Category: That Question Again

How does he get away with it?

Professor Ted Cantle CBE ...

... has a lofty vision for England.  He believes that la-la land can and must be built here, for all our benefit.  And, no doubt, for his.

The key is to just open

English eyes to the amazing humanity and really, really amazing social and cultural contributions of our exciting new black and brown brothers.  And our new Albanian brothers.  And our new Russian Mafia brothers.  And let’s not forget our new Turkish and Kurdish brothers, and so many, many more.  Brothers - and brutthas - in humanity every one.

Clever Ted - who used to run Nottingham city council - picked up early on the fashion among desperately disappointed government ministers for alternatives to Multiculturalism.  He came up with Interculturalism - not new but, hey, nor is hope.  And G-d knows, hope is all desperately disappointed government ministers have got.  Hope and taxpayers’ money, of course.

Ted’s Interculturalism is a Freudianised cash cow that “defeats” raysissum and breaks down “preconceived” barriers by getting us all to lie back on his black imitation leather couch and blah blah blah in the prescribed manner.  It’s the same old Marxian crap about everything being socially-constructed, ie perfectible.

Perfectible makes good money.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, May 7, 2007 at 06:17 PM in That Question Again
Comments (39) | Tell-a-Friend

Holocaust website draws thousands of Iranians.  Or maybe not.

The Middle East Times ran a nice piece of disinformation on 16th April about the thousands of Iranians who ...

visit a new Holocaust Web site in Farsi run by Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial, despite their leadership’s questioning the Nazi genocide of Jews, the museum said.”

... The Web site was put online by Yad Vashem in Jerusalem in January, and has so far had some 25,100 visits, including 12,170 from inside Iran, spokeswoman Estee Yaari said.

It includes 20 historical chapters on World War II, the Nazi regime, the systematic killings, and photos from the Nazi death camps and ghettos.

“We believe that making credible, comprehensive information about the Holocaust available to Persian speakers can contribute to the fight against Holocaust denial,” said Yad Vashem chairman Avner Shalev.

Iran’s firebrand president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has branded the systematic killing of 6 million of Europe’s Jews as a “myth,” and last year Tehran hosted a controversial revisionist Holocaust conference, sparking an international outcry.

Shalev calls the Web site a powerful tool against Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric, which has included calls for the Jewish state to be “wiped off the map.”

So let’s look at this “powerful tool”.  It isn’t clear, actually, whether the “25,100 visits” are unique visitors or just hits.  I presume that Yad Vashem isn’t too fussy about the difference and these are just hits - in which case the site is doing in three months about half what MR, also a specialised facility, pulls in a single day.

Now, the visitor figure for “Iranians” is less than half of the total.  But ... there are up to 40,000 Persian Jews in Iran who might be expected to have a greater than average interest in the site.

So how many Ahmadinejad-apostates is Yad Vashem really celebrating?  Based on our profile of visitors I would guess the site receives about 80 unique visitors per day from within Iran.  Of those half could easily be Jews, and of the remainder the preponderant majority are there in the expectation of sampling a Jewish deception.

The article quotes two visitor messages of support but doesn’t, of course, specify whether the authors were ethnic Iranians or Jews.  However, let us give them the benefit of the doubt.  They have had at least two successes for their trouble.

The population of Iran is 71 million.  But what the heck, there’s always a bit of good publicity to be got out of it.

Oh yes, and one more thing.  Ahmadinejad never said Israel should be wiped off the map.  His words were, “Our dear Imam said that the occupying regime must be wiped off the map and this was a very wise statement.”

Yad Vashem, being a temple of historical fidelity, really should be able to get that right.  If it’s interest was in doing so.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, April 23, 2007 at 07:25 PM in That Question Again
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

Some are more equal than others

The Road to Anti-Semitism is Paved with Dubious Intentions
http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/11153.htm#loginPostForm

Jewish Israel-haters routinely condemn the idea that Jews are a separate people and deserve their own state. But they also demand that the movement disassociate from openly anti-Semitic groups like “Deir Yassin Remembered,” avoid cross-posting articles by Holocaust deniers on their web sites, and refrain from talking about world Jewish conspiracies. Why? Because, they say, these things would aid the Zionists. Nice.

Non-Arab Semites “are a separate people and deserve their own state.”  What an interesting concept!  But, there must be more to it than that, because even the argument that (European population here) are a separate people and deserve their own state is something non-Arab Semites have been in the vanguard of opposing for at least a century.  In fact, even the argument that (European population here) are a separate people is something non-Arab Semites have opposed, as a group, for at least a century.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Saturday, April 14, 2007 at 04:57 PM in That Question Again
Comments (11) | Tell-a-Friend

Zundel sentenced to five years

The prosecution asked for and has been rewarded with a five year sentence for Ernst Zundel, at the end of his trial in Mannheim on 14 counts of incitement.

Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel was sentenced to five years in prison by a German court Thursday.

It’s the maximum sentence the far-right activist could have received for his conviction on 14 counts of incitement. Denying the Holocaust is a crime in Germany.

The decision was cheered by Jewish groups including the Canadian Jewish Congress.

“I think that they’ve given a strong message ... to the world, that I believe will bring a tremendous amount of comfort to Holocaust survivors,” said Bernie Farber, chief executive officer of the CJC.

“I think a lot of us can take a very deep breath and move on to other things—other than thinking of Ernst Zundel anymore.”

... Prosecutor Andreas Grossmann suggested Zundel was a “political con man.”

“You might as well argue that the sun rises in the west,” Grossmann said. “But you cannot change that the Holocaust has been proven.”

One hoped with the early release of David Irving from his cell in Austria that the nadir has been reached.  Apparently not.  It is very sad.  I admire these brave men such as Zundel, Germar Rudolf, Robert Faurisson.  I do not know whether they are right in all they claim.  I do know that state oppression is a crude wheel on which to break these beautiful, difficult birds, and is to be rejected and resisted by all who call themselves decent and fair-minded men.

The global machinery of the Holocaust will probably not turn for long without some Don Quixote somewhere determining to drive a lance through the mill-race.  It will happen, eventually.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, February 15, 2007 at 07:09 PM in That Question Again
Comments (14) | Tell-a-Friend

OPEN SEASON ON EVERY RELIGION BUT ONE

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2007/01/19/open_season_on_every_religion_but_one

In a nation of broken taboos—where a Brooklyn artist can display a crucifix in urine and Madonna can rock out while hanging from a cross—only one religion, Judaism, enjoys virtual immunity from criticism. Those who dare break the silence are punished with social and political ruin, tarred as “anti-Semites,” sinners of the worst stripe.

Think I exaggerate? Just take a moment to sample the scorching critiques leveled by national public figures against Islam and especially Christianity. For starters, listen to Anti-Defamation League head Abe Foxman. If you think Jews aren’t uniquely sheltered, imagine if he were talking about them.

“They are a well-funded, well-organized facet,” he intoned, “engaged in an aggressive campaign to transform America into a theocracy ruled by their warped view of biblical law.”

Foxman was talking about Christians or, in his words, “Christian Supremacists.” This was a warm-up for his lecture on Muslim extremists, another group of scary, religious radicals Foxman said also seek global dominion. The ADL head bragged that in 2006 more than 21 books or national articles were written about the threat of politically active Christians. First on his list was Michelle Goldberg’s Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism, which accuses Christians of “dominion theology.”

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Monday, January 22, 2007 at 07:45 PM in Christianity,  That Question Again
Comments (10) | Tell-a-Friend

Semitic anti-Semitism

Israel and Apartheid: In Defense of Jimmy Carter
http://tonykaron.com/2006/12/22/israel-and-apartheid-in-defense-of-jimmy-carter/

Nothing makes liberal American supporters of Israel more uncomfortable than the comparison between the circumstances it has imposed on the Palestinians and those that the apartheid regime imposed on black South Africans. That’s precisely why it is so important and commendable that Jimmy Carter has tempted the wrath of the Israel lobby and many Jewish-American liberals-in-denial by making that comparison — as he says, it’s time Americans took a look at Palestinian life and history, and as any good person of faith or basic humanity would, treat it as of equal value. The point being that Jimmy Carter had to write this book precisely because Palestinian life and history is not accorded equal value in American discourse, far from it. And his use of the word apartheid is not only morally valid; it is essential, because it shakes the moral stupor that allows many liberals to rationalize away the daily, grinding horror being inflicted Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.

Or preferably, to avoid discussing it altogether. As Carter notes:

  For the past 30 years, I have witnessed and experienced the severe restraints on any free and balanced discussion of the facts. This reluctance to criticize policies of the Israeli government is due to the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the American-Israel Political Action Committee and the absence of any significant contrary voices. It would be almost politically suicidal for members of Congress to espouse a balanced position between Israel and Palestine, to suggest that Israel comply with international law or to speak in defence of justice or human rights for Palestinians… What is even more difficult to comprehend is why the editorial pages of the major newspapers and magazines in the US exercise similar self-restraint, quite contrary to private assessments expressed forcefully by their correspondents in the Holy Land.

Indeed, you only had to look at the coverage of Carter’s book in much of the mainstream media, which focused less on the arguments he presented, than on the — entirely predictable — furor they caused.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, December 27, 2006 at 03:56 PM in Jewish Diaspora,  That Question Again
Comments (17) | Tell-a-Friend

Serge Dassault

A SFer did a bit of semi-original research so I figured the least I could do is reproduce it here:

This little research of mine shows how some zionists are so well hidden, you would never guess they are what they are. It also casts a light onto who is behind the islamification of Europe. I am pretty sure if one were to do research into other hidden and overt zionists, one will uncover a lot of ugly truth behind a lot of what is going wrong in the White world:

Serge Dassault (born 4 April 1925) is a French entrepreneur. According to Forbes magazine, as of 2006 he was one of the 56th richest person in the world .
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Serge_Dassault&oldid=91536329

In 2004, Serge Dassault helped finance the 200 million euro Islamic cultural center (essentially, a mosque) in his city of Corbeil-Essonnes out of his funds.

He was born Jewish as Serge Bloch, but in 1946 his family “converted” to catolicism and changed their name to Dassault.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serge_Dassault#Famille

His buisiness empire owns 82% of Socpresse, which controls many important French newspapers and magazines, including Le Figaro, and L’Express.
Basically, tools of brainwashing to Euro populace.

He also owns large stakes in various industries that allows him to influence politics in France:
# Dassault Systèmes (45,1 %)
# Lagardère Active (20,0 %)
# Dassault Développement
# Dassault Communication
# Sogitec
# Dassault Falcon Jet
# Dassault Falcon Service
# Dassault Multimedia
# Dassault Investissements
# SABCA
# Socpresse
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupe_Dassault

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, December 22, 2006 at 06:42 PM in Islam & Islamification,  Media,  That Question Again
Tell-a-Friend

Stalin’s Jews

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html
Stalin’s Jews

And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD. Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system

.

In his Book “Stalin: Court of the Red Star”, Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.

Stalin’s close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the “first Stalinist” and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao’s terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.

Lazar was a Jew.

Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We’ll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD’s special department and the organization’s chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.

In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin.

The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and “Soviet people.” Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and “play dumb”: What do we have to do with them? But let’s not forget them. My own view is different. I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things.

Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of “our hangmen,” who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, December 22, 2006 at 06:12 PM in That Question Again
Comments (32) | Tell-a-Friend

The Mendacity of the Realist

Realist at Inverted World now has a piece about David Duke.  I was disappointed to see this, because per Realist’s comments in his first column I was led to believe he’d be outlining his censorship policies and hoping to get to poke fun at them.  I’ll have to settle for a less interesting subject to poke fun at.

On a personal level I like Realist, he seems a good sort.  That said, he seems to be out to lunch when it comes to logically supporting a position.  The piece is basically a string of fallacies designed to discredit David Duke, and by extension, White Nationalism.

First he reminds the reader of why he created IV - because Amren wasn’t quite philo-Semitic enough for his tastes.  Sure, Amren heavily censors the topic in moderating comments, but the occasional tepid criticism of non-Arab Semites was allowed through to sully the constant philo-Semitism and finally it became too much to bear.  To make matters worse, Jared Taylor didn’t excommunicate Duke for his heresy at the last Amren conference.

Then Realist states his thesis:

Here I will spell out clearly why I think the racial right in America is fundamentally insane.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 at 04:19 PM in Race realism,  That Question Again,  White Nationalism
Comments (95) | Tell-a-Friend

A letter to Lawrence

The following is a reply by me to Lawrence Auster, part of the on-going debate of Svi’s Inverted World post.

Lawrence,

You are painting yourself into a corner, and it is not one from which a principled argument for the survival of Western Civilisation can be prosecuted.

Let’s clear our lines.  You and I would not talk of saving Western Civ if its outlook was not dark and getting darker.  On this, then, we can agree.  The illness has many symptoms.  We don’t need to go into all of these now.  Some are of a nature that all genuine Conservatives - and you and I are both Conservatives - will immediately identify.  Some are of a nature that Conservatives might, given the current climate, be loathe to do so.  But I will come to the imposition of silence last of all.

You and I can also agree that Western Civilisation is the production of Western Man - to be precise, of European Caucasian Man.  You and I can agree that a demographic disaster for him, meaning the loss of homeland by race-replacement and deracination, is a civilisational disaster for the West.  Again, because we are both Conservatives we can agree that in a general sense the decay of liberalism, which sad condition includes such confections as Reaganite right-liberalism and neoconservatism, describes the possible political, sociological and demographic outcomes of our age.  Needless to say, these cannot be Conservative outcomes.

Perhaps, then, we can also agree that the West’s political, cultural and corporate elites are liberalism’s executive officers, and their collective, day-to-day actions steer the West down its course to disaster.

I am confident that you and I can also agree that Jewish-authored liberal philosophies, Jewish political activism, Jewish largesse are highly germaine to that course.  (I know you have written critically, and rather refreshingly, of these things.)

That order of play - liberalism <> the liberal elite <> the Jewish engagement - is fair, I think, and should tell you that “you people”, as you name us, possess a proper understanding of the West’s political and cultural woes.  The next time you leap to your conclusion and feel the irresistible impulse to shout about how obsessed with Jewry we are, please entertain the smallest of doubts somewhere in your skull that you may, in fact, be wrong.  You are wrong now.

Very well, let’s continue.  You famously profess your desire to preserve our civilisation.  But such preservation has certain unavoidable and, for you, uncomfortable implications.  Genetically diverse peoples occupying a single living space do not merely compete as free individuals.  They compete as groups, each informed by specific group interests.  You acknowledge as much in objecting to mass imigration.  Therefore you know that competition for resources, for land and, most of all, for power is an expression of those interests.  Life is Manichean, that’s the truth.  And I should stress that it is so for evolutionary reasons.  Group interests are natural ethnic interests.  They are not culturally-imbued, as Frank Salter has shown.  They come with the skin we are in.

Notwithstanding all the familiar hogwash fed daily to European Caucasians to negate our instincts and make us blind to one another we, too, are possessed of natural ethnic interests.  And so are Jews, and those unidirectional Jewish-authored liberal philosophies, Jewish political activism and Jewish largesse that I mentioned are transparent expressions of that.  One can see straight away from their divergent purpose that there is an unfathomably deep conflict with EC interests here.  It is a conflict that Jewry has been winning hands down since the end of WW2, and that is not without the most profound consequences for the fate of the European world.

Now we arrive at the first of two vital questions, Lawrence.  Can the creator peoples of Western Civ be pulled out of their liberal delusions sufficiently to save themselves and the Civ while their natural ethnic interests are denied them?  Your whole worldview argues a “Yes” to that question because you can’t quite bring yourself to resolve that conflict of interests in our favour.  That’s why I say you are painting yourself into a corner.  Because, of course, the correct answer is “No”.

And here’s the second seminal question: Can any Jew, a member of the most ethnocentric people on earth, ever deny his own ethnic interests and, for example, promote the European racial solidarity perquisite to saving the West?  I will believe it when I see it, and right now I am looking at you, Lawrence - at your many logical inconsistencies.

Now, I would very much like you to prove me wrong on that.  You can begin by putting aside the aggressive naming of us.  This is what the Jewish enemies of ECs always do when we show signs of reconnecting with our ethnic interests.  They silence us with a cold douche of vile words.  It’s very ugly.  And it’s not remotely in your interests, old man, if you are telling the world the truth on your website every day.

Regards,

GW

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, December 15, 2006 at 10:42 AM in That Question Again
Tell-a-Friend

The Inverted World

A post at Stormfront by Realist from Inverted World has piqued my interest:

I am the Realist, who set up this website. Unlike American Renaissance, I would publish an article critical of Jewish influence on white societies provided it was intellectually defensible. “Intellectually defensible” means that the article would not contain unfounded slanders against Jews. Furthermore, any article that I published would have to concede that much of the commentary about Jews in the white nationalist community, including the whole of Holocaust denial, is sick and evil.

Lawrence Auster’s article “Why Jews Welcome Muslims” is an example of the sort of thing I would be glad to publish. Another is this entry on Auster’s blog View from the Right.

Auster has spelled out the differences between responsible and irresponsible criticism of Jews here.

Putting aside the not-so-rigorous question of why Auster (an ethnic non-Arabic Semite) has produced all Realist’s examples of acceptable criticism of non-Arabic Semites, I wondered why all such criticism must contain the disclaimer about sick and evil WNism, and invited Realist to stop by MR and comment.  I’m genuinely interested in hearing what he has to say.

He cites Auster as having spelled out the differences between responsible and irresponsible criticism of Jews, so let’s take a look at Auster’s piece (again).

Update: Auster responded (see below).

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 at 07:44 PM in Race realism,  That Question Again,  White Nationalism
Comments (141) | Tell-a-Friend

Man Bites Dog

http://www.fsumonitor.com/stories/120106BM.shtml

JEWISH ACTIVIST SENTENCED IN RUSSIA. Boris Stomakhin, an ethnically Jewish activist whose writings openly supported Chechen rebels, was sentenced to five years in prison last week after being found guilty of inciting ethnic hatred and calling for extremist actions. Earlier this month, UCSJ (Union of Councils for Jews in the Former Soviet Union) sent a letter to Moscow’s Butyrsky Court expressing concerns about Stomakhin’s health and the fairness of the charges.

Stomakhin was accused of publishing four articles in his monthly newspaper “Radikalnaya Politika” (Radical Policy) about the Chechen war. The court ruled that “Stomakhin approved of the terrorists’ actions, which were aimed at destroying the Russian people as a race,” Interfax reported. In a flagrant abuse of anti-hate speech laws, the prosecution charged him under Article 282—“Inciting ethnic hatred.” Earlier this year, the leader of the Russian-Chechen Friendship Society, Stanislav Dmitrievsky, was charged with a similar offense in an obvious effort to silence critics of the war.

[my emphasis]

Assuming this is accurate (no small thing), it marks the first time I’ve ever heard of Europeans using the hate charge against non-Arab Semites.  I’ve no illusions as to whether this is mostly white or nationalist, but the fact of the total inversion remains.

Human rights activists and lawyers said the sentence is unprecedented in its severity. “Putting people in prison for words is unfathomable. Some get less prison time for murder,” said Boris Timoshenko of the Glasnost Protection Foundation. The U.S.-based Committee to Protect Journalists condemned the court’s ruling and expressed hope that it would be overturned.

“This sentence exposes the underlying hypocrisy of the Russian government’s half-hearted struggle against extremist groups and hate speech,” said Micah H. Naftalin, UCSJ’s national director. “This month alone, the FSB refused to investigate the distribution of a neo-Nazi hit list containing the names and addresses of human rights activists whom the authors ‘sentenced to death,’ the publisher of a newspaper in Ulyanovsk who publicly called for the murder of Jews got a suspended sentence, and three youths who broke the jaw and fractured the skull of the Minister of Culture of the Kabardino-Balkaria Republic while screaming racist slogans were sentenced to just six months to a year in prison.”

[my emphasis]

Let’s all cry into our pillows for the non-Arab Semite lynched with kosher rope; try not to laugh at the irony of Fenyvesi’s response, which on any given day would normally live in the mouths of WNs.

P.S: If you start believing it’s all bad news, try reading the Bigotry Monitor:

http://www.fsumonitor.com

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Sunday, December 3, 2006 at 02:47 PM in That Question Again,  White Nationalism
Comments (8) | Tell-a-Friend

Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz in the Telegraph.  And the Jewish Telegraph.

Here are the hotspots of a rather interesting, suitably fawning Telegraph article about the demographic crisis of Diasporic Jewry.

Is this the last generation of British Jews?

It is 350 years since Oliver Cromwell readmitted Jews to Britain, but a leading Israeli rabbi warns that Judaism here is now in imminent danger of extinction.

Leading figures from Britain’s Jewish community will join the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh this week at a glitzy ceremony at St James’s Palace to mark the 350th anniversary of Cromwell’s decision to allow Jews to return to these shores.

It is hard today to envisage British society without Jews. It is more than 100 years since Benjamin Disraeli became prime minister and there are Jews prominent in every profession and in every corner of British culture: from Lucian Freud, the artist, to Sacha Baron Cohen, the comedian; Harold Pinter, the playwright, to Harry Woolf, the Lord Chief Justice.

As the Government has conceded that it is time to reconsider the success of the multicultural experiment, Jews in Britain have provided the perfect example of an immigrant people able to retain their identity while playing a full part in society.  However, their very success in assimilating into British life now appears to be threatening their survival in this country.

Earlier this month, Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz, the world’s leading Talmudic scholar, on a visit to Manchester from his home in Jerusalem, delivered an apocalyptic vision of Anglo-Jewry, warning that a once thriving community faces extinction.

“The Jewish community in England, as in other parts of Europe, is demographically unviable,” he said. “It is a dying community, without even counting assimilation. They say that in order to remain stable, a community needs to average 2.2 children. I don’t think this is the case in Anglo-Jewry. Whatever the figure, when you add the devastating devaluation of assimilation and intermarriage, it is becoming smaller all the time.”

And here’s the Rabbi’s Manchester speech reported - minus the salad dressing - in the Jewish Telegraph.  At the close are some brief but interesting observations on the native majority:-

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, November 26, 2006 at 02:55 PM in That Question Again
Comments (5) | Tell-a-Friend

Dr. Kevin MacDonald critiques the inquisition

Heidi Does Long Beach: The SPLC vs. Academic Freedom

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, November 15, 2006 at 07:34 PM in Free Speech,  That Question Again
Comments (9) | Tell-a-Friend

Ran HaCohen

Just wanted to point readers to Ran HaCohen, he’s the rare Jew who pulls few punches against his fellow Jews.  Here’s his latest body-blow

Oh, and a hat tip to Steve Sailer, living proof that the more you broaden the definition of “anti-Semitism,” the more “anti-Semitism” becomes the duty of all good men.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Monday, November 6, 2006 at 05:57 PM in That Question Again
Tell-a-Friend

Book review of “Breeding between the Lines” by Alon Ziv

This is a book review of “Breeding between the lines: Why interracial people are healthier and more attractive,” by Alon Ziv, 184 pp., Barricade Books, 2006, ISBN: 1569803064. My preliminary impression that the book most likely doesn’t have decent data in it is confirmed.

Continued...

Posted by J Richards on Saturday, October 14, 2006 at 12:06 AM in Anthropology,  Books,  Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests,  Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity,  IQ and Heredity,  Psychology,  Race realism,  That Question Again
Comments (288) | Tell-a-Friend

Video of “Israel Lobby” debate in New York, 28th September

The London Review of Books held a greatly over-subscribed debate at the end of last month on the Walt & Mearsheimer paper.  Its title was “Israel Lobby: Too much influence on US foreign policy?”  It took place in the Great Hall of the Cooper Union. The panellists were Shlomo Ben-Ami, Martin Indyk, Tony Judt, Rashid Khalidi, John Mearsheimer and Dennis Ross, and the moderator was Anne-Marie Slaughter.

Click here to see the video.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, October 12, 2006 at 06:50 AM in That Question Again
Comments (8) | Tell-a-Friend

Israeli Diplomat Accused Of Luring Minor For Sex

http://wsbradio.com/news/083106diplomatsexcharges.html

The indictment alleges Ofri used e-mail and online messages “to seduce, solicit, lure, or entice a child for illegal acts relating to sodomy, aggravated sodomy, child molestation and aggravated child molestation utilizing verbal descriptions, narrative accounts and photographic depictions.”

I ran a Google News search for Yosef Ofri and here’s what I got:

Why is this national news in France (via the NYT’s international organ, btw) and Israel, but local news in the U.S., only in Georgia?

We know the NYT is “more anti-Israel than Al-Jazeera,” so there must be a logical explanation.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, September 1, 2006 at 05:15 PM in That Question Again
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

Oh for G-d’s sake: insane miscegenation propaganda

Interesting new book out this week

Breeding Between the Lines: Why Interracial People are Healthier and More Attractive

by Alon Ziv

Book Description This book combines sex, race, health and genetics in a daring new theory. Written with accessible, direct prose, anecdotes, analogies, and examples from human and animal studies, it is sure to spark debate in a massive way.

Jay Phelan, Author of Mean Genes: Breeding Between the Lines is that rare book that is insightful and revolutionary, while remaining compulsively readable and downright fun.

Alon Ziv, Alon Ziv, why is that name pinging my Jewdar?

A member of the group least likely to miscegenate (with the world’s highest mean IQ as a direct result) persuades the rest of us to miscegenate in an insightful, revolutionary, readable and downright fun book.

Yay, more jewish psyops.

Addendum by J Richards

Svy, I simply have to add a few things to this entry, and I don’t think you would mind.

Here is the cover of the book by Alon Ziv.

Is the mixed race woman a match for white beauty?

Alon Ziv has to be insane if he believes that the broad-nosed and masculine mixed-race woman looks better.  Can people in their right mind believe that attractive white women can be improved upon if non-whites are absorbed into the white gene pool?

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Tuesday, August 22, 2006 at 09:06 PM in Anthropology,  Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests,  Genetics & Human Bio-Diversity,  Psychology,  Race realism,  That Question Again
Comments (523) | Tell-a-Friend

Irreconcilable Differences

Irreconcilable Differences

I’ve tried twice now to post this comment to the article linked above but something in it is beyond the Pale to Mr. Jobling.  I don’t like wasting my time so I’ll post it here instead.

Now when I attempt to post just a link to this post at Amren, I get the following message:

Your comment has been blocked. This has happened for one of three reasons:
1. We allow active commenting on news stories for two weeks, after which no new comments will be accepted.
2. You may have tried to post comments in rapid succession (two in less than 20 seconds).
3. Or you may have entered an invalid email address. You are allowed to leave the email box blank, but if you do put anything into it, it has to be a valid email address.
4. Or you may have tried to post on a story that is closed to comments. Check the end of the article to see if there is a note about this.

If you click on your browser’s back button, your comment should still be in the comment box. Please wait at least 20 seconds before trying to post again.

Apparently the fifth point is written in invisible ink:

5. Or you may have been IP blocked from commenting.

Commentary orginally intented for the Amren thread follows.

Continued...

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, August 18, 2006 at 04:05 PM in That Question Again,  White Nationalism
Comments (38) | Tell-a-Friend

The Jewish Quarterly on porn

While I was doing some quick research for a recent comment on another thread I came across this article by Nathan Abrams from the Winter 2004 issue of The Jewish Quarterly.  Many MR readers may know this anonymous piece at Heretical.com.  It’s something of a staple for the right on the vexing issue of Jews and pornography.  But unforced confession is so much more convincing than allegation, and TJQ’s piece - which I, for one, had not seen before - is not short of it.  For example:-

Is there a deeper reason, beyond the mere financial, as to why Jews in particular have become involved in porn? There is surely an element of rebellion in Jewish X-rated involvement. Its very taboo and forbidden nature serves to make it attractive. As I written in these pages before, treyf signifies ‘the whole world of forbidden sexuality, the sexuality of the goyim, and there all the delights are imagined to lie ...’ (‘Reel Kashrut: Jewish food in film’, JQ 189 [Spring 2003]).

According to one anonymous industry insider quoted by E. Michael Jones in the magazine Culture Wars (May 2003), ‘the leading male performers through the 1980s came from secular Jewish upbringings and the females from Roman Catholic day schools’. The standard porn scenario became as a result a Jewish fantasy of schtupping the Catholic shiksa.

Furthermore, as Orthodox Jew and porn gossipmonger Luke Ford explains on his website (lukeford.net): ‘Porn is just one expression of [the] rebellion against standards, against the disciplined life of obedience to Torah that marks a Jew living Judaism.’ It is also a revolt against (often middle-class) parents who wish their children to be lawyers, doctors and accountants. As performer Bobby Astyr put it on the same website, ‘It’s an “up yours” to the uncles with the pinky rings who got down on me as a kid for wanting to be musician.’

... Extending the subversive thesis, Jewish involvement in the X-rated industry can be seen as a proverbial two fingers to the entire WASP establishment in America. Some porn stars viewed themselves as frontline fighters in the spiritual battle between Christian America and secular humanism. According to Ford, Jewish X-rated actors often brag about their ‘joy in being anarchic, sexual gadflies to the puritanical beast’. Jewish involvement in porn, by this argument, is the result of an atavistic hatred of Christian authority: they are trying to weaken the dominant culture in America by moral subversion. Astyr remembers having ‘to run or fight for it in grammar school because I was a Jew. It could very well be that part of my porn career is an “up yours” to these people’. Al Goldstein, the publisher of Screw, said (on lukeford.net), ‘The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks. Catholicism sucks. We don’t believe in authoritarianism.’ Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture and, as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream (and is no doubt consumed by those very same WASPs), its subversive character becomes more charged. Porn is no longer of the ‘what the Butler saw’ voyeuristic type; instead, it is driven to new extremes of portrayal that stretch the boundaries of the porn aesthetic. As new sexual positions are portrayed, the desire to shock (as well as entertain) seems clear.

It is a case of the traditional revolutionary/radical drive of immigrant Jews in America being channelled into sexual rather than leftist politics. Just as Jews have been disproportionately represented in radical movements over the years, so they are also disproportionately represented in the porn industry. Jews in America have been sexual revolutionaries. A large amount of the material on sexual liberation was written by Jews. Those at the forefront of the movement which forced America to adopt a more liberal view of sex were Jewish. Jews were also at the vanguard of the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse and Paul Goodman replaced Marx, Trotsky and Lenin as required revolutionary reading. Reich’s central preoccupations were work, love and sex, while Marcuse prophesied that a socialist utopia would free individuals to achieve sexual satisfaction. Goodman wrote of the ‘beautiful cultural consequences’ that would follow from legalizing pornography: it would ‘ennoble all our art’ and ‘humanize sexuality’.

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, August 13, 2006 at 06:29 PM in That Question Again
Comments (14) | Tell-a-Friend

An honest defence of Israel

Peter Hitchens on Israel as a natural ally of the West and of Western civilization.

Posted by Alex Zeka on Wednesday, August 2, 2006 at 08:33 AM in That Question Again,  World Affairs
Comments (95) | Tell-a-Friend

British anger at Jewish terror celebration

British anger at terror celebration

AS ISRAEL wages war against Hezbollah “terrorists” in Lebanon, Britain has protested about the celebration by right-wing Israelis of a Jewish “act of terrorism” against British rule 60 years ago this week.

The rightwingers, including Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Prime Minister, are commemorating the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, the headquarters of British rule, that killed 92 people and helped to drive the British from Palestine.

They have erected a plaque outside the restored building, and are holding a two-day seminar with speeches and a tour of the hotel by one of the Jewish resistance fighters involved in the attack.

Simon McDonald, the British Ambassador in Tel Aviv, and John Jenkins, the Consul-General in Jerusalem, have written to the municipality, stating: “We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated.”

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 06:59 PM in That Question Again
Comments (7) | Tell-a-Friend

Jewish-only policy on Israeli flights?

Jewish-only policy on Israeli flights?

A small airline reportedly allows only Jewish passengers on certain flights because of problems with baggage screening.

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Thursday, June 15, 2006 at 08:11 PM in Ethnicity and Ethnic Genetic Interests,  That Question Again
Comments (20) | Tell-a-Friend

Savage to Soros:‘It’s People Like You Who Brought About the Holocaust’

‘It’s People Like You Who Brought About the Holocaust’

“You’re the people—people like you give Jews a bad name, Soros. It’s people like you who brought about the Holocaust, Soros. I stand by those words,” Savage said.

“For all your doubts about the unbridled pursuit of self-interest, few people have benefited more from capitalism than you. He says: ‘I’m happy to acknowledge that. I have a platform because I made a lot of money. If I were just an intellectual, an obscure university professor, I would be saying these things and I wouldn’t be heard.’

Hey George, let me tell you something, I don’t have as much money as you. I have 50,000 times the influence that you do, you punk, lying, coward, Satanist, backstabbing freak. You’re the people—people like you give Jews a bad name, Soros. It’s people like you who brought about the Holocaust, Soros. I stand by those words. I stand by those words. I would debate you tomorrow, Soros, on any platform, anywhere. I’ll debate you anywhere. It’s people like you who brought about the Holocaust, Soros. That’s why I need you to shut your mouth and understand the damage you’re doing to this world and to the Jewish people, George Soros.”

Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Thursday, June 15, 2006 at 08:02 PM in That Question Again
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend