When White Altruism Becomes “Controversial”

Andy Wooster wrote:

This is a very interesting explanation for leftist criticism of Israel, one that I admit I had neither considered nor heard put forth before now.

It’s ad hoc. Wintermute’s belief in overwhelming Jewish power faces some problems. Why does Israel sometimes get bad press in a media system controlled by Judah? Why are there academic boycotts of Israeli scholars in Europe? Why are so many left-wing anti-Israel writers and activists Jewish? The chain-yanking theory serves as an explanation for what should be regarded as contradictory evidence.

A sensible response would be that Jews have differing opinions about Israel. Finkelstein’s opinion of Israel is different from Podhoretz’ opinion of Israel. Another sensible response would be that not all opinions in the mainstream media are voiced by Jews or express Jewish interests. Jews dominate the mainstream American media; they don’t control every single opinion or piece of information that emanates from it. They certainly don’t control the media in Europe. Hence the markedly more critical view of Israel in the European press. In other words, the following is wrong: “at every point in the societal informational conveyer, there is a Jew, supressing, diverting, or damming up the free flow of information.” But anyone who accepts this simple view of Jewish media power will be forced to come up with ingenious explanations (like chain-yanking) for periodic anti-Israel commentary in the mainstream press. It must be interpreted as part of some larger strategy: “When Israel is causing too many gentiles to ‘wake up’, the chain is yanked.”

As a group Jews are hostile to us. Their interests are opposed to ours, and the political behavior of most Jews and all Jewish organizations reflects that fact. We don’t need to demonstrate (or in this case attempt to demonstrate) anything more.

I have no real objection to Wintermute’s exaggerated estimate of Jewish power, other than the fact that it is wrong.

“Do you mean the creation of life on Earth, Tommy, or human creativity?"--GW

GW, I mean human creativity.

GW, If you haven’t already read “The Hidden Face of God” I recommend you check it out. It’s a fascinating read.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0684870592/ref=sib_dp_pt/102-3802922-6184116#reader-link

Click on “excerpt” and you can read the first six pages. At the very least, I think you’ll find it food for thought.

Tommy G,

What I take from those pages is that the worship-gene carried by a proportion of us will express, and carry on expressing.  I look upon faith as a psychological vermiform appendage, of function to a pre-empirical world (which still obtains in most non-Western societies).  It will always be with us, always clinging to our guts.  It has no choice.

I didn’t think that G.L.Schroeder offered anything new or challenging.

Simply put, we now know not only that behind matter lies energy, but behind energy lies wisdom.

He then goes on to abstract from organisational complexity precisely the same case for the existence of God that was used by the Rev. William Paley, a 17th/18th century naturalist prelate who gazed in awe at dead flies down a microscope.

But insisting on the presence of God in a dead fly or in the human brain is simply wilfulness ... dogma drawn from the fundamental misapprehension that because Paley’s watch had a designer life must too.

In my humble and not very well informed way I just understand the brain as an evolved organ, and consciousness of self as a rather ancient selected enhancement to survival - both serving our not very cosmic purpose, and the purpose of all life around us, which is to transmit genetic information.

But because he possesses that damned gene Schroeder must have more ...

The wisdom contained therein is not at all evident in the physical building blocks from which life, even in its simplest forms, is composed.

Sorry, but that’s because organisational complexity does not prove wisdom.  Evolution is blind, not wise.  It is the instrument of life’s elemental pursuit of continuity.

Tommy,

I am not at all antipathetic to any of my own people on grounds of Christian belief.  I once read that one should never declare war upon faith in God since it is the final repository, should it be called upon, of conscience.

It is being called upon, of course, within Christianity, where moral feeling is expected to be progressive and universalist, and love of kind is, if kind means white, an unmitigated sin.

Do you read Jim Kalb’s Turnabout?  Jim is a devout Catholic and radical right intellectual.  He has a lawyer’s mind and a proper philosophical understanding of our present crisis, spiritual, political and demographic.

“As a group Jews are hostile to us. Their interests are opposed to ours, and the political behavior of most Jews and all Jewish organizations reflects that fact. We don’t need to demonstrate (or in this case attempt to demonstrate) anything more.

“I have no real objection to Wintermute’s exaggerated estimate of Jewish power, other than the fact that it is wrong.” (Rnl)

I quite agree. Moreover, it is a favourite straw man of race realism’s enemies to say that we believe all action to be “determined” by our genetic inheritance, rather than influenced by it. Whenever we speak of Jewry as a monolithic monster we make the same unscientific mistake-- tying ourselves in knots to prove that whatever any Jew says or does, no matter how seemingly antiethetical to their interests, is part of one ingenious master strategy. Wintermute falls into the fallacy of building a self-sealing argument. A thesis with no room for the unexpected, the contingent, the argument or action against interest, is not worth consideration.

I think the confusion and self-contradiction in the Hebrew camp is genuine, and to be expected. Emancipation is slowly but surely killing Jewish solidarity: the groupthink, groupspeak and group-act of the tribe.

It takes longer than for other ethnic minorities because Jews were more self-consciously separate to begin with, and in the early phases of assimilation (from c. 1789 to the present) they therefore fought harder agains the unfamiliar and upsetting process of losing their long-nurtured separate identity. Also, they have bred for verbal-ability intelligence, which makes it easier for them than for most cliques to cover their own panic and embarrassment by lying to others, but chiefly to themselves, about their motives and interests. However, Talmudic tricks of rhetoric and logic, the drizzle of chutzpah and reflexive doublespeak that Jewish spokesmen rely upon, are rumbled in the end. Such dishonesty reckons without the Caucasoid’s pragmatic talent for weighing words aganst deeds.

The slow waning of Jewish solidarity in the USA is beyond dispute. Not just the decline in religious faith, and its replacement by defective and increasingly unconvincing solidarity-enforcement devices, such as Holocaustianity. Not just out-marriage and the gradual desertion of customs such as kosher and circumcision. The truest marker of the fissiparosity of Jewry is the refusal of the majority to make aliyah.

Israel, their promised and predestined homeland, does not appeal to two-thirds of them. They don’t want to dwell alone among those weird settlers, militarists, sexually and financially corrupt politicians, primitive “Jewish Arab” sephardim, under a dodgy nuclear umbrella and surrounded by 20 countries which dislike them. They’d rather stay among the “antisemitic” whites. The answer to Herzl and his colonialist successors has consistently been thanks but no thanks. Jews have voted with their bottoms.

But their power over their American hosts-- financial, academic, media, political-- is also fading. Most no longer think it is necessary to demoralise and divide their potential persecutors by corrupting them or shaming them into silence. Those who still follow that line have overplayed their hand since 1945, flushed with the surrogate success of the USA in the war Zionism helped to provoke.

The creeping Likudnification of American politics since Reagan has been exposed not just by Mearsheimer and Walt but by an ex-president, no less.  The failure of the Iraq folie de grandeur has re-ignited the issue of the Lobby in a way not seen since the early 1980s. The difference between then and now is that memories of WW2 and politeness about not criticising Shoah survivors or their kin have been less inhibitory this time. Those reticences have been nullified by disgust at Israel’s actions and the censorial efforts of its cheerleaders in the States, who will do anything for the Zionist entity except move there.

(OTOH few American Jews dare speak out explicitly against the neocon agenda, even while voting 9:1 for Democrats who are mainly anti-war. That wouldn’t be “good for the Jews"-- old habits die hard. But sometimes apathy is enough.)

A cornered animal-- such as the Jewish neocon warmongering tendency now is, with criminal trials for espionage and treachery under way-- can be vicious. But my hunch is that its strength has already ebbed too much for it to do serious harm to the cause of American white self-preservation and the national interest. To alter the metaphor, “Jewish power” now resembles that of the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain and all you find behind the voice booming prohibitions and exhortations is a pathetic old man, going through motions that scare fewer citizens as each day passes.

Meanwhile thw Jewish kulturkampf is also losing momentum: the third or fourth generation of secularised movie producers or professors, reduced to nihilistic anti-everything postures, cannot be moral instructors of the goy majority. The backlash against the Jewish-led drive to remove symbols of Christianity from public places is a sign of more scales falling from white eyes.

Be of good cheer, friends. And don’t dismiss whole races as irredeemable, or credit them with too much cunning.

Amalek tells us, inter alia, that non-religious Jews ("decline in religious faith") are to be less feared than observant ones. I dont believe that opinion would have been shared by the victims of the Russian Revolution, the Jewish Bolshevik instigators of which were in the former category.

Also, Amalek informs us that Jewish power, (” financial, academic, media, political") is fading. As to Jewish financial power, the two most lucrative and fast-growing financial power-bases, hedge funds and private equity buy-out firms, are Jewish inventions and whilst the former are shadowy and often offshore-based, the latter group have become household names like KKR, Blackstone and Carlyle and are omniverously acquisitive, thus giving Jews increased ownership of US (and not only US) business.

If Jewish media power is fading, nobody informed the Jew, Jeffrey Zucker, who just replaced the Gentile, Bob Wright as head of NBC Universal.

With regard to Jewish political power, the recent Democratic Party gains in the US elections placed more Jews in elected posts than before and if the Chosen’s ruinous influence on academic power has lessened, I’d like to see some evidence of this unlikely development.

Bud,

What I do believe is that the US has been politically and culturally colonized by its racially-alien, Jewish enemies, who, if not exactly omnipotent, exert more power per capita than Whites could ever dream of.

“What I do believe is that the US has been politically and culturally colonized by its racially-alien, Jewish enemies, who, if not exactly omnipotent, exert more power per capita than Whites could ever dream of."--Al Ross

Al, you took the words right out of my mouth!