NYT June 26, 1965: IMMIGRATION LAW PRAISED BY DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION (NOT!)

Since the preamble of the US Constitution specifies the purpose of the government was to “secure the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity”, it is rather significant when the New York Times wheels out a symbol of that “posterity” such as “The Daughters of the American Revolution”, as they did on June 26 of 1965 during the debate over the revolutionary Immigration and Nationalities Act of 1965, the chief debate issue over which was whether it would replace that posterity with other nationalities. Proponents claimed it would not. Opponents claimed it would.

The NYT’s principle headline read “IMMIGRATION LAW PRAISED BY D.A.R.”

So it looks like the posterity’s own watch-dog group, itself didn’t see it as a threat, just as John Derbyshire would today have us believe.

But wait.... here’s the first sentence of the article:

The Daughters of the American Revolution said today that President Johnson’s bill to abolish the national origins quota system of immigration would destroy “a first-line of defense in perpetuating our institutions of freedom and the American way of life.”

Gross incompetence in headline writing or gross mendacity by the US’s ”newspaper of record”?

Either way, one can hardly claim that the posterity of the Founders suddenly decided in 1965, that the purpose upon which the US was founded had become obsolete, their rights alienable and hence embraced their revolutionary replacement by other nationalities.

Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, May 31, 2007 at 03:09 PM in
Comments (0) | Tell a friend

Comments:

No comments yet.

Next entry: Pauline Hanson and the abuse of DNAPrint testing for multicultural ends

Previous entry: Forrester's Limits To Growth Model For Your Personal Computer

Existential Issues

Of note

Recent Comments

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 11:11 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view)

Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view)

James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view)

PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view)

Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view)

GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view)

Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view)

danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view)

qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view)

Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view)

Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view)

Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

Science Categories

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa