Category: U.S. Politics
Let’s start with acknowledged instances of the use of nuclear weapons and some officially unacknowledged ones.
Posted by R-news on Sunday, December 8, 2013 at 03:29 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Military Matters, Political analysis, Science & Technology, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, War on Terror, World Affairs
According to Salvador Astucia, the singlemost important reason behind the assassination of JFK was JFK’s attempt to establish détente with the Soviet Union. Let’s see why this was a big issue.
Posted by R-news on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 at 01:54 PM in Books, Economics & Finance, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Military Matters, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
J.P. Mroz has written a three-part essay titled Will the Real Wikipedia Please Stand Up?: http://www.ctka.net/2010/wiki.html.
The essay is related to the futility of trying to correct blatant disinformation on Wikipedia pages regarding the JFK assassination. What is the “real Wikipedia” according to Mroz? It’s simply what Wikipedia claims to be: a wiki edited by the general public, and one that maintains a neutral viewpoint. Mroz’s problems at Wikipedia certainly haven’t stemmed from his being in the minority. In the U.S., surveys have shown that two-thirds to three-fourths of the population doesn’t buy the lone assassin/Oswald claim. So how does one explain Wikipedia “neutrality”?
Posted by R-news on Saturday, November 23, 2013 at 03:57 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
The previous parts established that JFK was killed by at least three hitmen: Lucien Sarti and the other two likely François Chiappe and Jean-Paul Angeletti. Hired guns are mercenaries, and have no personal stake in the matter. This part addresses the people who hired these hitmen.
The following factors would’ve motivated the murder of JFK:
Posted by R-news on Friday, November 22, 2013 at 11:28 AM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
This part addresses the assassins of JFK.
JFK’s would-be assassination was revealed a month before his murder. The revealer was U.S. army cryptographer Eugene B. Dinkin. An early source of this information is Bloody Treason by Noel Twyman, and it’s mentioned in LBJ, the Mastermind of the JFK Assassination by Phillip Nelson. The following excerpts from Nelson’s book are found on pages 360-362:
What happened to Dinkin? From Phillip Nelson we have:
Posted by R-news on Thursday, November 21, 2013 at 02:28 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
The 50th anniversary of JFK’s murder is on Nov. 22, 2013. Some believe that before 9/11, the JFK murder was the greatest game-changing event in the century that has passed. I don’t know whether this assertion is correct, but the event had major significance, and it’s time to take a look at the JFK murder.
Part 1 addresses whether the official story about who killed JFK is correct.
Posted by R-news on Wednesday, November 20, 2013 at 02:01 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
by Leon Haller
On Tuesday June 11, 2013, at 2:15pm EST, the United States Senate is going to begin the process of destroying America as we have known it. At this time, the Senate will be voting on Senate Bill 744, which is the first step in granting a “path to citizenship” to the estimated 30 MILLION illegal aliens (99%+ non-white) occupying our country. Given horrendous other provisions in the bill dramatically increasing legal immigration, in addition to the insanely generous “family reunification” provisions already present in American immigration policy, this is the first step in the last stage (begun in 1965) of what will be the certain white minoritization of the US (with this bill, by 2020-25), to be followed by the collapse of the USA into brutal white persecution (starting 2030-35) if not actual genocide (by 2040-45, and no later than 2050).
Think Rhodesia/South Africa as our White American future.
[Of course, the Fall of White America is going to be an event of world-historical import for all the European peoples, especially in light of the economic as well as domestic racial (and indigenous demographic decline) problems in Europe today. Given how European governments are idiotically slashing their defense budgets in desperate attempts to avoid the day of reckoning with their own failed socialist welfare states, who will defend Old Europe when the young, fecund and ideologically radicalizing Maghreb rises up and looks northward, and America has disappeared?]
To move forward S.744 needs 60 “Yes” votes.
WE CAN DEFEAT THIS AMNESTY TODAY!
There are 45 Republican Senators. At least 4 are traitors on the scale of Judas Iscariot (McCain, Graham, Flake and, of course, Rubio). But if the others hang tough, or if we can augment their number with a few rural state Democrats, we can stop this treason cold!
It depends on the plain people of America showing their patriotism - NOW!!
Call as many Senators (esp Republicans) as possible, telling them to vote NO today on moving forward on the S.744 amnesty bill. I have called 31 so far (not to mention past email messages), along with my two worthless CA Democrats.
Toll free number for Capitol switchboard (they will connect you to whichever Senate offices you ask for) is:
Here are the Senators. I have eliminated both the worthless against us (eg, Schumer, McCain), and the exceptional with us (eg, Sessions, Cruz), and bolded the most important remaining ones to call (“important” because they are most amenable to influence; ie, either they haven’t firmly committed to Yes or No, or they are moderate Democrats / liberal Republicans who need to hear grass-roots opposition; or they are retiring and might do the right thing for the American working class; or they are Rubio and Graham, the former of whom is now waffling on his own bill, the latter of whom is up for re-election next year).
GW has expressed the constraint:
DanielS has expressed the constraint:
An approach offered by John Harland is to admit the historicity of Jesus in His essential mythic image as descendant of God evidenced in his own over-ruling of texts with direct bodily connection with God as Father, but to deny the historicity of the extant texts—deny them as yet another means by which dastards attempt to interpose themselves between the God-heritage of individuals and their Father, in spirit and flesh.
Ridicule of Harland’s own editing of the texts to suit his view may be conducted only at the sacrifice of the two constraints establishing the context of this presentation. Offer a superior approach if you don’t like Harland’s—either that or declare folly the entire effort to connect with the spiritual force of Christianity.
Click this link for a pdf document containing part of Harland’s account starting with “The Germans” (in the anthropological sense meaning what many identify as Celtic and Nordic pagans of the pre-Christian era), “The Catholic Church Promotes Judeo-Christianity”, “The First Breaking Apart of the Church Serpent” (regarding Henry VIII and Martin Luther), “A Further Break From the Serpent” (regarding the establishment of America), “The Strange Phenomenon of ‘Money-Mad’ Americans” (regarding the closing of the frontier and replacement of Nature and Nature’s God with money-based “culture”), “The American Dream” (the commodification, by conspirators, of the American spiritual renaissance), “The German Reich” (the parallel processes occurring in what became the nation state known as “Germany” during the 1800s leading up to WW I), “The World Picture After WW I” (the situation leading up to WW II) and the concluding section of this pdf document is “The Second World War”.
The entire book is “Word Controlled Humans” by John Harland, ISBN 0-914752-12-X available from Sovereign Press, 326 Harris Road, Rochester, WA 98579 (with which I have no business or personal relationship).
Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 at 08:37 PM in Anthropology, Archeology, Books, Christianity, Conservatism, European culture, History, National Socialism, Political Philosophy, Psychology, Revisionism, Social Sciences, The Ontology Project, U.S. Politics
Notwithstanding the vast amount of straitening post-election commentary that has appeared across the right-wing media, I thought it might be in order to offer one or two thoughts of my own. Apologies now to anyone who doesn’t mind if they never read another word about this sorry issue!
As every politically-minded person has surely realised, the impressive block-voting of non-whites has put demographics at the centre of political calculation. The GOP in its current form is already electorally obsolete. Two-thirds of a static white electorate will never again be sufficient to command an electoral majority. The one-third of white Americans, particularly single women, voting Democrat were already gestured towards by the GOP’s rejection of Bachman, Cain, Santorum, Gingrich, and the libertarian Constitutionalist Ron Paul. Romney was supposed a flip-flopper, a RINO, and therefore electable to all those Republican voters lost in 2008. Now he is the point from which the party has to migrate to find a majority. It has to reach out to blacks and Hispanics, and it cannot even rely any more on conservative minorities like Alan West.
For mainstream political observers the interesting question is how the GOP will adapt to this new reality and retain its present constituencies. Nationalists, however, already know that the constant pursuit of conservative movements is not principle but relevance. Ultimately, it’s about power, and nothing is likely to change this time. The party managers will take the Christian Right for granted. After all, where can it go without entirely marginalising itself? The new party line will say little that is critical of illegal migrants, abortion, or homosexual politics. It will trumpet a more anti-statist and economically liberal platform. This, in turn, will redefine the political centre, and narrow the national debate even further, and that will generate a new bout of radicalism on the left.
Now let’s look for a few aspects in this of particular interest to nationalists.
Four years ago Barack Hussein Obama II was elected to the office of President of the United States of America. It was something new, and while everybody in White Nationalism saw the “hope” nonsense and the “change” nonsense for what it was, by no means every White Nationalist was unhappy about Obama’s victory. Some even voted for him.
There was, of course, another, darker, grittier hope of change, born in the belief that, inevitably, white Americans would be pushed closer to, and perhaps even beyond, what they can bear. The hand of federal government control would grow heavy. The economy would slump. The taxes would increase. The racial injustice would mount. Everything in the white American life would become worse, and not by a little but a lot. Anger, frustration and cynicism would take hold. A search for alternatives beyond the GOP, beyond the prescribed news of the media, would take hold too, and WN’s long hoped-for change in the somnolence of white America would come closer.
Well, we got the Tea Party and Arizona SB 1070, I suppose. But tomorrow the incumbent is expected by most onlookers to secure his second term. So what do WNs expect “worse-wise” from that, and how do they assess the viability of the “worse is better” scenario? Are we seeing any movement at all in the white American thrall to the mainstream? What, after all, would it look like? How long would it take to become obvious? And what, if anything, can be expected to develop in the next four years?
Harold Armstead Covington (born September 14, 1953 in Burlington, North Carolina) is an American white supremacist, political activist, and novelist. He advocates the creation of an “Aryan homeland” in the Pacific Northwest region of the United States.
In 1974, he worked for a construction company in Johannesburg, South Africa for about six months, and then went to Rhodesia and joined the Rhodesian Army. In 1976 he was deported from Rhodesia for his activities with the proto-NS Rhodesia White People’s Party, along with two of his fellow Americans, Eric Thomson and Jeffrey Spencer. He was deported on the personal orders of Ian Smith.
In 2000, Covington came out openly for territorial White separatism in the form of the Northwest Imperative.
The Northwest Imperative is based on the conviction, that the United States of America in its present form is doomed, and that it is necessary to the physical survival of the White race that a Homeland be established.
I’ve taken flak for describing Ron Paul as controlled opposition. Here I’ll discuss his stance on money. I was pointed to the following overview of Ron Paul on the money issue to correct my alleged misrepresentation of his stances.
Ron Paul argues against more regulation [on the part of the government] and pitches for a free market economy by saying that the Fed should not be given more power, whereas giving the Fed more power means less regulation by the government as the Federal Reserve banks are fully private; the more power the Fed has, the greater the influence of the “free market.”
Ron Paul addresses the housing bubble by saying that Congress and the Fed encouraged the housing industry... finally the bubble burst and “we” [government] try to [pursue stupid policies] such as stimulating the housing market, cash for clunkers.... as a result “we” have no confidence in the market economy.
Reality check: the housing bubble and its busting was caused by the bankers a.k.a. the “free market”:
Boom: generously give out loans, which are funded out of nothing, to earn interest off of nothing...
Laughing all the way to the bank: make money by selling debt that can’t be paid off to investors, make money by selling insurance against the probability of defaults, make money by gambling on the probability of defaults...
Bust: loan less and cause a recession; acquire houses for pennies on the dollar.
Another reality check: The only money created by the government comprises of coins. Stimulating the housing market and cash for clunkers is just the bankers getting the government and hence the people more under debt.
Many should know that wikileaks is a 100% kosher undertaking. The leaks comprise of data that are easily falsified in part. The leaks embarrass America or Arabs, not Israel. The leaks are about relatively trivial matters but never serious issues such as central banks being private banks, not government banks. The “whistleblowers” don’t just maintain official versions of major events such as 9/11 but ridicule dissent as nonsense that detracts from the “serious work” they’re doing with their exposes! The U.S. ICE (Israeli Content Enforcement) agency of the Department of Homeland Security, which seizes domains willy nilly for copyright infringement, hasn’t bothered with wikileaks. And so on…
Some crucial leaks were said to have been provided by Private Bradley Manning to Julian Assange. Both men look effeminate, and one would think they’re homos, which makes for bad PR. So they put on a show where Assange was accused of raping two Swedish women, making him appear a macho man, and used the ruckus to attract attention to wiki leaks. All this would be amusing if it weren’t for the plight of Bradley Manning, who’s been imprisoned in solitary confinement, cut off from friends and family. Long-term incarceration in such circumstances is designed to break people down and make them confess to anything you want them to.
Manning’s trial is currently under way by Americans even though he is British, and there isn’t much that can be done to prevent him from being convicted of bogus charges, but you can help expose the sham to others and make it embarrassing for those working for the Israelis behind the wikileaks scam to be who they are.
Or 71% of her, anyway.
The Daily Telegraph has launched a VoteMatch application for the candidates in the 2012 Republican primaries (minus John Huntsman for some reason).
Mind you, it might not work. Telegraph scribbler Tim Stanley took the test:
And this Darwinian is a Creationist!
This anomaly appears to be the strongest evidence of a White House conspiracy, and the only evidence for which I have not yet seen some explanation, however weak. The strategy appears to be for the White House to remain disdainfully aloof while the liberal media, even abroad, counters where it can but chiefly pronounces on the sanity of mind of those who persist with their questions. But it will only take one unanswered and possibly unanswerable question like the one above to corrode what gains this can deliver. And if that happens, the further entrenchment of opposition to this presidency is inevitable. There will never be a full and final disclosure. Congress will never impeach or investigate Obama. But what odds his surviving to fight for a second-term?
But ... is this scenario good for white America? What, going forward, would be the optimum operational circumstances for White Nationalism to advance? An exposed and shamed non-American president and a chastened Establishment? A resurgent Republican Party, powerfully informed by populist conservative instincts (but likely led by Mitt Romney)? Really? The experience of political nationalism in Europe strongly suggests that a second Obama term mired in public distrust and bitterness is a certain generator of division, and division eventually turns to radicalism.
I’m not an American, and I know I miss a lot of the finer points of American political life. But even I know that one effective opposition, if only a conservative-libertarian opposition, has been grown in Obama’s America. WNs who aren’t attracted to the gradualism of Hunter and Co should hope to keep the black guy in the White House. Even if he was born in darkest Mombasa, and never came closer than a snowflake to an Hawaiian maternity ward.
by Donald Miller
The collapse of the Obama spending machine has a long way to go yet, especially with regard to pilfering the earnings and savings of European Americans. There are many ways Obama & Bernanke can confiscate your income and wealth to establish a multiracial nation.
GREAT GOLD CONFISCATION
To understand some of this, it may be necessary for you to review the history of the great gold confiscation of 1933:
RAPID INFLATION NOT SUITABLE
There are fundamentally only three ways to repay the Obama-Bernanke indebtedness—I disregard massive inflation because it would take too long to be effective and, if it happened too quickly, we’d begin to understand the Weimar Republic (1919-1933) really well and up close:
Although this isn’t addressing the primary cause of the loss of legitimacy—immigration enforced on the states with integration enforced on citizens—this is a very positive development. The primary danger here is that some “higher power”, such as a North American Union if not the United Nations, will attempt to disintermediate the relationship between the States and the Federal Government—using this crisis as an opportunity to increase the de facto centralization while, in effect, nullifying the US Constitution.
In any case, the time is coming for action.
Thanks to Bo for this video of Robert Reich and Charles Rangel at an Economic Recovery Plan meeting on 7th January.
Today the $825 billion economic stimulus package was marked up by the House Ways & Means Committee. It includes money for infrastructure, health care and education projects. But little to none of it will be coming your way if you are white or middle-class.
Bo Sears sent me the link to an Antiwar.com post with a Fox News interview of Tony Blankley, an Englishman turned American turned lawyer turned journalist turned Jewish extended phenotype who denies he is a neocon. But Blankley has a new book out titled American Grit in which he pans Obama’s ideas about national service and calls for “a full-on military draft”.
Now, it happens that Bo and the RD guys have already predicted the return of the draft:-
So Blankley’s timely arrival with the self-same idea is not entirely unexpected. The intriguing question is: Does a connected guy like Blankley think it up all by himself, or does he get fed it by a Nameless Other or two?
Fr. John sent me this WorldNetDaily link to an article on the Obama birth certificate embroglio. WoldNetDaily is one of the small handful of slightly off-colour organisations that is campaigning to up-end Obama’s inauguration.
I really can’t see this or any similar effort disaccomodating the executive too much. The latter will more than tough it out, quashing each legal challenge with utter disdain - a response licenced by the curious and studied indifference of the GOP as to whether the man elected to serve as America’s 44th president is eligible by birth for office. At any other time we would see the defeated candidate’s party crawling all over something like this. Heck, look how they pursued slick Willy for his paltry little indiscretion with “that woman”. By comparison, Obama may be engaged in a staggeringly cynical electoral charade. And it gets worse once he is sworn in:-
Wrotnowski and Donofrio would very likely have triggered the “avoid” mechanism that serious politicians reserve for conspiracy theorists. Lightfoot, a CA libertarian, seems more substantial, but still unlikely in the extreme to break the presidential mould. But the Berg petition is said to be not at all frivolous, and is the one that requires the president elect’s elusive long form birth certificate to be produced.
So why are the Republicans to a man looking the other way? Not wanting to appear ungracious losers? Not wanting to show disloyalty to the Washington insiders and the wider political class? Not wanting to associate with a bunch of oddball fringe activists? Not wanting to gamble on bringing the house down on the Obama victory, only to find that the long form certificate does, in fact, contain the word “Hawaii”? Not wanting to re-fight the presidential election?
1. That the off-script longeurs and foot-in-mouth bloomers we expect from president Obama waste no time in coming, and quickly sour his honeymoon with the white American voter.
2. That “change” is quickly revealed to mean blacks being “served” by white volunteerism in various forms, with whites supposedly gaining from “seeing through their own prejudice”. And no, it doesn’t fly. Not for an instant.
3. That white America will begin to suspect that mainstream political America as a whole has no use for it whatsoever beyond its votes and taxes, and its “contribution” to the ethnic spoils system.
4. That the economic rigours of the year ahead cause many more white Americans to question the value of the neoliberal system, of the banking system, of fiat money.
5. That Hollywood can’t make a buck out of its anti-white “entertainment”.
6. That the falling value of university endowments cuts into the best efforts of university faculty to damage and discriminate against White students.
7. That when white Americans think of Israel they remember the Gaza Strip, not “America’s best little buddy”.
8. That when White Nationalists speak of racial politics they remember they are being heard by intelligent and discerning fellow whites.
9. That more White Nationalists will reject the anti-political notion that all they need is less Jewish power and more white racial consciousness.
10. That White Nationalists will discover that freedom and justice, as much as love, are theirs, and theirs alone, to espouse.
Happy New Year to you all.
Just time for one last blast before the US election - this one from Martin Hutchinson at Prudent Bear.
The number of economically damaging policy ideas imposed on the United States has greatly increased in the last few months. However from the statements of the Presidential candidates, the next few years may turn this storm of bad ideas into a blizzard. Those with an emotional attachment to the US economy should brace themselves for trauma.
The new salience of bad economic ideas is not particularly surprising. The US economy is heading into an economic downturn that promises to be at least as severe as those of 1974 and 1980-82, whose memory is already fading a generation into the past. Additionally, the 2000-07 period was one in which US voters made very small if any income gains, with such gains arising only through refinancing of ever more gigantic home mortgages. Meanwhile the distant and dislikeable titans of Wall Street apparently scooped up all the money generated by the economy.
Now the housing bubble has burst, the average jaundiced voter naturally sees the free market system and the George W. Bush administration as responsible for the recent not-particularly-pleasant years and the economic horror that has followed. Claims by Republican politicians that the debacle was all the fault of the housing finance agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while partly true are wholly unconvincing.
With voters miserable and facing a disastrous economic position that they believe was caused by free market excesses, it is not surprising that they are looking favorably on statist nostrums. Both political candidates have propounded bad ideas; Obama more than McCain largely because he has more ideas in general. In addition, there are a few bad ideas that have embedded themselves into the system, accepted by both political candidates and the political class as a whole.
By Bo Sears
A mystery has revealed itself before our eyes. It lies in the concluding portion of US Senator Joe Biden’s speech at a Seattle fund-raiser. His unsettling prediction is that a test of the next president will be “manufactured“ early in his incumbency. But, most oddly, it will require ordinary Democrat voters and Obama supporters to show solidarity with their man and use their “influence within the community”.
What kind of test can Biden mean?
Here is the text taken from Alexander Cockburn’s piece on CounterPunch posted this weekend.
So let’s try to answer Cockburn’s question. These are the key elements Biden provides.
1. “President Obama” is going to be tested early, as Kennedy was tested in Cuba in 1962. Possibly by Russia. Possibly in the Middle-East.
2. He will respond militarily, not diplomatically. This response will appear flat-wrong to many Americans. National unity itself will be at risk. The same kind of belief and support that elected Obama to office will be required to keep him there.
My colleagues and I have considered all kinds of situations in which a new president might need local community leaders to follow him blindly in some new foreign adventure. The only one we can see that would be nation-shaking … the only one that would fit in the model of a black president and a dangerous military entanglement abroad, and which would give rise to the circumstance where lots of local support had to be brought behind him, would be the re-introduction of the draft.
Young white Americans may not be willing to risk their lives for a black Commander-in-Chief. For sure, it is hard to believe that present-day American college students are any more eager to be cut up, shot, and killed in 2009 than they were in Johnson’s Vietnam.
The image this calls to mind is the draft-dodging of the Vietnam era. But Canada has already signalled its willingness to reject young diverse white Americans fleeing from a draft (along with other young Americans). So the easy escape is blocked:-
I don’t expect we’ll see the rebellious young with flowers in their hair this time. And their natural recourse won’t be the ideals of the radical left and won’t be black civil rights, because these are the values of the political Establishment today.
But have you got any other ideas of substantive policy initiatives that couldn’t be implemented with only the powers in the presidency and the Congress … initiatives that would require wide-ranging local public support?
Bo Sears is a director of ResistingDefamation
The Philadelphia Daily News, a struggling tabloid owned by the Catholic, former Bush publicist Brian Tierney, has managed to inform its - as Bo and Stanley would say - diverse white American readership that they or their cousins are “crackers”. Here’s the offending extract from John Baer’s column on Tuesday:-
So how did that go down? Do Bo and Stanley have a point? A considerable majority of the 294 comments says they do. Here is a selection of the later ones:-
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa