marrying “underage” female relatives (eg niece, cousin) in polygyny groupings was normal up until two generations ago. It is down right healthy and sane compared to the West.

I think a better definition of pervert would be the lifestyles in the modern West. Lifestyles which are the side effect of…

The dallance of females picking and choosing with vapid aplumb (while at the same time being able to hide inside a male-libido induced fairy story called ‘the fairer sex’), allowing rampant divorce (with a ‘no fault’ presumption of guilt of the males), patho raising of children (note _way more patho psychos in the west than any other culture by far_]. “Et cetera, et cetera et cetera”.

In general the marginaliztion of the adult males as authority (scant authority they had in the previous centuries) is the root of “perversion” [what I call ‘cosmopolitan psychological-septic illness’].

Meanwhile the manifestations of male authority will lead to females being boinked, enharemed and disciplined when they display. If one can not handle that, there is always self emasculation and _not procreating daughters_; then you won’t have to be soiled with the notion that a ‘perverted’ male (ie normal adult male) somewhere is enjoying a female (eg an inherent stunted victim) related to you.

The whites have simply embraced and now rally around --in standard knuckledhead conformist ways--an unintended disaster(the modern feminised West) that was imposed through political fiat (and that imposition itself was the side effect of a previous disaster called democracy, called the magna charter, called christianity, called Rome, called civilization itself unfortunately, etc etc.)

===========
The actual story itself (which I haven’t read) is tabloid (published by jew liberals I’d wager), meant to sell advertising (and “dark political objective") to the masses.

Posted by salman khan on March 26, 2009, 09:12 PM | #

to steve edawards…
wel u can get te prROOF IN BIBLE\ IT OIT..AND KINDLY RE FRESH UR INFORMATION ABT GOD EXSTANCE

Posted by symphony on March 28, 2009, 01:13 PM | #

Posted by Guessedworker on April 18, 2006, 08:50 PM | #

If morality is such a big deal in Islamoland what do these guys want with 72 virgins in paradise?

If Immorality is such a big deal in Westoland what do you Jokers want to stick your Ass up Islam 24-7?

Good question!

Posted by turkish girl on March 31, 2009, 11:10 PM | #

I just want to say to the arabics, pakistanis just leave the Turkish people alone! We’re not like them and we’ll never be!! Turks are not illiterate like them and definitely not pervert like them. I have to hide my nationality just because of those little idiots, you know what, it’s not only to the Swedish girls when they learn I’m turkish and living with my boyfriend they act like I’m a whore. They start talking each other, giving me weird look as soon as they figure it out.

Yes they are pervert because their only source to learn the sexual relation is porn or etc. They are filthy people, disgrace of humanity and even of islam.

Also, please make the distinction between Kurds and Turks. Kurdish people might leave in Turkey but it doesn’t mean that they are native born Turks, just like your raper immigrant they are ours raper immigrants. They love to be proud of their nationality unless they aren’t in trouble with law or police, when they are, they suddenly become Turkish.

Turkish people are well educated, sophisticated. Please I’m begging you do not compare us with those filthy animals!!!!!

Posted by Muhyeuddin on April 17, 2009, 01:34 PM | #

Islam shows absolutely no tolerance towards rape and considers it a disgusting crime. In Islam, rapists get capital punishment whether the rapist or the victim is Muslim or otherwise. It is dishonest to take what some idiotic, hormone-crazy, immigrants say about women and portray it as “the Muslim perspective”. One could talk to Swedish or Norwegian or Danish 16-year olds on the street and you wouldn’t get anything different from them. Peri-pubertal males are, by their very nature, hormonally driven. Its not “Islam” speaking when the teenage immigrant tells you that he wants to get in bed with a blond girl, ITS TESTOSTERONE!!! If you really want to tell the world what Islam thinks of women then why don’t you interview the traditional Islamic scholars. I know out of personal experience that there are many in Stockholm. I am a practicing Muslim and I can tell you for a fact that I was raised to respect women. I live in muslim majority country where rape is detested as much as it is detested in the West, if not more.

If you want to know about the respect for women in Islam, I am posting a few links for your convenience. Those who have studied Islam without any pre-conceived notions or prejudices have acknowledged its moral soundness.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an article published in UK’s The Guardian:
Can Islam liberate womem?
Muslim women and scholars think it does - spiritually and sexually. By Madeleine Bunting

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4314573,00.html

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Women in Islam - an article by Islamic scholar Dr. Jamal Badawi

http://www.islamfortoday.com/womensrightsbadawi.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shattering Illusions - Western Conceptions of Muslim Women
by Saimah Ashraf, a 1997-98 winner of the Stanford University Boothe Prize for Excellence in Writing.

http://www.islamfortoday.com/shatteringillusions.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Former Sudanese Speaker for Parliament and Deputy Prime Minister, Dr. Hasan Turabi writes “On the Position of Women in Islam and in Islamic Society”
By Dr. Hassan al-Turabi.

http://www.islamfortoday.com/turabi01.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Islam - Elevation of Women’s Status
Transcript of a public lecture by Sheikh Ali Al-Timimi to a mixed Muslim and non-Muslim audience at McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

http://www.islamfortoday.com/womensstatus.htm

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article originally appearing in ASIAWEEK, written by former Prime Minister of Pakistan, Mrs. Benazir Bhutto.
on: WOMEN IN ISLAM.

http://www.islamfortoday.com/benazir.htm

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Have a nice day!

Posted by Lan on April 20, 2009, 11:45 AM | #

Hi. In the future I’m going to keep here links to their sites. Such as this - can synthroid cause seizures. But I do not worry about the sites where my link is removed. So if you do not want to see a mountain of links, simply delete this message. After 2 weeks, I will come back and check.

Posted by Alan on April 20, 2009, 07:09 PM | #

Hi all. The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they’re going to have some pretty annoying virtues.
I am from Yemen and , too, and now am writing in English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: “Search multiple travel sites, compare airline prices, search our travel deals, and receive free fare predictions.”

With love 8-), Alan.

Posted by Azam Saeed on April 22, 2009, 01:32 PM | #

This is shamefull act to all of you(so called civilization nations) that you are lieing about muslims.
No body can prove that Islam allowed muslim to rap with non-muslim girl.
Islam never allowed rap even adultery(with both muslim and non-muslim girl)
Allah order muslims to avoid see the girls(else of wife and other close relations ships).
Muhammad(PBHM) said that every eye do also sex and eye sex is see other girls.
and he will answer about this act.
So please study islam and then talk about muslim and Muhammad(PBUH)
Islam do not distingiush between muslim and non-muslim on the matter of rap or adultery.

Posted by I think rape is extremly wrong ! o\../o on April 29, 2009, 12:47 AM | #

http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/ http://www.runescape.com/

Posted by Max on May 05, 2009, 05:34 PM | #

I think the biggest issue in this discussion is the intolerance you are all preaching at each other. Nobody is listening to each other, everyone has spewed their biased, ignorant, unoriginal opinions and refused to listen to anyone else. This is not a discussion of the degenerative effects of the Muslim population on Western culture, this is an opportunity for the so-called democrats to rant about one more marginalized minority that is single-handedly turning all of western civilization into a maelstrom of rape and violent crimes, and a place for offended and defensive Muslims to to angrily retort and rant about their own skewed perceptions of Western civilization.

