Obama’s Letter on Nomination of David Palmer to the EEOC

Posted by Bo Sears on August 16, 2007, 04:28 AM | #

I’m glad this topic has finally arrived on this blog. Here are some things that we must think about when we think abour US Senator Obama. Fundamentally, his principal campaign promise is that he is a uniter.

However, and please think about this, he utterly fails to provide his own concept for his own half black & half white status. I don’t hold his ancestry against him, but I do hold against him the fact that he has no idea how to conceptualize his mixed status.

Tiger Woods has arrived at a modus vivendi regarding his mixed race status, and honors all sides of his family, for example.

But Obama has focused himself almost obsessively on his father’s side of the family. He has joined a “blacker-than black” church in Chicago, and he rarely if ever speaks favorably of his mother or her parents who raised him when his bigamist father deserted the mother. (Yes, Obama’s father was married to an African woman when he pretended to marry Obama’s mother.)

The sins of the father should not be visited on the son, of course, but when we interrogate the son’s attitudes toward his ancestors in public discourse (which we have to do for all candidates), we find a serious turning away from his mother’s family and an embracing of his father’s family. It shows in every scrap of his rhetoric, except for his ghost-written speeches about unity.

How can we expect a politician to embrace real unity in the USA when he cannot manage it in his own life? Were he a private citizen, it would be his own business, but he isn’t a private citizen.

We also know that he has a serious problem avoiding anti-white slurs and has even promoted one of the most loathsome slurs, “acting white.” A quick look at Google or Yahoo will demonstrate that he is almost the sole author of the come-back of that slur.

Doubt it’s a slur? What would you think if you heard “acting black”? Or “acting Jewish”? Or “acting Mexican”? Automatic social disapproval. Yet even the advance guard of white thinkers seem unwilling to hear the malice in “acting white.” It’s also a little like “model minority” used about Asians—it condenses Asians into a homogeneous clump of identical folks, all equally successful and educated. They howl when they hear that one!

Why no howling when we hear an obviously left-wing racialist like Obama uttering “acting white” over and over again just as though it is a legitimate label for whites, and something for blacks to avoid. We actually see hissy-fits when residents of the USA call themselves “Americans,” yet no one minds Obama’s contribution to hate speech.

Do we ever get mad at the left-wing racialists all around us? No, we just call them “anti-racists” when they are some of the biggest haters on the planet.

Posted by Maguire on August 16, 2007, 03:46 PM | #

Obama’s letter is a good reminder of how the political system in the USA actually works today.  It’s structured just like a rabbit hunt using dogs to drive the rabbits in front of the real hunters’ guns.

The rabbit is the voter, and the barking dogs are the terrifying opposition who drive the rabbit to run in front of the guns of the true hunters.  Followed by Bang! 

There are even people posting here who are still running in terror from a barking bitch named Hillary and thinking that safe refuge, or at least non-lethal conditions, awaits them if only they can get under the Globo Republican’s guns.

They thought this in Y2K and they still think this today.  I used to wonder how such people managed to keep homes, but even this question is being answered by the New Conditions in the market.

M

Posted by James Bowery on August 16, 2007, 07:30 PM | #

Obama isn’t simply racialist—he is anti-white.  This sort of thing evidences genetic dominance of the Y chromosome along with the general geographic structure of the Y chromosome.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a “unifer” only in the sense that government supported rape is a “unifier”.  If you think a woman should sexually accept a man and that the only reason she doesn’t is that she hates him, the solution to her hate is not to hold her down while he rapes her.

In the new Declaration of Independence, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 should top the enumerated offenses of the tyranny.

Posted by a Finn on August 17, 2007, 02:53 AM | #

Off-topic: Something to ponder;

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070729_amnesty.htm

http://www.vdare.com/rubenstein/070731_nd.htm

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/80fa0a2c-49ef-11dc-9ffe-0000779fd2ac.html

Posted by Top on August 17, 2007, 05:02 AM | #

“This sort of thing evidences genetic dominance of the Y chromosome along with the general geographic structure of the Y chromosome. “

James, I have been thinking about what you have been saying quite a bit lately.

Here are some of my thoughts…

If the Germans and Japs won WW2 would your statement above still hold?  Or is the result of WW2 a subset of that assertion?  Or is it independent?

Once the recessive white race truly understands that they face total annihilation - will they still honor Civil Rights Acts?  Or will they simply fade like they are fading in Africa and South America?

Isn’t it it true that the greatest danger to whites are those whites who are willing to use violence against other whites to ensure the dominance of Asians and Africans.  For example, isn’t that USA - the country that is most willing to use violence against whites - TODAY!?

What about the minority of whites who are not affected by the parasitic effects that the more dominant races use to hypnotize whites?  Will their energy ever be enough to overcome the psychic aggression of non-whites -> especially the more clever variety that semites produce?

If there were no weapons of mass destruction, which hold white countries in a strategic stalemate, would whites not continue with agressive wars that could only help our situation?

Can the white misfortune not be attributed to the circumstances of our time - where the advancement of our civilization caused low birth rates and unfocused, corrupt leadership?

I am basically looking for things beyond biology - even though most whites (without sufficient leadership) are easy prey for the more dominant races. 

Hmmm....

Posted by Top on August 17, 2007, 05:33 AM | #

On the specific topic of Obama.  What is the most dangerous thing about Obama?  Is it the fact that the anti-white media machine is pushing him aggressively because they sense real weakness for the first time?  Is it that we could have a politically naive, anti-white person pseudo-controlling nuclear weapons?  Or is it the fact that millions of whites chant his name in a hypnotic trance - worshipping him like some sort of a god? 

For whatever reason the worship of non-white authority figures is the strongest in USA.  I don’t see any other white countriese having the same collective mastrubation fantasies to non-white authority figures.  Has even Brazil had a black president or vice-president?

How will all those white American generals obey orders if Clinton/Obama give the orders?  Will all those rural white boys die for them? 

This is how ancient Rome must have felt psychologically when the native popualtion birth rates felt.  The historical cycles are apparent.  But… this time we have weapons of mass destrruction, which the shrinking Roman population did not have.  How is it all gonna play out?  It seems obvious that we have entered the age of collapse/destruction - it’s just a matter of time before the fragile global alliances untangle. 

The escape route for most of our genes will be very narrow.  I hope to see you on the other side!

Posted by James Bowery on August 17, 2007, 06:37 AM | #

Top, my hypothesis is that memes are extended phenotypes of genes and that whites are more memetically determined than more “genetically dominant” races.  If the Germans had “won” much depends on the actual character of the details of the armistice and the resulting regimes, but there would have been at least one country which was imposing public health measures to counter the memetic biotoxins put out by Jewish control of mass media and academia—biotoxins to which Jews are relatively immune by virtue of their long urban evolution.  I suspect in that situation far less toxic memes would have come out of Italy and dominated the Germans who were already using the iconography of the Roman Empire.  However, the Zionists would have postured Israel as a German creation would toady up to the Germans in competition with the Italians in order to gain ecological access again but under an “Aryan Jew” identity.

The real question is whether in these circumstances the Germans would be able to engage in the kind of free thought that would have avoided the half century of intellectual confusion that actually infected the West and led to real public health science regarding the group metabolic pathways of genes to memes hence ecological disasters such as we’re experiencing.

I don’t know the answer but I do know that we’re presently like a primitive tribe whose members have been infected with a venereal disease that makes them more sexually active and passes it on while sterilizing the members—we have no idea why no children are being born and we have no conception of transmissible disease—we’re making up theories and doing so under the psychological pressure of not wanting to deny our urges.

Posted by James Bowery on August 17, 2007, 06:41 AM | #

Erratum:

...West and led to real public health…

should read:

...West.  Free thought that would have led to read public health…

Posted by Bo Sears on August 17, 2007, 02:48 PM | #

James says, “This sort of thing evidences genetic dominance of the Y chromosome along with the general geographic structure of the Y chromosome.”

I gather by this remark that James is suggesting that the fatherly portion of the inheritance dominates the mixture. And I imagine this idea is a sub-set of EGI theory, but I wonder what sort of evidence exists that mixed marriages with black fathers and white mothers yield black-identifying children, and that mixed marriages with white fathers and black mothers yield white-identifying children?

If the answer is that the latter example is different from the former because the white portion of that mixture is diluted with a greater mimetical basis, then we know where we stand.

By the way, “whiteness” at least as a color is not at all recessive. It dominates in far more than half of all Asian & Mexican mixes in the first generation (as to appearance) in California, and if that first generation child marries white, the next generation’s phenotype is indistinguishable from white people.

Benito Juarez is a good example. As black as a pure-blooded Mexican Indian could be, he married blonde. His sons married blonde. And all of his descendants today look whiter than white...I mean they are cream & peaches white, and they don’t identify Indian at all.

I wonder where this idea that whiteness is recessive came from. We are not a delicate form or phenotype. We’re actually pretty tough.

Posted by jonathan on August 17, 2007, 03:20 PM | #

Bo, in regard to ‘Indians,’ I’ve recently aquired a -IMO- an amazing painting by a member of the Zuni tribe out of SW united states. It’s dreamlike traditional dancemasks quality and yellow sky fade to blue (Goethe-esque?), once again IMO, puts Dali (nazi sympathizer?) in an underclass. The surface also has a uniform ‘grit,’ a tactile fuzziness that I don’t get from Dali’s airbrushed appearing reproductions. Maybe I’ll get to obseve the Persistence of Memory stylings someday if I visit his dedicated museum in Florida. The world is so overwhelming -for me-, ‘acting blue’ may be the next option.

Posted by James Bowery on August 17, 2007, 07:47 PM | #

It’s pretty funny to watch the ends of the political spectrum react to my hypothesis that distance from human origins correlates with recessiveness due to loss of function mutations.  The leftists say—“Aha!  Caught you!  Asians and Amerindians are further from human origins than Europeans, Nazi Insect Boy!!!” The rightist detractors like Bo, on the other hand, point to the fact that we frequently see blondism and other “recessive” traits showing up with “surprising” frequency in couplings between Europeans and Asians and Amerindians, so obviously, I’m not taking reality into account.

Posted by Bo Sears on August 18, 2007, 02:22 AM | #

“The rightist detractors like Bo, on the other hand, point to the fact that we frequently see blondism and other “recessive” traits showing up with “surprising” frequency in couplings between Europeans and Asians and Amerindians, so obviously, I’m not taking reality into account.”

Okay, that’s a misreading so far from what I said or think, I have to wonder.

Posted by Astro Bojo on January 24, 2010, 03:34 PM | #

Those of you who wanted to keep your way of life, that is owning a slave, getting free labor, are struggling in accepting the fact that most people whom you kept by law from getting education, bar from main stream association, are now claiming their right back. People like Bo Searsm and others are sending mixed signals behind the screen, which I am sure they will not utter in public.
What I want to say is in the past people as Clarence Thomas has been used to make EEOC a weak agency, I hope this administration will help the agency do what it is mandated to do.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 24, 2010, 04:12 PM | #

Astro Bojo, whites don’t want the society they created overthrown or replaced or the white people in it, their own people in other words, replaced.  If you can work within those restrictions, fine.  Whites don’t object to a few non-whites in white society doing their thing, getting ahead as best they can, what-have-you.  But what non-whites and the Jews who stirred them up want, namely the whole shooting match turned over to non-whites, no.  If you want that you need to go elsewhere, make your own society and do what you want in it, etc.  Or go to Israel, the home of the Jews who supposedly love you so much and keep stirring you up against us — surely they’ll love having you over there and will allow you the run of the place.  I’m certain of it. 

As for owning slaves, whites settled that controversy entirely among themselves long ago with Britain’s outlawing of slave traffic and later the series of events that coincided with and followed Lincoln’s War of Northern Aggression in the U.S.