Category: Global Elitism
According to Salvador Astucia, the singlemost important reason behind the assassination of JFK was JFK’s attempt to establish détente with the Soviet Union. Let’s see why this was a big issue.
Posted by R-news on Wednesday, November 27, 2013 at 01:54 PM in Books, Economics & Finance, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Military Matters, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
J.P. Mroz has written a three-part essay titled Will the Real Wikipedia Please Stand Up?: http://www.ctka.net/2010/wiki.html.
The essay is related to the futility of trying to correct blatant disinformation on Wikipedia pages regarding the JFK assassination. What is the “real Wikipedia” according to Mroz? It’s simply what Wikipedia claims to be: a wiki edited by the general public, and one that maintains a neutral viewpoint. Mroz’s problems at Wikipedia certainly haven’t stemmed from his being in the minority. In the U.S., surveys have shown that two-thirds to three-fourths of the population doesn’t buy the lone assassin/Oswald claim. So how does one explain Wikipedia “neutrality”?
Posted by R-news on Saturday, November 23, 2013 at 03:57 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
The previous parts established that JFK was killed by at least three hitmen: Lucien Sarti and the other two likely François Chiappe and Jean-Paul Angeletti. Hired guns are mercenaries, and have no personal stake in the matter. This part addresses the people who hired these hitmen.
The following factors would’ve motivated the murder of JFK:
Posted by R-news on Friday, November 22, 2013 at 11:28 AM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
This part addresses the assassins of JFK.
JFK’s would-be assassination was revealed a month before his murder. The revealer was U.S. army cryptographer Eugene B. Dinkin. An early source of this information is Bloody Treason by Noel Twyman, and it’s mentioned in LBJ, the Mastermind of the JFK Assassination by Phillip Nelson. The following excerpts from Nelson’s book are found on pages 360-362:
What happened to Dinkin? From Phillip Nelson we have:
Posted by R-news on Thursday, November 21, 2013 at 02:28 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
The 50th anniversary of JFK’s murder is on Nov. 22, 2013. Some believe that before 9/11, the JFK murder was the greatest game-changing event in the century that has passed. I don’t know whether this assertion is correct, but the event had major significance, and it’s time to take a look at the JFK murder.
Part 1 addresses whether the official story about who killed JFK is correct.
Posted by R-news on Wednesday, November 20, 2013 at 02:01 PM in Books, Education, Global Elitism, History, Media, Political analysis, That Question Again, U.S. Politics, World Affairs
I came upon the work of Frederick Parker-Rhodes in my quest for the ideal computer language, which I have elsewhere on MR discussed in relation to Heidegger’s “as” structure and GW’s ontology project. Recent work in theoretical physics has provided empirical validation to his “wildly eccentric” views—which managed to provide a priori derivations of the dimensionless scaling constants of physics from his ontology detailed in his book “The Theory of Indistinguishables”. To be brief, there is his “combinatorial hierarchy” that derives from FRP’s attempt to find the underlying mathematical structure of what he called “wholesight”.
Below the fold is an excerpt from “Wholesight: The Spirit Quest” by Frederick Parker-Rodes…
Posted by James Bowery on Monday, February 4, 2013 at 01:08 AM in Art & Design, Christianity, Economics & Finance, Environmentalism & Global Warming, Global Elitism, Globalisation, Science & Technology, Social Sciences, The Ontology Project
Yes, the radical left is sick with anti-racism, egalitarianism, and internationalism. It disvalues the family. It denies blood, it denies Nature. But it is capable of a sophisticated critique of liberalism which is remarkably similar to that of the New Right. More than that, because it holds the universities in its palm, it is capable of protest. It is capable of making an impact.
Occupy Wall Street, which I wrote about here, is or was one such impact. That the American Establishment took it deadly seriously is now made clear.
Take a moment or two to read this Guardian article, which is chock-full of observations like this one:
... this one:
... and this one:
Then read this extraordinary account of the previously unseen meshing of American banks, commerce, and the FBI and other agencies, as they strove to destroy the Occupy Movement in August 2011.
This is the Money Power doing what it wants. The police state which is America today is both the result of that and the future vehicle for it
On 22 July, 2011, Israel commemorated the 65th anniversary of the King David Hotel’s bombing in Palestine, by exploding bombs in Oslo, killing 8, and shooting dead 69 on Utøya Island. Israelis picked Norway for the celebrations because she had increasingly become sympathetic toward Muslims and in favor of a Palestinian State. Professor Ola Tunander concurred that only a State-level entity equivalent has the capability of pulling off such an operation, and this wouldn’t be the Norwegian administration slaughtering relatives on Utøya Island. Tunander knows Israel did it, but to avoid the heat, hinted at it, saying that some have suggested it was Israel’s handiwork. Given Tunander’s academic credentials, the mainstream media decided to keep Tunander’s analysis and the Israeli condemnation of it out of the Anglosphere.
At first it wasn’t clear whether the mysterious individual blamed for the attacks, Anders Behring Breivik, was a scapegoat or patsy. But the cues were there though overlooked by many. One clue was Anders Breivik’s amazing beard, capable of changing within seconds.
Posted by R-news on Sunday, July 22, 2012 at 01:35 PM in European Nationalism, Far Right, Global Elitism, Liberalism & the Left, Marxism & Culture War, Media, New Right, Political analysis, Popular Culture, Psychology, Social liberalism, That Question Again, White Nationalism, World Affairs
Tens of thousands of people in Poland have been taking to the streets, in freezing weather, to protest the government being open to the enforcement of ACTA (ACTA = Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement), which is administered by an international body outside local jurisdiction. It has been noted that the real reason for ACTA (also the Trans-Pacific Partnership; SOPA and PIPA) is an attempt to control the dissemination of information, not the superficial issue of violation of copyright.
[submission by Genotype]
Murray’s thesis is higher cognitive abilities lead to greater economic productivity and thus higher salaries. This is merely an update to Ayn Rand‘s update to Horatio Alger’s “rags to riches” legends.
Murray and his jewish employers at AEI have two transparent goals:
1.Describe what anyone with an IQ > 90 can see has happened and continues to happen economically.
2.Gain control of the discourse by eliminating all references to “The Other” from the universe of permitted explanations for #1.
The undergrad degree data don’t support Murray’s proposed explanation for the Great Divide. Undergrad science and engineering majors that might lead to advanced science degrees are grossly underrepresented in the 1% group. They are so underrepresented that this data alone falsifies Murray’s primary explanation.
“Biology” obviously serves as a proxy for “pre-med.” Humanities majors of the kind that comprise “pre-law” curriculums are heavily over-represented. History, “economics,” and political science are obvious pre-law programs. What to make of zoology and physiology, except failure to make the cut for “pre-med”? Note that mathematics and physics are on the bottom. Computer science and mechanical/electrical/civil engineering didn’t make the list.
Posted by R-news on Saturday, January 28, 2012 at 06:59 PM in Blogs & Blogging, Economics & Finance, Education, Global Elitism, Political analysis, Social Sciences, That Question Again
Readers will be aware of legislative endeavors such as SOPA and PIPA (also ACTA and others), superficially intended to tackle the problem of piracy of digital copyrighted content, and the recent seizure of megaupload.com and associated arrests. Whereas the copyright owners could work out deals with file hosts to charge reasonable fees for the distribution of their copyrighted content, they’re not interested. It has been pointed out that a major reason is that they wish to control the dissemination of information—“they” being the very small minority that owns the copyrights to the majority of accessible-for-fee digital content. Digital technologies make it easy to cheaply produce, or simply upload, and use the bandwidth of file hosts, such as the former megaupload, to disseminate gigabytes of information that the authorities may not like. But there are two other perspectives that should also be discussed.
The first is about the nature of copyrighted content and the meaning of piracy. The pirate bay says:
Thaddeus Russell provides additional details about how Thomas Edison’s intellectual property and equipment were stolen:
The second issue’s about disposable income. Most people will support the singers, musicians, authors and content producers they like if they have disposable income, but the same community that has acquired copyright of most written works, music, TV programming and movies produced in recent decades, producing a substantial amount of this work in bad faith—e.g., lies, propaganda—is also behind international banking, thereby impoverishing the majority and making disposable income hard to come up with.
The Hell with these people!
A recent proposal has argued that nationalists should try to seek reproduction with higher IQ whites so that:
“They will naturally rise to the highest levels of society and victory will be inevitable. This is how the white race will be saved.”
The prospects can be empirically evaluated. Richard Lynn has extensively summarized IQ studies on Jews. Most studies are non-representative. A representative American study reported a Jewish (Ashkenazi) verbal IQ of 107.5. Two representative British studies have reported Jewish (Ashkenazi) IQs as 108.5 and 107.7 (verbal = 107.3, non-verbal = 108.0). The best reading of American and British Ashkenazi IQ is 110. The average white IQ in these regions is 100.
In the U.S., there are about 200 million whites and 6.5 million Jews. Assuming a standard deviation of 15 in both populations, we get the following.
As anyone can see, Jews haven’t achieved their spectacular success (e.g., control of the mainstream media, ZOG, etc.) as a result of IQ; they achieved it by acquiring control of the money supply. Nationalists are advised to target getting back control of the money supply instead of trying to increase IQ. I’m not against increasing IQ, but IQ just isn’t relevant to the matter.
Posted by R-news on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 at 09:44 PM in Anthropology, European Nationalism, Global Elitism, IQ and Heredity, Jewish Diaspora, That Question Again, White Nationalism
So what is Max Keiser about? OK, he’s the best in the media on the power and criminality of the banks. No question. But is he just a left-leaning enemy of the money-changers? I think probably so.
Lee John Barnes, the plucky, slightly off-the-wall character who fields some of the legal issues of the BNP and whose blog proclaims itself 21st Century British Nationalism, has corrected last week’s pretty surprising piece by porn-goy Larry Flynt at Huffington Post.
Flynt appears to be picking-up the late Aaron Russo’s populist baton. He succinctly explained the lie of the land, so to speak, to the Huffington readership. It wasn’t a question of left vs right, he said, but of the globalist class vs the people of America. Then he called for campaign finance reform and for a date to be set for a 24-hour national strike. Forty-eight pages of approving comments followed.
This was interesting because it shows that the evisceration of the global elite is not, as Lee maintains, a purely nationalist interest but extends to all corners. Of course, it’s true that the Huffington commentariat obediently profess all the positions on white American and European dispossession and racial dissolution that characterise the elite’s drive for global political hegemony. But that’s because for the most part they are weak and suggestible conformists, not because they really hold those or any other political positions free and clear of external pressure. In a different political culture they would conform to whatever ideology was dominant. C’est la vie.
Lee helpfully lists the categories of elites that strangely elude Flynt, making the point that the Huffington liberals are part of the problem too:
I think he only left out the big political whores of the right.
Now we wait to find out if Larry Flynt has what it takes to talk revenge to the masses, and make something happen. He describes himself as a free speech activist - the “free speech” in question being his right under the Constitution to “communicate” his business to the American public. He clearly has the self-image of a hammer of the devout and the shocked. Taking on the demonic elites, however …
Global media billionaire Rupert Murdoch, the Chairman and Chief executive of News Corporation, has returned to his native land to deliver the 2008 Boyer Lectures. The series is titled “A Golden Age of Freedom”.
The Boyer Lectures are a series of six live speeches touching on politics and society, and given each year by a different major public figure in Australia. The equivalent in the UK is the Reith Lectures.
Murdoch opened today with an offering rather oddly titled “Aussie rules: Bring back the pioneer”. It served to outline his intentions for the rest of the series:-
One wonders what “the rise of new nations” means. It does not sound like the rise of old nations like India and China. Then again, “internationalisation”, as Murdoch later calls it, implies not new nations but the post-nation - essentially the MultiCult. Is he saying that the condition of Australia is that of a post-nation, and that the advent of the artificial “new nation” awaits - if the appropriate internationalist outlook is internalised by Aussies?
I assume so. But right away we see what Murdoch’s new nation will amount to. The only understanding that the man who made his money from Page 3 has of human purpose is material advancement. He is offering a life of consumerism and wage-slavery in return for the cinematic Arthur Jensen’s:-
Here it is again in Murdoch’s only slightly more prosaic version:-
A video site I had not heard of til today. Very varied content, some of it close to the mainstream. The ever-present theme, however, is the hand of the powerful and corrupt.
Hat-tip to Troy Southgate.
I’ve been wondering how the unprecedented debacle in the money business impacts upon the theory of an imperiously capable global elite. How does one explain that where there were five organisations in America bearing the prestigious title “investment bank”, now there are none? Not even Goldman Sachs has hung on to its former status, notwithstanding its long tradition of planting its senior executives in the executive. How did the Masters of the Universe get things so fundamentally, spectacularly wrong?
Of course, the completely staggering quantities of public money that have been committed across the world to stave off further collapse could be said to argue for the political power of the banking elites. Or they could if the end result had not been the hugely embarrassing nationalisation of some very old names.
I admit to being puzzled. Are we to model a system where Lazard et Freres conspired, while the rest played their juvenile games with money they did not have, and only went to Bilderberg, Davos and the Grove to add to their collection of hotel towels?
Anybody care to explain?
Two book reviews by Dr K R Bolton FCIS
An online survey on the beliefs of 5700 New Zealanders showed that 22% believe it “likely” that “a secret elite cabal controls world affairs”, with 21% responding that they don’t know, and 57% stating “unlikely”. (Sunday Star Times, C2, 31 Aug. 08).
Given the ridicule attached to “conspiracy theories” the percentage is encouraging, indicating that a significant proportion of New Zealanders are aware of political realities, or at least discern intuitively that something is amiss.
While such beliefs are lumped in by the Sunday Star Times with superstitions and whether Elvis faked his own death (to which very few responded positively) etc. the ongoing success of alternative news -stand magazines such as New Dawn from Australia, and in particular Jon Eisen’s Uncensored (NZ) show that many New Zealanders are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with what had been described as the ‘village idiot theory of history’ - that stuff just happens at random - as portrayed by the mass media.
The following are two book reviews on conspiracy theories, adapted from an article originally appearing in the first issue of Restoration Magazine.
Cyclicity of Conspiracy Theory
The popularity of conspiracy theories follows cyclic trends after periods of crises. The French Revolution gave rise to the modern theory of conspiracies in general, ascribing the subversion and breakdown of the traditional order to the influences of Masonic coteries, including the Illuminati, from whence other conspiracy theories have followed, often encompassing communism, Zionism, international finance, and such groups as the Bilderbergers, Council, on Foreign Relations, Lodge 322 and Trilateralists.
The 1905 Russian Revolution popularised the hitherto obscure Protocols of Zion, again with a Masonic theme, but with a Jewish façade, although doctrine of the Protocols has nothing of the nature of Zionism per se about it.
Since such theories were generally of a ‘right-wing nature,’ and often linked to ‘anti-Semitism’, World War II drove them into disrepute.
The Cold War revived conspiracy theories, and 9/11 has given impetus to a revival of interest in covert cabals such a Masonry not seen since the Russia Revolution. Impetus has been added with the revival of alternative religions and the questioning of mainstream religion, including the popularity of books such as those about the alleged Prior de Sion by Baigent, et al. They have also revived an interest in the role of the Illuminati.
The story in yesterday morning’s Telegraph was unambiguous and damning:-
This situation of the investigator obstructed at every turn by shadowy Establishment forces crops up with alarming regularity in large-scale child abuse cases. In Jersey the obstruction takes the form largely of an official code of silence. Since Jersey is a family holiday destination, one could charitably conclude that these are the machinations of a pack of Larry Vaughn types (Vaughn being the “don’t-rock-the-boat” Mayor of Amity artfully played by Murray Hamilton in both Jaws and Jaws 2: “I’m only trying to say that Amity is a summer town. We need summer dollars. Now, if the people can’t swim here, they’ll be glad to swim at the beaches of Cape Cod, the Hamptons, Long Island ...”)
Jersey, however, is a highly successful if no longer entirely off-shore banking centre. Its wealthy residents are perfectly content to avoid prying eyes - indeed, that’s the whole point of being there. There is, then, a darker materialism at work on the island than a mere interest in ice cream sales and beach balls, and this interest is surely what Harper means by “an old boy network”. The implication for any revelations damaging to the zeitgeist of confidentiality, never mind allegations of child abuse, are plain. There will all too probably be an outbreak of “official incompetence”. As the News of the World reported on 13th July:-
Lenny Harper has now gone from the enquiry.
MR commenter Alex has posted (and is still posting!) some very interesting material on one of our recent threads, and I think it merits a full post.
In it he links two aspects of the NWO project: the deracination of European Man and the creation of a new United States of North America. In its entirety the project - literally the creation of a Global Age of the Power Elites - is dependent on nation-killng, of course, and that is deeply dependent on the destruction of racial diversity. For racial diversity is the whole of nationhood in the West, and without it there can be no ethnic (or, indeed, moral or ideological) counterwieght to the project.
The source material that Alex uses here is intriguing. It is a progressive manifesto from almost 140 years ago. One phrase from it I found particularly revealing. Describing the Future Deracinated Man it says he will possess “very different intellectual and moral characteristics from those which we possess today”.
We know our fight is for the life of our people itself. We don’t always appreciate in what little regard that life is held by our true adversaries.
Here is the post constructed from Alex’s comments. My thanks to him for bringing this to our attention.
Marvels That Our Grandchildren Will See
One of the few things I’d agree with FDR about is that things don’t just happen ‘by chance’ regarding political matters. Below is an excerpt from a book published in 1870 in the US by ‘progressives’, yes, the very same sort who about 60 years later would be thinking Stalin and his ‘five year plans’ was the greatest thing since sliced bread. The first section of the book describes the first ‘one hundred years progress’ of the United States (between 1770 and 1870) examining increasing production figures and values in those years in great detail for a wide variety of products.
Towards the latter portion of the book the writer attempts to describe things as they would be one hundred years in the future, in 1970. That section of the book is entitled
The future man is described on pg 515. Perhaps they should have called this “the future economic man.” Due to the American peoples wishes regarding immigration being respected at certain times, this has not come about in 1970. It’s not for lack of trying on these peoples’ parts though. One can’t help but notice the language used on this page (I’ve provided a link to it beneath this excerpt) is the same as would be used were a rancher attempting to breed a new strain of livestock. It does seem what is described in this excerpt is what they (financial and business elites, and multi-cultists) are trying to do throughout the West in 2008.
‘The Coming Man’
Now I’ll post a few additional excerpts from Marvels That Our Grandchildren Will See as they fit in with the subject.
Flemming Rose of cartoon fame ... George Pratt Shultz, 88 this year ... Dimitris Papalexopoulos, CEO of a Greek cement company ... Paul Wolfowitz, the first president World Bank to be (effectively) dismissed in its 62-year history ... There were some strange birds in Chantilly, Virginia when the Bilderberg 2008 came to town between 5th and 8th June. Amongst all the usual political, banking, legal and multinational suspects, there were about a dozen CEOs of companies I have never heard of.
Why was Harold Goddijn of the Dutch car satnav specialist TomTom invited to participate? RFID?
And as well as the Greek cement guy, Bertrand Collomb, Honorary Chairman of plasterboard manufacturer Lafarge, was also in attendance. So what’s the fascination with cement and plasterboard?
It’s certain, of course, that we will never really know.
Here, anyway, is the full list of attendees as published by Prison Planet:-
It would be interesting to hear the opinions of our commentariat of the Global Elite Wiki that is being constructed here. By definition, the complex and arcane web spun by the power elite is something the little people, the nobodies can know very little about. But this appears at first glance to be a solid, sober and extremely comprehensive attempt to rectify that. Have a nose around. See what you think.
So the outsider, the Iraq man Wolfowitz just didn’t have the class or inspire the confidence to lead the World Bank on the nine-year trek towards the sunlit, global poverty-free uplands of 2015. A really rather minor problem with his somewhat unlikely girlfriend, Shaha Riza - just a matter of arranging jobs, steepling pay rises, and “outstanding” ratings in performance reviews, nothing really - has proved fatal. All a bit of a shock for someone doing probably only what he thought everyone always did. This time next month the Wolf will be stoically packing away his unused WB-imprinted toilet rolls in his WB-embossed briefcase, and walking out into the DC night a banking giant no more.
Despite pleas from several member-nations for the choice of successor to be thrown open to non-Americans, President Bush announced his man for the job today. It’s career diplomat turned Goldman Sachs banker, Robert Zoellick. An administration official said that his dual experience “makes him uniquely prepared to take on this challenge.”
After the Wolfowitz resignation, the man charged with “finding” a successor was US treasury secretary Henry Paulson. Now Paulson is, some may be surprised to hear, a Christian Scientist. But the important point is that he is actually Goldman Sachs to the core, having joined the bank in 1974 and succeeded to the post of CEO in the early 2000s. He has a net worth estimated at $700 million. Like each of his three previous Goldman Sachs CEOs, Joe Corzine, Stephen Friedman and Robert Rubin, he found the pull of a government appointment too strong and took up the post of Treasury Secretary in June of last year (it was thought at the time that one Robert Zoellick might beat him to it). Strangely, a former colleague at Goldman Sachs, Bob Steel, has just been nominated as Undersecretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance.
This cosy relationship between money and power has been going on since the days of FDR, when Goldman Sachs then head Sydney Weinberg made the switch. He argued for other senior executives to follow him in a second career as a public servant, and the trend was quickly established. It is recognised in the recruiting strategy at the bank, which consciously seeks managers with government experience.
Robert Zoellick - no Christian Scientist, by the way - is such an individual. It must have been a tough job for Paulson to root out a man with such rare gifts at ... Goldman Sachs. Among these is a past association with Team Bush, namely that in the run up to the 2000 Presidential Election, Zoellick served on a foreign policy advisory group known as the Vulcans, led by Condoleezza Rice. Other group members included Richard Armitage, Richard Perle and ... Paul Wolfowitz. Small world.
But then Zoellick goes back with Wolfowitz, Armitage and Perle well into the nineties. All three were signatories to a letter to President Clinton drafted on 26th January 1998 by the PNAC calling for “removing Saddam’s regime from power.” Small, small world. Just as it is designed to be.
It is the chief myth of our age that the legitimacy of government is derived by Lockean consent. Consent is the founding principle of democracy and everyone knows how sacred, beautious and alround super-desirable democracy is.
Well, we do, don’t we? That’s what we are told, anyway. But it doesn’t matter. It really doesn’t matter what we think because all the noise about consent is a screamingly obvious sham. The interests of the ruling elite simply do not lie in its own submission to popular consent. They lie in securing and ever-strengthening its hold on power, infuence and wealth. The elite will, therefore, seek by any and all means the submission of the people to that end. It will manufacture consent long before it will relinquish what it loves. And where consent cannot be manufactured it will resort to more coercive means, only the most benign of which is to spin popular opinion into its opposite (“We are more tolerant oblique open to change oblique eat more chicken tikka marsala than ever”) and blithely go about its business.
In this essay I will explore the roots of the modern managerial power elite, that loose association of political, cultural and corporate players who, though constantly changing, are nonetheless changeless and number globally perhaps no more than a few tens of thousands. It is an alliance of interests and natures and origins. In its generality it is not a conspiracy, although at the highest, most Bilderbergian levels all the characteristics of conspiracy - exclusivity, secrecy, conversation and decision - do indeed apply. Even there, though, I wonder whether most of the 130 or so little big men who get to be ushered past “Security” really are the stuff of global dictatorship. We do well to remember that the elite is not wholly of one mind and arose, indeed evolved over a lengthy period from a multiplicity of directions and through several agencies. In all important respects that evolution was more organic than conspiratorial and more accidental than organic.
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa