Category: Islam & Islamification
Paul Weston’s blog: http://paulweston101.blogspot.co.uk/
Liberty GB: http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/
Hat-tip to Morgoth
The British media were doing so well to avoid covering the riots in Stockholm. No bad news could be tolerated, you see. Nothing to be allowed to penetrate the carapace of blissful multcultic ignorance. Not while this UKIP surge was on everyone’s mind. Then, right out of the blue, a completely savage and random attack by two black Moslems on a serving soldier. In broad daylight in London. A virtual beheading. Rivers of blood. A sole middle-aged white woman standing up for right. The Metropolitan Police Service checking Health and Safety regs for twenty minutes before finally showing their faces and shooting the bastards. The Muslim Council of Great Britain gets in early with a bit of damage limitation.
Cue the media. Cue their control instincts. “Comments are closed”. “Comment removed”. “Edited by a moderator”. Meanwhile, nothing will shake our determination to have business as usual blah, blah. Meanwhile, with lightning speed the EDL Twittered and Facebooked it’s way to Woolwich. Meanwhile, the media pile in with an anti-white, anti-EDL message. A handy bit of misdirection.
And so it goes. Just one DT article carried comments for a very few hours. You can read them here.
Today Sean Thomas, the Daily Telegraph blogger, journalist and, under a pseudonym, author, posted a piece about the latest case of Moslem Grooming, this time in Oxford. It was titled “Oxford gang rape: did people ignore this sort of scandal because racist Nick Griffin was the first to mention them?”
The article skips through a little of the history of the offence before arriving, in the last two paragraphs, at the efforts made by Nick Griffin to raise consciousness of it and shame the police into action:
Comments on the article were disabled. But appalled commenters raised the concerns on an unrelated thread, myself among them. Thomas let it be known via a tweet that his original article had been doctored by a DT editor but it had since been amended. It was still bloody awful, obviously. So I emailed him to tell him so:
Another atrocity that didn’t take place in Syria, but in Burma, being passed off as the work of the Assad regime. The page, featured at an Egyptian website, had a million likes. You know who’s behind this.
Much more on the warmongers and their lies:
Muad’Dib has released an updated version of his movie 7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT, to commemorate the 7th anniversary of the July 7, 2005, London bus and tube bombings. The first version of 7/7 Ripple Effect made a clear case for people with inside access perpetrating 7/7, not Muslims. Muad’Dib sent copies of this video to the courthouse trying to prosecute innocent Muslims over the 7/7 bombings. The police arrested him for “perverting the course of justice.” Muad’Dib sought refuge in Ireland and spent over a year and a half fighting extradition to England.
Some of this ended up in the news. They exposed his identity as John Hill, and tried to trash him because of his unusual religious beliefs, never addressing any of the arguments in his video.
Muad’Dib lost his legal battles in Ireland and was taken to England, in shackles, by anti-terrorist police. No record was made that he was imprisoned, and only clamor by his supporters got him registered as an inmate, but only briefly, and he was granted bail after 4 months in jail, after the prison service kept making “mistakes” or “forgetting” to bring Muad’Dib to his own court hearings. Muad’Dib learned that many people had mailed his video to the courthouse, to prevent innocent Muslims from being scapegoated, but none of these were arrested because they were just mailers; Muad’Dib was the one who produced the video.
Muad’Dib attempted to challenge the court’s/British legal system’s lack of jurisdiction, but this was brushed aside. Muad’Dib’s trial has to be one of the most absurd instances of prosecutorial misconduct. Even the Judge summarized the case against Muad’Dib with gross distortions, redefining words, disallowing evidence by the defense and assigning statements to Muad’Dib that he never made. But the case was such a farce that the jury returned a not guilty verdict. See summary of Muad’Dib’s ordeal.
Muad’Dib was using the domain jforjustice.co.uk, but this domain is apparently in the process of being seized.
Now who were these people with inside access to perpetrate the 7/7 bombings? 7/7 wasn’t masterminded by those racially English. People don’t do something like 7/7 to their own, and England had nothing to gain from 7/7, only things to lose: deaths, injuries, fear, hatred, emotional trauma, legislation to further undermine civil liberties, deeper involvement in foreign wars, debt. The only people who stood to gain from it were the ones who benefited from having English soldiers go around the world fighting and killing Muslims. Only one racial group had the means, the motivation, the solid credentials to pull off false flag operations, and the need for 7/7.
To download the DVD of the movie (follow the first link above to watch online):
Posted by R-news on Saturday, July 7, 2012 at 12:32 AM in Awakenings, Islam & Islamification, Jewish Diaspora, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, War on Terror, World Affairs
Much has been written on the deterioration of public school education and television programming over the last few decades. These amount to an attempt to dumb down the population.
The MSM would have the public believe that a Head of State was using an ordinary email service provider, based in the U.S. [New York], to discuss personal matters and matters associated with the State. The MSM would also have the public believe that this Head of State used this email service even though he knew that the U.S. administration is hostile to Syria and there’s a nuclear-armed hostile neighbor, Israel, that would love to get its hands on the President’s emails, which the Mossad surprisingly didn’t hack much earlier. The MSM would also like the public to believe that this Head of State, fluent in three languages, highly educated and a promoter of internet services in Syria, did all this in spite of having “a degree of awareness of web security”:
Deleting emails as soon as they arrive shows a degree of awareness of web security. So too did the fact that Assad never attached his name or initials to any of the emails he sent. However, many of the emails that arrived in his inbox are addressed to him as president and contain intimate details of events and discussions that were not known outside of the inner sanctum and would have been very difficult to manipulate. (source)
Only a dumbed-down people could be sold such a tale. The contents of the emails unsurprisingly make the case Israel wants to make.
The President’s wife apparently spent tens of thousands on chandeliers and candlesticks. Now where have we heard this before? Marie Antoinette was accused of “indulgence” when Moses Mendelssohn, Jew, commissioned a London jeweler to create a 250,000-livres diamond necklace, which was delivered to her. This was quickly followed by accusations of adultery. One thing led to another, the masses started disliking the royalty, and the French revolution was on. When France burned, Marie Antoinette was said to have stated that if the people don’t have bread to eat, let them eat cake. Jewish liars are doing the same thing today that they did during 1788-1799 in France: Asma al-Assad is living a high life, oblivious to her country burning around her!
In the leaked emails, Assad is said to have received advice from Hezbollah and the Iranian government, a nexus that Israel has been making the case for. Assad even describes his promised reforms as “rubbish laws of parties, elections, media....”!
One of the emails shows President Assad corresponding with Luna Al-Chebel, a Syrian anchor who resigned from Al-Jazeera, a TV network operating under the auspices of Jews, having had her fill of their lies and not wanting to be a participant in promoting these lies, which she later talked about in public. Luna Al-Chebel used her hotmail account, and President Assad had no issues sending correspondence to a hotmail account! Native Arabic speakers quickly determined that the people who fabricated this correspondence aren’t native Arabic speakers.
And how did the leaks come to light? The Guardian tell us that initially the Syrian opposition had gotten hold of the emails and were monitoring them, but the hacker group Anonymous hacked into the Syrian ministry of public affairs’ website and trawled through more than 80 email addresses stored on the ministry’s server, and “Somehow, someone searching through the ministry’s emails was able to establish that the Sam email belonged to the president.”
The affair is a kosher fabrication, and Anonymous, being the Jewish-funded entity it is, won’t renounce the “credit” where credit isn’t due.
Posted by R-news on Monday, July 2, 2012 at 08:49 PM in Islam & Islamification, Media, Military Matters, Political analysis, That Question Again, War on Terror, World Affairs
On the right is a Syrian “protester” carrying a poster of a dead child, captioned “Bashar Al-Assad’s Reforms.” At left is the source of the picture, a Yemeni news report on Muhammad Abdullah Yousuf Al-Saedi, a child from Yemen murdered in Yemen.
The warmongers must surely wish that they’d achieved regime change in Syria before the internet revolution.
Posted by R-news on Thursday, June 28, 2012 at 06:06 PM in Islam & Islamification, Media, Military Matters, Political analysis, That Question Again, War on Terror, World Affairs
The usual suspects have been itching to attack Syria and replace the Assad regime with one compliant with their goals. Why is this our problem? Because they’ll use our military apparatus and our people to do the dirty job, for which they’ll make us borrow money to pay for the military equipment and armed forces, and they’ll create this money out of thin air and demand we pay it back with interest, and after war there will be a refugee problem for us, and we’ll be left with fewer allies against these scum who create havoc in our nations and the rest of the globe... it goes on and on.
Because of the seriousness of the matter, it’s high time MR had a series on the phony “evidence” these Godforsaken creatures have been inundating us with to build the case for attacking Syria. Here’s something for starters.
The dailymail.co.uk had this feature on “Syria’s steroid-mad ‘Ghost’ killers who keep Assad in power by slaughtering women and children,” as in the 108 people they allegedly massacred in Houla.
The evidence offered comprises of piss-poor, pathetic, worse-than-amateur attempts at digitally edited/photoshopped images that wouldn’t pass cursory examination by anyone having superficial familiarity with image editing and human anatomy: notice the blurring where the editing has taken place; remarkable development of the biceps brachii without corresponding development of its synergist, the brachialis, and at stark odds with the relatively poor development of the deltoids; the curious instance of steroids bulking the triceps brachii such that professional male bodybuilders are put to shame but having a weak effect on the torso; etc. Unsurprisingly, dailymail.co.uk isn’t accepting comments on the article.
The creature shown is conveniently named Areen Al Assad. These evil liars need to be exposed and driven out of our nations.
Posted by R-news on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 at 10:47 PM in Islam & Islamification, Media, Military Matters, Political analysis, That Question Again, War on Terror, World Affairs
by David Hamilton
Further to the recent posts about my ordeal with The Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Unit I have been interviewed by two different officers from the CTU about imaginary links they tried to say I had with a terrorist. In the UK, the Counter Terrorism Command (CTC) are trying to build up a narrative of how the “far-right” are terrorists just like those in the Muslim community. I became ensnared in this effort because a man I never met liked a letter I wrote and posted on Facebook. This was decided on at a meeting between a senior Metropolitan Police officer and a meeting of Muslims.(1)
There is a good reason I know nothing about Anders Breivik, the man who blew up a government building and shot 76 teenage Marxists in Norway. As part of its agenda to invent home-grown “right wing terrorism,” the CTC are trying to fit me up as being an associate of Breivik, whom I’ve never met.
So now the police, who did nothing about Moslem paedophilia for years, are gearing up to fight “the racism”.
Over this last week the MSM has reported on the trial at :Liverpool Crown Court of the first eleven of forty-seven Moslem Asians, mostly Pakistanis, charges with grooming white girls for prostituting among fellow Moslem men. The charges against the defendants do not mention racism, and none of the reporting has suggested that a racist motive might be inferred from the identity of the victims. On the contrary, the reporting has been both sparse and carefully calculated to be as “non-inflammatory” as possible.
It has not worked.
Of course, the story for the Guardian was always going to be “fears” for the Neo-Marxist Utopian Tomorrow. But the story is also reported at Yahoo:
… where the nature of the Liverpool trial is too painful for the politically fastidious to share with the Yahoo reader. Fortunately, the comment facility has been carelessly left operational and, so far, over 1150 Yahoo readers have explained exactly what Englishmen think of their vibrant new countrymen. The Guardianistas are right to worry. Moslem grooming of white girls is thought by nationalists to occur wherever there are large Moslem colonies. It can only go one way now.
The Telegraph’s on-line readers love nothing more than to maul government immigration policy, and love to maul the past government’s immigration policy above everything. Threads of 2000 comments or more have become unremarkable with immigration articles. Philip Johnston - a relatively brave journalist - has notched up a modest 1080 comments in 48 hours with his piece titled The Left is rewriting Britain’s immigration history.
Obviously, serious discussion becomes quite difficult at the height of the commenting action, when posts are flying in like artillery rounds on Vimy Ridge. But when the numbers of posts and recommends are high, it does allow a certain judgement to be made about political appetites.
One such judgement concerns the popularity or otherwise of the, I presume, MI5 operation, the English Defence League, and of that anti-nationalist, Breivikian thing, anti-Jihadism in general. Judge for yourself.
Teasers aside, here’s my review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, and more. I’m not posting it below because I intend to revise it.
NO OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS, please, and stick to the facts and fact-based inference.
Posted by J Richards on Monday, September 5, 2011 at 08:18 PM in European Nationalism, Far Right, Islam & Islamification, Marxism & Culture War, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, White Nationalism, World Affairs
by David Hamilton
Acts of War are often invasions of peaceful countries but the present incidence of Muslims raping young white girls must be considered an Act of War as it is carried out by a separate and homogenous community imported into our country by the deceit of the elites against the interests of the indigenous people.
Can anyone imagine the great Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston allowing aliens to gang rape our young girls? In 1850, for the assault on British subject Don Pacifico in Greece, a foreign country, he sent the navy and blockaded their ports Greece was under the joint protection of three powers: Russia and France protested against its coercion by the British fleet and the French ambassador temporarily left London. It was the cause of Palmerston’s declaration that British subjects ought everywhere to be protected by the strong arm of the British government against injustice and wrong; comparing the reach of the British Empire to that of the Roman Empire, in which a Roman citizen could walk the earth unmolested by any foreign power.
This was the famous, five-hour speech Civis Britannicus, in which he delivered himself of this sentiment:
The low and worthless rulers we have now even cover up for aliens raping our young girls in our own towns and cities. Just compare girly Michael Gove with this great man. What an embarrassment! The sight of the elites on the BBC’s Question Time talking away this reality to cover it up was sickening. They:
The complete worthlessness of the nation-building program in Afghanistan was recently again made clear by this:
However much you might think that Brits dying to make life safe for some sort of Afghani Rainbow Coalition of feminists, gays, etc, etc. is a good idea, it should be completely clear by now that it’s impossible. The problem is not that Afghani people have their own desires frustrated by a dictatorial Taliban. The problem is that the Afghani people ARE the Taliban. They don’t like gays, they don’t like feminists, they don’t like religious apostates - and they are very willing to eradicate these objects of hate. They like rulers who share these dislikes, such as their former and current Taliban warlords.
These same patterns can be observed in Iraq, in Pakistan, in fact wherever the desires of mass Muslims have been liberated from strongman rulers and made into law.
These same patterns also hold when the co-ethnics of these liberated peoples move to the West. Britain is at the moment observing the fallout from a Pakistani arranged marriage gone wrong. How many such ticking time-bombs are ticking away? 3,000? What percentage of these end in a drive-by shooting makes for an acceptable total for violence on British soil?
The extraordinary liberal delusion is that at some point it will be possible to assimilate MEs and subcons to Western norms. Sure, it hasn’t happened yet, but they can always keep trying. The race realist answer is that genotype => phenotype. It has predictive power, and centrist apolitical Brits, as honour killings become more and more prevalent not just halfway across the world, but in towns and on roads much like the ones on which they live, will move towards it. Cant is for the good times, predictive power is for when it matters.
The debate rumbles on, Eurabists and Panglossians continue to rage at each other across a widening chasm of misunderstanding. Chistopher Caldwell’s recent book Reflections on the Revolution In Europe: Immigration, Islam, and the West has served to polarise opinion still further; all the quality rags carried a review, some praising, some damning (the latter sometimes variations on the ‘What would a bloody Sceptic know about Europe anyway?’ meme); they’re all there for the googling. Usefully, the consistently interesting Laban Tall has focused instead upon reaction within the blogosphere. His piece today More Eurabian Fantasies provides a valuable tour de horizon of the reaction from some of the more esoteric nooks and crannies of the cyber-Kommentariat to Caldwell’s thesis, in addition to his own succinct commentary.
By David Hamilton
Edmund Burke believed that politics should take account of human nature. The dominant ideologies today completely go against that and try to stifle natural expressions of common sense. In his greatest speech made in response to calls for him to be prosecuted under the 1976 Race Relations Act, The Uniform of Colour, Enoch gave an insight into how human nature operates:
The Sun of 10 November 2006 quoted Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller predicting waves of terrorist bombings, possibly with chemical and biological devices.
There is another aspect of the war being waged against us in our own country by people the elites who are bringing here. In an exposé of public interest the Daily Mail of 6 April 2009 reported:
By David Hamilton
If anything defeats common sense it is trying to understand how the “Establishment”, the “elites,” apprehend the world around them. They really seem to believe that somehow out of this ghastly racial chaos a sweet multi-racial harmony will emerge.
It is a neo-Marxist view that after chaos or breakdown there will come not the workers’ paradise of previous Marxist fantasies, but a multi-racial utopia. Margaret Hodge, then Employment Minister, made a similar point two years ago when she acknowledged problems in her Barking constituency, then added it will be alright when we become a multi racial-society … as if this would appear by magic. In practice though, they are destroying innocent people’s lives but don’t care because it makes them feel morally superior over those who do suffer..
On BBC Radio 4’s Moral Maze in August 2007 the multi-racialist panel talked and talked about an ideal future … but never faced what is happening in the world around them. In Alien Nation journalist and economist Peter Brimelow, described these people as “immigration enthusiasts” - like religious enthusiasts the emotion is more important than thinking rationally. They almost have an orgasm when talking about asylum seekers or granting amnesties.
They do not take human nature into account when discussing race-relations as they do when running their personal life, and can only deal with reality by pretending that ethnics are assimilating or have given up their identities and traditional loyalties. If they do discuss events they employ a little verbal sophistry to avoid the stark reality. Con Coughlin, daily Telegraph columnist and author of books on the Middle East and terrorism wrote on 16 December 2008, of “young Britons” attacking their own country:-
By David Hamilton
Gordon Brown and Business Secretary Lord Mandelson went to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states in the first week of November 2008 to ask them to fund our faltering economies by putting billions into the International Monetary Fund.
In return they offered them some control over Britain and the West. The Saudi regime is the motor behind Islamisation of the West. It is Saudi’s Wahhabi form of Islam which, together with the Shi’ites in Iran, aims to make Islam dominant in the world. Saudi money has financed the spread of Wahhabi mosques, preachers and educational institutions in this country promoting holy war and converting thousands of British Muslims.
Saudi Wahhabism seeks to conquer the West through a pincer movement comprising violence on the one hand and cultural infiltration on the other, and our Prime Minister is colluding with them. Lord Mandelson admitted that the Saudis and other Gulf states would get more influence in global institutions in return:-
Islamic influence is spreading into our cultural life as the Arabic investors buy Western institutions. Manchester City F C is now owned by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi; Barclays Bank, has had almost £6 billion invested from Abu Dhabi and Qatar.
BUT IT’S STILL ON YOUTUBE
Yesterday’s original post ...
Geert Wilders’ has now found a host on-line for his much trailed and relentlessly tragic film, Fitna the Movie. It is in Dutch, but scarcely needs translation. It is too uncomplicated for that. [Actually here is the English-language version, with my thanks to Hibernia Girl - Ed]
Let it be said that Wilders’ message of Islam’s alien-ness and its implacable opposition to Western liberal democratic values is unmoderated by any political context. OK, one wouldn’t expect too much of a critique of those values in a short film like this. But the responsibility for transferring Moslem populations into Europe - and apparently they now stand at 57 million - goes totally unaddressed. The viewer is left to assume that it’s simply a product of Islam’s expansionist ambitions.
Likewise, no attempt is made to investigate the nature of Moslem anger towards the West. The vast offence that Moslems feel at America’s machinations in the dar al-Islam and the humiliation occasioned by Israeli aggression are not touched upon. All the blood-letting is portrayed as a product of the “problematic” surahs.
We all know Wilders has a penchant for populist anti-immigration politics. But Wikipedia helpfully explains that he also has a very special feeling, not to put too fine a point on it, for Israel:-
So perhaps Wilders is not all that interested in telling his own people that, fundamentally, Moslems are in Holland for the same reason that 1,350 Dutch soldiers are in Iraq. Perhaps his pro-Israel sensibilities baulk at the very notion of a mutual separation - them from us and us from them. After all, no employee in the Israeli Embassy would want to see a Dutch Holland or a West careless of its “duty” to the Jewish state.
View Fitna, with all its shock value, as an agitprop vehicle for an ambitious and energetic politician. A serious contribution it aint.
“Can European Civilisation Survive?” the publicity asks. Not without Europeans, one must reply.
But Identity Crisis, a two-day chatter starting this very day (Thursday) at the European University of Rome, does not concern itself with us. This is Judeo-Christian country. What happens to Europeans doesn’t matter, so long as Western Civ can be salvaged in an executable form for the godly and the
The moving spirit of the conference appears to be Avi Davis, a man of many talents according to his bio, since he is an attorney, documentarian (?), senior fellow of the American Freedom Alliance, and a senior editorial columnist for Jewsweek, among other Israel-gripped rags.
What Avi and his friends are up to here should be pretty plain. They are trying to shape the countours of future government opinion. You can tell it’s government opinion-forming they are interested in because their method - the international conferences, the “scholarly studies”, the complex little knot of “Institutes” and “Forums” - is the same as that employed by the New Left when it culturalised discourse in the 1980s. They have money, as the left surely had money - and no doubt from some rather similar sources. They have some influence, at least, in places of power on both sides of the Atlantic. And they have an enemy: not European Man this time but Islam in and beyond Europe.
They are cultural preservationists, I suppose. They are not like us. We set out to preserve the greatest of peoples while Jews see only anti-Semitism in that sacred goal, and Christians see the worship of a craven image. To the question, “Should European peoples be free to live as they please, and with whom they please, in their own lands” these people would be constitutionally unable to answer in the positive.
So is Avi’s effort a help or hindrance to our goal. Well, right now the discussion at high levels in European politics of Islam as a threat in itself is not unhelpful to nationalist parties like VB and the BNP. And since the true political and philosophical nature of nationalism is too revolutionary to be entertained at any level of government, there is no material loss to us if Jews and Christians push the anti-Islamification agenda successfully.
But, of course, the point arrives when civilisation as a value in itself misses the mark. It is to genetic survival what citizenism is to blut und boden. It will contribute nothing to our cause, other than the educational experience of seeing the opinion-forming exercise professionally - and lavishly - undertaken.
In the book World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, by Norman Podhoretz, 2007, and in live interviews that he has been giving lately, he emphasizes that only Islamofascists were able to kill thousands of Americans on American soil in one devastating strike, something not even the axis powers during WWII were capable of doing. His claim seems to be that this new enemy is every bit as dangerous as the highly trained and advanced armies, for their time, as Germany and Japan. Podhoretz and his kin are desperately trying to keep the United States engaged in regime change in the Middle East, and of course spinning “just so” stories is an easy way to keep the sheeple terrified of this new threat.
With regards to 9/11 of course, we were to blame—not the sophistication of the terrorists. I came across this quite well detailed acknowledgment of our dereliction by Max Bazerman in Judgment in Managerial Decision Making:
“Enron is not the only disaster that we can trace to failed decision making. Faulty decisions played an important role in the weakness of the U.S. aviation security system that allowed terrorists to use airplanes as weapons on September 11, 2001. The U.S. government knew terrorists were willing to become martyrs for their cause and that they hated the United States. The World Trade Center had been bombed in 1993, and in 1994 terrorists hijacked an Air France airplane and tried to turn it into a missile aimed at the Eiffel Tower. In 1995, terrorists failed in an attempt to hijack twelve U.S. commercial airplanes in Asia at the same time. In addition, the general public knew how simple it was to board an airplane with items, such as small knives, that could be used as weapons. In 1997, Vice President Al Gore’s aviation security commission put all of this data together and provided comprehensive evidence that the system was full of holes. Yet despite the warning signs, the Clinton administration did little to improve airline safety.
Those who frequently roam the streets of Brussels can remember hardly a day on which there isn’t a demonstration for or against something outside one of the European offices. We’ve even had the garbage men whose brooms were the wrong size. On average, five hundred demos a year are approved in the European Union capital, approximately two per working-day.
As one would expect of a liberal democracy, only about once a year is a demo actually forbidden, and then only where the direct incitement of a felony is involved, and by felony I mean murder, child abuse or genocide. Otherwise, the most bizarre and absurd demos are routinely permitted.
Nevertheless, Brussels mayor Freddy Thielemans forbade a demo for the 11th of this month, the anniversary of the attacks on New York and Washington. The demo, which included a minute’s silence for the victims of 9/11, had been announced as a protest against the on-going Islamicisation of Europe, and specifically against the introduction of Shariah law. It’s not an unpopular cause in Brussels – or in many other places. The ban didn’t go unnoticed (in German) in Europe and in America. Nor did the fact that, embarrassingly for mayor Thielemans, only two days earlier a demo by United for Truth, an organisation that claims that the US government and Mossad were behind the 9/11 attacks, had been permitted.
I came across a 1999 report prepared by the Federal Research Division, Library of Congress, entitled The Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why? It should be available on the Internet, and if not I have a copy. It makes for some interesting reading with regards to current forms of terrorism and how difficult it is to defeat—should that be one’s primary concern.
The report traces the history of terrorism over the last few decades, and points out that earlier secular terrorists “want a lot of people watching, not a lot of people dead.” During the 90s however, secular or idealistic terrorists gave way to religious fundamentalist terrorism that is not averse to using WMD for killing masses of people. After all, they are on a mission from God or Allah and what others think is irrelevant. This includes millenarian, messianic or apocalyptic fanatics. What is interesting is that the Christian millenarian fundamentalists in the United States mirror the Islamic terrorists’ jihadist mission—only Islamists are acting on orders directly from Allah, and the Christians are waiting for promised events to occur with little help from besides supporting Israel. In the end, the result is the same in the slaughter of innocents.
Ed Husain, author of The Islamist, comments:
If those two are the only options (and when even a co-ethnic of most Muslims says that they are, we surely should believe him) containment is surely the humane solution.
The standing advice provided by the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office for British travellers to Saudi Arabia includes the following:-
Nowhere does the FO specifically state that Western men and women will be punished if they are caught dancing with one another in private. That, in the event, might turn out to have been something of an oversight:-
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa