Oh for G-d’s sake: insane miscegenation propaganda

Posted by Fred Scrooby on December 15, 2008, 01:42 AM | #

Newgirl and Proudgypsy must also be SWTang then.  Good detective work by n/a.  (Something tells me Tang is also homosexual.  Just a feeling from his wording here and there.  Could be wrong of course.)

Posted by Dave Johns on December 15, 2008, 02:32 AM | #

“Something tells me Tang is also homosexual.”

I’ve found most people that are anti-white, are either Jews, or homosexuals. Moreover, many are virulent anti-Christian atheists. Rosie O’Donnell, for example, comes to mind.

Posted by whiteprideforever on December 15, 2008, 03:09 PM | #

All these fuckers are anti-white jerks. Just ignore them. White pride forever. If it’s brown, flush it down!

Posted by whiteprideforever on December 15, 2008, 03:14 PM | #

I wish the Nazis finished what they’d started. God bless the late saint hitler. He worked to save our race.

Posted by Daniel on December 16, 2008, 04:20 AM | #

Ok, I’m a certified blond-haired, blue-eyed white guy and I think that this site is complete bullsh*t. I’ve been attracted to all sorts of girls, and I find mixed race asian/white and latin-american/white to be the most beautiful of all. And don’t even go on about how I just say that because I can’t get a white girl (like you did to another guy who commented your blog complaining about non-white women representing Scandinavian countries in some beauty pageant). I’m young (just turned 18), good-looking, I have a nice car, and I keep in shape (surf, lift weights etc.). I have always had my pick of girls and I have dated more white girls than any other race- probably because they are the most available to me, seeing as I live in a mostly white area. Don’t tell me that I’m an anomaly- I’m pretty sure all my white friends feel the same way I do, more or less. And don’t even think about calling me a Jew… I was raised Episcopalian, and I’m just as suspicious of them as the next guy.

Dont get me wrong, I think that white girls are really hot, but they tend to have their flaws just like all the other flavors- and they definitely do not have a monopoly on good-looks.

The Pros and Cons of White Girls:
Pros: Different hair and eye colors, aquiline noses, pink nipples, nice bodies when taken care of.
Cons: Thin lips (which I hate- makes me feel like I’m kissing a guy), sharp facial features (esp. the chin), sometimes too pale (burns easily in the sun), bland, tendency to gain weight, age poorly.

Also, I don’t neccessarily find Nordic white women to be the hottest white women out there. Slavic and Mediterranean white women gives them a good run for their money (think Petra Nemcova and Monica Bellucci).

One of the hottest girls in my school is half asian and half white:

Here are some more beautiful mixed-race girls:

Lol, if race mixing produces the likes of Adriana Lima (who is a mix of white, AmerIndian, Japanese, and Caribbean Black), then I really can’t see myself objecting to it . And have you ever even seen the girls in those rap videos? I think you’d have to be a homosexual not to find those girls (and the way that they dance) sexy.

And don’t tell me that I’m only attracted to them because they are part white. Here are some pure asian cuties that I’d love to get with (I would post some African-American girls or some Latinas… but I can’t be sure that they don’t have some white admixture):

I don’t see anything “primitive” or masculine about them.

You’re wasting your time with this site. No matter how many unflattering pictures you post, diagrams you draw, and degrading adjectives you throw together- you will never convince anyone who hasn’t already convinced themselves on the matter. Nothing you do here will keep this woman from being freaking gorgeous, or white guys like me from wanting her.

You praise sexual selection, but that is one of the main causes of miscegenation. You need a new hobby, my friend.

Btw, I don’t find either the girl on the cover of the Jew’s book, or the blonde in the pic you posted to be particularly attractive. The mixed girl has nice lips, but her nose is too big and she’s boring and sort of masculine. The blonde girl has nice eyes and tits, but her lips are so thin, she has a manly face-shape (forehead & chin), her eyebrows are drawn on, and she looks trashy. You should post pics of better white girls if you’re going to pretend to convince anyone.

Posted by silver on December 16, 2008, 05:51 AM | #

Lol, if race mixing produces the likes of Adriana Lima (who is a mix of white, AmerIndian, Japanese, and Caribbean Black), then I really can’t see myself objecting to it

Well it doesn’t, I’m afraid.  You’ve picked what is likely the very best example of such a mix and that alone should tell you how often such results can be expected to occur—almost never.  Of course, you also have to consider that she’s supremely unlikely to pass on such beauty to her offspring, since there is an overwhelming likelihood that her Indio, Asian and African genes will recombine in a fashion more in line with what the average of such mixes produces (ie nothing to write home about).

You’re wasting your time with this site. No matter how many unflattering pictures you post, diagrams you draw, and degrading adjectives you throw together- you will never convince anyone who hasn’t already convinced themselves on the matter. Nothing you do here will keep this woman from being freaking gorgeous, or white guys like me from wanting her.

The purpose of the site, in a minimal sense, is to raise awareness of the issues at hand, not to prevent from finding women of other races attractive.  The political aim of this site is to secure an existence for (northerly) whites, and it provides a variety of arguments to that end.  One of those is to ask northerly Europeans (but the argument logically extends to other ‘at risk’ types, too—such as S. Europeans) to consider what they’ll be losing by miscegenating themselves out of existence.  That won’t convince everyone (it doesn’t seem to have begun to convince you), but that’s not to say the argument is completely without merit.  In fact, the argument goes much farther.  It’s really saying that not only will northerly Europeans find themselves swamped and dispossessed by people who largely don’t like them or their way of life, look at what else they’ll lose in the process. 

Times being what they are, I doubt anyone would attempt to persuade you not to bang Asians if you have a thing for them.  I’m recently returned from a sojourn in Thailand, as a matter of fact.  Not bad people.  Not bad women.  But, meh, I had the pick of them but I had to look long and hard for something that really stirred my loins.  I’m sorry.  I haven’t the slightest wish to offend them or their ways, but to lose my sort (I’m a rather obvious S. European—a little out of place here, but very much a sympathizer) to them would be an incomparable tragedy in my eyes.  Friend, have your fun with them, but why not spare a thought for your own kind too?  It’s not evil to have an ultimate preference for your own kind; you can quite easily enjoy a warm feeling towards many an other in the process.  (Hell, I’d hardly be here shaking you by the lapels demanding you hate me! Lol.)

Posted by silver on December 16, 2008, 06:43 AM | #

I’m shocked anyone was actually taken in by this weak troll—that’s literally the worst impression of an “African American” I’ve ever seen.

It quickly deteriorated, but that first post sounded pretty authentic—enough to get me, anyway.  Then again, I have very little experience with blacks.  I tried talking to them when I arrived in America but gave it up pretty quickly. (Might have more soon, though: some refugees (probably) just moved into a rental across the street from my parents.  Bastards.  This is the best area in this small city.) Some blacks can hold a conversation, though.  I don’t know why you insist on jumping down their throats with nigger this and nigger that whenever they make an appearance.  What I said is undeniably true: they’d be far better off independent than treated like shit by hispanics.  That’s a point very much worth reinforcing.

‘Improvement’ to the ironing board?

God, if I were black I’d openly laugh myself silly at these sorts of claims, and recommend everyone else do too.  If that isn’t a spoof, it’s by far the funniest thing I’ve read all week (actually, it is even then).

Posted by n/a on December 16, 2008, 07:01 AM | #

I’m a certified blond-haired, blue-eyed white guy

No, you’re not. You’re a (dyed-blonde, brown-eyed) non-white girl.

This is blatantly obvious to me, and Gender Genie agrees:

Words: 641
(NOTE: The genie works best on texts of more than 500 words.)

Female Score: 898
Male Score: 734

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

you will never convince anyone who hasn’t already convinced themselves on the matter

So what are you doing here? Who exactly are you trying to convince? Yourself?

Posted by n/a on December 16, 2008, 09:02 AM | #

It quickly deteriorated, but that first post sounded pretty authentic—enough to get me, anyway.

For me, about every single note was off.

“they bitch about their race being outbred by all minority people, like me, African Americans”

The first sentence was bad. This one is even less convincing, for reasons I won’t enumerate.

“On the other hand, they say that blacks can’t get chicks”

No one says this. Major giveaway we’re dealing with an Asian and someone who doesn’t live in the U.S.

“I’ve lived in the ‘hood all my life, and never seen any of my homeboys or girls act this way.”

This might have barely scraped by as authentic American negro diction . . . in 1989.

“cream cheeks”, “dinky”

Again, obviously not from America. At this point, I googled “cream cheeks"[an extremely unusual (dumb) insult I’d never seen before]+"white men” and immediately located the earlier posts by swtang78.

Incidentally, I also found an swtang78 photobucket account, which I’ll post since t-boy has chosen to continue spamming this site.

“Shake in your boots and tremble with fear” as “asian stud” ccmp/newgirl brandishes an AK.

Real name Billy Widjaja?

Plate number: 481 JTU (Queensland)

Posted by Daniel on December 16, 2008, 10:34 PM | #

Well it doesn’t, I’m afraid.  You’ve picked what is likely the very best example of such a mix and that alone should tell you how often such results can be expected to occur—almost never.  Of course, you also have to consider that she’s supremely unlikely to pass on such beauty to her offspring, since there is an overwhelming likelihood that her Indio, Asian and African genes will recombine in a fashion more in line with what the average of such mixes produces (ie nothing to write home about).

Times being what they are, I doubt anyone would attempt to persuade you not to bang Asians if you have a thing for them.  I’m recently returned from a sojourn in Thailand, as a matter of fact.  Not bad people.  Not bad women.  But, meh, I had the pick of them but I had to look long and hard for something that really stirred my loins.  I’m sorry.  I haven’t the slightest wish to offend them or their ways, but to lose my sort (I’m a rather obvious S. European—a little out of place here, but very much a sympathizer) to them would be an incomparable tragedy in my eyes.  Friend, have your fun with them, but why not spare a thought for your own kind too?  It’s not evil to have an ultimate preference for your own kind; you can quite easily enjoy a warm feeling towards many an other in the process.  (Hell, I’d hardly be here shaking you by the lapels demanding you hate me! Lol.)

Hey, you seem like a reasonable guy, but I can’t agree with you that race-mixing only produces an Adriana Lima every one in a blue moon. There are plently of gorgeous-looking mixed chicks out there, I just posted a whole bunch of pics of them. At my school there are a lot of asian/white hybrids and most of them are really hot. Alot of actresses and models are mixed to (Jessica Alba, Megan Fox, alot of those other Brazilian Victoria Secret models, etc.). I have no problems with people who don’t want to date outside their race- everyone has their preferences. A friend of mine only dates blondes, and there’s nothing wrong with that. But don’t give me crap for liking what I like. When it comes down to it, it’s all subjective anyway. Certain people like certain looks- to each his own and all that.

I got to say that I haven’t really looked over all of this site, but, from what I’ve seen, it’s a whole bunch of bullsh*t about trying to “prove” somehow that Nordic white women are superior to all other varieties of women. This simply isn’t true. In my personal experience, Eurasian and white/latin-american mixes do it for me. Of course, if a hot white girl came my way, I wouldn’t hesitate. I’m only 18, so I don’t really think too much about who I’m going to marry and breed with yet. I think it’s safe to say though that race isn’t going to be an issue- of course, she has to fit the criteria of being hot, smart, fun to be around, a good screw, and a good person. I guess want someone that will blow my mind, that I’ll be in love with. I’m kind of mushy like that.

As for sympathizing with White Nationalists- I do on some points. I think that affirmative action is hypocritical and just plain stupid. I’m sick and tired of the NAACP and all of those other bullsh*t organizations- they have long since worn out their purpose. I hate how it’s considered racist if I show any sort of pride in my white heritage (my Biology teacher tried to open a German-language club at my school, but was barred by the administration- that really pissed me off). And I hate the double-standard that allows blacks to say things that they would be publicly shunned for saying if they were white. But this whole movement looses me with the talk of expelling decent, productive non-whites from their homes… and with all the delusional talk of non-white and mixed women not being on a par with Nordic women. And with all of the talk of superiority and Nazi sympathizing.

Can I ask you a question though, I read somewhere in another blog on this site that Noridc white women are supposedly superior to Southern European women. I’m just wondering if you believe that (Monica Bellucci, come on!).

Posted by Daniel on December 16, 2008, 10:55 PM | #

I’m a certified blond-haired, blue-eyed white guy

No, you’re not. You’re a (dyed-blonde, brown-eyed) non-white girl.

This is blatantly obvious to me, and Gender Genie agrees:

Words: 641
(NOTE: The genie works best on texts of more than 500 words.)

Female Score: 898
Male Score: 734

The Gender Genie thinks the author of this passage is: female!

you will never convince anyone who hasn’t already convinced themselves on the matter

So what are you doing here? Who exactly are you trying to convince? Yourself?

LOL, I expected you guys to accuse me of being a Jew, not a chick. “The Gender Genie"- lmfao…

Sorry to disappoint you but I am a guy, and a really white one at that- well, I’m German/Belgian with some Italian in there… so I’m not sure if that means I’m tainted or something.

I’m here cause I’m bored- which is generally why anyone does anything on the internet. I guess what I’m trying to do is let all of you know that you’re not convincing anyone, just trying to spare you the wasted effort

Posted by Daniel on December 17, 2008, 03:42 AM | #

Alright, I’m back and I did some more searching and found even more pics of hot non-white and mixed girls (best search I ever did). Some of them are from my school.

I know a sexy girl when I see one and bullsh*t when I hear it… and I’m calling you on it.

Also, black girls aren’t the monkeys you make them out to be, either. I’m usually not really that into them, but I’d be lying if I said that there wasn’t some really attractive ones out there.

The last one is pure african and she’s not bad-looking at all.

Posted by silver on December 17, 2008, 04:38 AM | #

Hey, you seem like a reasonable guy,

You’re clearly a very perceptive young man (if indeed a young man is what you are). Doubt exists about your identity because picture posters are commonly non-whites attempting to assuage their own anxieties.  It’s certainly a pity that it often comes to this, as the issues raised are more important—and more worthy of being debated—than point-scoring in beauty contests.

but I can’t agree with you that race-mixing only produces an Adriana Lima every one in a blue moon.

Well, it’s an empirical question, isn’t it?  One best answered by empirical methods.  Those are hard to come by when it comes to this sort of thing, but attempts have been made.  femininebeauty.info contains plenty of insight into what makes for the kinds of beauty most of us are moved by—at least when we’re not being manipulated by media creations (Jennifer Lopez a hottie, for example—are they serious?). 

As for sympathizing with White Nationalists- I do on some points. I think that affirmative action is hypocritical and just plain stupid. I’m sick and tired of the NAACP and all of those other bullsh*t organizations- they have long since worn out their purpose. I hate how it’s considered racist if I show any sort of pride in my white heritage (my Biology teacher tried to open a German-language club at my school, but was barred by the administration- that really pissed me off). And I hate the double-standard that allows blacks to say things that they would be publicly shunned for saying if they were white.

That’s really only the tip of it, I’m afraid.  The reason sites such as this exist—rebarbative as they can be at first glance—is a fuller appreciation and understanding of the issues you only touch on above.  One reason racialist boards/blogs can appear more extreme than they really are is that the existence of what is only elsewhere debated (the propriety of affirmative action, the value of diversity, the heritability of intelligence and intelligence’s role in human outcomes, for example) is here taken for granted as having been decisively demonstrated, and the debate consists of measures that might turn around the status quo.

Beyond that, much of what we can broadly call “racialism” actually provides a great deal of insight into the human condition (ie into reality itself), the sort of information that is, by now, routinely suppressed and demonized because it fails to accord with the objectives of multiracialism/multiculturalism (itself a sham deal if there was ever one).  It would behoove anybody who can stomach it to plow through the kinds of issues racialists deal in because a by-product is almost certain to be a greater and more comprehensive understanding of the world we live in, to say nothing of being attracted by racialist political stances themselves.

But this whole movement looses me with the talk of expelling decent, productive non-whites from their homes… and with all the delusional talk of non-white and mixed women not being on a par with Nordic women. And with all of the talk of superiority and Nazi sympathizing.

You’re not wrong to feel that way.  There are various historical reasons for why the above is, or too often seems to be, the case, but it doesn’t have to be that way.  My view is that the issues raised are simply too important to leave to what I suppose you imagine (and not always wrongly) hate-filled “nazi” types.  With respect to race-mixing, it’s simply a question of survival: A race either breeds with its own or it eventually (and sooner than you think) becomes extinct.  That extinction, contrary to what virtually every mainstream organ insists, is not a trivial matter; for many reasons—many of which are discussed here and elsewhere (the archives of amren.com are a goldmine)—it would be momentous, and, properly understood, not to anyone’s benefit, in spite of short-term appearances to the contrary. 

If you are as bored as you claim, why not take some time to familiarize yourself with the material?  Whatever you are (nordic, mixed-white, or even asian or black), true understanding of a phenomenon is always superior to glib media portrayals.  If you’ve made it this far, to where you know there is much that you don’t know, there’s little sense in turning back now.

Posted by Daniel on December 18, 2008, 04:09 AM | #

You’re clearly a very perceptive young man (if indeed a young man is what you are).  Doubt exists about your identity because picture posters are commonly non-whites attempting to assuage their own anxieties.  It’s certainly a pity that it often comes to this, as the issues raised are more important—and more worthy of being debated—than point-scoring in beauty contests.

Rest assured, I’m a (white) guy. I posted pics because I like to back up what I say- and those pics can’t be argued with. You’d have to be gay not to find those girls attractive.

Well, it’s an empirical question, isn’t it?  One best answered by empirical methods.  Those are hard to come by when it comes to this sort of thing, but attempts have been made.  femininebeauty.info contains plenty of insight into what makes for the kinds of beauty most of us are moved by—at least when we’re not being manipulated by media creations (Jennifer Lopez a hottie, for example—are they serious?).

I say again: I have developed a preference for mixed-race women from experience. It doesn’t get much closer to empiricism than that. There are alot of Eurasians and mixed Latinas at my school and I think it’s safe to say that most of them are on the far end of the hotness scale (I’ve posted some pics of them), and I doubt you can attribute that to coincidence, so don’t try. I agree with you about media creations and about Jennifer Lopez (she never did that much for me)- but I’m going to have to call you on that steaming pile of horsesh*t that is femininebeauty.info. It’s even worse than this site. I actually lolled at the “attractive women” section.

In what universe would these women ever be considered hot?

All of the women posted were amateur-nude models, most bland and some even nasty. It seemed like a bad joke.

And I hate how sites such a these never give women of other ethnicities a fair shake, always posting National Geographic-type tribespeople as their best representatives… it’s ridiculous. If you’re going to convince anyone, you’d better try for at least some semblance of objectivity. The site maintains that non-european facial features are “robust” and therefore “masculine.” Although it’s true that finer facial features are more feminine and attractive… I still find the sharp, prominent jawlines, rectangular faces, and undersized lips of alot of the women (touted as “feminine” on the site) to be quite manly. Nice, fulll lips are “robust” but I identify them as one of the tell-tale features of a woman’s face. There was even one blog which tried to convince people that Adriana Lima was masculine (please!). Lima is a freaking goddess, and she definitely blows all of those boring amateur “glamour models” right out of the water.

Lol, am I honestly supposed to prefer those women to these?

I’ll concede that most high-fashion models and even many supermodels are masculine and not terribly attractive. But I find the greater part of the women shown on that site equally unappealing. I agree with the author of the site that there should be more models with faces and figures like Veronica Zemanova, Keeley Hazel, and Crista Nicole; but, aside from that, I think most everything else he says is garbage.

Posted by Daniel on December 18, 2008, 04:10 AM | #

That’s really only the tip of it, I’m afraid.  The reason sites such as this exist—rebarbative as they can be at first glance—is a fuller appreciation and understanding of the issues you only touch on above.  One reason racialist boards/blogs can appear more extreme than they really are is that the existence of what is only elsewhere debated (the propriety of affirmative action, the value of diversity, the heritability of intelligence and intelligence’s role in human outcomes, for example) is here taken for granted as having been decisively demonstrated, and the debate consists of measures that might turn around the status quo.

Beyond that, much of what we can broadly call “racialism” actually provides a great deal of insight into the human condition (ie into reality itself), the sort of information that is, by now, routinely suppressed and demonized because it fails to accord with the objectives of multiracialism/multiculturalism (itself a sham deal if there was ever one).  It would behoove anybody who can stomach it to plow through the kinds of issues racialists deal in because a by-product is almost certain to be a greater and more comprehensive understanding of the world we live in, to say nothing of being attracted by racialist political stances themselves.

You’re not wrong to feel that way.  There are various historical reasons for why the above is, or too often seems to be, the case, but it doesn’t have to be that way.  My view is that the issues raised are simply too important to leave to what I suppose you imagine (and not always wrongly) hate-filled “nazi” types.  With respect to race-mixing, it’s simply a question of survival: A race either breeds with its own or it eventually (and sooner than you think) becomes extinct.  That extinction, contrary to what virtually every mainstream organ insists, is not a trivial matter; for many reasons—many of which are discussed here and elsewhere (the archives of amren.com are a goldmine)—it would be momentous, and, properly understood, not to anyone’s benefit, in spite of short-term appearances to the contrary. 

If you are as bored as you claim, why not take some time to familiarize yourself with the material?  Whatever you are (nordic, mixed-white, or even asian or black), true understanding of a phenomenon is always superior to glib media portrayals.  If you’ve made it this far, to where you know there is much that you don’t know, there’s little sense in turning back now.

In my boredom, I have ventured to look into a several White Nationalist sites. I still go to stormfront.org every now and then for a laugh. I have noticed it usually comes down to white racists and antis vehemently debating eachother’s heavily deluded viewpoints. Their quite different approaches to Ancient Egypt illustrate my point perfectly: white racists hold that it was a thoroughly white civilization ("The mummy of Ramses II has red hair!"), while antis insist that it was black ("Because it’s in Africa...duh!"). Don’t get me wrong, every now and then a voice of reason does chime in, but it is largely ignored. I am aware that there are inherent disparities between the races, that race is by no means a “social construct” (as multiculturalists and race-deniers would have everyone believe). I have looked into the research on IQ, brainsizes, etc… but I still see nothing troubling about sharing a homeland with productive, law-abiding non-whites. Infact, I place just as much value in them as I place in productive, law-abiding whites-- which is more than I ever would in white delinquints, or delinquints of any race for the matter. I do not see the logic behind doing otherwise.

I have since come to the conclusion that, for the most part, it all boils down to culture rather than race. Western culture is superior to all other cultures on the face of this earth because it is conducive to progress. Those who adopt it thrive.

Besides this, I have done some of my own genetic research. It has been proven by the Human Genome Project that the genetic variabiliy among individual humans is far greater than that between the human races. In other words, though it is likely some races may be generally more intelligent than others, there will always be members of the “smarter race” who are less intelligent than their racial norm and members from the “dumber race” who are more intellgent than their racial norm. The consequent messy overlapping renders it impossible to make accurate assumptions about people’s mental capabilities based on race. This FACT is made evident by the legions of blacks and hispanics (usually considered by most racialists as being of a less intelligent stock) who achieve a higher education and who excel at their (more prestigious) professions. It annoys the sh*t out of me when racialists point to generalizations and disregard the (quite substantial) exceptions… just as much as it annoys the sh*t out of me when antis point to I will procrethe exceptions to undermine what is generally true.

I will procreate with a girl that I love, with whose genes I want combined with mine and passed on to my children. Ultimately, I view people as individuals rather than as spokes in a racial wheel, so race will not be an issue. I feel in no way obligated to take a white girl for a wife, if that’s what your trying to get at.

I’ve said my peace… I’m off to go and look into the site archives that you suggest.

Posted by Janice Ma on July 29, 2009, 06:49 AM | #

It is amazing some of the comments one finds here.  Some of these are well written and scholarly.  Others show a lot of hate, bitterness, and a twisted viewpoint toward their fellow humans.  To point to certain features on people and describe these as grotesque or malformed, whatever, just shows such a meanness of spirit.  It shows you’re not truly interested in any kind of scientific discourse on the subject.  You just want to kick a few people around.  So why don’t you stop bothering the rest of us--and leave.

Secondly--do you really think that white women was THAT pretty?  I thought she was rather large and certain features were rather masculine.  Is that YOUR IDEAL?  If it is, all I can say is, well, everyone has their own ideal of what is the prettiest.  They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  Also there are a lot of features on white people that one could pick on if one truly wished to.  Things like blotchy pale skin, bumpiness and unevenness about their features and bodies....does anyone really wish me to continue this?  This is just ridiculous!

Now, myself, I’ve always recognized a very wide range of beauty. I am honestly & naturally broad minded enough that there are many types that I find very good looking.  The type I prefer is the Eurasian but that is easily explained.  My kids are half Chinese.  But the woman that I think are the best looking in the country are the mixed white/black women such as the oldest daughter of the family in the sitcom The Fresh Prince of BelAir. Is there anyone out there who would truly deny that she’s gorgeous?  Angelina Jolie is part Native American. Is there anyone who doesn’t think that she’s beautiful?  Mixing generally softens features, particularly in women and this softening makes them more attractive to the male.  Haven’t some of you men ever learned anything?

Myself I am from a family that has always married out.  I am Native American, from 2 lines, English, Welsh, German, Scots and Jewish.  Needless to say, no one in my family has ever for many generations resembled any of their siblings.  My husband is Chinese.  My (soon to be ex--thank god) son-in-law is Dutch (science researcher).  His brother is married to a Chinese girl.  His uncle is married to a Chinese girl.  I have a Japanese nephew-in-law and a half Japanese, half Chinese great niece, black cousins and Mexican cousins. 

In the medical and scientific community that many of these people and our relatives live in, I have seen SO many mixtures.  If you’re trying to stop it, it’s a losing battle--especially with asians and whites.  Chinese fit in with white culture so easily.  There’s not really that much difference.  It adds a few fun decorative holidays.  What religion they do have is very unobtrusive.  They’ll even add yours if you want.  And then come the babies.  Eurasian babies are almost every time adorable.  The parents would have to be very UGLY (unsymmetrical ) and even then they’d still probably be better looking than the parents.  Don’t forget; Chinese have, on the average smoother skin than white people (smaller pores), prettier, more elegant looking hands.  So do blacks. Chinese are skinnier, smaller boned and have smaller feet.
About my kids and granddaughters.  My daughters schools never permitted skipping grades so grades 1-11 she acted as unofficial teacher’s assistant. Her 12th year she went to college, received her B.S. in Bio-physics at 19, her Ph.D. in
Bio-Physics at 23, her MD (Radiology) & did a post doc in EE by 26.  She began reading at age 2. She could sing, act, paint, draw, everything but there was only one her so figuring medicine was quite lucrative and stable she became a doctor.  She’s also gorgeous, 45 but looks like she’s 30, still gets carded and she’s healthy.  Her daughters are both gorgeous, smart and healthy.  The youngest has blond hair, pale golden Chinese skin, regal, she looks like a viking queen.  People have been staring at her since she was 10.

So do I believe in hybrid vigor? Ha!  Of course!  I live it!  And thanks to my daughters hefty income, I live it quite well!  And that’s just another thing that hybrid vigor can do for you!  So good!!!

Posted by Jonathan on August 17, 2009, 06:01 AM | #

That “white” girl in the original post isn’t even full white...HAHAHAHAHAHA

Jessica doesn’t like you using her picture either.

Posted by miscegenation on November 21, 2009, 04:44 PM | #

I totally agree with Daniel. We’ve seen all sort of supremacists here: white, black, asian, references to jewish supremacism… and all I can do is to give the finger to all such people.

but one point has been left out for the entire thread: if all those people have their way, what happens to individual freedom? The freedom to procreate with who we want, and to associate with who we want? Is the preservation of this nebulous thing called ‘white genes’ really worth restricting our own freedom for? Turn down people we feel love and attraction towards? Are we people, or are we breeding stock, who form relationships purely to make sure their children have the ‘right’ characteristics?

If white/jewish/muslim/indian/black nationalists really want to further their own race, they should go and have 10-15 children like people in poor countries, instead of getting upset by people who love freedom to cross racial boundaries.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on November 21, 2009, 05:35 PM | #

”I totally agree with Daniel.  We’ve seen all sort of supremacists here:  white, black, asian, references to jewish supremacism… and all I can do is to give the finger to all such people.  But one point has been left out of the entire thread:  if all those people have their way, what happens to individual freedom?  The freedom to procreate with who we want and to associate with who we want?” (—“Miscegenation”)

In the post-Jewish set-up to come, you’ll retain the right to do all that in Soweto, Durban, Port Moresby, Guinea-Bissau, and …. wait, what have I left out? …… oh yes, Brazil!  Almost forgot Ashley Montagu’s favorite country (his favorite in second place that is, after his first-place favorite, the National Socialist apartheid state of Israel).

”Is the preservation of this nebulous thing called ‘white genes’ really worth restricting our own freedom for?”

White genes “nebulous”?  I’m afraid they’re very real and well defined.  What’s more, science only makes them realer and better defined with each passing month.  Looks like you’ve got some catching up to do.  Science is leaving you further and further behind.

”Turn down people we feel love and attraction towards?”

No, don’t do that.  Marry them but in Soweto.  (Then either stay in Soweto permanently or set up house, you and she together, in Port Moresby.) See?  You can still have it all!  (You just can’t have it all here — you’ll have to go to certain other places for some of it.  Sorry.  Oh and you’ll have to stay there.  But you can have it all, definitely!)

”Are we people, or are we breeding stock?”

People and it was precisely people’s wish not to have open borders and the whole race-replacement régime shoved down their throats that was overridden by the overlords.

We’re not concerned so much with individuals who desire to have mulatto children (actually, we’re not at all concerned with individuals per se, individuals as individuals) but mainly with whole races:  we don’t want government-enforced race-replacement.  The people have a right not to be race-replaced.  The people are right to question what the overlords are doing to them.

”If white/jewish/muslim/indian/black nationalists really want to further their own race, they should go and have 10-15 children like people in poor countries, instead of getting upset by people who love freedom to cross racial boundaries.”

Just as your freedom to throw a punch ends where my nose begins, your freedom to cross racial boundaries ends where your genocide of my race begins. 

Put that in your “freedom to cross racial boundaries” pipe and smoke it.

Posted by miscegenation on November 23, 2009, 02:29 AM | #

In the post-Jewish set-up to come, you’ll retain the right to do all that in Soweto, Durban, Port Moresby, Guinea-Bissau, and …. wait, what have I left out? …… oh yes, Brazil!  Almost forgot Ashley Montagu’s favorite country (his favorite in second place that is, after his first-place favorite, the National Socialist apartheid state of Israel).

there won’t be such a thing. Just like there won’t be a Communist Utopia. People won’t willingly abandon their rights for a principle that to most means very very little indeed. Some would, but most would not. That’s not how a human mind works. On top of that, most regimes that attempt to control people’s s sexuality eventually fail. And in the age of the Internet and of freedom of information, such a society would be even more doomed to failure than before.

In any case, you are the one with the problem, you move if you don’t like me miscegenating.

White genes “nebulous”?  I’m afraid they’re very real and well defined.  What’s more, science only makes them realer and better defined with each passing month.  Looks like you’ve got some catching up to do.  Science is leaving you further and further behind.

they are nebulous in that they mean little to us in day-to-day lives. And by ‘us’ I mean the average Joe on the street: clearly they mean lots to you. But you are outweighed by people like me, who will defend human rights against anything. And yes, this includes White human rights as well.

No, don’t do that.  Marry them but in Soweto.  (Then either stay in Soweto permanently or set up house, you and she together, in Port Moresby.) See?  You can still have it all!  (You just can’t have it all here — you’ll have to go to certain other places for some of it.  Sorry.  Oh and you’ll have to stay there.  But you can have it all, definitely!)

Isn’t this what uncle Joseph Stalin was so fond of? Deporting people and exiling people? Nice example you have there!

People and it was precisely people’s wish not to have open borders and the whole race-replacement régime shoved down their throats that was overridden by the overlords.

We’re not concerned so much with individuals who desire to have mulatto children (actually, we’re not at all concerned with individuals per se, individuals as individuals) but mainly with whole races:  we don’t want government-enforced race-replacement.  The people have a right not to be race-replaced.  The people are right to question what the overlords are doing to them.

ah, this is exactly where the USSR failed! They thought they could treat people as a herd, act in terms of ‘common good’, sacrifice the few ‘for the good of many’. It really doesn’t work like this. People are not a herd, they are individuals, with feelings, and opinions, and rights, and you cannot just force segregation on them in this way.

You cannot reduce people to breeding-stock, to mere carriers of genes. People have far far too much pride for that.

Just as your freedom to throw a punch ends where my nose begins, your freedom to cross racial boundaries ends where your genocide of my race begins.

Put that in your “freedom to cross racial boundaries” pipe and smoke it.

ooh, I can argue like this too. Your freedom to have segregation ends where the interference in my personal life begins. Sorry.

but you didn’t address my point. Why are the 10% of whites who miscegenate a problem for you and the 90% of whites who do not have enough children to keep your race above replacement levels not a problem? If you have a problem, don’t attack others, DO something about it YOURSELF. Go and find a white girl and make 50 babies! But leave me and my freedom alone, mmmkay?