![]() | |
The Human Ecology of SunburnsOn a whim, I grabbed some stats on sunburns by State and ran them through my ecological correlator at LaboratoryOfTheStates.com to see what popped out. As one might predict, Nordic human ecologies are the top predictors of sunburn and black human ecologies are the top predictors of the absence of sunburns. But, get this—among the highest attributes of human ecologies experiencing sunburns is high IQ. Now, I’m sure the groveling James Watson will admonish me to abandon my fool-hardy quest for the data regarding IQ and SKIN COLOR as an indulgence in the shallow, pseudo-intellectual ecological fallacy, but it does say something that the inbred six-fingered bigots would have predicted this.
Posted by James Bowery on Monday, November 5, 2007 at 02:18 AM in Comments:Posted by dfssdfsfd on November 07, 2007, 11:23 PM | # Were you using the state IQ data as an indicator here? Really, why even drum this up? Even if that link SOMEHOW existed, skin color would work as an indicator of high IQ. It wouldn’t be a reversal. Posted by James Bowery on November 08, 2007, 12:10 AM | # I don’t understand what you’re getting at. What do you mean “reversal”? Ecological correlations are just that. They can be interpreted in a variety of ways as can correlations on individuals. The way we interpret them depends a lot on what is called our “Bayesian prior”—or our working hypothesis (or hypotheses as the case may be). The big problem, of course, is that some people with certain working hypotheses, anti-racism for instance, grab control of the government and impose their hypotheses on others who hold differing beliefs. This is known as “theocracy” and it results in things like Hundred Years Wars when trigger technologies like the Gutenberg Press (or—oh—I don’t know—let’s say something like the “Internet") comes along to wrest control of ideas from the central authorities. Posted by fsdsdfdg on November 08, 2007, 03:40 AM | # I mean reversal by the idea skin color being the causational agent for intelligence. That, of course, is insanity. But, I just realized I misread this, so forget it- though I know you wern’t pushing this off as a serious idea. “The big problem, of course, is that some people with certain working hypotheses, anti-racism for instance, grab control of the government and impose their hypotheses on others who hold differing beliefs.” The same thing has, and still does happen with racialism. Posted by dfgdfgdg on November 08, 2007, 03:42 AM | # And again, what IQ data were you using here? Posted by vxcdffdgdf on November 08, 2007, 03:44 AM | # Ah, it was that recent state IQ data. Just forget I’ve said anything. Posted by James Bowery on November 08, 2007, 08:22 AM | # Yes it is true that the supposedly “anti-racist” laws being enforced are, indeed, “racist”. Ethnic minorities have the right to form exclusive ethnic enclaves but if whites try to do it, all of a sudden the government leaps into action with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Moreover, due to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, there are more and more privileged racial minorities enjoying the benefits of these laws the moment the step foot on US soil. Next entry: The Real Reason Ron Paul Supporters Hate the Old Media So Much Previous entry: Hubbert, Yom Kippur, neocons and Iraq. |
|
Existential IssuesOf noteRecent CommentsGuessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 10:37 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:59 PM. (go) (view) Desmond Jones commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 09:06 PM. (go) (view) Raymond Bradly commented in entry 'Jews: jewish hand-wringing at recent high' on 09/02/10, 09:02 PM. (go) (view) James Bowery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:45 PM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:14 PM. (go) (view) PF commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 06:32 PM. (go) (view) PF commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:28 PM. (go) (view) John commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 03:30 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:42 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:31 PM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 02:22 PM. (go) (view) Buzz Killer commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 02:13 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:04 PM. (go) (view) GoyAmongYou commented in entry 'I nose who you are' on 09/02/10, 02:01 PM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 01:56 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:52 PM. (go) (view) Al Birah commented in entry 'Are Jews White?' on 09/02/10, 01:42 PM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 01:39 PM. (go) (view) danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:48 PM. (go) (view) danielj commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:45 PM. (go) (view) qwery commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 12:43 PM. (go) (view) Mark Dawson commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:35 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 10:27 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'None dare call it White genocide' on 09/02/10, 09:58 AM. (go) (view) Leon Haller commented in entry 'Machete Ex Machina' on 09/02/10, 09:09 AM. (go) (view) Guessedworker commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:19 AM. (go) (view) Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 08:02 AM. (go) (view) Grimoire commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 06:19 AM. (go) (view) Randy Garver commented in entry 'If at first you don't succeed' on 09/02/10, 04:28 AM. (go) (view) Notus Wind commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:56 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:28 AM. (go) (view) Thorn commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 03:18 AM. (go) (view) uh commented in entry 'The Ontology of Mind: The Gödelian Argument' on 09/02/10, 02:52 AM. (go) (view) Recent Posts
General NewsScience NewsScience CategoriesAll CategoriesThe WritersEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages. LinksEndorsement not implied. Crime General
Immigration
Islam Jews
Nationalist Political Parties
New Right Science Whites in Africa | |