[Majorityrights Central] Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. [Majorityrights News] Moscow’s Bataclan Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. [Majorityrights News] Soren Renner Is Dead Posted by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. [Majorityrights News] Collett sets the record straight Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. [Majorityrights Central] Patriotic Alternative given the black spot Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. [Majorityrights Central] On Spengler and the inevitable Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. [Majorityrights News] Alex Navalny, born 4th June, 1976; died at Yamalo-Nenets penitentiary 16th February, 2024 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 16 February 2024 23:43. [Majorityrights News] A Polish analysis of Moscow’s real geopolitical interests and intent Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 06 February 2024 16:36. [Majorityrights Central] Things reactionaries get wrong about geopolitics and globalism Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 24 January 2024 10:49. [Majorityrights News] Savage Sage, a corrective to Moscow’s flood of lies Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 12 January 2024 14:44. [Majorityrights Central] Twilight for the gods of complacency? Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. [Majorityrights Central] Milleniyule 2023 Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 13:11. [Majorityrights Central] A Russian Passion Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 December 2023 01:11. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part four Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 02 December 2023 00:39. [Majorityrights News] The legacy of Richard Lynn Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 31 August 2023 22:18. [Majorityrights Central] Out of foundation and into the mind-body problem, part three Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 27 August 2023 00:25. [Majorityrights Central] A couple of exchanges on the nature and meaning of Christianity’s origin Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 22:19. [Majorityrights Central] The True Meaning of The Fourth of July Posted by James Bowery on Sunday, 02 July 2023 14:39. [Majorityrights News] Is the Ukrainian counter-offensive for Bakhmut the counter-offensive for Ukraine? Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, 18 May 2023 18:55. [Majorityrights News] Charles crowned king of anywhere Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 07 May 2023 00:05. [Majorityrights News] Lavrov: today the Kinburn Spit, tomorrow the (New) World (Order) Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 April 2023 11:04. [Majorityrights Central] On an image now lost: Part One Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 07 April 2023 00:33. [Majorityrights News] The Dutch voter giveth, the Dutch voter taketh away Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 18 March 2023 11:30. [Majorityrights Central] News of Daniel Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 03 March 2023 05:18. [Majorityrights Central] A year in the trenches Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:40. [Majorityrights Central] Talking to normies about fascism Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, 10 February 2023 06:33. [Majorityrights News] British Treasury and Bank of England manoeuvre towards CBDC Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 04 February 2023 22:44. [Majorityrights Central] What lies at the core Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 24 January 2023 00:01. [Majorityrights Central] Elite contests and contradictions: Part 2 Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 18 January 2023 00:30. [Majorityrights News] At Davos the Chinese change strategy Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 17 January 2023 23:20. [Majorityrights News] Mission creep takes a hit at the Fed Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 11 January 2023 00:39. [Majorityrights Central] Hat-tip to Woes Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, 01 January 2023 00:11. [Majorityrights Central] Scott Mannion and the being of the English Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 10 December 2022 01:12. [Majorityrights Central] Neil Oliver: The Re-Set has already happened Posted by Guessedworker on Saturday, 03 December 2022 22:42. Majorityrights Central > Category: European NationalismYesterday the UN General Council voted by the required two-thirds majority to exclude the Russian Federation from the UN Human Rights Council. This morning the Kremlin’s reply landed at a train station in the Donbas - not one missile but two, and not a single-warhead but cluster munitions. Initial reports say thirty people were killed on the spot, and a further hundred injured. It is totally apparent from the personal items and clothing strewn about the place that this was not a military target. The local mayor has stated that there were some 4,000 civilians at the station at the time. The strikes were a perfectly clear statement to the effect that the Kremlin doesn’t give a damn about the safety and human rights of the people of the Donbas, never gave a damn about the safety and human rights of the people of the Donbas, and will break any and every moral boundary it pleases. Even to make a bitchy political point. One awaits the first Western nationalist to explain that if only the UN General Council hadn’t been so aggressive in pushing Putin to the limits, those refugees might still be alive. Well, three days ago the Spectator carried a piece on the massacre in Bucha. It referred to a remarkable article which had appeared in the state-owned, Russian-language news service RIA Novosti. The Spectator article was written by one-time resident in Putin’s fiefdom Christopher Booth. It set out the future of endless de-Nazification for Ukrainians in the Donbas and the south who cannot free themselves from Russian occupation and control. Of the Novosti article it says:
So, a Russian propagandist writing in a state-owned Russian publication, giving advice that cannot be at odds with Kremlin thinking, is seeking a “de-Nazification” that is not at all restricted to the Azov Battalions but is code for a population-wide cleansing of “guilt”. This is precisely how the horrors of the Soviet Union proceeded. It explains what a survivor of Bucha told the Western media, namely, that the Russian soldiers were demanding where “the Nazis” were and, in some cases, stripping villagers in search of incriminating tattoos. Some of this behaviour has been ascribed to Chechens. But it is also ordinary Russian soldiers ordinarily brutalising and murdering people of their own accord, because such behaviour is, if not ordered, more or less given licence from above. Russian military operations have been that way in Chechnya and in Syria. So we come to the matter of support among Western nationalists for Putin and the Russian military. For years now I’ve been referring to the borderline personality types who populate our world. These are people who are unable to “fit in” with the general Mind. But they are perfectly able to withstand all the hatreds that are visited upon nationalism, rather like bacteria in hospitals that survive the action of chemical cleaners. Our politics, therefore, is a natural home for these people. On the Spectator thread there was an explanatory comment by someone named Venk (evidently not a nationalist himself) which I found relevant:
One would hope that the missile strikes on Kramatorsk train station might cause some of these folk to think again. But for many, I think, the itch to attack “the West” and “the Jews” will be just too powerful, and they will go on, like the Russian propagandist who apparently wants the gulags back for the next twenty-five years, giving voice to the same certainties in fulfilment of the same emotional needs.
This is an essay written for PA’s site. It is a first attempt to shift British nationalism towards a genuine nationalism of ethnicity ...
BASE ASSUMPTIONS 1. Our people are dying by the hand of our own political class and the corporate and banking interests which they serve. It is, then, not a natural death, or an inevitable outcome of jet travel and the will of poor peoples around the world to improve their lives. It is not a political mistake, or an act of stupendous negligence. It is not a “pay-back” from history. It is a political assassination, and the assassins know precisely what they are doing, and want to do it. It is their chosen course for us. It is a true genocide by Article 2 (c) of the 1948 Convention, for which they confidently expect not to have to answer. The two principal methods the assassins employ are: a) Endless, colonising and replacing migration of populations from elsewhere in the world. b) Psychological warfare, also known as culture war, on the natural role and character of Man and Woman, and on our ethnic person. But beneath these lies an array of deep-seated causalities acting upon us from the history of events and from the history of ideas, the sum of which presses us to the inevitable conclusion that “a serious assault on the citadel of Western elitism and political power” must mean a revolution on no mean scale. A simple change to national politics alone will, in the longer term, be constrained and, finally, erased by the continuing effect of these foundational forces. Many, and quite possibly all of them, have to be swept away, too. The following chart of these forces, including those striving for control of the future of all humanity, supplies a relational form to them, be they historical or historiographical, or even futuristic! I am still astonished, when I gaze at the totality of it, at just how much harm for our precious people there is in this world. Heaven knows, there is room for some good.
Any novel and genuine politics of change must possess a set of interlocking core principles derived from a theory of Man’s reduced condition and a countering and inspiring vision of what he properly is. That latter must be reflected in the ultimate value advanced by these politics, and the whole must be eminently communicable, indeed politically virulent; and for that people have to know that it is true. One shortfall in any of these respects and historical purchase will not be possible, even when the prevailing system is grown stale and unproductive, and the people yearn for a relevant and fresh, hopeful way forward. So poorly mapped out is ethnic nationalism, so poorly has it been served by thinking nationalists, and so unsympathetically, oftimes deceitfully, by liberal academics, that all three of these necessities - structure, ultimate value, and truth - are scarcely addressed at all in any formal sense. Properly resolved they would advance our nationalism considerably towards becoming the holistic and original philosophy we desire it to be. But they are not the only unresolved issues. The problem of becoming, or human purpose, and the problem of the individual and his freedom also cast a long shadow, as does the problem of the sheer scale of the revolutionary endeavour. With all that in mind, then, we will now try to make some progress, or at least some useful observations, commencing in this essay with the problems of structure and of becoming. Value, truth, and the individual must await a part four, and even five. The problem of structure As explained previously in this series, we routinely profess ourselves to be ethnic nationalists, espousers of a communicable philosophy. Really, though, the most that can be said of us is that we are nativists. Nativism at least has a structure to it. It is defensive and survivalist. It is the politics of the place of arising ... home, the source of the people, the parent of their distinctiveness. It is important. But it can never rise to the station of a positive, organising system for living ... never get beyond defence of the people’s life and land. Descriptively, a nationalism of ethnicity must be holistic, naturalistic, existential, authenticising, universal (in the sense of true of all peoples), defensive before it is expansive, and preserving before it is conserving. As the political expression of the native principle, it is the politics of ethnic genesis on the soil and so of the natural right ... the native right ... to defend kind and home. It is, then, the active politics of genetic interests, of the kin relation. As the politics of all settled peoples it is the politics of peace and the complete antidote to liberalism’s post-Christian and anti-European universalism. It is the politics of consciousness of being. It is the politics of the authentic in us individually and, therefore, collectively, because consciousness in a people, like natural wisdom in a crowd, is accreting. But what are the principles underpinning all this? How do they articulate socially? The following (tentatively proposed) structural scheme may take things forward: It exhibits a rather extensive collection of base principles and, in the upper range, a row of states leading to triads of active processes. All are arrayed across three distinct but interlocking dynamics, shown here as rising columns.
Yesterday, after trailing his skirts for several months, Eric Zemmour finally announced his candidature for next April’s French presidential election. He did so with a brilliantly crafted speech, which I reproduce below. Nationalists, meanwhile ... real ones ... have likely already discounted the possibility that a Jewish anti-Islamist and culturist would, if elected, deliver a nationalist outcome. Yes, he says “The Third Worldization of our country and our people impoverishes it as much as it disrupts it, ruins it as much as it torments it.” But he also says, “So that the French will feel at home again and so that the latest arrivals assimilate to their culture and appropriate their history.” Then there is much confusion caused by his adoption of Renaud Camus’s grand remplacement terminology (which Marine Le Pen has not taken up). Does that signify adoption of the theory as such? Is he at all hostile to non-Muslim foreignisation, if those foreigners integrate culturally? Yes, he says “we will not allow ourselves to be replaced”. Yes, he speaks of “the minorities who never stop tyrannizing the majority”, but is he speaking only of Muslims, Islam and jihad? The one certainty is that his language and his candidacy will push the future of the true French to the centre of the campaign, and force the traitor-parties to speak of the one thing of which they are most afraid. If, as seems possible, Zemmour beats Le Pen and the other challengers to proceed to the second round against Macron (presumeably), the Great Question of nationalism is very likely to become the great question of French politics, win or lose. That much this man can do for true nationalists. Here is his speech:
I would like to be able to say that, finally, one of us has been granted access to the golden temple of the respectable, and we’re going mainstream, baby. But not yet. Not quite. James Delingpole, “libertarian-conservative” and freedom junkie though he is, hasn’t been entirely respectable himself for a few years now. He is too much the enfant terrible of climate scepticism - a role he has honourably discharged for a dozen years - and, latterly as executive editor of Breitbart London, far too far right, doncha know. His discovery of Davos and The Great Re-Set has, of course, tipped him over into Tin-Foil World, from which there is no coming back. James is lost to liberal reason and the literati dinner party circuit forever. He is about 40% “there”, from a nationalist perspective. But one should say that none of us are sufficiently informed to be more than, say, 60% or 65% of the way, and actually none of us really knows what 100% would be, because the boundaries keep expanding. Who knew anything very much about the Re-Set even two years ago. Anyway, James gave a very kind and entertaining hearing to Morgoth, not diving too deep because that’s not the way these interviews work, but deep enough to satisfy. A lot of typically Morgothian bases were covered ... Tolkien, Spengler (he was good on Spengler), lots of cultural analysis and analysis of the “power” in power elitism, the left, the Re-Set, the football. Morgoth acquitted himself well and demonstrated that a Northumbrian bloke from a building site can parley with as much intellectual authority as anyone. As James said, he stood up his arguments. There was one slightly scary moment when Morgoth mentioned the tribe, and one could see James pondering his Breitbart earner. There was one other moment when James just possibly revealed a liberal paternalist’s abiding contempt for nationalism; but it passed quickly. But that aside, it was a convivial chat about hugely important matters, and I enjoyed it. I just wish that the doors to the wider world would start to open now; but I suspect that in the present febrile climate they are probably closing on James too. You can listen to the interview, all 1 hour and 2 mins of it, here:
Today the Telegraph reported on an academic paper commending a new lexicography of race and ethnicity in order to combat very, very naughty racist thoughts by white men:
Dr Birney is actually Prof Birney, and as well as holding other positions in the gene biz he is a co-director of the European Bioinfomatics Institute, the “home for big data in biology”. Oddly, this rather large and, no doubt, exceedingly well-funded organisation does know what race is when it needs to:
Along with himself, Prof Birney credits five colleagues with the writing of the paper, which is titled “The language of race, ethnicity, and ancestry in human genetic research”. They set out their case thus:
Prof Birney also has a blog, which he has not used much, it must be said. But his last but one post back in 2019 was titled “Race, genetics, and pseudo-science: an explainer”, and it explains that:
Denying race is a form of professional lying, which is invariably undertaken by otherwise educated people “because racism”. Prof Birney could as easily prove the taxonomic validity of race as disprove it - a fact my good friend John Standing thought he might demonstrate to the anti-racist Prof by way of some emailed questions, as follows:
The following short article marks the close of my efforts to bring PA to seriousness. I have said what I wanted to say. There is no point in going on saying it. Whether it will have any effect over the time remaining to PA itself, before it is proscribed, remains to be seen. Where responsible and intelligent political advocacy for our people will come from, heaven knows.
Of course, the road to electoral relevance is never the same in any two European homelands, and nowhere is it bound to produce unending success. Political fortunes wax and wane. In Denmark, for instance, the experiment with nationalism in government has lasted only one parliament so far, between 2015 and 2019. But if the Danish People’s Party can maintain its electoral relevance it may return; and that is as much as can be asked at this very dark moment. The ideological keys to electoral relevance are pragmatism and moderation. By their nature, democracies tend, over time, to encourage all serious political parties to moderate to the prevailing political consensus just to become and remain relevant. In our time in our benighted country the weight of national security laws and the manner in which they are worked by the security apparatus of the state also place an absolute obligation on politically ambitious nationalists to follow the same path. It’s not as if there is a real choice. So the question, really, is how, not if; and for starters the how is to switch out of the negativity and reaction which has characterised the nationalist past ... the racism, the anti-Islamism, the WW2 guff, the anti-Semitism, the white nationalism and alt-rightism, and all the rest. Yes, our people have the right in Nature to struggle to exist in this world, and we can advocate for it. We can advocate for respect from government. We can advocate for fairness and freedom. We can prosecute our right under constitutional law and human rights law to come together and choose our destiny, if we so wish. None of that changes, and in Sweden that coming together is a key ... perhaps the key ... nationalist appeal. The front page of the party’s website reads “Välkommen till folkrörelsen”. It means: welcome to the popular movement. The party’s wiki page opens with the following:
That, or something very like that, is how the Tyndall-esque movement we, in many respects, still are can develop into a real and responsible servant of our people’s life-cause. It’s no great mystery. Yes, we have to change mightily to do it. But it’s not as if we have a choice. It’s not as if those who would argue otherwise have any positive and hopeful, patriotic alternative.
Page 2 of 33 | Previous Page | [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] [ 4 ] | Next Page | Last Page |
|
Existential IssuesDNA NationsCategoriesContributorsEach author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer. LinksEndorsement not implied. Immigration
Islamist Threat
Anti-white Media Networks Audio/Video
Crime
Economics
Education General
Historical Re-Evaluation Controlled Opposition
Nationalist Political Parties
Science Europeans in Africa
Of Note MR Central & News— CENTRAL— Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan … defend or desert by Guessedworker on Sunday, 14 April 2024 10:34. (View) Patriotic Alternative given the black spot by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:14. (View) On Spengler and the inevitable by Guessedworker on Wednesday, 21 February 2024 17:33. (View) Twilight for the gods of complacency? by Guessedworker on Tuesday, 02 January 2024 10:22. (View) — NEWS — Moscow’s Bataclan by Guessedworker on Friday, 22 March 2024 22:22. (View) Soren Renner Is Dead by James Bowery on Thursday, 21 March 2024 13:50. (View) Collett sets the record straight by Guessedworker on Thursday, 14 March 2024 17:41. (View) CommentsThorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:01. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:52. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:23. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 20:07. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:39. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 17:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:20. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:01. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:31. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:52. (View) James Marr commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 09:21. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sun, 21 Apr 2024 05:25. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:49. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:37. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:24. (View) Anon commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:38. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:16. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:19. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:43. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:16. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:33. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:42. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:38. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'On Spengler and the inevitable' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 06:23. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:55. (View) Al Ross commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:26. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:58. (View) Thorn commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 20:49. (View) Guessedworker commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:00. (View) James Bowery commented in entry 'Soren Renner Is Dead' on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 16:22. (View) |