Category: MR Radio
“Political power flows from organisation. No organisation, no power”
While defending our ghetto square and the merits of strengthening our grass roots community by preaching there to its choir, deepening our understanding and resolve, it seems that at this point Majority Rights could also do well with forays to visit those down some side streets - to pursue interviews not only with those who are most aligned with our views, but also to follow a path of those who might be slightly off - i.e. slightly antagonistic to our views in a somewhat liberal direction, at least explicitly, while having some implicit sympathy through connection to our square, our cause; such that MR’s platform might bring-out that connection with their underlying fairness in concern for our people and our kinds. The more public, known or respectable the person, perhaps the better. They might come to us with an intent to criticize us or save face in cover inasmuch – fine. Perhaps we can stand corrected. That’s not so much the problem as coming-up with good candidates for this kind of discussion/debate, those who may be lurking in what are the shadowy side-streets for us. Therefore the reason for this post is to ask for suggestions as to fairly prominent/respectable liberals, etc. Those fairly askance of our views, but not so antagonistic as to be futile to hope to engage. Rather to pursue those who might be ripe to debate GW or another MR representative, to at least hear-us-out. We might see where the dimly lit path takes us…
Posted by DanielS on Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 06:10 AM in Activism, Awakenings, British Politics, Conservatism, Education, Feminism, Libertarianism, MR Radio, Political Philosophy, Popular Culture, Race realism, Social liberalism, Social Sciences, White Genocide Project, White Nationalism
We expect to talk again to Anthony in a few weeks, this time on a more technical level.
In citing Yockey’s definition of liberalism, I do believe Tanstaafl captures some of the “it’s a bit more than that” to the definition of liberalism that GW advised over and against the one that I was proffering in the interview with Metzger.
Fortunately for me (and for us as a race), it is not really contradictory of the definition which I would venture as most useful. Though it is, I admit, more articulate in some significant ways that GW would/does appreciate.
I would have liberalism be defined primarily as permission of the violation of the classification - which is the parameters of the group systemic organism of race.
Yockey, like GW, focuses even more meticulously on the individual (as well), to where liberalism would be the experimentation with going beyond the normal parameters of our biology as individuals as well.
That would have several “more than that” interesting implications which provide clues as to where GW was going.
One implication would indicate why GW focuses so much on the Ontology of who we authentically are as European group(s) and individuals. We cannot even know what liberalism is, entirely, or what is inauthentic response to liberaism, a reaction, until that is settled…
Posted by DanielS on Wednesday, June 11, 2014 at 03:06 AM in Anthropology, Conservatism, Liberalism & the Left, MR Radio, Psychology, Social liberalism, The Ontology Project
A discussion between Tom Metzger and myself, with Daniel and the indefatigable Jimmy Marr for good measure.
Soren’s review, given in an informal conversation with me, of Guillaume’s Faye’s manifesto for the radical right, Why We Fight. Please go to the radio page.
There’s a new radio show. Prepare to be shocked.
A Tea Party Round Table with Matt Parrott and Kievsky is now available at the radio page.
There’s a new show on the radio page.
Jonathan has responded positively to my request for an interview, notwithstanding the warning “racism and hate - please see your librarian” that greeted his attempt to load MR on the monitored monitor he happened to be using at the time. He tells me that, coincidentally, he has just recorded a VoR programme with Tom Sunic. I will find out when that is going to air, but I am not overly bothered about the clash because, of course, VoR does not have the superbly inquisitive commentariat that we have.
So, you asked for him. You have got him. Now what do you want to hear from him?
Talking to people for the radio project isn’t exactly difficult. A bit of research and some thought beforehand, and the rest is, well, normal really. But finding the right people to talk to - people who not only have some salience in our world and something interesting and important to say, but will also attract listeners - is not quite so easy. So I thought it would be useful to throw the floor open to suggestions. Who do you think we should ask to be interviewed?
The candidate must be someone likely to accept, and must speak clear English. Other than that, the field is open.
At the weekend Lee John Barnes and I finally recorded an hour’s worth of sometimes fairly frank discussion, and the result is on the Radio page. Lee, it must be said, has no official remit to speak for the party leadership. But he is as close and as loyal to it as anyone I am likely to interview for the foreseeable future, and puts up a spirited defence - alongside an interesting focus on non-political activism to address the fractured and atomised condition of the white working class under multiculturalism.
See the Radio Page.
My next MR Radio interview subject is Lee John Barnes of the BNP. His contributions to recent threads here have been interesting, to say the least, and this is your opportunity to help frame the questioning he will receive sometime in the next week.
My interview of Dr Dan Roodt, which took place on Tuesday evening, is now on the Radio page. It is in three parts of about 20 minutes each.
Dan Roodt is a leading campaigner for the white South African and, most especially, Afrikaner cause. He is also an author, journalist and blogger, and links to his on-line publications are here:
I am preparing an MR Radio interview - exact time still to be established - with the brave and steadfast South African journalist and activist, Dr Dan Roodt. Many of you will be aware of his name, some of his work. I will be asking him about South Africa and South Africans, black and white, and about his hopes and fears for the future. If there are specific questions you would like me to put to him, I shall certainly try to do so.
The Linder interview, which took place on Tuesday afternoon, is now on the Radio Page. It is long, having been closely edited as such so it would make a single podcast, and I hope quite stimulating.
I’m pleased to see that Alex has answered a couple of questions on the earlier thread, which I did not raise with him in our conversation.
Tomorrow morning Central Time I’ll be interviewing Alex Linder. The shape of the discussion is pretty well set, but I would be interested to know if readers have their own questions they would like to see asked.
If such questions differ from what I already have planned, and providing they are productive, of course, I’ll find some time to ask them.
Soren and I have decided to re-open the Radio Project - that’s ours, not Mr Rockefeller’s. Initially, at least, the interviewing is likely to be done by me. Soren gamely agreed to be my first victim. The result is a long and, I think, pretty interesting investigation of Soren’s political development.
There was a microphone issue at the Chicago end of the operation, and the stereo reflects that at the moment. If we can re-process the recording and eliminate that we will do so.
The button on the sidebar will take you to the Radio Page.
An opening out of the themes from Part 1, these being the inadequacy of our philosophy and its fatal disconnection from first principles, or first cause. On the Radio page now.
Soren interviewed Alex Linder a few days ago, and the result is now on the radio page. Alex can make strong meat taste like boiled chicken, and a certain degree of editing was needed to calm my prissy English sensibilities. And my fear of going to prison, of course.
The interview was aimed not at exploring the JQ but at exploring Alex. The man is an energised, flowing speaker, and genuinely sees the JQ as the problem, if not the only problem. That isn’t Soren’s view or anyone else’s at MR, and the views Alex expresses are, of course, wholly his own.
But if you listen hard, you will find that the humorous, harshly sarcastic ideologue of VNN is also courageous, honest and true.
File size is 36.1MB. Run time about 38 mins.
Soren has conducted a second interview with Dr Tomislav Sunic. File size 57.5 Mb, run-time 1hr 2min 45sec.
White Genocide Project
Also see trash folder.
Each author's name links to a list of all articles posted by the writer; the hashes link to authors' homepages.
Endorsement not implied.
Nationalist Political Parties
Whites in Africa