Category: Canadian Politics
This article is not by me. I hope it is of interest to all.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
March 4, 2008
By Brian Simpson (pseudonym)
I’ve been a supply teacher for 20 years in every subject area, K-12, in over 200 schools and in over 1000 classrooms in a large Canadian city. I can report that the education system has been taken over by feminists and lesbians who preach a daily diet of hate, violence and discrimination against males despite pretenses of “tolerance” “non violence” and “inclusiveness.”
It’s moderately common to find girls wearing anti-male, hate clothing. Slogans on T-Shirts include: “Stupid Factory: Where Boys are Made;” “BOYS ARE STUPID, THROW ROCKS AT THEM!” and (prefixed by the profile view of a handgun) “He had it comin’”
Others include “WHO NEEDS BOYS WHEN YOU HAVE CREDIT CARDS?” and “I LIKE BOYS WHO ARE SENSITIVE AND CRY, WHEN I HIT THEM;” and “MENtal Anxiety MENtal Breakdown MENstrual Cramps MENopause Did you ever notice how all our problems begin with MEN.”
Can you imagine if these comments were addressed at girls?
I would be interested to know what our Canadian regulars make of Connie Fogal’s civil libertarian, anti-globalist Canadian Action Party. I’ve just been perusing their website, which is very impressive ... not least for its journalism.
Here’s the front end of a two-part feature article titled: The Metamorphosis and Sabotage of Canada by Our Own Government. It is informed and detailed journalism of a calibre we do not see nearly often enough.
Of course, the Party is condemned to a narrow platform because it is operating within the existing liberal political milieu, so whether the radicalism can be summoned to really change things remains to be seen.Part One: The North American Union
The North American continent is being transformed from three sovereign nations Canada, USA, Mexico) into one regional corporate power base, the North American Union. Unlike the creation of the European Union, there is no public political/ academic discourse on the merits, or pros and cons of a North American Union building up to a vote within each nation as to the wish of the people to join such a union. Instead the union is being created by stealth, is already well on its way to fruition, and is being imposed on us by our own elected representatives and government with no opposition.
The driving force is corporate. The Chief Executive Officers of the most powerful corporations operating in the three countries want this union and have been working for some time devising their strategies and goals. Their facilitators are first, unelected officials and bureaucrats who move easily between corporations and government; second, former elected officials like John Manley , former Deputy Prime Minister of Canada; third, the heads of the three nations, Martin, Bush, and Fox; and finally, the governments and the rest of the elected members who apparently just rubber stamp what is put in front of them by the unelected officials- few questions, if any asked.
The ultimate enforcement mechanism for the North American Union is a police state.
The tools for the police state are “anti-terrorist” laws which, in themselves, are a ruse to strip the citizens of civil liberties in order to prevent dissent against the police state.
The Orwellian justification is “security”, “safety”.
Mexicans are now upset at Canada for its allegedly rough and racist treatment of Mexican arrivals.
But this cannot be right. According to Canadian conservatives (ie. USA fifth columnists), National Review, and Mark Steyn, Canuckistan is a wimpy, PC, Euro/UN- loving, liberal country unlike the patriotic, virile, and tough USA - “the West’s last hope”. I’m so confused!
The gloriously incorrect municipal stance of Herouxville in Quebec has been widely applauded on the radical right. We have paid it too little attention. Here, then, is a bulletin - admittedly over a week old - from immigrationwatchcanada.org which touches on all the key aspects of the case.
The tumultuous entry (now broadcast around the world) of Herouxville, Quebec into Canada’s immigration debate demonstrates the great divide that exists in Canada on the immigration issue.
On one side are the majority of Canadians who instictively feel something is wrong with Canada’s mass immigration policy (currently about 250,000 per year, the highest per capita in the world). On the other side are Canada’s mass immigration industry and its supporters (often described as a fifth column) who tell Canadians that mass immigration is wonderful.
The national and international uproar that Herouxville has caused is wildly out of proportion to its size. The town has a population of 1300 and is located in rural Quebec, about 150 km. northeast of Montreal. Most Canadian towns and cities of all sizes have passively accepted the historically high immigration levels that Canada’s federal government set for the country in 1990, but which it has never justified. In doing so, Herouxville is literally like David taking on Goliath.
In fact, the little town’s virtual “Declaration of the Rights of Canadians”, which bravely contradicts official multicultural policies, sounds almost like a call to revolution.
Discriminating on the basis of ethnicity is “UnCanadian”. At least that’s what we are told day in day out. Some Koreans don’t appear to agree with that as they are planning to have an Asian only shopping plaza in British Columbia. This article from Immigration Watch Canada probably exaggerates by referring to a “major public furor” as there are few newspaper articles about it. But it needs to be read by those who say hard working Asian immigrants with their low crime rates are desirable.
The only mainstream press story about this seems to be this from the Vancouver province. In it it is claimed that some Canadians are calling for boycotts of Asian stores - good luck finding a corner store not owned by Asians.
A week or so ago when John Ray was arguing that Jews vote against their EGI I made a few comments regarding Canadian Jews - starting here. Some prominent Canadian Jews - life-long Liberal Party supporters and fundraisers - have announced they’ll be switching to Stephen Harper’s Conservative Party due to the latter’s tough stand against Hamas and Hezbollah. Here are excerpts from a Toronto Star article with some comments.
Actually Harper is wishy-washy when it comes to defending traditional values against feminists, homosexuals, ethnic minorities, and violent criminals but I doubt life-long Liberals like Gelberman care much about such matters.
“Harper is not so scary” to Jews because he shows few signs of promoting the interests of traditional Anglo-Saxon Canadians.
Still no sign of Jews caring about their EGI.
The Toronto Star is reporting that Canada’s Immigration Minister Monte Solberg will not follow the likely path of the US and issue an amnesty for the estimated 200,000 illegal aliens in the country:
In recent days many illegal aliens, mostly Portuguese, have been deported causing concern, and a few demonstrations, in some ethnic communities.
Canada is, of course, renowned for its political correctness - the Conservative minority government is planning to speed up the immigration application processs and to cut the landing fee. But the rejection of an amnesty, the on-going deportations, not to mention the basic respect shown for the law are more than the supposedly hard line right wing US Republicans are likely to manage. Yet US conservatives never tire of making fun of multicultural “socialist” Canuckistan!
If the polls are right the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) leader, Stephen Harper, will be the next prime minister. As good as it would be to see the back of the corrupt Liberal Party Harper becoming PM is nothing to get excited about. Harper has jettisoned most of the conservative agenda of the old Reform Party, including it’s social conservatism and opposition to multiculturalism.
Last year I pointed out here that it was virtually impossible for the CPC to get elected in areas with a sizeable ethnic minority vote as the Tories are seen as the party of white traditional Anglo Canada. Well, the party has certainly tried to change that! They’ve gone all out to court the minority vote with loads of ethnic candidates and lots of bragging about how it was the original Progressive Conservatives (an ancestor of the CPC) who made Canada officially multicultural in the 1980s.
The annual “Boxing Day Blowout” got a whole new meaning in Toronto on Monday when an innocent 15 year old girl was shot dead and six others wounded during a shootout between rival “youths”. With shooting homocides nearly doubling this year it’s not that unusual to be shot dead in Toronto, however, this happened outside the city’s top tourist destination, the Eaton Centre - Toronto’s “Times Square” - on one of the busiest shopping days of the year. Everyone is shocked, disturbed, and, apparently, baffled by the rise in gun violence in “Toronto the Good”.
Fortunately, there are politicians, social workers, columnists, and various other experts happy to pitch in with their suggestions explaining why Canada’s largest city is changing.
David Miller, the city’s touchy feely mayor, claims that in addition to gun shop robberies the Americans are to blame. Perish the obviously racist thought that he’s referring to the expansion of the Bloods and Crips into Canada.
Some conservatives say the Chinese are immigrants we can live with. They work hard, are relatively law abiding, and they seek to conform and avoid confrontation with their hosts, right? Well, not so fast.
A $500 head tax imposed by the Canadian government on Chinese immigrants between 1885 and 1923 has become a major issue to many Chinese during the on-going general election campaign. Given that the Chinese are the largest single “visible minority” group in Canada that means some politicians are ready to, uh, kowtow to them.
On Saturday it was revealed that the Deputy Minister for Public Works in Canada, David Marshall, had placed a temporary ban on the hiring of able-bodied, white men.
The reason Mr Marshall gave for the employment ban on white men was to make sure that the public service was “representative” and inclusive of “disadvantaged groups” such as women, visible minorities, aboriginals and the disabled.
But the fact is that the representation of women, aboriginal people and the disabled in government employment is already greater than in the Canadian workforce as a whole. Only visible minorities are less well respresented in the public service, and only by a small margin (7.8% compared to 10.4%).
Yesterday, MR reader Ed Derbyshire sent me a Toronto Star article about a truly surreal response from leading black activists in Toronto to the wave of gun crime in the city.
Wow, you’re thinking. They’ve understood. Finally. What a tragedy it’s taken so many lost and broken lives to drive the point home.
, stone me, they’re even talking about segregation!
But no. Not really. Reading on we discover that:-
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa