The English Defence League march in Birmingham, 4th July 2009

Posted by Bill on July 01, 2009, 08:32 PM | #

SIX KEY FACTS

From Migration Watch.

Net immigration has quadrupled since 1997 to 237,000 a year.

A migrant now arrives nearly every minute.

We must build a new home every six minutes for new migrants.

England is already the most crowded country in Europe (except Malta)

Immigration will add 7 million to the population of England in the next 20 years - that is 7 times the population of Birmingham.

To keep the population of the UK below 70 million, immigration must be reduced by 75%. Government measures so far may reduce it by 5%.

http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/

Now then let’s see, where do these people live when they get here?  There are private houses, there is private rented accommodation, there is social housing (mainly housing associations?) there is bed and breakfast accommodation and hotel accommodation and that’s about it.

Every year, with natural population increase, (mainly immigrant) plus newcomers equates roughly to 1/3 of a million new souls added to the population.  These people need shelter in some form another.

The social housing building programme is nowhere near reaching these numbers so there is nowhere to go but to the list I’ve just given.

Whatever the mix of accommodation is, I would opine that it is the taxpayer who is footing the bill, and that bill must total in the billions of pounds.

This is a huge transfer of wealth from the taxpayer to the private sector.

My information is purely intuitive, I haven’t a clue of any official figures, not I suspect there are any.

If a migrant family step of a 747 and apply for housing then where do they live?  They must live somewhere or there would be families living in shop door-ways and I don’t see any evidence of that.

So you Guardianistas where do they live, and who allocated the property?  And who was elbowed aside?

Whatever happened to those three million houses to be built that Brown dreamed up?

As I’ve said before, most things don’t make sense, are people disappearing down a black hole or what?

I’ve also said that new Labour’s ten year boom was down to immigration and the housing bubble.  Now that bubble has burst and it ain’t coming back, we’re broke and getting broker by the day, trouble is, the immigrant gravy train is still careering down the the track and new homes will be needed by the millions (over-time)

I think it ain’t going to happen, by then we’ll have passed the tipping point, tipping being the operative word, they’ll just tip us out.

This crazy situation must be intentional, our elites must intend destabilising our country, to bring about chaos, tension and violence - but our politicians are so dysfunctional I still wonder if they really know what’s they’re doing?

I find myself asking the question more and more, how far down the system do the hierarchy know the the real score, do Brown and Cameron really know what the eventual aim is?

Posted by Guessedworker on July 01, 2009, 11:14 PM | #

There are two great unknowns concerning the organisers of the Luton and, now, the Birmingham protests.  Who are they, and what is their agenda?

The Luton protest looked a very ad hoc affair.  I had assumed it was organised by Luton Town football supporters.  It certainly wasn’t put together by recognised nationalists.  Some of the individuals involved wore balaclavas, which was odd, given that the protest was non-political and even included a few black (ish) faces.  There were signs warning off the National Front (who, presumably, had attempted to infiltrate the march).

According to this video, after Luton came a walk through enriched Whitechapel in London on 27th June, billed as being by the English and Welsh Defence Leagues.  It was a very small affair:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiTUG-2nOcA&feature=related

Overall, it is an interesting development.  Like a lot of people, I’d just like to know more about it.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on July 02, 2009, 12:39 AM | #

Can someone say where Griffin’s Mindbenders can be found online?

Posted by Dan Dare on July 02, 2009, 01:04 AM | #

Try

http://heretical.com/British/mindbend/index.html

Posted by Dan Dare on July 02, 2009, 01:43 AM | #

Bill asked

Now then let’s see, where do these people live when they get here?

The answer appears to depend on who they are and why they came. According to the report from the LSE The Impact of Recent Immigration on the London Economy published in 2007 (available for download here [pdf file]), migrants in general appear to ‘drift’ into social housing in greater numbers over time.

The report has a table on page 38 which gives the percentage of each of four population groups occupying each type type of housing by period of residence (under/over three years):

- Migrants from ‘rich’ countries in social rented housing: 6% of those resident less that 3 years, 21% of those resident for three years or more;

- Migrants from ‘asylum-seeking’ countries: 35% and 46%, respectively;

- Migrants from ‘other poor’ countries: 21% and 37%, respectively.

For comparison, 26% of UK-born residents occupy social housing. All these figures apply to London. This data would seem to give the lie to the Guardian’s propagandizing that foreigners do not enjoy a disproportionate share of the available social housing, at least in London.

Posted by Bill on July 02, 2009, 04:26 AM | #

How come Griffin’s Who are the Mindbenders has lain dormant all this time?

The most influential manner in which the MSM manipulates the populace is by setting the discussed agenda.

Poll after poll over the years, indicate that immigration is of the greatest concern to the British people, and yet every time the subject is raised, especially at election time, the subject of immigration is hijacked by the MSM and supplanted with the economy.  In short, immigration becomes sidelined to oblivion, within a very short time the subject of immigration is quietly forgotten.

The number of times that this has happened is legion, during the 2005 general election a semi determined effort was raised to pursue the immigration debate, I’ve heard tell that the message came down from on high that this discussion was to be terminated by all parties.  Immigration disappeared of the map.

As millions more immigrants arrive the more the people become aware of what is happening.  The MSM and politicians have to redouble their efforts to steer the subject off limits, each time it becomes more and more difficult, but the MSM still succeed.

These diversionary tactics are taking place as I punch this keyboard, the subject aunt Sallies to distract us are endless and we all know what they are, from celebrity to sport, soaps, to reality TV.  We collectively call these distractions bread and circuses, but there is one subject that the MSM resort to every time, for they know this subject will deliver, that subject is the economy, as slick Willy Clinton once famously said, it’s the economy stoopid.

It’s true, steering the immigration debate to the economy is a killer - works every time.

As I tap out these words I become so dismayed, for I am not saying anything new here, it’s all been said before ad infinitum, but it makes no difference, and the reason it makes no difference is because we, as a people are stoopid, the MSM know this and treat us accordingly.

There is absolutely no question, that flat screen in our living room is the most potent weapon ever devised to manipulate the emotions and opinions of the masses, again, I’m not saying anything new, Orwell knew all this years ago.

And what’s more he warned us about its evil powers.  It is a pity it was only the other side who took advantage of it.

Do you think Griffin would like to be reminded of what he wrote some twelve years ago?  Perhaps it’s time to blow the dust of the covers.

Posted by Bill on July 02, 2009, 04:39 AM | #

Re above - Sorry, a couple of of’s should be off, if you get what I mean.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on July 02, 2009, 04:56 AM | #

Thanks, D.D. I’ll check it out since the MSM has brought to my attention.

Posted by Bill on July 02, 2009, 05:01 AM | #

Who are they, and what is their agenda?

If they are football supporters it raises an interesting question, a question I have often asked. (myself)

The most successful infiltratation and assimilation by the ‘other’ into our culture is the non white footballer, he has been accepted and feted by every club in the land.  Hmmm, interesting?

The football entertainment industry is supported by tens of thousands of such young men (and women) up and down the country, so it does seem odd that they are in turn at odds with race.

Perhaps they are not at odds with race per se, perhaps they are only at odds with the ‘other’ who don’t play or support foootball at all, ie Asian Muslims.

I’ve posted before, what a potent force a few tens of thousands of these types could be in the future,
especially if you add the million and half NEETS* into the equation.

*Not in Education, Employment or Training.

Posted by Bill on July 02, 2009, 06:45 AM | #

It’s odd that the term White Flight hasn’t really caught on in Britain.

Like every other Western nation white flight is a phenomenon that affects each and all. 

The term white flight I assume was coined in America, for how long white flight has been a feature of American life I have no idea.

Here in Britain I have never seen the term white flight in print or heard it mentioned on the MSM, all of which would seem to indicate that there is no such thing - but which of course there is.

Britain has and is being badly affect by white flight, no mystery really, where non whites move in, whites who can, move out.  Not exactly rocket science you might say.

Which all brings a mysterious and far reaching consequences for British people.  For years now, the price of property has been going through the proverbial roof.  As the inner cities succumb to the enriched, then whites move out to the suburbs, thereby by ratcheting up the price of houses, which in turn pushes out the indigenous first time buyer - who then has to either move on or turn to the private rented sector for shelter.

The problem becomes twofold, increased prices and acute shortage of availability.

But the connection is never made to immigration, the MSM simply ignore the effects of immigration on the price and availability of property as though it didn’t exist.

Since the subprime bubble burst, the price of property has plummeted, but this hasn’t alleviated these problems one iota.  The lack of mortgages and the over demand caused by continued immigration ensure these problems will still exist and get worse.

There is one huge problem building up here, this circle is not going to be squared, I really don’t see a solution.  We cannot build new houses at the required rate - not ever!

The question becomes ever more urgent, where are the newcomers going to live?

Shanty towns anybody?  Converted sea containers?

You never know.

Posted by david roach on July 02, 2009, 09:44 PM | #

Who are the English Defence league or the Welsh Defence league?  Are they a Zionist front group?

Posted by Bo Sears on July 02, 2009, 10:15 PM | #

To Bill on July 02, 2009, 06:45 AM—

The term “white flight” isn’t a term used by Euro-Americans or the diverse white American peoples.  It is used against them.

The real description of what you call “white flight” is simply “ethnic cleansing” by the other, not a voluntary act by the diverse whites.

A good example of this phenomenon was when a rabid Latino who writes for the San Jose Mercury News wrote a story comparing Latino departures from California as a “Latino diaspora” while calling the Euro-American departures from California as “white flight.”

It’s like “reverse discrimination.” There’s no such thing as “reverse discrimination,” there’s just discrimination.  And there’s no such thing as “white flight,” there’s just ethnic cleansing.

Posted by Ethnomasochism-in-Action on July 03, 2009, 01:18 AM | #

Self-loathing Canadian journalist Jeffrey Simpson of the Globe & Mail offers a luminous example of why Whites are being dispossessed from their lands, without providing any resistance. In the case of Simpson, he’s an enthusiastic cheerleader of our replacement. Note the same old same old Left-liberal, multiculti, progressive, immigrationist, pluralistic, peecee, and, above all else, “modern” propaganda one continuously is exposed to in our irrelevant and conformist (and dying, thank God!) )papers. One cannot imagine a column that strays from the multicultural party line getting published in a major Western journal. Michaelle Jean is Canada’s first Negro (Haitian) governor general (following in the footsteps of the first Oriental, and equally exotic, Andrienne Clarkson), she made international headlines recently for eating a seal’s raw heart, arguably one of the most bizarre moments this century:

Ms. Jean is a great deal more charismatic than the dull white men running our national political parties. And what a contrast she will offer this fall when one of the British royals wanders around Canada.

Prince Charles is coming in November. If his very presence doesn’t drive up the number of people who want to clip our umbilical ties to the British monarchy, nothing will. In fact, in a poll conducted by The Strategic Counsel for The Globe and Mail and CTV, 65 per cent of Canadians think we should cut those ties after a new monarch is crowned.

The contrast between the very Canadian, contemporary, bilingual, multicultural, modern, worldly Ms. Jean and the stodgy British prince and king-to-be (with Camilla) will be startling. Ms. Jean also will be an excellent host, and showcase for Canada, when she greets the many heads of state attending the Winter Olympics in British Columbia in February.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/why-canadians-owe-great-thanks-to-michalle-jean/article1202410/http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/640978

What a piece of shit.

Posted by Friedrich Braun on July 03, 2009, 01:28 AM | #

She’s just a visible sign of our ongoing dispossession.

Posted by John on July 03, 2009, 10:09 AM | #

She’s just a visible sign of our ongoing dispossession.

I was really saddened by the tone of frustration and resignation in the comments (though nearly all against the multicult) about “Swiss” “youths” running amok in Munich.

http://www.abendzeitung.de/muenchen/116544

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 12:58 PM | #

Good job, Scotch-Irish!  You got rid of the gypsy invader!  Never for one second did you even consider listening to the Jew World Order commanding you to subordinate yourselves to the non-whites, to accept your race-replacement, and to suck it up:

http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2009/07/03/how-do-they-do-it/

My hat’s off to you.  Great race of men, both in Ulster and in Dixie! 

And my middle finger is held high in the air as a gesture in the direction of Gerry Adams who, with Sinn Fein, has ostentatiously sided with the Sub-Saharan African Negro invaders of the Republic against his own white countrymen, telling the invaders he “stands shoulder-to-shoulder with them”:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yJ87y7BR80

Gerry, you and the Sinn Fein are sewage, not to mention unrepentant cowardly murderers of women, children, infants, and old men.  You were bad before, now you’ve gone from bad to worse.  May you all rot in hell.

Posted by Gerry Adams Irishman or Jew? on July 03, 2009, 01:32 PM | #

Am I the only one who is struck by Gerry Adams’ strongly non-Irish appearance? He does not look like any Irishmen I’ve met - rather, everything about him says JEW.

It would hardly surprise if the archives show Sinn Fein an example of “controlled opposition”.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 01:36 PM | #

Mangan, citing a new entry posted at n/a’s HBD blog, reports findings from the mid-1950s that the best U.S. WW II combat pilots had British, Irish, German, or Scand ancestry, in that order (and Jews, being good at figures, got sent instead to navigator school):

http://mangans.blogspot.com/2009/07/old-americans-more-successful-wwii.html

(Just kidding about the Jews — I’m sure they made fine pilots, and Latté Island’s Jewish uncle was one, but Mangan does refer to one true story he heard over National Public Radio ...)

Only one percent of combat pilots were of Med descent (eat your heart out, Dienekes!). 

(Why do I go out of my way to racially taunt Dienekes?  Because he goes out of his way to 1) gloat over any and all instances of race-replacement of Northern/Northwestern Euros, and 2) he has now gone to the pathetic extreme, astounding even for a dagoe like him, of denying the existence of a European race altogether and of an ethnocultural/historic entity known as Europe, creating instead, in his pathetic narrow little oh-so-fragile, wounded, and resentment-filled dagoe mind, a concentric Med/Turkish world extending out in all directions including eastward from a Greek center, oblivious to anything distinctive lying northward or westward.  Dienekes, there are plenty of white Greeks, tons.  I’ve personally known many.  But you certainly aren’t one.  And you’ll never be.  You’re hopeless, pathetic, and a race-traitor.)

(File under:  “Pontic Greeks With So Much Personal Turk Ancestry They Go To The Extreme of Denying Europe’s Existence In An Effort To Cover It Up By Blurring Out Euro-NonEuro Ethnoracial Distinctions”)

Posted by Q on July 03, 2009, 01:55 PM | #

Am I the only one who is struck by Gerry Adams’ strongly non-Irish appearance?

I have an Irish Catholic in-law that could pass for Gerry Adams identical twin. The hair style the beard the glasses the attire the gait the age, the multicultural/multiracial zeal—all the same.

I’ve always thought:  Irish liberals are the only people more nauseating than “liberal” Jews.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 01:56 PM | #

To the guy who posted signing as “Gerry Adams, Irishman or Jew?”:  maybe I’m not one to talk, since I do a huge amount of Jew-critique and many find my stuff illegitimate, abrasive, and wrong, but there’s a right way and a wrong way to do Jew-criticism and your way of doing it (I’m certain you’ve posted many comments that engage in it, signing each time with a different name) seems the kind someone would post who was trying to condemn-by-caricature.  Change the way you do it, please.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 02:02 PM | #

To Q:  of course there’s nothing whatsoever unIrish-looking about Gerry Adams, absolutely nothing.  The guy who posted that comment may be here trying to attack the site by what he hopes is damaging “caricature.” He’s posted lots of commentary exactly like that, and I ask him above to stop.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 02:08 PM | #

The more I think about it, the more I suspect that’s what the guy is trying to do, attack the site with his conception of “ridicule-by-over-the-top-caricature.” Either that or he’s an ignoramus.  Regardless of which he is, the guy is a negative for us.

Posted by Gerry Adams Irishman or Jew? on July 03, 2009, 02:58 PM | #

“Fred Scrooby” hasn’t left any soft readers for other commentators to scare off. No one’s offended but the part-Jew, which is understandable.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 03:43 PM | #

I can see my reputation travels.

Just mind your manners and your style and you won’t draw criticism.

Posted by Guessedworker on July 03, 2009, 05:31 PM | #

The English Defence League now has a website:

http://www.englishdefenceleague.co.uk/index.html

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 07:01 PM | #

Letter to the English Defence League:

Your group’s home page says, “This is not about race or colour, it’s about having the piss taken out of us.”

You may not readily see that it’s about race and colour — but rest assured, whether you see it yet or not, you’re having the piss taken out of you on a race-and-colour basis, not just a religious (militant Islam) basis.  If you don’t see it, you will.  Just as the British overlords would like to impose Islam as Britain’s religion and culture, they would like to impose non-whites as Britain’s race and get you, the whites, permanently out of the picture:  the wages you demand are too high, you see, the workplace safety you expect too expensive, the promise you hold (thanks to your inborn racial intelligence) for eventually moving up and competing with today’s powerful too unwelcome.  The men “in place” now want low wages, an end to demands for worker benefits and safe workplaces, and an end to any threat of competition from whites who, currently “lower down,” may in future have what it takes to “move up.” Have these same unscrupulous, deceitful overlords brainwashed you to think protesting your own race-replacement is “evil” because it is “racist”?  Yes obviously they have and why’s that, do you suppose?  To ask the question is to answer it.  In fact, to protest against your own race-replacement is neither “evil” nor “racist,” but right, proper, and necessary, a solemn moral obligation owed yourselves, your ancestors, and your offspring unto remotest future posterity.  Don’t stop at protesting just “militant Islam.” Consider protesting against the current “race and colour” transformations of Britain as well, which aren’t happening by themselves but are being forced from the men at the top — give that some thought, for the same ones shoving Islam down Britain’s throat (and it’s not the Moslems doing the shoving, it’s your own white governments both Labour and Tory doing it) intend to shove race-replacement down your throats until you, the whites, are a vulnerable minority in your own ancestral homeland.  Unbelievable?  Yes.  But true.  Expand your protests beyond militant Islam so as to take into account the full scope of the crime being perpetrated against the British people, including that crime’s race and colour dimension.

Best wishes.

Posted by Aun Doorback on July 03, 2009, 07:28 PM | #

Fred

They’re making a good start FFS. They say more than their prayers.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 03, 2009, 08:35 PM | #

I agree, Aun.  Never meant to imply otherwise.

Posted by Guessedworker on July 03, 2009, 09:00 PM | #

Some inside info:

http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/2009/07/english-welsh-defence-league-london.html

Posted by Bill on July 03, 2009, 10:57 PM | #

GW July 03, 2009, 09:00 PM

Just had a quick look-see over at the link on this post.

Prompted a quick search.  Here’s something that is rarely discussed here - if at all.

This was the first result of search Left’s alliance with Muslims

An unlikely alliance

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/30/islam.religion

Posted by Conservatism in the West is a Joke on July 03, 2009, 11:16 PM | #

Conservatives funding sexual deviants and perverts with our tax dollars:

Last week’s announcement of a $400,000 grant to Toronto’s Gay Pride Week is the latest indication of how detached the Harper Conservatives have become from their key supporters and how incoherent their evolving electoral strategy is as a result. That the government has not triggered a grassroots revolt by now is remarkable, a testament to the discipline of party members more than their loyalty. A few more announcements like this, however, and it won’t be able to count on that either.

Anyone who has attended Gay Pride Week knows that it has nothing whatsoever to do with being gay and everything to do with being as lewd and offensive as possible. It’s Marti Gras run amok. Public nudity is de rigueur at a gay pride parade, as are simulated sex acts of all kind, and some not so simulated. I’m not gay, but I suspect that such shockingly bawdy behaviour is embarrassing to many who are.

But this isn’t about Gay Pride Week and its climactic parade through the streets of downtown Toronto – it’s about what the Harper Conservatives stand for… if anything.

A few months ago the Prime Minister himself gave a keynote address to grassroots conservatives attending a major conference in Ottawa in which he extolled the importance of faith, family and community to the country in general and his government in particular. One wonders how he can reconcile those words with the decision of his Secretary of State for Small Business and Tourism to authorize this grant. After all, there isn’t much faith, family or community in evidence in the weeklong event – unless you count Toronto’s BDSM community that is. (For those of you who don’t know what BDSM stands for – trust me, you probably don’t really want to.)

Even from a purely electoral point of view, the grant makes no sense. It’s been said that the only things certain in life are death and taxes. I’m pretty confident that you can add to that list that fact that nobody – I repeat, nobody – will vote conservative simply because the Harper government suddenly decided to celebrate and promote a radical version of gay “culture”. On the contrary, if anything the conservatives will lose votes, and not just amongst social conservatives either. Fiscal conservatives, already unnerved by the growing debt and ballooning deficit, are sure to be turned off by this grant as well, especially since it is being justified, in part, as part of the government’s economic stimulus package.

...

http://josephbenami.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=93&Itemid=34

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 04, 2009, 04:18 AM | #

I clicked on GW’s Lionheart link a few above.  Look at this video I saw there, in which the Moslem militants seem to overpower the police who seem to plead with them rather than issue them commands, and to retreat before them rather than hold their ground:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Uu8U-EyCxY

Reflect, after watching this video, that the British élites not only want these Moslems in the country but want increasing numbers of them, and angrily refuse to give assurances that their desire for ever more and more of them will stop before whites will no longer exist in Britain.  How do we know the élites want more and more and more of these Moslem extremists to come to Britain?  By the extremely hysterical and aggressive ways in which they react to any questioning of this:  they react instantly with overpowering force and threats to fine or jail you. 

If you want something really badly you’ll have an exaggerated reaction against someone who seems to oppose it, while if you have no preference one way or another you’ll react with calm disinterested detachment rather than with hysteria and overly aggressive threats and actions. 

So, by the way the élites react to any questioning of it we know they very badly want it although they don’t actually come out and admit that.  They’re afraid if they admitted it, it would thwart its going to completion, because then enemies of the plan would have ammunition against it wherewith to warn the people:  “It’s not true that it’s happening by itself:  it’s being done deliberately!”

We don’t know why the élites want it, because they aren’t explaining themselves, so we have to figure that out without their help.  Here goes:  a little reflection tells us that one reason must be they want low-wage, non-white workers who are docile in regard to the poor or unsafe workplace conditions they must endure in their home countries.  Workers like this would be very much cheaper than white workingmen. 

Another reason is the Jews are a big factor among the élites, especially in the United States (a country which, make no mistake, very heavily influences, in fact outright coerces, the rest of the Eurosphere from behind the scenes), and Jewish élites would welcome the race-replacement genocide of Eurochristians as a tribal vendetta, exactly as the Watusis in Rwanda would welcome the race-replacement genocide of the Hutus, the Serbians would welcome the race-replacement genocide of the Moslem Kosovars, the Greek Cypriots of the Turkish Cypriots, the Poles of the Germans, the Ulster Catholics of the Ulster Prods, and so on.  It’s a tribal thing:  Jews just don’t like Eurochristians.  They’d be delighted to see the last of them. 

Further reflection yields additional plausible reasons why the élites want the country literally filled to bursting with these Moslems and with other racial/ethnocultural incompatibles, and whites correspondingly driven out.  One thing seems clear in all this:  this replacement of the original population with these others is being strenuously and methodically imposed from the top down.  It’s not true that it’s happening because the people turned into liberals after the war, demanding as a result a huge influx of these others together with their own displacement and ultimate replacement and extinction.  The people didn’t suddenly “get liberal and demand that.” That’s not what happened.  What happened was the people were never explicitly consulted and never wanted it but it began being rammed down their throats anyway by the élites who simply announced that it was happening and that it would continue to happen, and anyone caught complaining would be harshly punished.  That’s it.  That’s how this all came about. 

Oh and don’t anyone dare to ask what the upper limit on it is, because there is no upper limit and anyone asking will be dealt with appropriately. 

The people never gave their consent to it, never got a chance to vote in a clearly-worded referendum, etc.  “Liberalism” isn’t the cause, the élites pursuing their narrow interests is the cause. 

European Jewry, who are part of the élites, recently went into hysterics as a result last month’s gains by the genocide-skeptic centrist parties across Europe:  Jewry’s umbrella organization put out a scathing statement calling the genocide-skeptic centrists vile names and demanding nothing be done to hinder ever greater immigration of Moslem militants into European countries, Moslem militants exactly as in that video, and furthermore calling for stiffer penalties for anyone caught questioning the present no-upper-limit Moslem influx into Europe.  Because these Moslem militants are known the world over for their anti-Jewish and anti-Israel views and activities, we see clearly, by organized Jewry’s insistence that ever more and more and more of them be let in, that Jews either want to be immersed in an ocean of anti-Semites or at least have nothing particularly against it.  So much for Ian Jobling’s theory that Jews are put off by “anti-Semitism.” They aren’t.  If they were, they’d be grateful for a halt to further Moslem militant influx instead of hysterically demanding it continue without any upper limit.  What’s happening as far as Jews are concerned (admittedly more of an issue in the States than in Europe since we have way more Jews) is very simple:  Jews hate and fear Eurochristians more than they hate and fear Moslem militants, and the rule is you polish off your main enemy first (knowing you can always take care of your secondary enemy later).  So no, Ian, they’re not terribly bothered by “anti-Semitism”:  the reason they aren’t flocking to your site in droves is they just don’t like stuff that strengthens Eurochristians, stuff like sane immigration policy.  They don’t like it.  This ain’t rocket science.  Do Hutus like stuff that strenghtens Watusis?  Do Kosovar Moslems like stuff that strengthens Serbians?  Do Greek Cypriots like stuff that strengthens Turkish Cypriots?  Do Ulster Catholics like stuff that strengthens Ulster Prods?  Well, Jews are no different:  they don’t like stuff that strengthens us.  (Of course in that case, Why are they permitted to get into our governments?  But that’s a whole other issue.)

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 04, 2009, 04:38 AM | #

Some comments in that Lionheart thread (
http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/2009/07/english-welsh-defence-league-london.html ):
______

[…] It really is not going to end happily ever after though is it? Britain today reminds me of a pressure cooker that has been left on the heat too long.  Nobody dares go near the lid but the longer it is ignored the bigger the mess will be when it blows up.  And let’s face it – it’s going to blow up.  We’re in dangerous times.
______

[…] The police should be reminded that they are servants of the people and that the people pay their bloody wages.  The hands-on handling of their own brethren, as opposed to the hands-off handling of the Muslim population, is rather cowardly of the lot of them.  [Scroob note:  clearly the police are afraid of the Moslems]
______

Has it ever dawned on any of you that your government is actually pro-Islamist?  This is what happens when people vote for pro-Islamic parties such as Labour.  England will be a battleground soon. […]
______

This should be shown all over the free (?) world.  It reminded me a bit of what is happening in Iran where ordinary people protesting in the streets are facing “unsympathetic” defenders of the law.  True, there was no overt violence on the part of the Metropolitan police FORCE (which was really out in FORCE to stamp down on this unarmed-civilians demonstration) but there is no doubt from the facial and body language of the police photographed, that they would have been more than willing to show a bit (or more!) of strong arming if they could have — something it seems they are very wary of doing when faced with raging, ranting, cursing, object-throwing, British flag-trampling (or burning!) Jihadists chasing them down London’s streets....!

Woe to those who seek to gag their own native people’s right to freedom of expression during perilous times.  The powers-that-be should not then be surprised if (or when...) things get out of hand from a subjugated & fearful, but also an increasingly “fed-up,” populace.
______

As football supporters, this type of oppressive herding of people, and getting aggressive if you don’t do as you are told, is old news.  As football fans you have no “human rights” and the same applies if you try to take your country back it seems.
______

Stopping the intake of workers from the Asian world and the African world would help to prevent violence on the streets.  [Scroob note:  but the élites currently in power will never stop that influx of Subcon and African workers.  Power has to be wrested from their grasp before that influx can be stopped (wrested legally and peacefully — I’m not calling for violence here — but wrested.  If violence breaks out, the people presently in charge are the ones who’ll be to blame with their decades of refusal to listen to valid pleas and entreaties).]
______

The “ordinary people” of Britain have been fed a poisonous cocktail of lies and deception designed to hide the facts of what is happening around them.  Listening to a comedy-show on BBC radio, I heard a famous comic read his script of clever Marxist pro-immigration, anti-British comments mocking another famous entertainer called Noel Edmunds, “mocking this very famous character for his new TV show on ITV, and then oh so cleverly they quoted him saying in an interview that Britain was like a bus that was full up, and mentioning the problems of supplying an ever growing population with energy and water, etc., and then the punch line came, “… full-up, except for bigots.”

This constant and seemingly irrelevant drip-feed of pro-Marxian Nu Labour propaganda would have been worthy of Dr. Goebbels in Nazi Germany.  Indeed, das BBC nurtures this Leftist Liberal poison and its perpetrators like a gardener tends his flowers.

The seeds of this garden of anti-British propaganda are the lethargic attitudes of the public.  As the housing market has faltered, it would seem that the only community with the cash to buy up houses at the moment comes predominantly from the Pakistani Moslem side of town.  It cannot be ignored that of the current sparse crop of “Sold” signs appearing in mainly white British streets in Luton, the new occupants, or the renters they have placed in them, are Moslem Pakistani.

Whole areas are once again under threat of being “bought out,” causing eventual “white flight” and within five to ten years another area will have its mosques and Islamic education centres while the churches and pubs all close down.

These are just observations of Luton; the same thing is happening throughout many parts of Europe.

The time will come when open tactics of repression are brought to bear on all those who seek to remain British and loyal to the Crown. […]
______

Apologies for bringing politics into this, but at the end of the day there is only one political party gaining enough momentum to defeat this islamification and having the neck to speak up about it, and that’s the BNP.  English Democrats are too far behind and I don’t agree with just being English — the UK needs to stick together on this, and that also includes the the Irish.
______

Well expressed article.  I particularly loathed this part of the article:

Then almost 2 hours after our police detention started on the streets of London, for exercising our human right of “freedom of assembly” within this our supposed democratic homeland, the Met police decided to take us through the police lines one by one and photograph us, take our personal details, and then interview us on police camera.  We were all then told that we had 1 hour (unless exceptional circumstances) to leave London and that we were not allowed to come anywhere within the M25 boundary for 24 hours or we would face arrest and detention.  All this for wanting to exercise our “legal right” to protest against Islamic extremists within Great Britain.  Some would say that we are now living in a Police State, based on our treatment.

First, neither you nor any of the protesters had done anything wrong.  It was your legal right to protest.  I would not have allowed them to take my name, my details or my picture as, again, I had committed no crime.  This is what people need to realise:  what their rights are.  There’s a good video by David Harris that explains all this here [see link in original text].  Our policeman have sadly, over the last 30/40 years, been indoctrinated not to follow Common Law but the government.  In the olden days they couldn’t have touched you, but the government wants every person ID’ed, tagged, DNA’ed, fingerprinted, all for one big super database.  Ironically, this is the hypocrisy of liberalism — they continue to harp on about freedom and liberty by taking away freedom and liberty.  The video is very interesting and is in five parts.  A must, for all to watch, about control within our society.

The fact, as well, you were all told to leave London and the M25 proves as well that the police are on the side of Islam, appeasing them.  They have moved you out so that you do not become a target for the Muslims, knowing were they to arrest them they’d riot and every Muslim group in the country would complain about police brutality and racism, so instead of looking for the Muslims who are causing the trouble, they remove those that may tempt them into violence.  At this rate it won’t be long down the line before they ban all non Muslims from leaving their houses, so as not to tempt the Muslims to riot.  This will be the day when houses become prisons and the criminals (Muslims) rule the streets with the protection of the Police force.

It’s going to get worse.  In fact it’s going to get a lot worse than people can possibly imagine.  The calls by people as well as myself to actively start removing Muslims from the UK back to their ancestral homes is for their ultimate protection.  As they become more brave, more and more Britons will say “enough is enough.” The police will come to protect the Muslims, who will then face the wrath of the overwhelming public and be utterly destroyed along with the Muslims too.  This is common sense.  We are seeing all the ingredients of revolution happening and I really hate to break it to the police and the Muslims, but those responsible for creating the anger of revolters throughout time have met with a deadly demise.  This post is not about inciting violence, it’s merely someone who’s learned history.  “Those who do not learn from history are destined to repeat the same mistakes.” The police and authorities would be well advised to remember that.
______

The fact as well you were all told to leave London and the M25 proves as well that the police are on the side of Islam, appeasing them.

The same aggressive policing techniques are employed against climate protesters at G8/G20 meetings.  The common thread is not Islam but the elites.  The police are protecting elites and their race-replacement proxies (immigrants).  The concentration on Islam is missing the point.

In these operations the police break Common Law and have used violence - the case of Ian Tomlinson being the most difficult for them.

They have, therefore, well moved away from their function of upholding the law (which would require them to protect your right to protest) to one of enforcing the elite’s political programme.

They are police of the political state.

Now, this needs to be challenged.  Each element - the spying, the photographing, the banning order, the physical control - needs to be challenged, and explanations sought from the police and from the Home Office.

Make them defend their tactics.  Probe the limits of their legal powers.  Get these clarified.  Then contact the police in any area you are due to protest, tell them what their legal limits are and request details of their security operation.  Warn them that you would like to cooperate and lighten their load, but you place a very high value on the right of public protest, and you will sue for police action constricting that in any manner you deem unlawful. 

[Scroob note:  that last comment was posted over there by GW]

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 04, 2009, 05:02 AM | #

Desmond posts an explanation of “The Racial Golden Rule,” a racial Declaration of Independence (expressing the idea, Do unto other races as you would have other races do unto your race):

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/07/02/liberal-race-realism/#comment-14032

Posted by Bill on July 04, 2009, 05:59 AM | #

The more I dig into this pile of **** the more I get confused, so much so my political compass just keeps spinning like a top.

Here’s a few thoughts, in no particular order as they say.

It is said that since the end of the Soviet Union in 1989 ‘ish, the terms left and right became obsolete, as Francic Fukuyama declared, it was the end of history.

I don’t buy that, I think there is such a thing as right and left but maybe it’s become more of a pick’n mix thing.  Essentially there is fundamentally such a thing as a leftist and a rightist conservative way of thinking, I think it’s genetic or whatever.

I mentioned in a recent post, that when I first started out, I confronted myself with the question of who is facilitating mass immigration?  I was sure of one thing, and that was the capitalist bosses were cool with the idea, as they didn’t give a damn about the colour of the money they were raking in - other than that - I was left floundering.

Then I learned of of the phenomena of Liberal guilt, which took some digesting.

Then I learned of what has become known as the Unholy Alliance between liberals and Islam.

Then I learned about neoConservatism and how they were not conservative at all but something called Straussists or Trotskyites.

Then I learned of postmodernism and non judgementalism, relativism, oppressors and victim hood, the culture war and the whole gamut of the ‘60’s counterculture, the new left, the EU, the New World Order, the Holocaust, Hitler, Fascism, the Media, the Bankers, Traitorous Politicians.  And so it goes on and on and on.

Just as thought I’d got it, something else appeared and it was back to the drawing board, I used to do a line dance called one step forward two steps back - how appropriate.

I know I’ve left lots of stuff out but please don’t tell me about it.

I suppose when all of this is distilled and the kaleidoscope settles, the bottom line is the white race is under mortal threat, and that’s all we need to know - all else is secondary. (or is it?)

What doesn’t add up is the police, (and all the other useful idiots) even if they are all hard core leftists surely they can see that the process of replacing them has already begun, same with Civil Servants, the Military, Town Hall Jobsworths, Social Workers, Judges, in fact all the long march usurpers are in turn, being replaced.  The term the Invasion of the Body Snatchers is so apt here.

Who will be the last man standing?

Thinking about it, is it any wonder that the average soap viewer doesn’t get any of this, in fact it’s a wonder anybody does.

Footnote.  As usual I’m in a hurry, consequently, I meander and veer off my intended path, thereby leaving out stuff I feel is important.  Never mind there’s always another post.

Posted by Dasein on July 04, 2009, 10:43 AM | #

So much for Ian Jobling’s theory that Jews are put off by “anti-Semitism.” They aren’t.  If they were, they’d be grateful for a halt to further Moslem militant influx instead of hysterically demanding it continue without any upper limit.  What’s happening as far as Jews are concerned (admittedly more of an issue in the States than in Europe since we have way more Jews) is very simple:  Jews hate and fear Eurochristians more than they hate and fear Moslem militants, and the rule is you polish off your main enemy first (knowing you can always take care of your secondary enemy later).  So no, Ian, they’re not terribly bothered by “anti-Semitism”:  the reason they aren’t flocking to your site in droves is they just don’t like stuff that strengthens Eurochristians, stuff like sane immigration policy.  They don’t like it.

Does Jobling have a theory as to why Jewish organizations are so opposed to anyone who would keep Third Worlder out of their country?  His criticism of MacDonald, as far as I have seen, is on issues that don’t really affect his central thesis.  Jobling’s big thing is to deny that Jews are hyper-ethnocentric.  But this is not crucial to MacDonald’s theory.  Even if their mean ethnocentrism is the same as other groups, they could have more variability, meaning that the tail ends would more densely populated than in other groups.  Furthermore, MacDonald’s theory of Jewish influence as outlined in CoC does not depend on Jews as a group being ethnocentric.  It’s enough that these people and movements he described were acting in what they perceived to be the interest of Jews.  A group evolutionary strategy does not require any sort of uniform distribution of traits that make the group strategy adaptive.

Posted by Dasein on July 04, 2009, 10:48 AM | #

Jobling also thinks there is absolutely no genetic basis for ethnocentrism.  He takes a completely environmentalist perspective on this.  He is ignoring all the research on implicit attitudes.  Jobling is very selective in what bits of science he’s willing to accept.

Posted by Dasein on July 04, 2009, 10:55 AM | #

As for whether Jews on average are hyper-ethnocentric, I suspect that they are.  I have not looked at the psychological literature and I don’t know how easily such a thing can be measured (i.e. what sorts of tests exist), but the most powerful organized ethnic interest groups are Jewish.

Posted by English Defence League on July 04, 2009, 11:32 AM | #

Nice to see we are so popular! Re fred, We dont need to expand past anti islamic protests as this is the reason we have been formed, That is the threat as we see it and that is what we are protesting against, Militant islam operating in our country, If our SCUM government done their job there would be no need for us to exist, Today there is two protests, I see you have only discussed our birmingham protest, The one in london maybe of more interest to you as we are protesting direct at anjem choudarys hate roadshow, Lets see how they react to finally being challenged ey!

Regards…

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 04, 2009, 01:42 PM | #

“Re fred, We dont need to expand past anti islamic protests as this is the reason we have been formed, That is the threat as we see it” (—English Defence League)

It’s not the threat (or not the sole threat) as the Englishmen who used to live in race-replaced Nonwhitechapel see it but all right, you’ve chosen your battleground and good luck to you, godspeed, stay out of trouble as best you can, come back safe and sound from each “encounter” and “live to fight another day” until this cancer be cut out and sent back where it came from.  God bless!

Posted by Bill on July 04, 2009, 09:06 PM | #

“Before I sign off I have had unconfirmed reports of hundreds of Asians rioting in Birmingham but I doubt that has much to do with Caspian terns although in Britain nowadays who knows?”

Simon Darby (Deputy Leader BNP) blog 4th July 2009.

Nothing to do with this I wonder?

The English Defence League march in Birmingham, 4th July 2009

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 05, 2009, 12:00 AM | #

”Jewry’s umbrella organization put out a scathing statement calling the genocide-skeptic centrists vile names and […] calling for stiffer penalties” (—from my comment)

Here’s the citation,

http://www.islamineurope.net/2009/06/european-jewish-congress-frets.html

(which I also referred to here,

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/european_heritage/#c76969 ).

Posted by Guessedworker on July 05, 2009, 12:13 AM | #

Bill,

I can’t find any report of this Asian riot in Brom.  Did find an article on a Civitas investigation of Sharia, though:

http://www.sundaymercury.net/news/midlands-news/2009/07/05/islamic-sharia-law-courts-operating-in-west-midlands-66331-24075255/

There is supposed to have been only two Sharia courts operating in the Midlands.  Civitas found eighty-five!

What these people have to riot about God alone knows.  They seem to be getting everything they want.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on July 05, 2009, 02:52 AM | #

NORTHWEST BNP FLEXES ITS NEW-FOUND MUSCLES

July 3, 2009 by BNP News

The British National Party is hard at work building its organisation in the Northwest following its electoral success in the region, reports regional organiser Clive Jefferson.

“I have appointed four new organisers this week alone,” Mr Jefferson said.  “We have a big regional council meeting approaching and it is becoming very clear that far from being exhausted and in need of rest our activists and officials are chomping at the bit,” he said.

The historic breakthrough in the European elections was a huge leap forward and far greater than the party anticipated, he continued.  […]

“These are exciting times. […] We intend to have multiple bases in the Northwest for our constituency work.  These bases will revolutionise our operations in the north of England.”

Mr Jefferson said the biggest eye-opener of recent developments had been the realisation of precisely how much a David and Goliath struggle the BNP had engaged in against the old gang parties.

“As we see exactly what goes into setting up one MEP constituency office, we have realised that the old parties had 78 of these MEP support structures and in excess of 600 MP offices and support staff to range against us,” he said.

“In addition, they have council offices and associated staff and all the finance and resources which comes with these posts.  In spite of all of that, we have been taking them on.  They have been able to put a miniature army of MPs, MEPs their parliamentary secretaries, district and county councillors, bussed in from all over the place to fight us, a group of volunteers driven only by a love of our country.

“In spite of that, the game has changed.  Everything was poured into the Northwest to stop us, and they failed.  Now they never will.  The battle has been fought and we have won.  Minor skirmishes will, of course, take place but never again will the extremist left be able to mount such a sustained and expensive assault on democracy,” Mr Jefferson said.

“Our time has come, and from here, we build.  Watch out for exciting news from the Northwest over the next few weeks.”

[ http://bnp.org.uk/2009/07/north-west-bnp-flexes-its-new-found-muscles/ ]

Question:  we know that Labour and the Tories after them are going to start deliberately packing the areas where the BNP have won seats with non-white immigrants so they’ll lose the next election.  Can anything be done about that?

Posted by Dasein on July 07, 2009, 08:23 AM | #

Benn also points out, with the smugness of a Leftie explaining why they love living in Brixton, “My political heroes are Ghandi, Mandela and Tutu, none of them European and none of them white.” What do you want – a round of applause?

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100002292/tony-benn-is-a-silly-old-extremist-and-totally-wrong-about-winston-churchill/

Posted by Q on July 07, 2009, 11:10 PM | #

Ye another example of loony liberal-mental-disorderdism protecting the “Religion Of Peace.” In this instance its of the “happy/gay” variety:

Liberal gays are scared to tell the truth about Muslim homophobia

By Peter Whittle UK Last updated: July 6th, 2009

14 Comments Comment on this article

Over the past week there’s been a scrap going on between the political parties as to who is the gay-friendlier. Interesting to gays probably, very boring for everyone else. But there is one aspect to all of this which still goes largely ignored - for reasons, no doubt, of “cultural sensitivity” - and that is the effect that the long march of multiculturalism has had on this whole issue. Basically it comes down to this question: how do you celebrate and respect cultures and religions which think you are an abomination?

It’s a tricky one for the bien pensants and their political spokesman. I had the chance to find out quite how tricky when I went to a political event last week organised by the gay networking group Jake at the National Portrait Gallery, held to mark the opening of its Gay Icons exhibition (an odd collection, this. Madonna sure. But Nelson Mandela?). Nicholas Boles and Nick Herbert for the Tories and Ben Bradshaw and Chris Bryant for Labour (plus some anonymous bloke from the Lib Dems) vied with each other for the votes of an audience of 150 or so gay men.

When question time came around, I made the point to the panel that a recent survey by Policy Exchange had showed that 72 per cent of young Muslim men thought that homosexuality should be recriminalised. As the Channel 4 Dispatches programme on Mosques showed last year, there are some pretty disturbing things being said by some Imans about what is best for gays, ie death. Given the rapidly increasing proportion of the population which is Muslim, did they not think that there might be some possible problem in the future?

Needless to say this was neatly side-stepped. Or should I say, not really answered at all. Nick Herbert made the point that we should be careful not to generalise about the whole Muslim population (72 per cent seems pretty general to me). Immediately the issue was turned into something else, in a way we’re all too familiar with, which is how important it is not to demonise Islam.

There are major double standards going on here. I’m not remotely religious, but I can see how it’s considered perfectly legitimate to demonise the whole of the Catholic Church, say, or even Christianity in general. But when it comes to Islam, everybody gets very tongue-tied.

The reason is clear: the old liberal narrative insisted that all minorities had things in common. They were all united in a rainbow coalition in opposition to what the Americans call “The Man”. They were all victims. Multiculturalism has exposed this as a bit of a lie. But it will take a long time for the liberal elites to admit to it. Hence the disgraceful silence of Western feminists on the treatment of women in Islamic countries. And hence the depressing mealy-mouthedness at the Portrait Gallery last week.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peterwhittle/100002250/liberal-gays-are-scared-to-tell-the-truth-about-muslim-homophobia/

Posted by Iceman / Daryl on July 08, 2009, 07:14 AM | #

Our people really need to learn how to make professional looking propaganda videos.

I advise everyone here to LEARN CINELERRA, a powerful video editing tool used by hollywood. It’s free. Create propaganda videos with this tool. They will look a thousand times more professionaler than anything you can get with Windows Media Player (i.e. windows SHIT creater).

BTW check out my website freemediaproductions.info—geniuses are alloud to enter only. No scum.

Posted by Scum on July 08, 2009, 10:19 AM | #

professionaler

alloud

?

Posted by frank on August 08, 2009, 06:53 PM | #

why do we live in a country that gives no rites to a english man and whats worse no identity if our so called goverment that is run by a scotsman and teaches us to respect other cultures and does not give us the right to teach ours and the right to freedom of speech which is taken away from us and all the english men that died in the secound world have been sold out by a goverment who has sold them out and us for a country who cares more for immigrant workers than thier own people i work on the olympic park site and i have seen the way english workers are treated and how the foriegn workers are taken on and the english are ushered out the back door for the foriegn worker to start the goverment tell us thier is a shortage of english workers i say bollocks it makes me sick to my stomach and confussed about my background and my future we need a goverment that speaks for the people and is at one with the people and is trully english

Posted by scaramange on August 09, 2009, 11:55 PM | #

Posted by Scaramange on August 09, 2009, 11:58 PM | #

Blog,Print/Billpost/Share

http://yfrog.com/2rjokerevcj

have a nice day

Posted by Birmingham Tickets on September 21, 2009, 04:08 PM | #

Thanks for this. I got the link from a comment you left at another site and found it to be a great compilation of the story thus far. Here’s praying for the integrity of the trade.