The Prison Cells that Await Us

Posted by Jean West on September 04, 2007, 12:11 PM | #

If the Jewish global anti-semitism legislation doesn’t get you, then Jewish hate-crime legislation, written by the ADL, will.  The latest victims are Shaun Walker (NA) et al.  Walker received a federal prison sentence of 87 months.
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/348307/two_men_convicted_in_federal_court.html

Should non-Jews be getting worried?

JW

Posted by Fr. John on September 04, 2007, 01:21 PM | #

Until and unless the SPLC, and the ACLU recognize that White males are Numerically the smallest on the planet, and therefore a LEGITIMATE MINORITY, all of this evil is merely heinous legislation and should be abolished, at every and all levels, as tools of Zionazi dominion. This is a religious war, and the Deicides are the only guilty ones, as they have been for TWENTY CENTURIES.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 04, 2007, 01:43 PM | #

It’s a tribal war.  It’s not a war of left against right.  The leftist thing is only used to recruit clueless “leftist” allies.  It’s a war of one tribe against others on a tribal basis.  In that 1984 Yuri Bezmenov interview we learned what happens to the “leftists” after the take-over.  They ... well, let’s just call it ... “disappear” and leave it at that, shall we?  They ... disappear ...

The reality is tribes, not leftism or rightism.

Posted by Steve Edwards on September 04, 2007, 02:39 PM | #

I read that article. What the f*** is a “bias-motivated crime”? What is this Marxist bullsh*t? Why not just call it a “crime”? And while we’re on that page, can I ask when an “envy"-motivated crime might make it onto the federal statutes?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 04, 2007, 04:10 PM | #

It’s thought-control, Steve.  And our élites refuse to stop it.  Unfricking believable but true.

Posted by Proofreader on September 04, 2007, 06:20 PM | #

If it wasn´t so scary it would actually be very funny! Only Jews would have the chutzpah of forbidding any criticism of them, however benign. Next, they´ll also outlaw praise of the Jewish people, as “repressed anti-semitism”. Be very afraid, Mr. Derbyshire and Mr. Sailer!
Worship of all things Jewish is both mandatory and suspect.

Posted by Svigor on September 04, 2007, 09:17 PM | #

I don’t see it as frightening; quite the contrary, I see this as the behavior of an increasingly frightened, aged, and dissipated group.

If they can’t get the Internet corked, they’re going to need more than an office.  They’re going to need a whole new branch.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 05, 2007, 02:13 AM | #

“In that 1984 Yuri Bezmenov interview we learned what happens to the ‘leftists’ after the take-over.” (—my comment, above)

Here‘s the link to the Bezmenov interview.  If you have time, listen to the whole thing:  it’s good.  Sure, we all knew this stuff but it doesn’t hurt to be reminded of it now and again, just in case you ever in some of your weaker moments start to think there are actually such things as leftism in the real world of power (not the fantasy world of “leftist” university professors).  In the real world the left doesn’t exist.  When the take-over comes the leftist non-entities suddenly ... what’s the word I want? ... Wait ... it’ll come to me ... Oh right, they vanish, that’s the word ... yes, as in a puff of smoke ... never to be seen or heard from again, exactly as in the fairy tales we heard in childhood (never seen or heard from again this side of the Gulag barbed wire, that is ...) (or worse ... )

(anyone here need “worse” spelled out? ....).

What’s going on isn’t “leftism” but tribal wars.  The leftists are merely some of the implements made use of in this war.

Posted by Amalek on September 05, 2007, 02:17 AM | #

While America plans to police the planet for anti-semitism, its Jews try to stiffen gentile sinews for the next phase of the USA’s proxy campaign against Israel’s regional foes.

“Gregg Rickman was the head of the Republican Jewish Coalition”.

The RJC’s front organisation, Freedom’s Watch, is behind a $15m ad campaign designed to convince Americans to “stay the course” in Iraq:

Four of five members of the board of a campaign promoting President Bush’s policies in the Iraq war are Republican Jews.

The board of “Freedom’s Watch” includes Ari Fleischer, Bush’s former press secretary; Matt Brooks, the executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition; Bradley Blakeman, a senior White House staffer in Bush’s first term; and Mel Sembler, a longtime RJC leader and former ambassador to Rome.

Brooks told JTA that the fifth member, William Weidner, a casino operator in Las Vegas, is not Jewish. However, Weidner’s wife, Lynn, is Jewish and is active in that city’s federation. Blakeman is the group’s president.

Brooks said it would be a mistake to regard the group as having a Jewish direction.

“It’s a coincidence that several of the board members are Jewish,” he said, noting that half of the donors contributing to the group’s first $15 million ad campaign are not Jewish.

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/103795.html

Sure it’s a coincidence. After all, fully 2pc of America’s population is Jewish, and as many as 10pc of them vote Republican!

The ads feature Iraq War veterans. None are thought to be Jewish.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 05, 2007, 02:30 AM | #

“The ads feature Iraq War veterans. None are thought to be Jewish.” (—Amalek)

Yeah I bet those weren’t the blinded, maimed and crippled war veterans they showed or the ones with faces burned off so badly that toughened doctors have to steel themselves to look once the bandages are off.  Highschool age, early 20s, youngsters.  Didn’t want to go but got mobilized in the Guards.  Had to.  No choice.  Whole lives ahead of them and all that ... or used to be.  More like behind them now ...  I bet those weren’t the ones in the ads ... anybody think? ... I could be wrong ...

Posted by Guessedworker on September 05, 2007, 10:01 AM | #

Here’s Weidner doing his bit for diversity.

Posted by Al Ross on September 05, 2007, 10:28 AM | #

Of course, GW, the controlling shareholder and Chairman of the LV Sands Corp is a Jew, one Sheldon Adelson.

Posted by Guessedworker on September 05, 2007, 11:20 AM | #

But surely, Al, you are not saying that these people secretly regard the Good Deed in Iraq as some kind of war for Israel, or that Great America is in some way just a tool of Jewish New York?  Because if you were saying that ... if you were saying that Establishment Jews who support the Bushite Benefaction only want it to surge to its happy, happy conclusion because it’s Good For Israel (and Jews, of course) ... well, you would, by extension, be maligning that generous and noble people who have suffered more than any other in the whole history of everything - and always from the Original Sin of White Skin, too (that’s white as in European, in this case).  Here is a wonderful people whose sons and daughters labour night and day, and night again - and, oi, day again too - for the good of all ... ALL, I tell you.  You must believe it, or you are not a decent man, Al.  Indeed, you will be punished with 87 months of separation from your loved ones.  Such is the love of G-d’s bought Congress and the President.

Posted by Al Ross on September 05, 2007, 11:25 AM | #

I stand rebuked and contrite, GW.

Posted by VanSpeyk on September 05, 2007, 02:20 PM | #

Could Robert Reis please link us to the source of his list? Not that I don’t believe they’re capable of pulling a stunt like this, but it’s just that I couldn’t find it.

Posted by 2R on September 05, 2007, 03:37 PM | #

If you’re interested, NPR’s radio program “On Point” discussed Walt & Mearsheimer’s book “The Israel Looby” today.  Walt and Mearsheimer defended their thesis well, however, I feel the book doesn’t go far enough.  They played a statement from Dishonest “Abe” Foxman where he said something like “Hitler didn’t start off by talking about the Aryan race, he started out saying the Jews were working for their own interests and were traitors to Germany, this book is making the same argument.” It was strange because for the first time, I found myself agreeing with Abe Foxman?  Anyway, I highly recommend listening to the show.  I added the link below.

http://www.onpointradio.org/shows/2007/09/20070905_a_main.asp

Posted by Amalek on September 06, 2007, 03:52 PM | #

Al Ross: “Of course, GW, the controlling shareholder and Chairman of the LV Sands Corp is a Jew, one Sheldon Adelson. “

Weidner is on the Freedom’s Watch board as a proxy for Adelson, reputedly the world’s sixth richest man. FW is therefore in effect a 100pc Zionist front, agitating for the continuance of a war in which American Jews are rarely found in the front line.

Adelson is a leading light of Jewish Republicanism and has donated $50,000,000 to Taglit-birthright israel, which finances trips for young American Jews to the Zionist entity and encourages them to settle there (no doubt while retaining their US passports, just in case).

Dual loyalty? Whaddya mean, dual loyalty, you hateful anti-semite?

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 06, 2007, 11:14 PM | #

Jim Kalb pens a few words that touch on this D.C. phenomenon known as the global anti-Semitism surveillance project. 

All the sensible Jews take one look at this project and wish there were a hole they could crawl into and disappear, so embarrassed are they at what the kind of Jews who have no sense, no shame, and no regard for the reputation of the Jews as a whole are forever up to.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 06, 2007, 11:39 PM | #

While we’re on the subject:  Professor Paul Gottfried pens a few thoughts on Bull Foxman, who’s managed single-handedly to harm the reputation of Jews even more than Barry Manilow.

Posted by Steve Edwards on September 07, 2007, 05:18 AM | #

Lawrence Auster on the banned anti-Islamisation demonstration that was planned for 11 September.

“If the court backs up Thielemans, if this and other anti-Islam, anti-EU demonstrations continue to be prohibited, what recourse will be left to the people of Europe but the violent overthrow of their present governments?

Which also raises the question: if the Europeans rise up against the quasi-totalitarian super-state under which they live, whose side will the U.S. government be on? We have previously pointed out the disturbing possibility that the real function of the U.S. military presence in today’s Europe is to protect the dictatorial EU from the people it rules.”

The last sentence bears repeating, “...the real function of the U.S. military presence in today’s Europe is to protect the dictatorial EU from the people it rules”. The U.S. military is not occupying Europe to save it from the Russians. There is no “threat from the east”. The threat is actually from below, in the streets of Europe. And I am not talking about the minority-inhabited suburbs where all the crime and rioting takes place. These people are on the SIDE of the elites. They are the cannon fodder. No, I mean the actual Europeans themselves are the real threat, which is why the global elites want them out of the way. 

If this demonstration remains under ban, the remedy should be as follows. Every last European Union official, including their enablers among each national government, along with all media apologists for the EU in Europe, must be overthrown, have warrants for arrest issued on their names, rounded up one-by-one and exiled to Zimbabwe. All the “former” communists who infiltrated the EU after the Berlin Wall came down should, of course, be executed en masse without trial.

Posted by Scimitar on September 07, 2007, 06:26 AM | #

I wrote a post yesterday about this very subject on my blog. Unfortunately, I wasn’t satisfied with it and deleted it. I like to keep my professional and racial interests separate.

There is no “occupation” of Europe by the U.S. military. American troops are there because Europeans want them there. Generally speaking, they like to outsource military service to the Yankees who push their economic interests in the Third World while they get to sit back and play the role of moral critic and spend their money on popular domestic social services. Whenever Europeans have asked them to leave, as was the case in France and Greece, they were promptly withdrawn, or in Asia, the Phillippines. The U.S. military presence in Germany is way down from what it was in 1990. The U.S. has been closing its bases and withdrawing troops from Germany for years now - often in spite of German protests. There was a new round of base closings there recently.

Some of you might be wondering what is going to come after Iraq. It is only a matter of time before American forces are withdrawn from that country. This is a few months away, if not imminent. And what that happens, there is going to be a reckoning in this country like there was after Vietnam. The question that will be on the lips of everyone is who lost Iraq and the War on Terror.

I’m convinced that the NATO military alliance, and not only the Bush presidency, is going to be a casuality of this. “NATO” is now a pejorative four letter word in the American diplomatic community. There is a growing movement against Atlanticism, a recognition that American and European interests have diverged, and that Cold War institutions like NATO are obsolete and no longer serve American interests.

There are calls for the re-militarization of Japan and arming that country with nuclear weapons, a Pacific Alliance, and deepening America’s ties with East Asia.

Personally, I would love to see a retreat into “splendid isolation,” but that is not going to happen. The military-industrial complex has only lost a war. We are entering a transition period in which the U.S. will reassess the role it wants to play in the world.

This was already happening during the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is a broad shift of American military presence and interest away from Western Europe and towards the Middle East, East Asia, and Africa. That hasn’t worked out so well in Iraq. The logical place for “redeployment” is to the Islamic periphery and elsewhere in the Asian continent.

Posted by Robert Reis on September 07, 2007, 09:21 AM | #

http://www.culturewars.com/2006/Conversion.htm

State Department list link

Cheers,

RER

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 07, 2007, 11:36 AM | #

“There is no ‘occupation’ of Europe by the U.S. military. American troops are there because Europeans want them there.” (—Scimitar)

What did the Yanks do, during de-Nazification and after, to those who didn’t want them there?  Right, the Yankee occupier ruthlessly eliminated any possibility whatsoever of patriotic opponents of the Yankee occupation gaining political representation in their own country (while simultaneously brainwashing the occupied nation’s children so whole generations would grow up rejecting their own national interests and believing the ‘Kwans and their Negroes are their friends), then says “we’re there because they want us there.”

I was once banned from a site along with others arguing a certain point of view, and then, immediately after our banning, the guy who banned us posted a taunting, triumphal comment derisively asking why no one was coming forth to argue that point of view.  Maybe — just maybe — he had something to do with it? .... Hey I dunno, call it a hunch ....

Talk about tautologies ... When the ‘Kwa together with the Negroes it drags around in train wherever it goes ruthlessly creates an artificial situation wherein none of the locals oppose ‘Kwa occupation, and then looks around and says “None of the locals oppose our occupation,” that’s pretty much what the guy who banned us did.

The FR"G" entity is an Amerikwan puppet state under U.S. military occupation.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 07, 2007, 02:13 PM | #

“The U.S. military presence in Germany is way down from what it was in 1990. The U.S. has been closing its bases and withdrawing troops from Germany for years now - often in spite of German protests. There was a new round of base closings there recently.” (—Scimitar)

A year or so ago over at the Occidental Dissent Forum I also thought the U.S. was winding down its occupation of the FR"G" entity until Dr. Brandt corrected my naïveté.  I’ve come to see he was right:  what the U.S. is doing with base-closings in the Entity is streamlining, making is position there “leaner and meaner,” that’s all.  It is not weakening its position there.  The ‘Kwa has no intention ever of evacuating its army from the Entity.  Of course the more Negrified the ‘Kwa gets the less able it’ll be to impose itself on white people and ultimately, as it approaches final Brazilianization, it will indeed be kicked out and its boot heel taken off the German windpipe, and its withered unclean claw unclutched from around the German throat.  It wanted to genocide the Germans.  If the ungenocided German remnant still stubbornly, heroically resisting Yankee race-death manages to hold on until the ‘Kwa genocides itself they the Germans will have a second chance to live.

Posted by Scimitar on September 07, 2007, 03:12 PM | #

No, that’s a fantasy.

If Germans really wanted American troops withdrawn from Germany, all they would have to do is utter three words, “please withdraw them.” And they would leave. Why can’t the Germans do that? The French, Greeks, and Filipinos have done so. To my knowledge, and feel free to correct me if I am wrong here, but that has never been tried.

The truth is that the Germans themselves want the American troops there. That’s money that flows into the local economy. When the U.S. closes down a base and starts redeploying troops elsewhere, this is protested by Germans. In spite of that, more and more troops are pulled out almost every year, as the interests of the Pentagon are shifting to other regions.

Germany is a nation that has lost interest in defending itself. German politicians would much rather blow their budget on popular social services. They don’t have what it takes to be nasty, spend their money on building up a large military, and using that military to push their interests abroad.

It is easier for them to let the Americans do it. That’s what we are: Europe’s mercenaries and security guards. That is what the so-called “leadership role” amounts to. Outsourcing their own dirty work is what allows them to put on the pretense of being some kind of “moral voice” or “conscience of the world.” They carry lemonade in Afghanistan while Brits, Americans, and Canadians get shot and blown up.

German Neo-Nazis would like to believe that WW2 is still going on, that the Third Reich still exists, that the German population, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, are really still National Socialists and are merely waiting for the signal to rise up against their “Western” occupiers. Of course none of it is true. It is merely typical German romanticism and wishful thinking.

You ask: what then did the U.S. do in Germany after WW2? It sacked and eliminated a hostile regime that declared war on the United States and attacked most of its neighbors. The same thing happened in Japan. The difference is that Japan isn’t a self-loathing, nihilistic nation because it is not in Europe. Sweden was never occupied by anyone, but it isn’t all that different from Germany.

We are constantly told that Europe has degenerated because of American influence. That doesn’t make any sense. Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, Taiwan, and Mexico have been more influenced by the United States than most European nations and they don’t have the same problems.

The degeneracy theory has been a common theme of anti-Americanism for over 200 years now. It has no basis in fact. Europe is far to the left of the United States on all sorts of issues. They are the trailblazers, but amazingly seem unable to see it.

Posted by _jimbo_ on September 08, 2007, 11:31 AM | #

‘Scimitar’ pontificates: You ask: what then did the US do in Germany after WW2? It sacked and eliminated a hostile regime that declared war on the United States and attacked most of its neighbors

hunh?

which history books have u been reading, champ?

the US had already declared war on Germany by its actions long before 1941!

the Reich ‘attacked’ its neighbours because they were going to attack it!

war was DECLARED on Germany by the AlLies not vice versa!

why?

because the jews had to stop Hitler @ all costs.....they declared war on National Socialism in 1933!

you’ve heard of ‘the Morgenthau Plan’ of course?.....read James Bacque if you want to know what it was REALLY like in post-War Germany; WWII/Europe was a race war by the jews & their minions against the White Race...no more nor less than that!.....the parlous state of the world to-day is because Hitler lost!

deal with it!

Posted by Scimitar on September 08, 2007, 12:57 PM | #

hunh? which history books have u been reading, champ?

Probably not the same ones you can find in your local public library or Barnes & Noble.

the US had already declared war on Germany by its actions long before 1941!

Yes, firing on hostile U-boats in the Western Hemisphere that were violating the Monroe Doctrine. What business does Germany have in the Western Atlantic?

the Reich ‘attacked’ its neighbours because they were going to attack it!

The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg was preparing to attack the Third Reich? Belgium?

war was DECLARED on Germany by the AlLies not vice versa! why?

The U.S. didn’t declare war on Germany. It was Germany, Japan, and Italy that declared war on the United States.

because the jews had to stop Hitler @ all costs.....they declared war on National Socialism in 1933!

The U.S. didn’t declare war on Germany in 1933.

you’ve heard of ‘the Morgenthau Plan’ of course?

Yes, I have. Obviously, the Morgenthau Plan was not implemented in postwar Germany. Germany was not de-industrialized into an agricultural state. On the contrary, it was re-militarized, showered with Marshall Plan aid, and integrated into the NATO military alliance. The U.S. opposed Oder-Neisse as the German border with Poland. That was Stalin’s doing who compensated the Poles for their loss of territory in the east at the expense of Germany.

.....read James Bacque if you want to know what it was REALLY like in post-War Germany

Why would I have to do that? My grandparents in Austria lived through that part of history. There reason there was so much malnutrition in Germany is because 1.) the U.S. was still at war with Japan and the military conflict in the Pacific took precedence, 2.) Germany’s agricultural lands in the east were occupied by the Red Army, and 3.) the devastation caused by the war, not in the least part which was caused by the retreating German army.

; WWII/Europe was a race war by the jews & their minions against the White Race...no more nor less than that!.....the parlous state of the world to-day is because Hitler lost!

No, I think you give the Jews too much credit. The Second World War was merely a replay of the First World War. The ultimate cause of both conflicts with petty nationalism. If it hadn’t been for petty nationalism, neither would have happened. Much of the world didn’t have this problem.

Posted by _jimbo_ on September 08, 2007, 03:57 PM | #

re: ‘Scimitar’....most of yr ‘assertions’ are wrong!

i/the US Navy was ordered to take ‘aggresive action’ against German naval vessels; whereas the Kriegsmarine was under strict orders not to offer any provocation whatsoever......AFAIK there are NO RELIABLE ACCOUNTS of instances where the Third Reich offered even the slightest provocation to US vessels;

ii/France & the UK had declared war on Germany; the RAF started bombing civilian targets in Germany shortly after the declaration of hostilities; France & the UK had a combined force exceeding that of the Reich; they had every intention of invading Germany; Belgium was an accomplice in this....prepared to give them ‘free passage’; also: UK & France had ALSO ‘violated Belgium`s neutrality’ & had military forces stationed there; as such, Hitler was perfectly entitled to invade Belgium...can’t comment on Luxembourg....i know little abt its WWII history;

iii/the US & Germany were already in a de facto state of war; Pearl Harbour was a 1940s-style 9/11 ‘set up’ to drag the US into war with Germany....who FDR viewed as the primary enemy....he was never overly ‘fussed’ with Japan(whose leaders & high-ranking military were treated with much more consideration & courtesy post-WWII than the Germans were....they were even permitted to retain their ‘Emperor worship!);

iv/the Morgenthau Plan had very high-level support; it was only a matter of dumb luck & a confluence of circumstances(most likely the Berlin Air-Lift crisis) that fore-stalled it; it was, in fact, well under way when that particular crisis intervened causing a re-alignment of the geo-political land-scape & prevented a genocide of Germans(or: a ‘final genocide’ to finish up what had already occurred!);

v/a reading of Bacque will detail the horrendous treatment inflicted on German POWs(in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention!) & civilians in the years immediately following 1945; there were also literal mountains of food-stuffs/rations available which could have been distributed to the starving Germans; how-ever, the crypto-kike Eisenhower was intent on ‘teaching the Germans a lesson they would never forget’ (which may well partially explain their current reluctance to be involved in any assertive militarism!);

vi/Japan had effectively been defeated by early 1945 & were making frantic peace over-tures; there was no reason what-so-ever that some largesse could have been shown the Germans; a reading of ZOG news-paper articles of the time, however, will quickly demonstrate the hatred & vituperation directed @ Germany & ‘the Nazis’; the brain-dead shepple of ‘the West’ had been ‘geed up’ to either ignore or condone gross mis-treatment handed out to their close racial kin;

vii/the jews were involved in all the higher levels of government & military (also: the media!) projects against Germany(as they are involved in most western nations to-day!)...they are culpable TEN TIMES OVER...the list of names is long.....Baruch, Frankenfurter, Morgenthau, Lindemann, Eisenhower &c &c....FDR may well have been a jew & Truman also(@ least: he was a chabbez-goi/high-level free-mason!).....it was jews & free-masons ALL THE WAY DOWN!......the Nuremberg prosecutor (Jackson) was also a 33° degree freeper!....most of the AlLied prosecution team were kikes too!

and so on and so forth......that’s my reading of the historical truth.....you can believe wtf you like.....AFAIMC......that’s the way it was......and it needs “ein Vereinbaren Rechnungsprüfungen” ASAP!

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 08, 2007, 04:08 PM | #

The Morgenthau Plan for Jewish revenge, dating from way before there was any question of mass killings of Jews, was executed to the tune of about fifty percent of the full plan.  The plan had too many opponents among shocked, dumbfounded Aryans in the D.C. government for the Jews to have free rein to implement it in its entirety.  Because the plan was hatched before there was any question of methodical killings of Jews, the Jewish desire for revenge was based on prior events, apparently the Nuremberg Laws (of which Israel today has its own Jewish version by the way).  The Jews wanted to get Germany back for the Nuremberg Laws, apparently.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 08, 2007, 04:38 PM | #

Race Replacement:  Don’t leave home without it.

(OK I won’t ... but without it why would I anyway?  I like my home!)
______

(Hat tip.)

Posted by Scimitar on September 08, 2007, 06:22 PM | #

i/the US Navy was ordered to take ‘aggresive action’ against German naval vessels; whereas the Kriegsmarine was under strict orders not to offer any provocation whatsoever......AFAIK there are NO RELIABLE ACCOUNTS of instances where the Third Reich offered even the slightest provocation to US vessels;

Where, pray tell, were these German U-boats, and what were they doing? Let me save you some trouble: they were within the Western hemisphere, violating the Monroe Doctrine, firing on commercial shipping off the east coast of North America. It doesn’t take a Jewish conspiracy to explain why that elicted American hostility. The Nazis knew full well what they were doing and how Washington would react to it.

ii/France & the UK had declared war on Germany; the RAF started bombing civilian targets in Germany shortly after the declaration of hostilities; France & the UK had a combined force exceeding that of the Reich; they had every intention of invading Germany;

None of this is of any interest to me. That wasn’t our problem.

Belgium was an accomplice in this....prepared to give them ‘free passage’; also: UK & France had ALSO ‘violated Belgium`s neutrality’ & had military forces stationed there; as such, Hitler was perfectly entitled to invade Belgium...can’t comment on Luxembourg....i know little abt its WWII history;

You said above that Germany’s neighbors were preparing to attack Germany. Where is your evidence that Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Yugoslavia, and Greece were going to attack? Again, I would like to see that invasion plan drawn up by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

iii/the US & Germany were already in a de facto state of war

No, the U.S. Navy had fired on a few U-boats in the Western Hemisphere. They had no business here in the first place. In that case, Hitler had literally crossed the line in the sand.

Pearl Harbour was a 1940s-style 9/11 ‘set up’ to drag the US into war with Germany....who FDR viewed as the primary enemy....

Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Under the terms of the Tripartite Pact, Germany was not required to go to war with the United States in such an event. Japan didn’t attack the USSR in Barbarossa.

he was never overly ‘fussed’ with Japan(whose leaders & high-ranking military were treated with much more consideration & courtesy post-WWII than the Germans were....they were even permitted to retain their ‘Emperor worship!);

Japan was allowed to run wild in China until it occupied French Indochina. After Japan did that, it became clear that the Japanese had ambitions in Southeast Asia.

iv/the Morgenthau Plan had very high-level support; it was only a matter of dumb luck & a confluence of circumstances(most likely the Berlin Air-Lift crisis) that fore-stalled it;

The Morgenthau Plan was discarded and Morgenthau himself was let go after Truman became president in 1945. Truman who took enormous pride in how he had gotten rid of “FDR’s Jewboys.”

it was, in fact, well under way when that particular crisis intervened causing a re-alignment of the geo-political land-scape & prevented a genocide of Germans(or: a ‘final genocide’ to finish up what had already occurred!);

No, Keegan’s Long Telegram, Churchill’s Iron Curtain speech, and the Truman Doctrine pre-date the Berlin Airlift.

v/a reading of Bacque will detail the horrendous treatment inflicted on German POWs(in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention!) & civilians in the years immediately following 1945;

That’s not what I have been told.

there were also literal mountains of food-stuffs/rations available which could have been distributed to the starving Germans; how-ever, the crypto-kike Eisenhower was intent on ‘teaching the Germans a lesson they would never forget’ (which may well partially explain their current reluctance to be involved in any assertive militarism!);

I addressed this above.

1.) The Soviets had occupied Germany’s agricultural lands in the east.
2.) The Pacific War was still going on; the U.S. had the logistical problem of transporting its European forces to the other side of the world.
3.) Germany was a mess from the war damage, from both the aerial bombardment and the havoc caused by the retreating German army.

vi/Japan had effectively been defeated by early 1945 & were making frantic peace over-tures; there was no reason what-so-ever that some largesse could have been shown the Germans;

But there was a good reason: there was another war going on.

a reading of ZOG news-paper articles of the time, however, will quickly demonstrate the hatred & vituperation directed @ Germany & ‘the Nazis’

And vice versa. What did Goebbels and his crowd have to say about the United States? They loved us?

the brain-dead shepple of ‘the West’ had been ‘geed up’ to either ignore or condone gross mis-treatment handed out to their close racial kin

Feel free to correct me, but didn’t the United States 1.) re-arm West Germany, 2.) shower it was Marshall Plan aid for it could rebuild its economy, 3.) support German re-unification, and 4.) oppose the Oder-Neisse eastern border with Poland?

vii/the jews were involved in all the higher levels of government & military (also: the media!) projects against Germany(as they are involved in most western nations to-day!)...they are culpable TEN TIMES OVER...the list of names is long.....

Wasn’t the U.S. war effort under the control of the anti-Semite Henry Stimson and U.S. Army Chief of Staff George Marshall who opposed the creation of Israel as Truman’s Secretary of State?

the list of names is long.....Baruch, Frankenfurter, Morgenthau, Lindemann, Eisenhower &c &c....

That’s really not a long list of names. It is telling that is the best you can do. Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury, not in a military role; Stimson, the anti-Semite, Secretary of War. Baruch - what official position did he have under FDR? Frankfurter, a SCOTUS justice. Lindemann - who is this?

....FDR may well have been a jew & Truman also(@ least: he was a chabbez-goi/high-level free-mason!)

No, FDR was an Episcopalian of Dutch and Huguenot ancestry. His mother was an anti-Semite. Truman was from Missouri. He wasn’t Jewish either. Truman’s wife wouldn’t let Jews into her parlor.

.....it was jews & free-masons ALL THE WAY DOWN!......the Nuremberg prosecutor (Jackson) was also a 33° degree freeper!....most of the AlLied prosecution team were kikes too!

!).....it was jews & free-masons ALL THE WAY DOWN!......the Nuremberg prosecutor (Jackson) was also a 33° degree freeper!....most of the AlLied prosecution team were kikes too!

What exactly does Freemasonry have to do with this? Wasn’t George Washington a Freemason?

and so on and so forth......that’s my reading of the historical truth.....you can believe wtf you like.....AFAIMC......that’s the way it was......and it needs “ein Vereinbaren Rechnungsprüfungen” ASAP!

No, you’re reciting Nazi propaganda. You don’t have a freshman level understanding of U.S. foreign relations.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 08, 2007, 06:51 PM | #

“violating the Monroe Doctrine,” (—Scimitar)

There was no more Monroe Doctrine once the ‘Kwans began sticking their nose in Europe, whether in WW I or from September 1939 to December ‘41.  The deal with the Monroe Doctrine was we’d stay strictly out of Europe’s affairs and we wanted them to stay strictly out of ours.  We’d abrogated that deal many times over by the time the Huns did anything to our coasts or shipping during the 1939-1941 run-up to Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration against us.  The Monroe Doctrine had long-since ceased to exist except in the fevered imaginations of certain ‘Kwans who wanted to have it both ways.

Posted by Lurker on September 08, 2007, 07:47 PM | #

To chime in with Scimitar. Britain had food rationing throughout WW2 and for years after 1945. Magically feeding other parts of Europe and Germany would not be easily achieved.

Posted by Scimitar on September 08, 2007, 08:13 PM | #

There was no more Monroe Doctrine once the ‘Kwans began sticking their nose in Europe, whether in WW I or from September 1939 to December ‘41.  The deal with the Monroe Doctrine was we’d stay strictly out of Europe’s affairs and we wanted them to stay strictly out of ours.

Why did the U.S. enter WW1? Because of Germany’s decision to 1.) wage unrestricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic and 2.) the Zimmerman telegram which proposed a military alliance with Mexico. Why did the U.S. enter WW2? Because Germany and Italy declared war on the U.S.

I know what you are going to say: well, America wasn’t really neutral because it was backing the Allied war effort with its material aid. The same was true of the USSR and Germany until Barbarossa, but the Neo-Nazis are strangely quiet about that. Apparently, Hitler’s alliance with Bolshevism from 1939 to 1941 was fine.

Mussolini was an idiot and Hitler paid dearly for being influenced by him.

We’d abrogated that deal many times over by the time the Huns did anything to our coasts or shipping during the 1939-1941 run-up to Pearl Harbor and Germany’s declaration against us.

What business do German U-Boats have in the Western Atlantic - waging war within the Western Hemisphere against a friendly power? That would have elicted the hostility of any American president whatsoever. Also, Canada was at war with Germany during this period.

The Monroe Doctrine had long-since ceased to exist except in the fevered imaginations of certain ‘Kwans who wanted to have it both ways.

The Monroe Doctrine still exists today. When the Soviets violated the Monroe Doctrine, the U.S. became an antagonist of them as well. This side of the planet belongs to us.

In the spirit of fairness, I am willing to let the Europeans, especially the British and Germans, have the other half of it. I have supported their partitioning of Africa. The U.S. has no business interferring in Europe’s affairs, whether it be in Europe proper or in their colonies.

I wish we could have avoided participation in the World Wars, but the stupidity of Germany’s leadership and the ambition of Wilson and FDR brought that about. Bismarck didn’t have this problem. He had good relations with the United States. The U.S. supported Prussia against France in the Franco-Prussian War.

Hitler would have had more success if he had taken his own advice. Instead, he was diverted from his own objectives one by one, mostly by his own opportunism.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on September 08, 2007, 08:30 PM | #

“The U.S. supported Prussia against France in the Franco-Prussian War.” (—Scim)

It did?  I did not know that.  It’s almost enough to make one proud to be a ‘Kwan ...

Posted by Rnl on September 08, 2007, 10:15 PM | #

you’re reciting Nazi propaganda.

I agree with Jimbo on at least one point. FDR wanted a war with Germany, and certainly wasn’t disappointed when it came, whereas Hitler did not want a war with the US, though he eventually declared war. There are articles on the IHR website that could be mentioned. But whether they would be convincing or not doesn’t really matter.

We live in the wake of the disaster of World War II. White nationalists should have no interest in polarizing interpretations that turn the Allies into monsters, just as we should have no interest in the opposite interpretation, which everyone hears almost daily. 

The average American did not want a war with Germany and the average German did not want a war with the United States. Both got an event they didn’t want. In itself that might be insignificant; people often get events they don’t want. But World War II was not only a terrible disaster when it occurred; it also had terrible political consequences in its aftermath that still affect us today, the most important being the ascendency of anti-racism, which has become the privileged ideology of our era. It may occasionally be interesting to speculate about which side was the most responsible for the disaster, but ultimately the issue should be trivial, like choosing sides in the Napoleonic wars. Both the winners and the losers of these European civil wars were people very much like ourselves.

NS-oriented racialists often respond to the constant demonization of Germany in the propasphere by reversing the process. I sympathize, but their own polarizing interpretation is just as simplifying and just as anti-Western. Some of them know that and promote anti-Allied demonology anyway. Others don’t. They are just responding to the success of anti-racism, which they rightly associate with NS Germany’s defeat.

Posted by _jimbo_ on September 09, 2007, 07:53 AM | #

scimitar: No, you’re reciting Nazi propaganda. You don’t have a freshman level understanding of US foreign relations

i get my ‘take’ on those days from the likes of Irving, Reed, Bacque, Veale, Joyce & Simpson.....ALL of whom i’v read....you can call that ‘fresh-man level’ if you like!

it seems to me that you’re jsut ‘reciting’ ZOG propaganda....wtf do u get YOUR HISTORY from?

the fckn ‘History Channel’?

BTW: i never said that ‘Belgium was preparing to attack Germany’; i said it was ‘an accomplice’.....Norway....the Brits were planning to invade there first....Hitler had to respond; Yugoslavia had to be invaded because of Mussolini’s fuck ups!.....AFA Denmark & Holland were concerned, the nazis were welcomed with open arms as ‘liberators’ from those jew-controlled ZOGs!
(BTW: i notice that you conveniently omitted the USSR as a vicitm of Nazi aggression!....or: is the evidence that Stalin was planning to over-whelm Western Europe too cogent for yr liking?)

AFA this ‘Monroe Doctrine’ bull-shite is concerned and Hitler ‘crossing the line in the sand’.....wtf right did FDR have to arbitrarily declare the Western Hemisphere ‘a zone of exclusion’ for Germany? who gave him that right and/or authority?......’the High Seas’ are NOT the property of any worthless ZOG!.....what a pity FDR didn’t declare ‘a zone of exclusion’ for kikez!.......

the list of jews i mentioned in FDR’s admin’ is only the ‘tip of the tip’ of the ice-berg....there were almost as many kikes under his aegis as there were under Clinton’s! (i stand by Elisabeth Dilling’s “Roosevelt’s Red Record” on that!)

but: as i said, feel free to believe wtf crap you like.....it bothers me not a whit....what does bother me, how-ever, is that a fckn crypto-kike like you might be involved in the white racialist movement!

Posted by _jimbo_ on September 09, 2007, 07:58 AM | #

(addendum to my abv post)..... the connection between kikez & free-masons is too well established and authenticated to bother repeating.....again: i stand on what i have read; in particular, “Secret Societies & Subversive Movements” by Nesta Webster ....which, i believe, was even given an impramatur of approval by war-criminal Winnie his-self!

Posted by Scimitar on September 09, 2007, 09:40 AM | #

it seems to me that you’re jsut ‘reciting’ ZOG propaganda....wtf do u get YOUR HISTORY from? the fckn ‘History Channel’?

I have a master’s degree in international relations from Duke University. I work professionally in the field of U.S. foreign relations . . . for ZOG, as you would call it. What about you?

i get my ‘take’ on those days from the likes of Irving, Reed, Bacque, Veale, Joyce & Simpson.....ALL of whom i’v read....you can call that ‘fresh-man level’ if you like!

Have you read anything by anyone who is actually in a position to know something about the matter?

BTW: i never said that ‘Belgium was preparing to attack Germany’; i said it was ‘an accomplice’.....Norway....the Brits were planning to invade there first....Hitler had to respond; Yugoslavia had to be invaded because of Mussolini’s fuck ups!.....AFA Denmark & Holland were concerned, the nazis were welcomed with open arms as ‘liberators’ from those jew-controlled ZOGs!

No, you said above that Germany attacked nations which were preparing to attack Germany. The Dutch and Danes did not welcome the Germans as liberators. Their efforts to export NSism there was an utter failure. Yugoslavia and Greece did nothing to warrant a German attack on those countries.

(BTW: i notice that you conveniently omitted the USSR as a vicitm of Nazi aggression!....or: is the evidence that Stalin was planning to over-whelm Western Europe too cogent for yr liking?)

The USSR was another jackal like Nazi Germany. It was really on the same level. For years, the USSR propped up the German war effort.

AFA this ‘Monroe Doctrine’ bull-shite is concerned and Hitler ‘crossing the line in the sand’.....

There is a geopolitical line in the sand. It stretches down the center of the Atlantic Ocean. Any hostile European power which crosses that line, which sticks their noses into our side of the planet, is classified as our enemy.

sand’.....wtf right did FDR have to arbitrarily declare the Western Hemisphere ‘a zone of exclusion’ for Germany? who gave him that right and/or authority?......’the High Seas’ are NOT the property of any worthless ZOG!.....what a pity FDR didn’t declare ‘a zone of exclusion’ for kikez!.......

That’s wasn’t FDR’s policy. It was set by his predecessors and remains in effect down to the present day. The Western hemisphere belongs to us. Your answer: by fiat. Of course the Nazis, Soviets, Holy Alliance, and the like are welcome to try, but there is no more surefire way to make an enemy out of the U.S. than to cross that line.

the list of jews i mentioned in FDR’s admin’ is only the ‘tip of the tip’ of the ice-berg....there were almost as many kikes under his aegis as there were under Clinton’s! (i stand by Elisabeth Dilling’s “Roosevelt’s Red Record” on that!)

The low level bureaucrats who worked for the New Deal? Most of whom were gone by WW2?

but: as i said, feel free to believe wtf crap you like.....it bothers me not a whit....what does bother me, how-ever, is that a fckn crypto-kike like you might be involved in the white racialist movement!

How am I a crypto-kike? I favor the expulsion of Jews from North America.

Posted by _jimbo_ on September 09, 2007, 11:33 AM | #

‘scimitar’: I have a master’s degree in international relations from Duke University. I work professionally in the field of U.S. foreign relations . . . for ZOG, as you would call it. What about you?

every-thing you need to know abt me is on my ‘blog!