Prostitute Pricing

At a local bordello, actually two bordellos right next to one another, there are a variety of prostitutes on offer, about 40 all in all. One is a tall, blue-eyed Nordic blonde. She sits on the second floor and costs 200 Euro per hour. She doesn’t offer penetration though, just a very erotic massage. Above her on the fifth floor there are black African prostitutes. They offer “everything”, at a price of 20 Euro per hour. The blonde is making 10 times as much per hour as the black Africans do , although they work in the same establishment- and she is not even offering sex! Institutional racism has penetrated even the most profane of places, the bordello. Will the legacy of slavery never end? Excuse me, gentlemen, I have to go read Catullus.

Posted by Potential Frolic on Monday, July 23, 2007 at 08:26 AM in
Comments (22) | Tell-a-Friend

The trackback URL for this entry is: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry

Trackbacks:

No trackbacks yet.

Comments:

Page 1 of 1 pages


I assume you are in Europe?  In a country with legalized prostitution? 

So, what you are saying is that men would rather pay 200 Euro/hr to get a clean and safe handjob from a blonde rather than pay 20 Euro/hr to get AIDS from some ugly disease-ridden black African whore.

Seems to make sense.

Who in their right mind, even with aesthetics aside, would want to have intercourse with a black African prostitute?  Do you have so much confidence in that condom?

Posted by Onan the Barbarian on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 10:27 AM | #


PF,

Keep your Eyes on the Prize.

Posted by Scimitar on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 12:37 PM | #


“Onan the Barbarian”, you miss a very simple point, why would a John pay 200€ for a hand job when he can get one for 20€?  Do you think, “aesthetics aside” the black African prostitute would turn down his 20€ because she was insulted that he didn’t want to have intercourse with her?

Posted by James Bowery on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 02:28 PM | #


Mr. Bowery, maybe I did not word the comment properly, or you are not understanding properly, or both.  I am not saying that the price differential is independent of aesthetics.  I am saying that the probability that a sub-Saharan African whore is infected with some sort of dangerous disease is such that no one in their right mind would want to have intercourse with “her”, independent of aesthetics, price, or even use of a condom.  Actually, no one in their right mind should have intercourse with any whore of any race, but an African is really the extreme of the infectious possibilities - although a South Asian would likely be right up there.

Certainly, the difference in price for a handjob (putting 20 Euro as the upper limit for Negress services of any kind) is indicative of aesthetic preference.  It is obviously worth, to customers of this bordello, 180 Euro to get jacked off by the blonde rather than by a Negress. One assumes, with the caveat below, that this is due to the greater pleasure derived from being penilely manipulated by an attractive female rather than by what passes for a sub-Saharan “woman.”

Of course, a person sensitive to disease possibilities, including serious skin disorders - of which coloreds are in no short supply - may indeed wonder whether even a handjob is safe from an African prostitute, although the use of latex gloves may ease worries sufficiently enough to make the price differential attractive.  That is, appearance aside.

Whether or not discussing bordello preferences and handjobs is an issue of world historical importance is another matter.  But this is, after all, “Majority Rights”, so it is “par for the course.”

Posted by Onan the Barbarian on Tuesday, July 24, 2007 at 10:56 PM | #


White men don’t fancy negresses much. This is one reason why the Duke U frame-up smelt so bad: white gang rapes of black women are vanishingly rare compared with the other way round. (This also gives the lie to the vapid feminist cliche that rape is “about power, not sex”.)

Moreover, the reductions in estimated white admixture in American-Americans from previous guesstimates that DNA analysis has suggested correlate with the findings of social historians.

Contrary to abolitionist propaganda, there was not a great deal of forced mating of white plantation owners and slaves; and in emancipation cities such as Chicago and St Louis brothels were voluntarily but entirely segregated. In a free market, white customers preferred to pay more for white whores. How much has changed since the Gilded Age?

The skews in interracial dating and mating patterns correlate, as Steve Sailer has argued, with IQ-assortation (smart bonks smart) and with perceptions of the degree of feminine or masculine qualities each race typically exhibits. See his classic “Is Love Colorblind?”:

http://www.isteve.com/IsLoveColorblind.htm

with update here:

http://isteve.blogspot.com/2005/08/is-love-colorblind.html

For all the desegregation and diversity chatter, Americans (not least liberal bien pensants) are still rather reluctant to mate outside their race, no matter how dutifully they tell pollsters it’s cool:

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/interracial_marriage.htm

Looks as if white flight is a “problem” in the boudoir as well as the burb.

PS: Frank Harris, that tireless conqueror of the ladies, wrote in his memoirs that the smell of black women put him off them.

Posted by Amalek on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 10:51 AM | #


Should be “African-Americans” in para 2 above. Bonus dormitat Homerus.

Posted by Amalek on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 10:56 AM | #


Amalek has a good point above. I have argued the issue many times elsewhere on other venues. Simply put, the blackest of blacks in America are those who live in the rural Deep South, as anyone actually from the region well knows. Their ancestors never left for the big cities of the North and have been inbreeding in remote isolated areas for generations. The lightest blacks tend to be those in the cities.

Miscegenation was always far more common in the cities than it was in the countryside. In the South, New Orleans and Charleston come immediately to mind. New Orleans even developed a Latin America style racial caste system with coloreds lording over blacks. Ray Nagin, whom we all remember from Katrina, would be a good example of a creole.

The reality of miscegenation in this country will surprise most people who, as Amalek notes above, have imbibed abolitionist propaganda in their youth. Much of the white gene flow into the black population happened through intermarriage between black men and white females (which is why the anti-miscegenation laws were passed in the first place). On the plantations, white trash overseers were usually the rapists, not masters. The wealthiest masters with the most slaves often did not even reside there. Finally, I would not be the least surprised if the majority of it took place in Northern cities between black laborers from the South and uprooted European immigrants.

Posted by Scimitar on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 11:55 AM | #


regarding Onan The Barbarian:

But this is, after all, “Majority Rights”, so it is “par for the course.”

Please post a link to a forum with a higher standard of discussion than MajorityRights, so I can go there, but I promise, I will not post to it, so it will remain unstained.
This article is actually the lower-limit for Majority Rights, not “par for the course”. I assume you know that, and just want to appear superior because you love the role of a critic who wields sharp words and then disappears, himself untouchable.
The rest of your comments were all either questions which answer themselves with a moments thought or the obvious between-the-lines thinking already contained in my post above.

Amalek at least was able to muster enough thought to say something interesting:

Looks as if white flight is a “problem” in the boudoir as well as the burb.

Its true, and its true in Europe as well. Most prostitutes are from Eastern Europe or Asia/Africa, at least in these two bordellos. Thats why finding a Dutch prostitute in the Netherlands is not so simple as you would think!

PS: Frank Harris, that tireless conqueror of the ladies, wrote in his memoirs that the smell of black women put him off them.

I had a work acquaintence who said he broke up with a black girlfriend only because of the smell. He said everything else about her was really cool! He meant it, as well, it seemed. She was a nice person, etc. Only the smell he couldn’t stand, while they were sleeping next to each other.

Posted by PF on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 01:45 PM | #


No, PF, the fact that “Majority Rights” is the “most high brow” of the “low brow” doesn’t make right posts about bordellos and the rest of the “par for the course” material here.

Posted by Onan the critic on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 03:02 PM | #


“This article is actually the lower-limit for Majority Rights, not “par for the course”.

It doesn’t contain actual porno pictures, so I wouldn’t say it is the “lower-limit.” Right about the median, it would seem.

“I assume you know that, and just want to appear superior...”

Far from it.  Those of us who are not “creative geniuses” can only gape in awe at the contributions made here.  One can only offer the most humble of constructive criticism.

“because you love the role of a critic who wields sharp words and then disappears, himself untouchable.”

I made a comment, which you critiqued, or attempted to critique.  How that equates to being “untouchable” escapes me.

“The rest of your comments were all either questions which answer themselves with a moments thought...”

Appropriate, because your post illuminates nothing that we do not already know.

“...or the obvious between-the-lines thinking already contained in my post above. “

Emphasis on “obvious.”

How about a unified field theory for MR: the moon landings were faked, and actually filmed in a bordello.  Erotic massages in this bordello take place in the paper mache “lunar module”; prices are based upon craniometrics and breast-to-hip ratios.  The bordello is, of course, a traditonal conservative establishment, although no one knows precisely what “traditional conservatism” means.

Posted by Onan Onan on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 03:27 PM | #


Onan the Critic wrote:

No, PF, the fact that “Majority Rights” is the “most high brow” of the “low brow” doesn’t make right posts about bordellos and the rest of the “par for the course” material here.

Are you saying MR is the most high brow discussion site for WN issues? Why do you say “the most high brow” of the “low brow”? Are all WN/Right sites low brow?

If you find posts about bordellos offensive, OK, but the blog itself is generally pretty clean, GW keeps it that way. I find the contempt in your tone unwarranted, as this is in my opinion one of the best blogs on the internet. And I find it hard to imagine you really are offended by the mentioning of a bordello. If so, you have pretty conservative tastes. It seems more likely that you are stuck in your position of critic, and have to say the first thing that comes to your mind, attacking whatever weakness is visible in each post. But if we are serving the best burgers in town, why not eat them without complaining?

Posted by PF on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 03:35 PM | #


“But if we are serving the best burgers in town, why not eat them without complaining?”

That’s a good catchphrase for the next time your local burger joint serves up some E. Coli-tainted meat.

Posted by Onan on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 04:21 PM | #


Abraham_Spencer_glovebox.jpg
Before deciding to patronize the establishment, Spencer Abraham personally inspects the apparatus the African prostitutes must use while giving hand-jobs

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 04:23 PM | #


Onan essentially wants an academic journal blog where every post and every single comment contains new insights of theory or application.

This has been the basis of his whine for years and years, though blogspot would require only an hour and a stand-alone site perhaps a few weekends of work.

Posted by See Onan talk. Talk Onan talk. on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 04:23 PM | #


Actually, the topic of this blog entry is extremely important.

One of the most active topics on MR has been the evolution of beauty and the recurring problem is how to obtain an objective measure of beauty.  I suggested before in one of those threads that the only real objective measure we can come up with is the price paid for prostitutes.

The topic of beauty is important because beauty is one of the things that makes life worth living, and if there is reason to believe there is a race that is producing more beauty than other races, that, alone is good enough a reason to preserve it.

PS: Prices paid for actresses don’t make the grade because of the propaganda value of mass media.

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 04:51 PM | #


“Prices paid for actresses don’t make the grade because of the propaganda value of mass media.” (—James B.)

But the Jewish academics will say the same thing about prices commanded by prostitutes, that they are “socially conditioned by an institutionally-racist society-at-large” (translation:  I’m Jewish not Euro-Christian, therefore I’m intensely jealous of the position you Euro-Christians have achieved for yourselves in the society we share in common, and so as an academic I’m going to join my fellow Jewish academics in coming up with whatever academic-sounding sophistries-posing-as-actual-aguments will fool the astoundingly stupid goys and help knock you Euro-Christians off your ethnically exclusive perch from which I as a Jew feel excluded and from which you look down on non-whites in a way that enrages me as a Jew since I’m jealous and have no intention of “looking up to you on your pedestal.” When it’s my turn, as a Jew, to lord it over the Palestinians (and maybe over you guys too, eventually, if we play our cards right ...), I’ll of course apply totally different standards to the situation and I’ll thank you and everyone else to desist from making remarks sympathetic to the Palestinian cattle in an effort to knock Jews off their perch exactly as they’re making the present effort to knock you off yours, couching it in humanitarian-boilerplate language).

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 05:15 PM | #


Fred Scrooby wrote:

so as an academic I’m going to join my fellow Jewish academics in coming up with whatever academic-sounding sophistries-posing-as-actual-aguments will fool the astoundingly stupid goys and help knock you Euro-Christians off your ethnically exclusive perch from which I as a Jew feel excluded and from which you look down on non-whites in a way that enrages me as a Jew since I’m jealous and have no intention of “looking up to you on your pedestal.”

The riddle of the 20th century, in a single sentence.

Posted by PF on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 05:37 PM | #


Or maybe in riddle form it would look like this:

“I am you when I want to be, but when I don’t want to be, I’m not. I found a bunch of reasons why you should go against your instincts, but to me they don’t apply. I’m only half-conscious that I exist, when I argue; but when I learn that I exist, I realize all along that I knew what I was. I need you, but more importantly, I need you to not love yourself enough to realize you don’t need me. If you say I exist, I say: How dare you notice that? What on earth am I?”

Posted by PF on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 05:45 PM | #


BECAUSE I’M WORTH IT

The slow-handclapping started in the £600 seats. Not, of course at having been made to pay so much for what, after all, was a mere concert, or at the sheer greed which meant they were asked for an extra £25 for a shoddy programme. No, the slow-handclapping was because Barbra Streisand was late, albeit just half an hour late. They really should try waiting for Pete Doherty one very long evening ...

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, July 25, 2007 at 06:35 PM | #


Onan. Why don’t you put your “supreme genius intellect” on the table for all to see.

To GW: It would be approriate to let one person comment with one username, to reduce the number of these onanizers etc.

Posted by a Finn on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 12:12 PM | #


Onan seems to be labouring under the delusion that we operate the same hypocritical pseudo-free speech policy as the liberal establishment, we don’t, this is a meeting place for like minded individuals to discuss the ideas we are interested in, if you aren’t one of us, piss off, or expect to be ignored.

Posted by calvin on Thursday, July 26, 2007 at 09:48 PM | #


If I inadvertently gave Onan a boner, I humbly apologise.

Posted by Amalek on Wednesday, August 1, 2007 at 01:55 PM | #

Page 1 of 1 pages

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required; will not be displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

# MR's comment software uses session-timing, and may destroy your comment if your browser window
has been left open too long. It's best to copy your comment and refresh the page before submitting it.
# You must prefix http://www.anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links;
For example http://www.anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Enter the word you see below to submit your comment; you do not need to enter it in order to preview your comment.

captcha shown here

image of the day

Most Recent Comments

John commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 10:58 AM. (#)

barbiplease commented in entry 'Why "The Political Compass" Is Inherently Vectorist and How to Correct It' on 11/19/08, 10:35 AM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 04:07 AM. (#)

Meandering commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 03:28 AM. (#)

Tania commented in entry 'Maggots feeding on the body of art' on 11/19/08, 03:10 AM. (#)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 01:33 AM. (#)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 01:02 AM. (#)

danielj commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:53 AM. (#)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:42 AM. (#)

Guest commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:31 AM. (#)

Thunder commented in entry '"race war" From Google Trends' on 11/19/08, 12:10 AM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/19/08, 12:08 AM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 11:05 PM. (#)

Jean West commented in entry 'American Secessionist Convention' on 11/18/08, 11:04 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 10:02 PM. (#)

Captainchaos commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 09:53 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 09:14 PM. (#)

Svyatoslav Igorevich commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 09:10 PM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 08:53 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'Jonathan Bowden on Marxism and the Frankfurt School' on 11/18/08, 08:06 PM. (#)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 08:05 PM. (#)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 07:17 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 06:32 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 06:12 PM. (#)

a Finn commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 05:40 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 05:29 PM. (#)

James Bowery commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 05:07 PM. (#)

silver commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 04:38 PM. (#)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 03:27 PM. (#)

Fred Scrooby commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 03:26 PM. (#)

silver commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 03:04 PM. (#)

Fred Scrooby commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 02:52 PM. (#)

Dave Johns commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 01:57 PM. (#)

silver commented in entry 'What WN wants from Obama and what the SPLC wants are not the same' on 11/18/08, 01:34 PM. (#)

jenny commented in entry 'Bethlehem by Liverpool and Gravesend' on 11/18/08, 01:16 PM. (#)

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

EGI

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa