Category: Race realism

A new look at inbreeding/outbreeding as an evolutionary adaptation.

When it comes to miscegenation, or marrying and having children between races, there has often been the assumption that what is called “hybrid vigor” is beneficial. I will explain here where this comes from, and why in nature there is a balance between inbreeding and outbreeding, and how this balance seems to have some natural causes that promotes an organism’s replication. Let me start with breeds of dogs because they are a good example of human races.

I was brought up to believe that mongrel dogs would be healthier than pure bred dogs, because pure bred dogs, through inbreeding, carried a lot of recessive genes (the correct term is allele, but I will use the more common term gene). When recessive genes for particular defects are common in any population, there is a higher probability that a dog or a human will inherit both recessive genes and suffer from the disease. So, is it better to not inbreed dogs for particular traits, because of the higher proportion of recessive genes? Well, if we did so we would through out the baby with the bathwater. What would breeds of dogs be if we did not breed for particular traits, which also inadvertently carry with the breeding program some genetic diseases?

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Saturday, February 12, 2005 at 10:06 AM in Race realism
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

Racial segregation now politically correct!

“Ontario schools have failed black students by having too few teachers of colour, too few courses on black thought and a zero tolerance code that hits black students hardest, charges a leading Canadian researcher into race and schooling.  And sociology professor George Dei drew an explosion of applause from a crowd of 500 last night when he called for black alternative schools to right some of these wrongs.

Continued...

Posted by jonjayray on Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 08:01 PM in Race realism
Comments (2) | Tell-a-Friend

Down among the double digits

There is a belief dear to the more intellectual if sometimes extreme political elements that political power on the ground is nought but the ebb and flow of a great battle of ideas.  Thus philosophy is both the king of abstract human contemplation and the pawn of human instrumentation.

The Achilles heel of this view is that Nature is also expressed, and rather viscerally, through our hearts and minds and thence through our deeds.  But Nature is not an idea.  The battles between “isms” have no application to it.  Even race realism, for example, is only about Nature - just intellectuals protesting an anti-Natural ideology.

That is not to say that Nature cannot speak pretty directly through us.  It can.  But do you want to listen?

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, January 20, 2005 at 06:36 AM in Race realism
Comments (5) | Tell-a-Friend

Should felons with low mental ability be let off?

In the United States, every time some murderer with a low IQ is found guilty, it is argued that they should be spared the death penalty because they are not intelligent enough to know right from wrong, or some other excuse why stupid people should not be held as accountable as smart people.

What fascinates me about this position is that it is promoted by the same Leftists who deny that intelligence: a) can be tested with any certainty; b) that intelligence determines worth; c) that poor people have “street smarts” if not “academic smarts” so everyone is intelligent; d) refuse to accept that Blacks on average have low intelligence; e) Blacks are ten times more likely to go to jail for crimes because of prejudice, not because of their low intelligence. I could go on and on but these are a few anomalies that come to mind. When it comes to intelligence, the Left does not like to compare people, but are willing to use it whenever they can tip the balance towards helping minorities. Most of these “too stupid to be held accountable” cases in the United States are low IQ Blacks. But what does IQ have to do with criminal punishment?

Continued...

Posted by Matt Nuenke on Monday, January 17, 2005 at 06:33 PM in Race realism
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend

The Barbarians Have Crossed the Danube

Out of martial weakness or apathy the Romans allowed the Goths to settle across the Danube in 376 AD, a terrible precedent was established; soon the entire frontier was populated by rampaging barbarians.

Not content with being a cook, meat-packer or gardener, Jose Sandoval, Jorge Galindo and Eric Fernando Vela, all foreign barbarians, slaughtered five White Americans during a bank robbery, in a quiet Nebraska town, in September of 2002.

Today, Jose Sandoval, 25, was sentenced to death in the electric chair for his role in the robbery. Murdered were: Evonne Tuttle, 37; Lola Elwood, 43; Lisa Bryant, 29; and Samuel Sun, 50;

We can only guess what words were uttered by Sandoval’s victims before they were slaughtered.

Perhaps like Dutch filmaker Theo Van Gogh, murdered by an Islamic extremist, they said: “Have mercy, have mercy, don’t do it”. And perhaps, as when Chai Vang, a Hmong immigrant that executed five White Americans in Wisconsin,  he replied: “What you’re not dead yet?”

Posted by leslie on Friday, January 14, 2005 at 02:32 PM in Race realism
Tell-a-Friend

Ten consequences of the right being right about race.

By “the right”, of course, I mean those of us who care for truth and for our own people, neither one to the exclusion of the other.

By “right” I mean that the liberals and egalitarians, the elitists, the sensibility merchants, the anti-white racists, the politically correct, the identity artists, the rights artists, the self-haters, the liberty junkies, the complacent and the sleeping are all utterly, ingloriously WRONG!

So, a little naked truth-speaking …

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, January 5, 2005 at 05:24 AM in Race realism
Comments (15) | Tell-a-Friend