Category: National Socialism

Majority Rights: For Those Who Will See The Obvious..


That Hitler and the Nazis were not White/European nationalists, nor can they represent the interests of White/European peoples.

I would like to clear the way further for Majority Rights as a place of sanity for White interests.

Indeed, if a former head of state where I am from had the attitude toward Germans and Germany that Hitler had, for example, toward Slavs and Eastern Europe, frankly, I would not boast of this man, but would be eager to leave him in the past as an embarrassing expression of overcompensation. I am frankly surprised that this is not the default position of every self-identifying White nationalist.

Hitler’s was a position which could only have led to inter-European fighting and diversion from our proper organization.

On the other hand, the Germans I meet in my travels, by sharp contrast, are very fine people; I am eager to help them, as I might, to ensure the flourishing of their particular native European form and ways; as well as to unburden them of undue guilt and foreign impositions. This generation had nothing to do with World War II, for better or worse. I am sure that there are sufficient many of them who see fit to participate in our mutual and discreet survivals as European nations and peoples.

I was ready to dive right-in with this frame of mind years, in fact decades, ago. One of the crucial issues obstructing this has been, and is, the absurd position of some self-proclaimed White Nationalists that we somehow need Hitler or to redeem Hitler. We need nothing of the kind. We need Europeans deeper and wiser. Let there be no mistake, those who insist upon Hitler and Nazism are Not White Nationalists.


Posted by DanielS on Sunday, April 20, 2014 at 01:37 AM in ActivismAnti-racism and white genocideEuropean NationalismFar RightLiberalism & the LeftMarxism & Culture WarNational Socialism
Comments (0) | Tell-a-Friend

Nazism As Overstated Premise of White Nationalism and False Either/Or

Border changes after World War II

It is a particularly important preliminary note that there is virtually nobody here who had anything to do with events of World War II. That fact is most relevant. Under that rubric, let us begin:

Hitler and Nazism as an overstated premise in representation of White/European nationalism; and Hitler and Nazism or the international Jew as false either/or.


Working hypotheses will be advanced

as to why these logical fallacies are being adopted despite their apparent obviousness;

how they are mistaken;

and remedies will be proposed in cooperative nationalism.

Statements will be set out as hypotheses to allow for efficient positioning of historical viewpoints as they emerge practical in argumentative service of cooperative European nationalism. In addition to the practical efficiency of hypotheses for unburdening detail, the modesty of unfinished claims is meant to facilitate participation from the commentariat to elaborate, correct and amend the hypotheses - i.e., to make optimal use of Majority Rights discussion format.

* Note: in comment number 2, I erred in grammatical present tense when discussing Brelsau (Wroclaw). Which, according to the Treaty of Versailles and through World War II, remained German. There would have been no good argument to that point in time for its not being German.



Posted by DanielS on Friday, October 25, 2013 at 05:22 AM in DemographicsEthnicity and Ethnic Genetic InterestsEuropean NationalismHistoryMarxism & Culture WarNational SocialismPolitical PhilosophyThat Question AgainThe American rightWhite Nationalism
Comments (77) | Tell-a-Friend

Christianity As Expression of Authentic European Culture

GW has expressed the constraint:

“It is a pity that Christianity, as flawed as it is from a European racial perspective, is undeniably part of the unity of north and south.  We are stuck with it, for it has been too close for too long to us - and the faithful must have their faith expressions, after all.”

DanielS has expressed the constraint:

“Adding yet another knot in the tangle is the argument that with the Christian texts already being the terms in which many of our people think, the currency for two thousand years now, there must be some ontological basis beneath, and we may as well find the positive logic to it for our purposes. However, with the texts being what they are, the motivations of the texts being as convoluted, Jewish and ambiguous as they were to begin, all that winds-up happening with the deciphering of our “true” logic behind Christianity is a contribution to the mess.”

An approach offered by John Harland is to admit the historicity of Jesus in His essential mythic image as descendant of God evidenced in his own over-ruling of texts with direct bodily connection with God as Father, but to deny the historicity of the extant texts—deny them as yet another means by which dastards attempt to interpose themselves between the God-heritage of individuals and their Father, in spirit and flesh.

Ridicule of Harland’s own editing of the texts to suit his view may be conducted only at the sacrifice of the two constraints establishing the context of this presentation. Offer a superior approach if you don’t like Harland’s—either that or declare folly the entire effort to connect with the spiritual force of Christianity.

Click this link for a pdf document containing part of Harland’s account starting with “The Germans” (in the anthropological sense meaning what many identify as Celtic and Nordic pagans of the pre-Christian era), “The Catholic Church Promotes Judeo-Christianity”, “The First Breaking Apart of the Church Serpent” (regarding Henry VIII and Martin Luther), “A Further Break From the Serpent” (regarding the establishment of America), “The Strange Phenomenon of ‘Money-Mad’ Americans” (regarding the closing of the frontier and replacement of Nature and Nature’s God with money-based “culture”), “The American Dream” (the commodification, by conspirators, of the American spiritual renaissance), “The German Reich” (the parallel processes occurring in what became the nation state known as “Germany” during the 1800s leading up to WW I), “The World Picture After WW I” (the situation leading up to WW II) and the concluding section of this pdf document is “The Second World War”.

The entire book is “Word Controlled Humans” by John Harland, ISBN 0-914752-12-X available from Sovereign Press, 326 Harris Road, Rochester, WA 98579 (with which I have no business or personal relationship).

Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 at 08:37 PM in AnthropologyArcheologyBooksChristianityConservatismEuropean cultureHistoryNational SocialismPolitical PhilosophyPsychologyRevisionismSocial SciencesThe Ontology ProjectU.S. Politics
Comments (257) | Tell-a-Friend

On the funding of Hitler and the NSDAP by international bankers

ZionCrimeFactory, one of the people behind the prothink network I recently promoted, has taken issue with the claim that international bankers funded Hitler and the NSDAP into power. He said:

As far as Hitler being funded by Jews is concerned, this is not the case. Anthony Sutton’s allegations rests in part on a fraudulent book called Hitler’s Secret Bankers by the mysterious entity calling itself Sidney Warburg. Michael Collins Piper mentions this fraud in his commentary on these false theories concerning the funding of Hitler.

Anthony Sutton was a Jewish agent who, in his other book about Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, denied that Jews and Jewish bankers were behind Bolshevism and the communist seizure of power in Russia, calling it a “conspiracy theory.”

You write: “In contrast, zioncrimefactory cited Niall Ferguson against the contention that Jewish bankers funded the NSDAP in spite of acknowledging that Ferguson was commissioned by the Rothschilds to lie about their history.”

No I cited a portion of text from Niall Ferguson’s Rothschild book to demonstrate the absurdity of the claim that Hitler was an agent of the Rothschild family by showing how Hitler seized the palaces and assets of three branches of the House of Rothschild in Germany, France and Austria, and sent members of this family into exile before and during WW2. This fact is corroborated by other sources as well and is not disputed, other than by ignoramuses on the internet who dismiss anything that doesn’t fit with the nonsense theory that Hitler was a Rothschild descendant or Rothschild agent, a theory that originated with anti-Nazi propagandists in the Jew-run OSS.

A lot of these myths about the founding and funding of the NSDAP are laid to rest in this article by Veronica Clark:

Let’s look at the matter.


Posted by R-news on Wednesday, July 11, 2012 at 11:10 PM in Economics & FinanceMarxism & Culture WarNational SocialismPolitical analysisRevisionismThat Question AgainWorld Affairs
Comments (14) | Tell-a-Friend

Hitler and a Historian

Hitler and a Historian
Robert E. Reis

ONE of the world’s most notorious self-proclaimed experts on the Holocaust is Professor Christopher R. Browning. He has appeared as a hired expert witness at several legal actions. 
He is now the Frank Porter Graham Professor of History at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He was a witness against Ernst Zündel in Canada and against David Irving in the United Kingdom.

This essay is an examination of the evidence Browning puts forth in his book The Path To Genocide: Essays on Launching the Final Solution (Cambridge University Press, Canto Edition, 1995)
The title of this collection of essays makes it clear that Professor Browning believes that a form of genocide was unleashed by responsible German officials upon the Jews of Europe and that he is convinced that he has discovered the manner in which the decision or decisions were made to perpetrate this crime. I intend to analyze this book as a work of historical scholarship to see what kind of evidence Professor Browning uses and how he interprets it in the context of his title.


Posted by Robert Reis on Sunday, September 6, 2009 at 09:56 PM in National Socialism
Comments (18) | Tell-a-Friend

A discussion with Northerner and Desmond

Following his intervention on my Steve Jones post, and his subsequent attempt to demonstrate an Aryan genetic superiority over non-Aryan Europeans, our friend Northerner has found himself hosting a chat between Desmond Jones and myself.  For anyone who is unable to sleep, the soporific effects of a rambling, incoherent discussion about National Socialism are guaranteed effective, especially when that discussion is between such philosophical non-supremacists as Desmond and myself.

I only mention it in passing.

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, October 17, 2008 at 06:26 PM in National Socialism
Comments (69) | Tell-a-Friend

Thoughts on David Irving

I note that The Wall St. Journal has editorialized in defence of imprisoned historian David Irving.  Excerpt:  “And just when the Danish government is under unprecedented attack for its refusal to intervene in the editorial decision-making of a private newspaper, it seems perverse to offer Muslim provocateurs an example of a European country catering to one set of sensitivities but not another”.

The WSJ accompanies this defence, however, with vast aspersions on the character and competence of Irving.  But any claim that Irving is incompetent is absurd.  I have been studying the Hitler era for over 40 years and it is clear to me that NOBODY knows the period better or in more detail than Irving does.  He was after all the only one of the many eminent historians consulted who immediately picked the Kujau “Hitler Diaries” as a fake. 


Posted by jonjayray on Friday, February 24, 2006 at 07:36 AM in National Socialism
Comments (33) | Tell-a-Friend

Nazis at Cronulla?  By their flag ye shall know them

Note the report below:

“Extremist groups accused of links to neo-Nazis have admitted mobilising more than 100 people to attend the riots in Cronulla.  Jim Saleam, the New South Wales secretary of ultra-nationalist group Australia First, said his members had recruited up to 120 people for the rally but denied they were involved in violence. “We do have some local supporters and these guys mobilised their family friends, mates, work-mates, associates, every Jack and Harry, to come,” he said.

NSW Police Minister Carl Scully confirmed that extremists had taken part in the riots.  “There appears to be an element of white supremacists and they really have no place in mainstream Australian society,” he said. “Those sort of characters belong in Berlin 1930s.”

Skinheads wearing boots, braces and neo-Nazi emblems were among the mob of 5000. Three far-right organisations - Australia First, The Patriotic Youth League and the Newcastle-based Blood and Honour - handed out pamphlets.  All three are considered to have neo-Nazi links.  Australia First and the PYL deny any association”

More here


Posted by jonjayray on Wednesday, December 14, 2005 at 12:14 AM in National Socialism
Comments (115) | Tell-a-Friend

Socialist Germany:  The old is new again

I believe that there was some suggestion that posts about Nazism should be strictly limited here.  I can see some point in that but I cannot see that posts which mock Nazism do much harm:

“A multimillion-dollar campaign to boost Germans’ low self-confidence has backfired after it emerged that its slogan was coined by the Nazis. The $34 million “Du Bist Deutschland—You Are Germany”—campaign was devised to inspire Germans to stop moaning and do something good for their country. Beethoven, Einstein and the sports stars Franz Beckenbauer and Michael Schumacher have been cited in advertisements encouraging Germans to take more pride in their homeland. 

But a historian from Ludwigshafen has provoked an uproar with his discovery that the same “Du Bist Deutschland” cry was used at Nazi rallies in the 1930s. Stefan Morz uncovered photographs of a 1935 Nazi convention in which soldiers display a banner reading, in Gothic script, “Denn Du Bist Deutschland (Because You Are Germany).” The slogan was topped with the head of Adolf Hitler. Leading Nazis such as Hermann Goring and Joseph Goebbels attended the event.”

(Excerpt from here)

The Nazi connection is not as obscure as the article excerpted above pretends.  One of Hitler’s favourite slogans was: “Um uns ist Deutschland. In uns marschiert Deutschland. Und hinter uns kommt Deutschland!”.  Like much of Hitler’s rhetoric it cannot be translated in a way that gives much idea of the impact of the original but it literally means:  “Around us is Germany, In us Germany marches and behind us comes Germany”.  So the basic idea behind the modern slogan and Nazi thinking is pretty similar:  Identifying the individual with the nation and making Germany a sort of mystical icon.  All very Hegelian!

Posted by jonjayray on Saturday, November 26, 2005 at 11:22 PM in National Socialism
Comments (16) | Tell-a-Friend

An amazing snippet of history

I am always pointing out how Leftist Hitler was—despite the hugely successful Leftist “big lie” to brand him as a Rightist.  I am putting up a picture of a Nazi propaganda poster of the 1930s that you won’t believe unless you are aware of how readily all Leftists preach one thing and do another.  It reads ““Mit Hitler gegen den Ruestungswahnsinn der Welt”.

And what does that mean?  It means “With Hitler against the armaments madness of the world”.  “Ruestung” could more precisely be translated as “military preparations” but “armaments” is a bit more idiomatic in English.

So the preaching of “peace” by the bloodthirsty Soviet regime of the cold war period had its parallel with the Nazis too.

Posted by jonjayray on Monday, October 10, 2005 at 01:12 PM in National Socialism
Comments (7) | Tell-a-Friend

Why Hitler hated Jews

Hitler was wrong about the Jews but why he thought what he did is only a mystery if you want it to be

How do we explain Hitler’s attitudes towards the Jews?  Dietrich (1988) studied Hitler’s antisemitism at great length and concluded that Hitler’s antisemitism was only a minor part of his popular appeal to Germans.  One reason why that was so is the important but seldom stressed fact that there was nothing at all odd or unusual about a dislike of Jews almost anywhere in the world of the 1930s.  Hitler was to a considerable degree simply voicing the conventional wisdom of his times and he was far from alone in doing so.  The plain fact is that it was not just the Nazis who brought about the holocaust.  To its shame, the whole world did.  That part of the world under Hitler’s control in general willingly assisted in rounding up Jews while the rest of the world refused to take Jewish refugees who tried to escape —just as the world would later refuse many Vietnamese and Cambodian refugees and will in due course refuse to take other would-be refugees from other places.  Racial affect is now recognized as universal in psychology textbooks (Brown, 1986) and Anti-Semitism is, sad to say, an old and widely popular European tradition.  There seems to be considerable truth in the view that the Nazis just applied German thoroughness to it. 

Nonetheless, Hitler was undoubtedly more than usually obsessed by the Jews.  What made him so obsessed?  What in particular made him BECOME antisemitic?  Mein Kampf is unreliable as objective history but there can be little doubt that it is good psychological history—i.e. it records Hitler’s own history as he saw it. And what he says there is that in Linz—where he grew up—there were few Jews and he saw them at that time as no different from other Germans. So when he moved to Vienna he was horrified at the antisemitism of much of the Viennese press. As he says in Mein Kampf:

“For the Jew was still characterized for me by nothing but his religion, and therefore, on grounds of human tolerance, I maintained my rejection of religious attacks in this case as in others. Consequently, the tone, particularly that of the Viennese anti-Semitic press, seemed to me unworthy of the cultural tradition of a great nation”.


Posted by jonjayray on Friday, June 24, 2005 at 07:11 PM in National Socialism
Comments (311) | Tell-a-Friend

Thoughts on the Hitler film, “The Downfall”

From Luis Afonso Assumpcao.  With stylistic revisions by John Ray

The great revelation of this film for me was the perception that all socialist-communist-facist-totalitarian regimes are in some degree a substitution of a “state religion” for a natural religion.  And Nazism was a substitute for Judaism—a sort of “state Judaism”.  But this “state Judaism” has in common with the original one as much as a black mass has with a Catholic mass: equal values but with a minus sign.  A satanic counterfeit of the former, in fact.  This imitation – as “ersatz” as the robotic Maria from “Metropolis” - wanted to take over the cultural and religious identity of the original model, even if the complete destruction of its model was necessary.


Posted by jonjayray on Friday, June 17, 2005 at 04:29 AM in National Socialism
Comments (40) | Tell-a-Friend

Socialism and nationalism

I have not kept a note of it but I guess one of the readers here has:  The finding that people are more willing to share with others whom they see as like themselves.  That leads to the view that socialism will find its main support among an ethnically homogeneous population—which the Scandinavian countries were until recently.  And ethnic diversity therefore will undermine support for socialism.  I have myself commented that the frantically socialist Scots are a very brotherly lot.  And of course Frank Salter’s reasoning would support that too.

And being very anti-socialist, I think that relationship reinforces my view that SELECTED ethnic diversity (such as we have in Australia)  has much to be said for it.  I am again in that very Anglo-Saxon conservative middle of the road position where I support neither totally open nor totally closed borders.

What has provoked this post is that Hitler saw the same point long before anybody else that I know.  If you go here, you will see an original 1939 Nazi propaganda placard promoting one of Hitler’s sayings.  The saying is, “Es gibt keinen Sozialismus, der nicht aufgeht im eigenem Volk”—which I translate as “There is no socialism except what arises within its own people”.  Hitler spoke a very colloquial German so translating that one was not easy but I think that is about as close to it as you can get.

I have documented at some length elsewhere the way in which Hitler foreshadowed most of the ideas of the modern Leftists but they do not see that their promoting of infinite diversity will undermine support for socialism.  Hitler did.

Posted by jonjayray on Monday, June 6, 2005 at 06:12 AM in National Socialism
Comments (16) | Tell-a-Friend

Hitler again:  Myths versus fact

Nazism was a popular, working-class movement but it was Green/Left, not “Rightist”

The fact that the recent Minnesota school massacre was done by a young admirer of Hitler will of course have the Leftist bloggers frothing at the mouth and trying to prove that conservatives are to blame—because Hitler was “Rightist”, you see.  The fact that Hitler’s most unrelenting opponent was the arch-Conservative Winston Churchill and the fact that Hitler started out his war in alliance with the Communist Stalin will not be mentioned of course.  Leftists have no trouble ignoring even the most basic facts of history.  And it has always been a mystery how Leftists can call “conservative” a man who imposed such vast changes on Germany—considering that Leftists define conservatism as “opposition to change”!

What the media is notably ignoring is that, although he was no conservative, Hitler WAS a Greenie—and the Hitler-admiring groups that the shooter was linked to were environmental extremists.


Posted by jonjayray on Tuesday, March 22, 2005 at 10:46 PM in National Socialism
Comments (25) | Tell-a-Friend

Zionist Aspirations in Palestine

This post is to be read together with my comments on John Ray’s post on Nazism. John points out thoughtfully that Nazism and Communism had many similarities, that the Nazis were “Socialists”. My answer to that is, “So what?”. “Socialism” can take many shapes and forms. Zionism was a completely socialist movement from the outset. Is it the same as Nazism or Communism?

Some might disagree on the question of the “Socialist” element to Zionism. This is a reproduction of an excellent article by the British governor of Palestine during WWI. His observations on the “bolsheviki” element in Zionism are quite startling to the lay person but would come as no surprise to knowledgeable historians.


Posted by Phil Peterson on Sunday, March 13, 2005 at 08:56 AM in National Socialism
Comments (7) | Tell-a-Friend

Neo-Nazis as out-of-fashion thinkers

I have already pointed out at length that Hitler was a Leftist in terms of the Leftism of his day and that practically all of his thinking was prefigured in the thinking of Marx & Engels.

If he was so Leftist, however, how come that Hitler’s few remaining admirers in at least the Anglosphere countries all seem to be on the political far-Right?  This tiny band even refer to themselves as “The Right”, in fact.  How do I know that?  I know that because I in fact happen to be one of the very few people to have studied neo-Nazis intensively.  And I have reported my findings about them in the academic journals —see here and here.


Posted by jonjayray on Saturday, March 12, 2005 at 07:54 PM in National Socialism
Comments (49) | Tell-a-Friend

image of the day

Existential Issues

White Genocide Project

Of note

Majority Radio

Recent Comments

Also see trash folder.

Bill commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 12:20 PM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 11:08 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 10:47 AM. (go) (view)

Bill commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 06:43 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 05:19 AM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 04:30 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/20/14, 04:07 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 03:26 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 03:16 AM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/20/14, 03:14 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Forty-five years of thought-free liberal-left emotionalism on race and immigration' on 04/19/14, 10:53 PM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/19/14, 06:16 PM. (go) (view)

Morgoth commented in entry 'A Journey to The Hague – Chapter Two' on 04/19/14, 06:41 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Journey to The Hague – Chapter Two' on 04/17/14, 05:58 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'A Journey to The Hague – Chapter Two' on 04/17/14, 02:25 AM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'A Journey to The Hague – Chapter Two' on 04/16/14, 05:45 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Weev Speaks: Hypocrites and Pharisees' on 04/16/14, 04:39 PM. (go) (view)

neil vodavzny commented in entry 'The politics of culture - Part 2' on 04/16/14, 10:30 AM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'Competition's Ontological Adjustment:' on 04/16/14, 05:33 AM. (go) (view)

Mick Lately commented in entry 'The politics of culture - Part 2' on 04/16/14, 04:54 AM. (go) (view)

Guessedworker commented in entry 'A Journey to The Hague – Chapter Two' on 04/16/14, 02:00 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'White Post Modernity' on 04/15/14, 08:51 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/15/14, 01:27 PM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Pravy Sektor, Ukraine's soldiers of the revolution' on 04/15/14, 01:18 PM. (go) (view)

Leon Haller commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/15/14, 07:15 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/15/14, 04:11 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Joseph Paul Franklin: April 13, 1950 -' on 04/15/14, 01:54 AM. (go) (view)

Desmond Jones commented in entry 'A Journey to The Hague – Chapter Two' on 04/15/14, 01:01 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'The politics of culture - Part 2' on 04/14/14, 11:54 AM. (go) (view)

Thorn commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/14/14, 11:44 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/14/14, 11:38 AM. (go) (view)

Gudmund commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/14/14, 11:28 AM. (go) (view)

Gudmund commented in entry 'National Revolution - turn on, tune in, take over!' on 04/14/14, 11:07 AM. (go) (view)

neil vodavzny commented in entry 'The politics of culture - Part 2' on 04/14/14, 09:56 AM. (go) (view)

DanielS commented in entry 'Why Hitler hated Jews' on 04/14/14, 02:20 AM. (go) (view)

General News

Science News

All Categories

The Writers

Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.


Endorsement not implied.

Anti-White Media


Controlled Opposition






Nationalist Political Parties


Whites in Africa