Category: Activism

Steven Palesi’s INTERNET ACTIVIST HANDBOOK

Steven is one of the most talented, perspicacious and downright interesting, not to mention determined guys to hit WN in America in years.  And I don’t think that’s just my opinion.  He has the knack of reducing arguments to their core, and the energy to plant them in all corners of the liberal universe.

GW

A compilation of original and (yes, especially) unoriginal thoughts and suggestions for the internet warrior.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Setting Up an Internet Activism Platform
2. Using the Internet Activism Platform
3. Advanced Activism - Stealth Operations
4. Advanced Activism - Psychological Warfare

Our children are being subjected to an ever increasing list of RACE LAWS designed to discriminate against them simply because they’re white.  In addition, recent demographic data shows white kids will soon represent a minority of new births nationwide.  The racial majority of the future will believe, as it believes now as a minority, that white-skins conceal hate-filled and irredeemable hearts, and a political cunning that leads directly to oppression, enslavement and genocide.  That is only what they are being taught today and every day.

But even if we take a less apocalyptic view, the prospect is grim:-

#  More affirmative action discrimination in education
# More no whites allowed race based private scholarships
#  More race quotas in private hiring
#  More race norming of employment tests
#  More separate pool executive hiring
#  More minority layoff protection
#  More sensitivity training
#  More minority promotion networks
#  More no whites allowed contract set-asides
#  More minority-only tax breaks

Add that up and you get an ever-increasing racist discrimination against them for being white - and only for being white.

Suffering this, along with all the bigotry and chauvenism that will accompany it, in silence is not the white way to live.  I expect they will ask us why we did this to them.  Why did we simply acquiesce while the power elite and their minority clients re-arranged our country’s demographics and maximized minority privileges.  They will also ask us whether we resisted or collaborated.

What will your answer be?

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Friday, April 20, 2007 at 07:13 PM in Activism
Comments (23) | Tell-a-Friend

A call for a radical right intellectual schwerpunkt

We will establish a network of experts, farsighted thinkers, political fora and discussion meetings.  We will thereby deepen and continually further develop the concept of the New Centre and the Third Way.  This is the priority for us.

From the Blair-Schroeder Third Way document issued 6th August 1999.

... the credibility of the EPA [US Environmental Protection Agency - Ed] is defeatable, but not on the basis of ETS [environmental tobacco smoke - Ed) alone.  It must be part of a larger mosaic that concentrates all the EPA’s enemies against it at one time.

From an internal memo leaked from Philip Morris during the “junk science” wars of the 80s and 90s.

Today I happened across a review at Amazon Books of Frank Salter’s On Genetic Interests.  It was posted by one J. P. Rushton “Prof”, and is one of a select group of reviews that he has posted.  I find that fact both surprising and heartening.  The MacDonald list aside, perhaps, precious little evangelism is undertaken by our own intellectuals.  Prof Rushton ranks high in the Euro-loyal elite, certainly on the empirical wing.  It is good to see him speaking to the humble nationalist bookworm.  I certainly could not object if he and our other leading thinkers deigned to speak to the occasional blogworm as well.

And yet, in my heart I know that that would not be the most productive use of their time.  In matters of elite communication, productivity is measured by weight not volume.  Speaking to power is the duty and privilege of an intellectual elite, and that is no less true of ours than of any other.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, March 14, 2007 at 09:15 PM in Activism
Comments (38) | Tell-a-Friend

Is a rearguard action the only available option?

Street theatre is a very good way of getting the message across, as are publicity stunts.  But you’re right, there is very little that can be achieved through politics in the current climate and most of my own recent activities have been centred not just on music but also hiking, making runestaffs and producing a series of booklets for Woden’s Folk.  Political parties are designed precisely for that, politics.  National-Anarchists and the New Right, on the other hand, must focus upon intellectual warfare and the development of a counter-cultural avant-garde.  People in our circles must express themselves, bring their talents to the fore and do all they can to assemble a philosophical and artistic elite that can radically change the direction of modern society.  Don’t subscribe to folkish ideals, live them out.  Don’t talk about history, make it. Have children, teach them at home.  Remember, you live on through them.  All these things are essential.  If we don’t do this, our values will die.

Troy Southgate, quoted at Stormfront in a thread-starter by NZ New Right intellectual and activist, Welf Herfurth.

Troy and I have some differences on the matter of “the way forward”.  I much admire him, but he takes the view that the loss of England’s cities is inevitable and permanent.  Consequently, we must regroup in the remaining living space, and live the healthy, bucolic life.  My England happens to include London and Leicester, Bradford and Birmingham.  It’s my country and I want it back, cities included (notwithstanding James’ arguments).

Besides, the Third World will never stop coming here, and never stop breeding here, never stop miscegenating here.  Troy’s idyll among the whale-backed hills and green meadows of the English countryside would, at best, be a brief respite.  Probably, it would not even be that.

Something more manful than the bucolic life, adorned by an approximation of Wodenism, is required to answer modernity.  And let’s be clear that we are creatures of modernity in positive as well as negative ways.  The West’s intellectual and technological advancement is part of who and what we are.  I would argue that making technological progress is much more “us” than making runestaffs, not least because it accords with our sociobiology - conflicted with Nature as we are.  I am not in favour of gratuitous Saxonry.  The gratuitous, the inauthentic is of no utility.

So, yes to the intellectual stimulation of politics from the “right”.  Yes to developing a successor to the decaying liberal zeitgeist.  Yes to developing a new, loyal, revolutionary elite.

This is the activism I understand, and which I believe to be capable of producing the genuinely large-scale political, cultural and demographic shifts on which our survival depends.

Posted by Guessedworker on Thursday, March 8, 2007 at 07:06 PM in Activism
Comments (46) | Tell-a-Friend

Sunic returns to the Political Cesspool

Following his excursion to the ‘pool last November, Tom Sunic is going back for another interview on the 16th February, 7.00pm local central USA time.  The topics will be the dangers of multiculturalism in the USA and ex-communist Yugoslavia, and his now imminent book, prefaced by Kevin MacDonald, Homo americanus: Child of the Postmodern Age.

I have to say that in its most eggregiously populist moments MR’s little audio adventure will never come within a country mile of the Political Cesspool.  Must be something in the water in Memphis, Tennessee.  But if you want to listen to Tom and you’re in Europe, you might need something a little stiffer than water to keep you company.  The show goes out at 2.00am Western European time.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, February 14, 2007 at 07:00 PM in Activism
Comments (0) | Tell-a-Friend

Nailing the “shiksa” label at Mercury News

The following is an e-mail sent by me in my capacity as Executive Secretary of ResistingDefamation.org to William Dean Singleton, Vice Chairman & CEO, MediaNews Group.  It was subject-titled “Hate Speech Unbound: Susan Goldberg & Bruce Newman”.

Susan Goldberg, executive editor of the San Jose Mercury News, and movie critic Bruce Newman struck a blow for the most loathsome kind of hate speech on page 1E in the Mercury News today, 2/2/07, by promoting two hate labels, “shiksa” and “WASP.”

We request that you terminate the employment of both Goldberg and Newman for cause, namely, spreading hatred toward an identifiable section of our community.

SHIKSA

The well-known and widely-recognized hate term shiksa was used in the following way in the second paragraph of the article:

She (Diane Keaton) won an Oscar as the ultimate shiksa (italicized in text)
in “Annie Hall,” so it’s a little unsettling now to see her trying to play the
most aggressive yente (italicized in text) the movies have produced since
“Fiddler On the Roof.”

By linking shiksa to yente and “Fiddler On the Roof,” Susan Goldberg and Bruce Newman explicitly declared the Jewish nature of shiksa which, we are told by Israel Shahak in “Jewish History, Jewish Religion” on page 26, is defined by the “Megiddo Modern Hebrew-English Dictionary,” published in Israel, as “unclean animal; loathsome creature, abomination.” It also has a colloquial meaning in America and Europe as “Christian whore.”

Somehow the director, Michael Lehmann, was spared any criticism for this film at all. We can only wonder why the director was spared when the female star was pilloried with racist terms.

Resisting Defamation, however, finds shiksa to be repugnant because it is a name for European American women that they did not choose for themselves. Its use is a claim to name all European American women by someone outside the class of people named which, in turn, requires that it be based on a claim to supremacy. That is, Goldberg and Newman openly lay claim to supremacy over (and the right to name) all European American women. We explicitly condemn their racist claim, and denounce them for claiming supremacy over all European American women. 

In addition, the term shiksa is used to demonstrate contempt (it’s not funny on any level) and to smother the diversity of those so-named. Its use in AD 2007 on the pages of the Mercury News is a shocking commentary on the bigotry that lies in the hearts and minds of Executive Editor Susan Goldberg and movie critic Bruce Newman.

We are not claiming that shiksa is “insensitive” or that its use is “offensive” to us. We are simply examining the minds and hearts of Goldberg and Newman, and asking that their employment be terminated.

WASP

The hate term WASP was used in the following way in the third paragraph of the article:

Of course, there’s nothing in the Talmud that says a WASP
can’t be just as meddling a matchmaker as Molly Picon…

We don’t know why Susan Goldberg and Bruce Newman explicitly linked WASP with the Talmud, but they clearly identified the term as a Jewish hate term this way. So let us look at WASP from a Jewish point of view. The Jewish analog is WEJ, a well known term of abuse for Jews which means White European Jew. Not having seen Newman, we don’t know what color he is, but Goldberg certainly qualifies as a WEJ, and we trust she won’t mind our tagging her with it in the same way she worked with Newman to tag European American women with WASP.

None of the Goldberg/Newman criticism of the film in question denigrates the director, Michael Lehmann. Could it be that he is spared name-calling because his last name isn’t Keaton? Readers want to know.

Resisting Defamation, however, finds the use of WASP to be repulsive because it is a name for European American men and women that they did not chose for themselves. Its use is a claim to have a supremacy power, the power to name those not in ones’ own group. We explicitly condemn Goldberg’s and Newman’s open claim to supremacy over (and the right to name) all European Americans.

WASP is used to demonstrate contempt and to smother the diversity of all European Americans. It is a “three-fer” in the world of hate speech by denigrating a skin color (white), an ethnicity (Anglo-Saxon), and a religion (Protestant Christians). Its use in AD 2007 on the pages of the Mercury News is just more commentary on the bigotry that lives in the minds and hearts of Executive Editor Susan Goldberg and movie critic Bruce Newman.

We are not claiming that use of WASP is “insensitive” or “offensive.” To see the entire hateful article go to one of these Internet addresses:

http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/16605377.htm [Ed -registration req]
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/entertainment/16605377.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp [Ed -registration req]

Stanley Womack
ResistingDefamation.org

Posted by Guest Blogger on Saturday, February 3, 2007 at 12:55 PM in Activism
Comments (24) | Tell-a-Friend

Political ice-breaking

This Times piece on the renaissance of the thinking Conservative right in Britain is instructive.  Perhaps.

Michael Gove, the Surrey Heath MP and housing spokesman for the Tories, is founding chairman of Policy Exchange and close to Mr Cameron. He said: “A precursor to electoral victory is victory in the battle of ideas and the battle for the agenda.”

... Most of the centre-right think-tanks are linked through a web of personal and professional connections, and many have close ties with the Conservative Party — although some fiercely defend their political independence.

They cover the entire range of issues, with Civitas — the Institute for the Study of Civil Society — wanting more family values, Reform campaigning for more market forces in public services, Open Europe opposing EU integration, the TaxPayers’ Alliance demanding lower taxes, Migrationwatch UK urging less immigration, Direct Democracy calling for more local decision making, and Policy Exchange, Mr Cameron’s favourite, establishing an agenda for compassionate Conservatism.

Research by The Times shows that five of the main new think-tanks — all formed since 2000 — are now quoted on average thirty times a week by national newspapers, three times more than two years ago.

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Friday, February 2, 2007 at 07:12 PM in Activism
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

Moral superiority yes, but Jared Taylor’s, not the Canadian left’s

This staggering National Post article by Canadian journalist Joseph Brean has already been given pride of place on today’s Amren page.  So, doubtless the first of a hundred or so outraged comments will shortly be appearing on the thread.  Desmond Jones sent me the link early today (very early, actually, Desmond), and I thought I would post it for the edification of those who do not frequent Jared Taylor’s place these days.

Brean’s treatment of Taylor is the most gratuitously snidey piece of work I have ever encountered, bar none.  There is not one substantive argument deployed against Taylor in it - only a catalogue of truly unpleasant little digs and twists of a fanatic’s knife.  Too many of them to recount here, too.  But, anyway, they really need to be read in context - which I urge you to do now, notwithstanding the length of the article (six pages).  If you get to the end of it without feeling that you have been kicked around by thieving beggars in some dog-turd dark Toronto alleyway you are a better man than I.

By way of a contrast, you can read the speech Taylor would have given in the Lord Nelson Hotel here had he been permitted to.  He effortlessly compiles the argument that Canada’s diversity is not a strength after all.  Canadian press reports make it for him actually, and very difficult to disagree with it is.  Certainly, Brean does not try.  One is forced to conclude that the non-existent case for multiculturalism and the vileness of Brean’s journalism are connected, the poverty of the one being neatly reflected in the indecency of the other.  The rest is barely controllable chagrin that the enemy carried the day precisely because the noisy morality the left so likes to ascribe to itself met - and was roundly defeated by - the real thing.

Taylor remains a class act.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, January 29, 2007 at 08:03 PM in Activism
Comments (35) | Tell-a-Friend

Activism for good writers

Back in September I posted a piece titled Why we do it … and is it enough?.  It flowed from a call from Rusty Mason for less focus on analysis and news and more action.  The post generated a long and lively thread.  Too lively in parts.

Anyhow, on Svi’s Inverted World thread the same demand for a more pro-active way forward at and beyond MR has surfaced via a couple of suggestions: one from JB, to whit:-

How about creating a ‘Activism’ section ?  Debating and talking among ourselves is alright but we have to expand and bring more of our people to the cause.

How about making a movie reviews section?  It would probably bring more traffic to the site.

Is there anything we can do to help you get that radio/podcasting station done?  Will Steven Palese be a regular?

... and the second from Lurker:-

Its been said before - do movie reviews on IMDb.com and vote for those you approve of.  Reviews that more people ‘find useful’ in imdb parlance get pushed up the ranks, just like on Amazon (who own IMDb).  They could be cross-posted here too.  If we knew they were there (on IMDb) we could then vote for them if we felt like it.

Now, Lurker is correct, the movie reviews idea has been floated before.  Much in the same vein the sturdy Calvin, he of the Vox Celtica, suggested concentrating reviews of appropriate books at Amazon .  We will fully support such suggestions.  I think that in response to the first time the movie reviews idea was floated I said something like, “OK, we will willingly open a page on that, linkable from the left column.  But we’ll need someone to step forward and take on responsibility for editing and generally nourishing it.”

Thereafter, silence.  But these things don’t just happen.  If you read this and think, “Hey, that would be great” and if you can write as well as or better than the average IMDb reviewer please consider whether you have the time and energy to make it work.  We will provide the platform and welcome you, cost-free, among our number.  If you can’t commit to running the thing but would relish reviewing the movies, then that again would be a fine and, obviously, necessary way to help. 

The Contact button is right there under the header bar.

In closing, the radio facility has been a bigger build than anticipated.  We are in the “any day” phase.  There are interviewees lined up, of whom the least interesting and talented will certainly be the first.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, January 2, 2007 at 06:50 PM in Activism
Comments (2) | Tell-a-Friend

Googling Ziv

I just did a spot of that, and came up with this - at no.4 in a list of 159,000:-

MajorityRights.com: A site for the discussion of issues affecting ...
Alon Ziv has to be insane if he believes that the broad-nosed and masculine mixed-race woman looks better. The average American white woman, shown above and ...
majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/C45/ - 60k - 20 Nov 2006 - Cached - Similar pages

“Insane” ... “broad-nosed and masculine mixed-race women” ...  You see, you can get your POV out there.  AND nullify the outrageous racism of our opponents.

Apologies, btw, to the two Alon Zivs above us who are, respectively, in the geology and computer science fields.  No apologies, obviously, to the man who encourages us to bed a Bantu.

Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, November 22, 2006 at 04:15 PM in Activism
Comments (9) | Tell-a-Friend

Dateline never: Tancredo meets with Euro-American leaders on Hispanic threat to south-west

By Sam Ross, Houston Chronicle Correspondent

In a meeting last week in Denver, one of a series of meetings on planning the future of the Euro-American people, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo took part.

Tancredo had accepted an invitation from the Euro-American Policy Planning Institute to be one of a group of leaders tasked with setting strategic goals for improving the situation of the Euro-American people.  Last week’s discussion centered on the Hispanic threat to the south-west.

Participants agreed that one serious problem generated by La Raza leadership’s comments and Mexico’s ability to ignore Euro-American pressure and continue its migrant program is the resurrection of a debate within the Hispanic world and in liberal America about the very existence of Euro-Americans in the south-west.

In the early 2000s, it seemed that La Raza had made peace with the Euro-Americans of the south-west, even if not all Hispanic radicals agreed with that.  But now, the idea of a south-west without Euro-Americans seems to have been rekindled.  One participant in the meeting said that Tancredo considers this very dangerous.

The participants also agreed that the broadest possible political coalition must be formed to curb La Raza’s plans.  Among other things, they discussed the idea that black Americans also concerned by La Raza might become allies on this matter.  One participant called the prevailing atmosphere “very serious, even gloomy.”

OK, it’s just a fantasy.  But then we aren’t Jewish.

Kissinger meets with Jewish leaders on Iranian threat to Israel

By Shmuel Rosner, Haaretz Correspondent

In a meeting last week in New York, one of a series of meetings on planning the future of the Jewish people, former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger took part.

Kissinger had accepted an invitation from the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute to be one of a group of leaders tasked with setting strategic goals for improving the situation of the Jewish people. Last week’s discussion centered on the Iranian threat to Israel.

Participants agreed that one serious problem generated by the Iranian leadership’s comments and Tehran’s ability to ignore international pressure and continue its nuclear program is the resurrection of a debate within the Arab world about Israel’s very existence ...

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, November 7, 2006 at 12:28 PM in Activism
Comments (2) | Tell-a-Friend

A march in Russia, Part Two

I posted a while back on the petition raised in support of anti-immigration marchers in Moscow.  The petitioners got their day out, and you can see five pages of pictures here.  There were a lot of police and security people about and, apparently, 500 marchers arrested.  No violence was captured on film by the photographer.

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, November 6, 2006 at 06:12 PM in Activism
Comments (1) | Tell-a-Friend

A march in Russia

I was sent a petition this morning.  It concerns a cross-party anti-illegal immigration march that the authorities may disallow.  Not being a Russian speaker myself, I can’t advise when and where (presumably Moscow) the March is planned to take place.  But it is a repeat of one organised like year, images of which can be seen here.  It is claimed that 5,000 marched peacefully and out of love of Mother Russia.  A website for the March itself can be viewed - and read by Russian speakers - here.

The petition is calling for our signatures to demonstrate support for the marchers, and to help convince those who have the power to ban their protest that the anti-illegal immigration cause is a just and important one.

You can, if you wish, add your signature here.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, October 17, 2006 at 03:41 AM in Activism
Comments (2) | Tell-a-Friend

Challenging the Power of the Jewish Lobby: What Should Be Done?

My thanks to Bo Sears for unearthing this piece by James Petras, published last week at AxisOfLogic.  It lists eighteen ways, no less, to counter the Jewish Lobby, and in its conclusion is pretty upbeat - a novel discovery for some of us - about the prospects for success.

I recommend you to read the article in its entirety.  But here are those 18 points of action:-

Continued...

Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, October 2, 2006 at 06:19 PM in Activism
Comments (29) | Tell-a-Friend

The bloody bits

The following letter was addressed to the head of MediaNews, the corporation that owns the San Jose Mercury News, the monopoly paper for the 10th largest city in the USA.

Bo

Dear Mr. Singleton,

We emailed preliminary objections to you on 9/27/06 about the use of an undocumented and unsubstantiated “bloody bits” anecdote passed off as true in a Richard Cohen column that veered sharply from being opinion into being an assertion of fact, and printed in the San Jose Mercury News on 9/26/06. We have now had an opportunity to read all the reviews, related literature, and the entire 512-page book that contains the single-sourced bloody bits anecdote, The Lost, published in AD 2006.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Monday, October 2, 2006 at 05:44 PM in Activism
Comments (5) | Tell-a-Friend

The Little Lexicon

I don’t know whether this idea will fly but ...

I am interested in building up a list of corrective word and phrase definitions, each of which encapsulates our worldview and might have some utility in combatting the pervasiveness of left-speak.  For example:-

amnesty  a public admission by the US federal government that its immigration laws do not work, and a private admission that they are not meant to
anarcho-capitalism  religion of the capitalist self, attractive to 40 year-old businessmen trying to be hip
anti-discrimination law  destruction of European peoples’ freedoms of association
anti-racism  fanatical hatred of normal Europeans
anti-semite  any European who resists behaviour by Ashkenazic Jews damaging to his people
Ashkenazic Jews  non-semitic tribe of Central Asian origin who comprise 90% of Jewry
assimilation  once proof that any European could find his or her own place in America; assimilationism  the ideology that assimilation is just as possible for non-Europeans
Auschwitz  one-time labour camp, now a temple of perpetual European damnation
Boer genocide  wave of farm murders since the ANC came to power in SA
Canadian anglophones  francophiles
Canadian francophones  anglophobes
civil rights  government-decreed access for blacks to white society, with no corresponding demand for improvements to black behaviour; African-American civil rights movement Anti-white, pro-black agitation of the 50’s and 60’s organised by Jewish political activists until the Black Power Movement could take over
color-blind  blind
conservatism  the political expression of love of self, love of kind, love of country; Conservative Party  right-liberal political group in Britain; social conservatism  understanding of and profound respect for sociobiologically-derived mores and traditions
cognitive dissonance  an anxiety condition common among liberals who encounter, for example, race-realism
cognitive eltism  the idea that Europeans should be displaced and/or replaced by the world’s smartest non-whites because the world’s dummies are a downright disaster
conspiracy theory  smear term for almost any mention of the elephant in the living room
correlation vs. causation  (also “correlation is not causation”) ostrich tactic commonly employed by race-deniers when confronted by Occam’s razor or plain common sense
culture war  the use of homosexual and ethnic minority interests to undo, subvert or otherwise destroy personal and societal norms
democracy  an oligarchy in which the ordinary people think they can elect their leaders
distributism  economic system aiming at the diffusion of property among the populace
diversity  political buzzword for the decivilisation of European societies, often applied to specific localities (opp of “hideously white”)
economism  the belief that only economic and financial ends are really important
egalitarianism  the pretence that poofs, dykes and low-IQ folks are equal to or the same as normal Europeans
equal rights  equal outcomes ... and jam for equality professionals; a mandate for authoritarianism and theft by taxation
european  of Europe or the peoples of Europe
far right  smear term frequently applied to any normal European
fascism  political philosophy peculiar to Italy; fascist  smear term frequently applied to any normal European
freedom  not choice, not an unfettered will, not anything open to the moderation of politics.  Something more.
gay rights  sad wrongs done to our freedoms of speech and association; euphemism for Homosexualist Marxism; the buggering of normalcy
genetic determinism  Orwellian attempt to smear hereditarians with fanaticism by those who are themselves fanatical in their environmental determinism
hate  the idea of or desire for self-determination among European peoples; hate crime legal confirmation of the primacy of minority feelings; hate speech language tending to the survival of European peoples; hate speech law  legalistic attempt to eliminate from public discourse all language tending to the survival of European peoples
holocaust gratuitous Jewish-racial hagiography on an industrial scale
homosexual  (incl. lesbian) human tragedy requiring of the sufferer personal self-restraint in return for public tolerance
illiberal  non-liberal; comment, itself “illiberal”, upon the opinions of a normal person
immigrant  alien aggressing against European economic, land and genetic resources
integration  slow European genocide, and the only genuine alternative to multiculturalism (happily, that’s failed multiculturalism, of course) or repatriation
interculturalism  pathetic attempt to replace failed multiculturalism with chapati-baking lessons for the (remaining) white housewives of Leicester
Iraq  mental condition affecting the Bush dynasty
la-la land  that place under the soil where ostriches and liberals stick their heads
liberal  captive of liberalism; liberalism  the politics of decivilising the West
libertarian  childish right-liberal freedom junkie with an IQ of 120; libertarianism  (second-wave) purest form of liberalism, tending to the atomisation of society into competing sovereign wills and disqualifying the ethnic interest-based presumptions on which racial survival depends
limousine liberal  members of the political class who gush regularly for the poor they hope never to meet
melting pot genocide of the dark ally and the bed pillow
Mark Stein widely-published Canadian journalist and dissembling shill for the “war on terror”
Marxism  the still-beating heart of the left, even after 100,000,000 deaths by collectivism and state terror, and the collapse of all social and economic credibility
Mexico  a country shortly to be found south of MT and west of LA
multiculturalism  failed attempt by the liberal establishment to force unassimilable aliens on Europeans through the recognition of only cultural differences
nation  a people and a land - Blut und Boden, the one inseparable from the other; nationalist  person who comprehends the inseparability of blood and soil
nazi (from Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei; NSDAP) smear term frequently applied to normal Europeans; nazi war crimes  war crimes by nazis
neoconservatives  Jewish ex-trotskyites and fellow travellers who stole the GOP from European-Americans, captured the US Presidency, opened the borders as wide as possible and declared war on Israel’s enemies.
one-man-one-vote  (abbr. OMOV) a method of restraining indigenous and socially conservative interests at the ballot box
paternalism  feminist paranoia about the benign father figure
patriot  person who does not necessarily comprehend the inseparability of blood and soil, but loves the soil anyway
political correctness  self-censorship in imitatio Marxo for the comfort and good of blacks, queers, liberal academics, etc
pornography  extreme expression of secular Jewish individualism
precision bombing  whoops!
psyops  cynical manipulation of public feeling and opinion by an hidden enemy within
racialist  normal person who puts the interests of his or her people first; racial majority  European people who, by their mere existence, obstruct progress towards the goals of liberalism; racial minority  client group of any liberal, assumed to be inherently noble and in need of protection from white racism and privilege; racial prejudice  believing non-whites are racially inferior, since believing them equal is apparently not a prejudgement; racial supremacism scare story told by race-deniers to avoid the normality of racialism; perfectly logical result of Nature’s diversity racist  term of abuse for a normal European person; a conservative winning an argument with a liberal (Thomas Sowell)
repatriation  redemption from the folly and self-destructiveness of post-war immigration policy in the West
sixties  decade of moral self-indulgence, of revolt against the father, of flight into fantasy, of conservative collapse
social engineering  proof that Man is not perfectible
social scientist  professional bigot who researches us solely to reinforce his or her anti-white, anti-male or heterophobic prejudices
state  the institutions of power through which the liberal-left has marched
Steve Sailer  American journalist with extremely sound race-realist credentials but a fatal incapacity or unwillingness to follow the political logic
terrorism  blind hatred in pursuit of political self-justification
taboo-breaking  wet dream of all liberals, providing the alleged taboos are the natural foundations of society ... but shock and horror if the taboos are their own
two-party system  one-party system
unfettered will  being anyone and doing anything your silly head wishes; the execrable understanding of human nature which is the holy of liberal holies, for spaced-out jumpers everywhere: “I can fly, baby ...”
war on terror  popular belief among certain European peoples that Apache attack helicopters in Lashkargah will save them from what Moslems do in bed in Brussels and Bradford
white flight  Orwellian term blaming whites for their own ethnic cleansing
white privilege the allegedly academic theory that the poor outcomes of certain minorities are caused not by their own failings but by the skin colour of Europeans
white separatism  precondition for racial survival in a multiracial state, akin to repatriation in the ancient nations of Europe
white supremacism,  see “racial supremacism”

There are, I suppose, hundreds of words that could be so defined.  Bearing in mind that the object of the definition is to be accurate, concise (or, if not, funny), and fully “awake” you are cordially invited to improve on and add to the little list I have crashed out above.  If sufficient defs eventually build up - and we are not in a hurry - we can post them as a running feature linked from our front-page.  (I should just add that I will be sole editor and adjudicator of suitability, should anyone care to contribute).

Posted by Guessedworker on Sunday, September 24, 2006 at 06:03 PM in Activism
Comments (131) | Tell-a-Friend

The letter VDare won’t print

This essay is my response to VDARE’s publication of a piece by Steve Sailer on Aug. 27, 2006.  VDARE declined to publish this response.

Steve Sailer’s essay, purportedly about an editorial project by the late Samuel Francis, was shallow and misleading. Sailer even saw fit to compare one of the writings to a book about penguins in a heavy-handed way to show witty contempt.

The Red Herring: Who Is White?

After briefly reviewing the Francis editorial project, Sailer abruptly raises the divisive question, “Who Is White?” which torments no one who has a decent sense of self-respect, and as a way to muddy up the overall issue.

And that question in this context on an immigration reform web site should provide the definitive anecdote illustrating the meaning of “red herring” in all dictionaries.  Addressing it as a weighty and oh-so-difficult matter, Sailer pretends to ponder whether Muslims, Iranians, Arabs, Chechens, Turks, Albanians, Greeks, Sicilians, and Jews are white.

Who Is White Answered

But the answer to “Who is white?” is simplicity itself.

White people are those young and old people who are attacked for being white on college campuses, on television news and entertainment programs, in the print media, and on sidewalks and playgrounds. White people have their whiteness defined for them by denunciation.

On the West Coast, media typically list major demographic groups with these labels: “African-American, Asian-American, and white.”  White people are those people given the label that has two negative characteristics: no capital letter and no American status. (Unless the label is “non-Hispanic white” which has three negative characteristics.)

White people are the ones never described as diverse or vibrant or culturally enriching.

White people are told that they have all the power, but who find that they do not have the power to choose their neighbors, their employees, and their children’s schools, or to end the campaign of defamation that flows over their children every day via the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture.

Getting Down And Wrestling

Sailer’s next topic is his claim that “white Americans these days really don’t like getting down and wrestling with the Al Sharptons [sic] of the world for racial spoils.”  But he cites no evidence for this over-wrought claim and, in fact, Al Sharpton is probably the most wrestled with African-American ever. Consider the smackdown administered to him by an Italian-American attorney over the false claims of a kidnapping some years ago.  Sailer typically picked the worst example he could have so far as “getting down and wrestling” is concerned.

Our Friendly-Enemies

Unfortunately, Sailer’s ideological wanderings have yet to come home to a sensible place, and those of us who are conscious of the campaign of defamation against young European Americans need to speak out when needed against our friendly-enemies like Steve Sailer, Mark Steyn, Lawrence Auster, Henry Makow, Israel Shamir, and Eric Margolis.  Their advice, like their friendship, is tainted with strawmen, red herrings, slurs, hate caricatures, misleading historical bits, a supremacist claim to have the right to tell us what our name is and how we should think, unworthy vocabulary tricks, and/or the selection of their enemies for European Americans to hate and fear, too.

Immigration Reform

If friendly-enemies can help in the fight for responsible immigration, let’s welcome them to that fight.  However, the only line in Sailer’s essay that touched on immigration reform was, “Today, Karl Rove swearing allegiance in person to the immigration goals of the National Council of La Raza is considered somewhere between unobjectionable and admirable.”

That’s not enough to justify Sailer’s long-winded and mendacious attempt on an immigration reform web-site to describe and define whites, much less to prescribe how European Americans should think and feel about themselves.

Bo Sears
ResistingDefamation.org

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, August 30, 2006 at 11:56 AM in Activism
Comments (25) | Tell-a-Friend

More mercurial pursuits

This opinion piece by Zef Chavets - titled “Anti-Semitic comments aren’t kosher, Mr. Gibson” - first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.  But yesterday it was syndicated by our good friends at the San Jose Mercury News.  It contained the word, “goyish”, which places it well within range of the RD artillery …

TO: George Riggs, Publisher, San Jose Mercury News (MediaNews Group)

TO: Stephen E. Wright, Editorial Page Editor, San Jose Mercury News (MediaNews Group)

ON: August 4, 2006

RE: Editorial Page Essay (Page 14A) by Zev Chafets (Written for Los Angeles Times)

We strongly protest your endorsement of a derivative of “goy” in the Chafets essay today. The words “goy,” “goyish,” and “goyim” represent such a packet of hatred that we feel it necessary to object loudly and clearly to Chafets’ effort to name us with this ugly and divisive label.

Chafets used the ugly “goyish” term in this sentence:

“But after the film [“The Passion”] grossed more than $600 million, these execs raised Gibson on their shoulders and began optioning every goyish property from Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians to the Anglican Book of Common Prayer.” More than a little anti-Christian bigotry lurks in that sentence, but our concern is with “goyish.”

[And what an odd slur to publish on the Friday after the Wednesday when the San Jose Mercury News officially passed to the MediaNews of Denver. Are we going to have a new flood of bigotry and divisiveness under MediaNews?]

Chafets’ claim to name the rest of us in the world is obviously based on a claim to supremacy—after all, what is the claim to have the right to name the other than a claim based on supremacy? Members of all races and religions appear to have sought to impose their name for the other on the other, but it is astounding to see the San Jose Mercury News, on its second day under new ownership, privilege Chafets’ dream of lording it over others by naming them as he chooses.

It shouldn’t be news to the publisher and editorial page editor of the San Jose Mercury News that this kind of labeling is the ultimate in divisive talk—Chafets just divides the world into two chunks of humanity, and names the one he is not a member of!

And it shouldn’t be news to the publisher and editorial page editor of the San Jose Mercury News that it is the members of any group under discussion that have the unlimited right and privilege to name themselves. What part of “Our Names, Ourselves” don’t you understand?

The most remarkable thing about the evil triplets (goy, goyish, goyim) is that the use of these terms serves to suppress the diversity of every other group in the world except for the group with which Chafets identifies. This is a kind of ultimate arrogance that surprised us to see the San Jose Mercury News endorse by publishing Chafets’ piece.

While “goyish” is divisive, supremacy-driven, and anti-diversity, we do not claim it is offensive. We are not concerned about our feelings in this matter, only that the mean-spiritedness of Chafets (and his publishers) should be laid bare.

The Ninth Circuit spoke out on the “goy” word in Baballah v. Ashcroft, decided 7/11/03.

Here is part of what the court said in its decision about Baballah’s treatment in Israel, before granting him asylum in the USA.

Referring to treatment by employers, “Although Baballah had studied to be an accountant, bank official refused to hire him when they discovered his background. These officials told him that he would ‘follow in [his] father’s footsteps’ and called him a ‘goy’...and [he was] turned away.”

The San Francisco Chronicle published an excellent article (7/12/03) on this decision which also discusses “goy.”

Kindly cease and desist the pattern and practice of endorsing divisive, supremacy-driven, and anti-diversity labels for us on your editorial page and throughout your paper. Kindly update your “style book” to enforce the cultural and social rule that only members of groups get to name their own groups. Remember, “Our Names, Ourselves.”

Bo Sears
ResistingDefamation.org

Posted by Guest Blogger on Saturday, August 5, 2006 at 01:31 AM in Activism
Comments (6) | Tell-a-Friend

A letter to Steve

Steve Sailer’s latest article in The American Conservative was, as usual, replete with exactly the kind of language we want to see eliminated from public discourse.  So we decided to write to the Great Man and let him know none too gently where he is falling down on the job ...

Steve Sailer,

The reason we think you are a phony in almost everything you write is because of sentences like this one:-

Because the median voter is in his late forties, non-Hispanic whites cast 79 percent of the votes in 2004, according to the Census Bureau, even though they comprise only 68 percent of the total population and just 57 percent of those under age five.

You have to know that calling us “non-Hispanic whites” is a symptom of hostility to the majority of USA voters.  So why are you using a hateful vocabulary that smothers our diversity and reeks of contempt to describe us in the context of an article that seems to argue that Democrats should give some respect to us?  You are really part of that great hate-filled attack on Americans of European origins.  Most people don’t get it, but we see it clearly in your vocabulary and in your arguments.

And we see you like the hate term “gentile” as used in this sentence:-

In the past, it would have been unthinkable for a far Left organization to get a higher proportion of gentile than Jewish support, but the times they are a-changin’.

I don’t know who you think you are fooling, but “gentile” is a name imposed on us.  Many of us reject it out of hand as contemptuous and certainly as part of an effort to smother our diversity in public discourse.  Where do you get the right to slap us with “gentile”?

We’ll leave aside your cheap reliance on the bizarre red-blue state fantasy, but we reject your use of that left-wing, media caricature as unworthy of any thinking person.

Shame on you.

Stanley Womack
ResistingDefamation.org

Posted by Guest Blogger on Saturday, July 22, 2006 at 06:24 PM in Activism
Comments (57) | Tell-a-Friend

Where is our own fully-funded anti-defamation organization?

There seems to be serious resistance to using a combative approach to name-calling against our young children along the lines of Abe Foxman and his crew at ADL.  But ADL, ACLU, PAW, and SPLC specialize on a daily basis in a revolting brand of hate speech that has to have a serious negative impact on us and, more to the point, on our young children.

We began Resisting Defamation in 1990, and took its Syllabus on-line a few years later, but intelligent European Americans have not embraced the cause.  We’re not pleading that our version is the only possible version, but where else on the Internet is there a site that attacks back against editors, columnists, and writers who engage in the most repellent smear attacks on us and our children?  We need ten, one hundred, one thousand web-sites bashing back.

I mention intelligent European Americans because IQ tests are more-or-less normed to our continent-of-origin, so there is a possibility that fully one-half of us literally do not understand the need to speak up.  And probably a huge share of those with above average intelligence find it embarrassing, shameful, too costly, or beneath them to speak up.  Why should this be so?

In our local experience, we have materially stung white-bashers, changed behavior, and gotten people who smear us fired from jobs. Just like ADL.  But where are the writers and thinkers who will resist defamation across the North American, Australian, and European continents?

And with our “theory of slurs,” there is no need to whine, discuss your feelings, or claim hurt. Our approach looks at labels as to whether (1) they are contemptuous, (2) they are based on a supremacist claim, or (3) they act to smother our Euro-diversities, histories, heritages, and cultures.  Still, the larger minds among our kin find the concept of speaking out to be beneath them.

It seems that common sense, a ready-made vocabulary, and proven techniques aren’t persuasive to our natural leaders, so I will appeal to authority to get some action.

I imagine we are all aware of the remarkable work of Wilmot Robertson, and the authority and prestige carried by his name and writings.  So let’s take a look at what he said about this phenomenon of silence toward hate speech.

In his book, “The Dispossessed Majority,” first published in 1981, twenty-five years ago, and in his Chapter Ten, “The Decline of the Majority,” he says:

“There are aggressively censorious minority organizations, principal among them the B’nai B’rith’s Anti-Defamation League, which monitor the printed and the spoken word for the most subtle anti-minority allusions. Should any be found, the owner or editor of the offending media and, if necessary, the writer, advertisers and stockholders are so advised and admonished… The Majority, to its great loss, has no similar watchdog organizations.”

Think of that and then think of all the ink spilled, all the electronics hurled through the ether, and all the writing about high-minded theories, but only one anti-defamation Internet-based group is in existence for all of Euro-diversity.  Why the reluctance to tangle with the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture to protect our children?  I’d really like to hear from posters as to why they decline to take Wilmot Robertson’s advice to form “watchdog organizations” especially to secure our Majority Rights.

Stanley Womack

ResistingDefamation.org

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, July 19, 2006 at 04:58 AM in Activism
Comments (2) | Tell-a-Friend

Victim support

I have been asked to provide the current prison contact address for Kevin Hughes.  Readers will know that he is the BNP member handed down a two and a half year custodial sentence for an argument in the street with an Iraqi asylum seeker.  No one was hurt.  But the judge at Worcester Crown Court saw his anti-racist duty clearly.

Kevin is a man of good character, a family man, a charitable worker and, of course, a loyal Englishman.  He is, it seems, finding that the long prison day goes by extremely slowly, and yet he has been denied newspapers and books by the authorities.

He is allowed to receive mail.  I am sure that not just fellow BNP members have written to him offering their support, but good people all around the world who know a judicial wrong when they see one.  Any MR reader who wishes to remind Kevin that he has not been forgotten may do so by writing here:-

Kevin Hughes
XB4290
HMP Featherstone
New Road
Featherstone
Wolverhampton
WV10 7PU

For correspondents within the UK a stamped-addressed envelope would be much appreciated, so he can reply.

Kevin now has his appeal papers drawn up.  There is good hope that his clearly inappropriate sentence will be reduced.  But his criminal record will, sadly, never be expunged.

Posted by Guessedworker on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 at 04:12 AM in Activism
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend

“Anglo” Is The Correct Label For Polish-Americans! - UPDATED, 10th July

Rebuking newspaper editors for various slurs is a valuable effort because it does make them confront their bias. Here is our response to the Publisher and the Editorial Page Editor of the San Jose Mercury News when they validated an op-ed piece labeling us with the Spanish-language term “Anglo.” This is offered to Majority Rights posters as a possible sample for such rebukes.

Note there is no crying game, no claim of hurt feelings. No passive-aggressive stuff here. No begging, no weeping. But it will have an impact over time because the argument will always appear on the Internet when the editors’ names are searched.

And rebuking the media masters about their hate speech is better than chattering about it among ourselves.

Stan

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Friday, July 7, 2006 at 07:17 PM in Activism
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend

To amuse and appal you

This is to provide an example of the educational work we do among the most hardened of white-haters and Christian-haters. We rarely preach to those who understand the need for majority rights. We take our message most often to those who need instruction.

Be warned that this one falls into the XXX category.

Members of Resisting Defamation range near and far in selecting opportunities for educating persons about slurs and negative stereotypes. We heard about one New Yorker web master of specialized sexual proclivities who persisted in spitting and hissing at “European whites” as uniquely responsible for the rise of “scientific racism” in world history. Supposedly all race ideas originated in Europe in the 1700s and 1800s. So we checked him out.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Wednesday, July 5, 2006 at 07:27 PM in Activism
Comments (3) | Tell-a-Friend

What’s In A Name?

Majorityites have long been lax in identifying ourselves. One reason is that those older than 50 were raised in the USA to call ourselves “American” which usually, believe it or not, was not a term viewed as race-based. Somehow in the 1970s, the term “American” became synonymous with bigotry, racism, and oppression in the hands of the dominant media culture and the corporate entertainment culture.

There are “American” holdouts, but public discourse requires a new naming process. It may seem a small matter, but there are very few attributes that more clearly point out who we are, what we want, and our sense of self-respect than our name.

Somehow we have allowed ourselves to be defined by minorityites in media discussions (at least in California) as, for example:

We’re “whites” when the topic is African Americans.

We’re “gentiles” when the topic is Jewish Americans.

We’re “Caucasians” when the topic is Asian Americans.

We’re “Anglos” when the topic is Latin Americans.

And we are never “Americans” or allowed to use the suffix “-Americans.”

Of course we have the right and duty to name ourselves without reference to any other group. That is, our identity does not depend on its relationship with the identity of anyone else.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Tuesday, July 4, 2006 at 02:47 AM in Activism
Comments (28) | Tell-a-Friend

What is to be done?

The question of Majority Rights is a question about ways and means to regain the rights we have lost. To that extent, instead of allowing Jewish, Arabic, and African Rights & Feelings to hypnotize our higher centers of rational thought, or to find a label for us like Conservatives, Patriots, Whites, Libertarians, Neo-conservatives, Nationalists, Separatists, Supremacists, anti-Semites, and so on, it behooves us to ask what is to be done.

There are many things that majorityites can do. Here are some.

Continued...

Posted by Guest Blogger on Saturday, July 1, 2006 at 03:36 AM in Activism
Comments (21) | Tell-a-Friend

Why there will be war with Iran (and Syria, etc, etc.)

(Same caveat as below)

I am not a big fan of war, in the same way that most anybody normal (i.e. not Bush) isn’t. It involves casualties; it disrupts the orderly progress of day to day life; and it is also hugely expensive. Of course, it is occasionally necessary to defend yourselves against aggressors, but the threat of Sierra Leone (a tiny African basket case, which Blair decided to invade, god alone knows why, nine years ago) and Iraq to Britain can, not to put too fine a point on it, be overestimated. So, it is fair enough to say that I am anti-war in the current context.

Continued...

Posted by Alex Zeka on Tuesday, March 28, 2006 at 06:01 PM in Activism,  Liberalism & the Left,  War on Terror
Comments (4) | Tell-a-Friend