Please understand:
NOT ALL Muslims are rapists and killers
NOT ALL Westerners are racist right-wing conservatives who generalize an entire race into a criminal category
SOME Westerners rape and beat women too
SOME Muslims believe in woman’s rights
If you keep calling each other names nothing will be resolved. Why should anyone respect your opinion or take what you have to say seriously if you’re using racial slurs and calling names?
Multiculturalism is a fact. There is no turning back, you can’t separate one race from another, you can’t kick groups of people out of your country, you can’t close the borders to only Muslims or only Jews, you can’t protect your society from the influx of people who think differently than you. Variety is inevitable at this point. There is only one way a multicultural society can survive without hate crimes and racial tension: you have to STOP SPREADING PROPAGANDA, you have to STOP JUDGING, and most importantly you have to AGREE ON A CODE OF SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE CONDUCT.

Let’s consider the root of the problem in this article : The rising rate of rape in Sweden is apparently due to the influx of Muslim immigrants.
Assuming this is accurate, the problem will not be solved by writing articles like this, by sending letters to government officials or by touting prejudices in conversations online. If anything, a more straightforward, adult and moderated communication is necessary to break down language, cultural and religious barriers and misconceptions. Throughout this forum Europeans and Americans have been criticizing the practices of Muslims, and Muslims have been responding with their own criticism of Western culture. It’s true, they are different, however, living together peacefully is not an unattainable goal if you can discuss and accept controversial aspects of each others culture respectfully and maturely.
I’m not asking Muslim women to take of their scarves, or western women to wear them. I’m asking western men to respect the Muslim woman’s choice in wearing a scarf and Muslim men to accept that in the western culture not wearing a headscarf is not considered inappropriate. I’m asking you not to judge.
The only other way we can survive together is to respect each others rules and customs. It is against the law to rape women both in Muslim and Euro-American cultures. Some Muslims rape American women, some American men rape Muslims. We are not all responsible for the criminal population of our country, so we have to stop calling each other names.

Posted by Darren on May 05, 2009, 05:54 PM | #

Max,

History is full of examples where one ethnic group drove another ethnic group out of its lands. Kevin MacDonald briefly discusses post-WWII ethnonationalism and why people fight for their kin: http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/080327_muller.htm

Also think of many of the nations we know of today and how they came about and what they once were. You cannot so quickly throw away history. (Multiculturalism, by the way, is not a “fact”; it is neither true or false).

Why do you think some sort gentlemanly negotiation will alleviate the crime waves that are associated with non-western immigrants? We already have a “code of conduct”: its called OUR LAWS THAT THEY DO NOT RESPECT!

Its amazing how liberals believe that human nature can be so easily overturned and suppressed. Either the Europeans will fight back against the non-westerners which are in the process of replacing them, or the non-westerners will replace them and make Europe in the image of their culture and society. They are most certainly not going to embrace and extend liberalism after they have replaced the Europeans.

Posted by danielj on May 05, 2009, 06:11 PM | #

I’m asking western men to respect the Muslim woman’s choice in wearing a scarf and Muslim men to accept that in the western culture not wearing a headscarf is not considered inappropriate.

I’m sure they will find an arrangement where you continue to ask them politely to stop while they continue to rape with impunity completely agreeable.

Posted by Alain on May 09, 2009, 07:59 PM | #

so… 2 swedish, 1 finn and 1 somali… but before arriving to this web i only read: a somalian gang… so tell me, is this a somalian gang? was this rape true? it seems not.

Posted by SM on May 10, 2009, 12:29 AM | #

Either the Europeans will fight back against the non-westerners which are in the process of replacing them, or the non-westerners will replace them and make Europe in the image of their culture and society.

How will Europeans fight back IF they have embraced Liberalism? ...Catch 22

(Remember a (conservative) male of a culture is a selectively bred conformist to the ways of his group. So the western conservative male is simply the warrior drone of liberalism. ...Catch 22)

-------
And BTW, what’s wrong with controlling the females?

Posted by Captainchaos on May 10, 2009, 12:53 AM | #

And BTW, what’s wrong with controlling the females?

Goddamnit Shit Monger, looks like Massa hasn’t learned you yet, boy.  LOL!

Posted by UK on May 10, 2009, 08:59 AM | #

Posted by SM on May 10, 2009, 12:29 AM | #

Either the Europeans will fight back against the non-westerners which are in the process of replacing them, or the non-westerners will replace them and make Europe in the image of their culture and society.

How will Europeans fight back IF they have embraced Liberalism? ...Catch 22

(Remember a (conservative) male of a culture is a selectively bred conformist to the ways of his group. So the western conservative male is simply the warrior drone of liberalism. ...Catch 22)

Exactly! No doubt it will end in tears for the so called west,no doubt its coming but the cat is not quiet out the bag yet.....

Posted by UK on May 10, 2009, 09:25 AM | #

Posted by SM on May 10, 2009, 12:29 AM | #
-------
And BTW, what’s wrong with controlling the females?

There are many ways to control people some more clever and hidden than others (things can be deceptive) and in many ways every way is a form of control so you end up a slave either way, so whats to decide what way/form of control is better.

As regards muslim woman any self respecting muslim woman would rather be a slave to islam than a slave to the west.

Posted by battle on May 10, 2009, 10:43 AM | #

Posted by Phil Peterson on April 17, 2006, 08:02 AM | #

“David Duke is a racialist. Islam is not a racialist religion. Your “hope” that he will convert to Islam is as wishful as the hope for those virgins waiting in heaven for the true believer.”

ISLAM IS NOT “RACIALIST”???

“To be a Muslim you have to destroy your history, to stamp on your ancestral culture. The sands of Arabia is all that matters. This abolition of the self is worse than the colonial abolition, much worse.” --- VS Naipaul (Nobel Prize, Literature, 2001)

--------------------------------------

Arabs in Persian literature:

Iranianness has an important theme in modern Persian literature from its very beginnings. As part of the answer to the question of self-definition, some Persian Iranian writers, like Mohammad Ali Jamalzadeh, Sadeq Chubak, Mehdi Akhavan Sales, and Nader Naderpour, have used images of Arabs to define Iran as a nation and themselves as Iranian in contrast to an Arab Other.

The Arab Other is a reverse definition of the Iranian Self, for some in terms of race or language, for others in terms of religion, history and culture as well. Moreover, the Arab Other is a metaphor which may also represent the Islamic, or Western Other, or certain aspects of Iranian life which the writer would not be able to criticize openly, for example, the monarchy.

However, defining Iranianness is not only a literary concern, but is essential to the creation of an “Iranian” national identity in the 20th century. Indeed, the development of Iranian nationalism in the 19th and 20th centuries, in literary and political discourse, may be seen as the “ideological creation of the nation” suggested by Benedict Anderson.

According to Anderson, one cannot “define” a nation by a set of external and abstract criteria, or objective social facts. Instead the nation is “an imagined political community,” something which is “thought out,” “created.” Thus, literary works are both a reflection of and, more importantly, a part of an ideological discourse, part of the creation of modern Iranian nationalism and Iran as a modern nation.

Iranian nationalist discourse set for itself the task of defining Iran as a nation and formulating an Iranian nationalism. One way to define the Iranian Self is by defining the Other—Western, Islamic, Arab—in terms of language, race, history, culture, religion or ideology. Thus, Shahrokh Meskoob sets the Iranian Self against the Arab Other, defining Iranianness in terms of Persian language and pre-Islamic history. Manoochehr Dorraj, sees Shi’i Islam, as an essential part of Iranianness, and sets the Iranian Self against the Western (non-Islamic) Other. The terms of these definitions, however, are set by two very different understandings of nationalism.

Leon Poliakov describes the Western paradigm of nationalism, based on myths of a common origin, the linguistic evidence of which became proof of race, and of a Golden Age, to which the nation might return by returning to its original cultural, linguistic and racial purity (all terms being interchangeable).

Indeed, Western nationalist and racist ideas, particularly the existence of an “Aryan” and “Semitic” race, developed hand-in-hand. Indeed, the central motif of racism is “purity,” the same purity which informs the Western national model and so precludes a multi-ethnic nationalism. Meskoob defines Iranianness in terms of this Western nationalist discourse. It is the same understanding of nationalism which was largely propaganda by the Pahlavi government.

However, Dorraj defines Iranianness in terms of the “alternative Islamic ideology” which emerged in the 1960s and 1970s in Iran. In what one might call an Islamist rather than a nationalist view, the Other is seen in ideological terms, and it is this view which is reflected in the Islamic Republic.

The same definitions of Iranianness, in terms of the Iranian Self and the Arab or Western Other, and the same formulations of Iranian nationalism appear in literary discourse.

(Back to topics)

In Mohammad Ali Jamalzadeh’s “Persian is [as Sweet as] Sugar,” Persian and Iranian are synonymous, as are Arab (or French or Azarbaijani) and foreign. While Jamalzadeh regards Islam as integral to an Iranian national identity, he objects to a backward Islam, and to Arabness as foreign. Jamalzadeh associates an Arab Other with religious superstition and backwardness, and defines the Iranian Self as Persian and Muslim. Yet, while Jamalzadeh uses the Western national model, seeing Iranian nationalism in terms of a common language and identity, he does not support Western racism.

Sadeq Hedayat loathes the Arab Other, and abhors Islam as an Arab religion. In “Seeking Absolution” and Parvin the Sasanid Girl, he portrays Arabs as dark-skinned, dirty, diseased, ugly, stupid, cruel and shameless, bestial and demonic. Moreover, Hedayat portrays present-day Iranian Muslims as corrupt and hypocritical. Only his Sasanid Iranians are attractive, courageous, intelligent, cultured and virtuous.

Hedayat idealizes the pre-Islamic, Zoroastrian past as the Golden Age of Iran. In his view, Iran’s true cultural identity, shared with “Aryan” India, was destroyed by the Arab Muslim invaders, who replaced Iran’s superior civilization with the brutal and bloodthirsty culture and religion of their own. Hedayat, often admired as a writer of sensitivity and progressive human values, espouses Western racism and anti-Semitism. He believes that “Aryan” Iranians are racially superior to the “Semitic” Arabs.

Sadeq Chubak’s view differs only somewhat from that of Hedayat. In The Patient Stone, Iranian rootlessness and alienation are the result of history: the Arab Muslims destroyed a great Iranian civilization and could not replace it. Iranians, both individually and socially, have consequently suffered because they were cut off from their own, true Iranian history, art, and culture.

Chubak’s characters also reveal racist thinking, and a level of anti-Arab sentiment throughout The Patient Stone. Chubak portrays the Arab (and Indian) Other as hypocritical, ugly and cruel, while the Iranian Self has been defeated and further corrupted by Semitic hypocrisy in the form of Islam, for Chubak sees the institution of Shi’i Islam in Iran only as a tool for oppression.

At the same time, he rejects Iranian chauvinism. Zoroastrianism and the history of Iranian kings hold no answers either. Indeed, Chubak goes so far as to equate Zoroastrianism with Islam, and to reject both. However, he rejects Islam on two levels: because it is a religion, which in Chubak’s view offers no answers, and because it is an Arab religion. For Chubak, there are no answers; life is indeed without meaning. However, alienation and existential despair are both universal, and historically and culturally specific. Existential despair informs the Self more than categories of Iranianness or Arabness, yet Chubak maintains those categories as well. While Chubak rejects Aryanism, his writings do support anti-Semitism.

Mehdi Akhavan Sales, like Hedayat, blames the Muslim Arab invaders for destroying Iran’s true cultural identity and longs for a return to pre-Islamic Zoroastrian culture and greatness. According to “The Ending of the Shahnameh,” the ending of Zoroastrian Iranian cultures with the defeat of the Sasanid empire and the coming of Islam has resulted in ruin and despair, which can be resolved only by returning to Iran’s pre-Islamic golden age. The Iranian Self was pure, bright and beautiful, but has been corrupted by the Arab Other, false, dark, and evil.

Akhavan decries “Semitic and Arabic and Islamic” influence on the “heritage of our own Aryan ancestors.” In so doing he echoes Hedayat’s view of Iranians and Arabs as two different and unequal races, one Aryan and superior, the other Semitic and inferior.

Nader Naderpour rejects Arabs and Islam as alien, and fundamentally opposed to the true Iranian culture and values. “Here and There” repeats the same image of Arabs as found in Hedayat and Akhavan, as savage, alien intruders who have destroyed a superior Iranian civilization. Nader Naderpour portrays the Arab Other as dark, savage and inhuman, in images of the irrational, blood and the moon; he portrays the Iranian Self as the creator of an enlightened civilization in images of Zoroastrian fire, the sun and springtime.

Naderpour sees Islam not so much as wrong in itself, but wrong because it is Arab, and therefore backward and cruel. In “Here and There,” Naderpour compares the establishment of the Islamic Republic to the Arab Muslim conquest of the Sasanid empire, and suggests that it is in fact a continuation of that same defeat of superior Iranian culture at the hands of the ignorant and intolerant Arabs. In Naderpour’s view, to be a devout Muslim, or a supporter of the Islamic Republic of Iran, is to be Arab and therefore not Iranian, indeed therefore almost less than human. Like Hedayat, Chubak and Akhavan, his is an anti-Islamic and anti-Arab view.

http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/Sept97/IranArab/index.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by battle on May 10, 2009, 10:47 AM | #

Mazyar: a historic drama
Sadeq Hedayat and racial supremacy
Majid Nafisi

http://www.iran-bulletin.org/IBMEF_1_word 6 files/mazyar.doc

Is small moustache writer Sadeq Hedayat’s [1] carries under his nose in some photographs decorative or ideological? Look at any photo album of the era of Reza Shah (1926 - 1941) and you will see many men sporting such a moustache, and analogous to the broad moustache of left or the unshaven look of the Islamists, illustrate their ideological attachments. That was a time when the adulation of Hitler was feverishly spreading across the country - hence the fashion for a Hitler moustache among the young. Many were drawn to Hitler because he was fighting the British colonialists, and thinking that “my enemy’s enemy is my friend” believed that the advance of German forces favoured Iran’s independence. For others, however, the attraction went further and took on an ideological flavour.

Hitler’s main characteristic was his racism. Accordingly the Aryans, the master race, had lost their racial purity through intermixing with other races, in particular the Semitic race. Now through the blessing of the Hitlerite movement they must remove the other races and gradually, by means of an increase in the Aryan race and their absolute domination over the rest of the world, save the human race from disaster.

For Hitler the Jews were not a religion or even members of a nation, but members of the Semitic race. He was anti-Semitism rather than anti-Jewish. If he had opposed only their Judaism he could force them to renounce this religion. According to the author of “The History of the Jewish People” while the allies militarily defeated Hitler, he was relatively successful in his race war. The Jews of Europe were reduced from 11 to 5 million.
The play

Mazyar, a historic drama in three acts, was published in Tehran in 1933, the year Hitler became Chancellor. Mojtaba Minovi, Hedayat’s close collaborators in the “Rob’e” literary circle, wrote an extensive prologue in over 70 pages to the 50-page play where he describes the history of the Mazyar uprising against the Abbasid Caliphate [749 - 1258 AD] in Baghdad. Mazyar, an Estahban [2] in Tabarestan [3] was executed AD 838. There is also a short preface signed by both authors.

The play is based on a semi-historical, semi-mythical story where Bazist (alias Yahya), an Iranian astronomer in the Abbasid court, invites three Iranian Commanders named Babak, Afshin and Mazyar to rise up against the Islamic Caliphate, revive the Zoroastrian religion and “destroy the Arab race” (page 117). The Commanders fail in their independence movement. Babak succumbs first, betrayed by the brother of Sinbad - another rebel commander. Subsequently Mazyar is captured by the troops of Abdullah bin-Taher, and the plot by the third, Afshin, to assassinate the Abbasid Caliph in Samara is uncovered.

The first act takes place in Tabarestan at a time when the rebels are surrounded and on the threshold of defeat. Mazyar’s sole hope is to receive help from Afshin. Ali the son of Raban Tabari, Mazyar’s secretary, and Simru the wise old woman of Mazyar’s camp, both secretly in touch with the Arab army, are trying to get hold of the scroll letter that Afshin has sent Mazyar .

The second act takes place in a tavern in Tabarestan, where we find Mazyar with Shahrnaz, a foundling whose family the Arab troops had savagely murdered in front of her eyes. She is playing the harp while he drinks wine and conveys his love to her, telling her that there is no one left in the world for him but her. Suddenly Mazyar’s brother, Kuhyar, who had also betrayed him, bursts into the tavern accompanied by Arab troopers. They arrest Mazyar and ship him off to the caliph court.

The third act is in the Samara prison where Mazyar is held. Iranian prison guards are trying to arrange for Mazyar’s escape. Shahrnaz makes a brief visit to Mazyar and then on the belief that her lover cannot escape, takes a poison she had hidden in her signet ring soon. Her death causes Mazyar to lose his senses, become delirious and give up any plan to escape. Thus ends Mazyar’s historic drama in a personal tragic note.
Racial supremacy

Yet Sadegh Hedayat did not write the historic tragedy to try his hand as a playwright. His aim was to pass on a message which he describes as follows in the forward: “the history and exploits of such celebrated Iranians as Abu Muslim Khorasani, Barmakian, Afshin, Babak, and Mazyar, each of which is a delightful and important chapter in Iranian history, speaks of the bravery, resistance, intelligence, and resourcefulness of Iranians for two decades after the Arab conquest. They show that Iranians continued to fight for their independence, and had not forgotten the splendour and glory of the Sassanian [AD 227-642] era, nor forgotten their racial and intellectual superiority. To write the history of those times and to shed light on these living chapters of Iranian history is one of our vital tasks” (page 11).

It is worth noting that the writer does not talk of cultural or national superiority but specifically emphasises the racial superiority of Iranians. These elements approach the aim of supremacy seeking from different angles and therefore propose different solutions to their goal. We must now ask the question that in the Mazyar drama which is the superior race, what are its differences with the inferior race and what are the solutions proposed for racial rectification?

In the eyes of Sadegh Hedayat is the Iranian superior? The play is driven from beginning to end by Iran-worship. It might be argued we are witnessing merely a nationalistic viewpoint. But being “Iranian” is not a racial category and in order to look at it from this narrow racial angle we must prove that the writer associates it with white or Aryan races.

In the Mazyar drama we frequently encounter Iranians and Romans alongside one another while Arab and Jew are also lumped together (p 122). A clear example of the racial harmony between Iranian and Roman is once the Abassid Caliph has killed the Iranian Babak and the Roman Nanis, he smears both their heads in tar and hangs them side by side outside the city gates (p 123). The superior race is the white Aryan to which both Iranians and Romans belong.

As the play is based on the struggle of Mazyar against the Abbasid Caliphate, it appears at first sight that the enemy is the Arab people or Islam. But the more you read the more your realise that from Hedayat’s point of view “Jews” are as guilty in corrupting the Iranian race as the Arabs. It is true that there is much talk of cleansing the “Arab filth” (e.g. p 122), but in many places, including pages 11 and 129 there is open talk of “Semitic filth”. Even in notes at the end of the play the Tabari History [written in 923 AD] is cited where Mazyar always refers to the Muslims as Jews (p138). It may be difficult to imagine this today where the conflict between Palestine and Israel has highlighted the dispute between Islam and Judaism, but if we return to the conditions pertaining to the inter-war years, when Mazyar was written, an understanding of the issue is made very easy. From the ethnic point of view Arabs and Jews both belong to the Semitic race (p 125). It would be natural for Hedayat, who sees a return to ancient Iran as a sacred ideal, to see a connection between the genocidal policies of Hitler against the Jews and the struggle of ultra-nationalist Iranians against the Arab element.

To highlight “the Jews, this race worse than Arabs” (p 98) as the enemy of Iran is in fact the main message of this play. In act one we are introduced to Ali the son of Raban Tabari, Mazyar’s secretary, and Simru, the old woman in his organization. Both were previously Jews. Simru’s real name is Sara, and the secretary was a Jew before converting to Islam. According to Shadan on page 93 and according to Mazyar on page 95, it is these two who gnaw away at the Iranian resistance movement from the inside, and pave the way for the destruction of the anti-Arab movement.

