THE JEWISH SPIRIT AND THE CUBE OF EONS

It is quite counterintuitive, but it is historically accurate, to say that Christianity has largely became a non-Jewish movement. In its inception it was Jewish. But its been transfered to other nationalities and rejected by modern Jews.

A similar statement could be made about Marxism.

I can’t understand it, is what it boils down to.  Symbolism too abstract.

Constantin, you’re a smart guy.  You’ve got to lighten up on the abstract and get more down-to-earth.  No matter how smart a guy is, if he doesn’t make himself understood he won’t contribute to advancing the debate.

Regarding Al Ross’ noting CvH’s affiliation with “Jewish nationalists”:  it would be wonderful if Jewish nationalism didn’t motivate Jewish nationalists to destroy Euro society via the following typically Jewish behaviors:

Jews laud homosexuals who push the homosexualist agenda (as opposed to discreet homos who live their lives privately without parading before society at large what society at large doesn’t want paraded before its face constantly) because that agenda overturns Euro society, a society Jews hate for the reason that it excludes them, they feel (the wise Jews realize it doesn’t exlude them if they come to a few simple, harmless accommodations with it and refrain from trying to destroy it, but few Jews are wise).  Diaspora Jewry feels toward Euro society what Hesbollah feels toward Israeli society:  hates it with a passion and wants it done away with.  The well-known Jewish attraction to universal societal poisons such as homosexualism, marxism, multiculti, open borders for Euros (closed ones for Israel), race-denial, women’s lib, Negroes, Puerto Ricans, race-replacement, Euro-Negro miscegenation, and so forth, isn’t a principled attraction of course but the attraction a fighter feels for a weapon wherewith to smite his enemies.  Jewish attraction to these things is none other than Jewish nationalism.

The Jewish neocons are expressing oppostion to affirmative action indirectly, though their mouthpiece, Juan McInsanio.  AA must be starting to seriously eat into Jewish jobs, Jewish promotions, etc.

Doubt it, since the Jews could end AA anytime, that being a cinch since the masses mostly favor ending it. McCain’s probably lying just like that 1979 proto-neocon candidate Reagan said he’d end AA.

Great to have you back, 2R.  I was almost going to bid you “Welcome home!,” but ... is this still our home?  It sort of is and sort of isn’t. 

Anyway, your essay is eagerly awaited, to put it mildly!  Latvia is a country that interests me quite a bit (Lithuania too) — I hope you’ll include it in your assessment.

Lurker makes an excellent point:  the Jewish neocons who control both Jorge Arbusto and Juan el Loco could end AA any time they wanted.  Maybe the particular Jewish neocons who totally control Juan are a splinter faction that wants to end it?

Notice that in this country you get your choice of which Jewish-controlled candidate to vote for, Juan el Loco or The Magic Negro, to succeed the current Jewish-controlled president:  no matter whom you vote for, no candidate will serve Euro interests in the future as president (which will be merely a continuation of the current eight-year-long status quo of one-hundred-percent opposition to Euro interests).  As I saw someone write recently, there can scarcely be a greater condemnation of “democrazy” than that.

If “the democratic process” can be partly defined as ”something the Jews effortlessly take over and totally control in the service of their narrow interests the minute they exert themselves and have the numbers to pull it off”( * ), obviously democracy in its present form, democrazy, has to go.  Democracy was great while it lasted but if it’s going to mean total Jewish victory in the Jewish tribal war against Euros that Euros don’t even know is being waged, the vanquished to undergo genocide except for a supply of blonde Euro shiksas kept around to sexually service drooling Jews either directly or by performing with Negro men in front of sexually-perverted Jewish voyeurs, democracy has to go and something else brought in to replace it.  Israel’s and the former South Africa’s set-ups ("the Good South Africa,” think of it as), amounting to applications of the national-socialist apartheit idea, are one way to go.  There are others.  Ultimately Jews will have to be asked to leave Euro nations, as they’ve shown time and again they can’t keep from trying to destroy those nations as soon as they’re able.  To ever trust them again would be insanity.
______

( * Jewish ethnocentrism, skill at trickster wordgames, and sheer love of lucre surpassing Euros many tenfold, a mere two or three percent of the Euro population already gives them the numbers to pull if off.)

(All the criticism of Jews in this thread is gonna singlehandedly assure the next few mortgage payments on Constantin’s Maalox supplier’s dacha.)

The problem with democracy, Fred, is OMOV.  There are many moral bases for restricting and distributing additional votes in the electorate.

I should say that there is no way to prevent democracy from involving into an elective dictatorship.  But one can choose one’s dictator.  For example, social conservatism can be advantaged by distributing an additional vote for marriage, or for property or business ownership.  By favouring certain responsible or enterprising choices, responsibility and enterprise can themselves be favoured.

A perfectly moral and necessary basis for electoral advantage would be membership on both sides of one’s family line of the native ethny.

It may be necessary for these additional votes to be opt-ins.  The citizen (or subject in the English case) would have to present his or herself before a local registrar and make his claim.  No claim no gain.

Fred says, “Democracy was great while it lasted but if it’s going to mean total Jewish victory in the Jewish tribal war against Euros that Euros don’t even know is being waged...”

Brilliant and to the point. For some reason, democracy is a form of government easily infiltrated by Semitic peoples who get us to pay for special food certification (kosher) or who will get us to pay for spcial food certification when numerous enough (haalal).

Obviously we need to study leadership and governance. We recommend a combination of elements from the Icelanic Thing, the Venetian Senate, and the Mormon Church.

Pope and Cardinals? Not so much. They are subject to intimidation, smear, and College packing.

http://thebirdman.org/Index/Temp/Temp-BirdmansWeeklyLetter.html

Birdman’s Weekly Letter #494:
Final Solution to the Washington Question
By John “Birdman” Bryant

Date: August 19, 2008

Final Solution to the Washington Question

Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable. --John F Kennedy

The tree of liberty is nourished by the blood of patriots and tyrants. That is its natural manure. --Thomas Jefferson

Introductory comment: I have been trying to write the present essay for some time. It is written as a sort of supplement to an earlier essay, The Militia Solution, currently posted in the Our Fight section of my website, http://www.thebirdman.org, which was intended to address the question of how it is possible to stop the outrageous abuses of the government in Washington which have been going on for some years and which are rapidly bringing the American nation to an end. The conclusion of that essay was that the only way to do this would likely involve violence, and that patriots should organize into militias to attain the skills and the contacts that would make violent action possible should it become necessary. Unfortunately, The Militia Solution omitted consideration of certain important questions, and perhaps for this reason did not produce any detectable reaction of the type I had hoped for. Accordingly, I have decided to revisit the issue at hand in hopes of providing better guidance for what I believe must be done if this nation is to survive in any form resembling what the Founders intended, particularly because at the time of this writing we appear to be on the brink of war, and the claim of ‘necessity’ produced by wartime conditions is just the excuse which the government needs—and likely will use—to fasten the final fetters of totalitarianism onto its citizens, and especially onto dissenters such as myself. As Doctor Johnson so famously remarked, “When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully.”

To begin, let us look at where we stand now.

* We have a war going in Iraq and Afghanistan that the overwhelming majority of Americans don’t want, and which resulted in a change from Republican to Democrat majorities in the Congress during the last election, and yet the war rages on, bankrupting our country, killing and poisoning our soldiers, polluting the planet with ‘depleted’ uranium, and—if that is not enuf—our so-called ‘leaders’ are sporting for another war in Iran.

* We have Mexicans and who-knows-what-else pouring over our southern border, taking American jobs, raising the crime rates, sucking up health, welfare, educational and other government benefits, and coming just this close to qualifying for Social Security benefits even tho they are in this country illegally and have contributed little or nothing to its coffers, all while declaring that they are taking back ‘their’ land under the banner of ‘Aztlan’.

* We have inflation running at double-digit levels (altho the government is trying to hide this via non-publication of M3 and manipulation of COLA calculations), with interest rates held at virtually nothing, all of which will inevitably eat up Americans’ savings and destroy the middle class.

* We have a Social Security ‘trust fund’ which is supposed to be money that is set aside for retirees, but which has simply been taken from current wage-earners and placed in the government’s general fund to be spent for current projects. The result of this is that the government now possesses a huge unfunded obligation to retirees which it will never be able to fulfill—a fact which does not keep it from continuing to demand social security payments from all wage-earners to fund this Ponzi scheme. Only the self-employed have had the luxury of opting out of the SS system; but this option is proving worthless as inflation (see above) eats up workers’ savings.

* We have a ‘free trade’ policy which has led to the ‘offshoring’ of American jobs into the oblivion of the Giant Sucking Sound which Ross Perot predicted—especially manufacturing jobs which have been the core of the American economy—and this has resulted in the rapid degeneration of the economic landscape and the pushing of America toward Turd-World status, to say nothing of the loss of skills which those often-highly-technical jobs implied, and the loss of the equipment which those jobs required.

* We have a recently-burst housing bubble, precipitated by the government’s ‘easy money’ policy (artificially low interest rates—see above) combined with lowered credit standards, whose intention—at least by liberal theory—was to make home ownership readily available for ‘the poor’ (ie, negroes and other minority trash), but whose effect was to create a rising inflationary spiral of housing prices combined with a tsunami of worthless mortgages (from the lowered credit standards, combined with the offshoring of the economy—see above) which were ‘repackaged’ and sold off to investors—mostly banks—as high-grade investment vehicles, thus bringing banks and other institutional investors to bankruptcy or near-bankruptcy, and threatening the stability of the entire financial system.

* We have a monetary system which is called the Federal Reserve, but which was established by and is currently owned by Jews—the Rothschilds and their friends—and which has drained off huge amounts of the nation’s wealth into its private coffers since Paul Warburg (depicted as “Daddy Warbucks” in the cartoon strip “Little Orphan Annie") and his European banker friends frightened the nation into believing it was necessary by deliberately creating the Panic of 1907. The stealing of America’s wealth by the FED, as it is familiarly called, has occurred by two basic means. The first is by the government’s payment of huge amounts of interest to the FED for its ‘service’ of ‘issuing’ currency—currency which is actually printed by the Treasury Department’s Bureau of Engraving and Printing—when in fact the government has not the least need of the FED, and could easily issue its own interest-free and debt-free currency. The second way in which the FED has drained off American wealth is by the deliberate creation of recessions and depressions, including the Great Depression, where, by means of restricting the volume of currency, the FED threw hundreds of thousands of farmers and others into bankruptcy and took possesson of their property at fire-sale prices. A national bank for America, which the FED effectively is, was warned against in no uncertain terms by Jefferson, was the cause of the War of 1812, was killed temporarily by Jackson in 1836 at the price of near-assassination, was temporarily bypassed by Lincoln to no avail, was denounced by such perceptive individuals as Louis McFadden, Charles Lindbergh Sr and Henry Ford in the 20th century, and yet survives today behind its mask of ‘government agency’, just as deadly as when Jackson referred to it as ‘a den of vipers’.

* Our ‘leaders’ have made a secret treaty—the Security and Prosperity Partnership—in which America is to be merged with Canada and Mexico. The existence of this treaty has been denied by Administration officials, but has been documented on official websites. Such a treaty would never be approved by the American people, and in any event could only be implemented with the ‘advice and consent’ of the Senate; and yet the plans for merging the three countries continues apace into a one-world (ie, one-world government) future where international communism and international capitalism become the tools by which the wealthy elites assume totalitarian power, and the freedom to which America has given birth, and which has provided a beacon of inspiration to the rest of the world, is finally and completely extinguished in the rise of the so-called New World Order (NWO).

* We have a War on Terror which is not only fake, but is one in which most serious students of the subject agree that the government was complicit, the apparent reason being to use the fear of ‘Ay-rab terrists’ as an excuse for fixing on the American population the fetters of NWO totalitarianism.

* We have a War on Drugs whose purpose seems mainly to reduce competition for the world’s most prominent Drug Kingpin, the CIA, all while helping to usher in the NWO’s totalitarian police state.

* We have racial preferences for negroes and other higgledy minorities which are intended to inflame racial conflict with whites and thereby justify more Police Stateism.

* We have ‘hate speech’ laws which are intended as the fine edge of the wedge to make politically incorrect thoughts into crimes, thereby achieving yet more control over the American population, all while stamping out the information that patriots need to identify and throw off their oppressors.

* Within the last year or so we have had a series of enormously abusive legislative and executive acts foisted upon us, including the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, the rescinding of Posse Comitatus, and the countenancing of torture, not to mention the practice of ‘signing statements’ by means of which the President effectually places his own interpretation on legislation which may have little or no relation to the original intent of Congress.

* We have a very clear Second Amendment which permits the possession and carrying of weapons,
and we have millions of citizens who own guns, and are thus in some sense well-prepared to resist government tyranny; but on the other hand, we have suffered an unending series of attempts to neutralize that Second Amendment, from efforts to get the Supreme Court to declare it a ‘collective’ right, and hence not an individual one, to escalating attempts to impede gun sales, illegalize ammunition, and confiscate legal firearms. Indeed, the Supreme Court’s recent Heller decision upholding the right of the individual to keep and bear arms was achieved with only a 5-4 majority, and this means that if there is another test of this essential right with but one new liberal appointment to the Court, this would almost certainly spell the end of the Second Amendment. What is worse, however, is the manipulation of people’s thoughts thru the Jew-controlled mass media and educational establishment, in which gun owners are demonized, gun control is lauded, and students from the publik skoolz are dumbed down to such a degree that they do not know and cannot appreciate American history and the fact that guns were an essential part of that history. In fact, most people are so dumbed down that, as several commentators have noted and news stories have actually reported, the Constitution and Bill of Rights are likely to be regarded as subversive literature.

* We have in the order of 600 gulags around the country with a capacity of hundreds of thousands if not millions of internees. Is it really sensible to think that these prisons are intended for anyone except dissenters, who will be incarcerated just as soon as martial law is imposed?

* We have a President who took an oath which every President takes, to uphold and defend the Constitution, but who, in an extraordinarily candid moment of truth, angrily referred to the Constitution as ‘a God-damned piece of paper’.

* And above all, we have a Congress and a President who are dominated by a small but wealthy ethnic group—Jews—who are or have been the driving engine behind most of the above actions or policies, and who—by means of their money and other influence—will continue to dominate America and make this country a mere appendage of ‘that shitty little country’ Israel.

As many have noted, the pattern of abuses which we have listed above is that of chipping away at our freedoms so gradually that few will notice, and fewer still protest, until those freedoms are gone and we are caught in a totalitarian web that constrains our every move. This, indeed, is what the 19th century French writer Alexis de Tocqueville predicted as constituting the end of American freedom, tho he did not see it as totalitarian so much as simply bureaucratic—a word which so well describes the freedom-crimping so-called-democracies of Europe. As a general rule we are not taught about freedom, and especially we are not taught that freedom is like a muscle—it must be exercised or else it weakens and eventually withers away; and for this reason most people are not psychologically prepared to defend it. There is an irony here, however, because the liberals and leftists who are proponents of Big Government and its Big Brother facilitator gun control believe that the government will ‘wither away’—hence producing freedom—providing only that the government is in communist or socialist hands—when in fact it is the nature of Big Government, of which communism and socialism are prime examples, to pile law upon law, rule upon rule and regulation upon regulation until freedom is completely gone—hardly an act of withering away. The real problem, of course, is that nature abhors a vacuum, including a power vacuum, and this means that the ‘power vacuum’ of which freedom is composed has a tendency to be overtaken and replaced by government unless there is an active effort to retain that freedom. This, I believe, is what J Edgar Hoover meant when he said that freedom must be rewon by each generation; but in any event it is clear that government itself is the main threat to freedom. And since, as Lord Acton observed, power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, it follows that, as the power of government grows, not only does freedom decline, but it declines into a condition in which corruption becomes rampant. For those who love freedom, then, the best analogy of our situation is perhaps the proverbial frog in the pot: When a frog is put into hot water, it will jump out; but, so they say, when placed into cold water, it stays put, and will continue to stay put as the temperature is gradually raised, right up until the time that the frog’s goose is cooked.

Read the rest at link above.

The machinations of Hitler and the National Socialists as a ‘reaction formation’ response to the spiritual, unting void left by the faltering Christianity?

Christianity is meant bind all of mankind into the divine spiritual community of Christ; however, this universal oneness, in the spiritual, or divine sense, does not preclude people of European decent from pursuing their EGI.

Euro-Christians DO have a right to self defense. Mass immigration of non-Euros into European homelands will eventually lead to our genocide. Protecting our unique genotype from genocide via mass invasion/immigration falls under the category of self defence; therefore, it is an absolute moral imperative that we defend ourselves.

The idea that people of European decent have to self-sacrifice their race via mass immigration of alien gene pools into our homelands (all for the “betterment of mankind,” don’tcha know?), is borne out of secular philosophies such as modern-liberalism, postmodernism and multiculturalism.

From my layman POV, I say: Many Church leaders in Rome, and elsewhere, have done great damage to the reputation/authenticity of Christianity when they decided to conflate popular secular philosophical belief systems with the traditional teachings of the Catholic Church.

The EGI metric itself is in a unified space of genetic distance.  Our relations are all relative as relatives.

Christians believe what churches tell them.  Churches ignore race to avoid theological problems and preserve their 501c3 tax status.  The theological problems are directly related to Christianity’s competitiveness with other universal belief systems - humanism, for example.

The Christian transcends reality through his “personal relationship with Jesus Christ, in whom all men are one.” Secret knowledge.  The nature of this relationship goes a long way toward mending the division between the corporeal and the spiritual.  Reality takes on the appearance of a hologram.  Oftentimes in the old corporeal world, Christ-like thoughts and behavior looked staged or indicated mental illness.  In a hologram, the Christ-like thoughts and behavior of believers can affect change.

The humanist transcends reality by thinking … action at a distance, energy and mass is one … good thoughts.  Observations dis-confirming his belief system are ignored.  Ignored?  Well, not entirely.  The correct word is transcended.  The humanist transcends and remakes reality.

I am shocked - shocked, I tell you - to learn that the Church doesn’t represent authority, the media doesn’t reinforce Church teachings on race, and Christians are Christian for only one hour each week.

Why thank you, Dave Johns!

Millions of White Christians already have essentially adopted the microcommunity strategy.  They want their children to have as little to do with the system as possible.  Like it or not, they are the primary pool of people that you have to work with.  The trick is to get them to come into the light: implicitly racialist --> explicitly racialist.  Somehow I doubt the ‘Christard’ meme will win many friends.

Captain,

I completely agree with you about the Christard meme.  However, I see no resolution between the reality of race and Christian/Humanist holograms.  Holograms require nothing more than facilitators, pews, lotus positions, hand-holding, and “nice thoughts” to ignore/transcend reality.  Xtian apologetics, like that done by the folks over at Original Dissent, is far too intellectual for the average Christian.  A bigger problem is the 501c3 tax status of churches:  Going against government policy is a fast way to lose it.  In my opinion, proponents of the Old Time Religion don’t have “the right stuff” to convince Easy Christians to forsake the hologram and lose the 501c3 tax status of their churches.

“...This should be done as part of a general overhaul of the faux “charity” rackets.”

Here’s a novel idea: How about abolishing the government/tax payer funded welfare-state; let private charities, funded by private individuals and organizations, take care of the needy. IMO, government does far more damage to our EGI than all the “faux charity rackets” combined.

Speculation from the lawn chair:

Under the present circumstances, one “out” for believers in the Old Time Religion could be a new take on God.  The suggestion is heresy, of course.  From a practical perspective, heresy’s true meaning is “bad for business.” Consider the fact that mainstream churches are heretical in the eyes of the Old Time Religion.  Why not return the favor with a Biblically-justified “heresy” that changes the nature of interactions within the hologram?  After all, we’re in a battle for race survival.  Must the creator be omnipotent?  Must the creator be omniscient?  Are these descriptions genuine?  If genuine, could they be relative to something else?  Could the creator err?  Could theologians responsible for interpretation err?  Early Greek new testament manuscripts were without periods and questions marks. Are we sure that our modern, English interpretations are correct?  How would the removal of periods change our understanding of the Ten Commandments?  Did God Incarnate really die for our sins or is this particular interpretation the spin of work-averse con artists looking to sell Christianity and rake in easy “tithes?”

Captainchaos counseled: 

Millions of White Christians already have essentially adopted the microcommunity strategy.  They want their children to have as little to do with the system as possible.  Like it or not, they are the primary pool of people that you have to work with.  The trick is to get them to come into the light: implicitly racialist --> explicitly racialist.  Somehow I doubt the ‘Christard’ meme will win many friends.

The captain speaks wisely, for I move among such people.  They are miles ahead of most of you in spirit and action, though they are not up on all the facts.  They are not openly combative and your aggression towards them just proves to them that they were right to withdraw and resist you in the first place.  Unless you have something better to offer, best to be nice and quiet.

How would the removal of periods change our understanding of the Ten Commandments?  Did God Incarnate really die for our sins or is this particular interpretation the spin of work-averse con artists looking to sell Christianity and rake in easy “tithes?”

Posted by GT on Friday, August 22, 2008 at 09:52 PM | #

How would the altering, ever so slightly, of the spectrum of genetic coding that is unique to ‘us’, to ‘our people’, that we share with no other, that constitutes our ‘self-hood’, alter our “understanding”, of said entity?  Well, that would depend upon ‘in what way’ and ‘to what degree’ it was altered.  It would be a question of how it was qualitatively and quantitatively different.  We could measure the quantitative differences between the new entity B versus its former manifestation A.  That would be an empirical matter; the quantitative.  What of the qualitative?  Why include that in the investigation?  Why does that matter at all?  What value does ‘value’ have when contrasted with the ‘real’, the fact?  Does the ‘real’ itself have ‘value’?  It seems that we WNs think so.  We grant legitimacy to loving qualia or subjective affection we have for our ‘people-hood’.  Don’t we?  Or else WTF are we spending our time here for?  Is our struggle not essentially one religious?  Food for thought.

If we dynamite one edifice why not another; and why would it matter if we did?

Food for thought.

“best to be nice and quiet” - Rusty

Immigrants-exploit-loophole-to-gain-British-citizenship-in-Church-of-England-marriages

I’m not so sure about the MUCH more aspect and this is because the oneworldism which is a strong driver of race-replacement has its origins in Christian precepts, viz., all men are equal in the eyes of God and so, by extension, the inane belief in racial equality possesses, in the Christian’s eyes, the unqualified approbation of Heaven.

For Christ’s sake, how old are you?

For Christ’s sake, how old are you?

I’m old enough to recognised most of those whom comment here have the unifying characteristic of striving to preserve the genotype and phenotype of people of European decent. What I find repelling and frustrating are the atheists’ that are openly antagonistic towards those of us white-preservationists whom beleive Jesus is the Christ — the God that is revealed to us through The (Holy) Bible, the God that created the universe and all that is contained within it.

I do show respect for those, who for whatever reason, do not beleive in Christianity but are genuinely working for the preservation of our people. All I can ask of you, Al, is to a least accept the notion that it’s well within the realm of possibilities that mankind was created by a supernatural-entity.

We all have our opinions on the subject of how the universe came into existence; however they are just that—OPINIONS! Even Darwin had doubts about the validity of his own “Theory of Evolution.”

BTW, Al, you seem to be quite confident that the truths revealed in The (Holy) Bible are nothing but fairy-tales, so, I’d like to hear what your personal opinion is on how the universe and all that is contained within it came into existence?

To address your second point: If all struggles/belief systems are religious, are they equally valid?  What are we to think of Christians who love (the conventional interpretation of) God more than their people-hood?

Posted by GT on Sunday, August 24, 2008 at 05:01 PM

Life’s only ‘purpose’ is the propagation of itself.  No, ‘purpose’ doesn’t really capture it.  How about ‘function’?  Well, if by ‘function’ one means observed patterns of an entity’s behavior through time, okay.  Still, ‘function’ has the connotation of purposefulness.  How can we say that, for example, a component of a kiln is ‘malfunctioning’ or that a ‘malfunctioning’ component of a kiln is causing the whole kiln to ‘malfunction’ unless we have some ideal of how it ‘should’ (functioning ‘optimally’) be functioning?  I guess a kiln functions ‘optimally’ if it produces as much output as it possibly can with as little input as possible.  Can we apply the same standard to human beings? 

Lets say a mother has more or less figured out that her efforts to edify her children has reached a point of diminishing returns, she will henceforth put in that amount of effort and no more.  This will be pereived by her children as a diminishment of affection.  She is no longer giving them as much attention as she was when she was operating under the ‘delusion’ that her efforts would yield more and as yet uncapped results.  Her children’s edification, in this scenario, will not suffer, she will keep putting in just enough to max that out; only their feelings will be hurt.  Lets say her feelings would not be hurt by their feelings being hurt; does that make her cold hearted?  Is she a bad person?  Well, no, if we judge her by the standard we judge kilns and kiln operators by. 

Lets say she is a muadlin sentimentalist.  She just can’t bring herself to stop giving her children the maximum amount of attention she is capable of giving them despite the fact that it is ‘wasted’.  Is that good?  Should she, through ‘will to power’, master herself and spend her energies elsewhere more productively?  Well, yes, if we judge her in the way we judge kilns and kiln operators.

What is the proper moral/emotional orientation of a human beings ‘soul’?  What is the proper moral/emotional orientation of a mother’s ‘soul’?  I think Christianity provides a standard.  Maybe not a standard that you like or agree with but a standard none the less.  It is one of compassion and self-sacrificing love even unto death. 

I once saw a debate on C-SPAN between Hitchens and D’Souza.  D’Souza defended Christianity (for his own selfish reasons I’m sure, but I think the analysis was sound) because he thought that it brought a universal standard of compassion into the world; for all those who would accept it.  He said that the Greeks (pagans) ultimately scorned pity.  They may have had noblesse oblige but not quite the same.  They did that because thats just the kind of guys they were.  Not because its something one should strive to do regardless of the personal costs to one’s self.

I think it’s clear that men like Norman Lowell, William Pierce, and Adolf Hitler also, ultimately, scorned (do scorn in Lowell’s case) Christian pity and compassion.  No?

Based upon what we know about racial differences, I think that only Europeans are capable of living in a truly Christian fashion.  Our nature is capable of assimilating and living up to Christian standards.  It is said that what is ‘Christian’ about our behavior is simply also part of our nature.  Well, obviously potentially, but not necessarily, in my opinion.  Were our pagan, tribal ancestors known for mercy to their enemies?

I think that if we dispense with ‘Christian mercy’ we may well more efficiently ensure our genetic continuity and defeat our enemies with utter ruthlessness (yeah, I guess that would mean exterminating them, like in the “Turner Diaries") but we will have lost one of the better parts of ourselves that makes life so much more agreeable whence living amongst ourselves.  That is why philosophy, religion, and belief systems matter in my opinion: it determines the way in which we will conduct our struggle, or even, perhaps, whether we conduct it in earnest at all.  Will it be with Christian honor or pagan barbarism?  I think that’s important stuff and not just ‘easy online wankerialism’.

But how to rein in the suicidally universalist thrust of contemporary Christianity without dispensing with it outright?  Well, if we are the only people genetically capable of living in a truly Christian fashion and we go extinct then that pretty effectively kills Christianity too, right?  So, White Christians must be made aware of this.  I know, saying it is easier than doing it, yet I think it is worth the effort.

Also, its alot easier, on a personal level, for a White person, to live in a Christian fashion (thereby pursueing their own salvation) when surrounded by people congenial to it: that means fellow White people.  Less degenacy, less temptation, less cause to want to take revenge and all that.

Re: My swipe at ‘Straussians’.

That was not directed at you, GT.  That was directed at the scumbag Jews who try to dress up their naked ethnic aggression in all the finely taylored garments of the Western traditon.  They don’t have much Christian honor.