In response to Jewish troll JamesUK on February 05, 2015
I was blocked from submitting an article on the obvious phenomenon of “mulatto supremacism” - which even has notable historical precedent in Haiti’s mulatto supremacist genocide of Whites on the island.
Wikipedia is censored to protect Jewish interests.
Proof of their influence on Wikipedia is to be found in videos which reveal Israeli boiler rooms - groups of people put up to spin wiki articles in a jewish way.
I don’t now what Wikipedia’s policy is on creating entries on its site so I can’t comment on that it.
I heard of Jewish commentators on YouTube like to Israel but not Wikipedia.
Where are the videos?
It is so basically factual to anyone who has had dealings with Wikipedia and White activism that I don’t even feel obligated to make the case as a public service; I will leave you to further secretarial detail rather than getting caught up in your game of arguing over the obvious. Instead, I will provide just this one video example which you act as if difficult to find - a ready example of Jewish manipulation of Wikipedia:
Yesha Council in conjunction with “My Israel” has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As way of example, if someone searches “the Gaza Flotilla” we want to be there, we want to be the guys who influence what is written there, how its written and to ensure that its ‘balanced’ and Zionist in nature.
In defense of Edgar Steele’s position in, “In defense of anti-Semitism” (excerpted at the bottom of the post), I said:
The i.q. factor has been adjusted for, to show that Jews are vastly overrepresented due to nepotism and other corrupt means.
JamesUK said in response:
I seriously doubt that seeing how the same pattern can be seen in other countries where they have less influence in state positions like in Russia.
Your serious doubt is wrong.
I don’t think so.
Well, you are wrong and not worth arguing with.
Seeing how it is an opinion either way there is not much to discuss.
Well that’s it. You want to bring into question the obvious. That may show a dull chutzpah but it is only a tedious obstruction as it will not yield significantly new information - there is no scarcity of evidence to the contrary of your position.
But of necessity, I will offer this perfunctory summation: After factors of i.q. are taken into account, matters of Jewish nepotism, hyper-ethnocentrism, incommensurate ways of life and moral standards which do disservice to European interests and ways, Jewish coercion, bullying, bribery, brainwashing all have to be taken into account for what they should not be able to do at any rate - head European nations and peoples (which includes Russians), irrespective of the high i.q. of some Jews.
Regarding Duke and Black, we are not here to defend them, they can defend themselves. We are here to defend Whites and White patterns that need defending.
I don’t but they do run on an openly white political agenda and are members of openly pro-white organisations for decades.
They are the most high profile leaders of the WN movement in the US so they are the political representation of what WN believe in the US.
Other WN’s include Pierce and associates who are a mix of terrorists, mass shooters, a would be wife killer and a paedophile.
You don’t get to say who is represented by Duke and Black. They represent themselves, or anybody who wants to be represented by them, which is not in all ways us.
They are not the only ones who care about European people and not comprehensively representative.
Steele was not a would-be wife killer. That was a set-up.
Facts say otherwise hence his conviction.
On the contrary. These are the facts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1NG07kU8to Facts say that he was set up. A handyman (Larry Fairfax) that Steele hired to help around his property was a federal informant hired to set him up on the charge of murder for hire of his wife for her insurance. His wife, Cindy, didn’t have insurance. An audio- tape was fabricated to allege his having solicited the hit on Cindy for her insurance money. Audio experts were blocked by the (corrupt) judge from testifying as such.
What motive was there for Steele to kill his wife for non-existent insurance money? On the other hand, if you listen to, or read, Steele’s, “In defense of anti semitism” (an excerpt from the text is provided below, though the link to the site where the audio and text were is no longer available - I wonder why?), there was plenty of motive for Jewish interests to silence Steele.
What a jew you are
Not Jewish but it is like Blacks complaining about racism with problems in there own community.
You are doing the bidding of Jews at any rate. You say WN are “complaining”, as if its trivial. But we are not “like blacks complaining about racism” around here. At MR we survey all concerns - centering on our own human ecological systems first and attending to problems and antagonists as they emerge relevant. Jews happen to be salient among antagonists in their genetic pattern and in 7 power points: finance, politics, law, religion, business, academia, media.
WN aren’t “complaining” ab. immigration and jews, we’re noting blockage to our sovereignty, destruction of our well being, deliberately imposed threat to our survival.
Apart from the US other western countries especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival of the host countries that as I said before most are economic migrants from new EU countries.
“Apart from the US and other western countries” .... a ‘little thing’ like The US and Western nations being destroyed. We’re supposed to shrug that off, right?
“especially Eastern Europe do not have significant immigration to come anywhere near close to threatening the actual survival”
Even if we were so crass, indignant, egregious as to not care about western European nations, and if the western countries were to go under, then eventually the eastern countries would be submerged in spill-over tides of non-Whites as well. You know it.
most are economic migrants from new EU countries.
You want Europeans to fight each other, like good right-wingers, don’t you?
Is that why you want to crash us together antagonistically with your EU? Perhaps you think Americans should vote for Republican neo cons and your Jewish war complex?
That conference was too right-wing reactionary and probably played into the hands of how Jews would like us to be - the Gottfrieds, the Atzmons, the Dugins, the Jared Taylors, the scary scientistic factualizers to turn-off normal people.
Excerpt from Edgar Steele’s “In defense of anti-Semitism”
Note: JamesUK cited I.Q. statistics for Jewish success, which have been factored into equations of proportional representation in The Ivy league and professions, revealing that Jews are vastly overrepresented by dint of nepotism, political and religious propaganda, financial and legal manipulation.
Beneath Every Rock
Supposedly, Jews account for 2-1/2 per cent of the American population. Why, then, is half the student body at Harvard and most every Ivy League college Jewish? Statistics simply are not kept as to the percentage of Jews in this profession or that, but when was the last time you saw a doctor whose name did not end in “berg,” “man” or “stein?” I’m not sure I have ever met a psychiatrist who wasn’t Jewish. On the other hand, have you ever seen a Jewish farmer or mechanic?
Rarely do I appear in court, but the guy on the other side of the courtroom - and often as not, the judge, too - is Jewish. And, it is incredible the deference paid by the bench to the Jewish DA, or whoever, sitting at the other counsel table. There has been more than one trial where I could have merely phoned in my participation, for all the good it mattered that I was even there.
So many complain about what bankers, especially the international and central bankers, are doing to our country. Yet, hardly anybody seems to have noticed that those people are almost exclusively Jewish.
Behind Every Tree
They are everywhere in the media, particularly Hollywood. Talking heads, movie stars and the like. ...Pay attention and you will be amazed. The names won’t always be a good guideline, however, given how many changed their names at the turn of last century, so as to meld into the American population of that time.
Jews seem to comprise about 50% of America’s population, based upon those in visible positions. Looks can be deceiving, like Harvard, where they are drawn to those positions by their money, their intelligence and, most importantly, the indulgence of their kosher comrades.
People refuse to notice the Jewish hands on virtually ever power lever in the US federal government. Or at the helm of virtually every media organization that exists, and throughout the executive and editorial ranks. And, it’s not just Jews that control America - they are Zionists. Even Ariel Sharon, Israel’s current Prime Minister, has said openly, “Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that . . I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it” - Oct.‘01. Problem is, most of us seem not to know it
The Power Behind the Throne
Books have been written on the subject, but, essentially, a group of late 19th-century elites, comprised of Rockefeller, Morgan and others, mostly Jewish, established an organization designed to consolidate their control of America and, eventually, the entire world. It was called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Offshoots, such as the Bilderbergers, have formed since then, but the objective has never slipped from their sight.
One of the first acts of CFR’s members was to survey the newspaper field, the sole mass media of the time, and conclude that purchasing control of only 25 major newspapers would give them effective control of news dissemination. They bought those papers and, since then, many, many more. Today, members of these shadowy organizations literally run virtually all of the media, control the political structure in America, much of world business and are firmly in control of world banking.
That is why the two political parties in America have become identical, so as to provide us rubes with the illusion of throwing the rascals out come election time, yet with the same old agenda not missing a beat. Did you really see a difference from Bush to Clinton to Bush? They knew what NAFTA would do to America’s manufacturing base and job structure, yet both parties embraced it. We’re firmly on path to one-world government. America writ large, but the America now being molded without individual civil rights, not the America of the 20th Century. And it’s largely kosher.
Read about The “Israeli Spy Ring Scandal” for a particularly chilling look into the extent of the Israeli spy ring recently uncovered in America and Israel’s extensive US telephone network ownership.
It is not the purpose of this essay to prove Jewish control of America. There is ample material available on the internet for those who wish to prove it for themselves. Rather, it is my purpose to show that there are perfectly valid and understandable, even laudable, reasons for being anti-Semitic. Resenting those who manipulate us on a daily basis, against our own best interests, is primary among them.
Hate laws are a singularly Jewish invention being foisted upon an unsuspecting public, so as to preemptively remove the possibility of criticism of themselves. Often written by the ADL, the organization that lobbies for their adoption, state by state, the laws are designed to stifle dissent and speaking out.
Susan Lindauer, peace activist, 9/11 activist, former CIA asset, and true American patriot, talks to DanielS and GW about power, politics and corruption, immigration, and the future of America and the West. You cannot fail to learn something new from an hour’s conservation with this remarkable woman..
War is a harvest for the chosen – i.e., not you, or anyone else halfway normal.
Making official what has been de facto for months, Ukrainian President Poroshenko has announced suspension of public services and funds to people of the Eastern Provinces.
Kiev stopped funding for pensions, educational and medical facilities in eastern Ukraine.
For those rebel controlled areas, Poroshenko instructed the Kiev government to cease all activities of state-owned enterprises, institutions and organizations. This cuts-off pensioners, who are on their own, and applies also to the administration of schools, hospitals and ambulance services.
The war has also destroyed infrastructure and homes, leaving many desperate for shelter. With the winter coming on, this is a death sentence to many. Those in jeopardy are afraid to speak-out, terrorized with the threat of death or imprisonment. In the meantime, there is a shocking uncaring among the populace of the unaffected areas. From Poroshenko on down, the attitude is one that this is the choice of the peoples in the Eastern provinces and they are getting what they deserve.
In fact, Poroshenko may well be building a case against himself, a portfolio replete with a litany of war crimes. The people of Ukraine, consuming the “Western” propaganda fed them, have all too often become as callous as the YKW who abide of common folk blamed and killed for crimes of The Soviet era and more accurately, for internecine animus stirred-up by Israel’s proxies.
It would perhaps not be so surprising for youth to succumb to crass material appeals of the West, nor for that matter, for the callous uncaring of those “Jew-wise” National-Socialists Banderas to be animated by ultra nationalism as a result of Western bribes, propaganda and instigation to war, but even older folks have turned their backs on people they could be looking in the mirror at – turned their backs, ensconced in the expert propaganda, psychological conditioning and bribes from the YKW and their bottomless funds.
Yes, so cynical and ruthless they are in their aims that they would even use “Nazis” to fuel war and fund their harvest. Note who Victoria Nuland met with and promoted in her nation building efforts. These “Nazis” of course, report right back, hands out for another bribe to join The EU. A lot of good that is for European nationalists, yes?
While the people of the East, enculturated to not trust the West (with good reason) resist Westernization, they are caught in a no man’s land. They are not in Russia and not under its jurisdiction. Putin’s Russia, having a commitment to being a “non-racist” proposition nation is not perfectly innocent of course, from a WN standpoint, but quite reasonably does not want Nato and The EU (or literal Nazis) at its border any more than The US would want Soviet missiles in Cuba or Red Army troops in Mexico.
Putin has been harangued for not helping these people who have been cut-off from the Ukrainian state. However, it is not a part of Russia, it is a part of Ukraine, and Russian lorries carrying food and aid are not always being allowed to get through to the people in need. Where are Victoria Nuland’s 5 billion going?
Frank Salter: Accept that the State is no longer ours, that we may rebuild radically anew, embedding our national interests of our people.
In the West people are not mobilized in their own defense and why is that? Our Majorities are faced with a fundamental structural problem.
That is historically based….. when the nation states of Europe were formed (such as) England initially, there were a dozen Kingdoms….the consolidation of those small principalities came about through an implicit promise ..the promise was that the new centralized government would adopt the functions of the small tribal governments: so it would defend the people, on the same principle, it would defend externally and maintain internal peace.. it would not betray the basic interests of the society….there was an implicit understanding or assumption that the elite is invested emotionally in the people, that it is tied to the people, that it comes from the people….the people expected their elites to not be alien, not to hate them, not be hostile towards them, but to be drawn from them, and to actually feel one with them…so there was an assumption of identity defense…of concern about continuity and so on…
That is all broken down now. The elite do not identify with the people anymore - those normal aspirations for identity continuity. The fact is that the nation/state model (two separate terms there) - Nation, the bond of the heart, and State, the apparatus of government - have become separated; they don’t have the same relationship one to the other that they did even a hundred years ago. But still the assumption is there, that those functions are being performed; when the opposite functions are being performed! These States are actually overseeing replacement, a demographic revolution that’s taking place.
So, I argue that in this light what needs to happen is that the Majorities actually, in a way, need to accept their defeat. Sort of a radical thing, some people object to this. But I think we need to accept, acknowledge the profundity of our defeat and accept that the government is no longer ours. The State no longer belongs to the people. Once one has faced that harsh truth, then one can start thinking what we can do to survive in the future as a people.
We need to starve these governments of resources; and rather we must build-up alternate national organizations that are well embedded in the people.
We are on a healthy trajectory right now with some fight-back in Europe. But for me the real sign of health will be when Tony Blair finds himself in court charged with treason. That would be a clear sign that something healthy is happening.
You know that the Blair government deliberately set-about to flood Britain with third-world immigrants as a way of breaking the spirit of conservatives…so that they would give up the fight to try to retain their country. I view that as least arguably criminal and if laws don’t exist - and I suspect laws don’t exist for prosecuting people like Blair - the law should be created.
- By William Hanna On 17 July 1998, the international community reached an historic milestone — that has so far proved of little useful purpose — when 120 States adopted the Rome Statute (http://legal.un.org/icc/statute/romefra.htm), the legal basis for establishing a permanent International Criminal Court (ICC). The Court’s mandate was “to try individuals rather than States, and to hold such persons accountable for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, namely the crime of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression, when the conditions for the exercise of the Court’s jurisdiction over the latter are fulfilled.” Therefore on that basis and in view of the fact that Israel has for over 60 years painstakingly ensured qualification for all four of the aforementioned criminal categories, then why has the ICC failed to initiate proceedings against those Israelis who with impunity were and still are instrumental in the barbaric ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people?
“Attorney of the damned”, author of “Defensive Racism” dies imprisoned by ZOG
“Get the story out folks” - Stan Hess
From: Cyndi Steele, Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 8:35 PM
Subject: News about Ed that I prayed I would never have to deliver!
“The past 4 years Ed and my family have been living in a nightmare. Today, my greatest fear has come to life or maybe I should say death. Please read the message below that is being posted on the Free Edgar Steele website and sent to all of his supporters as I type this. It is with great heartbreak and devastation that I send you this news.”
I think there is every indication that Britain has reached its Camp of the Saints moment, where millions of immigrants from every corner of the globe are now making their presence felt in so many negative ways, housing, jobs, overburdened institutions, social cohesion, lost of identity, crime, and not least, a national void and sense of foreboding.
Our elites are showing no sign of let up, the rip tide of humanity landing on our shores (and through our airports) is applauded by the liberal establishment, and yet still the majority of natives cannot understand the logic of it all. The tipping point looms nearer by each single day.
In Raspail’s story the liberal elites cave at every turn, until only Switzerland remains as an armed nation of resistance, only for them to crumble in the final hour in the full glare of liberal guilt, France is lost, western civilisation is lost.
There is no indication in Raspail’s thinking that the white race is under threat of existence from a deliberate attack by unknown dark forces or who would undertake such a dastardly plan.
Raspail’s tale tells us western civilisation had lost confidence in itself and in some way had no right to determine its tribe’s own future, like rabbits in the headlamp’s glare, whites are paralysed to act in their own defence.
Perhaps Britain is at this stage in the cycle of mass immigration, for there is no real sign of resistance from the mass of the people, still less as to what will galvanise them into any future kind of action.
Further, Raspail’s unfolding imagination does not extend to a narrative where Britain and America are engaged in fermenting a World war in which to bring about their New World Order, all of which throws Rumsfeld unknown-unknowns into immigration chaos.
As I have commented before, it seems when the elites have accomplished their goal, there is no plan B as to what will replace it.
How and when will we know when all is won or lost?
First lecture, regarding Obama’s maternal antecedent:
“Obama’s momma was trash. Obama’s momma got pregnant with him out of wedlock, that’s right. And Obama’s momma was only 17 when she got knocked up by that African from over there in Kenya ...Obama’s momma was dirt, she was a bag of trash sitting on the sidewalk waiting there in Honolulu on one of those streets for the garbage truck to come by and pick her up and take her to the dump; rather than the garbage truck coming by, a man named Obama, Barrack Obama, Sr. from Kenya (came). This man who died in a violent accident at the age of 46, who had two iron legs in Kenya..he lost his legs in a violent automobile accident, driving drunk there in Kenya.. but he kept drinking and driving and finally he killed himself with those two iron legs.. the man was a pathetic loser knocking up women all over the Kenyan village of Africa, that’s Obama’s father. Well he knocked up Obama’s mother when she was 17…
My momma told me, and I trust my momma, and her momma told her and she trusts her momma, and I trust both of them. But my momma told me back in the 50’s and 60’s, the only kind of white woman that took-up with a black man was a trashy white woman, was a sluicy, a floozy, a low-life snail eatin’ white woman. That’s the kind of white woman that Obama’s momma was, that was what my momma told me. And if you don’t like it you can tell my momma that you don’t like it. But my momma told me and my momma’s momma told her, that all the momma’s in the communities of blacks saw all those trashy white women hanging around on the outskirts of town with their skirts jacked-up and their breast showing, hoping that some of the black men would take an interest in them, they were nothing but trash. Well Obama’s momma was nothing but trash!”
While we are (in 299 words) addressing David Duke and his single greatest cause issue - Jewish power and influence - with his admonition against their strategy of divide-and-conquer, we should ask..
Is it not possible that our traitorous White plutocrats would be happy to have us fight a war against that which is also their greatest enemy - Jewish power and biocultural patterns - and use us as cannon fodder?
What, after all, have they done for us?
What have they done to merit our loyalty?
What have they done to fight Jewish power and influence? mass non-White immigration into European peoples’ habitats? the destruction of European cultures and people?
Fratricidal tendency, boding against race as a practical organizational concept, issues one of the most significant challenges to advocates of people of native European descent.
Subtitle: Graham’s shirked paternal responsibility in that regard.
To intervene and ameliorate fraternal relations, perhaps, or to argue more thoroughly as to why race is not the proper group membership concern.
Needless to say, betrayal by those close to us is among the hardest challenges to cope with in life, and the most de-motivating of defending E.G.I.
It is prima facie an acute issue to deal with and one that would require some of our top guns to handle properly - the likes of Dr. Lister and Frank Salter. Their help and more, of course, is needed in addressing this matter which we have all felt too closely to handle rationally by ourselves. What I mean by “fratricidal tendencies” is something quite general - antagonism of those closely related, ranging from irresponsible negligence to literal fratricide and war between our closely kindred people.
As we are so invested and investing in these people, the pursuit of remedy to these conflicts has created our most painful and destructive moments, where we did and gave our best to people who betrayed us - we became enemies to ourselves.
Every man, woman and child lives under a nuclear sword of Damocles,
hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any moment by
accident, or miscalculation, or by madness. The weapons of war must be
abolished before they abolish us.
—President John F. Kennedy at the United Nations General Assembly on
Sept. 25, 1961.
Let’s start with acknowledged instances of the use of nuclear weapons and
some officially unacknowledged ones.
The essay is related to the futility of trying to correct blatant
disinformation on Wikipedia pages regarding the JFK assassination. What is the
“real Wikipedia” according to Mroz? It’s simply what Wikipedia claims to
be: a wiki edited by the general public, and one that maintains a neutral
viewpoint. Mroz’s problems at Wikipedia certainly haven’t stemmed from his
being in the minority. In the U.S., surveys have shown that two-thirds to
three-fourths of the population doesn’t buy the lone assassin/Oswald claim.
So how does one explain Wikipedia “neutrality”?
The previous parts established that JFK was killed by at least three hitmen:
Lucien Sarti and the other two likely François Chiappe and Jean-Paul
Angeletti. Hired guns are mercenaries, and have no personal stake in the
matter. This part addresses the people who hired these hitmen.
The following factors would’ve motivated the murder of JFK:
JFK’s would-be assassination was revealed a month before his murder. The
revealer was U.S. army cryptographer Eugene B. Dinkin. An early source of this
information is Bloody Treason by Noel Twyman, and it’s mentioned in
LBJ, the Mastermind of the JFK Assassination by Phillip Nelson. The
following excerpts from Nelson’s book are found on pages 360-362:
Exactly one month before JFK was assassinated, a cryptographic code
operator working for the U.S. Army Ordinance [sic] in Metz, France, tried to
alert his superiors—all the way up to Robert F. Kennedy—that John F.
Kennedy would be assassinated in November, in Texas. An FBI report dated
April 9, 1964, confirmed that Eugene B. Dinkin, entrusted with the
military’s highest Crypto clearance, predicted “that a conspiracy was in
the making for the ‘military’ of the United States, perhaps combined with
an ‘ultra right wing economic group’.” He discovered the plot as he
routinely processed messages between the plotters (i.e., Bill Harvey and/or
Guy Bannister [sic] and QJ/WIN, a hit man of French origin, associated with
the Antoine Guerini Mob headquartered in Marseilles, France. A number of
known hit men were part of this gang, some known variously as Carlos Rigal,
Victor Michael Mertz, Michel Roux, Lucien Sarti, or Jean Soutre).
The 50th anniversary of JFK’s murder is on Nov. 22, 2013. Some believe
that before 9/11, the JFK murder was the greatest game-changing event in the
century that has passed. I don’t know whether this assertion is correct, but
the event had major significance, and it’s time to take a look at the JFK
Part 1 addresses whether the official story about who killed JFK is
Yes, the radical left is sick with anti-racism, egalitarianism, and internationalism. It disvalues the family. It denies blood, it denies Nature. But it is capable of a sophisticated critique of liberalism which is remarkably similar to that of the New Right. More than that, because it holds the universities in its palm, it is capable of protest. It is capable of making an impact.
Occupy Wall Street, which I wrote about here, is or was one such impact. That the American Establishment took it deadly seriously is now made clear.
the merger of the private sector, DHS and the FBI means that any of us can become WikiLeaks, a point that Julian Assange was trying to make in explaining the argument behind his recent book. The fusion of the tracking of money and the suppression of dissent means that a huge area of vulnerability in civil society – people’s income streams and financial records – is now firmly in the hands of the banks, which are, in turn, now in the business of tracking your dissent
... this one:
the release may be strategic: if you are an Occupy activist and see how your information is being sent to terrorism task forces and fusion centers, not to mention the “longterm plans” of some redacted group to shoot you, this document is quite the deterrent.
... and this one:
Remember that only 10% of the money donated to WikiLeaks can be processed – because of financial sector and DHS-sponsored targeting of PayPal data. With this merger, that crushing of one’s personal or business financial freedom can happen to any of us. How messy, criminalizing and prosecuting dissent. How simple, by contrast, just to label an entity a “terrorist organization” and choke off, disrupt or indict its sources of financing.
Then read this extraordinary account of the previously unseen meshing of American banks, commerce, and the FBI and other agencies, as they strove to destroy the Occupy Movement in August 2011.
This is the Money Power doing what it wants. The police state which is America today is both the result of that and the future vehicle for it
At first it wasn’t clear whether the mysterious individual blamed for the
attacks, Anders Behring Breivik, was a scapegoat or patsy. But the cues were
there though overlooked by many. One clue was Anders Breivik’s amazing beard,
capable of changing within seconds.
Source of these
pictures. You know it’s not lighting. Breivik was all smiles for the
cameras, in sharp contrast to his being camera shy on 22 July, 2011, when he
evaded being filmed on CCTV all the way through his hours-long drive to the
seat of the government and then to Utøya Island, and he also managed to avoid
being captured on any of the hundreds of cell phones on Utøya Island.
The undergrad degree data don’t support Murray’s proposed explanation
for the Great Divide. Undergrad science and engineering majors that might lead
to advanced science degrees are grossly underrepresented in the 1% group. They
are so underrepresented that this data alone falsifies Murray’s primary
“Biology” obviously serves as a proxy for “pre-med.” Humanities
majors of the kind that comprise “pre-law” curriculums are heavily
over-represented. History, “economics,” and political science are obvious
pre-law programs. What to make of zoology and physiology, except failure to
make the cut for “pre-med”? Note that mathematics and physics are on the
bottom. Computer science and mechanical/electrical/civil engineering didn’t
make the list.
Readers will be aware of legislative endeavors such as SOPA and PIPA (also
ACTA and others), superficially intended to tackle the problem of piracy of
digital copyrighted content, and the recent seizure of megaupload.com and
associated arrests. Whereas the copyright owners could work out deals with file
hosts to charge reasonable fees for the distribution of their copyrighted
content, they’re not interested. It has been pointed out that a major reason
is that they wish to control the dissemination of information—“they”
being the very small minority that owns the copyrights to the majority of
accessible-for-fee digital content. Digital technologies make it easy to
cheaply produce, or simply upload, and use the bandwidth of file hosts, such as
the former megaupload, to disseminate gigabytes of information that the
authorities may not like. But there are two other perspectives that should also
The first is about the nature of copyrighted content and the meaning of
piracy. The pirate bay says:
Over a century ago Thomas Edison got the patent for a device which would
“do for the eye what the phonograph does for the ear.” He called it the
Kinetoscope. He was not only amongst the first to record video, he was also
the first person to own the copyright to a motion picture.
Because of Edison’s patents for the motion pictures it was close to
financially impossible to create motion pictures in the North American east
coast. The movie studios therefore relocated to California, and founded what
we today call Hollywood. The reason was mostly because there was no patent.
There was also no copyright to speak of, so the studios could copy old
stories and make movies out of them—like
Fantasia, one of Disney’s biggest hits ever.
So, the whole basis of this industry, that today is screaming about losing
control over immaterial rights, is that they circumvented immaterial rights.
They copied (or put in their terminology: “stole”) other people’s
creative works, without paying for it. They did it in order to make a huge
profit. Today they’re all successful and most of the studios are on the
Fortune 500 list of the richest companies in the world.
Congratulations—it’s all based on being able to re-use other people’s
creative works. And today they hold the rights to what other people
If you want to get something released, you have to abide to their rules.
The ones they created after circumventing other people’s rules.
The reason they are always complaintng about “pirates” today is
simple. We’ve done what they did. We circumvented the rules they created
and created our own. We crushed their monopoly by giving people something
more efficient. We allow people to have direct communication between each
other, circumventing the profitable middle man, that in some cases take over
107% of the profits (yes, you pay to work for them).
It’s all based on the fact that we’re competition. We’ve proven that
their existence in their current form is no longer needed. We’re just
better than they are.
And the funny part is that our rules are very similar to the founding
ideas of the USA. We fight for freedom of speech. We see all people as equal.
We believe that the public, not the elite, should rule the nation. We believe
that laws should be created to serve the public, not the rich
The Pirate Bay is truly an international community. The team is spread all
over the globe—but we’ve stayed out of the USA. We have Swedish roots and
a Swedish friend said this: The word SOPA means “trash” in Swedish. The
word PIPA means “a pipe” in Swedish. This is of course not a coincidence.
They want to make the internet into a one-way pipe, with them at the top,
shoving trash through the pipe down to the rest of us obedient consumers. The
public opinion on this matter is clear. Ask anyone on the street and you’ll
learn that no one wants to be fed with trash. Why the U.S. government wants
the American people to be fed with trash is beyond our imagination but we
hope that you will stop them, before we all drown...
...To fix the “problem of piracy” one should go to the source of the
problem. The entertainment industry say they’re creating “culture” but
what they really do is stuff like selling overpriced plushy dolls and making
11-year-old girls become anorexic... either from working in the factories
that creates the dolls for basically no salary or by watching movies and tv
shows that make them think that they’re fat.
Thaddeus Russell provides additional details about how Thomas Edison’s
intellectual property and equipment were stolen:
Soon after he invented the motion picture camera and projector, Thomas
Edison formed his own movie production and distribution company. In 1908,
Edison joined with nine other film companies to form the Motion Picture
Patents Company, a monopoly that attempted to control the making,
distribution, and showing of all movies in the United States. Edison and
“The Trust” pledged to make only movies that promoted wholesome,
Christian, and “American” values. But on the Lower East Side, a group of
entrepreneurial Jewish immigrants used Edison’s inventions to produce and
screen their own films, which were shown in thousands of nickelodeons –
five-cent movie theaters – in working-class neighborhoods all over the
country. These “outlaw” filmmakers started out as vaudeville and
burlesque promoters, and many of their movies were sexier, more violent, and
far more entertaining than the bland fare put out by the Edison monopoly.
The great inventor was furious that “Jewish profiteers” were stealing
his patent, getting rich from it, and using it to spread “smut” across
America. So too were law enforcement officials. In 1907 a judge in Chicago
wrote that the nickelodeons “caused, indirectly or directly, more juvenile
crime coming into my court than all other causes combined.” Shortly
thereafter the Chicago city council passed an ordinance granting power to the
chief of police to censor motion pictures played in the city. In New York in
1907, soon after the police commissioner recommended that nickel shows be
wiped out entirely, Mayor George McClellan was so moved by the evidence of
immoral motion pictures polluting the minds of his citizens that on Christmas
Day he ordered that all of the illicit motion picture houses be shut down.
Moral condemnations and court injunctions didn’t stop the proliferation
of nickelodeons that showed unseemly fare and violated Edison’s patent, so
the inventor and his colleagues hired squads of thugs to shut them down. They
seized film, beat up directors and actors, forced audiences out of theaters,
smashed the nickelodeon arcades and set fire to entire city blocks where they
were concentrated. But fortunately for the Jewish renegades, they lived and
operated in neighborhoods where hundreds of soldiers stood ready and able to
protect them – men like “Big” Jack Zelig, “Lefty Louie” Rosenberg,
“Gyp the Blood” Horowitz, Joe “The Greaser” Rosenzweig, and the
leaders of the notorious Yiddish Black Hand, Jacob “Johnny” Levinsky and
“Charley the Cripple” Vitoffsky. There were even women ready for the
fight – fierce, well-armed “gun-mols” like Bessie London, Tillie
Finkelstein, Birdie Pomerantz, and Jennie “The Factory” Morris.
Cameras, projectors, film, and sound equipment disappeared from the
storerooms of Edison companies and showed up on makeshift movie lots on the
Lower East Side. Bullets rained down on the Trust’s enforcers from the
rooftops of nickelodeons. And massive fires destroyed the Edison
distributors’ warehouses in the Bronx, Philadelphia, and Chicago. By 1915
the Trust had disbanded and the outlaw filmmakers moved west, where they
could make bigger and better movies. Who were the men who, with the help of
their nicknamed friends, fought Thomas Edison and the law and won? They were
Marcus Loew of Loews Theatres and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Carl Laemmle of
Universal Pictures, Adolph Zukor of Paramount Pictures, William Fox of
Twentieth-Century Fox, and the brothers Harry, Albert, Sam, and Jack
The second issue’s about disposable income. Most people will support the
singers, musicians, authors and content producers they like if they have
disposable income, but the same community that has acquired copyright of most
written works, music, TV programming and movies produced in recent decades,
producing a substantial amount of this work in bad faith—e.g., lies,
propaganda—is also behind international banking, thereby impoverishing the majority and making disposable income hard
to come up with.
A recent proposal has argued that nationalists should try to seek
reproduction with higher IQ whites so that:
“They will naturally rise to the highest levels
of society and victory will be inevitable. This is how the white race will be
The prospects can be empirically evaluated. Richard Lynn has extensively
summarized IQ studies on Jews. Most studies are non-representative. A
representative American study reported a Jewish (Ashkenazi) verbal IQ of 107.5.
Two representative British studies have reported Jewish (Ashkenazi) IQs as
108.5 and 107.7 (verbal = 107.3, non-verbal = 108.0). The best reading of
American and British Ashkenazi IQ is 110. The average white IQ in these regions
In the U.S., there are about 200 million whites and 6.5 million Jews.
Assuming a standard deviation of 15 in both populations, we get the
Approximate number of Jewish and white Americans with
IQs greater than specified scores
IQ greater than
x Times whites outnumber Jews
Percent Jews in a random sample of Jews and whites in America