Posted by Fr. John on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:21 | #

The more I read of this man, the more I realize he truly IS in the ranks of Jefferson, Adams, and the Founding Fathers.

Amazing, that a man of such principle and stature can be contrasted in a heartbeat with a mere figurehead politico who is nothing more than a cultist ‘pretty face’ (I am speaking of Romney, of course).

Posted by Prozium on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 15:31 | #

Yes, I know. That’s why I voted for him.

Posted by GT on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:55 | #

The aracial neo-constitutionalist Ron Paul has done exactly what Maguire and I feared he would do - in spades:

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/

“Let me tell you my thoughts. With Romney gone, the chances of a brokered convention are nearly zero. But that does not affect my determination to fight on, in every caucus and primary remaining, and at the convention for our ideas, with just as many delegates as I can get. But with so many primaries and caucuses now over, we do not now need so big a national campaign staff, and so I am making it leaner and tighter. Of course, I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run. I do not denigrate third parties—just the opposite, and I have long worked to remove the ballot-access restrictions on them. But I am a Republican, and I will remain a Republican.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_presidential_campaign,_2008#First_quarter_2008

“In February, suicide terrorism expert professor Robert Pape joined the campaign as foreign policy advisor; Ivan Eland and Leon Hadar also joined Paul’s foreign policy team.[38]”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Hadar

”Dr. Hadar graduated from Hebrew University in Jerusalem and completed his graduate studies at Columbia University, where he earned M.A. degreees from the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism and the School of International and Public Affairs as well as a certificate from the Middle East Institute. He received his Ph.D. from the School of International Service (SIS) at American University.”

The bottom of the wiki article says he’s an Israeli citizen.

<u>Translation:</u> 

Fire local white organizational staff and hire Washington-NYC-Jerusalem Jews to loot the remaining stash of campaign funds.

I suppose we can forget about keeping Ron Paul’s campaign organization around for OUR purposes.

Posted by GT on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:21 | #

Despite our reservations about Ron Paul my sons walked precincts for the man from the very git-go of his campaign.  They’ve learned another hard lesson, I’m afraid, about national campaigns orchestrated on the Internet.  The virtual isn’t real.  White political movements must be local, perpetual, and built upon <u>microcommunities and alternate economics:</u>  Real stuff for real people.

Posted by GT on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:04 | #

Of course, America has made great strides in race relations over the past forty years. However, this progress is due to changes in public attitudes and private efforts. Relations between the races have improved despite, not because of, the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

Therefore, the 1964 Civil Rights Act didn’t hurt race relations except in a minority of cases where Whites were negatively effected.  To this liberals say, “one must break a few eggs to make an omelet.”

Ron Paul!  Ron Paul!  Robert Pape!  Ivan Eland!  Leon Hadar!  Ron Paul!  Ron Paul!

Posted by GT on Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:25 | #

I really hate to do this.  Ah hell, no I don’t…  After all, my kids and I need it as much as anybody else.  So, in the interest of reinforcing the medicine prescribed for others…

Won’t Get Fooled Again – The Who

{…}

“There’s nothing in the street
Looks any different to me
And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye
And the parting on the left
Is now the parting on the right
And the beards have all grown longer overnight

“I’ll tip my hat to the new constitution
Take a bow for the new revolution
Smile and grin at the change all around me
Pick up my guitar and play
Just like yesterday
Then I’ll get on my knees and pray
We don’t get fooled again
Don’t get fooled again
No, no!

“Meet the new boss
Same as the old boss”

Wanna bet that many on the racialist right have “learned” the wrong lesson from the Ron Paul {RIP} experience? 

I’ll bet the idea that all voting is useless has been reinforced.

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:37 | #

Don’t just grouse.

If you haven’t already started other projects with your local Ron Paul supporters, better strike while the iron is hot.

You want to set up local economies, industries, agriculture, practical skills education, etc? 

Ron Paul supporters are great for it (well compared to your typical demographic—I know… I know…) and now is the time.

Posted by GT on Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:15 | #

JB writes:  Don’t just grouse.

Yes, you’re right.  That’s what I’m doing.  Since receiving the “leaner and tighter” email I’ve been pissed about R. Paul’s {RIP} capitulation and sell-out to the kikes, as are family members and friends – one of whom made nice contributions to the campaign.  The fact I knew this would happen but ultimately “rolled with flow” has led to a small personal and strategic reassessment, along with the hope that others might be encouraged to do the same.  Then there’s the fact that outside of my relatively tiny group I don’t know how serious RP supporters – especially the racial nationalist wing who should be “leading the revolution,” so to speak – are about getting off their asses and doing real work toward White independence at the local level.  I’m not encouraged, which is why I complain.  Nevertheless I persist, because at worst I’m nothing more than a “persona non grata” member of a historically unsuccessful non-movement and at best I may help to inspire a handful of young doers to succeed.

R. Paul:  I am committed to fighting for our ideas within the Republican party, so there will be no third party run.

No third party effort and a campaign (with its funds) turned over to kikes.  Straight from the horse’s mouth.  Get it through your heads, folks:  The Republican Party must be destroyed, regardless of who is running for president.  But voting for Hillbama is not the answer.  Worse is not necessarily better.  We must build our own political infrastructure comprised of perpetual, independent campaigns in rural areas and based upon collaborative microcommunities, alternate local economies, and alternate local social support groups.

Posted by James Bowery on Sun, 10 Feb 2008 08:26 | #

Might I suggest a good first step for Ron Paul resources (people now feeling discarded) is getting them to understand that they need to accept local currency minted by farmers to pay them for laboring on the farms—in exchange for the farmers guaranteeing that they’ll accept 90% of their payment for food in the same local currency.

Remember, the Ron Paul audiences applaud most loudly for the repeal of the Federal Reserve Act—and they have very serious awareness of inflating food prices.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:18 | #

“The Trouble with Forced Integration”  (—from the entry’s title)

Here‘s a concrete example of that trouble, one of thousands of concrete examples that take place every year in this country if not every month at some level or other (probably every week, when you get right down to it).

(Hat tip)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:11 | #

See this man’s [url=“http://www.epost.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=144913&command=displayContent&sourceNode=231190&home=yes&more;_nodeId1= 144922&c>bloody face</a>?  The Pope, the Vatican, the Archbishop of Canterbury, and the Church of England as a whole join the Jews in rejoicing over it.  They join the Jews in being ecstatic that it has happened.  They love looking at this photo and want to see more, lots more, just like it and worse.  They crave it. 

How do we know all that?  Because of their steadfast refusal to do anything to put a stop to it though their power to help stop it is immense, and not just that but they viciously attack any good folk who step forward no matter how politely, respectfully, and timidly to question in the least what’s going on.  They slander, punish, crush that person completely. 

They neither work toward a remedy well within reach nor countenance any who do. 

When you stubbornly refuse to stop something you could easily help thwart and, moreover, you methodically launch dramatic, hysterical, absolutely illogical and shockingly mendacious but extremely aggressive and damaging onslaughts against those who are politely and respectfully trying to find some remedy, the meaning is clear.  No one flies into a frightful rage at attempts to end what he hates, only at attempts to end what he loves and adores with every fiber of his being. 

The Pope, the Vatican, and the Catholics join the Jews in loving and adoring this photo with every fiber of their being.

(<a href=“http://www.thecivicplatform.com/2008/01/20/white-victim-of-black-gang-attack-uk/”]Hat tip[/url])

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:38 | #

I heartily agree with “anonymous lawyer,” this is very good news for our side.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:40 | #

Excuse me, make that “anonymous attorney,” not “anonymous lawyer.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 16 Feb 2008 06:58 | #

On Vdare.com’s Letters-to-the-Editor page, refreshing common sense from abroad:

From here in England I am watching the American presidential primary season.  I am constantly amazed by the apparently acceptable racist comments (about Barack Obama) and sexist remarks (about Hillary Clinton) that go unchallenged.  Woman after woman makes the same remark regarding feminism when explaining a vote for that arch-harridan Hillary Clinton:  “I’m voting for Clinton because she’s a woman.”  Ditto for racism:  “I am voting for Obama because he is black”  —  conveniently forgetting that he is also Hussein, and partly educated in a Muslim public school in Indonesia.

But imagine if a male voter said he was voting for Ron Paul because he is “white and male.”  No way!  The race lobby would go collectively berserk, the sky would fall in and the uproar would never end.

What blatant double standards.

I would find it impossible to vote for either Clinton or Obama.  Clinton is evil and represents evil people.  Obama is lightweight, trading on his race and with a dubious and dangerous background that is ignored by the mainstream media for reasons I know not.

Yet I would never vote for John McCain either.  He’s a traitor and a war criminal in his support not only for the illegal Iraq war but also the conflict in Yugoslavia.

The American voter will be between a rock and a hard place come November.  I hope to God you Americans don’t destroy your country by your choice, whoever it may be.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:51 | #

More from “Anonymous Attorney”:

A LAWYER’S ADVICE TO VICTIMIZED WHITE MEN:  SUE!  NOW!

Re: Peter Brimelow’s Column:  Invisible Victims: White Males and the Crisis of Affirmative Action Revisited

From: “Anonymous Attorney”

Sometimes, tough guys file lawsuits

One roadblock to publicizing the incredible injustices against white males is the mistaken sense that “grown men don’t cry.” 

As a one-time successful complainant about an affirmative action program that hurt white men (namely, me) and as one who otherwise generally looks askance at litigation to solve problems, I hereby encourage white men to get litigious.  Now!

It amazed me, in the years that followed, to see the reactions to my own personal case. 

“So what?” and “Who cares?” issued from the mouths of liberal types who’d melt to the floor at the mention of far lesser slights directed at blacks, Hispanics, etc. 

A politically liberal relative with feminist leanings snorted that I should “get over it.”  Some conservatives were supportive but others, incredibly, had the same reaction—or did not believe (despite media coverage) what I was telling them. 

This was by turns frustrating and painful.  My experience was dismissed as a lie, and then I would be treated to a lecture on how evil white males “owned everything” and needed to be reined in.

So, white men (and sometimes, white women), don’t think of your complaint or lawsuit as weakness.  Think of it as strength.  Think of it as a blow to the enemy. 

Believe me, at our society’s current level of arrogance about the casual mistreatment of white men, they won’t see it coming.

“Anonymous Attorney” is a former resident of New York. 

[See embedded links in original text at first link above.]

Posted by rocket on Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:47 | #

Anyone that wants to abolish the CIA , the IRS , the patriot act , ROE v Wade , is against the war , and against intervening in the affairs of other nations has my vote. the cool thing about Ron PAUL is that he uses the word Empire about America so many times. this is something that pat buchanan , gore vidal , and many others have been doing for years. but Paul is actually doing it on t.v in debates . i love it !

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:55 | #

I had the following comment all ready to post:

When Prozium’s got his mojo working he’s right up there with the best.  Read this, for example.  (Poor John Zmirak, simply out-classed and shown up for the zero he is by the unknown amateur blogger “Prozium.”  I wouldn’t want to be in his shoes right now.)

But then this caught my eye:

”I think race is real and important, but not everything.”

So I’m putting everything on hold until I find out what’s up with that last comment.  (Prozium’s like that — he’s apt to show flashes of brilliance followed by ... well ... to be charitable let’s just call it “followed by disappointments” ...)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:40 | #

Look, I loathe McCain as much as Ann Coulter does but I’m in favor of giving a man a chance to show there’s some good in him before utterly condemning him, and if it’s true McCain told this joke at that big GOP meeting,

Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? 

Because her father is Janet Reno,

the guy can’t be all bad ...  There’s gotta be a lot that’s genuinely fine and good in this man ...

I’m voting for him!

Posted by Steve Edwards on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:21 | #

LOL!

It doesn’t matter who wins, anyway. It might as well be McCain. The winner will have to deal with the evaporation of trillions of dollars of “wealth”, tens of millions of pissed off bankrupts, and an ethnic civil war.

Let McCain see if he can’t sort all that out!

Posted by Matra on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:01 | #

Prozium:I think race is real and important, but not everything.”

Fred:So I’m putting everything on hold until I find out what’s up with that last comment.  (Prozium’s like that — he’s apt to show flashes of brilliance followed by ... well ... to be charitable let’s just call it “followed by disappointments” ...)

Well, actually race is NOT everything as several of us have argued at this site. Yet when we’ve said that ethnicity and nationality are more substantive identities and so they should usually come first it has often been Prozium (under other names) who has disagreed and proclaimed that “whiteness” is all that matters. I guess he has changed his mind.  I recall him once saying he could never vote for a creationist like Tom Tancredo then turning around about a week later and arguing at his blog that Tancredo was the best candidate because he put immigration first. So what does he consider to be the priority this week?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 04:56 | #

Race-replacement.  Don’t leave home without it.

The Realist gets inside the race-replacement machine and examines one or two of the gears close-up, in a log entry à propos of the mortgage/foreclosure mess.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:34 | #

In the comments thread underneath this Inverted World log entry a reader signing as “John PM” faces some ... uhhh ... “truths,” shall we say? ... faces some truths about college-educated white Obama voters:

[...] Comrade Obama does seem to have picked up that magical mystery “momentum” of the idiot factor in the Democratic Party and will be their nominee.  He “inspires” the lowest of the low in the white population of that crowd, the “educated” and hopelessly sheltered suburban “liberals”:  the obnoxiously “informed” hypocrites who in middle age feel that because they can sit through a BET( * ) presentation and feel all warm and fuzzy rather than nauseated [...], or [because they] encourage their children to see race as a meaningless “social construct” of tyrannical “white privileges” that, while undeserved, are best considered from the comforts of a majority white university or neighborhood, they represent not [merely] a “greater good” but the alpha and omega of “intellectual” transcendence.  Thus, in the comfort of a voting booth in their sheltered bubbles of socio-economically controlled “diversity” they vote for a fantasy come to life in the form of a utopian mulatto, [one who], while not forgetting, is willing to “forgive” their original sin of “intrinsic racism.”

______

*  Scroob note:  If the cable company where you live doesn’t carry BET — mine doesn’t — just substitute PBS here, or any of the New-and-Improved Jewish Walt Disney Company’s all-Negro-all-Mexican-all-Oriental-zero-Caucasian Disneyworld TV commercials.  If you’re a college-educated white Obama supporter and you happen to catch one of those Jewish Disney All-Negro-All-The-Time Disneyworld commercials be prepared to have the cockles of your heart majorly warmed.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 01:04 | #

Ann Coulter makes excellent points, as usual:

Ann Coulter writes on the increase in the media’s power to pick candidates, especially Republican candidates:

“This is why you will cast your eyes about the nation in vain for another Reagan sitting in any governor’s mansion or U.S. Senate seat.  Pro-lifers like to ask, ‘How many Einsteins have we lost to abortion?’  I ask:  How many Reagans have we lost to campaign-finance reform?”

Aside from celebrities, the totally driven, and billionaires, the field is limited to:

“Mainstream media-anointed candidates like John McCain and B. Hussein Obama.

“What a bizarre coincidence that a few years after the most draconian campaign-finance laws were imposed via McCain-Feingold, our two front-runners happen to be the media’s picks!  It’s uncanny — almost as if by design!  (Can I stop now, or do you people get sarcasm?)

“By prohibiting speech by anyone else the campaign-finance laws have vastly magnified the power of the media — which, by the way, are wholly exempt from speech restrictions under campaign-finance laws.  The New York Times doesn’t have to buy ad time to promote a politician; it just has to call McCain a ‘maverick’ 1 billion times a year.

“It is because of campaign-finance laws like McCain-Feingold that big men don’t run for office any more.  Little men do.  And John McCain is the head homunculus.”

Posted by Fred Scrooby on Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:27 | #

Forced integration’s effect on teaching math:

Fifty Years of Math 1957-2007

Teaching Math In 1950s:  A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100.  His cost of production is 4/5 of the price.  What is his profit?

Teaching Math In 1960s:  A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100.  His production cost is 4/5 of the price or $80.  What is his profit?

Teaching Math In 1970s:  A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100.  His cost of production is $80.  Did he make a profit?

Teaching Math In 1980s:  A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100.  His cost of production is $80 and his profit is $20.  Your assignment:  Underline the number 20.

Teaching Math In 1990s:  A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate, and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands.  He does this so he can make a profit of $20.  What do you think of this way of making a living?

Topic for class participation after answering the question:  How did the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes?  There are no wrong answers.

Teaching Math In 2007:  Un hachero vende una carretada de madera para $100.  El costo de produccion es $80.  Cuanto dinero ha hecho?

Posted by didier on Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:10 | #

Marx was right about social class and money. now more money to elite whites , less money to middle class whites

more global power for ruling whites, less civil rights for average whites.