In act one we discover that they had poisoned Mazyar’s food and are also trying to lay hands on the letter Afshin has written to Mazyar in order to assist Afshin’s arrest purge him from the caliph’s administration. In act two, Simru listens through a secret door to the conversation between Mazyar and Shahnaz in the tavern and thereby discovers Afshin’s plot against the caliph due to take place on the day of the Iranian Mehregan festival [4]. Thus although the Aryans and Jews belong to two religions, from an Iranian racist perspective, such as that of the author of Mazyar, they both belong to an inferior race, Semites, and should be regarded as a single enemy.
Racial annihilation

The next question is what was Hedayat’s solution for racial correction? How could the superior Iranian-Roman race save itself from the inferior Arab-Jewish race? Here the talk is of bloody cleansing and not cultural or even ethnic cleansing. Corruption was caused by racial intermixing (p 95). It is the half-Iranian half-Arab race that everywhere has sullied Iranian purity and caused the Arab and Islamic domination (p 11). If a person has Islamic blood from only one parent he or she assumes the meanness of the Arab (p 116). In addition to Ali, son of Raban and Simru, there are two more examples of this mixed parentage. One is Kuhyar, Mazyar’s brother who betrays him, and the other is Hassan ibn-Hossein who is a commander in the army of Abdollah ibn-Taher [5]. For Mazyar the reason for his brother’s betrayal is that his mother was an Arab slave (p 112), and that he had been corrupted through intermarriage with Arabs (p 111) and alliance with Jews (p 113). Hassan ibn-Hussein also comes from an Iranian-Arab mixed parentage.

In the face of blood contamination there is but one solution: blood settlement. The author unequivocally states that blood cleansing is the only possible through blood letting (p 130). The model for Mazyar is his grandfather Vandad Hormoz, who when he was governor [6] ordered Iranian women to hand over their Arab husbands, who were then hanged (p 96). Hedayat was writing at a time when in Germany the policy of exterminating Jews had begun.

Hedayat of course does not confine himself to racial superiority when he describes the era of Mazyar. He adds cultural and national superiority to the brew. For example he calls Zoroastrianism the “white religion” contrasting it with the “black religion” of the Semites (p 98). He writes of the “murderous Islamic flood” (p 9) and the “Arab Gog and Magog” (p 11). The Arabs and Muslims are enemies of industry and civilisation (p 118). The Muslims even copied the architecture for their mosques from Iranians. Their religion is full of superstitions. The Arab is base and barefoot (p 120). Their clothes is chapi agal - derived from the nosebag of beasts of burden (p 130). If they defeated Sassanian Iran it was not through military prowess or the popular attraction of their egalitarian promises, but through guile and scheming (pp 11 and 108). And despite trickery they are stupid and dim-witted (p 123). They are unrivalled in cruelty and all they do is severe hands and feet and torture (pp 106 and 131). They are greedy and lustful: while the Roman Nanis dies of hunger only after three days in prison, Musa ibn-Hareish, imprisoned because of adultery with the Caliph’s wife, has such a thick neck after three months in prison that they cannot severe it with an axe (p 122). Yet these same Arabs are presented as “satanic race of snake eaters” (p 10), rat eaters (p 100), lizard eating camel herdsmen (p 98) and hungry beggars (p 105). They cheat and are hypocrites in religious guise such that Hassan ibn-Hossein would drink wine out of sight of his colleagues (p 115). Thus Arabs are drained of all human attributes and become demons whose destruction and ethnic annihilation becomes easy for those believing in racial superiority.

Interestingly in Hedayat’s tale, Mazyar and Afshin try to popularise their revolt to annihilate the inferior race through myth making. They chose the Mehragan festival [see footnote 4], the same day the legendary Kaveh Ahangar revolted against the despot Zahhak [7]. Here Sadegh Hedayat apparently forgets that according to the poet Ferdowsi himself, Rustam the Iranian hero, was from his mother’s side Arab. What seems important for the author of Mazyar is the creation of a new myth for the racist movement that had occupied his mind, and that of many intellectuals of his generation in 1933.

Once acquainted with Hedayat’s racist and anti-Semitic views in Mazyar you ask yourself how can a man who wrote The Benefits of Vegetarianism and the story Vagrant Dog, and who was so sensitive to the killing and torment of animals, could be so insensitive to the bitter plight of millions of humans merely because they have a different religion or language? In my view the problem is in intellectual intolerance. Adolph Hitler was also a vegetarian. Intellectual bigotry is not just apparent in the Mazyar play. Extremist Iranism is one of the main characteristics of Hedayat’s literary creations during his first period as a writer.

One can see examples in the play Parvin, Daughter of Sassan (1930), stories such as The shadow of the Monguls (1931) and The last smile, the satires Al Besat al-Islamieh ilal bilad al-Faranjieh (1930) and Morvarid Cannon, and such investigative works as Owsaneh (1931), Nirangestan (1933), The Songs of Khayyam (1934), and the travelogue Isfahan, Half the World (1932). Omar Khayyam’s apostasy is presented as an example of the revolt of the Aryan spirit against Semitic beliefs. The superstitions of the people of Iran is ascribed to their intermixing with Arabs and Jews, and the growth of the architecture in Isfahan during the Safavid era [1501-1732] is credited to a return to Sassanian Iran.
No crocodile tears?

Like many of his generation, Hedayat was drawn to the Tudeh party after Reza Shah was removed from power by the Allies in 1941 because of his collaboration with Germany. Hedayat went on to write social stories such as Haji Agha and Tomorrow, and even travelled to Tashkent, capital of Uzbekistan, at the invitation of the Soviet authorities. Yet during this second phase he never officially repudiated the racial supremacy worldview of his earlier books.

Recently my colleague Naser Pakdaman published a hitherto unknown piece by Sadegh Hedayat in the 14th issue of the Journals of the Association of Iranian Writers in Exile, It was called Crocodile Tears and appeared under the pseudonym KZ in the first issue of Rahbar, the official organ of the Tudeh Party in the winter of 1942.

Posted by battle on May 10, 2009, 10:54 AM | #

Posted by Phil Peterson on April 17, 2006: “David Duke is a racialist. Islam is not a racialist religion. Your “hope” that he will convert to Islam is as wishful as the hope for those virgins waiting in heaven for the true believer.”

ISLAM IS OBVIOUSLY AN ARAB RELIGION:

“Sadeq Hedayat loathes the Arab Other, and abhors Islam as an Arab religion. Hedayat idealizes the pre-Islamic, Zoroastrian past as the Golden Age of Iran. In his view, Iran’s true cultural identity, shared with “Aryan” India, was destroyed by the Arab Muslim invaders, who replaced Iran’s superior civilization with the brutal and bloodthirsty culture and religion of their own.

“Mehdi Akhavan Sales, like Hedayat, blames the Muslim Arab invaders for destroying Iran’s true cultural identity and longs for a return to pre-Islamic Zoroastrian culture and greatness.  Akhavan decries “Semitic and Arabic and Islamic” influence on the “heritage of our own Aryan ancestors.” In so doing he echoes Hedayat’s view of Iranians and Arabs as two different and unequal races, one Aryan and superior, the other Semitic and inferior.

“Sadeq Chubak’s view differs only somewhat from that of Hedayat. In The Patient Stone, Iranian rootlessness and alienation are the result of history: the Arab Muslims destroyed a great Iranian civilization and could not replace it.

“Nader Naderpour rejects Arabs and Islam as alien, and fundamentally opposed to the true Iranian culture and values. “Here and There” repeats the same image of Arabs as found in Hedayat and Akhavan, as savage, alien intruders who have destroyed a superior Iranian civilization.  Nader Naderpour portrays the Arab Other as dark, savage and inhuman, in images of the irrational, blood and the moon; he portrays the Iranian Self as the creator of an enlightened civilization in images of Zoroastrian fire, the sun and springtime. Naderpour sees Islam not so much as wrong in itself, but wrong because it is Arab, and therefore backward and cruel. In “Here and There,” Naderpour compares the establishment of the Islamic Republic to the Arab Muslim conquest of the Sasanid empire, and suggests that it is in fact a continuation of that same defeat of superior Iranian culture at the hands of the ignorant and intolerant Arabs. In Naderpour’s view, to be a devout Muslim, or a supporter of the Islamic Republic of Iran, is to be Arab and therefore not Iranian, indeed therefore almost less than human. Like Hedayat, Chubak and Akhavan, his is an anti-Islamic and anti-Arab view.

http://www.iranian.com/Opinion/Sept97/IranArab/index.html

=========================================

“To be a Muslim you have to destroy your history, to stamp on your ancestral culture. The sands of Arabia is all that matters. This abolition of the self is worse than the colonial abolition, much worse.” --- VS Naipaul (Nobel Prize, Literature, 2001)

Posted by Daire on May 20, 2009, 11:57 PM | #

Muslims? No, you’re wrong, it isn’t the Muslims. It’s bad people. Islam clearly states that rape is a huge sin, considering it ruins a person’s life and totally defiles their purity. Raping someone is probably one of the fastest ways into hell in a Muslim’s belief. I see how you could point out that Muslims are the problem, but would it be the same case with all the rape Christians are doing amongst themselves, Afghanistan and Iraq? I don’t see Somalia invading Sweden, killing the men, and raping the women. Rape isn’t done by religions, it’s done by people. If a Catholic man raped a girl, you wouldn’t think of it as “Some damn Christian raped another girl”, You would think of it as a bad person doing evil things. Think about it. Don’t be fucking stupid.

Posted by Ms.V on May 27, 2009, 07:37 PM | #

Why can’t they just stay where they belong? CLOSE THE BORDERS!

Posted by Ertwel on June 04, 2009, 12:07 PM | #

Well its three years down the track and muslims are still piling into western nations.

Muslims have ruined “multiculturalism” for other peaceful migrants.

If the ministers will not listen, it wont be long until westerners take the matter to the
streets, cant see any mosques standing after that point!

Posted by shadow on August 15, 2009, 06:54 PM | #

Posted by J Richards on April 17, 2006, 07:10 PM | #

‘’To the Muslims who have posted here,

Islam allows Muslims men to rape women that their right hand possesses (slaves) and thereby justifies the rape of non-Muslim women in many scenarios.  Prophet Mohammed had a huge number of wives and concubines, and the holy Prophet Mohammed had sex with a pre-pubescent girl.  Does this not meet the definition of a sexual pervert?

You are deluded about the sexuality of whites.  Most whites are sexually moral people, but there is greater tolerance in Western societies, which allows greater freedom to the sexually immoral to indulge their passions.  On the other hand, your low intelligence and ignorance make you extrapolate the behavior of prostitutes in pornographic movies to white women in general!  The status of women in Islam is abysmal, and Islam is a disgrace to civilization by virtue of its intolerance and violence, among other things.’’

To the Joker called J Richards you’v just answered your own question. Most muslims are sexually moral people, but there is greater tolerance in Western societies, which allows greater freedom to the sexually immoral to indulge their passions.  Such horrible practices are most extensively supported by the open freedom these societies offer and has a cultural-religious flavor that should not be assigned to Islam.

Posted by jacob on September 05, 2009, 04:33 PM | #

Since when drug abuse has become racial? drug abuse is common irrespective of nationality or race. every drug addict should be given a chance to kick his addiction. everyone deserves a chance.

Malibu Drug Rehabilitation

Posted by dkdsujdsdk on October 23, 2009, 11:06 PM | #

i dont understand
why no one shoots these people here.

they ruin our countries-

and this whole thing is invasion of coloured people.

they with their barbaric gang culture come- none of them seem to have sympathy towards us- and when they are majority- they attack.

You can see it already in those areas they are majority.

finally all nmordic countries are ruined by these bullshitters.

when we tell this truth- police is sent to accuse us because of racism.

what kind of racists these people are?: in their home countries multiculturalism or christianity is punished by death!!!!!!

wake up- nordic morons.

our governments are the enemy!

1 immigrant from those countries brings soon 10-100 others with him,…

Posted by Saman on November 24, 2009, 07:02 PM | #

Those who contend that Islam is a peaceful religion are not fully conversant with its evil nature. As an ex-muslim I have read The damnatory book of Quran and I know how blatantly the hell-raising Allah encourages his followers to shed blood in his name. He goes even further and threatens its own followers of sodomy if they fail to stand to their duties. I hope to live in a world without Islam or any other religion.

Posted by valance on December 01, 2009, 05:39 AM | #

The increase of violence by Muslim immigrants towards the citizens of their adopted European countries is horrifying. Down here in New Zealand we have so far been spared from the ugly side of Islam, but as their numbers grow (we currently have around 50,000) I fear that us Kiwis will be in for the same type of treatment. Our politically correct politicians are welcoming Muslims with open arms and are seemingly blind to the strife that these immigrants are causing in other countries.

Militant Islam is alive and well just across the ditch from us in Australia and has been for several years. Many will remember the Cronulla riots of 2005. Instigated by Lebanese Muslim gangs the Aussies retaliated. Not surprisingly the leftist PC media shied away from condemning the Muslim gangs and instead blamed the Aussies for being ‘racist’ and causing the mayhem. These gangs intimidated business people, threatened to rape the girls cos of their bikinis, bashed lifeguards and basically terrorized the community. Any wonder the Aussies kicked back. Just a few months ago Muslim radicals were arrested for plotting to attack Aussie army barracks. Many Kiwis who have moved to Aussie over the years are now returning home because it’s just getting too dangerous over there.

But like in the European countries when citizens down here speak out against the dangers of Islam the politically correct machine brands them as racist, while the Muslims are looked upon as the victims.

While the violent side of Islam hasn’t reared its ugly head yet down here, Muslims are quietly trying to undermine the traditional Christian heritage of our society, such as calling for the removal of crosses or crucifixes from clock towers, hospital chapels and churches.

Posted by Fauzia Mujid on December 04, 2009, 01:04 AM | #

I seriously feel like slapping the guy who wrote this: “Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as “their women,” the women who “belong” to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hand. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime. “

You racist JERK get your facts straight before you start writing LIES about other people’s religion. And don’t tell me that because I’m saying this that I support rape because I am a sixteen-year-old girl and I can tell you that rape is in NO WAY suppported by Islam, Muhammad, the sunnah, or the Quran and in fact is punishable by death. That’s how seriously we take rape in Islam and if you know any Muslim who actually thinks the way you talked about in your articla, then just know that they are EXTREMISTS and can no longer be associated with Islam or be considered Muslims.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 04, 2009, 04:19 AM | #

Fauzia, can you explain why every white female in France, Britain, Belgium, Holland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark has been raped or gang-raped by Moslems?  What’s up with that?  I mean, rape exists everywhere among all races and cultures but you’re talking, in a place like, let’s take Sweden as an example:  literally every single Swedish female from age zero to age 110 has already been raped at least once or gang-raped by Moslems.  Can you explain this?  Is this our imagination or are these Moslems actually going around raping anything that moves?

Posted by Red Mercury on December 04, 2009, 04:21 AM | #

I guess slapping him is better than beheading him.

Posted by ruh roh shaggy on December 05, 2009, 06:31 PM | #

I can tell you that rape is in NO WAY suppported by Islam, Muhammad, the sunnah, or the Quran and in fact is punishable by death.

Islam is irrelevant; populations of Islamic faith are typically rural and primitively patriarchal, where abuse, rape and incest are very common among the poor. This is reflected in wretched natal care, stillbirths, deformities, etc. In other words it’s the society itself that is vicious and this viciousness is transferred to the freewheeling gals of the West.

I’ll never forget a photo I saw of a beautiful Pashtun girl, three years old, red-gold hair and big green eyes, one of them blackened and a cheek punched in by her father. You have to put yourself in these villages that aren’t the West where the father still controls life. If the father’s of bad character, the women and children suffer. There is no appeal. And Islam has never been sufficient to curb these human flaws.

Posted by Amy on December 05, 2009, 07:13 PM | #

JUST SHUT UR MOUTHS!!!! DONT DARE TO SPEAK ABOUT WHAT U DONT KNOW...GET TO KNOW ISLAM AND THEN SPEAK ABOUT US.........UR LANGUAGE ITSELF GIVES US AN INSIGHT TO UR RELIGION…

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 05, 2009, 07:33 PM | #

ruh-roh shaggy:  this blog isn’t an ideologically “anti-Patriarchy” site.  You’ll find scant sympathy here for the 20% of your intended message that amounts to cultural-marxoid, wymmynn’s lib-oid, “Jewishist liberalism"-oid ideological “anti-Patriarchy.” We’re not into that marxist ESS-AITCH-EYE-TEE so go peddle it elsewhere. 

The other 80-odd percent of your intended message, that which expresses horror at a father punching his three year old daughter in the face and the rest of it, is welcome here.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 05, 2009, 07:41 PM | #

“JUST SHUT UR MOUTHS!!!!” (—Amy)

No, you shut yours.  We’ll report what we see, Amy, and if the Moslem immigrants in Sweden and elsewhere in Whiteland act like mindless raping savages who continually rape every white female they see, we’ll report that.  And we’ll say what we think of it and of the people who do it.  If those people don’t like that let them change their behavior, and we’ll change what we report about them.

Posted by Boubacar Simms on December 05, 2009, 10:15 PM | #

Muslims aren’t as moral as they would like to make themselves appear. Go look up google trends for things like anal sex, gay sex, incest, and other degenerate crap and Muslim countries are always in the top three. Muslim girls and boys are often sodomized by family members too, it’s just part of life for them. In Egypt women can’t even walk down the street or sit on a bus without having some guy wanking off over her shoulder. Then you got places like India, Afghanistan, and Pakistan where hardly anyone works and they live with extended family members, this results in loads of young boys and girls getting sodomized by an uncle or cousin. Muslims like their Jewish cousins are obsessed with anal sex.

Posted by Gürel on January 01, 2010, 09:18 PM | #

Hi,
I’m very sad to hear that kind of news as a muslim from Turkey.

We hope we never hear that kind news again.

Posted by armchair quarterback on January 08, 2010, 07:19 AM | #

I would like to inform the audience that a similar scenario took place in Russia after the Union collapsed. Some of the newly established independent regimes enjoyed a series of below-the-radar ethic cleanses and subsequent white flight.

These days, it seems, the vast majority of crime and atrocities around the world is being committed by Muslims. Although I do not blame Islam per se - and I believe it is mandatory to outline that Islam is not a structured entity (as in ‘we do not believe in Limbo now’), what can be preached on one corner is not to be tolerated on another, I am leaning towards acknowledging that you people have made every effort to make your presence intolerable.

Unfortunately, your claim with respect to ‘us’ being occupied with projecting the wrongdoings of a bunch of unmannered immigrants to paint ‘Muslim culture in its entirety’ does not fly. EVERY civilised society in Europe is being exposed to a similar set of ‘cultural differences’, where ENORMOUS (2/3) proportions of certain types of crime involve non-white Muslim population. Logically, in case the issue had nothing to do with the barbaric nature of your culture, these numbers would be ‘shared’ among the locals and Polish, Romanian, Portuguese, Russian, etc, immigrants.

Certainly, a little deportation could not possibly hurt. Notwithstanding, I would also like to see a more developed legal system. Probably as innovative as prosecuting criminals on the basis of the environment that prevails in their country of origin (or their parents’). Most important, however, is that non-militant Muslim representatives should voice their contempt for these various barbaric actions.

Posted by lnfidel on January 10, 2010, 06:35 PM | #

Posted by Alain on May 09, 2009, 07:59 PM |
so… 2 swedish, 1 finn and 1 somali… but before arriving to this web i only read: a somalian gang… so tell me, is this a somalian gang? was this rape true? it seems not.

If you are too retarded to bother to read the whole passage, don’t even bother posting your ridiculous comments. The article states more than clearly, that state run censorship and marxist press ethics, would have us believe that the rapists were 2 Swedes, a Finn and a Somali, when i fact they all were ethnic Somalis. The treacherous scumbags that orchestrate this lie, in order to pacify the indigenous European people into appreciating the dystopia of multiculturalism, are guilty of high treason, as they, by withholding the truth, are assisting an old and vile enemy aspiring to colonize our lands, and what’s worse, without ever a shot been fired. Islam is the sworn enemy of the West, yet these cretins, devote themselves to prostituting our nations for oil and surrendering our people to an ideology that is bent on destroying our Judeo-Christian heritage.

The number of rapes committed by Muslims are so extremely high that it is impossible to view them only as random acts, but rather as a part of a warfare used to demoralize nations. Muhammad the arch pedophile, himself indulged in raping enslaved bodies of girls, and prisoners of war, he claimed as war booty, thus giving justification to these hideous acts, as he is viewed to be a perfect human being whose behavior every devout muslim is to emulate.

The only way to save Western civilization from its democratic and over tolerant pathetic self, is to change the constitution, so that the vengeful sword of majority rule will be brought down to bear upon fascistoid ideologies, trying to use constitutionally granted freedoms and rights, to destroy our civilization from within.

Measures I hope will come into effect already during my lifetime:

*End to all muslim immigration to our countries.
*Revoked citizenship and repatriation of all foreigners that indulge in serious acts of crime.
*Ban on building new mosques.
*The Qur’an banned due to the hatred and violence it incites against non-Muslims.
*Tribunals, to charge with high treason (a crime once was punishable by death but these days only renders life imprisonment), the pseudo-humanists, irresponsible political trendsetters, quasi-intellectuals and wishy-washy journalists from leftist-controlled MSM, that are guilty of selling out our nations.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 10, 2010, 07:44 PM | #

“*Tribunals, to charge with high treason (a crime once was punishable by death but these days only renders life imprisonment), the pseudo-humanists, irresponsible political trendsetters, quasi-intellectuals and wishy-washy journalists from leftist-controlled MSM, that are guilty of selling out our nations.” (—infidel)

And those wealthy behind-the-scenes individuals who get their bought marionettes like Bush and Blair elected in the first place then give them their marching orders once in office, ordering them to open the borders wide and keep them open no matter what hue and cry goes up from the populace.  These shadowy figures behind the scenes who are doing this to us, whom we never see clearly or never at all, are the ones Steven Palese meant when he said, “Something’s blocking the democratic process.” Something’s blocking it all right.  And on the day the arrest warrants go out and these culprits dash to the nearest airport to catch the first flight out, something will be blocking the planes from taking off.

Posted by lnfidel on January 11, 2010, 07:19 PM | #

And those wealthy behind-the-scenes individuals who get their bought marionettes like Bush and Blair elected in the first place then give them their marching orders once in office, ordering them to open the borders wide and keep them open no matter what hue and cry goes up from the populace.  These shadowy figures behind the scenes who are doing this to us, whom we never see clearly or never at all, are the ones Steven Palese meant when he said, “Something’s blocking the democratic process.” Something’s blocking it all right.  And on the day the arrest warrants go out and these culprits dash to the nearest airport to catch the first flight out, something will be blocking the planes from taking off.

Hehe Fred Scrooby, excellently put!  May that day of reckoning arrive soon, so that the scoundrels that have orchestrated the biggest scam in world history, by among other things, force-feeding their own people a hostile ideology, and pursuing vote cultivation by impregnating the lands of their people with an incompatible culture at odds with their way of life, that in essence would come to undermine cultural affinity, destroy national identity, and turn over half a billion people (present population of The EU) into a rootless, passive and easily controllable mass, to be enslaved under the yoke of a foreign god, get what’s coming to them.

Posted by lnfidel on January 11, 2010, 07:25 PM | #

*Correction* meant -with foreigners from an incompatible culture at odds with their way of life-

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 11, 2010, 07:33 PM | #

”May that day of reckoning arrive soon, so that the scoundrels that have orchestrated the biggest scam in world history, by among other things, force-feeding their own people a hostile ideology, and pursuing vote cultivation by impregnating the lands of their people with foreigners from an incompatible culture at odds with their way of life, that in essence would come to undermine cultural affinity, destroy national identity, and turn over half a billion people (present population of The EU) into a rootless, passive and easily controllable mass, to be enslaved under the yoke of a foreign god, get what’s coming to them.” (—Infidel)

Amen to that, comrade.  Speed the day!  May God grant it come to pass!

Posted by Just Me on January 15, 2010, 01:02 AM | #

Posted by Daud Kadir on April 18, 2006, 01:39 PM | #

Women in the west is pervert mentality society.When they are born normal,most of them lost their virginity or commit incest within their family structure.[..] Unlike muslim women,even they are involve in bizarre sex

I have to say that of the 3 Muslim women I (as white Christian) had sex with in my life so far, all of them were more open to bizarre sex and things that European women usually would never do in the first night that I can only wonder what the world would be like if the Muslim women were not so well-behaved and moral as you claim.

Excuse me? Oh, of course, you’re right - these must have been spoilt by living in Europe, how could I be so blind not to see the obvious here.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 19, 2010, 01:55 AM | #

Latest news from the new, very much improved, & exceedingly vibrant Norway:

All 21 reported cases of rape with aggravated assault — the highest number since records were started — in the Norwegian capital of Oslo last year were committed by “non-Western immigrants” and 90 percent of all rape victims were Norwegian women, police have announced.  Oslo police spokesman Hanne Kristine Rohde defied the strictures of political correctness to release the figures in an interview on the national Norwegian broadcaster, NRK.  She said she was aware that the “statistics are controversial.”

When she was asked by NRK if the police were not “stigmatising an entire community” by releasing the statistics, Ms Rohde said she “wants to contribute to a better and safe world.  That’s why the truth needs to be told.  I hope the debate will focus on that,” she told NRK.

According to the police figures, the number of rapes with violent assault committed in Oslo also doubled compared to 2008.  According to the police statement, “in each and every case, not only in 2008 and 2009 but also in 2007, the offender was a non-Western immigrant.  At the same time, in 9 out of 10 cases, the victim was Norwegian, not just by nationality, but also by ethnicity.” The NRK report concluded that “not a single one of the offenders had a Western background.  Four people have been arrested.  In all other cases, the victims reported that the offenders either looked like non-Western immigrants, or they spoke a non-Western language.  Not a single case has been connected to a Western man.”

According to official figures released in 2008, Third World immigration accounted for 25 percent of Oslo’s population.  Data from the city and state statistics bureau shows that of Oslo’s 560,484 residents, 137,878 were immigrants.  The largest single immigrant group continues to be from Pakistan.  Next in line is Somalia.  Other countries with relatively large immigrant groups in Oslo include Sri Lanka, Iraq, Turkey, Vietnam and Iran.

In addition, an ever growing group of Third World immigrants is dependent on welfare.  A study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research and the University of Oslo concluded that immigration has increased the pressure on the welfare state, because many immigrants do not join the tax-paying part of the population.  Third World immigrants are, the study showed, recipients of social security benefits at a rate ten times that of native Norwegians — destroying the liberal argument used by pro-immigration politicians in Norway that immigration was necessary to maintain the social welfare state.  More than half of all social security benefits in the city of Oslo are spent on non-Western immigrants. Immigrants from Africa have the highest unemployment rate, with official figures in 2005 showing a black unemployment rate of 17.5 percent.  Immigrants from Asia had an unemployment rate of 12.3 percent, while those from South and Central America had an unemployment rate of 10.1 percent.

The average unemployment rate amongst native Norwegians was 2.4 percent.

[ http://bnp.org.uk/2010/01/norway-pays-bitter-price-for-mass-third-world-immigration/ ]

Sincere thanks go out to the (fill in the blank) _______ for ramming that down Norway’s throat:  thank you.

Posted by Johnson on February 05, 2010, 03:45 AM | #

I don’t hate Muslims, but you have no right to make any remarks about racism in Western Nations. 20% of the inhabitants of Mauritania are slaves mostly blacks to lighter skinned Arabs. And in the Sudan the genocide in Darfur, the tiny Arab minority dealt with blacks as less than human, in history they have beat them, raped them, enslaved most of them, and killed them and now that they finally dared to rebel as Arab singer women say, black blood has been spilled like water. And many Muslim Government leaders proceeded to then shake hands with the President of the Sudan and deny the truth. As for Zionism, the west is ignoring what is a simple truth Hamas and Hezbollah are plotting genocide against the Israeli people. Want proof they as I mentioned deny Darfur, they also deny the Holocaust, they unlauch a wave of anti-Semitic material even in children’s shows, they even ban the Diary of Anne Frank as being Zionist propoganda. They are murders elected democratically or not they should be on trial for incitement to genocide.

Posted by test on March 10, 2010, 10:52 PM | #

I just don’t get it. Folks from Sweden, kick out these arabs from your country!