The old lion can still roar
Jean-Marie Le Pen, Front National member of the European Parliament, given just 4 minutes to explain the world to Monsieur Bruni, le président de la page trois.
He did alright.
From the BNP website, and originally from fdesouche.com
Comments (16) | Tell-a-Friend
The trackback URL for this entry is: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry
Trackbacks:
Comments:
Page 1 of 1 pages
Do the radical egalitarian miscreants that oppose and mock Le Pen have any inkling that their policies, which are driven by the ‘ethic of self sacrifice’ in its most extreme form, are resulting in ethno-suicide/genocide?
Of course they do, that’s what makes modern-liberalism so evil!
Did you see how some of those moral midgets were snickering at him, giggling, making fun of him, who were not worthy to lick his boots? Chief among those who dared behave in that manner was Danny Cohn-Bendit, “Danny-the-Red” of “Mai, 68” fame in his student days, sworn mortal enemy of all that decent people everywhere love and hold dear. That was the ilk, that was the level, of what dared to snicker at the history-making words coming from Le Pen’s lips, the level that hadn’t the values, civility, or respect of a kindergarten child, that could not grasp it was witness then and there to the best, noblest speech ever heard in those halls, halls fast becoming a lair of degenerates. Parliament? Parliament of whores, yes.
Posted by Fred Scrooby on Friday, August 1, 2008 at 11:54 PM | #
“Of course they do, that’s what makes modern-liberalism so evil!”
Correction, meant to say:
Of course they do, that’s what makes the practitioners of modern-liberalism so evil!
Posted by Dave Johns on Saturday, August 2, 2008 at 12:13 AM | #
This is a good but hastily delivered speech. Too bad Le Pen has one foot in the grave.
Do you think he will be charged with incitement of racial hatred for this episode? If there were a Congressman here in the States who spoke like this, can you imagine the outpouring of support he would receive from the white majority? People would deny supporting such a hypothetical candidate (as they likely do in France), but they (being mostly rural, Southern, midWestern, and Western folk) would vote for him in droves (especially in juxtaposition with the politicians currently in vogue). Too bad about those Diebold machines, really, and the lack of politicians boasting the home run combo of brains and testicular fortitude.
Posted by cladrastis on Saturday, August 2, 2008 at 02:01 AM | #
In the Middle Eastern country where I live, Steve Sailer, Gates of Vienna, and Brussel’s Journal cannot be accessed this morning. Vdare and American Renaissance along with David Irving are permanently bloacked. The internet censorship software for this country is composed in the USA.
Posted by Robert Reis on Saturday, August 2, 2008 at 06:13 AM | #
That was a good speech but, sadly, it’s not the sort of thing that, for reasons still murky, can move an euroliberal.
<object width="425" height="344"></param></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmQ2Mt2s9YI&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
But why does Le Pen feel the need to do this?
My French is very poor, but I’m sure he said he’s that black child’s godfather and that Dieudonné (I think he was referring to) was a Breton just like Le Pen himself.
Scrooby will tell you there’s not the slightest contradiction, none at all, between establishing such ties with a non-European and wishing to preserve your European nation, but there is, there is: what if every European established such ties?
Posted by silver on Saturday, August 2, 2008 at 08:51 AM | #
Ack, I screwed up the imbed. The youtube addresss is there, just copy and paste it.
Posted by silver on Saturday, August 2, 2008 at 08:52 AM | #
“In any event I remain: a wanderer through the worlds, cultures, languages, occupations, generations, and classes, and last but not least: still an active soccer-nut, as player and fan.” ("Undermining western cultures and peoples to the best of my ability...")
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3404701441.html
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Tuesday, August 5, 2008 at 08:41 PM | #
My mention of Dany Cohn-Bendit’s alleged pedophilia has been deleted. Why? It’s an established fact and he faced such accusations during his political campaigns. What are you afraid of, GW?
While Fischer was more concerned with demonstrations, Cohn-Bendit worked in the Karl-Marx-Buchhandlung bookshop and ran a kindergarten, with the stated ambition of radically transforming German mentalities. Later in 2001, he was accused of pedophilia in the context of a political campaign against Joschka Fischer as German minister of foreign affairs, and in the wider context of conservative movements seeking to undermine the cultural legacy of May 1968. The ground of the accusation was the following quote from his book ‘’Le grand bazar’’, published in 1976: “It happened to me several times that certain kids opened my fly and began to tickle me. I reacted differently according to circumstances, but their desire posed a problem for me. I asked them: ‘Why don’t you play together? Why have you chosen me, and not the other kids?’ But if they insisted, I caressed them even so.” Cohn-Bendit acknowledged that the passage had been carelessly written and recognized it as inappropriate. He asked for the text to be understood in the context of the sexual revolution of the 1970s and the provocations of the time.
http://www.answers.com/topic/daniel-cohn-bendit
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 01:27 PM | #
Friedrich,
You and I do not yet live in a system where a man is presumed guilty until proven innocent. Perhaps you would prefer it otherwise, I don’t know. But I stick by the presumption of innocence and avoid statements like, “Daniel Cohn-Bendit is a pedophile.”
Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 02:03 PM | #
“You and I do not yet live in a system where a man is presumed guilty until proven innocent.”
What are you talking about? He admitted the “inappropriate” nature of his actions. What else do you want before calling him a pedophile? Your “presumption of innocence” is quite expansive.
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 03:07 PM | #
Cohn-Bendit is a filthy scumbag, and you can quote me.
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 03:09 PM | #
Was Cohn-Bendit tried before a jury, found guilty and sentenced according to the nature and gravity of his crime? Does he have a criminal record to that effect?
If so, then you are within your rights to label him a pedophile. If not - even if he only managed to escape the verdict because his favourite uncle was the judge - you ain’t. That’s how it works, like it or not.
Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 04:03 PM | #
Your legalistic defence of Cohn-Bendit is touching, particularly considering that he has himself written about his “inappropriate” sexual contacts with prepubescent girls. I don’t need a “verdict” to call him a pedophile, his admission suffices.
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 05:11 PM | #
I am not defending Cohn-Bendit. I am defending you. From yourself.
Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 09:58 PM | #
You have a magnanimous disposition, GW.
Posted by Friedrich Braun on Wednesday, August 6, 2008 at 11:39 PM | #
Page 1 of 1 pages
Next entry: Saturday Riddle Classic
Previous entry: Time travel and a pol in the MultiCult
Posted by Dave Johns on Friday, August 1, 2008 at 11:30 PM | #