The world is only White

by The Narrator

The ongoing debate/discussion about the pertinent steps to be taken to secure the sanctity and survival of the White race in America into the future continues its (seemingly) irrelevant pace.

Do we work within the system or try to reform it to our side?

Honestly, I’d say the answer is neither.

For one thing, the writing is on the proverbial wall, as this NYT article illustrates.  There is a clickable map at that site showing the percentage of minority students by state.

For another thing, it is entirely possible that, for a percentage of our ideological adversaries, the establishment of an official White Community (complete with social, economic and political advocacy) would be seen as the final victory over Western Civilization and Western Man.

After all, the pursuit of a “party” at this point is the pursuit of a chair at the table of what was once our own house. It is to psychologically and philosophically acquiesce ownership of our own civilization.

In that, I sincerely doubt the Left fears to see the rise of White Nationalism as a political option for White Americans who are, circa 2010, probably around 53% of the population of America. Once we become a White American Party we have accepted the terms and conditions of our enemies. We are, then, mere players in the new Gnostic world order of global community.

Put another way, when we accept the role as being yet another ethnic/cultural group WITHIN OUR OWN CIVILIZATION we have acknowledged defeat.

What then is our course of action?

For us Americans, it is not ‘Triumph of the Will’ that should inspire us, but ‘Zulu’. For that is closer to our current predicament. Whether we like it or not our immediate first step is to act and function in much the same way as Colonialists and Settlers in the 18th and 19th century did. We must accept that, for all intents and purposes, we are in the wilderness of the New World (or Darkest Africa), surrounded by violent savages incapable of being civilized, yet we are damned determined to create a functioning society for our people there. In this perspective, our historical culture is our homeland, our civilization from which we colonists have come. There, we are an everlasting majority.

Even if a functioning political party could be put together it would be ten years before it could ascend to relevant heights. By then we would have no majority with which to work our will within the system.

So we must look across the spectrum of space and time and see White people and only White people. We must set ourselves apart and beyond non-Whites. We must indoctrinate one another into the worldview that sees them as obstacles or objects impeding (or irrelevant to) our progress. We must view them much the same way we view mountains in the way of our railroads or wolves preying upon our flocks. What we must not do is seek a place at out own tables with the wolves or expect to converse cordially and reciprocally with the mountains.

We are one kind. They are another.

In that, I mean that we must view Whites as our kind and equals and non-Whites as not, because unless and until we are prepared to think and function in such a way, all attempts to stave off our demise will fail as the scenario (as it is) will inevitably be that of ‘two wolves and a lamb voting on what’s for dinner.’

Our political, philosophical and social adversaries are not blacks, Hispanics, Jews, Asians etc. Our adversaries (or allies) are always and only Whites.  A White man can be an enemy, but a non-White is merely an obstacle.

What I am most specifically speaking of is relegating those not of us to the extreme periphery of our experience and existence. And to those who would take moral umbrage to such a notion I would point out that we already do it in a variety of ways.

For example, how many people do we pass on the street, or in offices, or clubs, or parks etc. whom we compartmentalize as being outside of our social circle and thus outside of our concern or general acknowledgment? How many nightly news stories of human tragedy do we consider with any real depth?

So you see, we already have lines drawn.

Naturally, though, those lines form circles that emanate outwardly placing some closer than others. What we must do is fix the form and function of those lines to place Whites solely within and non-White completely without.  To do otherwise is to continue to ‘spin our wheels’ in the same muck that has stagnated us socially and culturally for decades.

Attempting to speak of our interests, politically or socially, within the polyglot system simply works to wall us in rather them wall them out.

What then should be the rallying call for our people in America?

Simple.

‘Abandon Ship!’

Looking at demographic projections it is a foregone conclusion that the United States of America is not a “shinning city upon a hill” but rather, the Titanic. The nation is sinking and nothing is going to change that. At this point the idea of vying to be a member of the crew when the bow is already underwater is insane.

What is needed is a Lifeboat Movement.

We need leaders to begin constructing the political, cultural, economic and social lifeboats with which our people can escape to safety.

There is already such a sentiment among an increasing percentage of us. Already Whites are distancing themselves from the ship of state. Not physically (in most cases) but philosophically and ideologically. White Americans are backing away from the mutated Marxist-Ghetto, Neo-Babylonian, third world -Ship of State- America.  There is no real struggle to regain the controls by the rapidly decreasing majority because, at this point, only the dimmest of bulbs aren’t noticing the increasingly vertical tilt that the RMS AMERICA is taking.

There is a strong sense of inevitable doom in the air. Our people are looking for a way out, not a way back in.

Our people are looking for the lifeboats.

Addendum:

To further illustrate the rapidly crumbling status of Whites within the United States, below is an update to an article I posted here last April called Painting a Picture in which I posted Census information on current estimates of numbers of Whites by states within regions. Below I have placed the updated estimates beside the originals.

Keep in mind that, though the percentage drops may look small, the two estimates are only nine months apart.  Also, the percentages are for ‘non-Hispanic whites’, which includes people from the Middle East and North Africa.

White demographic estimates - April 2009 January 2010

THE NORTH EAST
Maine: 95.5% 95.3% -.2%
New Hampshire: 93.4% 93.1% -.3%
Vermont: 95.3% 95.2% -.1%
Massachusetts: 79.7% 79.2% -.5%
Rhode Island: 79.3% 78.8% -.5%
Connecticut: 74.4% 73.8% -.6%
New York: 60.3% 60.0% -.3%

Original total was 82.5% White. New total is 82.2%

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
District of Columbia: 32.5% 33.1% +.6%

THE CENTRAL EAST
Pennsylvania: 81.8% 81.4% -.4%
New Jersey: 62.2% 61.7% -.5%
Delaware: 68.7% 68.3% -.4%
Maryland: 58.1% 57.7% -.4%
West Virginia: 93.6% 93.5% -.1%
Virginia: 67.3% 67.0% -.3%

Original total was 71.9% White. New total is 71.6%

THE SOUTH EAST
North Carolina: 67.5% 67.2% -.3%
Tennessee: 77.2% 77.1% -.1%
South Carolina: 65.3% 65.2% -.1%
Georgia: 58.5% 58.1% -.4%
Florida: 60.8% 60.3% -.5%
Alabama: 68.6% 68.4% -.2%
Mississippi: 58.9% 58.7% -.2%

Original total was 65.2% White. New total is 65%

THE NORTH-EAST CENTRAL
Ohio: 82.7% 82.5% -.2%
Kentucky: 88.0% 87.8% -.2%
Indiana: 83.5% 83.2% -.3%
Illinois: 65.0% 64.7% -.3%
Michigan: 77.6% 77.5% -.1%
Wisconsin: 85.4% 85.1% -.3%

Original total was 80.3% White. New total is 80.1%

THE NORTH-WEST CENTRAL
North Dakota: 89.9% 89.6% -.3%
South Dakota: 86.4% 86.1% -.3%
Minnesota: 85.7% 85.4% -.3%
Nebraska: 84.5% 84.1% -.4%
Iowa: 90.6% 90.3% -.3%

Original total was 87.4% White. New total is 87.1%

THE CENTRAL SOUTH
Kansas: 80.7% 80.3% -.4%
Missouri: 82.3% 82.1% -.2%
Oklahoma: 71.8% 71.4% -.4%
Arkansas: 76.0% 75.6% -.4
Texas: 47.9% 47.4% -.5%
Louisiana: 62.3% 61.9% -.4%

Original total was 70.1% White. New total is 69.7%

THE NORTH WEST
Washington: 76.1% 75.5% -.6%
Idaho: 85.6% 85.1% -.5%
Montana: 88.2% 87.9% -.3%
Oregon: 80.5% 80.0% -.5%
Wyoming: 87.3% 86.8% -.5%

Original total was 83.5% White. New total is 83.0%

THE SOUTH WEST
Nevada: 58.0% 57.1% -.9%
Utah: 82.3% 81.7% -.6%
Colorado: 71.3% 71.0% -.3%
Arizona: 59.1% 58.4% -.7%
New Mexico: 42.3% 41.7% -.6%

Original total was 62.6% White. New total is 61.9%

CALIFORNIA
California: 42.7% 42.3% -.4%

ALASKA
Alaska: 66.1% 65.7% -.4%

HAWAII
Hawaii: 24.7% 24.9% +.2%

And as a fairly large percentage of Whites in America are elderly (and thus will not be replaced when gone) the percentage drop for Whites will accelerate over the next fifteen years.

Add to that, continued high rates of legal immigration from non-White countries, continued mass migration across the southern border, higher rates of miscegenation and increasing numbers of childless or one-child-only Whites and it should be evident to all that establishing a political party to pursue legislative seats in America is an exercise in frivolity.

The ship is going down and nothing is going to change that. We must abandon ship. We need lifeboats!

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM in
Comments (52) | Tell a friend

Comments:

Posted by NR on January 27, 2010, 03:26 PM | #

Lifeboats, that can carry European Americans to South America, Russia, and Eastern Europe.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on January 27, 2010, 03:45 PM | #

NR, I like the “Thank You for Not Mixing” sign at your blog:

thank+you.jpg

Posted by Gudmund on January 27, 2010, 04:48 PM | #

Yes, the American state makes it increasingly unpleasant for White men (our women have it considerably better).  Between the danger of non-White crime, the ridiculous expense and risk involved in starting a family, the lack of any employment security, etc it is very hard to rationalize staying here.  Honestly I’m considering leaving as a long term plan.  It just isn’t worth the hassle and stress, plus the idea of further enriching a regime that is diabolically evil disgusts me.

Posted by torgrim on January 27, 2010, 07:04 PM | #

“It just isn’t worth the stress and hassle, plus further enriching a regime that is diabolically evil disgusts me.” Gudmund

Diabolically evil....well said, target ON!

As an example, Bill Gates and Gary Hart are blaming the victim today, for America’s social and economic disaster...an apt example of the above quote, in my opinion.

The example in the above well written piece by Narrator, of the Titanic with the “bow down and going under”, is most appropriate, for the ship of state, however, in California, it is more like a roman slave galley with those pulling the oars, weak, thin, dehydraded and ill....a Ghost Ship.

Posted by Gudmund on January 27, 2010, 07:22 PM | #

As an example, Bill Gates and Gary Hart are blaming the victim today, for America’s social and economic disaster...an apt example of the above quote, in my opinion.

Exactly, the plutocrats can be blamed 99% for the creation of the disaster and they shift the blame onto us, their White subjects.  What absolute scum.

You know some people say that White America will not go out with a bang but given how incredibly obnoxious our ruling class and racially alien underclasses are becoming I don’t think revolutionary violence is an unrealistic scenario.

Posted by Captainchaos on January 27, 2010, 10:37 PM | #

What I believe will happen as a result of the demographic decline of White Americans is that they will be dragged through the stages of radicalization and racial awakening whether they like it or not.  The more salient non-Whites become, both in media discourse and where one lives, the more one will be forced to come to terms with the implications of it.  There does seem to be a quality of inevitability to it.  The question is can this inevitably growing discontent be managed by the governing class.  It doesn’t seem to me that it can be managed forever.

Posted by Desmond Jones on January 27, 2010, 11:21 PM | #

What I believe will happen as a result of the demographic decline of White Americans is that they will be dragged through the stages of radicalization and racial awakening whether they like it or not.

Why now and not before? The WASPs were driven out by the Catholics and the Catholics driven out by the blacks. Now Mexicans are driving out the blacks. Why will the pattern change?

http://www.culturewars.com/Slaughter of Cities flyer.pdf

Posted by Desmond Jones on January 27, 2010, 11:23 PM | #

You said it before, and some are now just finding it out, “you can’t unring the bell”.

Posted by AD on January 28, 2010, 01:08 AM | #

You said it before, and some are now just finding it out, “you can’t unring the bell”.

But you might just be able to unbake the American cake.  It’s tricky stuff, and you won’t salvage all that went into it, and there will be some messy residue, but there’s reason to believe it could be done.

Posted by Captainchaos on January 28, 2010, 01:17 AM | #

Why now and not before?

But it did happen before.  I’m sure you recall the examples of the Klan’s opposition you have brought to our attention.

The WASPs were driven out by the Catholics and the Catholics driven out by the blacks. Now Mexicans are driving out the blacks. Why will the pattern change?

What happened before was that after having been displaced the initial populations found new territory in which they could resettle and find a condition of satisfactory stasis.  Of course the calibration of the system in terms of reward, punishment, status assignation, indoctrination all played a strong roll in disposing all concerned to tolerate a less than desirable situation.  But they did, and still do flee, none the less.  The pull towards genetically similar fellows cannot be expunged so easily.  In Western Europe there are actually (I feel like pinching myself every time I see an example of there success) nationalist parties that do something, as opposed to America where we see nothing.  Why?  The straightforward answer is population density.

You said it before, and some are now just finding it out, “you can’t unring the bell”.

Sure it can, but that depends upon how much power one is able to attain, and just how much leeway in disposing of that power one is willing to arrogate to oneself consistent with the ineluctable goal of undoing what has been done.  Not only Uncle Adolf, but his (we must not doubt!) moral superiors Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin knew it well.

Posted by Søren Renner on January 28, 2010, 03:21 AM | #

When the blackbird flew out of sight
It marked the edge
Of one of many circles

Posted by Matra on January 28, 2010, 03:30 AM | #

In Western Europe there are actually...nationalist parties that do something, as opposed to America where we see nothing.  Why?  The straightforward answer is population density.

That’s one answer, true enough. However, those Europeans have evolved as smaller nations or ethnic groups with unique cultures that make them naturally exclusionary.  The exclusion of out-groups reinforces shared characteristics within one’s own group and sharpens the distinction with the outsiders.  Increasingly, the entire English-speaking world, especially North America, is just a homogenised mass. White Americans (other than small ethnic and religious groups like Cajuns and Mormons) have no private cultural space.  Almost everything in their lives - schools, pop culture, sports, churches, community clubs, etc, - is shared with non-white people. If you’ve nothing of your own it’s difficult to know who is “us” and impossible to exclude others.  It happened to WASP America and is now happening to white America.

Posted by Captainchoas on January 28, 2010, 04:30 AM | #

If you’ve nothing of your own it’s difficult to know who is “us” and impossible to exclude others.

Here’s a paraphrase of a conversation I was privy to amongst young, working-class White men:

“I heard about this crackhead, welfare mother who abandoned her baby in a dumpster.”

“Was she a nigger?”

“Of course!”

And these are not racialists, and nary a prompt from me.  We know who we are.

Posted by danielj on January 28, 2010, 09:56 AM | #

But you might just be able to unbake the American cake.  It’s tricky stuff, and you won’t salvage all that went into it, and there will be some messy residue, but there’s reason to believe it could be done.

The problem with your theory is that basically everybody non-white is a type of CaptainChaos and you continue to labor under the delusion that they are you. The others have visions of conquest and domination and you have a vision of sharing and mutual respect. These are competing and opposed visions and I can only imagine that yours will come up short.

Demographics is destiny. This has been said since the time of Aristotle and you know it to be true but you get all ostrich about it whenever anybody tries to calmly bring it to your attention.

Posted by danielj on January 28, 2010, 10:08 AM | #

What I am most specifically speaking of is relegating those not of us to the extreme periphery of our experience and existence. And to those who would take moral umbrage to such a notion I would point out that we already do it in a variety of ways.

For example, how many people do we pass on the street, or in offices, or clubs, or parks etc. whom we compartmentalize as being outside of our social circle and thus outside of our concern or general acknowledgment? How many nightly news stories of human tragedy do we consider with any real depth?

Here is a Christian perspective. Perhaps we could fuse the ideas and come up with something Scriptural and beneficial for the race: Or a Michael Moore Lie Montage

Another similar point being raised about proximity and moral responsibility: On Their Way to My Pie

I suppose the idea is that even though we might “share” territory with certain people, they aren’t us and should therefore be considered to be well near the end of moral “food chain.”

Posted by the Narrator... on January 28, 2010, 12:32 PM | #

I think our most immediate step is to separate ourselves psychologically. ‘As a man thinks, so is he.’

It does us no short term or long term good to think of ourselves as part of the American social fray. We are White men who live in the White world.

I’m not thinking of “white flight”.
The most immediate example is the American Revolution in which the colonists separated themselves from the British Empire without physically moving. 
It was as much a psychological endeavor as a physical one. Only a third (or less) of the colonists supported the goals of their leaders at first.

Perception is about 90% of reality.

We don’t need to revolt or struggle with the American establishment (it’s doing a fine job of destroying itself) we just need to ignore it.
It’s power or sway over us (as a whole) is dependent upon our acknowledgment of it.

The United States itself didn’t come into being on paper or through voting or legislation or even international acknowledgment. It didn’t really exist until the population embraced the idea in their hearts and minds.
You can’t get a people (collectively) to fight for and support a country they don’t accept as existing.
The inverse is true.

We are leaving America without moving an inch, in other words.

We need leaders (such as MacDonald) to begin work on the lifeboats, rather than trying to re-arrange the deck chairs, because many are already looking for them and many still will come to look for them.
I think in all honestly the Haiti thing will be another nail in the coffin of “diversity”. America is in sh&@ty shape economically, socially, culturally and politically anyway.

And I believe Whites in America will react differently from Whites in South Africa when they realize the full measure of their disinheritance over the coming several years.

When South Africa began its fall there was still a predominant White world to appeal to. South African Whites were a mere enclave (perception wise).

But White Americans truly believe America to be the center of the universe. They believe America is civilization and all else is wilderness (be it Haiti or England or France or Bangladesh). So for them there is nothing higher to appeal to, nor is there another civilization to seek refuge in.

So when they realize the magnitude of their dispossession they will not try to run because they see no place to run towards. What they will most likely do is act and function independent of the old system. They’re not going to riot and loot and such. They are going to behave like White men in a wilderness attempting to build a functioning colonial settlement.

And that’s not being optimistic. It’s going to be a long messy process which will eventually lead to partition and then to… well, probably centuries of struggle for resources, military advantage and so on. Just like the rest of history.

But for the present, those of us already aware that we’ve hit the iceberg need to begin working on the lifeboats so that those who come to realize fully the situation in time to come can quickly and constructively pack their bags and make ready to leave.

We need to begin that psychological transition now to be as prepared for the physical one as possible.

...

Posted by Q on January 28, 2010, 01:17 PM | #

I think our most immediate step is to separate ourselves psychologically.

Agree!

First we need to teach our people to understand the concept of “white-guilt” and how it affects us. Then teach them from whom it comes from (cultural-Marxists [read: primarily Jews]) and how to thoroughly reject it. In short, we must reverse the brainwashing.

Professor MacDonald wrote an essay that relates to what I’m trying to articulate; he explains how the mind operates:

White Ethnocentrism: Can Americans Really Be Brainwashed?
By Kevin MacDonald

http://www.vdare.com/macdonald/081125_ethnocentrism.htm

Posted by Gudmund on January 28, 2010, 01:25 PM | #

We don’t need to revolt or struggle with the American establishment (it’s doing a fine job of destroying itself) we just need to ignore it.
It’s power or sway over us (as a whole) is dependent upon our acknowledgment of it.

I tried to explain that to the VNN’ers, it went over their heads.  They thought I was “advocating illegal acts.” For the record I did not say anything other than the land’s laws must at some point be ignored if we are truly to be revolutionaries.  What I saw at VNN is the conservative mentality, you know.  Simply by using the words “illegal acts” they concede that the government still has legitimacy in their eyes.

Posted by the Narrator... on January 28, 2010, 02:11 PM | #

For the record I did not say anything other than the land’s laws must at some point be ignored if we are truly to be revolutionaries.

Posted by Gudmund on January 28, 2010, 01:25 PM

It might be more accurate to say the opposite of that, in a way. After all there is a difference between the law of the land and the establishment.

If anything, we’re in a period of lawlessness now as the establishment tends to break down into anarchy when it comes to rule.

Law and order tend to be the endeavor of (almost exclusively) White people.

In fact you might say that is one of the names of the lifeboats we need to prepare, ‘Law and Order’.
As economic conditions worsen or stagnate, corruption increases, crime increases and chaos increases. Order and the rule of law bring safeguards against chaos and ruin.
And order and peace are things White people crave like no other people.

This is what I mean when I talk about us functioning as settlers in the Wilderness. The wilderness is violent and random. Its rules are based on instinct and selfish want. It lusts only to satiate its immediate needs. It gives heed to whatever pack is most vicious, vocal and numerous at any given moment.

In other words it is much like the multicultural establishment currently presiding over our society.
It is that system which we must ignore. We are men, not wolves or birds of prey.

What we seek is to re-establish law, not break it down.
.
.
.
.
Q,

I’ve always believed Prof. MacDonald would serve a greater purpose, not as a politician fighting in the fray, but as a professional sage giving further foundation upon which front-and-center leaders stand (such as the article you linked).

When a politician goes out to advocate his economic program he does so by appealing to the authority of an economist.
This is the role MacDonald was born to fill. When a pro-White leader goes out to articulate to Whites the need for consolidation he needs someone other to appeal to for confirmation of his position.

When MacDonald steps to the front himself as the leader of a party, he has immediately played that party’s entire hand.
.
.
.
.
Danielj,

Care to expand a little bit? I’m not sure what you’re getting at via the Wilson links..?..

...

Posted by Gudmund on January 28, 2010, 02:24 PM | #

What we seek is to re-establish law, not break it down.

I wasn’t promoting anarchy, as you say that’s what the government is in the midst of these days.  I don’t long for an ultimate breakdown of law and order but rather a reestablishment of durably ordered society.  That is not possible under the current regime.  The regime must be ignored and eventually it will govern nothing.

Posted by Dan Dare on January 28, 2010, 04:11 PM | #

Increasingly, the entire English-speaking world, especially North America, is just a homogenised mass. White Americans (other than small ethnic and religious groups like Cajuns and Mormons) have no private cultural space.  Almost everything in their lives - schools, pop culture, sports, churches, community clubs, etc, - is shared with non-white people. If you’ve nothing of your own it’s difficult to know who is “us” and impossible to exclude others.  It happened to WASP America and is now happening to white America.

Well said Matra. That is a crucial insight.

Gifting the Other with the English language has turned out to be a colossal blunder. I have often proposed, only slightly tongue in cheek, that one of the first acts of a patriotic government should be to declare Frisian, Dutch or Norse as official national languages and to phase out the use of English.

Posted by uh on January 28, 2010, 06:03 PM | #

Great, the most primitive, the goofiest, and the flattest of the Germanic languages. Why not make us do push-ups and chew pebbles while we recite the verbs?

Posted by Clark on January 28, 2010, 09:46 PM | #

“I have often proposed, only slightly tongue in cheek, that one of the first acts of a patriotic government should be to declare Frisian, Dutch or Norse as official national languages and to phase out the use of English.”

I say that one of the first acts of a patriotic government should be to make us all 10 feet tall and finally acknowledge the legitimacy of my perpetual motion machine.

Posted by Clark on January 28, 2010, 09:48 PM | #

I have just spoken to one of my young daughters. She has apparently set up a government of stuffed animals atop her bed, and they are issuing directives left and right.

Posted by WOOHOOH on January 28, 2010, 09:52 PM | #

“Diabolically evil....well said, target ON!”

ABSOLUTELY, MY MAN! We all know that lifeforms are either good, evil, or even sometimes DIABOLICALLY EVIL! The monkey is good, but the possum is evil! Etcetera…

Posted by danielj on January 28, 2010, 09:57 PM | #

Danielj,

Care to expand a little bit? I’m not sure what you’re getting at via the Wilson links..?..

Can’t yet. I’m gonna start addressing things at essay length. I promised GW. The first is going to be on health care though so I have to think about that primarily for the weekend.

Posted by Sweeping on January 28, 2010, 10:00 PM | #

“And order and peace are things White people crave like no other people.”

You said it, N. The disorderliness of Japan compared to the clockwork Slavic countries is legendary.

Posted by Gudmund on January 28, 2010, 11:44 PM | #

We all know that lifeforms are either good, evil, or even sometimes DIABOLICALLY EVIL!

An enemy regime bent on genocide then.  Is that more to your liking?  From my perspective they are evil.

Posted by Captainchaos on January 29, 2010, 03:09 AM | #

The problem with your theory is that basically everybody non-white is a type of CaptainChaos and you continue to labor under the delusion that they are you.

The ironic thing is that it is the centralization of the ongoings of society that has facilitated the bring of non-Whites into our presence, but, now that they are here by the tens of millions, a centralized authority would be the most effective and humane means of repatriating them.  Non-Whites would be (ideally) removed and provisioned for by professionals subject to strict guidelines as to how the process was to be carried out for which they could expect the termination of their employment and even imprisonment depending on to what degree they were to transgress against the legally binding guidelines laid down for them to follow.  Of course transparency would be key to enforcing the guidelines and preventing undue harm coming to non-Whites.  The decentralized approach with so many non-Whites already amongst us could well take on the aspects of a massive bloodletting pogrom.

Posted by Desmond Jones on January 29, 2010, 05:19 AM | #

Gifting the Other with the English language has turned out to be a colossal blunder.

One of Adolf’s 25 points.

(b) Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State. They must not be published in the German language.

Posted by the Narrator... on January 29, 2010, 07:00 AM | #

I wasn’t promoting anarchy,

Posted by Gudmund on January 28, 2010, 02:24 PM

I didn’t mean to imply you were.
.
.
.
.

You said it, N. The disorderliness of Japan compared to the clockwork Slavic countries is legendary.

Posted by Sweeping on January 28, 2010, 10:00 PM |

Okay, that’s funny.

But the orderliness of Japan today is a mix of Western imposition and the near robotic like nature of many Asians.

Passionless, ant-like-colony behavior is not exactly the same thing as a general zeal for peace and order (even if its never achieved).
.
.
.
.

Can’t yet. I’m gonna start addressing things at essay length. I promised GW. The first is going to be on health care though so I have to think about that primarily for the weekend.

Posted by danielj on January 28, 2010, 09:57 PM

Health care, shmealth care.....get on with the religious/social stuff.

Arguing about god(s) is something we can all agree on.

...

Posted by danielj on January 29, 2010, 09:29 AM | #

Non-Whites would be (ideally) removed and provisioned for by professionals subject to strict guidelines

We could call them the Schutzstaffel and they could also be security for the A3P smile

Posted by danielj on January 29, 2010, 09:30 AM | #

Arguing about god(s) is something we can all agree on.

I promise it will be woven into everything I write.

Posted by AD on January 29, 2010, 10:44 PM | #

The problem with your theory is that basically everybody non-white is a type of CaptainChaos and you continue to labor under the delusion that they are you. The others have visions of conquest and domination and you have a vision of sharing and mutual respect. These are competing and opposed visions and I can only imagine that yours will come up short.

I don’t know, Dan, is your half-Filipino daughter CaptainChaos?

Aside from the Aztlaners and some of the crazier muzzies I don’t think anyone’s really hell bent on “conquest and domination,” and if their leadership is, well, fuck them—People Power baby!

Demographics is destiny. This has been said since the time of Aristotle and you know it to be true but you get all ostrich about it whenever anybody tries to calmly bring it to your attention.

You must have been smoking some of those drugs you admit to enjoying so much when you composed that sentence.

Posted by danielj on January 30, 2010, 12:26 AM | #

I don’t know, Dan, is your half-Filipino daughter CaptainChaos?

Quarter. Son.

Aside from the Aztlaners

I’m in America. That is the principal threat.

You must have been smoking some of those drugs you admit to enjoying so much when you composed that sentence.

Nope. No drugs, no alcohol. You don’t know what an ostrich does?

Lastly, why are you sooooo angry?

Posted by Q on January 30, 2010, 04:06 AM | #

You said it, N. The disorderliness of Japan compared to the clockwork Slavic countries is legendary.

Posted by Sweeping on January 28, 2010, 10:00 PM |

Okay, that’s funny.

But the orderliness of Japan today is a mix of Western imposition and the near robotic like nature of many Asians.

Passionless, ant-like-colony behavior is not exactly the same thing as a general zeal for peace and order (even if its never achieved).

----

Not to mention the Orientals’ barbaric eating habits. Watch how they treat a fried fish that is still alive. They have a good time poking and laughing at it before they pick it apart and eat it with their chop sticks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivstO1Nv0rY

Posted by uh on January 30, 2010, 06:30 AM | #

Passionless, ant-like-colony behavior is not exactly the same thing as a general zeal for peace and order

Yea, the Japanese are really like ANTS. Come on bro. Is it really so inconceivable that the Japanese are inspired by the same compulsive need for peace and order as other advanced i.e. pale anal races.

Posted by the Narrator... on January 30, 2010, 07:35 AM | #

I promise it will be woven into everything I write.

Posted by danielj on January 30, 2010,

Health care?
Okay, abortion, stem cells and such.

Still,

29 If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away...... 30 And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away.
-Matthew 5

Plus you’d run into the problem that the healthiest nations on earth tend to be the most “godless”, no?

Same thing with states here. The more religious states tend to be more poverty stricken and crime riddled, thus on the low end of statistical health.
.
.
.
.

Is it really so inconceivable that the Japanese are inspired by the same compulsive need for peace and order as other advanced i.e. pale anal races.

Posted by uh on January 30, 2010, 06:30 AM

Who said it was inconceivable?

It’s simply unsubstantiated.

And I suppose Whites might appear anal to non-Whites. In much the same way the sun appears anal to the rocks.

...

Posted by Lurker on January 30, 2010, 07:54 AM | #

The Japanese dont seem to go in for the whole barbaric food routine, unlike the Chinese.

Posted by torgrim on January 30, 2010, 09:14 PM | #

“The Japanese don’t seem to go for the whole barbaric food routine, unlike the Chinese.” Lurker

From my experience, the Japanese look down on Chinese, “cuisine”.....it is a mistake to assume that the Chinese and Japanese share very much, culturally.

Posted by Lindsey Abelard on February 01, 2010, 11:33 PM | #

The NYT article shows the public school attendance for Oregon and Washington as 28% and 32% minority respectively. Most of these minorities are East Asian (Chinese and Korean) who share many of the cultural values as white Europeans: entrepreneurial work ethic, educational attainment, regard and mastery of technological achievement. Given that the Chinese themselves reflect these values and make up the rising 21st century superpower, does it not make sense to make a common alliance with the East Asian people?

I have spent most of my adult life either living in East Asian countries and/or in the company of East Asian people, both personal and professional. Their values are essentially identical to the protestant work ethic that built America. I feel as comfortable in the company of East Asians as I do with European whites. I think it foolish not to seek common cause with these people. I think the Caucasian and East Asian races together can build a technologically dynamic supercivilization that would span the Northern hemisphere.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 01, 2010, 11:54 PM | #

Lindsay it’s not about what you or I think of yellows, it’s about whites not getting race-replaced by yellows.  Capiche?

Posted by Yellow Menace on February 02, 2010, 04:59 AM | #

Lindsey Abelard - that type of thinking is what will eventually cause the entire West Coast of North America (from Southern Cali to British Columbia) to become a massive colony of East Asians in the Western hemisphere.

By 2075-2100 and beyond I imagine one+ billion East Asians having taken over the entire Western portion of North America (USA and Canada), pushing out most of the White people there in the process, and lording over a massive underclass of Hispanic serfs who they keep around for manual labor.  Also remember that many Hispanics are partially Asiatic, at least 40% and often much more - thus the Hispanic invasion of the USA is another wave of the Asiatic invasion.

Many cities on the West Coast of North America already have an Asiatic majority or near-majority—the process is already underway.  Vancouver, Seattle, San Fran, Los Angeles...they are already lost or near lost. 

Better resist while you still can White people or else you will lose half of the North American continent to Asiatics.

Posted by Al Ross on February 02, 2010, 09:33 AM | #

Lindsey, the East Asians are your friends as long as your culture can provide a template, both techno - wise and modernity - wise. Once Western culture has done, to the ultimate, what no sensible Eastern culture would do (i.e. invite racial aliens to attend their seats of learning in order for the whip -hand holders to donate, gratis, the cerebral fruits of their race) the prospect of East Asians constituting the majority may begin to pall. I would, therefore, invite you to re-consider your position.

Posted by Dan Dare on February 02, 2010, 06:59 PM | #

Required reading for anyone like Lindsey who still believes that the Chinese are our friends:

The Coming World War for Prosperity

It’s not as though we haven’t been amply warned.

”… And then, at the close of the last century the blind will-to-power began to make its decisive mistakes. Instead of keeping strictly to itself the technical knowledge that constituted their greatest asset, the “white” peoples complacently offered it to all the world, in every Hochschule, verbally and on paper, and the astonished homage of the Indians and Japanese delighted them. The famous “dissemination of industry” set in, motivated by the idea of getting bigger profits by bringing production into the market area. And so, in place of the export of finished products only, they began an export of secrets, processes, methods , engineers, and organizers.”

Oswald Spengler, Man and Technics, 1929

Posted by Q on February 02, 2010, 07:01 PM | #

Competitive altruists extraordinaries, Bill and Malinda Gates, are practicing the new and improved form of racism—racial discrimination directed at whites. It’s socially accepted to boot.

Note: This new fad of whites adopting niglets is reminiscent of when families, en masse, went out and bought dalmatian puppies after watching the movie ”100 Dalmatians.” As it turned out, the dalmatian breed do not have the best temperament when they become adult dogs. Hence, a rash of dalmatians being dropped off at animal shelters shortly thereafter.

Likewise, what will all these white adoptive parents do when reality sets in and they discover their cute little niglet has grown into Travis the Chimp? Will there be enough animal shelters available for them to drop their ‘mistakes’ off? But I digress…

http://angrywhitedude.com/?p=3519

Posted by Matra on February 02, 2010, 08:46 PM | #

Lindsey Abelard: I have spent most of my adult life either living in East Asian countries and/or in the company of East Asian people, both personal and professional. Their values are essentially identical to the protestant work ethic that built America. I feel as comfortable in the company of East Asians as I do with European whites. I think it foolish not to seek common cause with these people.

That some East Asian nationalities have fine qualities and lack the social pathologies of many other non-whites is only relevant if the quality of life when living amongst them is your main priority.  It is however irrelevant to those of us who wished to preserve the genetic distinctiveness of the West in general and our own ethnic groups and nations in particular.

Anyway, someone called Lindsey Abelard at In Mala Fide commented:

The finance guy married to the first lady should have married an East Asian (Japanese, Chinese, Korea) instead. East Asian women tend to be more respectful of men of accomplishment and less attracted to the “bad boys”. It is true that East Asian women can be as materialistic as any other women (if not more). However, they are usually more “rational” about it than the women of other races. Besides, East Asia is in its ascendancy, which is relevant to anyone working in technology or finance. No man of means should ever even consider marrying an non East Asian lady.

Bit of an agenda there Lindsey?

Posted by Dan Dare on February 02, 2010, 10:11 PM | #

Good find, Matra.

We shouldn’t still be surprised I suppose, but it is remarkable how frequently the most vocal advocates for miscegenation turn out to be, if not actually Jews, then common-or-garden axe grinders.

Posted by Fred Scrooby on February 02, 2010, 10:34 PM | #

Thanks for that bit of detective work there, Matra — puts this guy’s comment in some “perspective” shall we say?

He and his comment can now be totally disregarded.

Posted by torgrim on February 02, 2010, 11:03 PM | #

It’s one thing to see the similiarities in work ethic and other very positive behaviors, etc., and another issue completely, when it comes to crowding out the Founders posterity, in N. America.
What do we want to do to the N. American continent, sell it out for the dollar, have a billion teaming, swarming, masses of people here in a hundred years?

I was told by a friend of mine, a Japanese nobleman, 16 years ago, that it cost $300,000 to become a citizen of Canada back when the UK left Hong Kong to Red China. That is when Vancouver, BC became a foothold of China on the West Coast. In the US, it cost according to the same person, $1,000,000.

These are the same “leaders” that will pave over Calyfornia just to put up McMansions and the one- look- strip malls on prime ag land that can feed a good part of the world....madness.

Posted by Dan Dare on February 03, 2010, 12:06 AM | #

This piece from the NYT archives includes two of my favourite anecdotes about the late 90s infestation of Vancouver.

The first describes the ‘Astronauts’, the HK Chinese patriarchs who secured Canadian passports and right of abode for their extended families while remaining themselves in HK for business reasons.

Another concerns the the Vancouver ‘Tree-Nazis’, a group of concerned locals who forced the city council to pass a by-law forbidding the denuding of a lot of its trees when constructing a supersized lot-line McMansion, where a normal family house had stood before. Evidently one of the concerns that incoming Chinese had was that the large. old trees on suburban lots were havens for ‘demons’ and bad feng shui. The objecters were naturally tagged as ‘racists’.

Posted by Robert on February 22, 2010, 12:04 AM | #

This article sounds very defeatist and demoralizing.  Minorities are 40 percent of the population but White America is 74 percent the electorate.  It is still possible to reform the system through White Nationalist politics for at least the next 20 years.  The Census Bureau does not ask a person’s citizenship status when they count numbers and there are tens of millions of illegal aliens, refugees and foreign students being added to the tallies that reduce the White percentage of the population.  We are close to being 72 percent of the population when you exclude these groups and subtract jews and other Middle Easterners that are counted as White by the government.  The key to our survival is to prevent any amnesty, deport everyone of them back to their home countries and shut off all nonwhite legal immigration.  This is very doable if we can only muster the will.  Sadly, when I look at the state of many White people living in this nation, I wonder if it will ever happen.  If not, then I’m presently learning Spanish for a future move to Argentina.

Post a Comment:

Name: (required)

Email: (required but not displayed)

URL: (optional)

Smileys

You must prefix http://anonym.to/? to gnxp.com links...
e.g., http://anonym.to/?http://www.gnxp.com/...

Copy your comment to the clipboard or paste it somewhere before submitting
it just in case the software loses it because the session time has been exceeded.

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: (not needed for preview)

captcha shown here

Next entry: Beauty Alone Justifies Conservation

Previous entry: Borderless and red

image of the day

Existential Issues

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Englander commented in entry 'It’s Official – fake money is as good as the real thing (if not better)' on 03/15/10, 02:11 AM. (go) (view)

martin_uk commented in entry 'It’s Official – fake money is as good as the real thing (if not better)' on 03/15/10, 01:47 AM. (go) (view)

andrew muhling commented in entry 'The evolution of gang violence in Australia' on 03/15/10, 12:49 AM. (go) (view)

john rackell commented in entry 'It’s Official – fake money is as good as the real thing (if not better)' on 03/15/10, 12:38 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 10:58 PM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 10:38 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 10:06 PM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 09:09 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 08:55 PM. (go) (view)

Dan Dare commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 08:06 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 07:48 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 07:46 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 07:36 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 07:31 PM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 07:15 PM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 06:51 PM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/14/10, 06:33 PM. (go) (view)

Captainchaos commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 06:13 PM. (go) (view)

jamesUK commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/14/10, 05:38 PM. (go) (view)

Søren Renner commented in entry 'It’s Official – fake money is as good as the real thing (if not better)' on 03/14/10, 03:23 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/14/10, 01:23 PM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 11:30 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 11:11 AM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 11:05 AM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 10:49 AM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 10:43 AM. (go) (view)

Gorboduc commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 10:25 AM. (go) (view)

Borvo commented in entry ''Enlightened' Child Abuse' on 03/14/10, 08:54 AM. (go) (view)

Dan Dare commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/14/10, 06:31 AM. (go) (view)

jamesUK commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/14/10, 05:03 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/13/10, 09:27 AM. (go) (view)

John commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/13/10, 07:40 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'Wadham and the EHRC win. The existential will go ballistic.' on 03/13/10, 06:09 AM. (go) (view)

Wandrin commented in entry 'Europe's Future: Is this what "they" want?' on 03/13/10, 05:02 AM. (go) (view)

Grimoire commented in entry 'DDR or Third Reich, which would you choose?' on 03/13/10, 04:47 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.

Links

Endorsement not implied.

Crime

General

Immigration

Islam

Jews

Nationalist Political Parties

New Right

Science

Whites in Africa