REVOLUTION AND RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY

What X-Ray Vision is neglecting, and which is just as important as “the survival of Euro genes,” is the survival of top-to-bottom-Euro communities (and nations, just the union of all a group’s communities).  Primary among our demands is that those not disappear or change.  We demand that.  Those don’t exist in Latin America for example, and are what is being attacked first and foremost with this first stage of race-replacement we’re being subjected to.  There’s also the fact that, as JW Holliday showed in his log entries at this site, people who look Euro among the Latin-American élites are mixed for the most part.

What X-Ray Vision is neglecting, and which is just as important as “the survival of Euro genes,” is the survival of top-to-bottom-Euro communities (and nations, just the union of all a group’s communities).  - F Scrooby.

I am merely an observer of events. This is how I see things panning out in the future. That is how the future looks unless revolution comes or someone picks up agains on Tom Metzger’s Leaderless Resistance and William Luther Pierce’ day of resistance. Unfortunately all prior efforts for revolution have been feeble compared to peers.

Pierce probably inspired Bob Matthews in the same way Combat-18 inspired David Copeland to set-off bombs in London targeted at Gays, South Asians and Blacks - nail bombs. I am told Copeland picked his designs from Goodies Here - no incitement intended - don’t open this link in a public library people!

Bob Matthews went nowhere with bank robberies and died in a shoot-out. Copeland is in a British prison. His attempts were shoddy and pale compared to the many Islamist groups that are plotting to blow up Londonistan.  Likewise the IRA was so successful at blowing up buildings that even the elite British forces like the SAS failed to curtail it. In a way you could say the IRA won the war since it forced the hand of Anthony Charles Lytton Blair to concede defeat and hand over Northern Ireland to to the Irish Republic - that is effectively what he did - Rev Ian Paisley will be dead soon and the Republicans will be a majority - Ireland Forever!!!!

On MR I see the same approach that Duke crafted which is approach is education and awareness with the hope to produce a political platform and finally social change. All this was conceived by David Duke after the first the charm offensive of People Friendly Klanmen failed. He dumped burning crosses for suits. He also came up with the protocol on WN non-violence - kind of like Martin Luther King - no insults and get smart.

At the risk of being seen to endorsing violence I think the IRA strategy was more effective. The WN community may have Internet but I think the foe is more cunning and honed in getting its message across. Add to this the slaughter of WWII that Liberals use to extract guilt. At Judicial Inc they say it is not really Liberals but The Hidden Generals Wearing Skullcaps. I have talked to many as why they never vote for far right parties - no one wants to be labelled a racist or bigot or be compared to Hitler. In other words your foe has done a thorough job of conditioning. Self-defence = racism. These are the same people who claim the hospital are congested and crime is too ethnic. I have looked at all European parties that align to WN and all seem to be mediocre except a few like the National Front in France, Konstantin’s NPD in Eastern Germany and Vlaams Belang in Belgium - mind you even Sien Fienn in NI was a small party even now. I doubt the BNP will ever come into power in Britain - rather it merely seems to force agendas like immigration on the mainstream then sink into oblivion.

In conclusion I think arms, sometimes do produce results. It is said that in Rhodesia Smith knew the jig was up when the black rebels downed two aircraft in less than one year with Strela-2 SAMs - they didn’t just threw rocks those blacks. They also attacked an oil depot right in the middle of Salisbury/Harare the capital. Even De Klerk gave up in South West Africa/Namibia rather than be bogged down in more bloodletting even though on average for each South African soldier dead there were 25 on the other side thanks to wonder weapons like the GV-5 Howtizers. Then again white are out numbered by a like margin in the sub-region.

White Nationalists like F. Scrooby have bills to pay, mortgages to services etc and don’t want the Bobby SandysHotel Hilton treatment Sandys - what a very unIrish sounding name.

My observation is the racialists and White Nationalists lack both the commitment, stomach and sacrifice for Robert Reis or Willaim Pierce’s revolution. In other words Bobby Sandys and Islamists of London are willing to give their all while people here wait for Critical Mass then Nick T. will get tosh napalm at the blacks like in Nam - by which time he might be too old and massively outnumbered.

X-Ray Vision.

X-Ray suffers from a variant of Lewontin’s Fallacy.  Just as Lewontin focused on single genes as determinative of race, so X-Ray focuses on single phenotypes as determinative of race.

The reality is that there is an entire human ecology at stake—the correlation structure of genes and phenotypes within a population and indeed within a territory comprising said human ecology.  If he wants us to “mix it up” for the sake of evolution or creativity or something, he can have it—all in good time—as allowed by the gene flow rates prudence dictates be limited in order to limit the risk that vital heritage is lost without compensating gain.  Investors call this “portfolio management”.

Secondly, the argument that there is “no stomach” for forceful resistance is more reminiscent of the rhetoric about “cowardly terrorists” than it is any supportive argument against armed resistance.  Individual men confronting a nuclear armed Big Brother state’s standing army is not heroism unless there is some higher purpose served by their resulting sexual torture at the hands of ethnic prison gangs—or his suicide attack against the representatives of that state sent to apprehend him.  There are techniques made viable by modern technology such as I have discussed in the past:  “Act at noon Central Time on April 15 and April 19.  If you spread this message, do not act.  If you act, bear in mind the goal:  Independence.” Essentially, the problem for Leviathan is the capital cost of its critical organs is driven by peak load limits.  Such techniques become more viable the more the People, mainly its young men, recognize the horror of what is being done to them.

At the risk of being seen to endorsing violence I think the IRA strategy was more effective. The WN community may have Internet but I think the foe is more cunning and honed in getting its message across.

The IRA (and their Protestant adversaries) had communities in both rural and urban Northern Ireland that were willing to assist them and shield them from the authorities. Attempts to pursue IRA gunmen were blocked by rioting civilians allowing for escape.  Collaborators were ruthlessly dealt with and in time locals did not see it as their civil duty to co-operate with the state. Even when they didn’t have much support appeals to common history with ever present symbols of nationhood produced a visceral reaction from the local civilians. Also all the Ulster paramilitaries were involved in organised crime. Such activity provided them with money, property, as well as the support of apolitical criminals looking to make money or become big shots.  Can WNists claim to have any of this going for them?

Lastly, previous Republican rebellions were easily snuffed out by the Northern Ireland state authorities. These state authorities were made up of local Protestants who treated their conflict with Catholics as an existential one. The interfering British government did not see it that way. Appeasing Americans - both the Irish lobby and the Cold Warriors upset at the propaganda opportunity for the Soviet-bloc - was more important to them than crushing the Republicans.  In the US many police and other state employees may be whites who are not PC leftists but how much would they sympathise with WNists who got violent? At present they’d see it as their civil duty put down a WNist version of the IRA. (That’s not to say things can’t change). I would not expect the US authorities to be as weak dealing with WNist violence as the British were during the Troubles.

White Nationalists like F. Scrooby have bills to pay, mortgages to services etc and don’t want the Bobby SandysHotel Hilton treatment Sandys - what a very unIrish sounding name.

“We’ll never forget you, Billy Sands” as the graffiti once said. His name was Bobby Sands.

“The reality is that there is an entire human ecology at stake — the correlation structure of genes and phenotypes within a population and indeed within a territory comprising said human ecology.” (—James B.)

This of course is exactly what I meant in my comment, where I referred to “communities and nations that are top-to-bottom Euro.” We will never settle for anything less than a return to that, exactly what we had in Europe, certainly, before forced race-replacement, and for the most part in the U.S. as well.  The other side needs to understand the following:  1) we are perfectly aware of what they’re up to:  they’re fooling many but not all, and fewer and fewer with each passing year, month, week, day, and hour — our ranks are growing geometrically; 2) we will not compromise on this question or accept any “new racial status quo” for our communities and nations; 3) we are totally committed to a return to the racial/ethnocultural status quo ante; 4) we are extremely serious.

X-Ray Vision said:

My observation is the racialists and White Nationalists lack both the commitment, stomach and sacrifice for Robert Reis or Willaim Pierce’s revolution. In other words Bobby Sandys and Islamists of London are willing to give their all while people here wait for Critical Mass then Nick T. will get tosh napalm at the blacks like in Nam - by which time he might be too old and massively outnumbered.

I disagree. White sentiment will only turn anti-foreigner in sufficient mass when economic resources turn scarce, which means we have to wait until this economic set-up starts to sputter and fall apart, before our ideas can truly find circulation. All attempts to preempt change that are outside of the realm of peaceful organizing and discussion are going to initiate a backlash which will be scrupelless, opportunistic and more conspirative than anything WNs can conjure: naturally it will have the benefit of being organized from society’s highest tiers, whereas our situation could not be more bottom-up. Each of us could probably name 1 billionaire willing to contribute to their counterrevolution- now name 1 who would contribute to ours.

The Neocons only needed Russia and Islam to totally change many aspects of American politics, foreign policy especially. A WN-insurgency is precisely what this power structure needs to begin unfolding the same politics domestically. It will give its flailing gasping structure a boogey-man to oppose: in the declining years of these governments this could be precisely the prop they need: a secret WN conspiracy. A coalition of liberal kids and colored people would ascent to the use of totalitarian methods in the suppression of this ultimate evil. Don’t give it to them, I say.

I am [BLACK]. Very interesting this MR is.

Well, X-Ray Vision, if your so interested in MR, donations of $500 or $1,000 would be greatly appreciated. - Tommy G

I think you give Blecks too much credit. I doubt that in between robbing liquor stores, gin and juice they would have time to sit down and analyse WN and the dynamics of race unfolding. Maybe you watch too much TV where Blecks are numbered among the scientists, hackers and financial wizards.

As far as I can see most of your gripes are caused by White Liberals or as Prof. MacDonald says the 1965 Holocaust engineered by the Kosher Semites posing as Euros. Perhaps Yanks understand why the world’s favourite Semites were quarantined in the Old World?

About the money I am trying to make some first so that request is on hold but again that would render me subjective and make my book hard to sell - the pitch is neutrality - maybe if I make a bundle I will go to the North Pole - Russia just made a claim.

I’m not a White Nationalist. I’m an ordinary completely apolitical normal person concerned about what’s going on around me.  I know nothing about White Nationalism.

F. Scrooby that is what I meant by saying no one wants to be identified as a WN = bigot = racist = Redneck = Hitler Nut - the other team has conditioned people to think like this. So in your mind White Nationalists are not normal? Actually WL Pierce and R. Oliver were very intelligent and rational if you ask me but were not so much for the love of the Blecks. I brought up the IRA/Islamist to provoke you guys to give me some answers.

By the way Fred I think you could be more comfortable at Amren - they also feign being seen as extremists. In fact the most hardcore at Amren are not the East European Jews who say they are White Christians but a couple of Southerners. Personally I think Amren is just another version of Daniel Pipes - they only difference is on Blecks/Los Amigos.

I think PF has been the most sensible of all the above output - not philosophical and not shallow either. He seems to agree with the anti-Zionists are Judicial Inc - no doubt the economic fundamentals will first give way before William Luther Pierce’s Day of Revolution can come about. Technically Pax Americana is broke and Iraqi and all those imperial adventures are being paid for by the Chinese. The sub-prime lending fiasco is but a symptom of worse to come.  The rot starts with the economic fundamentals.

The UK is even in worse shape. I think British readers know the Limey Bosses became broke in the 1970s and 1980s - the UK like Ireland is propped up by FDI flows mostly from the Chinese via the US. London is symptomatic - low taxes attract the super rich including some rich Swedes, Russians and Indians. These bring monopoly money that has propped up property prices - but for how long? Some of this cash is in the many London Hedge Funds - a thousand ways to make money. Meanwhile as the quality of life declines London might face some serious competition as a financial centre from Dublin, Edinburgh etc. It is a matter of time before the UK unravels economically beginning with Londonistan - then the cutbacks in social spending will be ignite revolution as the various groups compete. Gordon ‘Sweatie’ Brown and McBlair know this financial problem is looming and the UK has been running trade deficits second to Pax Americana. Hence they are courting Arab money like David Duke - London as an Islamic Financial Centre is the latest scheme.

Anyway I get most of my economic outlooks from Jim Puplvava at Financial Sense. Jim and his guests have been accurate. He does not do politics though but uses subtle language on the coming collapse and the Neocon follies. One guest was John Perkins - he was a bestseller in German for his book on the follies of Pax Americanana.

Thank you. I am done. Sorry for the syntax - I am not a native speaker.

X-Ray Vision

“F. Scrooby, that is what I meant by saying no one wants to be identified as a WN = bigot = racist = Redneck = Hitler Nut - the other team has conditioned people to think like this.” (—X-ray)

Yes the Jews have deliberately conditioned people to think that of WNs but it isn’t why I don’t call myself a WN.  I don’t call myself a WN because I don’t see what a WN does that’s different from what a normal person does, and normalness needs no special name.  If I don’t rob banks or beat my wife am I to go by a special name, or am I normal?  If someone assigned me a special name for not robbing banks or beating my wife I’d reject it because I wouldn’t see a difference between an ordinary normal guy on the one hand, and on the other, a guy who didn’t rob banks or beat his wife.  What’s the difference?  The two guys are the same; likewise, an ordinary normal guy and a guy who, when government race-replaces whites, asks what’s going on.  They’re the same.  Let’s say government tried to change every white person into a Negro, two guys noticed, one questioned it, the other didn’t.  Which one was acting normal?  The one who questioned it.  The other one was being weird or something.  So why the special name for the one acting normal?  Why not just for the one acting weird? 

I’ll welcome a special name for myself as soon as I need one.  I don’t need one. 

“So in your mind White Nationalists are not normal?”-

I don’t know what White Nationalists are supposed to be.  Someone who questions forced race-replacement is just an ordinary normal person, nothing special in any way.

“Fred I think you could be more comfortable at Amren - they also feign being seen as extremists.”

I don’t follow —you’re saying I “feign being seen as extremist”?  What’s that supposed to mean? 

I’ve always felt quite comfortable at MR.com, thank you.

“I am not a native [English-]speaker.”

What are your race, nationality, and native tongue?
______

“ff” suffers from a medical condition called Synapse-Dearth.  (So does Andy Wooster.)

Those of you who still think that of Ron Paul as our savior should go read Brimelow’s interview with Ron Paul over at vdare.com Ron Paul stated that he is in favor of increasing legal immigration. You all understand what this means:more predatory asians in America. He is also infavor of increasing the H-1 visa program.

Please, no more of this Ron Paul cheerleading nonsense.

“I think you give Blecks too much credit. I doubt that in between robbing liquor stores, gin and juice they would have time to sit down and analyse WN and the dynamics of race unfolding. Maybe you watch too much TV where Blecks are numbered among the scientists, hackers and financial wizards.”

TG: Don’t kid yourself, X-Ray. There are plenty of Blacks that are quite capable of analyzing WN with the highest academic scrutiny. Didn’t you ever hear of the “talented tenth?” My life’s experience has taught me never judge a book by it’s cover. If you think ALL blacks are stupid or criminals, your perception is one of a fool… I, for one, never underestimate blacks.

“As far as I can see most of your gripes are caused by White Liberals or as Prof. MacDonald says the 1965 Holocaust engineered by the Kosher Semites posing as Euros. Perhaps Yanks understand why the world’s favourite Semites were quarantined in the Old World? “

TG: Yes. my gripes are with malevolent Jewish supremacists who are the main architects of the ethnic cleansing of White Gentiles...and the lunatic, ethno- masochistic, White-Gentile liberals that gleefully participate in advancing/promoting that agenda.

“About the money I am trying to make some first so that request is on hold but again that would render me subjective and make my book hard to sell - the pitch is neutrality - maybe if I make a bundle I will go to the North Pole - Russia just made a claim.”

TG: I was just joking about the money, but good luck with your book! I hope it becomes a bestseller. Please let us know when it’s published.

Scrooby said:

If I don’t rob banks or beat my wife am I to go by a special name, or am I normal?  If someone assigned me a special name for not robbing banks or beating my wife I’d reject it because I wouldn’t see a difference between an ordinary normal guy on the one hand, and on the other, a guy who didn’t rob banks or beat his wife.  What’s the difference? 

The difference is you live in a society where bank robbing, or the political-philosophical equivalent thereof, has become status quo. Even though you view your position as that representing normalcy, (so do I!), you have to acknowledge the fact that in popular discourse and mainstream opinion it is regarded as abnormal. Thus the need for a qualifying term for what, in ‘sane’ epoches, would be and was considered normal.

I’m not a White Nationalist.  I’m an ordinary completely apolitical normal person concerned about what’s going on around me.  I know nothing about White Nationalism.

That’s somewhat ingenuine, seeing as you’ve been hobnobbing with people who could roughly be categorized as WNs online, apparently for years now. I think you could guess, without any foreknowledge, 85% of any White Nationalist political platform presented anywhere. You could delineate with a high degree of accuracy the ideological forebears of WN thinking- you could present a number of historical examples supporting its arguments and theories - you could describe in detailed terms the struggle that necessitates such an ideology. Although you may not choose for yourself the term ‘White Nationalist’, you know a hell of a lot about WN, Fred. If there was a WN Gameshow, and you were in it against two other people picked at random off the street, you would return home a very rich man.

I think it was Mcguire or maybe Mantra who pointed out that White Nationalist do not hve an economic agenda that would appeal to a majority of White Americans. It seems-though I could be wrong about this-that many of them are pushing a Libertarian framework where millions of Americans are atomized creatures who have no value outside of free market transactions.

Ann Ryand? Most White Americans would find Hell itself more enjoyable than the kind of society she was so enamoured of

And James, I most definitely support big Goverment suppor of science programs

Waiting for another one of your usual obscure responses.

Libertarians don’t know how to run a society. Their intent is to destroy society.( I am Libertaraian on certian issues. I’m making the case against across the board Libertarianism)

It is not suprising that Ron Paul represents Texas interests. Texas elites have been some of the worst abusers of American labor.

That Ron Paul interview for VDare confirms my worst suspicions of RP. He’s clearly an anti-racist obsessed with economics. He probably thinks the only differences between Canada and Mexico are their respective economic systems. The only possible good his candidacy can do on the race replacement front is to moderate libertarian pro-immigrant sentiment. Oh well. At least he opposes global government and a Likudnik foreign policy.

Yes James, I think you might have zeroed in on our political differences.

Let me tell you something, I was disgusted by what Paul said at level ten on the emotional richter scale. When I explode, I tend to lash out at everyone.

How much longer will vdare.com play the silly citzenship game?

Why does vdare.com pretend to be above racial politics? It is really getting to be kind of silly Peter Brimelow. You won’t pursue a race based approach to immigration restriction because you are affraid of political liberals who will call you bad names. However these are the same politial Liberals who encourage the race based politics of hispanics and asians.

One last thing, does Peter Brimelow and Ron Paull seriously believe that it would be morally acceptable to coerce welfare recipients into agricultural slave labor? Look. I’m not oposed to serious discussions about welfare refrom. But giving poor people a slaves choice is really beyond the pale. If you want slaves for agriculture work use the robotics variety.

If yo are not wlling to vounteer to do work that you and everyone else knows is basically slaves work., don’t coerce other human beings into it.

Anyhow, I just thought I would register my disgust with legal immigrant Peter Brimelow and the great defender of the plantation slave owner class, the dishonorable Ron Paul.

Another British/Russian/Jew outlines the implications of FDR’s lend-lease programme to the British and the sustainability of the Empire.

John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Britain 1937-46
Robert Skidelsky A review

Above all, Keynes was disabled by a rationalist innocence that ignored the depth of America’s suspicions about Britain. Skidelsky notes that America’s third war aim after the defeat of the German and Japanese empires was the dissolution of the British version. In 1939-40 it mistook Britain for an opulent empire - one that had, moreover, defaulted in 1933 on its first world war American debts. Internationalist in trade when it had suited, in leaner times Britain had contracted into protectionism. America had made the same journey, but in an opposite direction. Now it wanted the abolition of imperial protection - both economically and politically.

“Lend-lease” was the background to Keynes’s failure. Roosevelt’s shifty improvisation was a solution to both Britain’s penury and American isolationism. America’s loan of equipment would help Britain “put out the fire”; it would also edge America towards war since the transport across the Atlantic would be vulnerable to U-boat attack. But behind the offer was a Democratic Party dominated by immigrant communities who hated all empires - including Britain’s. In return Britain had to accept limitations of both its exports and its gold and dollar reserves, meaning that it started the peace with the largest external debt in its history.

Keynes was the negotiator of grudging loans to avert the financial Dunkirk that loomed in the war’s second half. Justice mattered to him. It was important that Britain had suffered disproportionately during the war - but waving medals was a failure of tone. He had to deal with an American treasury official, Harry Dexter White, who thought that the world should be conveniently parcelled between the Americans and the Soviets. It was White’s proposal that Germany be “pastoralised” after the war and its industrial capacity destroyed. The critic of the Versailles Treaty’s vengeance was again among the barbarians.

There is comedy in Skidelsky’s account of all those Keynesian quips falling dead from his lips as the illusionless bosses look down from the saddle. But the keynote is pathos - that of a high-minded liberal unable to understand the gut-instinct hostility of a strange new world. At its most cynical interpretation, lend-lease enabled Britain to protect its empire in the Middle and Far East - but at a cunning cost. The means of immediate preservation were also designed to be those of the eventual enslavement of Britain’s domestic economy to the new imperium.

“The negotiations did not go smoothly,” Eden recalled, “nor did I altogether approve of the details of the final settlement. At one time the suggestion was put forward in Washington that the entire British West Indies should be handed over for the cancellation of our war debts. I thought this less than friendly bargaining. At another, the destroyers were to be exchanged for a public assurance that the British fleet would sail to North American waters if H itler gained control of the United Kingdom. The Prime Minister rightly protested that such an announcement would have a ‘disastrous effect’ on British morale. The West Indian bases alone were certainly worth more than 50 or 60 old destroyers… Our desperate straits alone could justify its terms.”

Churchill at the time called it “the most un-sordid act in the history of any nation”, but Eden noted: “Later the same month documents handing over bases in Newfoundland, Bermuda and the West Indies were signed.”