GW has expressed the constraint:
“It is a pity that Christianity, as flawed as it is from a European racial perspective, is undeniably part of the unity of north and south. We are stuck with it, for it has been too close for too long to us - and the faithful must have their faith expressions, after all.”
DanielS has expressed the constraint:
“Adding yet another knot in the tangle is the argument that with the Christian texts already being the terms in which many of our people think, the currency for two thousand years now, there must be some ontological basis beneath, and we may as well find the positive logic to it for our purposes. However, with the texts being what they are, the motivations of the texts being as convoluted, Jewish and ambiguous as they were to begin, all that winds-up happening with the deciphering of our “true” logic behind Christianity is a contribution to the mess.”
An approach offered by John Harland is to admit the historicity of Jesus in His essential mythic image as descendant of God evidenced in his own over-ruling of texts with direct bodily connection with God as Father, but to deny the historicity of the extant texts—deny them as yet another means by which dastards attempt to interpose themselves between the God-heritage of individuals and their Father, in spirit and flesh.
Ridicule of Harland’s own editing of the texts to suit his view may be conducted only at the sacrifice of the two constraints establishing the context of this presentation. Offer a superior approach if you don’t like Harland’s—either that or declare folly the entire effort to connect with the spiritual force of Christianity.
Click this link for a pdf document containing part of Harland’s account starting with “The Germans” (in the anthropological sense meaning what many identify as Celtic and Nordic pagans of the pre-Christian era), “The Catholic Church Promotes Judeo-Christianity”, “The First Breaking Apart of the Church Serpent” (regarding Henry VIII and Martin Luther), “A Further Break From the Serpent” (regarding the establishment of America), “The Strange Phenomenon of ‘Money-Mad’ Americans” (regarding the closing of the frontier and replacement of Nature and Nature’s God with money-based “culture”), “The American Dream” (the commodification, by conspirators, of the American spiritual renaissance), “The German Reich” (the parallel processes occurring in what became the nation state known as “Germany” during the 1800s leading up to WW I), “The World Picture After WW I” (the situation leading up to WW II) and the concluding section of this pdf document is “The Second World War”.
The entire book is “Word Controlled Humans” by John Harland, ISBN 0-914752-12-X available from Sovereign Press, 326 Harris Road, Rochester, WA 98579 (with which I have no business or personal relationship).
Posted by James Bowery on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 at 08:37 PM in Anthropology, Archeology, Books, Christianity, Conservatism, European culture, History, National Socialism, Political Philosophy, Psychology, Revisionism, Social Sciences, The Ontology Project, U.S. Politics
Comments (257) |
ZionCrimeFactory, one of the people behind the
prothink network I recently promoted, has taken issue with the claim that
international bankers funded Hitler and the NSDAP into power. He said:
As far as Hitler being funded by Jews is concerned, this is not the case.
Anthony Sutton’s allegations rests in part on a fraudulent book called
Hitler’s Secret Bankers by the mysterious entity calling itself Sidney
Warburg. Michael Collins Piper mentions this fraud in his commentary on these
false theories concerning the funding of Hitler.
Anthony Sutton was a Jewish agent who, in his other book about Wall Street
and the Bolshevik Revolution, denied that Jews and Jewish bankers were behind
Bolshevism and the communist seizure of power in Russia, calling it a
You write: “In contrast, zioncrimefactory cited Niall Ferguson against
the contention that Jewish bankers funded the NSDAP in spite of acknowledging
that Ferguson was commissioned by the Rothschilds to lie about their
No I cited a portion of text from Niall Ferguson’s Rothschild book to
demonstrate the absurdity of the claim that Hitler was an agent of the
Rothschild family by showing how Hitler seized the palaces and assets of
three branches of the House of Rothschild in Germany, France and Austria, and
sent members of this family into exile before and during WW2. This fact is
corroborated by other sources as well and is not disputed, other than by
ignoramuses on the internet who dismiss anything that doesn’t fit with the
nonsense theory that Hitler was a Rothschild descendant or Rothschild agent,
a theory that originated with anti-Nazi propagandists in the Jew-run OSS.
A lot of these myths about the founding and funding of the NSDAP are laid
to rest in this article by Veronica Clark:
Let’s look at the matter.
Posted by R-news on Wednesday, July 11, 2012 at 11:10 PM in Economics & Finance, Marxism & Culture War, National Socialism, Political analysis, Revisionism, That Question Again, World Affairs
Comments (13) |
Stalingrad: A Movie to Rent
Robert E. Reis
John-JacquesAnnaud released his movie Stalingrad in 2001 and created a scandal in France. (It was released in the United States as Enemy at the Gates.)
It is easy to meet Communists, Socialists, Stalinists, Maoists, Castroites,. In Paris. Stalingrad is the name of a large Metro station in the city. The Communist Party headquarters is located at the Place Colonel Fabien – named after the French Communists leader who told his resistance forces that Paris was worth 200,000 dead.
Annaud spent enormous sums recreating a facsimile of Stalingrad. He included a famous fountain surrounded by happy children in gold. He also built monstrous statues of Stalin that poor Saddam Hussein may have used as an inspiration for the famous statue recently pulled down in Baghdad before the eyes of an enthusiastic crowd of six.
Posted by Robert Reis on Friday, August 31, 2007 at 05:47 AM in Revisionism
Comments (17) |
Italy approves law making Holocaust denial a crime
Italy’s government Thursday approved a bill that makes denying the Holocaust a crime and stiffens prison sentences for those found guilty of inciting racial hatred.
Ministry officials said those found guilty of spreading ideas about a race being superior to another would now risk up to three years in prison while acts designed to incite racial, ethnic, religious or sexual violence would be punishable with a maximum four- year prison sentence.
Here’s the interesting part:
Initially conceived to target Holocaust deniers, the bill was broadened to include all forms of intolerance after some members of Prodi’s centre-left coalition had expressed reservations about the appropriateness of using the criminal code to honour the millions of Jews killed in the Shoah.
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, January 26, 2007 at 08:45 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism
Comments (6) |
...of countries that criminalize heresy:
Editors Fined For Printing Anti-Semitic Letter
Two newspaper editors were fined for publishing a letter that said violence against Jews was justified and that the Holocaust was acceptable.
State Prosecutor Mika Illman said Uusimaa, a regional newspaper, and the Kansan Uutisetpaper broke the law in July by publishing the letter by Usko Takkumaki, which criticized Jews and Israel.
The WaPo and Israel Today carried the story as well.
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Saturday, January 13, 2007 at 06:15 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism
Germany wants EU-wide law against denying the Holocaust
BERLIN - Germany wants to make denying the Holocaust punishable by law in every member state of the European Union during its current presidency of the bloc, Brigitte Zypries, the Justice Minister, said yesterday. “Denial of the Holocaust is an example of what would be punishable by law if standardization took place,” she said at a press conference to present the German government’s program on justice matters for the next six months. Previous attempts to unify legal standards for Holocaust denial and other xenophobic attacks were blocked by Italy, but the new Italian government of Prime Minister Romano Prodi has dropped its opposition, Ms. Zypries said. Among EU members, there are laws against denying the slaughter of six million Jews by the Nazis during the Second World War in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany and Spain. In a recent high-profile case, controversial British historian David Irving spent 13 months in jail in Austria for challenging the Holocaust before being released on probation last month. Germany took over the rotating six-month presidency of the 27-country EU on Jan. 1.
So it’s news in Canada.
It’s news in the international non-Arab Semite Anglophone press:
Germany aims for E.U. ban on Holocaust denial
German politicians are pushing for a ban on Nazi symbols and Holocaust denial throughout the European Union.
Holocaust denial is illegal in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany and Spain.
Germany wants Holocaust denial to be EU-wide crime
That seems to be the source of the article at Canada.com.
It’s news to lawyers:
Germany to push for EU law criminalizing Holocaust denial
It’s not news to Americans.
Points of interest:
The holocaust was all about non-Arab Semites. The rest who died (usually anonymously included in an 11 million figure, if at all) are shit.
The proposed law is all about the non-Arab Semite holocaust. The myriad other racial sensitivities the world over are shit.
It seems okay to tell Canadians (used to draconian suppression of free speech), non-Arab Semites (in favor of and benefiting from draconian suppression of free speech), and lawyers (in the business of draconian suppression of free speech) about the desire to expand across the EU the suppression of free speech, but not Americans (none too fond of any kind of suppression of free speech). They don’t need to know about such things. They might get the wrong ideas.
Race-realism has predictive power: I predict not a peep from the American freedom lobby about this.
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, January 10, 2007 at 04:46 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism
Should UK Ban Shoah Denial?
Britain should hold a debate on whether to introduce a law banning Holocaust denial, a senior government minister said this week.
Police and Security Minister Tony McNulty, was speaking exclusively to the Jewish News less than two weeks after Holocaust denier David Irving arrived back in Britain after serving 13 months in an Austrian jail.
As far as I can tell, this story is indeed a Totally Jewish exclusive; Google News shows no other results (“Tony McNulty” holocaust). It isn’t too hard to suss out who Tony’s pandering to.
Lord Janner, Chairman of the Holocaust Educational Trust, welcomed McNulty’s views. He said such legislation would be “great”. However he was pessimistic over the chances of such a law being introduced. “Holocaust denial is worse than libel, but it won’t happen. The chances of getting it in the UK are nil.”
At least libel laws are subject to defense, wherein the defendant can prove himself innocent by proving the truth of what he said. With Holocaust laws the only truth that matters is that heresy has been committed.
McNulty added: “The MCB is wrong to boycott Holocaust Memorial Day, whatever they feel about other events in history, it misses the point. For all the other atrocities in history, the Holocaust was so mechanised, so formal in a way we have not seen before and happily not since.”
Translation: THE HOLOCAUST is special because non-Arab Semites are special; the 20+ millions (mostly Christian) killed by the Soviets (wildly disproportionately non-Arab Semite) aren’t special.
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Thursday, January 4, 2007 at 04:34 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism
Comments (31) |
I cross-posed with Svi. But here is the (almost) straight story from The Times:-
David Irving, the historian jailed for three years in Austria for denying the Holocaust, is free after a court reduced his prison sentence on appeal.
Irving, who was sentenced in February, was released after Vienna’s highest court ruled today that he should serve one year in prison and the remainder of his sentence on probation.
After already serving 13 months behind bars since his arrest in November 2005, Irving had his handcuffs removed today in a small courtroom crowded with his supporters and members of the local press.
“He is free, and he can leave, and he will leave,” said Herbert Schaller, his lawyer, adding that he would advise the historian to leave Austrian soil as soon as possible.
Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 at 07:28 PM in Revisionism
Comments (2) |
The Austrian government has magnanimously released convicted (and confessed) heretic David Irving.
Or at least, that’s the impression I get. In between telling us the sentences Austria metes out to heretics for their heresy, how evil Austria is for producing Nazis, the right-leanings of the judge who’s cut his sentence short, etc., the non-Arab Semite mouthpiece has overlooked telling us when he’ll be released, or even if his release has been ordered.
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 at 07:21 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism
Comments (0) |
After the cartoons came the Conference:-
According to the foreign ministry in Tehran, 67 researchers from 30 countries are attending the conference in Iran, which is home to 25,000 Jews.
Participants include a number of well-known “revisionist” Western academics. American David Duke, a former leader of the Ku Klux Klan, is to present a paper.
Well, I suppose it was a tough call. Grab the chance to shake hands with Nejad’s funny boys and pontificate in front of the world’s press ... or pass up the one international platform revisionists have been given in sixty years. Maybe the 67 figured (probably wrongly) they had nothing to lose. Maybe they followed the old rogue’s dictum: Publicity, bad. No such thing as. Maybe they lacked the integrity of the man brought in chains to Mannheim District Court last Wednesday, the translation of whose grave testimony that day is now circulating on the web. Here it is (PDF).
Tehran you can forget.
Posted by Guessedworker on Monday, December 11, 2006 at 07:00 PM in Revisionism
Comments (6) |
Historical revisionist forums have been carrying Günter Deckert’s reportage of the Germar Rudolf trial in Mannheim District Court, meaning at this stage the opening statement from Germar himself. There was a further day of evidence today which, no doubt, will find its way around the internet very shortly. But at present the Day Three, December 4th reportage is the most recent available.
Germar is impressive, an intellectual of substance and a man of obvious integrity. That won’t save him. The nature of his patriotism needs must call forth persecution from the State.
At least let us be aware of the qualities of the man and the manner in which he deploys his argument. Here is Deckert’s Day Three court report.
Posted by Guessedworker on Wednesday, December 6, 2006 at 07:46 PM in Revisionism
Comments (2) |
Belgian Authorities Destroy Holocaust Records
The Belgian authorities have destroyed archives and records relating to the persecution and deportation of Jews in Belgium in the 1930s and 1940s. Some of this happened as recently as the late 1990s. This was revealed during hearings in the Belgian Senate last Spring. Though the Senate report dates from 4 May the Belgian press has not yet mentioned the affair. The Senate report says that “documents about the period 1930-1950 have been destroyed on a massive scale.”
The systematic destructions of the records of police and judiciary from the 1930s and ’40s happened chiefly in Brussels and Wallonia, the French-speaking south of Belgium. The Senate report states that in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking north of the country, archives have been saved thanks to conscientious archivists. “This policy – of having competent archivists manage dead archives – contrasts with the disastrous situation at the offices of the public prosecutors in Brussels and Wallonia.”
While the records about the persecution of the Antwerp Jewry have been kept intact, documents about the fate of the Jews in Brussels and in French-speaking cities with large pre-war Jewish communities, such as Charleroi and Liège, were purposely destroyed. In Charleroi all the archives relating to the 1930s and the war years have vanished. In Brussels the judicial archives are present “until the early 1930s, while there is (almost) nothing left of the period thereafter,” the report says, adding that “Reference is often made to the 1944 fire of the Palais de Justice to explain this lack of archives [...] However, there is no doubt that large parts of the Brussels judicial wartime archives were destroyed after 1944.”
I wonder if the ever-hyper-watchful jewish community has raised, or will ever raise, a stink about this. Cui bono?
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, September 1, 2006 at 10:04 PM in Revisionism
Comments (5) |
Holland moves to ban Holocaust denial
When a Dutch family comes back to Holland after eight years of living in Israel, people tend to assume its members are Jewish.
So says Leon Meijer, and he should know. Meijer, who completed his doctorate at the Technion, learned that lesson the hard way when his 11-year-old daughter was told by a classmate soon after her return: “It’s a pity Hitler didn’t finish the job.”
Meijer was shocked not only by the comment, but by the discovery that the Netherlands has no laws clearly outlawing Holocaust denial.
I’m shocked, shocked as well! It’s (not) odd that this is (shocking!) news in the jewish press (for jews), but not in the jewish press (for goyim).
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 at 06:29 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism
Comments (5) |
Holocaust denier draws 160,000 votes
Democrats call AG candidate’s strong showing ‘embarrassing’
MONTGOMERY - Larry Darby believes that Jews exaggerated the Holocaust, that the country should be all-white and that illegal immigrants should be shot on sight.
In Madison County, Darby received more votes Tuesday than his opponent for attorney general in the Democratic primary, Mobile County District Attorney John Tyson Jr.
Huntsville wasn’t alone. Darby received more votes statewide than former Chief Justice Roy Moore did in the Republican primary for governor.
Darby, a Montgomery lawyer, had 52 percent of the county’s votes to Tyson’s 48 percent, though Tyson won the Democratic primary. In fact, Huntsville was the only major metropolitan area that voted for Darby. And he got more votes in Madison County, the third-largest county in Alabama, than former Gov. Don Siegelman, who was running in the Democratic gubernatorial primary.
State Rep. Randy Hinshaw, D-Meridianville, calls the Darby vote totals “embarrassing.”
160,000 voters unfazed by Darby’s extreme views
Posted by Svyatoslav Igorevich on Friday, June 9, 2006 at 04:25 PM in Free Speech, Revisionism, U.S. Politics
Comments (13) |