Category: That Question Again

Holocaust denial

I notice that in some recent threads on this blog there has been something of a festival of holocaust denial and WW2 revisionism generally.  I am the last to claim that we normally get a fair and accurate picture of WW2.  My constant pointing out that Nazism was Leftist in its day (latest bit of evidence below) is sufficient warrant of that.

But holocaust denial really is straying into the badlands of irrationality (And I HAVE read David Irving on the question).  So I think I stand with something like 98% of the Western population in regarding holocaust deniers as fruitcakes.  That of itself does not make me right but it greatly affects the future readership of this blog.  This blog will be TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE in furthering majority rights if it comes to be seen as nothing more than an organ of the lunatic Right—which, I think, is about the present situation.  What bloggers and commenters here choose to do about that is up to them but I will do my bit by trying to post balanced accounts of past and present facts.

I hope that regular readers here have by now heard and seen enough from me about 1930s Nazi propaganda to be thoroughly persuaded of how Leftist it was.  But there is one last poster that I think really rams the point home so I reproduce it below.  The picture below is in fact a blow-up of an election banner that appeared in a larger photo that I presented on 12th. October.

It reads: “Mit Adolf Hitler “Ja”  fuer Gleichberechtigung und Frieden” —which translates as “With Adolf Hitler “Yes” for creating equal rights and peace”—the same old themes that the Left are still going on about to this day, of course.

Posted by jonjayray on Tuesday, November 8, 2005 at 08:39 AM in That Question Again
Comments (85) | Tell-a-Friend

The post Geoff didn’t get to write

Why do we beat ourselves up so much over the JQ?  Cui bono?

It seems to me that this must stop, and the nature and extent of the Jewish influence on our history and our way of life today must become a matter of intelligent but perfectly routine and unexceptional debate.  How else, anyway, can obsession be separated from legitimate concern, xenophobia from self-love?  How else, essentially, can we be sure that we really are as free as we think we are - and, if not, why not?

On Saturday a small step towards open and free discussion of the JQ was taken at VDare.  Peter Brimelow’s site is certainly not associated with the original sin of anti-semitism.  So I think one can read Kevin MacDonald’s latest authoritative article safe in the knowledge both that the JQ should on occasion be discussed among decent, thinking people and

is how to do it.

With thanks to Geoff for the link.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, November 7, 2005 at 04:43 PM in That Question Again
Comments (87) | Tell-a-Friend

A question from Steve Sailer

If Libby had spent the previous 15 years representing John Gotti, he couldn’t have attained such a high position in the government. What is it about working for Marc Rich that made Libby largely immune to criticism?

It is of course a rhetorical question. What made Libby immune from criticism is the fact that Rich is Jewish as is Libby himself. Note also the role played by America’s only “ally” in the Middle East in this episode (as indeed with USS Liberty, the Jonathan Pollard case and countless other instances).

Just below that, Sailer has another story about the wealth looted from Russia currently being lavished on luxuries on the banks of the Thames. Dog bites man story, I’d say.

Posted by Phil Peterson on Friday, October 28, 2005 at 05:46 PM in That Question Again
Comments (11) | Tell-a-Friend

But where is the conscience of the 1917 revolution and the gulag?

Simon Weisenthal has passed away in his sleep at home in Vienna.  He was 96.  Today’s obit pages will lead with his passing.  Everybody will have something important to say about justice and guilt and those damned Nazis.

Rabbi Marvin Hier, dean and founder of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Los Angeles, leads the pack.  He is quoted in the Telegraph saying, “I think he’ll be remembered as the conscience of the Holocaust.  When the Holocaust ended in 1945 and the whole world went home to forget, he alone remained behind to remember. He did not forget. He became the permanent representative of the victims, determined to bring the perpetrators of the history’s greatest crime to justice.”

Weisenthal himself said, “When history looks back I want people to know the Nazis weren’t able to kill millions of people and get away with it.

Speaking purely for myself, I want people to know that there is a certain inflation in what we “know”, hammered into public consciousness - and conscience - by the incessant repetition of statements such as Hier’s.

History’s greatest crime?  Debatable.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 at 04:24 AM in That Question Again
Comments (95) | Tell-a-Friend

War crime and an Israeli double-standard

Given that Serbian leaders are on trial for ‘crimes against humanity’, a precedent founded at the Nuremberg trials, I thought that this inimitable act of hypocrisy may be of interest.

Note that the Israeli government not only refuses to extradite Morel, but considers him to be the victim!

It’s something to remember the next time some 90-year old German or Eastern European man is stripped of US citizenship and extradited to his country of origin because of alleged WWII-era ‘war crimes.’

Also I wonder: how much of “our” mainstream media has covered the Morel case at all?  Will sanctions be placed against Israel for failing to extradite Morel?

Rhetorical questions, I know.

Posted by JW Holliday on Friday, July 8, 2005 at 05:51 PM in That Question Again
Comments (6) | Tell-a-Friend

Sam Francis on the Jewish Question

An old article by Sam Francis on Jewish political influence in the United States. I thought I’d mention it since Geoff and John have both broached the issue to some degree.

Continued...

Posted by Phil Peterson on Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 03:27 PM in That Question Again
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend

Robert Lindsay of California

Do visit Robert Lindsay’s blog

, read what he has to say.

Posted by leslie on Thursday, March 17, 2005 at 08:05 PM in That Question Again
Comments (74) | Tell-a-Friend

Sweden

I was going to write an entry on the Jewish Question. But I have decided not to write one entry but a series. The question has too many facets to be covered in a single effort. But even more so, the “Question” is intertwined with so many other political issues that studying it in isolation is a mistake, I believe.

Continued...

Posted by Phil Peterson on Wednesday, February 23, 2005 at 07:40 PM in That Question Again
Comments (73) | Tell-a-Friend