Category: Far Right
On 22 July, 2011, Israel commemorated the 65th anniversary of the King David Hotel’s bombing in Palestine, by exploding bombs in Oslo, killing 8, and shooting dead 69 on Utøya Island. Israelis picked Norway for the celebrations because she had increasingly become sympathetic toward Muslims and in favor of a Palestinian State. Professor Ola Tunander concurred that only a State-level entity equivalent has the capability of pulling off such an operation, and this wouldn’t be the Norwegian administration slaughtering relatives on Utøya Island. Tunander knows Israel did it, but to avoid the heat, hinted at it, saying that some have suggested it was Israel’s handiwork. Given Tunander’s academic credentials, the mainstream media decided to keep Tunander’s analysis and the Israeli condemnation of it out of the Anglosphere.
At first it wasn’t clear whether the mysterious individual blamed for the attacks, Anders Behring Breivik, was a scapegoat or patsy. But the cues were there though overlooked by many. One clue was Anders Breivik’s amazing beard, capable of changing within seconds.
Posted by R-news on Sunday, July 22, 2012 at 01:35 PM in European Nationalism, Far Right, Global Elitism, Liberalism & the Left, Marxism & Culture War, Media, New Right, Political analysis, Popular Culture, Psychology, Social liberalism, That Question Again, White Nationalism, World Affairs
Teasers aside, here’s my review of 2083: A European Declaration of Independence, and more. I’m not posting it below because I intend to revise it.
NO OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS, please, and stick to the facts and fact-based inference.
Posted by J Richards on Monday, September 5, 2011 at 08:18 PM in European Nationalism, Far Right, Islam & Islamification, Marxism & Culture War, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, White Nationalism, World Affairs
It is four years ago today that I sat down to write a brief post under the heading Seven Seven, and followed it up a few days later with a longer account of my own tangential and highly tenuous contact with history.
A lot of water has flowed under the bridge since that day. If we are to believe our rulers, there have been scores and perhaps even hundreds of Islamic terrorist attacks that our (it is said) brave and professional security services have disrupted. Suspiciously few of these, however, have resulted in a prosecution.
In fact, suspicion seems to be the lasting product of 7/7. On the day that the memorial to that event was consecrated, more or less, the Daily Mail, having picked up yesterday’s snippet in the Guardian, was shouting from the rooftops that:
There is vanishingly little information given to back up the claim. A Hitler-idolising fruitcake named Martyn Gilleard, who was jailed last year, is the best they can come up with. Does that wash with the British public? Take a look at the recommendation figures on the comments to the Mail article.
For their part, Nationalists are deeply vexed. Nationalist bloggers have been quick to pour scorn on the story, and point out that it bears the imprint of the ubiquitous Gerry Gable of Searchlight, the Community Safety Trust, which is where the British Board of Deputies meets Mossad, and the Muslim Safety Forum, which is the interface for “British” Muslims with the police. But the worrying possibility exists that it signals the start of an aggressive police campaign against Nationalists. We shall see.
There is a moment, difficult to spot to be sure, when imperilment slips by some tenth or hundredth of a degree into something else ... something darker and doom-laden ... something from which escape is no longer possible. The elite effort if not to murder the children of Europe directly, then certainly to void the ties upon which their survival depends, has not yet reached that pivotal moment. Not in my opinion anyway. If it had, our little community would likely not be labouring over the creation of this rallying point. We would, I hope, have found other ways to fight, ways more fitting to the hour.
With this in mind - this consciousness of the special meaning of time - it is appropriate to remember that the fight has been fought at every stage. Liberalism, decadence, democracy, equality, capitalism, internationalism, Jewish self-advocacy in all its manifold guises ... these things have been critiqued by intellectuals throughout the 20th Century, and protested by activists since the flood began with the Windrush in June 1948.
Those who have fought before us were as strong in their persuasion as any Linderite, and no less pleased to shock. But such are the antecedents of our protest. There’s no point denying it.
Many of those brave, difficult people have paid a high price. Some have lost life itself, some their liberty, many their livelihoods. Some have lost their way or became disillusioned by the company they kept. Some have fought on faithfully, for, in truth, they can make no other accomodation with the world.
Today, on a thread at Laban’s ostensibly devoted to the trial of the man accused of the murder of Charlene Downes, one of these honourable men provided a potted history of his activism. I thought it was interesting and educational, so I am reproducing it here.
His thread-name is Veritas.
I think that this is a wonderful idea, and that the principle implicit in it should be extended further. Socialists should only teach the underclass, gay activists should only teach practising queens and black activists should only teach blacks. Multiculturalists should only teach genetically engineered race-less test-tube babies.
How western intelligence agencies played a crucial role in founding and funding the German neo-nazi movement
One of the most fascinating political narratives to gain currency of late has related to the tendency of governments to set up and finance “terrorist” or “extremist” strawmen with the intention of triumphantly “knocking down” and defeating their manufactured enemy, thereby justifying the alleged “necessity” of the Mother Government to “protect us”. This process can be motivated by the imperative of sewing fear, division, and even violence in society as a pretext to cracking down on our liberties, turning us against our fellow citizens, increasing state control, and diverting people from the more urgent task of checking the power of their own rapacious government.
Some alleged examples of this model in application include Nero’s Great Fire of Rome, Israel’s role in setting up Hamas, the Pentagon’s aborted “Operation Northwoods” scheme to stage “Cuban communist” attacks against Americans, and the Reichstag Fire, among other infamous events.
The tendency for humans to think in binary terms (either “left” or “right”, either “up” or “down”, either “good or “evil”, either “black” or “white”) is thus easily manipulated by the Hegelian synthesisers of the Total State. The very nature of argument is such that only two sides are normally allowed to participate, and it is often the case that arguments will tend to conclude in some form of “compromise” between the two sides. Therefore, if both the “thesis” and the “antithesis” can be controlled from the outset, it necessarily follows that the “synthesis” is essentially predetermined within the controlled paradigm.
Molotov cocktails were thrown at the home of a Sudanese refugee widow and her seven children in Toowoomba early yesterday morning, heightening racial tensions in the city. Khamisa Abui and her children, aged 3 to 16, were sleeping at their rented house in Dalmeny St when they heard thumping on the front door. A neighbour across the road saw the flames just after midnight. “The flames were a metre high on the steps and the front porch and the door mat was alight at the front door,” he said.
The neighbour, who declined to be named, phoned the fire brigade and ran across the road and banged on the door to wake the family because he knew the children would be asleep. “I pulled the burning mat away from the door and looked for a hose but I couldn’t find one in the dark,” he said. “You could smell the petrol fumes, and there were soft drink bottles lying on the steps.”
Once roused, Mrs Abui brought water and the two put out the remains of the crude fire bombs before the fire brigade arrived. The neighbour said the arson attack on a family who had come from a war zone was malicious racism. “There were two adults and seven kids in there – it could have been a disaster,” he said. “Those people are coming from war-torn lands. I just put it down to a brain-dead hillbilly mentality.”
Speaking through an interpreter, Mrs Abui said she and her children had been frightened by the attack and she was mystified as to why her family had been targeted. “I have no enemies with white people. I have no idea why they don’t like us here. I came here because Australia is a safe place to be,” she said. Mrs Abui was widowed when her husband was killed in Sudan, and she fled with her children to Egypt where she applied to come to Australia.
They would have a message with much wider appeal if they left the Nazi crap out
Liddle is a pretty reasonable bloke a lot of the time. I think all the abuse is just a leadup to saying that the NF are right about the Muslims
John Tyndall, Britain’s most prominent neo-Nazi for the best part of 40 years, was found dead in his home last week. If it is true that every man’s death diminishes us, then it is perhaps also true this particular death diminishes us slightly less than most. Frankly, speaking for myself, I feel fairly undiminished by it.
I use the term “neo-Nazi” with scrupulous care, not as an inaccurate, blanket term of abuse. Tyndall, you see, had a great deal of time for Adolf Hitler and not much time at all for the Jews. He had pictures of Hitler on his walls at home, just as you and I might have pictures of Angelina Jolie.
The founder of the British National Party John Tyndall has been found dead at his home, aged 71. The controversial former leader of the right-wing BNP was described as an “excellent chap with an analytical mind” by party colleagues. Mr Tyndall, once chairman of the National Front and who was facing race hate charges, was discovered at his home in Hove, East Sussex, by his wife.
The post below is crossposted from Dissecting Leftism
I seem to be doomed to challenging conventional ideas about the nature of the political spectrum—most notably in that I often point out that Hitler was a Leftist. I also however, have done a thorough empirical examination (via survey research) of the libertarian idea that the political spectrum is two dimensional—and found that the evidence is against that as well. I now think I have a third rebellion to undertake. I think that the term “Far Right” is a misnomer altogether. The Far Right certainly does not describe Hitler and the Fascists but I don’t think it even describes accurately the present-day racist groups who tend to attract that label. I think that the people so called are only another flavour of the Far Left. The so-called Far Right may say that they are against “Jews” whereas the Far Left say they are against “Zionists” but both are talking about essentially the same people. And even the “Anti-Zionist” mask of the Left tends to slip rather readily to reveal the real Jew-hatred underneath.
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa