Category: Law & Order
Something’s very fishy when the mainstream’s exposing TNB in this manner.
by David Hamilton
Further to the recent posts about my ordeal with The Metropolitan Police Counter Terrorism Unit I have been interviewed by two different officers from the CTU about imaginary links they tried to say I had with a terrorist. In the UK, the Counter Terrorism Command (CTC) are trying to build up a narrative of how the “far-right” are terrorists just like those in the Muslim community. I became ensnared in this effort because a man I never met liked a letter I wrote and posted on Facebook. This was decided on at a meeting between a senior Metropolitan Police officer and a meeting of Muslims.(1)
There is a good reason I know nothing about Anders Breivik, the man who blew up a government building and shot 76 teenage Marxists in Norway. As part of its agenda to invent home-grown “right wing terrorism,” the CTC are trying to fit me up as being an associate of Breivik, whom I’ve never met.
So now the police, who did nothing about Moslem paedophilia for years, are gearing up to fight “the racism”.
Over this last week the MSM has reported on the trial at :Liverpool Crown Court of the first eleven of forty-seven Moslem Asians, mostly Pakistanis, charges with grooming white girls for prostituting among fellow Moslem men. The charges against the defendants do not mention racism, and none of the reporting has suggested that a racist motive might be inferred from the identity of the victims. On the contrary, the reporting has been both sparse and carefully calculated to be as “non-inflammatory” as possible.
It has not worked.
Of course, the story for the Guardian was always going to be “fears” for the Neo-Marxist Utopian Tomorrow. But the story is also reported at Yahoo:
… where the nature of the Liverpool trial is too painful for the politically fastidious to share with the Yahoo reader. Fortunately, the comment facility has been carelessly left operational and, so far, over 1150 Yahoo readers have explained exactly what Englishmen think of their vibrant new countrymen. The Guardianistas are right to worry. Moslem grooming of white girls is thought by nationalists to occur wherever there are large Moslem colonies. It can only go one way now.
The Truth About Reconstruction: our template for hatred and disunity
Ultra-social conservative crypto-something Laban Tall blogs on the riots in France:
You’ve got to love those quotes around youths. Laban is criticizing the beeb for leaving out the criminals’ ethnicity, while avoiding mentioning it himself. Well, I’ll say it: they are Muslims, which means Turks or Arabs in France (or just possibly Pakistanis). Members not just of more or less the same religion, but also of more or less the same genotype.
By David Hamilton
On 18 November 2008 a copy of a BNP members list was published on the internet, and thus began a train of events that is destined to be one of history’s turning points. It revealed to a trusting public what the authorities are really like. These decent people who are supposed to be looking after our interests now stand exposed as totalitarians who will do anything, however oppressive and tyrannical, to silence dissent.
Innocent members of the public will be surprised at how oppressed the British people are unless they remain quiescent and only do permitted activities like watch telly, support sports teams and go to bars. If they dare speak out or campaign against certain injustices they will be persecuted and even brutalised.
There are many in this country who sincerely believe in freedom and democracy. They frequently gravitate towards the easily-occupied “moral high ground” of condemning racism by whites. But they rarely comprehend that a totalitarian, undemocratic structure has been created to oppress whites. Do they ever stop to think that in the home of the Mother of Parliaments, the Rule of Law and representative democracy the police would torture a political prisoner?
There was even a thinly-veiled incitement to violence from the established media. On 20/11/2008 Mirror columnist Brian Reade wrote, under a picture of Nick Griffin, and in mock-worried tones:-
In part, at least, his wish was realised.
According to the Mail on Sunday, which obtained the official statistics of 37 police forces under the Freedom of Information Act, there is an offence involving a knife every 24 minutes of the day in England.
There were over 5,500 serious crimes involving knives in just three months this year - one every 24 minutes. That is 55 knife-related murders and more than 2,000 stabbings. [And that figure does not include data from Northamptonshire, Somerset and Lincolnshire - Ed]
The newspaper explained:-
Our elites have imported gang warfare while pretending that the immigrants were soft, sentimental like pets and if we were nice to them they would be nice to us!
Common sense tells people that immigrant areas are no longer safe for white people to live in. But to obfuscate the facts, a 9 percent reduction in crime is claimed by the police, with the violent crime sector being reduced by 8 percent. As is now well known, in areas with much crime many people do not report burglaries or muggings because experience tells them that the police will do nothing about it. Less than half of such crimes are reported. It is a deceit visited upon the population by a government who cannot control crime because they are acolytes of the religion of equality, and no racial or ethnic group can be more inclined to certain crimes than any other.
The average IQ of the prison population in Britain, including blacks and other low IQ peoples, is around 87. In Australia it’s a little better, with 40% reporting an IQ below 86. So I guess the white section of the US prison population is unlikely to weigh in with an average IQ above 90. Average mind. Fifty percent of them don’t make it out of the 80s.
And wouldn’t the media boys just love this one to be true?
Charlene’s mother and father spoke briefly to reporters on the steps of the courthouse (video).
The outcome is, perhaps, not surprising given the quality of the evidence presented to the court. In the absence of DNA evidence, an audio recording of the barely distinguishable voices of Albattikhi and his business partner Mohammed Reveshi seems to have been the principal exhibit. The two men denied even knowing Charlene, and claimed that references to her on the recording were totally innocent and misunderstood. In the normal course of things, and assuming that no new evidence is unearthed by Lancashire Police, this should be enough to see them escape conviction next year.
I would very much like to know the ethnic make-up of the twelve men and women of the jury, and how they divided in the jury room. I would also like to know whether the accepted fact of child abuse by “some of the men” working in the takeaways frequented by Charlene and other girls has triggered a police investigation. I doubt it. Other instances of grooming of white girls by Moslems in England’s northern towns have been ignored by police. They would, after all, generate the “continuous tensions and pressure” referred to by Justice Henriques.
Some time ago I wrote saying that all ethnic minorities, as well as a good number of white liberals, are anti-white racists. I didn’t mean in-your-face, Nation-of-Islam-style racism, but the subtle, unthinking, subliminal kind. Now I think I was being too kind. There’s nothing subtle about the views which have to underlie the following actions:
Finding and bringing to justice the criminal who raped white women is seen as less important than making sure that the man arrested isn’t an ethnic minority. If the suspect isn’t guilty, all he’ll suffer is a bit of inconvenience, surely a worthwhile price to pay along the road to catching the actual criminal. On the other hand if he is the rapist, then we’re seeing an ethnic minority criminal getting away with it purely so as to protect the image of his ethnicity; in other words, creating an artificially positive picture of minority ethnicities is more important than saving white women from actual sexual assaults.
Whichever is the case, we are seeing ethnic feelings and image being put above white lives. Infact, is it even possible to have a sensible discussion about these crimes which leads to the conclusion come to by the CRE? Or do the multiculti need to find a corner of their own - preferably financed by HRM’s government - and to boldly go where no sane white man will ever go?
(Apologies to Lurker. No apologies whatsoever to the Grauniad).
My thanks to Donna and Sue on the Charlene thread that has been simmering away since March 2006, and to the untangled refusnik named Smith, all of whom have provided “heads-up” gen on the trial now begun at Preston Crown Court of (alleged) burger-bar butcher and paedophile Iyad Albittikhi.
The good news is that the MSM has finally begun reporting Charlene’s fate, locally and nationally. This is an advance, obviously, on the near-perfect silence that greeted the breakthrough of the initial arrest and commital to trial. But it remains a cause of journalistic shame that such an exceptional and vile crime against a 14-year old adolescent girl is acknowledged only in the judicial breach, so to speak, and is then accorded a completely unacceptable and thusfar universal shunning of the central feature of the case.
Look, for example, at the headline of the Mail article: Killer joked that he put schoolgirl lover in his kebabs. Schoolgirl lover?
In the body of the copy we read that prosecuting council Tim Holroyde, QC, told Preston Crown Court:-
This entry on Stratclyde Police’s website appears to have been picked up by local media, thence the BBC and AP. Well, it’s evil white racism against a poor Algerian asylum seeker and her child, isn’t it? Or is it?
No mention yet of video or DNA evidence, which would seal the issue. But we’ll see.
Everyone familiar with “American” cinema knows the routine: enlightened carpetbaggers take a wrong turn and wind up in a redneck backwater and subjected to its twisted version of the justice system.
But, outside Jewry’s Bizarro World media, one needn’t foray into flyover country to find racist, particularist “justice.” No, just step out onto the streets of New York.
When a white man is chased by negroids who shout “get the white boy,” and he dies after fleeing into traffick, it’s not a “hate crime.”
When a white couple accidentally bump a mongoloid’s vehicle, and are savagely beaten by the mongoloid shouting “fucking haole,” it’s not a “hate crime.”
When towelheads beat a white man to death after shouting “get that white mother fucker!,” it’s not a “hate crime.”
When a white man chases and beats a negroid for robbing him (who admitted to police he returned to the white neighborhood to steal a car) and shouts “nigger,” it is “hate crime” (the Jew mayor demanded the charges) and he gets 15 years.
Be careful which backwater you wander into; there’s no telling what kind of hillbilly “justice” you’ll be getting.
Spanish and Latin American youths clash in Madrid
Spanish youths battle immigrant gangs near Madrid
Madrid clashes over Latin gangs
Now, an unkind and perhaps even nasty (as the silly woman with the shoes would have it) critic might point out that much of this crime has been committed by members of the various ethnic communities with which New Labour have been flooding Britain. Of course, such objections would be simply and purely malicious. After all, as Rachel Briggs of Demos tells us that these communities ‘add a cultural je ne sais quoi to the UK.’ It’s just as well for her that she isn’t quite certain what they bring to the UK. Those who do know tell their kids not to go out to play and await the next riot.
Fortunately she wasn’t too high-up in the Chosen Classes (only an “indie actress” after all); otherwise too many of the self-chosen might be forced to consider whether “racism” or “xenophobia” or “anti-immigrant hysteria” might’ve saved her life.
The Brit papers are all over Sir Ian Blair’s eggregiously correct Met this morning, following the fun news that a Muslim member of the Diplomatic Protection Squad was re-assigned at his own request from guarding the Israeli Embassy in London.
Apparently, the officer concerned, one PC Alexander Omar Basha, suffered moral qualms at his presence on the steps of the Embassy while the occupants’ friends and family were bombing Lebanon. The last Merkava 4 has rolled back across the border and PC Basha is working normally again. But the damage is done. And, it seems to me, in a couple of ways.
First, professionally. The man who is quoted everywhere this morning is John O’Connor, a former Flying Squad commander. He told the Sun:-
But if it was just a question of professionalism Sir Ian would not have reacted so jumpily in ordering an urgent review of the decision to grant PC Basha’s request. No Commissioner has been more political than this one. He has made politics paramount in his beloved creation, the Metrocultural Police Service. But leftist idealism like his always justifies its little political crimes by the presumption of Good, and that presumption is glorious, hypocritical toast if a discomforted Muslim must be moved from any duty on grounds, basically, of faith or even evil race. Sir Ian’s progressive, inclusive Met is stripped of all moral force. It’s a joke, and I or anybody else can refuse to give a witness statement, for example, to any minority garbed in blue simply because that is the dictate of conscience. Muslim, Hindu, black, queer, they’re all fair game.
As multicultural luck would have it, Sir Ian’s truest friends have very quickly worked this out and come forward with a possible answer.
The chairman of the Association of Muslim Police, Superintendent Dal Babu, insists that the Basha issue was not one of conscience:-
Of course, it’s all just sophistry. There are no clear dividing lines between conscience and welfare in the aims of Mr Babu’s association. They intertwine and dissolve within the peculiar whole of Islam:-
People are not cyphers. That’s the problem. But neither is multiracialism remotely normal. As long as there are a hundred and fifty varieties of humanity in my capital city we must all be equal under the law, and the law must be enforced by serving policemen with as complete an impartiality as humanly possible. Cyphers the police must indeed be.
In contrast, however, Sir Ian truly, madly, deeply believes that the Met must look like those one hundred and fifty varieties of homo sapiens wandering the streets. He is simply wrong.
This will be a short post. Interracial crime is worse than intraracial crime because interracial crime leads to racism, which is a thought crime and grounds for firing, divorce, ostracization, anti-social behavior, etc. In other words, interracial crime is worse because it does more damage.
Note: this is a speculative post, and its purpose is QA testing; rip it apart folks.
We have grown accustomed to living under the constant threat of a terror attack. This news would have shocked us a decade ago, but not anymore:
The response to this attack has been equally predictable, with the Home Office raising the security alert to its highest level and banning taking any liquids onto airplanes. We can further expect more calls for ID cards, a heightened level of surveillance and more funding for the government’s security agencies. In short, what can be summed up as giving up more of our long-treasured liberties, as one radio commentator alluded.
Such a course of action will be foolhardy and fruitless; it will not make us significantly safer. The government could scrap the entirety of the Magna Carta, ignore every single international treaty it has ever signed (that’ll be the day…), put a surveillance camera onto every single street corner and increase security spending to unimaginable levels. It could abolish Parliament (which, judging by recent legislation, is its fondest desire), institute a semi-totalitarian order, but we could still expect another successful terrorist attack.
It must be hard being a feminist. You preach about the equality of the sexes (sorry, genders). You give lectures explaining in great depth the oppressive nature of marriage and courtship. You heckle happily married neighbours into admitting that they’re “socially unfulfilled”. You take part in group readings of Virginia Woolf. And at the end of it all, some bloke with a belt comes along and upsets the whole (progressive, gender-free) applecart:
The mother of Charles de Menzies, who was mistakenly shot by policemen a year ago, is demanding the police be charged:
She certainly has a good case, as the police apparently did not have any evidence that the man was a suicide bomber:
De Menzies may have been an illegal immigrant, but he most certainly did not deserve to be shot in cold blood. The only reason he met his untimely grave was that the pc-inundated police officers could not tell the difference between an Arab (a security risk) and a Hispanic (not a security risk). His blood covers the hands of not just the constabularies in question, but also those of every single Cultural Marxist who has peddled this nonsense about Muslims being no different from the rest of us.
If you’re a coroner.
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa